Endless Circles: Circumambulation in Tibet
by
Gong Shao
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts
Department of Anthropology
University of Alberta
© Gong Shao, 2014
ii
Abstract
Circumambulation is a universal cultural phenomenon. In Tibetan society, it is not only a
particularly religious practice, but also the ritual embodiment of the Tibetan ethos. This
research examines the types of circumambulation and their symbolic meanings in Tibet.
Through specific expressions in ethnographic accounts of circumambulation based on field
study and literature review, two core elements of circumambulation are identified: a center of
sacredness, and circular movement around this center. By analysis of the concept of
sacredness and the symbolic meanings of the circle and circular movement, I establish a
concentric circular model of circumambulation to interpret it in the Tibetan context. I use the
concept of sacred gravitation to explore the relationship between sacredness and people as
expressed in the form of circumambulation and how circumambulation acts as the symbolic
medium in this relationship.
iii
Preface
Research Ethics Approval
This thesis is an original work by Gong Shao. The research project, of which this thesis is a
part, received research ethics approval from the University of Alberta Research Ethics Board.
Project Name: Circumambulation in Tibet
ID: Pro00031340
Date: June 01, 2012-April 21, 2015.
Imaginary Tibet
Geographically, Tibet is a plateau region in Asia with an average elevation of 5,000 meters
and a harsh, oxygen-deficient, desert environment with extreme weather. It is famous for its
natural beauty, including Mt. Everest. Culturally, Tibet is a religious land where most people
piously believe in Tibetan Buddhism, or Bon. For most Western people, however, Tibet is the
symbol of peace and eternity, the kingdom of Buddhism, and the Shangri-La of the world and
of their own minds. Why is this faraway and exotic civilization so prevalent since the 1960s
in mainstream Western culture? The “Tibet” of Western societies is actually an imaginary
Tibet made by them and has become an inherent part of the knowledge of Oriental studies in
Western academia. This imaginary Tibet in popular Western culture usually comes with the
Dalai Lama, Tantra, erotic yoga, and sympathy for the political status of Tibet. Karl Marx, as
quoted in Edward Said’s Orientalism, said that: “They cannot represent themselves; they
must be represented” (Said 1979: xiii).
iv
Tibet has appeared in Western documents since as early as the 5th century BC. In Herodotus’
The Histories, it is mentioned that there was an ethnic group residing to the north of India and
a special kind of ant that could dig for gold sand (Kaschewsky 2001: 3). Similarly, Tibetan
oral traditions tell of gold-digging ants and also in Tibetan chronicles (Kaschewsky 2001: 3).
Although Tibet as a name did not exist in Herodotus, the terms Hai Bautai and Ho Bautisos,
respectively the name of a tribe and a river in Tibet, mentioned by Claudius Ptolemy in his
Geographia around 1st century AD (Kaschewsky 2001: 4). He also mentions a coppercolored mountain located in the Malaya mountain range which corresponds to
Padmasambhava’s copper-colored mountain palace (Kaschewsky 2001: 4). Although
scholars still debate whether Marco Polo ever arrived in China, we have good evidence that
he visited Amdo, a part of Tibet, according to his description of lamas’ magic. It was through
The Travels of Marco Polo that Europeans started to know more about Tibet (Shen 2010:
110).
The initial contact the Western world made with Tibet was because of the search for Prester
John (also known as Presbyter Johannes), a legendary medieval Christian king of Asia,
whose legends were popular in Europe from the 12th to 17th centuries. It was said that he
was a descendant of the Magi and ruled over a Christian nation in the Orient as a Christian
patriarch and king (Rachewiltz 1996: 61-63). According to different legends, Prester John
dwelled in different places: India, Central Asia, or Ethiopia (Rachewiltz 1996: 73). Some
missionaries believed that Tibetans were the descendants of Prester John and went to Central
Asia to find them. The legends of Prester John reflected Europeans’ fantastical dreams and
imaginings about the Orient, including the pursuit of wealth, missionary zeal, and also
obscure knowledge about Oriental civilizations (Taylor 1999: 1-3). Through these
processions of Christian dissemination in the Orient, missionaries collected original
v
documents about Tibet, first by compiling Tibetan dictionaries and building knowledge of
Tibet in Orientalism. To some extent, they built Tibetology in Europe.
During the Enlightenment, Oriental civilizations became more popular in European academia.
Many philosophers were interested in Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism, such as Jean-Jacques
Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Johann Gottfried Herder.
All have made positive or negative comments about the philosophy of Tibetan Buddhism and
its method of self-cultivation (Bishop 2001: 206-206, Dagyab Kyabgon Rinpoche 2001: 381382, Korom 2001: 177). At this time, interest in Tibet was still restricted to academia;
however, Helena Blavatsky and her Theosophical Society extolled Tibet to the Western
world in the late 19th century. Her beliefs was a forerunner of the New Age movement, and
one of her remarkable deeds was her self-proclaimed telepathic ability with lamas, saying that
all her compositions were written through telepathy. Although it has been proved that her
works were not actually related to Tibetan Buddhism, but rather a hodgepodge of Western
and Oriental occultism, her followers spread all over the world, including such celebrities as:
D. T. Suzuki, Alexandra David-Neel, Giuseppe Tucci, Carl Jung, and Edward Conze
(Pedersen 2001: 156-157).
In the 20th century, Tibet came into the popular view and the mass media of the Western
world. There were some landmark books and people publicizing the Tibetan culture during
this period. In 1927, Walter Evans-Wentz, follower of Helena Blavatsky, translated and
published The Tibetan Book of the Dead (Evans-Wentz 1927); this book has become one of
the classics of Oriental spiritualism, though many Tibetans do not know it. Another book was
the novel Lost Horizon (Hilton 1933) written by James Hilton in 1933. After the publication
of this book, Shangri-La, a fictional utopia, made Western readers believe that it is the
spiritual home for their minds, and it is Tibet where Shangri-La located (Hansen 2001: 104).
vi
By these means, the process of mythicizing Tibet had begun; dim impressions of Tibet turned
to conceptions of a peaceful, isolated Buddhist kingdom where people could escape from the
real world, especially after World War II.
According to Padmasambhava’s prophecy in the 8th century AD: “When the iron bird flies
and horses run on wheels, the Tibetan people will be scattered like ants across the face of the
earth, and the dharma will come the land of the red men” (Powers 1995: 186). After 1959,
when the Chinese government suppressed a Tibetan rebellion and the fourteenth Dalai Lama
fled Tibet to establish the Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamsala, India, Tibet started to
enter into the public view of the Western world. More and more Rinpoches came to Europe
and North America and built religious institutions to spread some of the secret cultivation
methods of Tibetan Buddhism, to laymen instead of only religious practitioners as
traditionally done before. To face modern society, Tibetan Buddhism has had to learn how to
adapt to westerners to survive. The archetypal example must be the Shambhala that was
founded by Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche in the 1970s. He founded the Shambhala Center and
created a secular practice combining the Tibetan Buddhism with other Oriental customs like
calligraphy and chanoyu—the Japanese tea ceremony—to attract and suit westerners
(Shambhala Offical Website 2014). His son and also the successor Sakyong Mipham
Rinpoche later named this new kind of Tibetan Buddhism as Shambhala Buddhism in 2000.
During the “Tibet fever” in Western society that started in the 1960s, a generation of
Tibetologists attracted to Tibetan Buddhism and supporting Tibetan freedom appeared in the
United States. Representative figures include Jeffery Hopkins and Robert Thurman. The
latter is the father of Hollywood star Uma Thurman, and was formerly a lama in Dharamsala;
he later returned to secular life and taught at Columbia University (Shen 2010: 121-122).
vii
Since the 1990s, some Western Tibetologists have started to rethink Tibet and criticize its
idolization.
Most Tibetologists rely mainly on text studies. However, nowadays the textual study is no
longer enough. As a student of anthropology, I hope I can contribute anthropological thought
and methodology to the study of Tibet and offer an outsider’s perspective. Tibet is an actual
society rather than a Shangri-La, and Tibetan people are actual human beings rather than
people of Buddha. In this thesis, I try to explore the Tibetan culture in an anthropological way
mainly based on literature review and participant observation.
viii
Acknowledgements
This thesis would not have been competed without the help and support of many people and
institutions. The first individual to whom I would like to express my gratitude is Dr. Jean
Debernardi, my supervisor and good friend. Working with Jean since 2011, I have really
enjoyed this student-teacher-friend relationship, something which is not common in China.
Her thoughtful care and encouragement of my work have enabled me to feel my worth in a
foreign country.
I have been more than lucky to have the opportunity to study at the University of Alberta
with funding offered by Department of Anthropology. During my study here, I have received
generous help from faculty and other graduate students who have made me feel at home in
Canada.
I want to give special thanks to Zhang Jian Lin, archaeologist at the Shaanxi Provincial
Archeological Research Institute, who is an expert in Tibetan archeology. He has never
stopped supporting my research since I started studying anthropology in 2006. Without his
help, I could not have started the fieldwork in Tibet. During my fieldwork in Lhasa, Habibu,
Shag Wangdu, and Norbu at the Tibet Institute of Cultural Heritage Protection, Professor
Zhang Hu Sheng of Tibet University, and Fan Jiu Hui supported me in my research.
In addition, I want to thank the members of my examination committee: Dr. Andie Palmer,
Dr. Stephen Kent and Dr. Gregory Forth, they gave me the pertinent and thoughtful
suggestions to my thesis, and I learned many things from them.
ix
Finally, I owe gratitude to my parents, who for all my life have understood me and supported
my choice of career
Table of Contents
Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... ii
Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... iii
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... viii
Chapter I. Introduction: Circumambulation in Anthropology and Tibetan Society .............. 1
Circumambulation in Anthropological Discourse ...................................................................... 2
Pilgrimage .......................................................................................................................................... 3
Sacredness .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Movement ..........................................................................................................................................11
Essential Concepts of Tibetan History and Religions..............................................................14
Religious Traditions before Buddhism.....................................................................................14
The Conflict between Bon and Buddhism ...............................................................................16
Tibetan Buddhism ...........................................................................................................................17
Reincarnation...................................................................................................................................19
Tibetan Society and Circumambulation .......................................................................................20
Framework of Present Study............................................................................................................30
Chapter II. Circumambulation of Natural Landscape ...................................................................36
Mountains: Mount Kailash ...............................................................................................................36
Lakes: Lake Manasarovar ................................................................................................................59
Chapter III. Circumambulation of Artificial Structure .................................................................68
Sacred City ............................................................................................................................................68
Nang Skor..........................................................................................................................................72
Bar Skor .............................................................................................................................................73
Rtse Skor ............................................................................................................................................74
Gling Skor .........................................................................................................................................75
Stod Skor and Smud Skor .............................................................................................................76
Sacred Monasteries ............................................................................................................................77
Chapter IV. Prayer Wheels as Micro Circuit ...................................................................................82
Chapter V. Interpretation of Circumambulation in Tibet ............................................................92
The Concept of Sacredness in Tibetan Culture ..........................................................................92
Symbolic Meaning of the Circle and Circular Movement ......................................................96
A Concentric Circle Model of Circumambulation in Tibet ................................................. 103
Religious Involution and Pragmatism ....................................................................................... 106
Chapter VI. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 108
Appendix. Tibetan Word List ............................................................................................................ 113
Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................... 116
Maps
Map 1. Topography of Tibet.. ...................................................................................................... 21
Map 2. Map of Greater Tibet. ...................................................................................................... 22
Map 3. The circumambulatory path of Mount Kailash. ............................................................... 50
Map 4. The circumambulatory path of Lake Manasarovar .......................................................... 64
Map 5. Nang Skor ........................................................................................................................ 73
Map 6. Bar Skor ........................................................................................................................... 74
Map 7. Rtze Skor.......................................................................................................................... 75
Map 8. Gling Skor. ....................................................................................................................... 76
Figures
Figure 1. Mount Kailash............................................................................................................... 43
Figure 2. Buddhist Cosmology..................................................................................................... 45
Figure 3. Mani stone..................................................................................................................... 51
Figure 4. Wind-horse flag ............................................................................................................ 53
Figure 5. Shiwa Tsal..................................................................................................................... 56
Figure 6. Tibetan woman prays at Droma La. .............................................................................. 57
Figure 7. Lake Manasarovar......................................................................................................... 60
Figure 8. Statue of Jowo Rinpoche. ............................................................................................. 78
Figure 9. Pilgrims do full body prostration in front of Jokhang Monastery. ................................ 79
Figure 10. Samye Monastery ....................................................................................................... 81
Figure 11. Outer appearance of prayer wheel .............................................................................. 85
Figure 12. Inner script of prayer wheel.. ...................................................................................... 85
Figure 13. Noodle soup wind prayer wheel ................................................................................. 86
Figure 14. The application “Prayer Wheel 3D” on iPhone. ......................................................... 87
Figure 15. Stationary prayer wheels around the Potala Palace.. .................................................. 90
Figure 16. Tibetan Wheel of Life.. ............................................................................................. 100
Figure 17. Symbols and Meaning of Wheel of Life. .................................................................. 101
Figure 18. Concentric Circle Model of Circumambulation in Tibet .......................................... 104
1
Chapter I. Introduction: Circumambulation in Anthropology and Tibetan
Society
This thesis offers an ethnographic account of the rituals of circumambulation and its patterns
in Tibetan society. It has been well recognized that religion is one of the most important
elements of Tibetan culture. The development of religions in Tibet has significantly
influenced its history, and just as religious philosophy shapes Tibetans’ behavior, vice versa
the behavior can express Tibetans’ thoughts. Circumambulation is also a prevalent ritual in
many other religions or cultures. A study of one specific ritual, therefore, provides us with the
means of understanding and interpreting the relation between behavior and thought structure
in a given society.
As a Han Chinese and non-Tibetan Buddhist, I probably never will be able to comprehend the
meaning and the significance of circumambulation as Tibetans do themselves, my interest in
this subject is rooted in my curiosity from my undergraduate studies. In 2006, I made an
important life decision: to study anthropology, which is a “minority major” in China, at a
university for ethnic minorities. In this university, I saw members of ethnic groups with my
own eyes rather than on television. Many of them have become my friends. I still can
remember the first time I saw a Tibetan student rotating his prayer wheel. I asked him why
Tibetans do this, and he answered that it is a custom. I was not satisfied with his answer and
kept this question in mind. After taking a course about Tibetan culture and visiting some
Tibetan Buddhist monasteries, I became increasingly interested in Tibet and its culture, and
so I decided on Tibet as my research area. For my graduation paper, I wrote an ethnographic
account of a Tibetan Buddhist monastery in my hometown, Xi’an. As anthropology is an
exotic major in China, I continued my anthropological exploration in Canada after graduation
2
in 2011 with the Master of Arts in Anthropology program at the University of Alberta. As a
thesis topic, I initially chose the Tibetan traditional painting—thangka1(tangka2)—but I could
not continue because of technical difficulties. Suddenly, the scene of the Tibetan student
rotating the prayer wheel came back to mind, and I decided to answer my previous question
myself.
After one year of study, I began to think rotating the prayer wheels is similar to
circumambulation to some extent—circular movement around the sacred center. Thus I
wanted to learn the reason that Tibetans prefer circumambulation as their method to practice
both daily prayer and pilgrimages, and how they regard places or objects as sacred. It is
important to study a particular culture from the ordinary peoples’ lives, not just from literary
or historical texts, so I went to Tibet for my fieldwork in the summer of 2012. Due to my
limited time and budget, I could not stay for a year or more, as is customary in
anthropological fieldwork. Therefore, I selected three representative locations—Lhasa,
Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar—to study circumambulation. During my one month of
fieldwork in Tibet, I talked with Tibetan people, went on the pilgrimage to the sacred
mountain and lake, and did the circumambulation myself, experiencing it with my body and
mind.
Circumambulation in Anthropological Discourse
The term circumambulate comes from the Latin circum ‘circle’ and ambulare ‘to walk’; it
especially means ‘to circle on foot ritualistically’ (Merriam Webster Online Dictionary). It is
Scroll of painting in Tibet.
Because it is difficult in many cases for nonspecialists to pronounce Tibetan words, I have used the simple phonetic
equivalents from the website of The Tibetan & Himalayan Library after their proper spelling when they first appear
in this thesis. See also an appendix after the main body of thesis.
1
2
3
a common ritual that can be seen in the major historical religions—Islam, Hinduism, Judaism,
Christianity, and Buddhism. It could be a “communal act of celebration of a particular deity”
or a “solitary or more solemn pilgrimage” (Larson 2010: 153), the latter best corresponds
with the individual self-cultivation I observed in Tibet. There is no specific anthropological
theory or paradigm that focuses especially on circumambulation, but it can be analyzed
through the lenses of many subfields of cultural anthropology, including economic
anthropology, the anthropology of tourism, the anthropology of religion and so on. As the
definition of circumambulation implies, abstractly it consists of two core elements: circular
movement and a sacred center. In this thesis, I aim to analyze and explain circumambulation
in the Tibetan context, drawing from anthropological discourse on pilgrimage, sacredness,
and movement.
Pilgrimage
What is pilgrimage? Scholars from different disciplines have considered pilgrimage from
various perspectives; however, there is no generally accepted definition. Human geographer
Robert H. Stoddard argues that a standardized definition of pilgrimage is “essential for
linguistic communication because the very basis of language involves the grouping of
individual elements into semantic categories” (Stoddard 1997: 42). By comparative analysis
of other scholars’ definitions, Stoddard extracts four elements of pilgrimage—distance of
movement, motivation, destination and magnitude—and thus gives his operational definition:
“an event consisting of longer than local journeys by numerous persons to a sacred places and
an act of religious devotion” (Stoddard 1997: 49).
Generally, the whole process of a pilgrimage should include preparation, a journey to a
sacred place, prayer, and the aftermath of the pilgrimage. Circumambulation usually is part of
4
prayer—walking all the way around the sacred place or sacred objects to pray or express
worship, such as Muslims’ circumambulation of the Kaaba after their journey to Mecca.
Therefore, in cultures in which circumambulation is considered a part of pilgrimage, it can be
addressed under the anthropological perspective of pilgrimage to some extent.
Anthropological theories of pilgrimage draw heavily on Arnold van Gennep’s well-known
work The Rites of Passage and Victory Turner’s symbolic interpretation of pilgrimage, which
developed van Gennep’s theory of the rites of passage. Van Gennep found a pattern of rites
“accompany a passage from one situation to another or from one cosmic or social world to
another” (van Gennep 1960: 10) and named them rites of passage, then subdivided them into
three categories: rites of separation (preliminal rites), transition rites (liminal rites), and rites
of incorporation (postliminal rites). There are then three phases of rites of passage: separation,
limen or margin, and aggregation. In the first phase, the ritual subject detaches from the
previous stable state by performing symbolic behavior; then the ritual subject’s state converts
into an ambiguous state, “betwixt and between all familiar lines of classification” (Turner and
Turner 1978: 2) during the second phase; in the third phase, the ritual subject returns to a
stable state again, but with new status. Van Gennep’s theory is a classical anthropological
method to analyze the rites of passage including funerals, marriage, adolescence ceremonies
and so forth. As for pilgrimage, he mentioned that the pilgrim could be incorporated into the
sacred world from the secular world by the preliminal rite before the departure to pilgrimage,
and then the pilgrim is “outside the ordinary life and in a transitional state until the return”
(van Gennep 1960: 184-185). As the first scholar to raise the concept of rites of passage, van
Gennep did not describe all the kinds of rite of passage or focus on all the stages of it in his
book; however, he created a new way to study the process of rituals. In some cultures,
5
circumambulation can be regarded as a rite of passage, for example, a Chinese pilgrim who
has circumambulated the Kaaba in Mecca could get a new status (Zhou and Yang 2007: 14).
Victor Turner developed van Gennep’s theory and extended the concept of the liminal phase
and focused on pilgrimages particularly. He considered pilgrimage as a liminoid ritual, as
Turner summarized:
Pilgrimage, then has some of the attributes of liminality in passage rites: release
from mundane structure; homogenization of status; simplicity of dress and behavior;
communitas; ordeal; reflection on the meaning of basic religious and cultural
values; ritualized enactment of correspondences between religious paradigms and
shared human experiences; emergence of the integral person from multiple
personae; movement from a mundane center to a sacred periphery which suddenly,
transiently, becomes central for the individual, an axis mundi of his faith;
movement itself, a symbol of communitas, which changes the time, as against stasis,
which represents structure; individuality posed against the institutionalized milieu;
and so forth. But since it is voluntary, not an obligatory social mechanism to mark
the transition of an individual or group from one state or status to another within
the mundane sphere, pilgrimage is perhaps best thought of as “liminoid” or “quasiliminal”, rather than “liminal” in Van Gennep’s full sense. (Turner and Turner 1978:
34-35)
A significant aspect of liminality is its capability to generate communitas “a relational quality
of full unmediated communication, even communion” with other people, “which combines
the qualities of lowliness, sacredness, homogeneity, and comradeship” (Turner and Turner
6
1978: 250). However, Turner considers pilgrimage without its particular context and regards
it as an autonomous entity existing outside of the rest of society. Many other ethnographic
accounts from varied cultures challenge Turner’s approach by showing that experiences of
communitas are largely absent from specific pilgrimages (Badone and Roseman 2004: 4). In
Tibetan society, which has special concepts of time and space, some parts of Turner’s theory
may not be applicable. Buffetrille finds that the quality of communitas is generally not
present in Tibetan society, as differences in social status persist during the pilgrimage
(Buffetrille 2004: 2), and to some Tantric practitioners, the pilgrimage is a highly
individualistic practice to establish relationships with their own particular deities, rather than
the group event emphasized by Turner.
Although Buddhism has significantly influenced Tibet, there is no specific term for
pilgrimage in Buddhism; one reason for this is that the idea of emptiness or void “implies
undifferentiated space and is thus deconstructive of sacred geography” (Naquin and Yü: 1992:
5). In a Tibetan context, the basic concepts of what a “pilgrimage” is do not correspond well
with the definition of that word in English as ‘a journey to a sacred place’. Nor do they
correspond entirely with the Sanskrit terms pradakshina ‘moving clockwise’ or yatra
‘journey’. In Tibetan, the term for pilgrimage is gnas skor (né kor), meaning ‘going around a
gnas’ and gnas mjal (né jel) ‘to encounter or meet a gnas’ (Huber 1993: 19). The word gnas
refers to sacred objects including places, people, and so on, as I will discuss in the following
section. In this sense, the English terms “circumambulation” or “pilgrimatic
circumambulation” correspond better with the Tibetan meaning of pilgrimage.
