Compiled Information on the Life and Works of Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and Bibliographical Resources The information in this document started being compiled by Pascale Hugon in the framework of the Project P23422-G15 “Early bKaʾ gdams pa scholasticism – Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s contribution” generously supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (August 2012-September 2017). I am grateful to (in alphabetical order) Kazuo Kano, Hiroshi Nemoto, Fumihito Nishizawa, Eric Werner and Jongbok Yi for their additional input. First published online: 15.09.2015. Last update: 6.2.2020. Please send additional information, corrections and emendations to pascale.hugon@oeaw.ac.at. Table of contents 1. Biographical information ................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Chronology ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Phya pa’s teachers ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Phya pa’s students ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Monks ordained by Phya pa ...................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Other information ..................................................................................................................... 7 2. Writings of Phya pa ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Extant works .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.a Chronology of the works .................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Works attributed to Phya pa ................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 By himself ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 By ‘Gos lo tsā ba gzhon nu dpal (1392–1481) .................................................................... 14 2.2.3 By gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428–1507) .................................................. 15 gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dGa’ byed 12-13 ................................................................................... 15 gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dGa’ byed 32 ........................................................................................ 15 2.2.4 By A khu Rin po che Shes rab rgya mtsho (1803–1875) .................................................... 15 A khu - Tho yig 637–677 ......................................................................................................... 15 3. Modern studies dealing with Phya pa, his life, his works, his ideas ............................................. 16 3.1 In English ................................................................................................................................. 16 3.2 In French.................................................................................................................................. 18 1 3.3 In Japanese ............................................................................................................................... 18 Bibliographical references .................................................................................. 20 1. Collections of texts, catalogues, etc. ............................................................................................. 20 2. Individual authors (ancient and modern)..................................................................................... 20 1. Biographical information In modern studies the majority of the available information on Phya pa (Phywa pa, Cha pa) has been provided in van der Kuijp 1978 and van der Kuijp 1983. Summaries of the available information are also found for instance in Seyfort Ruegg 2000: 37–40, Tauscher 2009–2010: 2–3 and Hugon 2008a: 35– 36 (in French). A biography of Phya pa was reportedly composed by his student gTsang nag pa, but it is not extant. van der Kuijp 1978: 355: “The bibliography of A-khu Rin-po-che notes that one of his foremost disciples, gTsang-nag-pa brTson-'grus seng-ge was the author of his biography entitled, 'The biography of Phya pa Chos-kyi seng-ge, the diffusion of the light of confidence in a hundred regions' (Phya-pa Chos-kyi seng-ge 'i rnam-thar dad-pa'i ( 'od-(g)zer phyogs-brgyar 'gyed-pa).1 Cf. his 'tho-yig' reprinted in Materials of a History of Tibetan Literature, Part 3, ed. L. Chandra, New Delhi, 1963, p. 507)” The eulogy composed by Phya pa’s student bSod nams rtse mo (bSod nams rtse mo – bsTod pa) stresses his intellectual capacities but does not provide chronological information apart from the exact date of his death. 1.1 Chronology 1109 Birth at Cha (stag rtse rdzong) van der Kuijp 1978: 355 van der Kuijp 1983: 59 < gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dGa’ byed 32/5-33/1: lo tsa ba chen pos lo bcu bdun phrag gsum du bzhugs nas lung rigs kyi bstan pa nyin mo ltar mdzad de mya ngan las 'das pa'i lo sa mo glang la cha [read: phya] pa chos kyi seng ge sku 'khrungs te “The Great Translator, having lived for three times seventeen years, had acted like the day [illuminating] the teaching of the authoritative texts and reasoning; in the earth-female-ox year [1109, the year] of his nirvana, Phya-pa Chos-kyi seng-ge was born.” gSer mdog Paṇ chen – rNgog lo rol mo 4b4–5: de rjes phya pa chos kyi seng ges gdan sa lo bcwa brgyad mdzad / ʾdi lo chen gshes paʾi lo / sa mo glang la ʾkhrungs nas... gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b2–3: chos kyi seng ge ni lo chen bde bar gshegs paʾi lo sku ʾkhrungs shing / TBRC P1404 – Associated Places Sørensen&Hazod 2007: 153, n. 402 (on the location of Cha/Phya, south-east of dGaʾ ldan) ? Monastic vows with Zhang tshes spong Chos kyi bla ma See 1.2 “Zhang tshes spong” ? Final monastic ordination and vinaya studies with Bya ʾdul See 1.2 “Bya ’dul” 2 ca. 1129–? Studies and assistantship under rGya dmar pa in sTod lung See 1.2 “rGya dmar pa” and 1.5(i) 1129 or later Teaches Phag mo gru pa in sTod lung See 1.3 “Phag mo gru pa” and 1.5(ii) 1130 or later (before 1140) Teaches Dus gsum mkhyen pa at Se thang in sTod lung See 1.3 “Dus gsum mkhyen pa” and 1.5 (iii) 1148 or 1152 “Teacher” (ācārya) in the full ordination of Rin po che Glang lung pa See 1.4 (ii) ca. 1152–1169 Abbot of gSang phu for 18 years van der Kuijp 1978: 356 < ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 292; Roerich 1949–1953: I 329 “the abbot’s chair was occupied by... Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge for 18 years.”) An unlikely option is that he was abbot of gSang phu sNe’u thog for thirty-five years (i.e., 1134-1169), see Onoda 1989: 205f. “According to an account which is quoted in the SPDR (=Byams pa - gSang phu gdan rabs), after 18 year he moved to Gro lung pa’s place and studied under the master for 4 years. He then went back to gSang phu and occupied the abbatial seat for 17 years again.” gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b3: gdan sa lo bco brgyad mdzad pa’i bar la (6th abbot) 1158–1169 Teaches bSod nams rtse mo (and the other three jo sras) in gSang phu See 1.3 and the ref. in bSod nams rtse mo – bsTod pa cited below, as well as the Four jo sras in 1.3. 1169 Death Roerich 1949–1953: I 328: “Phya pa died in the year Earth Female Ox (sa mo glang 1169 A.D.).” van der Kuijp 1978: 355 gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 4b4–5: sa mo glang la ’khrungs nas / re gcig pa sa mo glang la gshegs / gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 6a5: sa mo glang gi lo la / slob dpon phya pa ’das... Death on the 23rd of the third month van der Kuijp 1987: 111, Onoda 1989: 206 < bSod nams rtse mo – bsTod pa 40/3/5: sa mo glang gi lo’i nag pa zla ba nag po’i phyogs kyi tshes brgyad 1.2 Phya pa’s teachers rGya dmar pa Byang chub grags of sTod lung Phya pa was his student and teaching-assistant for Madhyamaka and epistemology (before becoming a student of Gro lung pa) Roerich 1949–1953: I 332: “The ācārya phya pa also studied under him the systems of Mādhyamaka and Nyāya.” ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 404: slob dpon phywa pas dbu tshad gnyis ka'i rigs pa khong la bslabs pa yin van der Kuijp 1978: 355 gSer mdog Paṇ chen – rNgog lo rol mo 4b5: ʾdis dang po khyung gi slob ma / rgya dmar ba byang chub grags la dbu tshad gsan / phyis gro lung pa la pha rol du phyin paʾi mdo dang / rgyan sogs gsung rab yongs su rdzogs par gsan / gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 12b5–6: de [=Gro lung pa] dang rgya dmar ba gnyis ka la phya pa chos kyi seng ges gsan 3 Bya ’dul (=? Bya ’dul ba ’dzin pa brTson ʾgrus ʾbar, alias dge bshes Zul phu ba (c. 1100– 1170)/(1091-1166)/(1100-1174)? 