Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Tsung-mi"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[[Tsung-mi]]''' (780-841)
 
'''[[Tsung-mi]]''' (780-841)
 
[[File:Tsung-mi.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Tsung-mi.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
The fifth and last [[recognized]] [[patriarch]] of the [[Hua-yen school]] in [[China]], as well as a widely admired [[Ch'an]] [[master]]. He received a standard {{Wiki|Confucian}} (see {{Wiki|Confucianism}}) [[education]] as a youth and was about to take the civil service examinations when he encountered the [[Ch'an]] [[monk]] [[Tao-yüan]] in 807. He was so impressed by him that he abandoned his career in [[order]] to join him. After a year of [[Ch'an]] study he read a commentary on the [[Hua-yen ching]] by [[Ch'eng-kuan]] (738-820), and switched his focus to [[Hua-yen]] studies. He travelled to the {{Wiki|capital}} city of [[Lo-yang]], where he studied with [[Ch'eng-kuan]] until the latter's [[death]]. His [[fame]] spread, and he was invited to lecture in the {{Wiki|imperial}} palace and was subsequently given many honorific titles by the [[throne]]. His wide-ranging studies, coupled with his [[meditative]] [[experience]], led him to criticize [[Ch'an's]] rejection of [[scriptures]] and [[oral teachings]]. As an alternative, he proposed that [[doctrinal]] study and [[Ch'an]] [[meditation]] mutually supported and reinforced each other, a {{Wiki|theory}} called ‘[[doctrine]] and [[meditation]] leading to the same goal’ ([[chiao ch'an yi chih]]).
 
  
Aside from his [[Hua-yen]] lectures and writings, [[Tsung-mi]] wrote commentaries on other [[Mahāyāna]] [[scriptures]] as well as some original works. Perhaps most significantly, he proposed a {{Wiki|theoretical}} framework to settle the lingering [[controversy]] over sudden and [[gradual enlightenment]] within the [[Ch'an]] school. He set forth a [[typology]] of [[cultivation]] and [[enlightenment]] that [[recognized]] the possibility of either suddenness or gradualness in both. This led him to postulate an {{Wiki|ideal}} course of [[Ch'an]] practice as one marked by an initial [[experience]] of [[sudden enlightenment]] which was subsequently deepened by [[gradual]] [[cultivation]]; he criticized the [[Northern School]] for reversing these stages, which he [[thought]] left one's [[gradual]] [[cultivation]] without any foundation in an experiential [[realization]] of the [[nature]] of [[reality]]. However, he also criticized the heirs of the [[Southern School]] for having neglected the aspect of [[cultivation]] in favour of an all-sufficient [[experience]] of [[sudden enlightenment]].
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The fifth and last [[recognized]] [[patriarch]] of the [[Hua-yen school]] in [[China]], as well as a widely admired [[Ch'an]] [[master]]. He received a standard {{Wiki|Confucian}} (see {{Wiki|Confucianism}}) [[education]] as a youth and was about to take the civil service examinations when he encountered the [[Ch'an]] [[monk]] [[Tao-yüan]] in 807.
 +
 
 +
He was so impressed by him that he abandoned his career in [[order]] to join him. After a year of [[Ch'an]] study he read a commentary on the [[Hua-yen ching]] by [[Ch'eng-kuan]] (738-820), and switched his focus to [[Hua-yen]] studies. He travelled to the {{Wiki|capital}} city of [[Lo-yang]], where he studied with [[Ch'eng-kuan]] until the latter's [[death]].
 +
 
 +
His [[fame]] spread, and he was invited to lecture in the {{Wiki|imperial}} palace and was subsequently given many honorific titles by the [[throne]].
 +
 
 +
His wide-ranging studies, coupled with his [[meditative]] [[experience]], led him to criticize [[Ch'an's]] rejection of [[scriptures]] and [[oral teachings]]. As an alternative, he proposed that [[doctrinal]] study and [[Ch'an]] [[meditation]] mutually supported and reinforced each other, a {{Wiki|theory}} called ‘[[doctrine]] and [[meditation]] leading to the same goal’ ([[chiao ch'an yi chih]]).
 +
 
 +
Aside from his [[Hua-yen]] lectures and writings, [[Tsung-mi]] wrote commentaries on other [[Mahāyāna]] [[scriptures]] as well as some original works. Perhaps most significantly, he proposed a {{Wiki|theoretical}} framework to settle the lingering [[controversy]] over sudden and [[gradual enlightenment]] within the [[Ch'an]] school.  
 +
 
 +
He set forth a [[typology]] of [[cultivation]] and [[enlightenment]] that [[recognized]] the possibility of either suddenness or gradualness in both.  
 +
 
 +
This led him to postulate an {{Wiki|ideal}} course of [[Ch'an]] practice as one marked by an initial [[experience]] of [[sudden enlightenment]] which was subsequently deepened by [[gradual]] [[cultivation]]; he criticized the [[Northern School]] for reversing these stages, which he [[thought]] left one's [[gradual]] [[cultivation]] without any foundation in an experiential [[realization]] of the [[nature]] of [[reality]].  
 +
 
 +
However, he also criticized the heirs of the [[Southern School]] for having neglected the aspect of [[cultivation]] in favour of an all-sufficient [[experience]] of [[sudden enlightenment]].
 
{{R}}
 
{{R}}
 
[http://www.answers.com/topic/tsung-mi www.answers.com]
 
[http://www.answers.com/topic/tsung-mi www.answers.com]

Revision as of 10:31, 13 November 2015

Tsung-mi (780-841)

Tsung-mi.jpg



The fifth and last recognized patriarch of the Hua-yen school in China, as well as a widely admired Ch'an master. He received a standard Confucian (see Confucianism) education as a youth and was about to take the civil service examinations when he encountered the Ch'an monk Tao-yüan in 807.

He was so impressed by him that he abandoned his career in order to join him. After a year of Ch'an study he read a commentary on the Hua-yen ching by Ch'eng-kuan (738-820), and switched his focus to Hua-yen studies. He travelled to the capital city of Lo-yang, where he studied with Ch'eng-kuan until the latter's death.

His fame spread, and he was invited to lecture in the imperial palace and was subsequently given many honorific titles by the throne.

His wide-ranging studies, coupled with his meditative experience, led him to criticize Ch'an's rejection of scriptures and oral teachings. As an alternative, he proposed that doctrinal study and Ch'an meditation mutually supported and reinforced each other, a theory called ‘doctrine and meditation leading to the same goal’ (chiao ch'an yi chih).

Aside from his Hua-yen lectures and writings, Tsung-mi wrote commentaries on other Mahāyāna scriptures as well as some original works. Perhaps most significantly, he proposed a theoretical framework to settle the lingering controversy over sudden and gradual enlightenment within the Ch'an school.

He set forth a typology of cultivation and enlightenment that recognized the possibility of either suddenness or gradualness in both.

This led him to postulate an ideal course of Ch'an practice as one marked by an initial experience of sudden enlightenment which was subsequently deepened by gradual cultivation; he criticized the Northern School for reversing these stages, which he thought left one's gradual cultivation without any foundation in an experiential realization of the nature of reality.

However, he also criticized the heirs of the Southern School for having neglected the aspect of cultivation in favour of an all-sufficient experience of sudden enlightenment.

Source

www.answers.com