7
Sacredness
From the perspective of sacredness, a pilgrimage is a journey in a specific way to a specific
place during a specific time. For example, in Islam, the Hajj pilgrimage refers to “observance
of specified places in or near Mecca in Arabia, at a specified time” (Al Naqar 1972: xv, cited
in Bhardwaj 1997: 2). If Muslims perform a journey to places other than Mecca or at
different time then, it is not the Hajj. Here, the words “specific” or “specified” could refer to
sacred. With regard to circumambulation, it is a circular movement around the sacred objects
including space, buildings, people, things, and landscape during a sacred time. We can
analyze the sanctity from two perspectives: sacred objects and sacred time. As Paul Larson
said:
In the act of marking off a space through physically walking its circumference,
humans create a boundary between the sacred and the profane or mundane aspects
of their world. In the course of the journey of circumscribing a space, the person or
group exists in sacred time. (Larson 2010: 153)
In terms of the sacredness of objects, there is not a sharp boundary between “sacred” and
“non-sacred”. In order to rate the sanctity, scholars have employed several methods, such as:
(1) statements in sacred texts, places mentioned as sacred in indigenous literature being
accepted as sacred places of pilgrimage (Salomon 1979, cited in Stoddard 1997: 47); (2)
empirical data that pertain to number of pilgrims or to distance traveled, a larger number of
pilgrims or longer distance of travel indicating the higher sacredness (Stoddard 1997: 47);
and (3) opinions of pilgrims, measuring the sacredness based on emic knowledge (Stoddard
1997: 47). However, sacredness is not an easy element to analyze quantitatively. All methods
mentioned above have their deficiencies: (1) sacred texts do not explain the emergence of
8
new sacred places, and this method cannot be employed in societies without written language;
(2) data pertaining to pilgrim numbers is circular reasoning, namely in that, a place is
considered sacred because pilgrims go there and the reason pilgrims go to there is because it
is sacred (Stoddard 1997: 47); (3) some pilgrims do not quite know the reason for a thing’s
sacredness or can only give simple answers, so if we rely only on these answers, we cannot
make in-depth interpretations.
Sacredness is a factor that attracts pilgrims. Scholars use the term “magnitude” or “spiritual
magnetism” to define this factor. James Preston uses the term “spiritual magnetism” to
explain “the power of a pilgrimage shrine to attract devotees” (Preston 1992: 33), and argues
that “places of pilgrimage are endowed with spiritual magnetism by association with: (1)
miraculous cures, (2) apparitions of supernatural beings, (3) sacred geography, and (4)
difficulty of access” (Preston 1992: 33). However, this one-dimensional term only gives the
reason for attraction and is deficient in explaining how it affects pilgrims’ behavior. Preston
attempts to create a methodology to study sacredness of pilgrimage by this term, but the
elements of this “spiritual magnetism” are too generalized or too limited to be employed well
in particular cases such as circumambulatory pilgrimage in Tibet. Therefore, I prefer to use
the term “sacred gravity” to explain the sacredness that attracts people to circumambulate in
the Tibetan context, as I will explain in Chapter V.
I am not going to discuss how to measure the absolute degree of sacredness of objects in this
thesis; I consider sacredness to be a relative concept, meaningful to different people in
different cases, making it impossible to measure quantitatively. My aim in discussing the
Tibetan case is to discuss what sacredness is in Tibet, the relative relationships between
9
sacred objects and pilgrims, and how sacred objects attract people and how pilgrims worship
them.
Eliade argues that sacredness “manifests itself, shows itself, as something wholly different
from the profane” and uses the term “hierophany” to indicate “something sacred shows itself
to us” (Eliade 1959: 11). However, this sacredness needs to be understood in its own cultural
milieu. He expresses this hierophany by an example of stone:
By manifesting the sacred, any object becomes something else, yet it continues to
remain itself, for it continues to participate in its surrounding cosmic milieu. A
sacred stone remains a stone; apparently (or, more precisely, from the profane point
of view), nothing distinguishes it from all other stones. But for those to whom a
stone reveals itself as sacred, its immediate reality is transmuted into a supernatural
reality. In other words, for those who have a religious experience all nature is
capable of revealing itself as cosmic sacrality. (Eliade 1959: 12)
So what is sacredness, and how it is expressed in the Tibetan milieu? Toni Huber discusses
this in detail in his doctoral dissertation What Is a Mountain (Huber 1993). Tibetans believe
that the bla (la), ‘the vitality’ or ‘life-power’ exists everywhere in the world, including both
person and place, and where this bla exists it is called gnas. So the gnas is not only restricted
as a sacred place, but the gnas could be any sacred object such as a person, mountain, lake,
stone, etc. (Huber 1993: 14-16). The gnas expresses the internal sacredness of bla by an
external form. In addition, there is no specific term for a pilgrimage center as distinct from a
shine, monastery, sanctuary, or church in English (Naquin and Yü: 1992: 3), and in Tibet, the
term gnas also has the meaning of ‘center’ or ‘centrality’.
10
In terms of sacred time, there are two aspects of it that must be considered: when does sacred
time occur and how is time conceived of? Eliade argues that sacred time is “a primordial
mythical time made present” (Eliade 1959: 68). Therefore, sacred time is usually connected
with the saints and important events, such as birth-dates of religious leaders and the date of
the foundation of the religion. Sacred time can make a normal place become sacred and make
a sacred place become more sacred. For example, in China, some people burn paper money
for their dead relatives during the Qing Ming Festival to memorialize them; at this time, the
places where they burn paper money become sacred. In the Year of the Horse in the Tibetan
calendar, Mount Kailash becomes more sacred, and thus people can gain 13 times the usual
merit3 by circumambulating it.
The concept of time varies in different cultures; roughly, these concepts can be divided into
two categories—linear time and circular or cyclical time. Linear time is a concept in which
time is conceived of as a line from start to end; the Bible, for instance, proposes that time
exists from the creation of the world to a final apocalypse. However, in some cultures, time is
prevalently described in circular terms, for instance as a wheel which is turning forever
without end, as in both Mayan tradition and Hinduism. In Tibetan Buddhism, the term “khor
ba” (kor wa), a translation of the Sanskrit term “samsara”, refers to the wheel of birth and
rebirth. Tibetans accumulate merit through Buddhist practice to wish for better living
conditions in the next life. In this way, circumambulation is a ritual that fits their concept of
time perfectly, and it indicates that concept ritually in a material form.
3 One essential concept in Buddhism (the Sanskrit term is punya), people can gain merits by doing good deeds and
thus be reborn in a different position of samsara the wheel of life in the next life or gain liberation to escape from
samsara.
11
Movement
No matter the religion or the terminology used to describe a religious journey, there is one
aspect that applies to all types of pilgrimage, namely, the physical movement from home to
the sacred place (Bhardwaj 1997: 2). In the course of my literature review, an anthropological
perspective from a walking study enlightened me. It focuses on the walking itself and tries to
explain the diversity of walking practices in the places where anthropologists and others work
(Vergunst and Ingold 2008: xi). The representative scholar is Tim Ingold, who states it is rare
to find ethnography that reflects on walking itself and asserts a way of walking does not
merely express thoughts and feelings that have already been imparted through an education in
cultural precepts and proprieties. It is itself a way of thinking and of feeling, through which,
in the practice of pedestrian movement, these cultural forms are continually generated (Ingold
2008: 2-3). This provides a good way to think about circumambulation, abstracting the
circumambulation from its function in ritual, and hence concentrating on itself as a way of
walking or movement. By this means, it offers a universal perspective for thinking about
circumambulations of different cultures.
Throughout the Tibetan language, agro (adro) ‘going’ is an important concept and the root of
many words. In Tibetan, the concept of being is linked with going:
A living being is a aGro Ba [adro ba] (“go one”) or, in the aggregate, aGro Ba
Rigs Drug [adro ba rik druk] (“six classes of goers”). Buddha is called aGro Bai
Bla Ma [adro bai la ma] (“high one of the goers”), and Avalokitesvara is known as
aGro Bai mGon Po [adro bai gön po] (“lord of the goers”). Man is variously called
aGro Ba Rin Chen [adro ba rin chen] (“great-value goers”), aGro mCHog [adro
chok] (“perfect goers”), or Langs aGro [lang adro] (“erect goer”). Animals are Dud
12
aGro [dü adro] (“stooping goer”); birds are PHur aGro [pur adro] (“flying goer”);
frogs are mCHong aGro [chong adro] (“jumping goer”); fish are rKyal aGro [kyel
adro] (“swimming goer”); worms are NYal aGro [nyel adro] (“lying-down goer”);
and snakes are lTo aGro [to adro] (“belly goer”). The fairies, or dakini, of the sky,
about whom the Tibetans learned from the Hindus, are not characterized as living
in the sky but, in accordance with one of their attributes, as mKhaa aGro Ma [kha
adro ma] (“sky-going females”). (Ekvall 1964: 228-229)
This linguistic evidence indicates the importance of walking in Tibetan culture and provides a
clue as to why Tibetans prefer circumambulation—to gain liberation by walking.
The way one walks is affected by one’s environment. In his Being Alive: Essays on
Movement, Knowledge and Description, Ingold states that movement is “a mechanical
displacement of human body across the surface of the earth, from one point to another, and
that knowledge is assembled from observations taken from these points” (Ingold 2011: 17).
In this perspective, the particular culture can interact with its way of walking or movement of
people. Ingold uses a comparison between European and Japanese dance to show this
interaction:
Whereas the European, as I have already observed, walks from the hips while
keeping the legs as straight as possible, Japanese people traditionally walked from
the knees while minimizing movement at the hips […] European dancers aspire to
verticality, using their feet like stilts, a posture taken to its most stylized extreme in
classical ballet where the female dancer balances on the tips of her toes, arm
stretched heavenwards, while her male partner, with his leaps and bounds,
13
temporarily loses contact with the ground altogether. Japanese dancers, by contrast,
through flexible movement of the knees, drag their feet across the smooth floor in a
shuffling motion, without ever lifting their heels. (Ingold 2011: 40)
The particular style of Japanese dance comes from a particular style of walking, and a
particular environment affects the walking style. Walking from the knees is very effective on
rough or hilly terrain in Japan because the lower center gravity reduces the risk of tripping
and falling; in addition, the method of carrying heavy loads suspended from a long, supple
pole resting athwart the shoulders makes this form of walking very ergonomic (Ingold 2011:
40). In the case of Tibet, due to the deficiency of oxygen and low temperature caused by
high altitude, Tibetans’ energy consumption is higher than people who live in low-lying areas,
and that is also the reason they prefer high-calorie foods like yak butter. In terms of walking,
their pace is comparatively slower than people who live in low-altitude areas, though it is still
much faster than travelers in Tibet. When walking in mountainous areas, the axiom that the
shortest distance between two points is a straight line is usually inapplicable. If you insist on
walking straight then, you would never arrive at your destination because of obstacles, or it
would cost you much more time and energy. Since it is almost impossible to walk directly
across, the roughly circular shapes of mountains and lakes force people to walk around; in
religious context, this becomes circumambulation.
In addition, this circular way of movement is compatible with the Buddhist philosophy of
samsara, which considers life to be the cycle of death and rebirth, in which people are reborn
in six different realms depending on their karma from previous lives. Circumambulation
symbolizes this outlook on life, namely endless circles without start and end.
14
Essential Concepts of Tibetan History and Religions
To understand Tibetan culture, we cannot separate it from religion, which has permeated
almost every aspect of Tibetan culture: literature, art, architecture, and Tibetan people's daily
life. Looking through the history of Tibet, we can find it is a history of religions to some
extent. Similarly, Tibetan history has been passed down orally or through written works by
religious practitioners because of their monopoly on knowledge and education, especially
after the 7th century AD when Buddhism came into Tibet and gradually gained dominance.
Therefore, Tibetan historical texts have a strong Buddhist tendency and inflection. It is hard
to find what facts are in Tibetan history, this would require extensive textural research which
is beyond the scope of this thesis. I do not intend to give the whole history of Tibet here.
Instead, I will give some essential concepts to help understand the topic of my thesis.
Religious Traditions before Buddhism
Written Tibetan history can be traced back to the 7th century following the invention of the
Tibetan alphabet during the period of the Tibetan Empire (Tsering 2007: 52-54). However,
the written history of ancient Tibetan is filled with much mythological and religious doctrine,
and Tibetan archaeology is still a relatively new topic in China, making it difficult to get an
accurate history of ancient Tibet before the 7th century. From other references from Chinese,
Tibetan, and Indian sources, scholars have suggested that the development of the Tibetan
state may have begun with some small pastoral tribes (McKay 2003: 18), that then formed a
centralized “state” named Zhang Zhuang located in the northwest of the Tibetan Plateau with
the territory including almost the whole of Tibet in the period prior to the formation of the
Tibetan Empire in the 7th century (Tsering 2007: 21-23). Zhang Zhuang was more like a
tribal confederacy without fixed political and administrative centers than a state in modern
15
Western understanding. It is also the place where the indigenous religion in Tibet, Bon,
originated (McKay 2003: 18).
Bon was the prevalent religious tradition in Tibet before Tibetan Buddhism. There are still
many debates on its origin and early history due to a lack of written records. According to
Bon sources, a mystical figure, Shenrab Miwoche, who was the prince of Zhang Zhuang,
founded it in a place called Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring, which could refer to parts of the wider
Persian Empire. However, the earliest surviving documents indicate Bon as a religion only
dates from the 9th or 10th century AD (Powers &Templeman 2012: 100). Literally, the word
“bon” (bön) means ‘chant repeatedly’ (Tsering 1996: 67); the term “Bon” can refer to three
distinct traditions in the context of Western scholarship according to Per Kværne: (1) the preBuddhist religion of Tibet related to the worship of sacred and supernatural kings, which is
essentially distinct from Buddhism; (2) a religion that appeared in Tibet in the 10th and 11th
centuries that has significant similarities to Buddhism with regard to doctrine and practice; or
(3) a vast variety of popular beliefs including divination, the cult of local deities and concepts
of the soul (Kværne 1995: 9-10).
Following the rising of a tribe in the Yarlung River Valley in South Tibet, a powerful state
was founded around the 6th century, namely the Tibetan Empire (Tsering 2007: 44-59).
Following Tibetan tradition, there are 42 kings of the Tibetan Empire, the earliest 27 kings
had a close relationship with Bon and governed the empire through its power in religious
respects (Haarh 2003: 144; Wang 1987: 1-2). But this situation changed following the arrival
of Buddhism in Tibet.
16
The Conflict between Bon and Buddhism
Songtsan Gampo, the thirty-third king of the Tibetan Empire, introduced Buddhism from
India and China to Tibet by his marriage with Nepalese Princess Bhrikuti and Chinese
Princess Wen Cheng (Huang 2010: 17-23). In addition, the written form of the Tibetan
language was created during his reign and he requested monks from India, China, Nepal and
Kashmir to translate the Buddhist texts into Tibetan (Huang 2010: 24-30). These two events
established the foundation for the formation and propagation of Tibetan Buddhism, and also
led to the struggle between Bon and Buddhism.
During this conflict, although they clashed with each other, they meanwhile absorbed each
other’s quintessence. When Buddhism was first introduced into Tibet, Bon was dominant in
Tibetan society. To encourage its acceptance, Buddhism borrowed many things from Bon and
transferred them into Buddhist practice. For example, Buddhism absorbed the concept of
mountain deities and converted them into the protective deities of Buddhism (Tsering 2008:
65). In the late 8th century, however, King Trisong Detson greatly supported Buddhism and
in the meantime eradicated Bon; thus Bon started to wane (Shakbpa 2010: 130-133). In order
to revive, Bon began to learn from Buddhism. In the 9th century, Buddhism also faced a
catastrophe of its own: King Langdarma started to support Bon and eradicated Buddhism.
His anti-Buddhist activities led to the waning of Buddhism, finally leading to his being
assassinated by a Buddhist monk (Shakbpa 2010: 162-163). Following this, the Tibetan
Empire collapsed and stepped into the so-called Era of Fragmentation (842-1264).
This period gave both Bon and Buddhism the opportunity to revive. From the 10th to the 11th
centuries, with the discovery of the gter ma (ter ma) ‘hidden treasures’, which were believed
to be textual classics buried by saints previously to protect them from disaster, Bon was
17
restored and gradually formed its theoretical system. In the meanwhile, Buddhism was
reintroduced from Amdo and Nagri to central Tibet and its restoration began with the
development of Vinaya and the gradual formation of the sects of Tibetan Buddhism (Tsering
2008: 64-66). After this period, Tibetan Buddhism became the dominant religion, having a
great effect on politics. Although Bon survived, it utterly lost its religious dominance.
Therefore practitioners of Bon retained an implacable hatred for Buddhism, which was
expressed in the reversal of Buddhist custom, such as circumambulation and prayer wheels
rotation being performed in a counter-clockwise direction (Kværne 2003: 474).
Tibetan Buddhism
In the history of Buddhism, a first schism in the Sangha4 happened after the nirvana of
Buddha between the Sthaviravada5 and Mahasangha6. Sthviravada gradually developed into
Hinayana or ‘Lesser Vehicle’ schools, primarily represented today by Theravada Buddhism
in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, its central goal being nirvana or freedom from samsara, the
cycle of rebirth. Mahasangha gradually developed into Mahayana Buddhism or ‘Great
Vehicle’ schools, represented today throughout China, Tibet, and East Asia. It emphasizes the
veneration of Bodhisattvas, humans who had achieved Buddhahood but refused to enter
nirvana until they had saved all other sentient beings. In the later phase of development of
Mahayana Buddhism, it absorbed many Tantric doctrines and practices including mantra,
yoga, magic ritual, and techniques of meditation, thus forming the Vajrayana Buddhism, also
named Tantric Buddhism (Skilton 1997: 135), represented today in Tibet, Nepal, Japan, and
Indonesia. Since its doctrine is significantly symbolic and virtually unintelligible without
teaching and commentary from a guru, this tradition is also known as Esoteric Buddhism
compared to previous Mahayana doctrine.
The Buddhist community of monks and nuns.
One school of early Buddhism, literally means teaching of elders .
6 One school of early Buddhism, literally means great sangha .
4
5
18
Tibetan Buddhism is primarily derived from India, consisting of the philosophy of Mahayana,
ritual practice of Vajrayana and the traditional beliefs of Bon, which are its three core
elements. Due to its significant difference from traditional Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism
used to be called Lamaism or “Civilized Shamanism” (Samuel 1993, cited in Shen 2010: 47).
Besides the study of Buddhist theories and classics like other traditions of Buddhism, Tibetan
Buddhism has innumerable Tantric ritual practices. Following White’s definition:
Tantra is that Asian body of beliefs and practices which, working from the principle
that the universe we experience in nothing other than the concrete manifestation of
the divine energy of the godhead that creates and maintains that universe, seeks to
ritually appropriate and channel that energy, within the human microcosm, in
creative and emancipatory ways. (White 2000: 9)
Tibetan Buddhists employ techniques for personal spiritual cultivation as the one path to
Buddhahood. These practices, including rituals, meditations, and yoga, are quite elaborate
and esoteric. Tantric practices are considered as the fastest and most convenient way of
cultivation to achieve Buddhahood. Traditionally, only when the practitioners finished the
study of Mahayana dharma are they allowed to study the Tantric practices under the
mentorship of gurus. As for laymen believers, it is difficult to attain the authentic Tantric
practices. However, as the Tibetan diaspora spread Tibetan Buddhism worldwide, the
prerequisites for Tantric practices have lowered in order to suit Western practitioners, and
they are now much more accessible for common people.
Currently, Tibetan Buddhism has four main sects, schools, orders, or traditions: Nyingma,
Kagyu, Sakya, and Geluk. It is usual to add the word “pa” (pa) or “ba” (ba) to these to refer
to practitioners of these sects in English. Throughout history, all these sects or their
19
tributaries dominated Tibet both religiously and politically, except Nyingmapa. Eventually,
Gelukpa gained power in Tibet with the military help of the Mongols in 1642, and their head,
the Dalai Lama, became the ecclesiocratic leader of Tibet (Wang 1987: 178-182). Gelukpa
kept its dominance, and in 1959 the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet to establish the Tibetan
Government in Exile in the Indian city of Dharamsala.
Reincarnation
Reincarnation is an important concept in Tibetan Buddhism and cultures. Its theoretical
foundations are animism from Bon and samsara from Buddhism (Chen 2008: 31). It is
believed that life consists of body and soul, and when the current body dies, the soul will be
reincarnated in a new body through the state known as bardo (bardo) ‘intermediate state’.
Depending on one’s karma, one will be reborn in different forms, namely the six realms in
the circle of rebirth. This concept of the soul is different from the Western philosophy; John
Blofeld describes the difference as follows:
This belief is too alien to the Western tradition to be easily acceptable by the heirs
of a Christian or Moslem culture, but it is something that is taken for granted by
about half the human race, for Hindus, Taoists and other besides Buddhists,
subscribe to it. Though impossible to verify, it is not illogical. There is less logic in
the theistic belief which postulates an infinite extension of life in the future for
beings who had a finite origin, for it is reasonable to suppose that what had a
beginning must have an end. Everything observable (matter and energy) is subject
to change but never to creation out of nothing nor to total extinction, and it seems
more likely than not that the same laws apply to what is not observable.
Incidentally, acceptance of the doctrine of rebirth makes it easy to arrive at
20
tentative explanations of many problems insoluble in terms of environment or
heredity. (Blofeld 1992: 56)
In the development of Tibet Buddhism, each sect faced the problem of choosing an heir to
inherit dharma and power. Some sects adopted the method of blood relationship, like
Sakyapa. In the 13th century, one tributary of Kagyu, Karma Kagyu, first created the system
of inheritance through reincarnation. Following this, all other sects except Sakyapa gradually
adopted it (Norbu 1992: 72). The reincarnated Tibetan Buddhist practitioner is known as
tulku (tuku) ‘reincarnation’, or huo fo ‘living Buddha’ in Chinese. When one tulku dies, a
child is chosen as that person’s reincarnation following prophecies and tests. After years of
education, this child becomes the new leader and the lineage continues in this way.