1; two of his vinaya works are available in the KDSB, vol. 30 and 31) Gro lung pa Blo gros ‘byung gnas Vinaya studies following final monastic ordination. gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 4b6: bsnyen par rdzogs pa bya ʾdul gyi drung du mdzad nas ʾdul ba gsan / Vinaya and Abhidharma studies following final monastic ordination. gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dBu maʾi byung tshul 14b7: ʾdiʾi drung du phya pas bsnyen par rdzogs / ʾdul sngon sogs gsan pa rgya che / (Bya ʾdul is also reported to have ordained and taught vinaya to Phag mo gru pa when the latter was 25, i.e. in 1135, presumably in sTod lung, since rGya dmar is named as the ācārya) (cf. Roerich 1949–1953: 555) (Bya ʾdul is also reported to have ordained Khyung tshang pa (1115–), who received the full ordination from rGya dmar pa) (cf. Roerich 1949–1953: 441) Phya pa studied with him the Prajñāpāramitāsūtra(s) with the Ālaṃkāra (=Haribhadra’s Sphuṭārtha?) gSer mdog Paṇ chen – rNgog lo rol mo 4b5 phyis gro lung pa la pha rol du phyin paʾi mdo dang / rgyan sogs gsung rab yongs su rdzogs par gsan gSer mdog Paṇ chen – rNgog lo rol mo 5a6– 7: smad kyi slob maʾi chog ni phya paʾo // gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 12b5–6: de [=Gro lung pa] dang rgya dmar ba gnyis ka la phya pa chos kyi seng ges gsan Roerich 1949–1953: I 332: “When this Mahātman had reached the end of his life, the ācārya Phya pa studied with great diligence under him and composed an extensive commentary on the Sphuṭārtha.” Zhang Tshes spong ba Chos kyi bla ma (“at gSang phu sNe’u thog” ?) van der Kuijp 1978: 356 < ? “Phya pa received the teaching of the Ratnagotravibhāga from Chos kyi bla ma.” Kano 2010: 255, n. 21 < colophon of Phya pa’s rGyud bla don gsal: śa kyaʼi dge slong chos kyi bla maʼi zhabs kyi rdul phyi bos nod pa dge slong chos kyi seṅ ges nye bar sbyar ba rdzogs s.hyō / / (“at gSang phu sNe’u thog” ?) van der Kuijp 1978: 356 < (?) Phya pa took his monastic vows with him gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b1–2: sku’i gdan sa zhang tshe pong chos kyi bla ma la byung / de las nyang bran pa chos kyi ye shes dang / phya pa chos kyi seng ge rab tu byung /. Cf. Sørensen&Hazod 2007: 164 n. 416. 1.3 Phya pa’s students van der Kuijp 1978: 356 < ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 297/4; Roerich 1949–1953: I 333; Kong sprul - Shes bya ba kun khyab I 454, dPa’ - dGa’ ston 340–341; gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dBu ma’i byung tshul 15b3 (pp. 238–239) gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 4b7–5a4 Śākya mchog ldan reports in rNgo lo rol mo (3b6) that Bya ʾdul ʾdzin was born the year rNgog Lo came back to Tibet, i.e., ca. 1092. In 6b5–6 (and in dBu maʾi byung tshul 14b5), he says that he was ordained by ‘Bre shes rab ‘bar and received from him the name in religion brTson ‘grus ‘bar. 1 4 The “Eight Mighty Lions” (seng chen brgyad) (1) gTsang nag pa brTson ‘grus seng ge (2) Dan bag sMra ba’i seng ge (/ Dan ʾbag sMra baʾi seng ge / Dan bag pa sMra baʾi seng ge / Dan ʾbag pa sMra baʾi seng ge) (3) Bru sha bSod nams seng ge (4) rMa bya rTsod paʾi seng ge / rMa bya Byang chub brtson ‘grus (5) rTsags dBang phyug seng ge (6) Myang bran Chos kyi seng ge (7) lDan ma dKon mchog seng ge (/ʾDam pa dKon mchog seng ge) (8) gNyal ma Yon tan seng ge; or rKyang dur ba gZhon nu seng ge; or ʾU yug pa bSod nams seng ge gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 5a2–3 gives an alternative name for the Eighth Mighty Lion: 1. (=5) brTsegs dbang phyug seng ge 2. (=1) gTsang nag pa brtson ʾgrus seng ge 3. (=4) rMa bya rTsod paʾi seng ge 4. (=3) Bru sha bsod nams seng ge 5. (=6) Myang bran pa Chos kyi seng ge 6. (=2) Dan ʾbag pa sMra baʾi seng ge 7. (=7) ʾDam pa dKon mchog seng ge 8≠(8). rKyang dur ba gzhon nu seng ge la la dag ʾu yug pa bsod nams seng ge zhes zer yang dus mi ʾgrig / gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dBu maʾi byung tshul spaks of 8 lions and gives some details about the following ones (15b5– ): - brtsegs (=5) - bru sha bsod nams seng ge (=3) - gtsang nag pa brtson ‘grus seng ge (=1) The Four Jo sras (jo sras mi bzhi) (1) rNgog Jo sras Ra mo (=rgyal tsha ra mo, see below) (2) ‘Khon Jo sras rTse mo (=bsod nams rtse mo, see below) (3) Khu Jo sras Ne tso (4) gNyos/sMyos Jo sras dPal le gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 4b7–5a1: gnyis pa ni (= jo sras mi bzhi) i. (=2) sa jo sras bsod nams rtse mo / ii.(=4) mnyos jo sras dpal le / iii. (=3) khu jo sras ne tso / iv. (=1) rngog jo 5a1 sras ra mo rnams so // gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b3 : jo sras bzhi, but 16a1: jo sras gsum, among which - sa jo sras rtse mo (=i, =2) Ducher 2017: 290 “In [gSang phu] gNe’u thog, he was in a group of four sons of noble families [who studied] with Phya pa. There was bSod nams rtse mo of the ’Khon, rGyal tsha [Ra mo] of the rNgog, Ne rtso of the Khu, and dPal le of the sMyos.” < bSod nams dpal, Bla ma rngog pa yab sras rim par byon pa’i rnam thar in po che’i rgyan gyi phreng ba 21.3–4: ne’u thog tu phya pa’i spyan sngar jo sras bzhi ‘tshogs pa la: ‘khon bsod mans rtse mo, rngog rgyal tsha, khu ne rtso, smyos dpal le dang bzhi’i nang nas…. The Four/Three Wise Ones (shes rab can mi gsum/bzhi) (1) ‘Gar dbang grub (2) Khong po ‘jag chung (3) lHo pa sGog zan (4) Bar pu ba gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 5a1 lists only three “Wise ones”: gsum pa ni / (=shes rab can mi gsum) i. (=2) rkong po ‘jag chung / ii. (=3) lho pa sgom gzan / iii. (= 4) par bu ba blo gros seng ge rnams so //(15b7: spar phu ba blo gros seng ge) sgom gzan ni (=ii) lho pa thams cad mkhyen par grags pa ste / lho pa dha ra seng ngo // gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b3 also mentions only three “Wise ones” (shes rab can gsum), but speaks only about the first (=3): lho bran pa dar ma seng = lho pa thams cad mkhyen pa 5 The Three Who Attained Spiritual Goal-realization (grub thob mi gsum) (1) Dus gsum mkhyen pa dPal chos kyi grags pa (1110-1193), the first Karma-pa, who was in sTod lung at the age of 20 (i.e. 1130-). (2) Phag mo gru pa rDo rje rgyal po (1110–1170), who was in sTod lung at the age of 19 (i.e., 1129-) (3) gSal sto sho sgom (1116–1169) (?) zhang tshal pa / zhang ‘tshal pa gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo 4a7: dang po ni (=grub thob mi gsum) i. (=1) rjes dus gsum mkhyen pa / ii. (=2) phag mo grub pa / iii. (=3) gsal sto sho sgom rnams so // la la zhang ‘tshal pa yin zhes zer / gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 16a2: grub thob mi gsum du grags pa la / zhang tshal pa dngos slob yin min gyi bshad pa gnyis byung zhig / 16a2–3: - (=i, =1) dbu ser grags paʾi rje dus gsum mkhyen pa = chos kyi bla ma = rdo rje ʾod zer van der Kuijp 1983: 60 < Roerich 1949–1953: I 475: “At the age of 20, he [i.e., Dus gsum mkhyen pa (1110–1193)] visited sTod lungs sa thang. He heard from sTod lungs rGya dmar pa and his disciple the teacher and scholar Phya pa, who was learned in the Tibetan language only, the "Doctrine of Maitreya" (byams chos) and the dbu ma sher gsum.” ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 565: nyi shu pa la stod lungs se thang du phebs| stod lungs rgyad mar pa dang | de'i slob ma bod skad rigs gcig pa la mkhas pa slob dpon phywa ba gnyis la byams chos dang dbu ma sher gsum gsan zhing mkhas par bslabs| rNgog rGyal tsha Ra mo (1134–1170) Ducher 2017: 289 “He learned perfectly the teaching cycles on characteristics in gSang phu with master Phya pa.” < rNgog Byang chub dpal, rJe mar pa nas brgyud pa’i rngog bzhung pa yab sras kyi bla ma’i rnam thar nor bu’i phreng ba 31.5–8; See also the 4 jo sras bSod nams rtse mo (1142–1182), in gSang phu, where bSod nams brtse mo moved when he was sixteen (i.e., 1158) van der Kuijp 1978: 357 < Thu’u bkwan - Shel gyi me long 200/3, Tucci 1949: 100–101 Onoda 1989: 205 < gSer mdog Paṇ chen - rNgog lo rol mo p. 453; Byams pa - gSang phu gdan rabs 9a See also the 4 jo sras (?) ‘Jad pa slob dpon sTon skyabs (b. 12th c.) TBRC P3779 < ? 1.4 Monks ordained by Phya pa (i) Monk’s name Phya pa’s role Se sPyil bu pa Chos kyi rgyal mtshan (1121–1189) Preceptor (mkhan po, Skt. upādhyāya) for his ordination and full ordination Vetturini 2007: 133 and Vetturini 2007, Part 2: 260 < Lo dgon - ʾOd stong: rab byung dang bsnyen rdzogs gnyis kaʾi mkhan po phya pas mdzad Ye shes rgyal mtshan - Se spyil bu baʾi rnam thar 261,3–4: dge bshes cha paʾi drung du rab tu byung / lo lon nas mkhan po de nyid las bsnyen par rdzogs Member of the full ordination committee together with Bya ʾdul ʾdzin and bTsun pa Chos mchog gsum, when Rin po che was 29. (i.e., 1152), at sNon gyi gyad pa (read: gyang pa?) Vetturini 2007, Part 2: 294 < Lo dgon - ʾOd stong: nyer bdun pa la snon gyi gyad par / bya ʾdul ʾdzin / phya pa chos seng / btsun pa chos mchog gsum la bsnyen par rdzogs Teacher (slob dpon, Skt. ācārya) for the full ordination together with Bya ’dul (preceptor) and Roerich 1949–1953: 298: “At the age of 25, he received the final monastic ordination at Gyang pa of Mar snon, Bya- (TBRC P3448) (ii) Rin po che Glang lung pa brTson ʾgrus gzhon nu (1123–1193) (a student of gTsang pa rin po che Nam mkhaʾ rdo rje (1076–1160), born in sTod lung ʾtshur, ordained by Pa tshab at 19 (i.e., 1141/1142)) 6 (iii) Lho pa thams cad mkhyen pa=lho bran pa dar ma sen ge=lHo pa sgog/sgom zan sTon pa Chos mchog (secret preceptor) when Rin po che was 25. (i.e., 1148), at Mar snon gyi gyang ba ʾdul acting as upādhyāya, Phyā-ba acting as ācārya and the scholar Chos-mchog as Secret Preceptor (gsang-ston). ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 362: dgung lo nyi shu rtsa lnga pa la mar snon gyi gyang bar bya 'dul gyis mkhan po dang | phywa pas slob dpon dang | ston pa chos mchog gis gsang ste mdzad nas bsnyen par rdzogs| for lHo pa’s ordination when the latter was 17. gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu maʾi byung tshul 15b4: shes rab can gcig ni lho bran pa dar ma seng ste / phya paʾi drung du rang lo bcu bdun pa la rab tu byung / 1.5 Other information (i) Was rGya dmar pa’s best student van der Kuijp 1978: 355 < Padma – Chos ‘byung 190b: khyad par gangs pa she'u dang khyung gnyis ka'i dngos slob stod lungs rgya dmar pa byang chub grags / dbu tshad la de'i slob rna mang yang phvya pa chos kyi seng ge gtso bo / ; “In particular, the direct disciple of both Gangs-pa she'u and Khyung (Rin-chen-grags-pa) was rGya-dmar-pa Byang-chub-grags of sTod-lung. Although he had many students in Madhyamaka and logic (tshad-ma), Phya-pa Chos-kyi seng-ge was the best.” (ii) Held a grudge for eight years against Phag mo gru pa (1110–1170) as the latter was studying under rGya dmar pa (from 1129 onwards). van der Kuijp 1978: 355 < Roerich 1949–1953: II 255 (= ‘Gos lo tsā ba Deb ther sgnon po 483/6-7). “[Phag mo gru pa] said that while he was studying under rGya-dmar-pa, he offended the kalyāṇamitra Phya-pa and for eight years was unable to expiate it.” Roerich 1949–1953: II 255 “At the age of 19, he [=Phag mo gru pa] came to dbus. He unsaddled his horse (rta sga phog pa) at stod lung rgya dmar.” (iii) Did not know Sanskrit (at least at the time of his early studies in sTod lung) See 1.3 under Dus gsum mkhyen. (iv) Had a debate with the Indian paṇḍit Jayānanda at gSang phu, in the presence of Khu Lo tsā ba mDo sde ‘bar, and won the debate van der Kuijp 1983: 69 < noted in passing in gSer mdog Paṇ chen – Theg chen rgya mtsho 2, 518; detailed account in the gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu ma’i byung tshul 234: phya pa dbu ma rang rgyud la bshad nyan byed pa'i dus su / zla ba'i zhabs kyi brgyud 'dzin pandi ta jayānanda zhes pa zhing bod du byon / dbu ma la 'jug pa'i 'grel bshad mdzad / de'i dus su phya pas dngos su brtsad cing / rgyud nas kyang zla ba'i bstan bcos kyi tshig don gnvis ka la dgag pa'i rnam grangs shin tu mang po yod pa'i bstan bcos mdzad / dgag pa ji ltar song yang phyogs snga ma ni nges par long pa zhig go // van der Kuijp 1993: 193 (v) ‘Gro lung pa was Phya pa’s assistant (zur chos pa) when the latter was abbot of gSang phu (vi) Phya pa taught on the eastern side of rNgog Lo tsa ba’s mausoleum van der Kuijp 1987: 111 < dPa’ – Chos ‘byung 742–743 “In discussing the more wondrous aspects of ‘Gro-lung-pa’s life, Dpa’ p. 742-743 mentions that when he was at gSang-phu ne’u-thog, probably in the capacity of assistant (zur-chos-pa) to his junior Phy[w]a-pa who at the time was abbot, there was a configuration of four teachers whose teaching quarters were in the immediate vicinity of Rngog Lo-tsa-ba's mausoleum. On the eastern side of the mausoleum, Phy [w] a-pa taught logic and epistemology; on the southern side Rgya Mching-ruba the Maitreya[nātha] texts; on the western side Rin-chen tshulkhrims the abhidharma; and on the northern side of the mausoleum, Yon-tan shes-rab lectured on the vinaya.” Post-colophon addition to rNgog Lo’s biography by Gro lung pa in the manuscript published in KDSB 1, vol. 3, 285–333: shar du phya× pas 7 rnam nges ’chad // „In the East, Phya pa exposes the (Pramāṇa)viniścaya.“ and in the Bhutanese manuscript (see Dram Dul 2004: 76,3–4): shar ru phya pas rnam nges [bshad ?] // (vii) Sectarian affiliation? (viii) Wrote many refutations of Candrakīrti (ix) His Prajñāpāramitā and Epistemological lineage comes mainly from Gro lung pa van der Kuijp 1978: 357 “Phya-pa was essentially non-sectarian although he is frequently met with in the bKa'-gdams-pa biographies. This is probably due to the fact that he is considered a perpetuator of the rNgog-lo-tsa-ba tradition and that he was the abbot of gSang-phu monastery.” ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po 406: slob dpon phywa bas slob dpon zla ba grags pa la dgag pa mang du mdzad pa la| gSer mdog Paṇ chen – dBu ma’i byung tshul 15b7: phya pa’i phar tshad kyi bshad srol ni / gtso bor gro lung pa las byung ba ste / 8 2. Writings of Phya pa See Kano 2007: (47)–(48) n. 31 for a compilative list of the works of Phya pa (extant and attributed in A khu – Tho yig). 2.1 Extant works (a) The eighteen works in the table below, published in the bKa’ gdams gsung ‘bum (Vols. 6–9), are listed in Kano 2007: (21)–(23) and Tauscher 2009–2010: 5–6. Editions/transcriptions that are publicly available, as well as translations (only of significant portions of the text) are indicated in the last two columns of the table below. 1 Short title Colophon title Catalogue title bKa‘ gdams gsung ‘bum bDen gnyis rnam bshad dBu ma bden pa gnyis rnam par bshad pa yi ge nyung ngus gzhung gsal bar byed pa dBu ma bden gnyis kyi ‘grel ba Vol. 6, 185–250 33 folios Editions/Transcriptions/Synoptic tables • KWIC-online search-tool by Yoichi Fukuda showing the text in dbu can of paragraphs containing search words, which can be inputted in Tibetan script or in Wylie transcription. No. 18. Based on an e-text inputted by rNgag dbang ’od srung and proofread by Fumihito Nishizawa. http://tibetan-studies.net/ tiblogsearch/index.cgi • Passages 6b4–6 and 18b7–8 ed. in Werner 2014: Appendix 2 bDen gnyis don bsdus dBu ma bden pa gnyis kyi don bsdus pa 3 sNang ’grel dBu ma snang ba’i gzhung gi don rigs pa’i tshul dang myi ’gal zhing blo chung bas kyang bde blag du rtogs pa byis pa’i ’jug ngos su sbyar ba dBu ma snang ba’i ‘grel pa Translations Vol. 6, 251–257 4 folios • KWIC-online search-tool by Yoichi Fukuda showing the text in dbu can of paragraphs containing search words, which can be inputted in Tibetan script or in Wylie transcription. No. 19. Based on an e-text inputted by rNgag dbang ‘od srung and proofread by Fumihito Nishizawa. http://tibetan-studies.net/ tiblogsearch/index.cgi • Transcritpion and representation of the topical outline in table format by Hugon (with cross-references to (1) bDen gnyis rnam bshad) available online at http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/PhyaPaChos KyiSengGe • Synoptic table of the chapter lung gi don gzhan du rtog pa la rigs pas bsgrub pa (with cross-references to (1)) in Tauscher 2009– 2010: 16 Vol. 6, 266–428 82 folios • KWIC-online search-tool by Yoichi Fukuda showing the text in dbu can of paragraphs containing search words, which can be inputted in Tibetan script or in Wylie transcription. No. 21. Based on an e-text inputted by rNgag dbang ‘od srung. http://tibetan-studies.net/ tiblogsearch/index.cgi English transl. in Werner 2014 (footnotes) • Text in the process of being critically edited by Pascale Hugon and Jongbok Yi 4 rGyan ʾgrel dBu ma brgyan gyi 'grel pa rgya cher bshad pa dBu ma rgyan gyi ‘grel ba Vol. 6, 433–518 43 folios • Passages 26a4–5 and 26b4–5 ed. in Werner 2014: Appendix English transl. in Werner 2014 (footnotes) • Sa bcad of the excursus on the proof of emptiness in Hugon 2015b: 75–76 9 5 sNying po dBu ma de kho na nyid kyi snying po dBu ma’i de kho na nyid bsdus pa Vol. 7, 15-129 • Tauscher 1999 (ed.) – NB: ed. based on 58 folios another manuscript than the one in the dBu ma shar gsum bKa‘ gdams gsung bum gyi stong thun on the title page = TBRC W23505|2078 (first folio missing) • English transl. of the abbreviated topical outline in Tauscher 2003: 239–243 • English transl. of sNying po 58,3–80,13 (based on the edition in Tauscher 1999) in Vose 2009: 141–169 Japanese transl. of sNying po 111,5–113,9 in Kosumi 2010: 22– 24 sPyod ‘jug bsdus don • 28,14–35,7 (on the four philosophical positions regarding conventionalities) ed. in Hugon forthcoming b English transl. in Hugon forthcoming b • Passages 1,17–2,2; 24,10–22; 25,3–6; 28,14– 18; 34,10–16; 61,4–8; 112,20–113,3 ed. in Werner 2014: Appendix English transl. in Werner 2014 (footnotes) 6 sPyod ‘jug bsdus don Byang chub sems dpa'i spyod pa la 'jug pa'i don bsdus pa Vol. 7, 131–143 7 folios 7 bSlab bsdus bSlab pa kun las btus pa'i don bsdus pa 8 rGyud bla bsdus don Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bsdus pa'i don Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bsdus don Vol. 7, 145–156 6 folios 9 rGyud bla don gsal Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bstan bcos kyi tshig dang don gyi rgya cher bsnyad pa phra ba'i don gsal ba Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bstan bcos rgya cher bsnyad pa phra ba'i don gsal ba Vol. 7, 163–345 92 folios 10 mDo sde bshad mDo sde rgyan gyi bshad pa Theg chen mdo sde rgyan gyi legs bshad yang rgyan nyi 'od gsal ba Vol. 7, 351–537 94 folios 11 mDo sde rnam bzhag Theg pa chen po mdo sde rgyan gyi lus rnam bzhag Theg chen mdo sde rgyan gyi lus rnam bzhag Vol. 7, 539–572 16 folios 12 rNam nges bsdus don Tshad ma rnam par nges pa'i bsdus don Tshad ma rnam par nges pa'i bsdus don Vol. 8, 3–28 13 folios • Synoptic table by Hugon (with crossreferences to (13) ‘Od zer and the Pramāṇaviniścaya) available online at http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/PhyaPaChos KyiSengGe • Manuscript description in Hugon 2009a 13 ‘Od zer Tshad ma rnam par nges pa'i 'grel bshad yi ge dang rigs pa'i gnad la 'jug pa'i shes rab kyi 'od zer Tshad ma rnam par nges pa’i ‘grel ba Vol. 8, 35–427 197 folios • KWIC-online search-tool by Yoichi Fukuda showing the text in dbu can of paragraphs containing search words, which can be inputted in Tibetan script or in Wylie transcription. No. 3. Based on a non-proofread e-text inputted by Pascale Hugon. http://tibetan-studies.net/ tiblogsearch/index.cgi • Edition of the excursus on proofs (143a1– b7) by Hugon, available at http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/PhyaPaChos KyiSengGe • Edition of the excursus on thal ʾgyur (145a2–149a5) by Hugon, available at Vol. 7, 143–144 (fragment - 13 lines of the beginning of the text on the last folio of No. 6) • The main subdivisions are transcribed in Kano 2008: 158–161 and compared with rNgog Lo’s bsdus don on the same text. 10 http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/PhyaPaChos KyiSengGe • Discussion of the four philosophical positions (23b4–24a9) in Hugon 2016c 14 Mun sel Tshad ma yid kyi mun pa sel ba Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel Vol. 8, 434–626 97 folios English transl. in Hugon 2016c • KWIC-online search-tool by Yoichi Fukuda showing the text in dbu can of paragraphs containing search words, which can be inputted in Tibetan script or in Wylie transcription. No. 2. Based on a non-proofread e-text inputted by Dr. Thub bstan dgaʾ ba. http://tibetan-studies.net/ tiblogsearch/index.cgi • Chap. 1 ed. in Nishizawa 2011b • Critical edition of most of chap. 1 (1b1– 34a4) (without some excursuses) and fragments from chap. 2 and 3 in Hugon&Stoltz 2019: 179–207 English translation of these passages in Hugon&Stoltz 2019: 115–166 • Discussion of the four philosophical positions (1b9–3b3) critically edited in Hugon 2016c English transl. in Hugon 2016c • Passages 1b9–2a1, 2b1–6, 3a5–6, 3a7–9, 7a7–8 ed. in Werner 2014: Appendix. English transl. in Werner 2014 (various footnotes) • Passages 3b2–9, 4a6–8, 6a6–8a5, 8a5–6 in Hugon 2008a: Annexe 1 (717–722). • Passage on the definition of apprehended object (8a7–b2) edited in Hugon 2016c English transl. in Hugon 2016c • Passage on the argumentative analogy between yid dpyod and rtog pa (10b6–9) edited in Stoltz 2009: 385 English transl. in Stoltz 2009: 383–384 • Last part of chap. 2 ed. in Nishizawa 2011b: vol. 3 Japanese transl. in Nishizawa 2011b: vol. 3 • Passages 43a7–b1, 45a4, 45a9–b4 in Hugon 2008a: Annexe 3. • Section on proof statements (81b3–83a1) edited in Hugon 2011a 15 Grub mtha‘ bDe bar gshegs pa dang phyi rol pa'i gzhung rnam par 'byed pa bDe bar gshegs pa dang phyi rol pa'i gzhung rnam par 'byed pa Vol. 9, 7–72 33 folios 16 So thar mdo 'grel So thar mdo’i ‘grel ba So thar mdo’i ‘grel ba Vol. 9, 87–243 79 folios 17 'Od ldan rab gsal ‘Od ldan zhes bya ba’i ṭikka tshig don rab tu gsal ba ʾOd ldan zhes bya ba’i ṭikka tshig don rab gsal Vol. 9, 251–526 138 folios 18 dGe tshul rnam bshad Thams cad yod par smra ba'i dge tshul dGe tshul rnams kyi bslab pa’i rim Vol. 9, 533–598 33 folios • Section on the eighteenfold typology of consequences (85b7–87a3) edited in Hugon (unpublished) English transl. in Hugon (unpublished) • Chap. 5 ed. in Hugon forthcoming English transl. in Hugon forthcoming • Yogācāra- and Mādhyamika-chapters crit. ed. in Werner 2014: 92-117 English annotated translation of the Yogācāra- and Mādhyamikachapters in Werner 2014: 42-88. • 29b3–30a6 ed. In Hugon 2016c English translation in Hugon 2016c • 30a6–31a2 ed. in Almogi 2010: 195–197 English transl. in Almogi 2010: 166–168 • Synoptic table (with Skt. equiv.) in Werner 2014: 23. Detailed outline of the Yogācāra chapter on p. 29, detailed outline of the Madhyamaka chapter on p. 36. Japanese transl. of the synoptic table (with Tib. and Skt. equiv.) in Nishizawa 2013a: 69-71 11 rnams kyi bslab pa rim pa ston pa'i rnam par bshad pa pa ston pa’i rnam bshad No. 1 in the bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum is a 33-folio text with the catalogue reference “Phyi tsha 120“ on the cover page and the letter „Ga“ in the left margin on the recto of the folios. No. 2 in the bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum consists in 4 folios that are part of the same manuscript as No. 1. The two, together, correspond to ‘Bras spungs catalogue No. 015724, the title of which is given as dbu ma bden pa gnyis kyi don bsdus, which corresponds to the title in the incipit of No. 2. (dbu ma bden pa gnyis kyi don bsdus / phya pa chos kyi seng ge / phyi tsa 120 / ʾbru tsha / 37 folios / size 66.5x9.8) Another entry, ‘Bras spungs No. 015710 – slob dpon ye shes snying pos mdzad pa’i dbu ma bden pa gnyis rnam par ʾbyed pa / Phya pa chos kyi seng ge / phyi tsa 120 / ʾbru tsha / 4 folios / 66.5x9.8cm) might be a duplicate entry of the last four folios of ‘Bras spungs No. 015724 or another manuscript of text No. 2 (or an incomplete manuscript of No. 1). No. 3 in the bKa’ gdams gsung ‘bum is a 82-folio text with the catalogue reference “Phyi tsa 107” on the cover page. This corresponds to ’Bras spungs catalogue No. 015677 (dbu ma’i yig cha phya pas byas pa’o / phya pa chos seng / phyi tsa 107 / ʾbru tsha / 82 folios / 66x11cm). ʾBras spungs catalogue lists another manuscript of No. 3 under catalogue No. 015726 (dbu ma snang baʾi gzhung gi don rigs paʾi tshul ang mi ʾgal zhing blo chung bas kyang bde blag tu rtogs pa byis paʾi ʾjugs ngogs su sbyar ba bzhugs so / phya pa chos kyi seng ge / phyi tsa 120 / ʾbru tsha / 87 folios / 66.5x9.8cm). ‘Bras spungs catalogue lists as No. 015668 dbu maʾi yig cha bzhugs so / rigs pa smra ba’i dge slong chos kyi seng ge / ‘bru tsha / Phyi tsa 107 / 82 folios / 66x10cm). Based on the number of folios, this could be yet another manuscript of No. 3. No. 4 in the bKa’ gdams gsung ‘bum is a 43-folio text with the with the catalogue reference “Phyi tsa 120” on the cover page and the letter “Kha” in the left margin on the recto of the folios. This corresponds to ‘Bras spungs catalogue No. 015725 (dbu ma rgyan gyi ʾgrel pa rgya cher bshad pa rigs par smra baʾi dge slong chos kyi seng ges sbyar ba bzhugs / phya pa chos kyi seng ge / ʾbru tsha / 43 folios / 66.5x9.8). No. 5 in the bKa’ gdams gsung ‘bum is a 58-folio text (the first folio is missing). This is a different manuscript from the one edited in Tauscher 1999 (ed.) (45 folios (+4 lines) of 9 lines). See Hugon 2012 for some remarks about the differences between these two versions of the text. An edited version of texts No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 14 exists in a modern-format dbu can edition: Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge. Phya pa chos kyi seng ge’i gsung gces btus dbu tshad kyi yig cha. Lhasa, 2012: Bod ljongs bod yig dpe rnying dpe skrun khang (Byang chub ljon bzang, no. 6). Text No. 3 in this edition is not based on the manuscript published in the bKa’ gdams gsung ʾbum, but on a manuscript bearing the reference “phyi tsa 120”, which must correspond to ʾBras spungs catalogue No. 015726. 12 Text No. 4 is also included in a modern-format type-set edition of works related to the Madhyamakālaṃkāra: dBu ma rgyan rtsa ʾgrel phyogs bsgrigs. Bla rung sgar, [no date]: gSer ljongs bla ma rung lnga rig nang bstan slob grwa chen mo, 203–338 (TBRC W1KG8937). This edition appears to be based on a manuscript of No. 4 different from the one in the bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum (Werner, personal communication). (b) The ʾBras spungs dkar chag (p. 1822) lists an additional text attributed to Phya pa: dPal lha mo nam mkha'i gos can gyi gtor chog, which has not yet been published (Kano 2007: (48) n. 31). (c) The bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum dkar chag (vol. 1, p. 62) reports that damaged remains of a commentary on Śāntideva’s Śikṣāsamuccaya (bSlab btus kyi ʾgrel chen) by Phya pa were discovered in ʾBras spungs and that this text, along with No. 6 and No. 8, is also recorded in the dKar chag of sNye mo bye mkhar chos sde monastery (Werner 2014: 20). 2.1.a Chronology of the works Phya pa refers to sNying po (No. 5) in sNang ’grel (No. 3). (sNang ’grel 47a6: ʼdi rnams kyi don gyi cha ni kho bos de kho na nyid kyi snying por rgya cher gtan la dbab pas ʼdir ma spros te || legs par rtogs par ʼdod pas de las blta bar byaʼo || Passage identified by Jongbok Yi, cited in Hugon 2015b: 81, n. 9) In rGyan ‘grel he refers to two other works in which he deals extensively with the proof of emptiness. One of them might be sNying po (See 2.2.1). There are virtually identical passages in the Mun sel (No. 14) and the ‘Od zer (No. 13) – for example Mun sel 68a9–72a5 = ‘Od zer 111b5–115b1 – but I am unable at this point to ascertain the order of their composition. There are closely parallel passages in the Mun sel/’Od zer and the sNying po (No. 5), some of which with a significant adaptation of the terminology to the epistemological, respectively the Madhyamaka context of the discussion. Similarly, I am unable to ascertain an order of composition at this point. 2.2 Works attributed to Phya pa 2.2.1 By himself In his rGyan ’grel Phya pa refers to two of his works with the expressions Shes rab gsum la ’jug pa (“Introduction to the three kinds of wisdom”) and ’Jug ngogs bsdu bar bstan (em. gtan?) la phab pa (“Summarized introduction”?) (rGyan ‘grel 9a7: tshul lugs ʼdi dag rgya cher kho bos shes rab gsum la ʼjug pa dang ʼjug ngogs bsdu bar bstan (em. gtan?) la phab pa der blta bar bya ste | ʼdir rkang pa rkyang ste gnas paʼi yi ge cha tsam mthong pas ngo bo nyid myed par khas che ba rnams kyi spyir cha tsam brjod pa yin no ||. Cited in Hugon 2015b: 82, n. 22) One of the works referred to in this passage might be the sNying po, where a corresponding excursus is found. 