In practical terms, reincarnation is a way to continue power and maintain a political balance.
However, it is also the means by which Tibetan Buddhism carries out a circular philosophy.
High level practitioners can circulate and inherit their powers and memories by reincarnation;
laymen, however, collect merit to gain good rebirth in samsara through circumambulation
and spinning prayer wheels, which are symbolic and physical metaphors for reincarnation in
my opinion. Philosophically, circumambulation shares this concept, but it is performed in a
different way which I will discuss in the following chapters.
Tibetan Society and Circumambulation
Tibet, or bod (bö) in Tibetan, is located in the Tibetan Plateau to the northeast of the
Himalayas. Scholars thought the term “Tibet” either derived from the Tibetan term stod bod
(tö bö) for ‘upper Tibet’ or from the early Indian name bhot for ‘Tibet’ (French 2010: 2). It is
21
the highest region on Earth, with an elevation of 5,000 meters above sea level, on average. If
imagining Tibet like a clock, from its twelve o’clock position, it is surrounded by enormous
mountain masses clockwise: the Kunlun Mountains, Tanggula Mountains, Bayan Har
Mountains, Hengduan Mountains, and Himalayas. The climate of Tibet is generally dry and
cool because the Himalayas block the wet monsoon from the south, and the high elevation
results in low temperatures. The Tibetan Plateau is the sources of the main rivers in China,
South Asia, and Southeast Asia, including the Yellow River, Yangtze River, Mekong,
Salween River, Brahmaputra River, and Indus River.
Map 1. Topography of Tibet. Source: China Tourist Maps.
As an influential civilization in Central Asia, Tibet has acculturated its neighboring areas
through Tibetan Buddhism. In China, the traditional Tibetan cultural area or Greater Tibet as
claimed by the Tibetan Government in Exile is the area including Ü-Tsang, Amdo and Kham,
which are the present-day Tibet Autonomous Region, Qinghai Province, two Tibetan
22
Autonomous Prefectures of Aba and Ganze and a Tibetan Autonomous County, Muli in
Sichuan Province, a Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Gannan and a Tibetan Autonomous
County, Tianzu in Gansu Province, and a Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Deqin in Yunnan
Province. The total area of Greater Tibet is 2.5 million square kilometers. However,
according to information offered by the Central People’s Government of the People’s
Republic of China, the total area of Tibet is only the area of the Tibet Autonomous Region,
which is 1.2022 million square kilometers (official website of Central Tibetan
Administration). This is to say that the Chinese government does not accept the concept of
Greater Tibet.
Map 2. Map of Greater Tibet. Source: Central Tibetan Administration.
According to the statistical data of the 2010 China Population Census, the population of the
Tibetan people is 6,282,187 in the People’s Republic of China, and among them there are
2,716,388 in the Tibet Autonomous Region (Department of Population 2010). Besides that,
23
there is a Tibetan diaspora around the world. Tibetans speak the Tibetan language, which
belongs to the Sino-Tibetan language family and includes three main dialects: Ü-Tsang
Tibetan (Central Tibetan), Amdo Tibetan, and Khams Tibetan (Yang 2003: 197). With the
policy of generalization of standard Chinese (pu tong hua) in China and the ethnic policy, the
official languages in the Tibet Autonomous Region, autonomous prefectures, and
autonomous counties are Tibetan and standard Chinese. In my fieldwork, I found that most
Tibetan officers and businessmen in cities and towns can speak standard Chinese in order to
work or for business. However, most Han Chinese cannot speak Tibetan or can only speak
several simple words and sentences, although policy requires that officers who work in Tibet
must learn Tibetan. In rural mountain and pasturing areas, indigenous people can only speak
Tibetan and some simple Chinese words.
The traditional livelihood of Tibet is herding and agriculture (Yang 2003: 204). The most
important livestock is the yak. Tibetans have domesticated yaks for their every part. Their
meat can be eaten; yak butter is used for making the most popular Tibetan beverage, yak
butter tea, and for butter flower sculptures and monastery offerings, where it is used as lamp
fuel; yak hides are used for making felts; the feces are used for fuel and for cleaning bowls;
the skeleton is used for making talismans. The high altitude has an excellent carrying
capacity for this animal. Hulless barley is the main crop in Tibet, which is used for cooking
tsampa (tsampa) — the main food of Tibetans—a mixture of stirred hulless barley with yak
butter tea (Yang 2003: 209). It is easily preserved and easy to make; with tsampa and yaks,
Tibetans can make long-distance journeys. Although the yak’s usage as transportation has
decreased with the spread of vehicles, it is still irreplaceable in mountain areas.
The Tibetan people, or as they called themselves, bodpa (bö pa), which means ‘the people of
Tibet’, are the native ethnic group in Tibet. In terms of their origin, there are at least ten
24
scholarly hypotheses, including origins in India and Iran (Gele 1988: 44). Although no
consensus has yet been reached, it is generally agreed that ancient humans immigrated to the
Tibetan Plateau from other places. Archaeological evidence has proved that human beings
have resided in Tibet since the Upper Paleolithic (Huo 2010: 59), and recent molecular
biological evidence confirms that “the majority of Tibetan matrilineal components can trace
their ancestry to Epipaleolithic and Neolithic immigrants from northern China during the
mid-Holocene” (Zhao 2009: 21230).
As previously mentioned, the main religious beliefs in Tibet are Tibetan Buddhism and Bon.
Generally, most Tibetans are pious believers, and religious practices fill up their life,
although some young people have lost interest in religion. From the perspective of difficulty
and walking distance, the longest and hardest one-way religious practice is pilgrimage to
sacred places; however, the shorter and the easier one is circumambulation, which is more
frequent and actually the longest in total. In Tibetan, circumambulation is called skor ra (kor
ra) or bskor ba (korwa) ‘to go in a circuit’, the “b” of ba usually disappears in most dialects,
and so it is also often written as bskor ra (kor ra) (Ekvall 1964: 230); it also means the path
for circumambulation (Larsen and Sinding-Larsen 2001: 46). One important thing to mention
here is that unlike how the English word circumambulation emphasizes walking on foot,
bskor ba, ‘to go in a circuit’ emphasizes circuitous motion rather than walking on foot. In fact,
I observed Tibetans paid more attention to the circular shape of movement rather than the
means of movement. Similarly, the Chinese words Tibetans use to express circumambulation
zhuan jin ‘go around script’ and zhuan fo ‘go around Buddha’, zhuan shan ‘go around
mountain’ or zhuan hu ‘go around lake’ depending on the different objects do not emphasize
walking on foot. In addition, the word bskor (kor) is also used when one turns a wheel
(Ekvall 1964: 230). For this reason, I argue that the rotation of prayer wheels can be
25
classified as circumambulation, or to be more exact, a related form of circuit going in the
Tibetan context, as I will discuss in Chapter IV. However, the word circumambulation has
become a convention in this area of research in the English literature, and so I will still use
this term in this work.
For most other religious believers, pilgrimage is perhaps aspiration at best rather than an
everyday religious practice, especially in the times before the popularization of modern
transportation. Money to support the pilgrimage is not the only difficulty; pilgrims may face
robbery, atrocious weather, starvation, and many unexpected events in their journey (Turner
1978: 7). Some Tibetans will convert all their assets to go to Lhasa, some even by begging;
some never arrive at their destination. Death on the pilgrimage is also regarded as meritorious.
Unlike distance decay functions that apply to most regular human movement, in which the
greater the distance travelled is, the harder the journey becomes, in the pilgrimages of some
cultures, movement itself is a form of worship or sacrifice, the role of distance is no longer
considered as an obstacle, and becomes merit instead (Stoddard and Morinis 1997: X). For
Tibetans, travel to pilgrimage sites is the means of the pilgrimage instead of the aim. They
can increase the merit of their pilgrimage by increasing the difficulty of the travel—for
instance, by making the walking more challenging by repeatedly performing full body
prostration. Even so, more and more people tend to travel by modern transportation.
In broader terms, circumambulation is not just a particular ritual within pilgrimages, but it
also includes the circumambulatory practices of laymen in common life. Unlike the
circumambulation in a pilgrimage, this form is more relaxed, and obviously less effective in
accumulation of merit compared to that of a pilgrimage. However, as not everyone can be a
pilgrim to Lhasa, pious Tibetans increase the benefits of circumambulation by means of
26
increasing the frequency, difficulty, and duration. People circumambulate sacred objects
depending on their local situation, be it stupas, large prayer wheels, or monasteries, at least
once per day. Simply walking is not enough; they each will rotate a portable prayer wheel,
and in so doing perform a less difficult micro-circuit. They may also chant mantras while
walking, or even do a full body prostration while circumambulating in order to maximize
merit by increasing the difficulty of the act. In addition, some elders who do not need to work
will rotate prayer wheels while chanting silently all day, except when eating and sleeping.
There are no accurate historical sources about the origin of circumambulation in Tibet. Ekvall
argues that there was no circumambulation as a rite in Tibet before the introduction of
Buddhism, and that it came to Tibet at that point (Ekvall 1964: 226-228). In terms of
circumambulation in early Buddhism, Ekvall states that it began with the Buddha himself. In
support of this interpretation, Ekvall quotes from Buddhist scriptures that mention
circumambulation: “After he [the Buddha] had met the five ascetics, but before he began to
preach to them, and as preliminary to turning the wheel of the doctrine, he circumambulated
the three seats of the previous Buddhas and then sat in the fourth seat” (Ekvall 1964: 227).
However, as Wylie observes, many ritual practices arose long after the death of the historical
Buddha, and the ritual is more likely to have had a later origin (Wylie 1966: 42).
An anecdote from an 11th century biography of Atisa7 mentions that Atisa performed aerial
circumambulation in the Samye Monastery and he instructed his Tibetan disciples how to do
circumambulation (Stoddard 1999: 176). In Tibetan texts, at the beginning of the 12th
century, Milarepa’s8 disciple Gampopa invited Jikten Gonpo, and Lingrepa sent disciples to
Mount Kailash to take retreat and meditate. One of these disciples, Gonpodorjie created the
circumambulation path of Mount Kailash (Tsering 1996: 76). From these accounts, we may
7He
8
is a famous Buddhist master from the Pala Empire in Bengal who spread Buddhist in Tibet in the 11th century.
He is one of the main luminaries of the Kagyupa.
27
infer that circumambulation of Mount Kailash was practiced by the 12th century. In addition,
circumambulatory pilgrimage seems testified to in the building of ambulatories around the
cellae of temples, the initial construction of which can be traced back to the 7th—10th
centuries (Buffetrille 1998: 19). The origins of this ritual are likely derived from Buddhism,
but there is no solid evidence so far. Since this is archaeologically difficult to reveal,
especially around a mountain or lake, more systematic textual studies are required to find the
answer to this question.
Currently, circumambulation is the most widespread religious practice or custom in Tibet;
people choose different scales of circumambulation depending on their various conditions
and wishes. Similar to the Tibetan term for circumambulation bskor ba ‘to go in a circuit’, the
Tibetan term for pilgrimage is called gnas skor, meaning ‘to go around the sacred place’ and
a pilgrim is called gnas skor ba (né kor ba), meaning ‘people who go around a sacred place’
(Buffetrille 1998: 19). Tibetans also call pilgrimage chao fo in Chinese, literally meaning
‘pilgrimage to Buddha or face to Buddha’. Therefore, in my opinion, for Tibetans pilgrimage
involves undertaking a long-distance and large-scale circuit, rather than circumambulation
being a mere part of pilgrimage. The further one must travel to the sacred place being
circumambulated, the greater the merit and benefits. At its largest scale in Tibet, circuiting or
circumambulation is done around sacred mountains and lakes; at its smallest scale circuiting
is the rotation of prayer wheels.
Traditionally, circumambulation is done while walking or walking with prostrations. Ekvall
also mentions two rare methods: on one’s knees and creeping on one’s belly (Ekvall 1964:
231). I did not see these methods when I was in Tibet; they might be exceptional, individual
cases. However, with the development of society, some people may choose new ways to
28
perform circuits, like using vehicles or other substitutes. As Buffetrille observed at A myes
rMa chen Mountain in Qinghai:
By 1990, a short portion of the route was suitable for motor vehicles but, at that
time there were no vehicles. Pilgrims on horseback, accompanied by their yaks,
formed small caravans. By 2002, the road linked two entrances of the pilgrimage
and a substantial number of pilgrims made the half circumambulation on
motorcycles, with prayers flags hung on the handlebars; others, more well to do,
were in cars. (Buffetrille 2004: 7)
The direction of circumambulation is also based on the natural circular movement of the sun.
In the Vedas, the term sunwise means the direction of the Sun’s movement—from east to
west through the south—that is, clockwise. In Buddhism, the position when the object faces
the south is called absolute position, which is the position in which to place statues or images
of Buddha (Nakamura 1951: 351-352). Therefore, Simpson also argues that the clockwise rite
of circumambulation originated in ideas and practices related to sun worship and the course
of the sun (Simpson 1896: 83). In one story reported in a Tibetan Buddhist text, Milarepa was
able to identify five female demons because they circumambulated in the opposite direction
from the Buddhists.
Fair maidens, seated to my left, you sisters, I must ask you questions. I have no
other aim but to know if you are human beings or demonesses […] I saw you come
like dazzling pearls upon a string… Are you phra men dakinis [tra men dakinis]?
The Buddhist way of circumambulation is from left to right. But yours is the
29
opposite way. Thus I know you are goddess-demons […] This demasks you as
enchanteresses! (Stoddard 1999: 209)
Less provocatively, counter-clockwise circumambulations can be attributed to Bon
practitioners. However, Huber argues that although the cliché “clockwise for Buddhists and
counterclockwise for Bon practitioners” is followed in practice, it is not necessarily always
the case. For example, Buddhists circumambulate counterclockwise at Mount Kongpo Bonri,
and Bon practitioners circumambulate clockwise around Mount Tsari, while all women do
half a circuit in each direction (Huber 1993: 19-21).
When talking about the function of circumambulation, common Tibetan pilgrims and most
Western scholars always mention accumulating merit. However, this is, to some extent, a
superficial and oversimplified explanation. Huber argues that in Tibetan tradition, the sacred
objects or gnas have the byin (jin) ‘empowerment’ to purify the sgrib (drip), literally
meaning ‘shadow or stain’. This physical and mental pollution or defilement is related to
substances and various actions, and to deities residing bodily and in the external world. For
Tibetans, sgrib and byin are fundamental aspects of a Tibetan formulation of relationships
between people, and between people and places, especially during pilgrimage (Huber 1993:
26-29). People circumambulate the sacred objects gnas to build a relationship with this
empowerment byin in order to purify the defilement sgrib.
In terms of the objects of the circumambulation, Ekvall roughly classifies them into persons,
images, scriptures, offerings, religious structures, topographical features, and noumenal
projections achieved by meditation (Ekvall 1964: 236-244). In this thesis, I will discuss
circumambulation in three categories from a natural and symbolic meaning, namely: (1)
30
natural landscapes which symbolize the whole world; (2) cities and monasteries as artificial
structure contain persons, images, scriptures and offerings; and (3) rotating prayer wheels
that abstractly symbolizes the core concept of all forms of circumambulation—circular
movement around the sacred center.
Framework of Present Study
The study of Tibet, or Tibetology, is an interdisciplinary study referring to anything Tibetan,
including history, religion, language, and so forth. Many disciplines contribute knowledge to
Tibetology. However, as Western exploration of Tibet started with missionaries who wanted
to spread Christianity, the earliest studies were of Tibetan language, followed by religious
philosophy. Therefore, Tibetology has a philological tradition, and many Tibetologists are
more interested in textual rather than field study. After 1951 China gained the actual
administrative control of Tibet; it became a kind of “forbidden area”, as it was closed to
foreigners until the 1980s. After 1980, although Tibet has become “open” for foreigners,
restrictions still hinder field study in Tibet: they cannot freely go everywhere in Tibet, and
researchers and journalists are usually accompanied by officers of the government. The first
foreign researcher entered Tibet after 1980 was American scholar Melvyn Goldstein, who
went to Lhasa to collect linguistic data while compiling a dictionary in 1985. In addition,
Chinese and Tibetan scholars cannot speak freely about their research areas. The result of this
situation is that anthropological studies in Tibet are much less developed than other studies in
Tibetology. However, some scholars have conducted anthropological research about other
people who practice Tibetan Buddhism and about Tibetan exiles in other countries; for
example, Sherry Ortner studied Sherpas in Nepal, and Geoffrey Samuel studied Tibetans in
India and Nepal.
31
In terms of Tibetan circumambulation, after reviewing the English and Chinese literature, and
literature translated into English and Chinese, I found that the first work to focus on Tibetan
circumambulation itself is a chapter in Robert B. Ekvall’s book Religious Observances in
Tibet: Patterns and Function published in 1964. Ekvall was a seasoned military Professional
Expert Interpreter of the US Army during World War II in the Pacific. He was in close
contact and carefully communicated with Tibetans, especially in Amdo, during his more than
eight-year mission in Asia. Based on his personal observations in Tibet and interviews with
Tibetans including some high-ranking lamas back in the US, he wrote this book. In one
chapter, Ekvall gives a detailed ethnographic description of circumambulation, including its
origin, terminology, function, manner, and types. Although that chapter was written 50 years
ago, we can compare what circumambulation was like before 1959, when China took over
Tibet, to modern society. By reading his study, I found how Tibetans have kept the tradition
and also how circumambulation has changed since that time.
In one chapter, Ekvall states that most references in his time only mentioned
circumambulation briefly and dropped it; no one realized its importance in Tibetan culture
(Ekvall 1964: 235). Although there are more descriptions of circumambulation nowadays,
these still only consist of scattered descriptions instead of explorations of a particular interest
in the subject, as far as I know. One exception is an article written by Charlene E. Makely
that later became one chapter of her book (Makely 2007). Original and distinct in Makely’s
work is that she views circumambulation from a feminist perspective; she argues that there
are gendered boundaries in motion expressed by circumambulation in Tibet. Tibetan village
women are usually busy doing household chores while men gather to relax. However, women
still outnumber men doing circumambulation. For women, circumambulation is “the most
important avenue for empowered action aimed at self-improvement in a rapidly changing
32
world with few opportunities for women’s social mobility and education” (Makely 2007:
174).
Although most academic literature which mentions circumambulation in Tibet is under the
perspective of pilgrimage, pilgrimage itself is a relatively new topic in Tibetology, and much
stimulus has been provided by the works of Victor Turner and his theoretical successors.
Since the 1960s and 1970s, when some Indic scholars contributed pioneering work in
Himalayan and Tibetan studies, pilgrimage has increasingly come into Tibetologists’ view
(McKay 1998: 3-4). Representative Western scholars in this research area are Alex McKay
and Toni Huber. Alex McKay graduated from the School of Oriental and African Studies at
the University of London; his main research area is the pilgrimage to Mount Kailash. As an
editor and conference organizer, he made significant contributions to the modern study of
pilgrimage in Tibet. He realized that textual study alone is no longer enough to understand
pilgrimage in Tibet and Tibetan culture, and so his compilation Pilgrimage in Tibet (McKay
1998) gives a collection of essays written by scholars from different disciplines including
anthropology, sociology, religious studies, and so on. Toni Huber is another scholar who
researches pilgrimage and sacred geography in Tibet at Humboldt University in Berlin. In his
compilation Sacred Spaces and Powerful Places in Tibetan Culture (Huber 1999), all essays
attempt to document and interpret how Tibetan people define sacredness and their
relationship with it. In addition, Samten Gyeltsen Karmay is worth mentioning as a scholar in
this research field. Unlike Western Tibetologists, he is a Tibetan and received both complete
Tibetan religious training and Western academic training. After obtaining the degree of geshe
(geshé) in Tibet, the highest academic degree in Tibetan Buddhism and Bon, he went to the
School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London to study western
Tibetology, obtaining a PhD degree there. With the double-degree and double-identity,
33
Karmay gives an extraordinary interpretation on worship to mountain gods and pilgrimage in
Tibet from both emic and etic perspectives in his two-volume collection of essays The Arrow
and the Spindle: Studies in History, Myths, Rituals and Beliefs in Tibet (Karmay 1998, 2005).
For the essays in these three books, a Tibetan scholar in China, Caibei, has already done a
summary review. In her essay The Study and Analysis of Sacred Geography in Tibet under
the Western Perspective of Pilgrimage (Caibei 2010), she analyzed the thirty-one essays
focusing on pilgrimage by topic, method, and places of fieldwork. She found that these
essays are mainly based on studies of texts and iconography and summarized four features:
first, pilgrimage is the main perspective by which Western scholars study sacred geography
and landscape, especially in folk religion. It expresses their background of anthropological
theories, especially a rethinking of Victor Tuner’s theories in the context of pilgrimages in
Tibet; second, Western scholars prefer profound case studies rather than general discussions
of big topics; third, almost every essay focuses on Tibetan literature or texts. It reflects the
emic perspective of anthropology to understand pilgrimage in Tibetan cultural contexts;
fourth, studies of pilgrimages aim to offer new perspectives, such as seeking the reason for
pilgrimage from personal experience, tracing cultural changes by landscape, or promoting
classic Tibetan studies (Caibei 2010: 117).
During the time when Tibet was closed to foreigners, Chinese scholars wrote many works
about Tibet. Although some of them are usually ignored by western academics because of
their relatively low quality and obvious political bent, there are still some worthy
ethnographic studies. As my mother tongue is Chinese, I have used more Chinese references
in this thesis to support my study than other Western works, some of which have never been
mentioned in English before. Although in Chinese literature, most references to
34
circumambulation are in itineraries and general introductions, there are still some academic
works focused on this field. The most important one is a doctoral dissertation, The Sacred
Circumambulation in Lhasa: a Study of the Sacred Space and Time Living, written by Hu
Sheng Zhang (Zhang 2006). Zhang is a Han Chinese who has lived in Lhasa for more than
twenty years, and is currently a professor at Tibet University. In his dissertation, he gives a
specific account of the circumambulations made by laymen, particularly in Lhasa, including
the circumambulation paths, religious practices while circumambulating, and personal
religious experiences of circumambulation. Through his fieldwork in Lhasa, he interprets
circumambulation as a daily religious practice made by common people under the
institutional system of Tibetan Buddhism and reflective of Tibetan people’s knowledge
structure; Tibetan people establish a unique relationship between space and time through
circumambulation, and in this relationship, human, time, and space are unified organically;
and circumambulation is a spontaneous religious practice that represents the consistency of
individuals and groups (Zhang 2006: 172-174). Zhang’s research gives a detailed
ethnography from the perspectives of folklore study and ordinary Tibetans. It is the first
monograph in this field in China; however, it still leaves blanks, being the study of
circumambulation is in a single sacred city. In this aspect, the Western researchers provide a
broader view of circumambulation under the perspective of pilgrimage.
In addition, another Chinese scholar, Jing Hua Zhang, first paid close attention to the circular
phenomena in Tibetan Buddhism. In his article (Zhang 1989), he notices the universality of
the circle in Tibetan culture and summarizes the circles of street, architecture, stupa, religious
instrument, natural landscape, dance, and mantra. His conclusion, however, simply links the
circle with samsara. He concludes that as a consequence of this emphasis on circularity, Tibet
was backward before China took over Tibet and promoted modernization. He argued, for
35
example, that “actually, circular movement is a cycle without advance, its social function is
stagnation; that is the spiritual reason that Tibet was behind modern society before
Democratic Reform in 1959” (Zhang 1989: 74, translated by author). I understand that
Chinese scholars had to do this, 1989 was a special year when both Tibet and Beijing had
political turmoil. Zhang was still the first one to focus on circular symbolism in Tibet and to
publish on this topic in China.
Unlike previous studies, which emphasize Tibetan textual study and particular case studies
from the perspective of pilgrimage, and which consider circumambulation to be an aspect of
pilgrimage ritual, my analysis focuses on circumambulation itself. Here, I consider
pilgrimage to be a long-distance and large-scale circumambulation and establish a model of
circumambulation in Tibet based on different scales. Based on my literature review,
participant observation, and personal circumambulation in Lhasa, Mount Kailash and Lake
Manasarovar, I attempt to interpret how Tibetans indicate their culture and philosophy by
circumambulation in a broad sense.
For each category of circumambulation, I chose one representative case and did fieldwork in
summer 2012. It was a turbulent year in Tibet with media reports of many self-immolations
and other turmoil, and the atmosphere there was tense. I do not speak Tibetan and did not
have the opportunity to meet many Tibetan people. Because I stayed there a short time, I only
made casual conversation with some pilgrims and did not conduct in-depth interviews.
Anthropologists and journalists were not welcome at this time; to protect my informants and
myself, I did not record any conversations, instead writing them afterwards from my memory.
36
Chapter II. Circumambulation of Natural Landscape
Mountains: Mount Kailash
Traditional livelihood in Tibet is based on herding and agriculture, and intensive agriculture
is not practiced because of the harsh climate and low population. People mainly rely on
natural conditions and the magic, which can change those conditions, rather than on
agricultural technology. With this compact and intense relationship between human and
environment, plus the geographic fact that the Tibetan Plateau abounds with mountains and
lakes, it is easy to see how the worship of mountains, lakes, and animals formed, expressing
this relation religiously.
The Tibetan people consider the deities of mountains as gzhi bdag (zhi dak) the ‘owner of
base’, or yul lha (yül la), the ‘territorial god’. These deities are related closely to the regions
they are located in and are believed to give particular power to the local chief (Karmay 1998:
432). Before the introduction of Buddhism, the cult of the mountain belonged to laymen;
after the arrival of Buddhism, some of the mountains became gnas ri (né ri), the ‘mountain
where holy people lived’, especially the holy Buddhists by the process of Buddhicisation and
the ritual of circumambulation materializing and consolidating this transformation
(Buffetrille 1998: 20-23). Now, not only do local people venerate these mountains, but so do
pilgrims from other parts of Tibet. These mountains are also believed to be repositories for
the hidden treasures of previous saints, and thus have become the guardians of the treasure.
Traditionally, Tibetan people worship mountain deities with the bsang (sang) ‘purification’
ritual, which is an immolated offering made by burning juniper branches, tsampa, and tea.
Besides the mountains, Tibetan people perform the bsang ritual daily to pray for happiness.
The cult of the mountain, yul lha, in which laymen make propitiation, is only concerned with
37
local and mundane affairs rather than spiritual reward. By contrast, the people who venerate
the mountains as gnas ri expect to obtain spiritual enlightenment through the ritual of
circumambulation, which does not happen in the cult of yul lha (Karmay 2005: 33-34). A
description of the cult of yul lha would be outside of the scope of the present thesis and
beyond my present ability.
Mountain has different meanings to different people; as for what is a mountain in the Tibetan
context, in his doctoral dissertation, Huber gives an answer in summary:
To the Tibetan Tantric practitioner, it is a potential relationship-partner of a certain
kind. The mountain is experienced intensely as a place with which one may enter
into a “shamanic” relationship within a context of specialized Buddhist practice […]
To many other Tibetans, it is the home or locus of powerful spirit forces, or is
consubstantial with those forces. Its gods and goddesses have to be prayed to,
bargained with or placated by offerings, and generally treated with the respect due
to higher-status beings […] Further, the mountain is a physical body or set of
bodies which can be seen in the landscape, as it is animated in various ways on
both large and small scales […] Finally, the mountain is a source of an
empowerment which is atemporal and differentially distributed in space, and which
gives the positive value to the physical relationship Tibetans can have with its
environment. (Huber 1993: 245-246)
Among the mountains designated as gnas ri which pilgrims circumambulate, I have chosen
Mount Kailash as the place to do the fieldwork and conduct circumambulation in person
because of its significant representativeness.
38
There are two famous mountains with international reputation in Tibet: one is Mount Everest,
the highest mountain on Earth; the other is Mount Kailash or Kailas, the center of the world
according to four religions. For most Han Chinese, Mount Everest is famous for its
geographic features; people go there for tourism and expeditions, especially the commercial
climbs which have become available. By contrast, not many of them know Mount Kailash
since it is far away and its significant religious value is unfamiliar to most Han Chinese.
However, it attracts many foreigners such as Western missionaries, explorers, travelers,
Indian pilgrims, and Japanese monks.
The Western world did not know Mountain Kailash and Lake Manasarovar until the 18th
century. Charles Allen’s book A Mountain in Tibet (Allen 1982) gives a summary of early
Westerners who has been in this region, from the first Westerner, Father Ippolito Desideri, an
Italian Jesuit missionary, to Swedish explorer Sven Hedin. The most famous of these early
explorers must be Sven Hedin. He completed the discovery of Tibet after his last journey
through Central Asia in 1908, filling in the last blank on the map of Tibet. He gave solid and
detailed geographical information on Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar in his threevolume Trans-Himalaya: Discoveries and Adventures in Tibet (Hedin 1909, 1909, 1913);
some of his descriptions of Tibetans still hold true after more than 100 years, and I still saw
the same thing when I was in Tibet in 2012.
As a sacred mountain for Hinduism and Jainism, Mount Kailash also attracted Indian
pilgrims before Tibet was closed to foreigners. One of them who merits mention is Swami
Pranavananda, an Indian physician and scientific officer. He first visited Mount Kailash and
Lake Manasarovar in 1928 and visited there every year after 1935. He spent 2-6 months
during every visit, mainly for his spiritual practices, and spent more than two years (1936,
39
1943) as a resident at Trugo Monastery. Prior to 1950, he had circumambulated Mount
Kailash 22 times, and 25 times around Lake Manasarovar. However, he was more notable for
his scientific works. During his leisure time, he conducted varied research of the KailashManasarovar region, his book Kailas-Manasarovar (Pranavananda 1949) is an encyclopedic
work including a general introduction to Tibetan religions and research on geography,
geology, botany, zoology, and archaeology. He revised Sven Hedin’s work on the source of
four rivers, namely the Brahmaputra, the Indus, the Sutlej and the Karnali in India. Some
knowledge of his work is still very useful today.
Japanese monks also had a strong interest in Tibet because they have and still practice the
tradition of Tantric Buddhism. Since the late 19th century, some Japanese monks have
travelled to Tibet to collect Buddhist texts. Among them, Ekai Kawaguchi entered Tibet from
Nepal in 1900 and was the first Japanese person to go to Lhasa. In his Three Years in Tibet
(Kawaguchi 1909, chap. 26-31), he recorded his journey to Mount Kailash and Lake
Manasarovar. Although some of his descriptions are not accurate and his comments about
Tibetan customs are biased, his work drew people’s attention to Tibet and inspired Tibetan
studies in Japan.
After 1980, when Tibet was opened to world, more foreign travelers could go to Mount
Kailash and Lake Manasarovar, and more travel guides and travelogues were published.
Some of these travel writings bring a wealth information about pilgrimage and offer more upto-date descriptions of Tibet. In The Sacred Mountain of Tibet (Johnson and Moran 1989),
Russell Johnson and Kerry Moran offer a highly readable account of their journey to Mount
Kailash. Although this book mostly consists of pictures, these amazing images vividly show
not only the sites and what people do during circumambulation, but also the magnificent
40
natural scenery, bringing to mind the adage, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” They
also describe the contrary attitudes of Tibetans and Westerners to Mountain Kailash: Tibetans
show extreme piety towards it; however Westerners think Tibetans are extremely
superstitious. For this, Johnson and Moran explain that:
The reality of Kailas is of a sort approached not by logic, but by faith—and this is
not blind belief, but simply a confidence in the validity of experiences beyond the
realm of facts and the senses. This is the secret of all the rituals of pilgrimage, the
prostrations and mantras and circumambulations, the piled stones and tattered
prayer flags. Their importance is not in the acts themselves, but in the attitude they
create: openness to a higher state of being, a profound reverence for the natural
perfection expressed by Kailas and Manasarovar, and a belief in the potential in
every being to touch that perfection. (Johnson and Moran 1989: 122)
John Snelling’s book The Sacred Mountain (Snelling 1990) is another good travel guide to
Mount Kailash. Although he never went to Mount Kailash due to illness, he gives different
routes there and discusses its religious significance in Hinduism, Jainism, Tibetan Buddhism,
and Bon. Besides that, he extends Charles Allen’s work on travelers who have visited Mount
Kailash and provides information from recent travelers including Bradley Rowe, Victor Chan,
William Forbes, Sue Burns and Reinhold Messner.
Colin Thubron, the famous British travel writer, also has a travelogue of his journey to Mount
Kailash, To a Mountain in Tibet (Thubron 2011). Unlike pilgrims, he writes his experience
from the perspective of a layman. He went to Mount Kailash on account of the death of his
family and wanted to leave a sign of their passage. In this book, he describes the natural
41
scenery with his beautiful writing and discussion of Tibetan Buddhism and Hinduism.
Chapters 13 and 14 provide his observations of circumambulation of Mount Kailash, in
which he observed the importance of the circle and walking in Tibetan culture:
Whether in the ritual of pilgrimage, the cycles of reincarnation or the revolution of
the Buddhist Wheel, the circle is here the shape of the sacred. In folklore, gods,
demons and even reptiles perform kora. By this dignity of walking, pilgrims
acquire future merit and earthly happiness, and sometimes whole families pour
round Kailas with their herd and dogs—all sentient creatures will accrue merit—
after travelling here for hundreds of miles. (Thubron 2011: 156)
Mount Kailash is located near Darchen town, Baga township, Pulan County, Ngari. It is not
an easy place to get to, even when you have already been in Tibet. Following the paved road
from Lhasa to Shiquanhe, the capital town of Ngari, a route also known as the South Line, it
usually takes 20 hours to get to Mount Kailash from Lhasa by car. If going there on the North
Line, it takes much longer, and the way is often blocked because of poor weather and road
conditions. I chose the South Line to get to Mount Kailash in 2012; my destination was a
town named Darchen, which is near the mountain, though you cannot find it on maps
published in China. Darchen is a small town reliant on the pilgrimage to Mount Kailash; most
restaurants and hostels are run by Han Chinese from Sichuan Province, and the businesses
here are obviously seasonal—open in summer and closed in winter. Mostly Tibetans,
meanwhile, run the businesses on the circumambulation path itself, working as porters and
horsemen, and offering lodging. Some also run shops selling religious objects in town.
42
In Tibetan, Mount Kailash is known as gangs ti se (gang ti sé) ‘brisk mountain’ or gangs
rinpoche (gang rinpoché) ‘precious treasure of mountain’ (Tsering 1996: 67). It is
recognizable by its pyramid-shaped main peak (see Figure 1). Although it stands only 6,714
m, short in comparison to other peaks in the Himalayas, it has not yet been climbed (Snelling
1990: 120). It is the source of four rivers: rta mchog gtsang po (ta chok tsang po) ‘Horse
Fountain River’, headwater of the Yarlung River (the Brahmaputra River in India); seng ge
gtsang po (seng gé tsang po) ‘Lion Fountain River’, the main headwater of the Indus River;
glang chen gtsang po (lang chen tsang po) ‘Elephant Fountain River’, headwater of the Sutlej
River (a main tributary of the Indus River); and ma ja gtsang po (ma ja tsang po) ‘Peacock
River’, headwater of the Karnali River (a main tributary of the Ganges). These four animals
are considered as mounts of Dhyani Buddhas, who are incarnations of Buddha’s good
qualities in Vajrayana Buddhism; thus these rivers symbolize parts of the mandala of the
universe, of which Mount Kailash is the center (Lama Anagarika Govinda 2006: 274).
Coincidentally, Mount Kailash is also the holy mountain of four religions—Bon, Buddhism,
Hinduism and Jainism—as the axis mundi, that is the world axis or center of the world. This
is a very common concept in many religions and mythologies, according to Mircea Eliade:
“Every microcosm, every inhabited region, has what may be called a ‘Centre’; that is to say,
a place that is sacred above all” (Eliade 1991: 39).
43
Figure 1. Mount Kailash. Photo by the author, 2012.
The worship of Mount Kailash can be traced back to primitive Bon, coming before Shenrab
Miwoche. According to the cosmology of Bon, the universe is divided into three layers. The
upper layer is lha (la) for the deities; the middle layer is gnyan (nyen) for the humans; the
lower layer is klu (lu) for aquatic creatures that live in the underworld (Tsering 1996: 67).
The Mount Kailash is in the middle of gnyan and its crystal peak is like a cross-shaped dorje
(dojé) ‘thunderbolt’ which can reach the upper layer and lower layers. Primitive deities are
connected with Mount Kailash; for example, gu byi mang ske (gu ji mang ké) arrived at
Mount Kailash in the incarnation of a white yak as the protector of Bon (Tsering 1996: 68). It
is believed that there is a ladder of sky known as dmu thag (mu tak) or gnam thag (nam tak)
at the peak of Mount Kailsh (Xie 1988: 91) which attracted adherents to conduct pilgrimages
from the neighboring areas of Zhang Zhuang. After Bon was founded by Shenrab Miwoche,
Mount Kailash became a place for ascetic practice. It is said that Shenrab Miwoche taught
esoteric teachings to the Bon practitioners of Zhang Zhuang when he passed by Mount Kaish
to chase his foe. Currently, there are relics of 37 vdu gnas (vadu né) ‘gathering places’, 27
44
gnas mchog (né chok) ‘sacred places’ and eight sky burial platforms at Mount Kailash
(Tsering 1996: 69).
After the introduction of Buddhism, Bon lost its dominance. In order to survive, it absorbed
many concepts and dharma from Buddhism and changed its outer forms. To create a world
like the Land of Bliss in Buddhism, it used the birthplace of Shenrab Miwoche and the
landscape of Mount Kailash as a foundation and created the Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring with a
new meaning ‘Under the eternal mercy of Shenrob Miwoche, there is no pain of samsara and
one can gain eternal happiness’. In this world, Mount Meru in Buddhism is replaced by the
nine-layer Yung Drung Mountain based on Mount Kailash. The adherents of Bon believe
they can obtain power, cleanse sin, and be born in the layer of lha in next life by
circumambulation of the sacred mountain (Tsering 1996:70-71).
In Buddhist cosmology, vertically the world consists of the Formless Realm, the Form Realm,
and the Desire Realm; horizontally the world consists of the great sea, four continents, eight
subcontinents, the Sun, the Moon, seven rings of Gold Mountain, and the Ring of Iron
Mountain. In the middle of this world is Mount Meru. One thousand such small worlds
constitute a middle world and one thousand such middle worlds constitute a large world; this
is known as a trichiliocosm. Each trichiliocosm is mastered by a buddha. Since there are
infinite buddhas, there are infinite trichiliocosms (Dirhagama Vol. 20).
45
Figure 2. Buddhist Cosmology. Source: Abhidharma.
In terms of the location of Mount Meru, there are some disputes. However, Mount Kailsh has
gradually become linked with Mount Meru. According to the pilgrimage guide Tise lo rgyus
(tisé lo gyü) written by a hierarch of one tributary lineage of Kagyupa in 1896, it is said that:
After the earlier world was destroyed by fire, water and wind, there were 21 Kalpas
of emptiness. Then appeared according to Karma of the beings a white light of
ether called “completely pure thought” which alone was able to support the three
thousand-fold cosmic sphere. Then fire which was aroused by red and yellow wind
put the air into motion which was of sapphire colour and round in form. Over the
wind circles of water assembled as golden rain clouds. On top of it formed a golden
land of square shape with mountain ranges, oceans and continents. In the centre
was Mount Meru, surrounded by golden and iron mountains. It is said this is also
46
Mount Tise, the head which unites four rivers, in the navel of Jambudvipa.
(Loseries-Leick 1998: 153)
In Tibetan Buddhism, Mount Kailash is considered the mandala of Cakrasamvara, one of the
five most important deities in Vajrayana practice. Kagyupa is connected closely with Mount
Kailash. It is said that Milarepa went to Mount Kailash to do ascetic practice at his master
Marpa’s request and met a Bon practitioner, Na Ro Bon Chuang. Na Ro Bon Chuang asserted
that Mount Kailash is the sacred mountain of Bon and asked Milarepa to leave unless he
converted to Bon. Similarly, Milarepa asserted it is sacred mountain of Buddhism and asked
Na Ro Bon Chuang to leave unless he converted to Buddhism. As a result, they used a magic
contest to decide who could practice there. After a series of fights, Milarepa had an advantage
over Na Ro Bon Chuang, so Na Ro Bon Chuang suggested a final competition of climbing to
the top of Mount Kailash. While Na Ro Bon Chuang flew on his magic drum to the peak,
Milarepa beamed himself to the peak immediately in a white light. Consequently, Na Ro Bon
Chuang failed and Mount Kailash has become the Buddhist sacred mountain and place for
retreat since then (Tsering 1996: 75).
In Hinduism, besides its connection with Mount Meru, Mount Kailash is also associated with
Shiva. According to the mythological Churning of the Ocean of Milk in the Puranas, devas
‘deities’ and asuras ‘demons’ churned the Ocean of Milk to find the nectar of immortality.
During the churning, they found a lethal poison which could contaminate the milk ocean and
destroy all creation. Vishnu suggested they ask Shiva for help, and Shiva inhaled the poison
and saved the world. However, the poison was so powerful that Shiva felt very hot and
wanted to find a cool place to release the pain; he chose Mount Kailash as his residence.
47
Since his throat was burned by the poison, Shiva is also known as the blue-throated one
(Huang 1986: 62-65).
Jainism was established before Buddhism, and its many concepts like samsara, reason, and
result influenced Buddhism. To Jainists, Mount Kailash is considered as Astapada, the place
where the first Tirthankara Risabha, the founder of Jainism, attained liberation. Tirthakara is
the title for the head of Jainism and means ‘the one who has cut through the ocean of samsara
towards liberation’ (Loseries-Leick 1998: 149). Because of this, Mount Kailash has become
the sacred mountain for Jainists, and they believe a pilgrimage there can bring the highest
transcendental rewards (Tsering 1996: 74).
Historically, as these four religions interacted with each other, Mount Kailash has become a
pilgrimage center in the Himalayan region. “To see the greatness of a mountain, one must
keep one’s distance; to understand its form, one must move around it” (Lama Anagarika
Govinda 2006: 272). Every year, pilgrims from Tibet, India, and Nepal go to circumambulate
it, especially in the Year of the Horse, which is considered the most auspicious time by
Tibetan Buddhists; in this year, one circumambulation is equivalent to 13 circles in ordinary
years. According to the same pilgrimage guide, circumambulation at different times gains
different benefits:
If you circumambulate one circuit around the great palace of Ti-se, the obscurations
of one life will be purified. Accordingly, if you circumambulate it ten times, the
obscurations of a cosmic age will be purified. If you do one hundred
circumambulations, after perfecting the ten marks and eight qualities, you will
attain Buddhahood in one lifetime. (Huber and Rigzin 1999: 139)
48
Traditionally, there are three circumambulatory paths of Mount Kailash for particular kinds
of living beings: the longest, phyi skor (chi kor) ‘the outer one’, for ordinary human beings;
bar skor (bar kor) ‘the intermediate one’ for the daka and the dakini9, the embodiment of
enlightenment energy; and nang skor (nang kor) ‘the inner one’, for the five hundred arhats10
(Buffetrille 1998: 26). Nowadays, following oral tradition, people who have finished 13
circumambulations on the outer path can circumambulate the inner one. There is a legend in
the same pilgrimage guide:
It is said that in the past, at the small lake which is at the top of the sGrol-ma La
pass, a woman pilgrim from Khams who was carrying a small child on her back,
bent over to take a drink of water. Because she did this the child slipped into the
water and died. Ever since that time, the surface of the lake has been closed over
[by ice]. The Khams-pa woman began to accumulate circumambulations to atone
for the killing of the child. Thus, when she had made 13 circuits she produced
imprints of her hands and feet on a stone as a mark of the purification of her
obscurations, and she passed on to the Abode of Celestial Action (Khecara) in the
rainbow-body state. (Huber and Rigzin 1999: 139)
I arrived in Darchen, the town near the foot of Mount Kailash, at noon after a 24-hour nonstop bus ride. The bus only stopped by the side of the road, and I needed to walk into town
from there. At the road into town there is a ticket box set up by local people to sell entry
permits (200 RMB, about 35 CAD) to tourists. Since it meant a lot to me, and one Tibetan
told me on the bus that I could take a detour to escape it, I walked across the grass to the town
instead of the paved road, and the result was it took me an hour to get into town over a
Daka and Dakini, literally meaning sky walker are male and female practitioners of Tantric Buddhism, who are
believed as incarnation of some buddhas and bodhisattvas.