13 The expression “’jug ngogs” recalls the description of sNang ’grel in its colophon (dbu ma snang ba’i gzhung gi don rigs pa’i tshul dang myi ’gal zhing blo chung bas kyang bde blag du rtogs pa byis pa’i ’jug ngogs su sbyar ba rigs par smra ba’i dge slong chos kyi seng ges sbyar ba//) 2, but the sNang ’grel does not include a corresponding excursus. 2.2.2 By ‘Gos lo tsā ba gzhon nu dpal (1392–1481) 1478: ‘Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po • Commentary(/ies) on the “Five Treatises” of Maitreya • Commentary on the Pramāṇaviniścaya • Commentary on the Satyadvayavibhaṅga • Commentary on the Mādhyamakālaṃkārakārikā • Commentary on the Madhyamakāloka • Commentary on the Bodhisattvacaryāvatāra • Commentaries on other texts • Abridgments of the preceding texts • Tshad ma’i bsdus pa yid kyi mun sel in verse only and with an auto-commentary • Large and short abridgments of the Madhyamaka system • "Summary on the theories of non buddhists and Buddhists" Phya nang gi grub mtha’ bsdus pa (reportedly) • "Exposition of the five bases of the knowable" shes bya gzhi lnga’i bshad pa (reportedly) ([405 in the Chengdu ed.] slob dpon phywa bas ni ne'u thog gi gdan sa ma mdzad gong nas chos grwa mang du bskyangs shing | bstan bcos brtsams pa yang byams pa'i chos lnga dang | tshad ma rnam par nges pa dang | dbu ma bden gnyis| rgyan| snang ga spyod 'jug la sogs pa'i TI ka mang po yang mdzad| so so'i bsdus pa yang mang du brtsams| tshad ma'i bsdus pa yid kyi mun sel zhes bya ba tshigs su bcad pa rang 'grel dang bcas pa dang | yid kyi mun sel rkyang pa ste gnyis mdzad| dbu ma la yang bsdus pa che chung gnyis snang | gzhan yang rtsom pa mang po mdzad pa 'dra ste kho bos mthong ba ni de dag dang | phyi nang gi grub mtha' bsdus pa dang shes bya gzhi lnga'i bshad pa tsam zhig go khong la... Roerich 1949–1953: 332–333: “The Teacher phya pa before occupying the chair of ne'u thog (gsang phu) maintained many religious schools, composed śāstras, numerous commentaries on the "Five Treatises" of Maitreya, the Pramāṇaviniścaya, the dbu ma bden gnyis, the Madhyamakālaṃkārakārikā, the Madhyamakāloka, the Bodhisattvacaryāvatāra and other texts. He also composed their respective abridgements. He composed the tshad ma'i bsdus pa yid kyi mun sel in verses and an auto commentary thereon; also a yid kyi mun sel without a commentary. Also a large and short abridgment of the Madhyamaka system. Further, he seems to have composed many other compositions. These had been seen by me and I also have heard about a phyi nang gi grub mtha' bsdus pa, or "Summary on the theories of non buddhists and Buddhists", and about a shes bya gzhi lnga'i bshad pa, "Exposition of the five bases of the knowable" by him.”) • An extensive commentary on the Sphuṭārtha (when studying with Gro lung pa) (Cf. 1.2, Gro lung pa) 2 A similar expression is used in the final verses of the rGyan ’grel (43a7) : dbu ma brgyan gyi rtogs sla byis pa’i ’jug ngogs su // rnam par phye te skyon myed bdag gis sbyar pa yin // 14 2.2.3 By gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428–1507) 1501*: gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dGaʾ byed (*Jackson 1987: 167) GSER MDOG PAṆ CHEN - DGA’ BYED 12-13 • Commentary to Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika (doubtful) • Commentary to Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya • Epistemological summaries: extensive, intermediate, short (slob dpon phya pas rnam 'grel nges gnyis ka'i ṭi ka dang | tshad bsdus rgyas 'bring bsdus pa sogs rtog ge'i rnam bshad mang du mdzad pa > van der Kuijp 1978: 357) GSER MDOG PAṆ CHEN - DGA’ BYED 32 • Epistemological summaries: extensive, intermediate, short; the intermediate one is the Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel (tshad ma rnam par nges pa rtsa 'grel la bshad pa'i gzhi dang gtso bo mdzad mod kyang rang nyid kyi rnam dpyod kyi rtsal gyis bton nas bsdus pa rgyas 'bring bsdus gsum mdzad par grags pa de'i nang nas 'bring po tshad ma yid kyi mun sel gyi bshad pas ni dus der gangs can gyi rtog ge pa mtha' dag la khyab cing gces spras su byed pa ... > van der Kuijp 1978: 357. Transl. in van der Kuijp 1983: 59: “...he indeed took the Pramāṇaviniścaya and its commentary as the basis and main [texts] for [his] explanations, it is well known that by deploying the capacity (rtsal-gyis bton-nas) of his own intellect, he composed the three Summaries [of] large, medium, and synoptic [length]. From among these [three], the explanations of the [one of] medium [length], the Tshad-ma yid kyi mun-sel, pervaded at this time [the hearts of] all the Tibetan logicians and was cherished (gces spras-su byed-pa) [by them].”) 2.2.4 By A khu Rin po che Shes rab rgya mtsho (1803–1875) A KHU - THO YIG 637–677 Lam rim section • Commentary on the Bodhicaryāvatāra (No. 11076) dBu ma section • Commentary on the Satyadvayavibhaṅga (No. 11317) • Commentary on the Madhyamakāloka (No. 11318) • Commentary on the Madhyamakālaṅkāra (No. 11319) • Commentary on the Uttaratantra (No. 11320) • Long and short summaries of Madhyamaka (No. 11321) Phar phyin section • Commentary on the Prajñāpāramitā (No. 11473) (according to Tauscher (1999 ed.: viii), this may be the commentary on the Sphuṭārtha mentioned in ‘Gos lo tsā ba – Deb ther sngon po) rNam ‘grel section • Commentary on the Pramāṇaviniścaya (No. 11803) • Tshad ma’i bsdus pa yid kyi mun sel with an auto-commentary (No. 11804) • Tshad bsdus Yid kyi mun sel (without auto-commentary) (No. 11805) • Shes bya gzhi lnga’i bshad pa (No. 11806) Grub mtha’ section • Phyi nang gi grub mtha’i rnam bzhag bsdus pa (No. 11910) The complete list is given in Tauscher 1999 (ed.): VIII. van der Kuijp 1983: 63 lists the entries from the rNam ‘grel section. 15 3. Modern studies dealing with Phya pa, his life, his works, his ideas Publications that predate the rediscovery of Phya pa’s text deal with his views on the basis of later accounts, notably by Śākya mchog ldan or Go rams pa, and of Tibetan views criticized by Sa skya Paṇḍita (the attribution of some of which to Phya pa is problematic). 3.1 In English Almogi 2010 On the distinction between Māyopamādvayavāda versus Sarvadharmāpratiṣṭānavāda in Phya pa’s doxography Huang 2014 Hugon 2004 Discusses in the introduction Phya pa’s role on the development of argumentation and debate and the origin of the chos-te-phyir pattern (see in particular pp. 20-35). On Phya pa’s understanding of the three characteristics of a correct logical reason in inference Hugon Hugon 2008b 2009a On Phya pa’s style of argumentation On Phya pa’s rNam nges bsdus don Hugon Hugon 2009b 2011a On Phya pa’s theory of definition On Phya pa’s theory of argumentation and his prescriptions regarding proof statements Hugon 2011b On Phya pa’s views on perception, including a discussion of his definition of valid cognition Hugon 2011c Includes a discussion of Phya pa’s interpretation of Dharmakīrti’s definition of valid cognition and the scope of valid cognition Hugon 2013 Overview of Phya pa’s theory of arguments by consequence (thal ‘gyur) and prescriptions regarding consequence statements Hugon 2015a Entry in the SEP dealing with early Tibetan views on epistemology and philosophy of language, among which those of Phya pa Hugon 2015b Hugon 2016a Hugon 2016b Hugon 20016c Hugon&Stoltz 2019 On the proof of emptiness, its epistemological background, the nature of the probandum On the eighteenfold classification of arguments by consequence (thal ’gyur) based on the nature of the logical reason Sequel to Hugon 2013, goes into the details of Phya pa’s basic classification of consequences Characterization of Phya pa’s philosophical position, discussion of his refutation of idealism and Sautrāntika representational external realism Detailed discussion of Phya pa’s philosophy of mind, including his views on the criteria for being a valid cognition, and his typology of invalid cognitions. Includes edition and English translation of the relevant portion of Chap. 1 of the Mun sel. 16 Hugon Kano 2020 (in press) 2008 Phya pa’s solution to the problem of unestablished subjects in arguments by consequence (thal ’gyur) Lists the main subdivisions of Phya pa’s Topical Outline of the Ratnagotravibhāga, compared with that of rNgog Lo Disscuses Phya pa’s interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga in comparison with rNgog Lo’s interpretation Kano 2010 Kano 2016 Discusses in chapter 10 rNgog Lo’s impact on doctrinal developments related to the Ratnagotravibhāga from the 11th to early 14th c., including Phya pa’s view, which are dealt with in more detail on pp. 296–309. Kellner 1997 Phya pa on conceptual incomptibility and logical reasons qua non-apprehension (based on Śākya mchog ldan’s account) Moriyama 2010 Nemoto 2013 Nishizawa 2013b Discusses Phya pa’s definition of the two truths and their relation Discusses Phya pa’s definition of a proper opponent and the various types of opponents English version of Nishizawa 2012b (in Japanese), see pp. 350– 352 on Phya pa’s place in the gSang phu tradition. Nishizawa 2016b English version of material presented in Nishizawa 2013c, 2015 and 2016a (in Japanese), see pp. 154-159 on Phya pa’s theory of perception Onoda 1986 Onoda 1989 Phya pa’s classification of arguments by consequence according to their nature, and based on the type