10 People who have attained nirvana.
9
49
distance it would take five minutes to drive. I also had my first experience of hypoxia;
although I had been in Lhasa for several days, Darchen is about 1000 m higher than Lhasa,
and with a 50-pound backpack, I had to take a rest every five minutes.
Darchen is a very little town that has developed because of the pilgrimage. It only had 20
households in the 1990s; as more and more tourists and pilgrims came here, local people
started to built hostels and restaurants for them. Presently, there are more than 100
households there, and some local villagers are still nomads, so they rent out their houses to
businessmen from the Chinese interior when they are out of town herding. The infrastructure
of the town is not very well developed; there is still no electrical grid here, and hostels run
their own generators from 9:00 PM to 12:00 PM every day. The hostels do not have water for
showers, but there is one public bathhouse in the town.
It was too late for me to circumambulate that first day, so I planned to start the next morning
and found a hostel to stay at. The owners of the hostel were Han Chinese from Sichuan; they
told me the hostel is only open from March to October, and for the rest of year they go home.
The main customers are tourists and pilgrims; two groups of Indian pilgrims had already
stayed there before I arrived. I went to a halal noodle shop for dinner; the owner was a
Muslim from Qinghai, and he told me he would move home next year because business was
not good. After I tasted his noodles, I thought I knew the reason. Due to low atmospheric
pressure in high altitude areas, the boiling point of water is about 80˚C, which makes it
impossible to properly cook rice and noodles. Perhaps this explains why tsampa is the main
food in Tibet.
50
Map 3. The circumambulatory path of Mount Kailash. Source: Johnson and Moran 1989: 125.
The distance of the whole outer circumambulation path is approximately 54 km. Tibetans
usually take one day to finish it, whereas I planned for two days. I woke up at 6:00 AM the
next day and started to circumambulate after breakfast. By the time I started my
circumambulation, some Tibetans had already set out on their way. They walked while
rotating prayer wheels, and I could hear the murmur of “om mani padme hum” (om ma ni
padmé hum) as they passed me by. It is the mantra of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva, meaning
‘adoration to the Jewel in the Lotus, amen’. This is the most common symbol in Tibet and is
almost everywhere: walls, stones, paper, the people’s mouths, and so on. Such things usually
51
took on the word “mani” (mani), such as mani stones (see Figure 3). Sven Hedin has a vivid
description about this:
The mystic words rang constantly in my ears. I heard them when the sun rose and
when I blew out my light, and I did not escape them even in the wilderness, for my
own men murmured “Om mani padme hum”. They belong to Tibet, these word;
they are inseparable from it: I cannot imagine the snow-capped mountains and the
blue lakes without them. They are as closely connected with this country as buzzing
with the bee-hive, as the flutter of streamers with the pass, as the ceaseless west
wind with its howling. (Hedin 1909: 206)
Figure 3. Mani stone. Photo by the author, 2012.
I could not follow them because they walked so fast, but after a while I met a group of
Western pilgrims at the first of four devotional spots where pilgrims prostrate themselves to
the summit of Mount Kailash. They piously prostrated to the mountain and prayed, which
52
attracted my attention. I waited for them to finish and tried to talk to the last one in their
queue; he was an American Indian and Hindu who teaches people with disabilities in Chicago.
He told me that foreigners cannot come on pilgrimage by themselves; rather, they must be
part of a local tourist group with a guide. I asked him what he prayed for just now; he said it
was for better life and his disabled students. From his outfit and behavior, I guessed he was
part of the middle class in the United States; obviously he was not there for fun, but was a
serious pilgrim.
There is a big pole called darchen (darchen) in Tibetan from which hangs the wind-horse
flags (see Figure 4); it is also named Tarboche in the English literature. People believe that
when the wind blows the wind-horse flags, it reads the mantra on them and spreads the merit
to the places where the wind goes. This has not change from the old picture I saw in the book
Pilgrimage in Tibet. There is also a big one in the town of Darchen town that is raised every
April in the Tibetan calendar to commemorate the Buddha’s birth. This is probably the source
of the town’s name.
53
Figure 4. Wind-horse flag. Photo by the author, 2012.
Then I took a rest in a store under the Chukku Monastery or chukku gompa (chuku gompa) in
Tibetan, which is the first of three monasteries on the outer path Chukku Monastery, Dirapuk
Monastery and Zutulpuk Monastery; all belong to Kagyupa to commemorate its victory in the
conflict against Bon at Mount Kailash. In the store, I met an old German couple with their
Tibetan guide. They came here to trek, but after a rest I saw them rent horses to ride, and the
Tibetan guide told me they had hypoxia and really wanted to finish the circumambulation. I
asked him if riding a horse would nullify the merit of circumambulation; he smiled and said:
“It still can gain merit, but not as much as walking. Whatever, they are foreigners and not
pilgrims.” I continued my walk after they left and I did not meet anyone until I took a rest at
another store in a tent. Here I saw a Westerner who could speak with the store owner in
Tibetan; I tried to talk with that man and learned that he is a Tibetan Buddhist from Germany
who studied Tibetan in Nepal for one year. This was his second pilgrimage here.
54
Before I reached the day’s destination—a hostel under the north face of Mount Kailash and in
the middle of the outer circumambulatory path, I met a Tibetan woman with two little girls.
Their appearance looked the most characteristic of the Tibetan pilgrims I saw that day:
shabby clothes, dirty and tangled hair and red-black faces, but with clear eyes. The woman
could not speak Mandarin and just smiled to me; the two little girls were not shy to strangers
and expressed an interest in my camera. One of them could speak a little Mandarin and talked
to me.
Girl: What is that?
Me: Camera.
Girl: (Grabs camera and tries to figure it out by herself.)
Me: Are you three a family?
Girl: (Nodding) Mom and sister.
Me: Are you in school?
Girl: (Nodding) Grade one.
Me: Why do you do this (circumambulation)?
Girl: Mom is ill.
She figured out how to use the camera and wanted me to take a picture of her. We went to a
place where we could see the summit of Mount Kailash, and she put her palms together
naturally and smiled innocently. Then I showed her the picture; she was very happy and
showed it to her mom and sister. They smiled and invited me to drink yak butter tea. After I
finished the tea, they nodded with a smile to say goodbye and continued their
circumambulation. When I reached the hostel, the owner told me this family I had met has
circumambulated Mount Kailash almost 100 times.
55
I woke up at 7:00 AM the next morning and started to walk. This day I needed to pass the
highest point of the outer circumambulatory path, called Droma La, ‘the pass of Tara’11,
which is 5636 m. I heard that three Indian pilgrims had died there recently; however, such a
death in the presence of the gods at the most sacred place would realize their highest
aspirations (Lama Anagarika Govinda 2006: 295). There is a symbolically important site
named Shiwa Tsal before Droma La (see Figure 5); this is a place where people discard their
used articles for daily use like clothes, and they also leave a lock of hair or a few drops of
blood. It is believed that one can cleanse one’s sins and gain a rebirth by this means; it
symbolizes that the old body has died here and has been reborn as a new one. Some people
also circumambulated the big pile of clothes, I asked one man why they did this:
Me: Why do you walk around this? Does it have power?
Man: I don’t know. Why you are here? You are the first Han Chinese I saw this
time.
Me: I don’t know, I am interested in it.
Man: (Laughing) You don’t know, I don’t know, so just walk around. It’s good, the
more the better.
Most such laymen did not know the religious reason for their circumambulation or what
benefits they would gain when I asked them. They may not know the reason for
circumambulation, but they will perform it unfailingly. Like the little girl I met before, who
might not know the meaning of holding her palms together, she did it naturally. What they
expect from circumambulation is usually mundane rather than religious; although the family I
met had already done almost enough circumambulations to become a buddha in this life, their
11
Tara is one form of incarnation of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva.
56
aim was to cure a disease. This situation seems never to change, more than 100 years ago,
Sven Hedin mentioned the same situation in his book:
We soon discover that most of these simple pilgrims have no clear idea of the
benefits their journey is supposed to confer on them […] what they are all believe
most firmly and obstinately is that the pilgrimage will bring them a blessing in this
world. It will ward off all evil from their tents and huts, will keep away sickness
from their children and herds, protect them from robbers, thieves and losses, will
send them rain, good pasturage, and increase among their yaks and sheep, will act
like a talisman, and guard themselves and their property as the four spirit kings
protect the images of the temple halls from demons. (Hedin 1909: 197)
Figure 5. Shiwa Tsal. Photo by the author, 2012.
Finally, I reached Droma La. The ground was covered in wind-horse flags, and some people
were still tying new flags they had bought in Darchen on a string. They believe that the power
57
of the flags can be enhanced by taking them here during circumambulation, and that hanging
them here can gain more merit because it is the highest place on the path. Although the
summit of Mount Kailash cannot be seen here, people still prostrated themselves in the
direction of the peak (see Figure 6).
Figure 6. Tibetan woman prays at Droma La. Photo by the author, 2012.
The path gradually became easier to walk after passing Droma La, and the scene became
more colorful than the day before. I saw many marmots; Tibetans do not kill them, and
hunting is banned in the sacred mountain areas, so they were very fat and did not fear humans.
I was able to stand very close to them. This was the first time I had seen a marmot in person;
growing up in a city with few wild animals, I felt very excited. However, for Tibetans, these
marmots might have been human in their previous life, or they might be in their next life. In
addition, there are many other sacred relics and sites such as Buddha’s footprint, Dakinis’
footprints, the sacred yak’s footprint, sky burial platforms, and so on. Scientifically, these
sacred relics are just rocks with particular shapes; however, religiously, people believe that
58
they are empowered by Buddhist saints and thus can give them merit when seen, touched or
circumambulated. Some footprints have already been smoothed by touching.
More and more people passed me, and suddenly I realized there were no others but me. The
sun was setting and the sky was getting darker; I had to walk faster to make it to Darchen. At
this time, a dog joined me. Usually dogs are considered pests in Tibet; travelers bring sticks
to beat them when walking in the wild. Even the capital city Lhasa used to be teeming with
feral dogs. However, this dog was quiet and peaceful; it just followed me at a distance and
stopped when I stopped, so I gave it some food and kept walking. After while, I reached
Zutrulphuk Monastery, where I met a lama. He saw that dog was following me and said that
it used to be a human in its last life, but was reborn as a dog because of bad karma, and so it
followed pilgrims and circumambulated thus to be reborn as human again in its next life.
Ekvall also mentions animals can gain merit from circumambulation, and it is the only
religious observance in which Tibetans can bring their valued livestock as direct participants
(Ekvall 1964: 235).
Just before I got back to Darchen, I saw the only other Han Chinese during my
circumambulation. He was obviously not a pilgrim, or even a serious tourist, as he
circumambulated counter-clockwise12 (I am sure he was not a practitioner of Bon) and
because of his appearance: wearing large headphones and walking bare-chested with his shirt
unbuttoned. In his journal, Serbian professor and traveler Rakocevic mentions that one should
not use modern audio devices during circumambulation (Rakocevic 2013: 108). When I
passed him, he stopped and asked about the way.
Although only Buddhists are required to walk clockwise, tourists are usually asked to follow this custom when
travelling in Tibet to avoid embarrassment, especially in Buddhist sacred places such as Mount Kailash.
12
59
Man: This is the path to walk around the mountain, right?
Me: Yes, but you are doing it the wrong way. You should walk clockwise.
Man: Whatever, any difference?
Me: …It’s too late, you cannot finish it today.
Man: Whatever, I just came to look around.
Me: All right, take care.
Many Han Chinese tourists do know Tibet very well before coming here. Although they say
it is a spiritual journey, most of them are just interested in the natural scenery. This ignorance
intensifies the conflict between Tibetans and Han Chinese.
By 9:00 PM, I finally returned to the hostel I had stayed at previously. I was exhausted and
my feet hurt. It is said that one circuit of circumambulation can wash away the sins of one
lifetime; my body seemed to feel lighter and I felt asleep as soon as my head hit the pillow.
Lakes: Lake Manasarovar
In the Tibetan conception of space, a mountain is usually associated with a lake. In this case,
the mountain is regarded as the father, or male, and the lake is regarded as the mother, or
female (Buffetrille 1998: 18). It reflects the “divine dyad” named by John Bellezza (Bellezza
1997: 1-19), just like the yin and yang in Chinese philosophy. The caves in the sacred
mountain used for retreat by saints are also part of this sacred unity between mountain and
lake. However, such caves are not discussed further in this thesis, as they cannot be
60
circumambulated13. In the case of Mount Kailash, the associated lake is Lake Manasarovar
which is located about 25 km to the mountain’s southeast.
Figure 7. Lake Manasarovar. Photo by the author, 2012.
Manasarovar is a Sanskrit word meaning ‘Lake of Mind’; it is considered to be the lake
created by Brahma in his mind (Allen 2001: 10). Brahma also created a sacred Jambu tree,
which is invisible to humans, in the center of the lake; it is said that its fruit can turn the water
of Lake Manasarovar into the nectar of immortality14 (Lama Anagarika Govinda 2006: 277).
It is also the place where Shiva’s wife Uma bathes (Gele 2004: 63). In Hinduism, water has
sacred and ritually purifying abilities and is connected with sacred sites. In the Rg Veda, the
oldest Vedic text, the term tirtha is used to describe a river ford, or a place associated with
water. Therefore, the Hindu term for pilgrimage is tirthayatra literally meaning ‘a journey to
a place of water’ (McKay 1998: 166). Bathing is a vivid example of Hindu people’s favor for
However, people can circumambulate in the cave around some sacred objects.
It is similar to the myth Churning of the Ocean of Milk because they both mention the nectar of immortality, but I do
not have evidence to prove Ocean of Milk is Lake Manasarovar.
13
14
61
water: although the water of the Ganges is dirty in outsiders’ eyes, people still bathe in it.
Another reason that Lake Manasarovar attracts pilgrims from India is probably because some
of Mahatma Gandhi’s ashes were scattered in it.
In Tibetan, Lake Manasarovar is known as mapam yumco (mapam yumco), meaning
‘undefeatable jade lake’, which commemorates the victory of Buddhism. According to the
pilgrimage guide Tise lo rgyus, at the time when the present cosmic age had just begun, a
wheel-turning king wanted to alleviate the sufferings of old age, illness, and death. Following
the advice of his court-priest, he practiced giving without expecting reward, so he built a
charity house to collect for all the peoples of the world. He also excavated a huge pit in which
to boil water for rice. In 12 years, this pit became full and turned into a lake, namely, the
mapam yumco. It is said that its water is endowed with eight properties, so it is called the
undefeatable one (Huber and Rigzin 1999: 140). In another story, it is said that there is a
villainous dragon king of Bon living in the lake. Padmasambhava subdued it and converted it
to become a Buddhist protector (Gele 2004: 63). This version reflects the process of
Buddhicisation of the sacred places of Tibet.
According the oldest Buddhist tradition, Queen Maya, mother of the Buddha, dreamt that her
guardian gods took her to the Anotatta Lake, the Pali name for Lake Manasarovar, in which
she had a bath, and therefore all her human impurities were washed away. Then the future
Buddha descended from the direction of Mount Kailash, appearing like a white elephant in a
cloud, and entered her womb. It indicates that Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar have
been worshipped since early Buddhism (Lama Anagarika Govinda 2006: 276-277).
62
Although Lake Manasarovar is a sacred lake, Lake Rakshastal ‘lake of demons’ in Sanskrit or
lagngar co (la ang co) in Tibetan, is located to the west of Lake Manasarovar. It is
considered as a lake of demons because it lacks visible plants and animals around it. It is also
named Mountain Pass Skin, as its shape resembles a hide-couch made out of a human skin.
People describe it as being “In the raksasa country of Langka Pu-rang, a black lake of poison
ripples” (Huber and Rigzin 1999: 139). In Tibetan tradition, Lake Manasarovar’s shape is
like the sun and symbolizes the force of light, while Lake Rakshastal’s shape is like the moon
and symbolizes the force of darkness (Lama Anagarika Govinda 2006: 275). This dualistic
combination again reflects the divine dyad in Tibetan culture.
Lake Manasarovar and Mount Kailash are usually regarded as the Kailash-Manasrovar unity.
Since this unity is a sacred area of concern to three countries—China, India and Nepal—these
countries have initiated a collaborative program named The Kailash Sacred Landscape
Conservation and Development Initiative to protect the ecosystem and cultures in this area.
Currently, Lake Manasarovar and Mount Kailash are not only sacred pilgrimage sites, but
also a resort for trekking. Trekkers actually walk around the whole lake on their feet, unlike
some pilgrims.
Most pilgrims start their circumambulation of Lake Manasarovar from Chiu Monastery, on
the west side of the lake and closed to the paved road. The total distance of this
circumambulation is approximately 100 km; however, unlike Mount Kailash, vehicles can be
driven along the whole circumambulatory path. Thus people have the option to drive around
the lake, as done by Indian pilgrims who only stopped at the four sacred bathing places to
bathe. It reflects their focus of pilgrimage on water, rather than walking. Colin Thubron states
that most Hindus gave up circumambulating it long ago; perhaps because Lake Manasarovar
63
was created from the mind of Brahma, whose paradise is transient, they prefer to seek their
final liberation in Mount Kailash (Thubron 2011: 122).
The day after I finished the circumambulation of Mount Kailash, I took the Pulan Country
bus and went to Lake Manasarovar. I started my circumambulation from Chiu Monastery and
took three days to finish the whole walk. During these three days, I did not see any other
person walking around the lake as I did, perhaps because it was not the Year of the Goat,
which is considered an auspicious time to circumambulate lakes. Another reason might be
that Tibetans do the circumambulation in winter when all streams around the lake are frozen,
so they will be more easily to cross (Pranavananda 1950: 18-19). Indeed, I was blocked by
some rivers when I circumambulated it in summer; I had to wade across them, or otherwise I
had to take a long detour. In spite of that, it was an opportunity for me to feel the individual
experience of circumambulation. I intentionally did not use a watch or any other timekeeping
device. I walked alone and felt that the time went slower than when I walked with others; the
only sounds were the birds’ calls and the waves. Since my walking pace was not fast, it
seemed that the scene never changed, which made me think it would take forever to finish the
circuit. I have never meditated a long time in seclusion—to say nothing of ascetics in retreat
who have stayed in dark caves for three years, this might be what eternity feels like, at least
for me.
64
Map 4. The circumambulatory path of Lake Manasarovar. Source: Johnson and Moran 1989: 124.
I did not see anyone until I arrived at the tents near Hor, my destination for the first day. My
only roommate was a bicyclist who had ridden here from Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous
Region. He was a Han Chinese, and when we learned we were both from Xi’an, he talked to
me more.
Cyclist: What do you do?
Me: Student, you?
65
Cyclist: I work for China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) in Lanzhou
Company.
Me: Nice job, good pay. How do you have time to do this?
Cyclist: It’s so-so, I just quit it.
Me: Why?
Cyclist: It’s boring. It’s not what I want to do.
Me: So you rode a bicycle to Tibet?
Cyclist: Yeah, I am looking for myself. It is said that going to Tibet is the trip of the
soul, isn’t it?
Me: Yeah, have you found anything?
Cyclist: Not yet, but my body is getting stronger (laughs).
Me: That’s true. What’s your plan when you go back home?
Cyclist: I don’t know, maybe find a job in a branch company of CNPC in Xi’an.
Me: But you just quit and said it’s boring!
Cyclist: Yes, I know, but I need to make a living. Their pay is good.
Like Westerners, most Chinese people have imaginings of Tibet: on the one hand, they have
a stereotype that Tibet is poor and dirty, but on the other, they think they can cleanse their
souls there. Going to Tibet is becoming increasingly popular among the lower middle class
and has become a symbol of high taste in China. You can see many cyclists on their way to
Tibet from Sichuan, Qinghai, and Xinjing; they treat this trip as a monumental feat.
Everything titled Tibet or Tibetan becomes mysterious and has magical power.
The next morning, my roommate left and I continued my journey. There was still nobody but
myself. At Seralung Monastery, which was under construction, a Tibetan worker asked me to
66
take a picture of him. I did so and showed it to him; he was happy and wanted to give me a
ride on his motorcycle to Trugo Monastery, which was my stop for the day. He had drunk a
lot of beer and was not sober, so I declined the offer. After a while, he caught up with me and
said he would meet me at Trugo Monastery later that day. Before I arrived at Trugo
Monastery, I saw some Indian pilgrims taking a bath in the lake; a man playing golf near the
shore attracted my attention. From him I learned that they joined a tourism group in Nepal to
get here, and when they arrived here, the Tibet Bureau of Tourism was responsible for their
pilgrimage. They had their own cook and hired local Tibetan porters and horsemen to carry
their luggage. The cost of the pilgrimage to Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar was about
20000 RMB (CAD 3300) per person. We talked about the Indian pilgrims who died during
the circumambulation of Mount Kailash; he said: “Anyway, death is not a lucky thing, but
dying while on pilgrimage, that’s the fate. It’s a good thing.”
When I arrived at Trugo Monastery, I met the man who wanted to give me a ride earlier that
day. Unfortunately, he had broken his left arm and asked the lama here to heal it. He joked
with a wry smile and asked me to have a drink, too.
Man: It’s lucky you didn’t come with me, or you would be like me (shows me his
broken arm).
Me: That’s too bad.
Man: It is retribution.
Me: That’s because you were drunk before riding.
Man: I know, but why is today, I drink every day, it must because I did something
bad today.
Me: Drinking is bad, you know. It’s a sacred lake, you cannot drink here.
67
Man: Maybe.
Me: You are still drinking now.
Man: (Laughes) Just a little, it’s fine.