of the logical reason (based on Śākya mchog ldan’s account and speculations from Sa skya Paṇḍita’s presentation of the opponent’s view) Chronology of abbots in gSang phu Onoda 1992 Stoltz 2007 Phya pa on the types of incompatibility and their definition (based on Śākya mchog ldan and other later accounts) On yid dpyod in the early bKa’ gdams tradition and Phya pa Stoltz 2009 On yid dpyod Stoltz 2014 On types of objects and of cognitions, and on the criteria for knowledge Tauscher 1999 A preliminary discussion of Phya pa’s views on prasaṅga, before his epistemological works became available, based on sNying po only Tauscher Tauscher 2003 2009–2010 Discusses Phya pa’s Madhyamaka position Sums up biographical information on Phya pa, repeats some points discussed in Tauscher 2003, and discusses the style of Phya pa’s bsdus don works van der Kuijp 1978 Pioneering article on Phya pa, providing information about his life and works, and discussing his views on the typology of mind (based on Go rams pa’s account) 17 van der Kuijp 1983 Chap. 2 on Phya pa, life and works, and on his views (based on later accounts by Śākya mchog ldan and Go rams pa) Chronology of the abbatial succession of gSang phu monatery van der Kuijp 1987 van der Kuijp 2003 Vose 2009 Vose 2015 Wangchuk 2017 Werner 2014 Phya pa’s presentation and criticism of Yogācāra and his (unpublished) discussion of Madhyamaka in his doxography (with a general presentation of the text and an edition and translation of the two relevant chapters). Preliminary remarks on Phya pa’s recovered epistemological works On Phya pa’s views regarding the ultimate and his criticism of Candrakīrti-oriented Madhyamaka. Reviewed in Hugon 2012. On Phya pa’s proof of emptiness and the combination of inference and rig shes. Discusses in the first chapter Phya pa (and rNgog Lo)’s interpretation of the Uttaratantra 3.2 In French Hugon 2008a Several chapters deal with Phya pa’s views on ontology, epistemology and logic. Akahane 2010 Presents Phya pa’s bDen gnyis rnam bshad Fukuda 1989 Kano 2002 On Phya pa’s views on the object of cognition (based on the presentation of the opponent’s view in Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Rigs gter) Phya pa’s interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga I. 26. Kosumi 2010 Translation and comments on a passage of the sNying po pertaining to the topic of moments (kṣaṇa) Moriyama Nemoto Nemoto 2001 2008 2011 Discusses Phya pa’s definition of the two truths and their relation Deals with Phya pa’s views on momentariness The third chapter deals with Phya pa’s interpretation of the Madhyamaka view of time (revised version of Nemoto 2008). Brief English summary on p. 360. Nishizawa 2010 Phya pa’s definition of tshad ma Nishizawa 2011a Phya pa’s criticism of rNgog Lo on the ascertainment of validity Nishizawa 2011b (unpublished) Doctoral dissertation on Tibetan Buddhist logic, with numerous references to Phya pa. Nishizawa 2012a On Phya pa’s philosophical standpoint Nishizawa 2012b Deals with Phya pa’s place in the gSang phu tradition Nishizawa 2012c Deals with Phya pa’s theory of rtogs pa on pp. 97–99 and 101–103 Nishizawa 2013a On Phya pa’s Grub mthaʾ Nishizawa 2014 Deals with Phya pa’s views on exclusion (apoha) on pp. 250–274. 3.3 In Japanese 18 Nishizawa 2016c Deals with Phya pa’s theory of perception Nishizawa Nishizawa 2018 2018 Madhyamaka thought of Phya pa Phya pa, rGya dmar ba, Gro lung pa, rNgog lo tsā ba on emptiness Nishizawa 2019 Gro lung pa and rGya dmar ba (and Phya pa?) on the two truths 19 Bibliographical references 1. Collections of texts, catalogues, etc. KDSB = bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum bKaʼ gdams gsung ’bum phyogs bsgrigs thengs dang po/gnyis pa/gsum pa/bzhi pa. Ed. dPal brtsegs bod yig dpe rnying zhib ʼjug khang. Vols. 1–30, Chengdu, 2006; vols. 31–60, Chengdu, 2007: vols. 61–90; Chengdu, 2009 ; vols. 91–120, Chengdu 2015: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang. bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum dkar chag bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum dkar chag. 4 vols. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2006–2016. ’Bras spungs dkar chag ’Bras spungs dgon du bzhugs su gsol ba’i dpe rnying dkar chag. dPal brtsegs bod yig dpe rnying zhib ’jug khang. 2 Vols. Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2004. TBRC Buddhist Digital Resource Center (formerly Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center). www.tbrc.org. 2. Individual authors (ancient and modern) Listed alphabetically, following the order of the Latin alphabet. For Tibetan authors, the root letter of the first syllable is taken as the initial letter. Akahane 2010 Ritsu Akahane, “Three Tibetan Commentaries on dBu ma bden gnyis” (in Japanese), Report of the Japanese Association for Tibetan Studies 56, 77–85. Almogi 2010 Orna Almogi, “Māyopamādvayavāda versus Sarvadharmāpratiṣṭānavāda: A Late Indian Subclassification of Madhyamaka and its Reception in Tibet,” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 14, 135–212. A khu - Tho yig A khu Ring po che Shes rab rgya mtsho (1803–1875), dPe rgyun dkon pa ‘ga’ zhig gi tho yig. Don gnyer yid kyi kunda bzhad pa’i zla ‘od ‘bum gyi snye ma. Lokesh Chandra, 1963, 637–830. Byams pa - gSang phu gdan rabs Byams pa kun dga’ ‘byung gnas, dPal ldan gsang phu’i gdan rabs bsal ba’i me long, Ōtani no. 13981. Dram Dul 2004 Dram Dul, ’Jig rten mig gcig blo ldan shes rab kyi rnam thar. Biography of Blo ldan shes rab. The Unique Eye of the World by Gro luṅ pa Blo gros 'byuṅ gnas. The Xylograph Compared with a Bhutanese Manuscript. Vienna: ATBS (WSTB 61). 20 Ducher 2017 Cécile Ducher, A Lineage in Time: The Vicissitudes of the rNgog pa bka’ brgyud from the 11th through 19th c.. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université de recherché Paris Sciences et Lettres, préparée à l’Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (unpublished). Fukuda 1989 Yoichi Fukuda, “チャパ・チューキセンゲとサキャ・パンディタの対象設定の理論,” [“On the Theory of the Object of Cognition of Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and Sa skya Paṇḍita”], Tōhōgaku 78 (『東方学』), [140]‒[127]. ’Gos lo tsā ba - Deb ther sngon po ’Gos lo tsā ba gZhon nu dpal (1392–1481), Deb ther(gter) sngon po. Ed. L. Chandra, New Delhi, 1974. Chengdu, 1984: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang. Huang 2014 Chun Yuan Huang, A Record of a Tibetan Medieval Debate: History, Language, and Efficacy of Tibetan Buddhist Debate. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University. (https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/12269848?show=full) Hugon 2004 Pascale Hugon, “Interpretations of the Trairūpya in Tibet,” Hōrin 11, 95‒117. Hugon 2008a Pascale Hugon, Trésors du raisonnement. Sa skya Paṇḍita et ses prédécesseurs tibétains sur les modes de fonctionnement de la pensée et le fondement de lʼinférence. Edition et traduction annotée du quatrième chapitre et d’une section du dixième chapitre du Tshad ma rigs pa’i gter. Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 69.1 and 69.2). Hugon 2008b Pascale Hugon, “Arguments by Parallels in the Epistemological Works of Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge,” Argumentation 22.1, 93–114. (DOI 10.1007/s10503-007-9074-7) Hugon 2009a Pascale Hugon, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Synoptic Table of the Pramāṇaviniścaya,” in Sanskrit Manuscripts in China. Proceedings of a panel at the 2008 Beijing Seminar on Tibetan Studies, October 13 to 17, E. Steinkellner, D. Qing, H. Krasser (eds.), Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House, 47‒88. Hugon 2009b Pascale Hugon, “The Origin of the Theory of Definition and its Place in Phya pa Chos kyi seng geʼs Epistemological System,” in Tibetan Scholasticism in the 11th and 12th Centuries – Contributions to a panel at 21 the XVth Congress of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Atlanta, 23-28 June 2008. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 32 (2009) [2010], P. Hugon and K. Vose (ed.), 319‒368. Hugon 2011a Pascale Hugon, “Argumentation Theory in the Early Tibetan Epistemological Tradition,” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 34.1‒2, 97‒148. Hugon 2011b Pascale Hugon, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng geʼs Views on Perception,” in Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference. Vienna, August 23‒27, 2005. H. Krasser, H. Lasic, E. Franco, B. Kellner (ed.), Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wisschenschaften, 159‒176 Hugon 2011c Pascale Hugon, “Is Dharmakīrti Grabbing the Rabbit by the Horns? A Reassessment of the Scope of prameya in Dharmakīrtian Epistemology,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 39.4‒5 (special issue: Proceedings of the Philosophy Panel at the XIVth World Sanskrit Conference [Kyoto, Japan, September 1‒5, 2009]), 367‒389. (DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9137-9) Hugon 2012 Pascale Hugon, Review of: Kevin A. Vose, Resurrecting Candrakīrti: Disputes in the Tibetan Creation of Prāsaṅgika, Boston, 2009: Wisdom Publications. Indo-Iranian Journal 55, 175‒188. (DOI 10.1163/001972412X620277) Hugon 2013 Pascale Hugon, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ’gyur): The Nature, Function, and Form of Consequence Statements,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 41.6, 671–702 (DOI 10.1007/s10781-013-9205-4). Hugon 2015a Pascale Hugon, “Tibetan Epistemology and Philosophy of Language,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/epistemology-language-tibetan/>. [Revised entry. Original entry 2011] Hugon 2015b Pascale Hugon, “Proving Emptiness – The Epistemological Background for the ‘Neither One nor Many’ Argument and the Nature of its Probandum in Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Works,” Journal of Buddhist Philosophy 1, 58–94. Hugon 2016a Pascale Hugon, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and His Successors on the Classification of Arguments by Consequence (thal ʾgyur) Based on the Type of the Logical Reason,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 44.5, 883–938 (DOI: 10.1007/s10781-015-9285-4). 22 Hugon 2016b Pascale Hugon, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ’gyur) (2): The analysis of the correspondence between a consequence and its reverse form and the thirteenfold typology of consequences.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 39, 51–113. Hugon 2016c Pascale Hugon, “Can one be a Mādhyamika, a crypto-Vaibhāṣika, and a faithful interpreter of Dharmakīrti? On Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s doxographical divisions and his own philosophical standpoint,” Journal of Tibetology/Zangxue xuekan 15, 51–153. Hugon&Stoltz 2019 Pascale Hugon and Jonathan Stoltz: The Roar of a Tibetan Lion – Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s theory of mind in philosophical and historical perspective, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. v+410 pages. (OA: https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at/the-roar-of-a-tibetan-lion) Hugon 2020 (in press) Pascale Hugon, “Universals, Demons’ Pots, and Demons’ Permanent Pots: Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on unestablished subjects in arguments by consequence,” in Reverberations of Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy: Proceedings of the Fifth International Dharmakīrti Conference Heidelberg, August 26–30, 2014, B. Kellner, P. McAllister, H. Lasic, and S. McClintock (eds.), Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. Hugon (unpublished) Pascale Hugon, “Translations that make sense.” Hugon forthcoming Pascale Hugon, Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge, Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel, Fifth chapter. Edition and translation. Jackson 1987 David Jackson, The Entrance Gate for the Wise (Section III). Sa-skya Paṇḍita on Indian and Tibetan Traditions of Pramāṇa and Philosophical Debate, Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 17.1 and 17.2). Kano 2002 Kazuo Kano, “Phywa pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Interpretation on Ratnagotravibhāga I.26,” Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyū 51–2, 109–111. [In Japanese] Kano 2007 Kazuo Kano, “rNgog Blo ldan shes rab cho Shokan kanro no shizuku: Kōtei text to naiyō gaikan [rNgog Blo ldan shes rab’s Springs yig bdud rtsiʼi thig le: Critical edition and survey],” Kōyasan daigaku mikkyōbunka kenkyūjo kiyō 20, (1)–(58). Kano 2008 23 Kazuo Kano, “rNgog blo ldan shes rab’s Topical Outline of the Ratnagotravibhāga discovered at Khara Khoto,” in Contributions to Tibetan Literature, Orna Almogi (ed.). Halle: IITBS. Kano 2010 Kazuo Kano, “rṄog Blo ldan śes rab’s position on the Buddha-nature doctrine and its influence on the early gSaṅ phu tradition,” Tibetan Scholasticism in the 11th and 12th Centuries – Contributions to a panel at the XVth Congress of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Atlanta, 23-28 June 2008. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 32 (2009) [2010], P. Hugon and K. Vose (ed.), 249‒283. Kano 2016 Kazuo Kano, Buddha-Nature and Emptiness – rNgog Blo-ldan-shes-rab and The Transmission of the Ratnagotravibhāga from India to Tibet. Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 91). Kellner 1997 Birgit Kellner, “Types of incompatibility (ʾgal ba) and types of non-cognition (ma/mi dmigs) in early Tibetan tshad ma literature,” in Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Graz 1995. Helmut Krasser, Michael Torsten Much, Ernst Steinkellner, Helmut Tauscher (ed.). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 495–510. Kosumi 2010 Takechika Kosumi (古角武睦), “Indo-Chibetto ni okeru yugagyō-chūgan-ha no setsuna-ron ni tsuite no denshō” [インド・チベットにおける瑜伽行中観派の刹那論についての伝承.] {A Tradition of Yogācāra-Mādhyamika's Views on Kṣaṇa in India and Tibet.}, Bukkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kiyō (Bungaku Kenkyūka Hen) [佛教大学大学院紀要(文学研究科篇)]{The Bukkyo University Graduate School Review (compiled by the Graduate School of Literature)} 38 (March 2010), 13-30. Kong sprul - Shes bya ba kun khyab Kong sprul Blo gros mtha’ yas (1813–1899), Shes bya ba kun khyab. Ed. L. Chandra, New Delhi, 1970. Lo dgon - ‘Od stong Lo dgon pa bSod nams lha’i dbang po (1423–1496), bKa’ gdams rin po che’i chos ‘byung rnam thar nyin mor byed pa’i ‘od stong. Crit. ed. in Vetturini 2007: Part 2. Moriyama 2001 Seitetsu Moriyama, “Chibetto bukkyō: Phywa-pa Chos-kyi-seng-ge oyobi dGe-lugs-pa no nitaisetsu no kaishaku” [チベット仏教: チャパチューキセンゲ及びゲルク 派の二諦説の解釈] {*The Interpretation of the Two Truths Doctrine of Phywa-pa Chos-kyi-seng-ge and dGe-lugs-pa}, Kotengaku no saikōchiku: Daiikki kenkyūseika hōkoku [古典学の再構築: 第一期研究成果報告], 78–85. Moriyama 2010 Seitetsu Moriyama, “The Relationship Between the Two Truths, bDen pa gnyis, According to Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge, and the Influence of His Interpretation on the dGe lugs pa Tradition,” in Studies in 24 the Philosophy and History of Tibet [PIATS 2006: Proceedings of the Eleventh Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Königswinter 2006], Maret Kark and Horst Lasic (ed.). Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH, 131‒143. Nemoto 2008 Hiroshi Nemoto, “チベット中観思想における時間論の展開---「刹那」の概念を中心に” [“Skad cig ma: The Problem of Time in Tibetan Madhyamaka Exegesis”], Report of the Japanese Association for Tibetan Studies (『日本西蔵学会々報』) 54, 3–15. (http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110009841248) Nemoto 2011 Hiroshi Nemoto, ゲルク派における時間論の研究 [A Study of the dGe lugs pa’s View of Time], Kyoto: Heirakuji-shoten. Nemoto 2013 Hiroshi Nemoto, “Who is a Proper Opponent? The Tibetan Buddhist Concept of phyi rgol yang dag,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 41, 151–165. Nishizawa 2010 Fumihito Nishizawa, 「チャパ・チューキセンゲの認識手段論 — 認識手段の定義をめぐって — 」(In Japanese) [“The pramāṇa Theory of Phya pa chos kyi seng ge— With Reference to his Interpretation of the Definition of Pramāṇa”], Report of the Japanese Association for Tibetan Studies (『 日本西蔵学会々報』) 56, 61–75. Nishizawa 2011a Fumihito Nishizawa, 「チャパ・チューキセンゲのゴク翻訳官批判 — 認識手段性の確定をめぐ って —」(In Japanese) [“Phya pa chos kyi seng ge's Criticism of rNgog Blo ldan shes rab: On the ascertainment of prāmāṇya”], Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu 『印 仏研』) 59.2, 76–79 = (999)–(996). Nishizawa 2011b - unpublished doctoral thesis Fumihito Nishizawa, 「チベット仏教論理学の形成と展開 — 認識手段論の歴史的変遷を中心と して —」，全四巻， 東京大学, 2011.［＝博士学位論文］[The Formation and Development of Tibetan Buddhist Logic — With Reference to the Historical transition of Pramāṇa Theory —. 4 vols., University of Tokyo, 2011]. Nishizawa 2012a Fumihito Nishizawa, 「『論理学意闇払拭』におけるチャパの思想的立場」(In Japanese) [“The Philosophical Standpoint of Phya pa chos kyi seng ge”], Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu『印仏研』) 60.2, 1062–1059. Nishizawa 2012b 25 Fumihito Nishizawa, 「サンプ教学の歴史的展開に関する一考察」(In Japanese) [“A Brief Survey on the Historical Development of the gSang phu Scholasticism”], Report of the Japanese Association for Tibetan Studies『日本西蔵学会々報』58, 1–14. Nishizawa 2012c Fumihito Nishizawa,「チベット仏教論理学における＜理解（rtogs pa）＞の概念について」(In Japanese) [“On the Concept of "Understanding" (rtogs pa) in the Tibetan Buddhist Logic.”], Indian Logic『インド論理学研究』4, 97–122. Nishizawa 2013a Fumihito Nishizawa, 「チャパ・チューキセンゲの教義書」[“The Grub mtha' Literature of Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge”], Report of the Japanese Association for Tibetan Studies (『日本西蔵学会々報』) 59, 67–84. Nishizawa 2013b Fumihito Nishizawa, “gSang phu ne'u thog — Its Contribution to the Re-establishment and Development of Tibetan Buddhism in the Later Diffusion (phyi dar) period.” In: Current Issues and Progress in Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar of Young Tibetologists, Kobe 2012. Tsuguhito Takeuchi, Kazushi Iwao, Ai Nishida, Seiji Kumagai, Meishi Yamamoto (eds.), Journal of the Research Institute of Foreign Studies 51, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, 343–366. Nishizawa 2013c Fumihito Nishizawa, “A Reconsideration of pratyakṣa and niścaya: Dharmakīrti’s Inconsistent Accounts and the Interpretations of Śākyabuddhi and Arcaṭa” (in Japanese), Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku bukkyogaku kenkyū) 61.3, 115–120. Nishizawa 2014 Fumihito Nishizawa, 「チベットにおける他者排除（anyāpoha）論の形成と展開 —11-12 世紀サ ンプ系論理学の伝承を中心として —」(In Japanese) [“The Formation and Development of Anyāpoha Theory in Tibet: With Reference to the gSang phu Scholastic Tradition of Pramāṇa in the 11th to 12th Centuries”], Indian Logic『Indo ronrigaku kenkyū, インド論理学研究』VII, 227–282. Nishizawa 2015 Fumihito Nishizawa, 「ダルモーッタラの直接知覚論」(In Japanese) [“Dharmottara’s Theory of pratyakṣa –– Its Originality and Theoretical Background”], Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 63.2, 90–95. Nishizawa 2016a Fumihito Nishizawa, “チャパ・チューキセンゲの直接知覚論” (In Japanese) [“Phya pa chos kyi seng ge’s Theory of pratyakṣa –– Focused on the Relationship between pratyakṣa and niścaya.”], Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 64.2, 71–75 [972–968]. Nishizawa 2016b 26 Fumihito Nishizawa, “A Reconsideration of perception and Object-Ascertaining Cognition: Dharmakīrti’s Inconsistent Accounts and the Interpretations of His Followers in India and Tibet.” Indian Logic (Indo ronrigaku kenkyū, インド論理学研究) IX, 145–164. Nishizawa 2017 Fumihito Nishizawa, “チャパ・チューキセンゲの中観思想 : その独自性と思想的背景 ” (In Japanese) [“Madhyamaka Thought of Phya pa chos kyi seng ge : Its Originality and Theoretical Background”]. 