This conversation makes me think about how the Azande consider witchcraft, which EvansPritchard discussed in his book. If a granary collapsed because of termites and hurt the people
who were under it, the Azande know that the granary collapsed because the support was
broken by termites, and people sat under it in order to escape the heat and sunshine. However,
to explain why these two events happened at precisely the same time, they believe it was due
to witchcraft (Evans Pritchard 1976: 23). Similarly, this Tibetan man knew it was drinking
that caused him hurt, but in terms of why it happened today, he thought it was retribution.
The Trugo Monastery hostel was the best room I stayed at during the whole
circumambulation. After a good sleep here, I started my last day of the circuit. It was still
quiet, and I continue to walk alone, but I met some wild animals this day. One was a kyang
(kyang), a Tibetan wild ass. It was highly vigilant and ran away when I saw it. Another was
an eagle sitting on a utility pole, and it followed me for a while. I knew vultures are believed
to be a bad omen in Tibet; they will follow people who will die soon. However, I did not
know the omen of an eagle, but since it is a sacred animal in Tibetan Buddhism, I considered
it to be a good sign. Like my circumambulation of Mount Kailash, a dog joined me and
walked with me again until I finished the whole walk.
68
Chapter III. Circumambulation of Artificial Structure
Sacred City
A city is not simply an agglomeration of buildings and people, it is a symbol. In her classic
essay The City as a Sacred Center, Diana Eck writes, “A city is an ordered human habitation
with what we might call a ‘self-image’. A city has an idea of itself. It is energy converted into
culture” (Eck 1987:1). Sacred cities are especially symbolical. Some cities have “generated
entire civilizations and seem to condense the culture and values of those civilizations in one
place” (Eck 1987:1). Robert Redfield and Milton Singer describe such cities as
“orthogenetic”: they inherit the old cultures and develop into systematic dimensions
(Redfield and Singer 1969: 212). Most sacred cities are this kind of city and even become the
representatives of their cultures, such as Lhasa and Jerusalem. They recreate the cosmological
order and make it accessible on the human plan, thus becoming the centers of pilgrimage and
even the centers of the world in some cultures (Eck 1987:2).
By sacred city, I refer to a city that is considered holy or divine, both religiously and
spiritually. In my opinion, these can be divided into three categories: cities where saints were
born or died; cities that have sacred objects or architectures; and cities where saints showed
their supernatural powers or founded their sects and taught doctrines. Believers make
pilgrimage to the sacred cities of their religions and hold it could give them more powerful
reward. Almost every main religion has its sacred cities, such as Bodh Gaya for Buddhism,
Mecca for Islam and Jerusalem for three religions. For Tibetans and Tibetan Buddhism,
Lhasa is definitely the most sacred city.
69
Most tourists start their trips in Tibet at Lhasa, since it is the transportation center and also the
biggest city there. Unlike ancient times, they get there by different means—between walking,
bicycling, driving, train and flying, especially the Qinghai-Tibet Railway makes more and
more people afford to go to Tibet. Pilgrims usually go to Lhasa by car or by hitchhiking,
depending on their different economic means. Extremely pious believers and people who
have made big oaths even go to Lhasa by full body prostration.
In Tibetan, lhasa (la sa) literally means ‘place of the gods’; it has been the capital city of
Tibet since the 7th century AD when Songtsan Gampo succeed the throne of Tibetan Empire
(Blondeau, Gyatso 2003: 15). As the political, cultural, and economic center of Tibet through
history, Lhasa abounds with historical and religious sites: Potala Palace, Jokhang Monastery,
Ramoche Temple, etc. Tibetans consider going to Lhasa to be one of their most meritorious
acts in life. It allows one to get a good position in samsara, the circle of death and rebirth. For
people who live in remote herding areas like Amdo and Ngari, where it is expensive and
difficult to go to Ü-Tsang, a pilgrimage to Lhasa is their ultimate desire. Some pilgrims from
these areas stay in Lhasa and make a living by begging after their pilgrimage until they have
made enough money to return home; otherwise they start a new life in Lhasa. There used to
be a particular area south of the Potala Palace for pilgrims from outside Lhasa to live, but it is
banned for political reasons.
Lhasa used to be a forbidden city for foreigners and was hardly accessible (Filippis 2003: 114). Even after the building of the Qinghai-Tibet railway, it is still not convenient to access
due to expensive transportation fees and limited capacity. Despite these limitations, Tibet has
become a tourist resort in comparison to the past. A large number of tourists, most of them
Han Chinese, gather in Lhasa from June to September, generally the best time of year to visit
70
Tibet. The amount of Han Chinese visitors, however, varies drastically by time of year. In
winter, Tibetans from other places come to Jokhang Monastery, when possible, to pray for
the Tibetan New Year. Besides pilgrims and tourists, there is another category of people in
Lhasa—zang piao which literally means ‘people who flow in Tibet’. Most of them are Han
Chinese who are attracted by Tibetan culture and have abandoned their previous life to go to
live in Lhasa. Some of them settled down and raised families; however, some of them will go
back home eventually, when the fever is gone.
It is a most common scene in Lhasa for people to walk down the street while rotating a prayer
wheel in their hands. Actually, they are circumambulating around sacred centers. In April of
the Tibetan Calendar, circumambulation is the main activity in Lhasa, because the 15th day
of this month is Buddha’s birthday, also known as Saga Dawa (saga dawa) in Tibetan.
During the circumambulation, pilgrims will also spin prayer wheels, practice the bsang ritual
at the bsang furnaces, hang wind-horse flags on trees, and pray in monasteries on the paths.
Eck states that “sacred centers are deliberately built, and the self-conscious energy and
symbolization of the culture is brought to bear upon their layout, their architecture, and their
iconography” (Eck 1987: 4). From a sacred perspective, Lhasa has two main sacred centers:
the Potala Palace and the Jokhang Monastery. The word potala in Sanskrit means ‘brilliance’;
it derives from Mount Potalaka, which is the residence of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva, known
as Guanyin in Chinese (Stein 1972: 84). The Potala Palace was not built at one time; in the
7th century, Songtsan Gampo started to build its precursor when he moved the capital to
Lhasa and named it the Potala Palace because his yidam (yidam) ‘deity of meditation’ was
Avalokiteśvara (Shakabpa 2010: 48, 110). The Dalai Lama, the latter master of the Potala
Palace, is also considered the incarnation of Avalokiteśvara. Following the move of the
71
administrative center to Sakya after the collapse of the Tibetan Empire, the Potala Palace
became dilapidated until the time of the fifth Dalai Lama. In the 17th century, the Gelukpa
became dominant in Tibet, and Lhasa became the political center again. The fifth Dalai Lama
rebuilt the Potala Palace, also known as the White Palace. After his death, it was expanded
again in order to place his stupa; this expansion is also known as the Red Palace. In 1693,
construction of the Potala Palace was complete (Stein 1972: 84). Since then, it has been not
only the administrative center of Tibet, but also the summer residence of the Dalai Lama until
1959, when the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet. Currently, the Potala Palace is not a purely
religious place. Instead, it is a tourist attraction and World Heritage Site.
The Jokhang Monastery was also built by Songtsan Gampo. Firstly, it was used to store the
Jowo Mikyo Dorje, the life-sized statue of the eight-year-old Buddha, brought by his
Nepalese wife, Princess Bhrikuti. That statue was replaced by Jowo Sakyamuni or Jowo
Rinpoche, a statue of Buddha at age twelve, brought by his Chinese wife, Princess Wen
Cheng (Zhang 2006: 69; Shakabpa 2010: 119-120). In Tibet, people regard Jowo Rinpoche as
the material incarnation of Buddha himself, and hence the Jokhang Monastery became the
most sacred place in Tibet. It does not belong to any sect of Tibetan Buddhism; however,
most current lamas there are Gelukpa and the ceremony of enthroning the new Dalai Lama is
held in the Jokhang Monastery.
There are six circumambulation paths in Lhasa; by walking them I have found that the
spiritual and mundane life of residents in Lhasa concentrates on these two sacred centers, and
the six paths are formed around them. Actually, the old town area was established around
circularly the Jokhang Monastery because the action of circumambulation. This is an
example of how walking affects the formation of landscape as Ingold states:
72
The forms of the landscape—like the identities and capacities of its human
inhabitants—are not imposed upon a material substrate but rather emerge as
condensations or crystallisations of activity within a relational field. As people, in
the course of their everyday lives, make their way by foot around a familiar terrain,
so its paths, textures and contours, variable through the seasons, are incorporated
into their own embodied capacities of movement, awareness and response. (Ingold
2011: 47)
These paths act as the bridge connecting the mundane and sacred worlds, bringing people
into a “close geometrical—almost physical—relationship” with sacred sites and objects
(Larsen and Sinding-Larsen 2001: 173). From short to long, they are: nang skor, bar skor,
rtse skor (tsé kor), gling skor (ling kor) and two variants of gling skor: stod skor (tö kor) and
smud skor (mü kor) (Zhang 2006: 41-63). Among them gling skor and bar skor are also the
official names of the streets on the map; the other four are traditionally known. Maps here are
for non-Tibetan tourists, Tibetan pilgrims gain and exchange information in the sweet tea
houses where Tibetans in Lhasa usually go first each day.
Nang Skor
The first circumambulation path is nang skor ‘inner path’. It is the path inside the Jokhang
Monastery around the main chapel alongside with the stationary prayer wheels. People
usually rotate those prayer wheels while circumambulating, when passing by the small
shrines on the path, they will go to prostrate themselves and circumambulate around the main
deities in each shrine, and then return to the nang skor and continue walking. Thus the
circumambulation of nang skor contains many small circumambulations. In addition, three
floors of the Jokhang Monastery have circular corridors. By walking around them, they form
73
three vertical circumambulations (Zhang 2006: 41-42). Currently, the Jokhang Monastery is
open separately in a day, with mornings for Tibetans and afternoons for non-Tibetans, since
most Tibetans are believers and most non-Tibetans are tourists. Believers are free whereas
tourists pay a lot; guards of the monastery distinguish them by their appearance and speech.
And so, unfortunately, I have not had the chance to see Tibetans circumambulate in person at
the monastery, but I have seen the numerous offerings they have left there when I
circumambulated in the afternoon.
Map 5. Nang Skor. Source: Tibetan Heritage Fund.
Bar Skor
The second circumambulation path is bar skor ‘intermediate path’, it is the path around the
whole Jokhang Monastery. This path is considered the sacred path which leads the way to
heaven (Zhang 2006: 42-44). Crowd of people keep flowing never stopping in daytime. As
the central business district in Lhasa, it is lined with stores instead of prayer wheels. Locals
and tourists come here to shop, and then circumambulate the Jokhang Monastery, which
74
indicates the start of each day. Therefore, bar skor is a mixed area midway between religious
and mundane life.
I walked on bar skor several times; it is about 900 m long. There are more people who
choose to do full body prostration on this path than other places. When I asked some pilgrims
about the reason why, they told me that they believe it can gain the most merit to do it here;
and even more can be gained if they do it in the Jokhang Monastery, but they cannot because
of the crowds of people in there. So bar skor is place which well maximizes the balance
between practical feasibility and the merit pilgrims can gain.
Map 6. Bar Skor. Source: Tibetan Heritage Fund.
Rtse Skor
The third circumambulation is rtze skor ‘top path’, it is the path around the Potala Palace,
running alongside with the highest numbers of prayer wheels in Lhasa. It gets its name
75
because the Potala Palace is built on the top of Mapori Hill and was the highest building in
Lhasa (Zhang 2006: 58-61). In my observations of Lhasa, there are more Han Chinese who
circumambulate here than other places, especially after dinner. I asked some of them about
their reasons for circumambulating, and they replied that they regarded it as exercise after a
meal and because of the beautiful scenery, instead of any religious meaning.
Map 7. Rtze Skor. Source: Tibetan Heritage Fund.
Gling Skor
The fourth and the longest circumambulation is gling skor ‘continent path’ or phyi skor ‘outer
path’. It is an 8 km-long path around the central area of Lhasa including most of the Potala
Palace, Jokhang Monastery, and other sacred sites (Zhang 2006: 49-51). It usually takes three
or four hours to circumambulate it. Generally, people who walk this path are elders who have
much time and do not need to work. However, during the Saga Dawa festival in April of the
76
Tibetan calendar, this path abounds with people, including locals and pilgrims from other
parts of Tibet. The whole month passes in circumambulation.
Map 8. Gling Skor. Source: Tibetan Heritage Fund.
Stod Skor and Smud Skor
The fifth and sixth circumambulation paths, stod skor ‘up path’ and smud skor ‘low path’, are
actually variants of gling skor. Hu Sheng Zhang firstly describes them in his doctoral
dissertation (Zhang 2006: 61-63). From the middle line of gling skor, namely the Kang Ang
Duo Road, the east part is stod skor and the west part is smud skor. It derives from the
direction of flow of the Lhasa River or kyichu (kyichu) in Tibetan, which flows from east to
west. Hence the east is upstream and the west is downstream (Zhang 2006: 62). These two
paths are for people who do not have time or energy to circumambulate gling skor.
77
Sacred Monasteries
In Buddhism, there are three important elements, called triratna, the ‘Three Jewels’. These
are Buddha, ‘the enlightened one’, meaning Shakyamuni or Buddhahood; Dharma, ‘the
teaching’, meaning the teaching of Buddha and the path to enlightenment; and Sangha, ‘the
community’, meaning the community of Buddhist practitioners, namely the monks and nuns
(Zhao 1993: 8). Taking refuge in the Three Jewels is regarded as the symbol of being a
formal Buddhist. In Tibetan Buddhism, there is a fourth jewel, the guru, which is Tibetan
Buddhists’ personal instructor who can give Tantric teaching. The place which has all Three
Jewels is the monastery, so the initial Jokhang Monastery was actually just a chapel.
Currently, according to the Chinese government, there are about 1,700 monasteries in Tibet
(Chinese Government White Paper, 2008). Each one of them is a sacred center in Tibet.
The Jokhang Monastery is regarded as the most sacred monastery because of its Buddha
Jewel, Jowo Rinpoche, the life-sized statue of Buddha at age twelve (see Figure 8). It is
believed that the statue was modeled from Shakyamuni himself when he was still alive (Lu
2001: 23-44). Therefore, Tibetan people consider seeing the statue as equal to seeing the
Buddha in person. They donate their precious jewels to add to the ostentatious clothes of the
statue and gilding it. It usually costs 350 RMB (about 60 CAD) to gild its face, and 7000
RMB (about 1200 CAD) to gild its full body and the faces of nearby deities. Those who gild
the statue have the privilege of circumambulating the statue closely, empowering their
amulets by touching the statue (Zhang 2006: 69). Huber also states this: “The closer one is to
this ideal centre the stronger the empowerment potential. This has consequences for the
ordering of space, and in all cases centrality and relative height are given priority over
periphery and relative lowness (Huber 1993: 29).”
78
Figure 8. Statue of Jowo Rinpoche. Source: Kagyu Media Lab.
At a place in front of the gate of Jokhang Monastery, pilgrims constantly do full body
prostration (see Figure 9), by which the floor has become polished over time. The highest
sacredness of Jokhang Monastery derives from this symbolic incarnation of Buddha. I
observed people doing full body prostrations there several times, one man attracting my
attention because he was a Han Chinese. After talking, he told me the whole ritual is to do
full body prostration 111,111 times, and he can do it 2,000 times per day. The reason he was
doing this was to heal his cardiac disease; before he did this he had tried qi gong and other
practices, but there were no results. When he accepted his friend’s advice and performed full
body prostration at the Jokhang Monastery, he felt much better, even though he was not a
Tibetan Buddhist.
79
Figure 9. Pilgrims do full body prostration in front of Jokhang Monastery. Photo by the author, 2012.
Another type of monastery models the Buddhist cosmology and the symbol of the mandala.
The mandala is reproduced constantly in Tibetan culture, as Huber states:
This [mandala] takes place in multiple ephemeral constructions, such as ritual and
gestures, the positioning of persons in certain ceremonial and performative events,
the heaped arrangement of grains and other offering substances in regular rituals or
the sustained and highly detailed mental productions generated in advanced forms
of Tantric meditation. (Huber 1993: 49)
The permanent mandala is the architectural form like monastery. A representative example is
the Samye Monastery in Lhoka prefecture, 200 km southeast of Lhasa (see Figure 10). It was
the first monastery, in strict definition, namely having the Three Jewels. It was established by
the second religious king, Trisong Detson, under the supervision of Padmasambhava in the
8th century. The architecture of the Smaye Monastery is based on the design of Odantapuri
80
Monastery in Bihar, India (Huang 2010: 66-67). According to the Tibetan text sab bzhed (sap
zhé), which specifically recorded the building process of the Samye Monastery, its main
chapel symbolizes Mount Meru and the chapels surrounding it symbolize the four continents
and eight subcontinents. To be specific, the eastern three chapels in half-circle shape
symbolize Purvavideha, Videhas, and Dehas; the south three chapels in scapula-shape
symbolize Jambudvipa, Chamaras and Avaracamaras; the west three chapels in circular shape
symbolize Godaniya, Uttaramantrins and Shathas; and the north three chapels in triangular
shape symbolize Uttarakuru, Kurus, and Kauravas. In addition, the sun chapel and the moon
chapel symbolize the Sun and the Moon. Finally, the outer wall symbolizes the Ring of Iron
Mountains (Huang 2010: 69-70). Therefore, the Samye Monastery expresses the universe in
architectural form. After construction was completed, seven Tibetans received Buddhist
monastic ordination and constituted the first sangha in Tibet (Huang 2010: 75-76). Over time,
some particular buildings have been destroyed. Since its restoration, the Samye Monastery
still keeps the basic shape of a mandala, though some details have been lost. In its threestoried main chapel, there is corridor on each floor for circumambulation. When people
circumambulate this cosmological type of monastery, they can visualize that they
circumambulate the world, and hence maximize merit both spiritually and symbolically.
81
Figure 10. Samye Monastery. Source: Tibet China Travel Service.
82
Chapter IV. Prayer Wheels as Micro Circuit
Prayer wheels or praying wheels are the wheel-shape ritualistic instruments for worship in
many religions like Hinduism, Brahmanism, and Buddhism. However, they have not been in
active use outside of Tibet and Mongolia since the 19th century (Simpson 1896: 32). To my
knowledge, the first monograph to focus on prayer wheels is The Buddhist Praying-Wheel,
written by William Simpson in 1896. His interest was first aroused by the prayer wheels he
saw in Tibet; he then started to collect data on wheels and circular movement in different
cultures. Due to limitations of time, some of his descriptions are outdated and presumptions
are oversimplified; however, he still made a big contribution to this research subject and gave
a direction for future researchers.
In the time of Simpson, the Buddhist praying wheel had not gained serious attention; people
talked of it as a jokingly as “rotatory calabash” (Simpson 1896:4). Simpson states that the
name “praying wheel” was a misnomer because it is not an instrument for praying; instead, it
is for praising because the mantra carved on its outer surface, om mani padme hum means
‘adoration to the Jewel in the Lotus, amen!’(Simpson 1896: 28). He argued that the mantra
has often been misrepresented as a prayer, and therefore “praising wheel” would be a more
appropriate name than prayer wheel (Simpson 1896: 26-27). No matter which name is more
accurate in English, the Tibetan term for prayer wheel, mani chos khor (mani chö kor)
literally means ‘precious dharma wheel’. Most Tibetan people do not know the meaning of
the mantra or the history of the prayer wheel; they just rotate it for merit. For them, the prayer
wheel is just an instrument to gain more merit no matter whether the original purpose was
prayer or praise.
83
In terms of the origin of the prayer wheel, Simpson assumed that it has a solar origin because
of its rotatory direction and description in ancient Indian sacred texts. In Satapatha
Brahmana and Grihya-Sutras, pradakshina, a Sanskrit term for circumambulation, must be
performed from left to right—going round with the right side to the sacred center—namely
the sun’s course (Simpson 1896: 92-93). In addition, Simpson finds that sunwise direction is
universal in many circular movements of different cultures; it means the right movement, and
the reverse direction will lead to bad results (Simpson 1896: 75-77, 88, 97), but there are still
exceptions of anti-sunwise movement like twarf , a circumambulation performed by Muslims,
and also in Bon. As for the Tibetan prayer wheels, Simpson had no direct evidence to prove
the solar origin, but he stated that Buddhists borrowed the wheel from the Brahmans, so
Tibetan Buddhism may also have borrowed prayer wheels and solar symbolism (Simpson
1896: 94).
According to Mani Kabum (mani kabum), a Tibetan Buddhist text written in the late 11th
century which focuses on the practice of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva, Nagarjuna, a famous
Indian Buddhist philosopher in the 2nd century, gave the prayer wheel practice to Lion-faced
Dakini, then she gave it to Padmasambhava, who brought it into Tibet with Buddhism in the
7th century (Lama Zopa Rinpoche 1994). Ekvall also mentions that the earliest known
reference to a prayer wheel is said to occur in a biography of Milarepa named Songs of Mi La
in the early 11th century (Ekvall 1964: 122). I have been unable to more fully answer this
question, which still needs more archaeological and textual study; at least in terms of portable
prayer wheels, one Tibetan archaeologist named Shag Wangdu I interviewed said that they
have not found any trace of it in archaeological sites, and he assumes it may have come from
China not long ago.
84
Unlike the flat wheel-shaped praying wheels previously used in India, the Tibetan prayer
wheel is a cylindrical wheel on a spindle made from metal, stone, wood, leather, or coarse
cotton, usually decorated with carnelian, turquoise, and other jewels. On its outer surface is
carved the mantra of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva om mani padme hum, and inside the prayer
wheel is one of various sutras (see Figure 12). There is also a heavy pendant chained to the
cylinder, and this is what allows it to be rotated easily by twisting one’s wrist. The size of
prayer wheels varies from tiny finger-size ones to giant ones more than 20 m high, the one I
bought in Lhasa for about 80 CAD (see Figure 11) is 30 cm tall and 1 kg in weight; the
cylinder is made of bronze with carnelian and turquoise on its surface, the handle is made of
wood and bone. There is no mantra carved on the surface, but it has a roll of script on which
om mani padme hum is repeatedly written inside the cylinder (see Figure 12). People believe
that rotating one circle of the prayer wheel is equal to one recitation of the mantra or the sutra
within it. The seller told me that it is from western Tibet and is about 100 years old. I do not
quite believe it because the generality of fake antiques in Tibet, especially the things sold to
tourists like me.
85
Figure 11. Outer appearance of prayer wheel. Photo by the author, 2014.
Figure 12. Inner script of prayer wheel. Photo by the author, 2014.
As for the dynamic nature of prayer wheels, traditionally they are powered manually, or by
natural forces like fire, wind, and water. People believe that the wind which moves the prayer
wheels will benefit the places where it blows; the water which moves the prayer wheel will
86
benefit the places where it flows. Depending on the local environment and budget, people
choose different prayer wheels. In one monastery around Lake Manasarovar, I even found a
wind prayer wheel which uses recycled bowls of noodle soup to move it (see Figure 13).
Figure 13. Noodle soup wind prayer wheel. Photo by the author, 2012.
With the development of technology, electronic prayer wheels, prayer wheel DVDs and
prayer wheel software have appeared (see Figure 14). There are two types of software prayer
wheels: one is a program that spins prayer wheels automatically; the other is a 3D
touchscreen model of a prayer wheel you need to swipe the screen to rotate. Additionally,
some programs have counter to count the times of the prayer wheels have been spun, and
play the record of the mantra om mani padme hum while spinning. Some Buddhists may
87
doubt the power of these new prayer wheels; however, some lamas and rinpoches
acknowledged that these new prayer wheels have the same effectiveness as traditional ones.
Figure 14. The application “Prayer Wheel 3D” on iPhone. Screenshot by the author, 2014.
In terms of how to use prayer wheels, according to Simpson’s book, a lama taught him how
to rotate the prayer wheels properly:
Before turning these wheels, the performer should repeat the Mantra, else he will
derive no merit from it; while he is turning, he may repeat the words as often as
possible, and at the end a repetition is necessary, or the whole of the performance
will be useless. The wheel should be moved round in the direction that a person
would go if he turned round an object with his right hand to the centre. To turn the
wheel in the other direction produces an evil result; and, if I mistake not, such a
88
motion is believed to undo any merit that had been previously produced by turning
it in the right manner. (Simpson 1896: 28-29)
Although Simpson’s description was made more than 100 years ago, nowadays Tibetan
people still follow this turning way, except for Bon believers who rotate it in reverse. In
addition, some technologies I mentioned earlier have changed the way people use prayer
wheels.
Tibetan people usually rotate the prayer wheels to gain benevolent karma and avoid
malevolent karma. Karma is a core concept in Buddhism, being actions or deeds that cause
samsara. It can be divided into benevolent karma and malevolent karma. All the karma is
made by body, speech, and mind. There are ten malevolent karmas in the Vinaya, the
Buddhist discipline: killing, stealing, and unlawful sexual intercourse are made by the body;
lying, slander, rudeness, and foolish babble are made by the speech; greed, hatred, and
delusion are made by the mind and are considered the three root karma that lead to pain and
unenlightenment (Nyanatiloka 1980: 150). To avoid the malevolent karma and gain merit,
people need to self-cultivate through body, speech, and mind. Rotating a prayer wheel is a
practice that can simultaneously engage the three parts in virtue: rotating the prayer wheels
with the body, reciting the mantra of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva by speech, and performing
particular contemplation and visualization by mind (Ladner 2000: 6). Because of its
convenience for everyone, including the illiterate and people who are unable to speak, some
pious Tibetans rotate the prayer wheel as often as they possibly can15, especially elders. Some
of them told me they treat it as a part of their life, like eating and sleeping. Relatively, young
Tibetans do not rotate them as often as elders; they prefer turning stationary prayer wheels
However, during the period in Lhasa, I seldom saw the lamas rotate prayer wheels. It may because they can gain
more merit through Tantric practice and their destination is the Buddhahood instead of painless samsara.
15
89
during circumambulation or using electronic prayer wheels; I found many drivers put them in
their cars to pray for safety when I was in Tibet.
In my opinion, the factors deciding the merit gained by rotating prayer wheels are: size, time
and number. The portable ones can be brought everywhere, and though they are small, people
can rotate them for a long time when they are free, and hence accumulate merit for the
duration of rotation. The gigantic ones are usually found in particular shrines; for that they
are called mani lha khang (mani la kang) ‘shrine of prayer wheel’, and people accumulate
merit from their significant power. For example, the largest prayer wheel, in Zhong Dian
County, Yunnan Province, is 21 m tall and weighs 60 tons. It is said that turning it one full
rotation equals reciting the mantra 1,240,000 times.
Rotating different times of prayer wheels will gain different merit, according to Mani ’khor
lo’I phan yon (mani kor lo pen yön) ‘The Benefits of the Mani Wheel’, a typical Tibetan work
on the mantra, rotating prayer wheels different numbers of times has varied benefits:
The benefit of turning the [prayer] wheel once is equal to reading the translation of
the [India] treatises (bstan ’gyur [ten gyur]) once. Turning it twice is equal to
reading the words of the Conqueror [the Buddha] once. Turning it three times
purifies the obstructions of body, speech, and mind. Turning it ten times purifies
sins equal to Mount Meru. Turning it one hundred times makes one equal to the
king of dharma Yama [the Lord of Death]. Turning it one thousand times, one
understands the meaning of the dharmakāma for one’s own welfare. Turning it ten
thousand times, one brings about the welfare of oneself and other sentient beings.
Turning it one hundred thousand times, one is reborn in the retinue of
90
Avalokiteśvara. Turning it ten million times, the sentient beings of the six realms
attain the ocean of bliss. (Lopez 1998: 130)
Rotating many prayer wheels at one time could also gain more merit, like the large number of
stationary prayer wheels along the circumambulatory paths of the monasteries. For instance,
the circumambulatory path around the Potala Palace has 1,836 prayer wheels (Zhang 2006:
84, see Figure 15), people told me they believe the prayer wheels there are more powerful
and they can get more merit by rotating them.
Figure 15. Stationary prayer wheels around the Potala Palace. Photo by the author, 2012.
By comparing with circumambulation, I argue that rotating a prayer wheel is similar to
circumambulation for the following reasons. First, a prayer wheel is gnas in Tibetan thinking;
thus it has the same sacredness as landscapes, monasteries, etc. Second, rotating the prayer
wheels shares the same ritual model as circumambulation, namely, circular movement around
a sacred center. In circumambulation, it is the person who walks around the sacred center on
91
foot, while in rotating a prayer wheel, the pendant on the outer surface of portable ones, or
the cylinder of stationary ones can be regarded as a symbol of the person. In this way, prayer
wheels can be seen as “spinning on behalf of the one who walks” (Ekvall 1964: 233). To be
more exact, rotating prayer wheels is a circumrotation around sacred center. Third, people
usually rotate the prayer wheels while circumambulating to enhance merit, especially in the
case of stationary prayer wheels which must be rotated by walking people. In Lhasa, I
observed that a group of old women rotated the stationary prayer wheels around the Potala
Palace while circumambulating. When they took a rest in the middle, they took out their
portable prayer wheels from bags and started to rotate them. After about 10 minutes, they
went back to circumambulating and spinning the stationary ones. Thus I consider that rotating
the prayer wheels without walking can be regarded as a substitute or continuance of
circumambulation.
92
Chapter V. Interpretation of Circumambulation in Tibet
From ethnographic accounts of circumambulation in Tibet, we know the specific expression
of varied types of circumambulation. To interpret these, I would extract two core factors: the
first is the concept of sacredness, and the second is the symbolic meaning of the circle and
circular movement. Thus, I propose a model of circumambulation in Tibet to understand it
more fully.
The Concept of Sacredness in Tibetan Culture
Human beings have a natural fear of the unknown and they tend to deify or demonize the
unknown to deal with this fear. Some people worship nature, such as the sun, animals, and
landscapes. Edward Tylor named this belief “animism” to emphasize the role of the soul
(Tylor 1920: 23). Tibetan religions are not monotheistic, and Tibetan people have kept the
concept of animism, thus making the Tibetan pantheon complicated and multifarious. As I
mentioned before, Bon is animistic and polytheistic—wind, thunder, hail, mountain, lake,
animal, house, all are considered to have souls and therefore are cultivated as people’s objects
of worship (Liu 2008: 116). Tibetan Buddhism has absorbed most of these and turns them
into the Buddhist pantheon.
In the Tibetan context, this animism, called bla, the ‘vitality’ or ‘life-power’ principle, is an
indigenous notion which relates to the conceptions both of person and of place” (Huber 1993:
16). This bla exists in gnas, which is translated most often as ‘place’ (‘lieu’, ‘Platz’) and less
often as ‘locality’ and ‘site’ in Western sources. The concept of gnas carries “the meaning ‘to
exist’, ‘to be’, ‘reside’ or ‘abide’, ‘to stay’ or ‘remain’, and even ‘condition [of existence]’”
93
(Huber 1993: 14). Tibetans believe that “the physical environment in both its animate and
inanimate dimensions is occupied by a host of deities and spirits forces” (Huber 1993: 15),
and thus the physical environment becomes gnas. In addition, bla does not just reside in the
physical landscapes like mountains and lakes, it also lives in the human body, other living
organisms such as animals and trees, and in things like stones (Huber 1993: 16). The gnas,
including landscape, monasteries, people, and so on, where bla resides within, is sacred in
Tibet, and thus the bla makes them become the objects for circumambulation. In the Tibetan
context, gnas is a form the bla exists in, and a relation between bla and people, rather than a
physical concept of the “place” in English, is the relationship Tibetans usually recognize
between people and the world.
Although there are many divine dyads in the Tibetan pantheon, there is no absolute binary
opposition—goodness and evilness—in the concept of sacredness. In other words, it is not
only the gods and goodness that are the objects of worship, but also the demons known as
dregs pa (drek pa) and dreg pa pho mo (drek pa po mo). The landscape of the Tibetan
Plateau is considered to be a supine srin mo (sin mo) ‘demoness’. The srin are fierce
indigenous evil spirits and were later identified with the Indian rakshasa (Gyatso 1989: 35).
Tibetan Buddhist texts said that people are the descendants of a holy macaque and a rakshasi
‘female rakshasa’, namely the srin mo (Gyaltsen 2000: 30-32). This ambiguity of goodness
and evilness in the concept of sacredness does not conflict with Tibetan Buddhism. By
contrast, Tibetan Buddhism absorbed these demons and employed them as the protectors of
dharma because of their wrath and ferocity. Unlike the peaceful-looking deities in Mahayana
tradition, the same deities appear in wrathful forms in the Tantric tradition of Tibetan
Buddhism. These wrathful demons and deities in wrathful forms are more popular and are
worshipped more. The representative example is Palden Lhamo (paden lamo), the protector
94
of the Dalai Lama, the Gelukpa and Lhasa, who is the wrathful incarnation of the goddess
Shri Devi in Hinduism. According to the iconographic compendium known as the Rin byung
(rin jung), one form of Palden Lhamo is as follows:
[…] the goddess is of a dark-blue hue, has one face, two hands, and rides on a mule.
With her right hand she brandishes a huge sandal-wood club adorned with a
thunderbolt and with her left hand she holds in front of her breast the blood-filled
skull of a child, born out of an incestuous union. She wears a flowing garment of
black silk and a loin-cloth made of a rough material. Her ornaments are a diadem of
skulls, a garland of freshly-cut heads, a girdle of snake, and bone ornaments, and
her whole body is covered with the ashes of cremated corpses. She has three eyes,
bares her fangs, and her hair on her head stands on end. A khram shing [tram
shing]16 is stuck into her girdle and she carries a sack full of diseases and a pair of
dice. Above her head is a panoply of peacock-feathers. In her retinue appear
countless bdud [dü]17, black birds, black dogs and black sheep. (NebeskyWojkowitz 1996: 25)
Besides their symbolic meanings, the horrible weapons and decorations of wrathful protective
deities can enhance their power. Similarly, offerings to them are also horrible, and can
include human blood, organs, and other objects (Nebesky-Wojkowitz 1996: 343-345). For
this kind of deities, wrath and ferocity are features that need to be maintained and
strengthened rather than subdued. The more wrathful they are, the more power they have, and
the more helpful for the protection of Buddhism. The wrathful deities are also common in
mundane affairs like summoning rain, removing the curses, healing illness, and so forth. This
16
17
The plate used for catching ghosts.
Demons.
95
concept may derive from the extremely harsh environment of Tibet in which productivity is
low. Therefore, a concept of using wrath to defeat wrath has formed. This concept is widely
employed in witchcraft, magic, and sorcery. For example, in the heavily forested part of
southwestern China, indigenous minorities believed in gu, which is a kind of witchcraft
involving poisonous creatures. Putting many poisonous insects and animals such as spiders,
scorpions, snakes, and centipedes into a sealed urn to let them kill each other, the last one
surviving is called gu. It is believed that this gu has omnipotent power like deities, and
feeding it poisonous objects can enhance its power (Deng 1999: 52-59). Tantric Buddhism
has survived and flourished in Tibet, whereas in other places it was considered nonBuddhism and was eradicated, like in China and India. I think this ambiguity of sacredness is
perhaps one reason.
Following the introduction of Buddhism, many indigenous concepts of sacredness have been
absorbed into Buddhism by the process of “Buddhicisation”. Toni Huber has given a good
summary of the two main methods of this process:
[…] [There are] two principal sources of authority to identify sacred sources. The
main type is visionary authority, based upon “pure visions” (dag-snang [dak nang])
of particular landscapes experiences by Tantric lamas in altered states of
consciousness, during meditations, dreams and so forth. The “gap” which exists
between a pilgrims’ mundane experience of a holy place and the splendored dagsnang type visionary accounts of an environment’s sublime features and properties
is technically explained by authors in terms of traditional theories of graded
perceptions and cognitive abilities which are related to an individual’s karmic (i.e.
moral) status, degrees of embodied psycho-physical defilement (sgrib-gnyis [drip
96
nyi]) and thus their extent of spiritual progress towards awakening. The second type
is prophetic authority in the form of citation and analysis of “prophecies” (lungbtsan [lung tsen]) reputedly made by Buddhas, deities, recognised saints or highly
realized lamas about the identity of particular holy places. (Huber 1997: 306)
Through visualization and prophecy, many territorial deities have become Buddhist deities.
Although the attribution of sacredness has changed, their nature has not. By relating the
particular topographical forms to great historical events, they are regarded as the results of
these events: magic battles, struggles of powers, and so forth. Therefore, places and objects in
the natural environment are empowered by the presence and actions of the deities and saints,
and so obtain sacredness (Huber 1997: 121). For example, on the circumambulation path
around Mount Kailash, there is a stone which is considered sacred because it was used in the
magical contest between Milarepa and Na Ro Bon Chuang. The pattern of relationship
between the sacred objects and people, and the method of how people deal with this
relationship, form the concept of sacredness in Tibet.
Symbolic Meaning of the Circle and Circular Movement
People’s relationship with sacredness is moderated through worship. Different cultures have
varied ways to worship; among them, prostration is widespread. It is essentially a way to
elevate the divinity and subordinate the humanity in order to emphasize the gap between god
and human. In Tibetan society, besides the prostration, Tibetans go on pilgrimage or
circumambulate sacred objects to worship and form certain relationships with a gnas. They
use different ways to achieve this aim, as Huber states:
97
Mental and physical acts structure this relationship at various levels, which can
involve types of representational synthesis and identification (by
visualization/mediation), and a host of actual physical contacts, both those that are
tangible and others that are believed to be sublime. Most commonly it is about a
direct (and observable) physical, sensory relationship of person and place through
seeing (in both the sense of direct encounter and “reading” and interpreting
landscape, etc.), touching (by contacting the place), positioning (body in relation to
place), consuming/tasting (by ingesting place substance), collecting (substances of
the place), exchanging (place substance with personal substances/possessions),
vocalizing (prayers addressed to the place or specific formulas), and eve in some
cases listening (for sounds produced by the place). (Huber 1993: 24-25)
All the acts Huber mentions are done by people while they circumambulate sacred objects.
However, why do Tibetans choose this circular movement over other forms?
Geometrically, the circle is a round planar figure whose boundary consists of points
equidistant from a fixed point, namely the center of circle. It is a natural shape that can
readily be found in nature, such as the sun and the moon. Therefore, ancient beliefs are often
connected with circles: Stonehenge, Tai Chi, and so forth. The mythology of sun deities is so
prevalent around the world that Max Müller argues, “The whole of mythology is solar” (cited
in Lang 1897: xxii). Furthermore, the circle as a symbol also indicates the worldview of
particular cultures. For instance, consider the example of the Oglala Lakota, a Native
American people, in Paul Radin’s work, as cited by Clifford Geertz:
98
The Oglala believe the circle to be sacred because the great spirit caused everything
in nature to be round except stone. Stone is the implement of destruction. The sun
and the sky, the earth and the moon are round like a shield, though the sky is deep
like a bowl. Everything that breathes is round like the stem of a plant. Since the
great spirit has caused everything to be round mankind should look upon the circle
as sacred, for it is the symbol of all things in nature except stone. It is also the
symbol of the circle that makes the edge of the world and therefore of the four
winds that travel there. Consequently it is also the symbol of the year. The day, the
night, and the moon go in a circle above the sky. Therefore the circle is symbol of
these divisions of time and hence the symbol of all time.
For these reasons the Oglala make their tipis circular, their camp-circle circular,
and sit in a circle at all ceremonies. The circle is also the symbol of the tipi and
shelter. If one makes a circle for an ornament and it is not divided in any way, it
should be understood as the symbol of the world and of time. (Geertz 1973: 128)
Similarly, artificial structures as well as natural objects serve as the center of the universe and
human life. In Mongolian culture, the round yurt is considered to be not only the cosmic
center, but also a microcosm in itself, a concentration of all the traditions of the country and a
miniature representation of the cosmos. It is a remarkably round world ordered in time and
space, where everything falls in to place. The movements in the yurt accord with the course
of the sun, namely clockwise (Mauvieux, Reinberg, and Touitou 2014: 152-154). Just so, the
Tibetan prayer wheel expresses the core sacred concept and circumambulation in miniature,
as I discussed earlier.
99
In Tibetan context, its worldview is based on the Buddhist worldview, in which the world is a
wheel consisting of six realms: the human realm, the heavenly realm, the realm of strife and
conflict (asura realm), the realm of animals, the realm of hell, and the realm of frustrated
craving (preta or ‘hungry ghosts’). People will be reborn in various realms depending on
their varied karma (Lama Anagarika Govinda 1973: 234-247). This is known as the samsara,
the wheel of death and rebirth, and is expressed vividly in the murals of monasteries and
thangkas. The first three realms are considered the three benevolent realms, and the latter
three are the malevolent realms. Among the three benevolent realms, although the heavenly
realm is painless, it is not as interesting as the human realm, and the asura realm is filled with
conflict. Common Tibetan people wish to be born again in the human realm by accumulating
merit. For practitioners of Tibetan Buddhism, their ultimate goal is to archive the
enlightenment and escape samsara.
100
Figure 16. Tibetan Wheel of Life. Source: Lama Anagarika Govinda 1973.
In the center of the wheel of life, there are three animals symbolizing the three malevolent
karmas made by the mind: greed, hatred and delusion, which are considered the root motives
of unenlightenment and the samsara. The three animals bite each other’s tails and are
connected with each other, thus forming a circle again because greed, hatred and delusion are
inseparably linked (Lama Anagarika Govinda 1973: 238). The outer rims features the twelve
dependent originations in one lifetime, from blindness to death; these causes and effects,
along with the three mind karma, lead to suffering and are the dynamic of the wheel of life
101
that make it rotate endlessly. This circular worldview indicates the Tibetan view of life: it is
circular and endless instead of linear. This is one reason why Tibetans spend much time to
performing religious practice.
Figure 17. Symbols and Meaning of Wheel of Life. Source: Kafka-metamorphosis.
Similarly, the concept of time in Tibet is also circular. Unlike the Gregorian calendar, which
is linear, the Tibetan calendar has a 60-year cycle, similar to the Chinese sexagenary cycle. It
combines the 12 animals—rabbit, dragon, snake, horse, goat, monkey rooster, dog, pig, rat,
ox and tiger—and five elements—fire, earth, iron, water, and wood—and each year also has a
gender. For example, 2012 is male water dragon year, 2013 is female water snake year, 2014
is male wood horse year, 2015 is female wood goat year, and so forth.
102
In terms of the relationship between symbolic meaning and its external expression, Geertz
commented on the circle in Oglala Lakota culture that the symbolic meanings of circle “once
abstracted, can then be employed for ritual purposes (Geertz 1973: 128).” There are some
geometric characteristics of a circle: if a person started to walk from one point along
circumference of a circle, eventually he will return to the starting point, and there is never an
end; a circle is a closed figure without any blemish; a circle is flexible without any angles. In
my opinion, the symbolic meanings of all these characteristics in the context of Tibetan
culture are endlessness, recurrence, perfection, and adaptation, which are expressed by its
worldview, material culture, and activities performed in a circular fashion. Circular routes in
pilgrimage do not necessarily form the shape of a perfect circle, but they consist of a closed
traverse (Stoddard 1997: 52). In the Tibetan context, circumambulation is the ritual way to
express the circle. Although they are not always geometrically perfect circles in reality, they
must be closed loops; this is one basic rule of all circular rituals and symbols, as Ekvall states:
“Nothing has been gained if the full circuit has not been completed” (Ekvall 1964: 233).
Besides the worldview I presented earlier, material culture, including architecture and
paintings, are the concretization of this circular worldview. For example, the sand mandalas,
these are delicate models made of colorful sands by lamas before Tantric practices which can
offer protection and help with visualization (Hou 2011: 34). They usually take three or four
day to make and are destroyed once the practice is completed to symbolize the concept of
emptiness in Buddhism. Sand mandalas are a combination of art and ritual indicating the
circular nature of Buddhist cosmology and philosophy.
In Tibetan meditation, there are seven psychic centers in the human body, known as chakras
‘wheel of power’ in Hinduism. They are located in the brain, middle of the eyebrow, throat,
103
heart, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and tailbone (Lama Anagarika Govinda 1973: 140146). By the spinning of these chakras, energy circulates in the human body. It is considered
the natural way that energy moves in nature. Therefore, Tibetans perform circular movements
to adapt this natural flow of energy in order to be maximally empowered.