日本西蔵學會々報 62: 25–39. Nishizawa 2018 Fumihito Nishizawa, “ チベット初期中観思想における空性理解 : ゴク翻訳師,トルンパ,ギャマ ルワ,チャパ „ (In Japanese) [“On the Interpretations of Emptiness (śūnyatā) in the Early Tibetan Madhyamaka Thought : rNgog lo tsa ba, Gro lung pa, rGya dmar ba and Phya pa”], 日本西蔵學會々 報 64: 35–51. Nishizawa 2019 Fumihito Nishizawa, “ チベット初期中観思想における二諦説 —トルンパとギャマルワの二諦 を巡る論争—“ (In Japanese) [“The Two-truths（Satyadvaya）Theory of the Early Tibetan Madhyamaka Thought ―Controversies between Gro lung pa and rGya dmar ba on the Two-truths Theory”] Annual Memoirs of the Otani University Shin Buddhist Comprehensive Research Institute 36: 1–204. Onoda 1986 Shunzō Onoda, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Classifications of Thal ʼgyur,” Berliner Indologische Studien 2, 65–85. Onoda 1989 Shunzō Onoda, “The Chronology of the Abbatial Successions of the gSang phu sNe’u thog Monastery,” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 33, 203–213. Onoda 1992 Shunzō Onoda, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Theory of ʾgal ba,” in Buddhist Philosophy and Literature: Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Narita 1989 (Vol. 1). Zuihō Yamaguchi and Shōren Ihara (ed.). Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji, 197–202. Padma – Chos ‘byung Padma dkar po (b. 1527), Chos ' byung bstan pa'i padma rgyas pa'i nyin byed, Collected Works, Vol. 2, Darjeeling, 1973. dPa’ – dGa’ ston dPa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba (ca. 1504–1566), mKhas pa’i dga’ ston, Vols. 1–4. Ed. L. Chandra, New Delhi, 1960–1961. 27 dPa’ – Chos ‘byung dPa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba (ca. 1504–1566), Chos ‘byung mkhas pa’i dga’ ston. Ed. Lho brag, vol. 1, New Delhi, 1980. Roerich 1949–1953 George Roerich, The Blue Annals, Vols I&II, Calcutta. gSer mdog Paṇ chen – rNgog lo rol mo gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428-1507), rNgog lo tstsha ba chen pos bstan pa ji ltar bskyangs pa’i tshul mdo tsam du bya ba ngo mtshar gtam gyi rol mo, Collected Works (The Complete Works (gSung ʼbum) of gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan. Ed. Kunzang Tobgey, Timphu, 1975 [Reprint Nagwang Topgyal, Delhi, 1988]), Vol. 16, 443–456. gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dGa‘ byed gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428-1507), Tshad ma'i mdo dang bstan bcos kyi shing rta'i srol rnams ji ltar byung ba'i tshul gtam bya ba nyin mor byed pa'i snang bas dpyod ldan mtha' dag dga' bar byed pa, Collected Works (The Complete Works (gSung ʼbum) of gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan. Ed. Kunzang Tobgey, Timphu, 1975 [Reprint Nagwang Topgyal, Delhi, 1988]), Vol. 19. gSer mdog Paṇ chen – Theg chen rgya mtsho gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428-1507), Theg pa chen po dbu ma rnam par nges pa'i bang mdzod lung rigs rgya mtsho, Collected Works (The Complete Works (gSung ʼbum) of gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan. Ed. Kunzang Tobgey, Timphu, 1975 [Reprint Nagwang Topgyal, Delhi, 1988]), Vols. 14-15. gSer mdog Paṇ chen - dBu ma’i byung tshul gSer mdog Paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan (1428-1507), dBu ma’i byung tshul rnam par bshad pa’i gtam yid bzhin lhun po, Collected Works (The Complete Works (gSung ʼbum) of gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan. Ed. Kunzang Tobgey, Timphu, 1975 [Reprint Nagwang Topgyal, Delhi, 1988]), Vol. 4, 209–248. Seyfort Ruegg 2000 David Seyfort Ruegg, Three Studies in the History of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka Philosophy, Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 50). bSod nams rtse mo – bsTod pa bSod nams rtse mo (1142–1182), Slob dpon phya pa’i bstod pa, Sa skya pa'i bka' 'bum, Vol. 2, Tokyo, 1968, 39/4/4–41/3/1. Sørensen&Hazod 2007 Per K. Sørensen and Guntram Hazod, in coopoeration with Tsering Gyalbo, Rulers on the Celestial Plain, Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Veröffentlichungen zur Sozialanthropologie 10). 28 Stoltz 2007 Jonathan Stoltz, “Gettier and Factivity in Indo-Tibetan Epistemology ,” The Philosophical Quarterly 57.228, 394-415. Stoltz 2009 Jonathan Stoltz, “Phywa Pa’s Argumentative Analogy Between Factive Assessment (Yid Dpyod) and Conceptual Thought (Rtog pa),” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 32, 369-386. Stoltz 2014 Jonathan Stoltz, “Cognition, Phenomenal Character, and Intentionality in Tibetan Buddhism.” In A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, first ed. Ed. by. Steven Emmanuel. John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 405– 418. Tauscher 1999 Helmut Tauscher, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s Opinion on prasaṅga ,” in Dharmakīrti’s Thought and Its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy. Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference, Hiroshima, November 4-6, 1997. Vienne : Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 387–393. Tauscher 1999 (ed.) Helmut Tauscher, Phya pa Chos kyi seṅ ge, dBu ma śar gsum gyi stoṅ thun, Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 43). Tauscher 2003 Helmut Tauscher, “Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge as a Svātantrika,” The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika Distinction. What difference does a difference make? Georges Dreyfus and Sara L. McClintock (ed.). Boston: Wisdom Publications (Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism), 207–255. Tauscher 2009–2010 Helmut Tauscher, “Remarks on Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and his Madhyamaka Treatises,” The Tibet Journal 34.3–4 and 35.1‒2, 1–35. Thu’u bkwan - Shel gyi me long Thu'u bkwan Blo bzang chos kyi nyi ma, Grub mtha' thams cad kyi khungs dang 'dod tshul ston pa legs bshad shel gyi me long, Collected Works, Vol. 2. Ed. Ngawang Gelek Demo, New Delhi, 1969. Tucci 1949 Giuseppe Tucci, Tibetan Painted Scrolls, Rome. van der Kuijp 1978 Leonard van der Kuijp, “Phya-pa Chos-kyi seng-ge’s Impact on Tibetan Epistemological Theory,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 5, 355–369. van der Kuijp 1983 29 Leonard van der Kuijp, Contributions to the Development of Tibetan Buddhist Epistemology, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. van der Kuijp 1987 Leonard van der Kuijp, “The Monastery of Gsang-phu ne’u-thog and Its Abbatial Succession from ca. 1073 to 1250,” Berliner indologische Studien 3, 103–127. van der Kuijp 1993 Leonard van der Kuijp, “Jayānanda. A Twelfth Century Guoshi from Kashmir Among the Tangut,” Central Asiatic Journal 37.3-4, 188-197. van der Kuijp 2003 Leonard van der Kuijp, “A Treatise on Buddhist Epistemology and Logic Attributed to Klong chen Rab ʼbyams pa (1308–1364) and Its Place in Indo-Tibetan Intellectual History,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 31, 381–437. Vetturini 2007 Gianpaolo Vetturini, The bKa' gdams pa School of Tibetan Buddhism. [Revised version of the Ph.D. thesis accepted in 2007 at SOAS, University of London]. http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/rarebooks/downloads/Gianpaolo_Vetturini_PhD.pd f. Vose 2009 Kevin Vose, Resurrecting Candrakīırti: Disputes in the Tibetan Creation of Prāsaṅgika. Boston: Wisdom Publications (Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism). Vose 2015 Kevin Vose, “Do Mādhyamikas See What the Rest of Us See? Early bKa’ gdams pas on “Commonly Appearing Subjects” (chos can mthun snang ba),” Journal of Buddhist Philosophy 1, 95–135. Wangchuk 2017 Tsering Wangchuk, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows – Tibetan Thinkers Debate the Centrality of the Buddha-Nature Treatise. Albany: SUNY Press. Werner 2014 Eric Werner, Phywa-pa Chos-kyi-seng-ge’s (1109–1169) Depiction of Māhāyāna Philosophy – A Critical Edition and Annotated Translation of the Chapters on Yogācāra and Mādhyamaka Philosophy from the gZhung lugs rnam ʾbyed, a Doxography of the Twelfth Century. Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts der Universität Hamburg (=MA thesis), unpublished. Ye shes rgyal mtshan - Se spyil bu baʾi rnam thar Ye shes rgyal mtshan, Se pyil bu baʾi rnam thar. In Lam rim bla ma brgyud paʾi rnam thar, Lhasa, 1990: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang (TBRC W1CZ2730), vol. 1, 272–275. 30