Tibetan people use the form of circular movement to establish their relationships with space,
time, and sacredness, and also express them in visual forms of material and non-material
culture. Even when they make tsamba, using fingers to stir yak butter tea and fried hulless
barley in bowls, the direction of stirring is clockwise (Ekvall 1964: 235). The core element
they strive for is the circular form, rather than specific methods to do circular movement. For
example, although according to Buddhist texts, they must walk during pilgrimage, which is
said can obtain more merit (Buffetrille 2004: 2), some people actually ride horses or drive
automobiles to circumambulate the sacred objects, as I observed in Tibet. This fact also
expresses the symbolic meaning of adoption.
A Concentric Circle Model of Circumambulation in Tibet
Through discussion of the sacredness and symbolic meaning of circular movement, which are
the two core elements of circumambulation, I have identified the crucial aspects of
circumambulation in its varied forms of expression, hence establishing a concentric circle
model around a sacred center. In Tibetan society, the highest sacredness is Buddha. Different
scales of circumambulation form the concentric circles around this utmost sacred center.
Using the structure of the solar system as an analogy, the planets and other objects move
around the Sun because of its gravitation; each planet has a moon or moons moving around it
104
because of gravitation of their own. According to Newton’s law of universal gravitation,
every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly
proportional to be the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the
distance between them (Serway and Jewett 2010: 375). To be specific, the Sun attracts the
Earth to move around it with its significant gravitation coming from its significant mass, and
the Moon moves around the Earth rather than being attracted by the Sun because it is a short
distance from the Earth, although the gravitation of the Earth is much less than the Sun’s.
Buddha
(inner)
Monastery
City
Landscape
(outer)
Figure 18. Concentric Circle Model of Circumambulation in Tibet. Made by the author, 2013.
.
In the concentric circle model of circumambulation in Tibet, the circle’s center is Buddha or
the nature of Buddha. In concretized form, it can refer to the statue of Jowo Rinpoche in the
Jokhang Monastery or other objects symbolizing the nature of Buddha like statues, thangkas
and stupas. Therefore, it is the same center symbolizing of Buddha, although it occurs in
varied forms in different places. As the term “spiritual magnetism” has the deficiency I stated
earlier, I would like to use what I call “sacred gravitation” to interpret circumambulation,
which generally is directly proportional to be the product of its sacredness and inversely
105
proportional to the feasibility of being there. The degree of sacredness is decided by the
power or status of the sacred object. For example, as the most sacred statue with the most
sacred power in Tibet, the Jowo Rinpoche can attract pilgrims from remote parts of Tibet or
even outside of Tibet; however, it is not easy for people who are poor to go there and
circumambulate it. Instead, those people circumambulate local sacred sites or monasteries to
gain merit. The sacred gravitation of a particular sacred object may vary for temporal,
political, or other reasons. For instance, Mount Kailash attracts more pilgrims during the
auspicious Year of the Horse.
The circumferences of different lengths in this model indicate circular movement, which is
the way Tibetans venerate sacred objects and gain merit. The sacred gravitation which a
person receives is equal to the power or merit which can be received; being closer to a sacred
object allows more power and merit to be obtained. The different types of circumambulation
around sacred landscapes, cities and monasteries ritually express this principle and the
distance relationship (from outer to inner) between sacredness and people. For example,
people in Lhasa also called the path of circumambulation around the Jowo Rinpoche nang
skor, and hence what was previously referred to as nang skor around the main chapel of Jowo
Rinpoche becomes bar skor and the previous bar skor around the Jokhang Monastery
becomes gling skor (Zhang 2006: 42). Such closer circumambulation can obtain more merit
from its shorter distance to the sacred object; the larger circumambulation can obtain more
merit by virtue of its length and duration around the object.
Circumambulation ritually embodies the Tibetan worldview of sacredness, time and space.
This model indicates not only the pattern of circumambulation, but also the pattern of
relationship between the Tibetan worldview and Tibetans. Tibetans consider time to be
106
endless and circular rather than linear. As for space, sacred space in Tibet is established by
circumambulation, namely, the space formed by the circular movement around the sacred
center, vice versa, to experience that sacredness, people must move around it.
Religious Involution and Pragmatism
When I was in Tibet in 2012, I saw Tibetans piously circumambulate sacred places and
perform full body prostration. In the meantime, I also saw Tibetans use electronic prayer
wheels, a method which seems somewhat like “cheating”. Why and how can these attitudes
coexist in Tibet?
William James divides religion into two categories: institutional religion and personal
religion. On the one side, institutional religion maintains the divinity and its essentials,
including worship, sacrifice, theology, ceremony, and ecclesiastical organizations; on the
other side, personal religion maintains humanity and its essentials, including conscience,
deserts, helplessness, and incompleteness (James 1902: 28-29). In the context of Tibetan
society, on the one side are the complicated monastic system, deliberate rituals, and esoteric
Tantric practices of Tibetan Buddhism. From the religious perspective, the aim of this
institutional Tibetan Buddhism is to achieve enlightenment and Buddhahood. On the other
side are the simple religious practices and isolated Tantric practices; the aim of this personal
Tibetan Buddhism is the search for solutions to mundane affairs and to gain rebirth in the
human realm painlessly. The gap between them is obvious and significant.
I think the reason for this gap is a religious involution based on the particular history and
environment of Tibet. Being in an enclosed high-altitude area surrounded by mountains,
107
communication between Tibet and outside places in ancient times was difficult to make.
Tibetan Buddhism therefore developed in a closed environment restricted to the Himalayan
region and had no opportunity to spread widely, unlike Islam and Christianity. In addition, its
political control of Tibet and the esoteric nature of Tantric Buddhism, which is the core of
Tibetan Buddhism, prohibited its spreading widely. The inner structure of Tibetan Buddhism
developed into an extremely delicate form. For common people who cannot be engaged in
the Tantric practices, which are the fastest and most convenient, they must find other ways to
maximize their merit. Since they cannot use the spiritual convenience of Tantric Buddhism,
they choose physical convenience instead. In this way, the substitute religious practices—
prayer wheels, wind-horse flags, circumambulation by automobile, and so forth are all
practiced. When I circumambulated Mount Kailash, I even encountered some people who
were too weak and unable to circumambulate themselves, and so hired others to do it for
them. However, Pranavananda mentions that some rich people will also do this
(Pranavananda 1950: 12). By such means, normal Tibetans maximize the efficiency and
effectiveness of gaining merit by regular practices in their own way.
This substitute method of self-cultivation not only expresses the adaptation in Tibetan
circular philosophy, but also indicates the pragmatism in Tibetan society. No matter whether
institutional or personal Tibetan Buddhism, they both accept it—wrathful demons as
protective deities and electronic prayer wheels are both good examples. It is embodied
vividly in the development of Tibetan Buddhism since 1959 when it was forced to face the
world, becoming a prevalent religion worldwide in a short time through processes of
globalization, localization, and secularization.
108
Chapter VI. Conclusion
The impetus for my research came from my curiosity about why Tibetans rotate prayer
wheels; however, I found this was not an easy question to answer. Therefore I wrote this
thesis, in which I have tried to answer three questions: (1) what is circumambulation in Tibet?
(2) what are the sacred objects at the center of people’s circumambulation? and (3) why do
Tibetans circumambulate sacred objects as religious practice?
In this thesis I reviewed both the English and Chinese literature about circumambulation in
Tibet, some of them are firstly mentioned in English in this area of research. Since my field
work in Tibet was short and I do not speak Tibetan, I cannot write a detailed ethnography.
Instead, I chose three representative cases of circumambulation in Tibet—Mount Kailash,
Lake Manasarovar and Lhasa—to do field work. And then in the thesis, I included an
essential introduction to Tibetan culture and Tibetan Buddhism, and autoethnographic
writings of my personal circumambulation to help readers to experience and understand it in
Tibet. To interpret circumambulation, I developed Preston’s concept of “spiritual magnetism”
and used my own term “sacred gravitation” to explain the circular rituals in Tibet, and
therefore consider rotating prayer wheels as one of them.
To understand this, it is necessary to know the Tibetan society. Religion is a core element of
Tibetan society and culture. Tibetan history features the dominance of religion through time;
from early Bon traditions to the ecclesiocracy of the Gelukpa, religion and politics have
interacted intensively and extensively. The relationship between them is ambiguous and
inseparable. This relationship led to the “demise of the lamaist state” (Goldstein 1989), but
also has brought worldwide attention to Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism since the 1960s. To
109
some extent, the history of Tibet is a history of religion. There are two main religions closely
engaged with Tibet. One is Bon, the indigenous religion, and the other is Buddhism, the
exotic religion from India. These two religions struggled with each other over the ages, and
influenced each other. Consequently, this process resulted in Buddhism absorbing Bon magic
and Bon absorbing Buddhist dharma. This Buddhism with Bon characteristics, with the
addition of Tantric tradition, is the Tibetan Buddhism that distinctively differs from other
Buddhist traditions.
With the dominance of Tibetan Buddhism, the indigenous Tibetan concept of sacredness,
gnas, has become connected with it or transformed into Buddhist sacredness, and therefore it
generated many sacred objects related to Buddhism including mountains, lakes, cities,
monasteries, statues, images, prayer wheels and so on. In addition, some lamas can also be
regarded as sacred as Tibetan tradition. These sacred places and sacred objects are the centers
of religious life in particular areas, some of them are even the centers of the whole Tibetan
cultural areas. In order to venerate them, to show respect, and to gain merit, Tibetans mainly
perform rituals of circular movement including circumambulation and rotating prayer wheels.
Pilgrimage in the Tibetan context is thus considered here as large-scale circumambulation.
This circular movement is the ritual expression of the circular philosophy of Tibet Buddhism
that includes the concepts of worldview, time, and space. To some extent, it also reflects the
nature worship of circle-shape objects, for example, the sunwise direction of
circumambulation. In the religious life of personal Tibetan Buddhism, circumambulation is
the symbolic medium between sacredness and secular life, and the method people use to
mediate the relationship between sacredness and themselves. This relationship forms a
religious field in Tibetan society, and the force of this field is what I have termed sacred
110
gravitation. In this field, sacred gravitation can define and explain the forms of
circumambulation in Tibet.
Circumambulation is a universal ritual in different cultures around the world. Although
varied cultures practice it in varied ways, it is essentially circular movement around a sacred
center. Therefore, the concept of sacred gravitation may also apply to circumambulation in
other cultures or other circular rituals. For example, circumambulation in Hinduism is known
as pradakshina ‘circumambulation of an object clockwise’ (Nakamura 1951: 346). This term
also refers to the circumambulatory path. As the origin place of both Hinduism and
Buddhism, circumambulation in Tibet may come from India and thus share many attributes—
for instance, diverse objects of worship including deities, temples, mountains, lakes, and so
forth. Unlike in Tibetan Buddhism, Hinduism pays a significant attention to water; as I
mentioned earlier, the Hindu term for pilgrimage, tirthayatra, literally means ‘a journey to a
place of water’, and so circumambulation around whole rivers is known. The Narmada River
is one of the most sacred rivers in India; circumambulation around it goes from its source to
its mouth and back again, a journey of 2,600 km on foot (India International Centre 2010: 25).
This is not what happens in Tibet, but it carries the same symbolic meaning, and perhaps
even more clearly, with the endless process going from beginning to end. Although the forms
of circumambulation in Tibet and India vary, they share some similar characteristics. In my
opinion, circumambulation is the means by which people deal with the sacred center or
objects in a bodily way, and circular movement is the choice of many cultures. However, it
still needs more researchers to testify and revise this concept in the future.
Comparing with other areas in Tibetology, study of circumambulation lacks enough attention.
And perhaps the textual study of Tibetan classics is not a best way to study a ritual in modern
111
society. The anthropological methods, such like interview and participant observation, are
more suitable to this kind of topic which involves physical movement and interaction. In the
anthropological field works, you can see how a ritual is performed in real life and its
differences and changes from what you read in books. During my field work in Tibet in 2012,
I found that the ways Tibetans do circumambulation has expanded as the development of
technology, they use modern vehicles instead of walking, and they also use electricity and
computer to rotate prayer wheels instead of human power and natural power. Therefore I
argued that common Tibetan believers have a pragmatic bent and strong adaption to the
modern technology to perform religious practices.
In addition, the anthropological way of thinking can provide new perspectives and
inspirations to study traditional topics of Tibetology differently. For example, Tim Ingold’s
specific focus of walking itself made me rethink circumambulation out of its religious
background, and interpret it under the perspective of bodily movement in high-altitude Tibet.
Thus circumambulation becomes not only a ritual to symbolize samara, but also a bodily
adaption to mountainous environment.
Although this thesis answered my questions, there are still some blanks to address in future
research. First, it lacks detailed personal case studies of pilgrimage and circumambulation in
Tibet including both Tibetan Buddhism and Bon. It is a good way to participate in an
individual pilgrim or pilgrimage group to observe the whole process of pilgrimage: why they
want to pilgrimage? How they prepare it? What are changes of body and mind during
pilgrimage? How are the profane aspects during pilgrimage? This research can provide a
micro perspective of personal experience of pilgrimage and circumambulation.
112
Second, how do Tibetan classics, oral traditions and lamas explain circumambulation? The
systematic textual studies and interview can provide not only a clear history of
circumambulation as a ritual in Tibet to help understand its developments and changes
through history, but also a theoretical interpretation of circumambulation from religious view.
This is a difficult work, but it has a significant academic value for future research in this topic,
it can answer some basic questions such like the origin of circumambulation in Tibet.
Third, how does circumambulation change in the future? This is an interesting question
because that the development of Tibet is much faster than before, you can see how it has
changed in a short period after the 1980s. Will they still be doing circumambulation after 50
years? In the article Visual Pilgrimage on the Internet, MacWilliams gives an example of a
website named Beliefnet.com provides online prayer circles and virtual Hajj to give Muslims
a virtual pilgrimage or cyberpilgrimage (MacWilliams 2002: 316-317). Because of the strong
adaption to modern technology and pragmatic bent of Tibetans I mentioned previously, I
guess Tibetans may have virtual pilgrimage to sacred sites and do the virtual
circumambulation on the Internet or use other alternatives to do circumambulation in the
future.
Circumambulation is a prolific phenomenon in many cultures. However, it relatively does not
get enough notice in anthropology. Tibet is also not a usual place for anthropological
fieldwork for historical and political reasons. We can use anthropological way to rethink
traditional topics in Tibetology; similarly, new Tibetan case studies can testify and revise
anthropological theories. By writing this thesis, I hope it could bring more attention to
circumambulation and to Tibet in anthropology.
113
Appendix. Tibetan Word List
Tibetan Spelling
agro
agro ba
agro bai bla ma
Phonetic Form
adro
adro ba
adro bai la ma
agro bai mgon po
adro bai gön po
agro ba rigs drug
agro ba rin chen
agro mchog
ba
bar skor
adro ba rik druk
adro ba rin chen
adro chok
ba
bar kor
bardo
bdud
bla
bod
bodpa
bon
bsang
bskor
bskor ra
bardo
dü
la
bö
bö pa
bön
sang
kor
kor ra
bstan gyur
byin
dag-snang
darchen
dmu thag
dorje
dreg pa
dregs pa pho mo
droma la
dud agro
gangs rinpoche
ten gyur
jin
dak nang
darchen
mu tak
dojé
drek pa
drek pa po mo
droma la
dü adro
gang rinpoché
gangs ti se
gang ti sé
geshe
geshé
glang chen gtsang po
gling skor
gnam thag
gnas
lang chen tsang po
ling kor
nam tak
né
English
going
goer
buddha; high one of the
goers
Avalokiteśvara
Bodhisattva; lord of the
goers
six classes of goers
great-value goers; human
perfect goers; human
people
the intermediate
circumambulatory path
intermediate state
demon
the vitality; life-power
Tibet
Tibetan people
Bon; chant repeatedly
purification
spin
to go in a circuit;
circumambulation
Indian treatises
empowerment
pure visions
flag pole
ladder of sky
thunderbolt
demon
demoness
the pass of Tara
stooping goer; animal
precious treasure of
mountain; Mount Kailash
brisk mountain; Mount
Kailash
the highest academic
degree in Tibetan
Buddhism and Bon
Elephant Fountain River
continent path
ladder of sky
sacred objects;
sacredness
114
gnas mchog
gnas mjal
né chok
né jel
gnas ri
né ri
gnas skor
né kor
gnas skor ba
né kor ba
gnyan
gu byi mang ske
gzhi bdag
khor ba
nyen
gu ji mang ké
zhi dak
kor wa
khram shing
tram shing
klu
kyang
kyichu
lagngar co
lu
kyang
kyichu
la ang co
langs agro
lha
lhasa
lto agro
lung btsan
ma ja gtsang po
mani
Mani khor loi phan yon
lang adro
la
la sa
to adro
lung tsen
ma ja tsang po
mani
mani kor lo pen yön
mani chos khor
mani chö kor
Mani Kabum
mani lha khang
mapam yumco
mani kabum
mani la kang
mapam yumco
mchong agro
mkhaa agro ma
nang skor
chong adro
kha adro ma
nang kor
nyal agro
om mani padme hum
nyel adro
om ma ni padmé hum
pa
Palden Lhamo
phra men dakinis
phur agro
phyi skor
pa
paden lamo
tra men dakinis
pur adro
chi kor
sacred places
to encounter or meet a
gnas; pilgrimage
mountain where holy
people lived
going around a gnas;
pilgrimage
people who go around a
sacred place; pilgrim
mammal
a Tibetan god
owner of base
wheel of birth and
rebirth;
circumambualtion
the plate used for
catching ghosts
water spirit
Tibetan wild ass
Lhasa River
lake of demons; Lake
Rakshastal
erect goer; human
god
place of the gods; Lhasa
belly goer; snake
prophecies
Peacock River
jewel
The Benefits of the Mani
Wheel
precious dharma wheel;
prayer wheel
Sutra of Mani Kabum
shrine of prayer wheel
undefeatable jade lake;
Lake Manasarrovar
jumping goer; frog
sky-going females; dakini
the inner
circumambulatory path
lying-down goer; worm
adoration to the Jewel in
the Lotus, amen
people
a Tibetan goddess
hybrid dakini, demoness
flying goer; bird
the outer
115
Rin byung
rin jung
rkyal agro
rta mchog gtsang po
rtse skor
kyel adro
ta chok tsang po
tsé kor
sab bzhed
sap zhé
saga dawa
seng ge gtsang po
sgrib
sgrib gnyis
saga dawa
seng gé tsang po
drip
drip nyi
skor ra
kor ra
smud skor
mü kor
srin mo
stod bod
stod skor
sin mo
tö bö
tö kor
thangka
Tise lo rgyus
tangka
tisé lo gyü
tsampa
tulku
vdu gnas
yidam
yul lha
tsampa
tuku
vadu né
yidam
yül la
circumambulatory path
a Tibetan iconographic
compendium
swimming goer; fish
Horse Fountain River
top circumambulatory
path
The Annotated sba
Account
Buddha’s birthday
Lion Fountain River
shadow; stain
embodied psychophysical defilement
to go in a circuit;
circumambulation
low circumambulatory
path
demoness
upper Tibet
up circumambulatory
path
scroll of painting
Pilgrimage guide to
Mount Kailash
main food of Tibetans
reincarnation
gathering places
deity of meditation
territorial god
116
Bibliography
English Sources
Allen, Charles. 1982. A Mountain in Tibet: the Search for Mount Kailas and the Sources of
the Great Rivers of India. London: Andre Deutsch.
Allen, Charles. 2001. The Search for Shangri-La: A Journey into Tibetan History. London:
Abacus.
Badone, Ellen and Roseman, Sharon R. 2004. “Approaches to the Anthropology of
Pilgrimage and Tourism.” in Intersecting Journeys: the Anthropology of Pilgrimage and
Tourism, edited by Ellen Badone and Sharon R. Roseman, pp. 1-23. Chicago: University of
Illinois Press.
Beckwith, Christopher. 1987. The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia: a History of the Struggle
for Great Power among Tibetans, Turks, Arabs, and Chinese during the Early Middle Ages.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bellezza, John Vincent. 1997. Divine Dyads Ancient Civilization in Tibet. Dharamsala:
Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
Bhardwaj, Surinder M. 1997. “Geography and Pilgrimage: A Review.” in Sacred Places,
Sacred Spaces: the Geography of Pilgrimage, edited by Robert H. Stoddard and Alan
Morinis, pp. 1-24. Baton Rouge: Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography and
Anthropology, Louisiana State University.
Bishop, Peter. 2001. “Not Only a Shangri-La: Images of Tibet in Western Literature.” in
Imaging Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin and Heinz
Rather, pp. 201-221. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Blofeld, John. 1992. The Tantric Mysticism of Tibet: A Practical Guide. New York: ArkanaPenguin.
Blondeau, Anne-Marie and Gaytso, Yonten. 2003. “Lhasa, Legend and History.” in Lhasa in
the Seventeenth Century: the Capital of the Dalai Lamas, edited by Françoise Pommaret, pp.
15-38. Leiden: Brill.
Buffetrille, Katia. 1998. “Reflections on Pilgrimages to Sacred Mountains, Lakes and Caves.”
in Pilgrimage in Tibet, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 18-34. Surrey: Curzon Press.
Dagyab Kyabgon Rinpoche. 2001. “Buddhism in the West and the Image of Tibet.” in
Imaging Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin and Heinz
Rather, pp. 379-388. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Eck, Diana L. 1987. “The city as a Sacred Center.” in The City as a Sacred Center: Essays on
Six Asian Contexts, edited by Bardwell Smith and Holly Baker Reynolds, pp.1-11. Leiden:
E.J. Brill.
117
Ekvall, Robert B. 1964. Religious Observances in Tibet: Patterns and Function. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane: the Nature of Religion. New York: Harper
& Brothers.
Eliade, Mircea. 1991. Images and Symbols: Studies in Religious Symbolism. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Evans Pritchard, E. E. 1976. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande, abridged by
Eva Gillies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Evans-Wentz, Walter. 1927. The Tibetan Book of the Dead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Filippis, Jeanne Mascolo de. 2003. “The Western Discovery of Tibet.” in Lhasa in the
Seventeenth Century: the Capital of the Dalai Lamas, edited by Françoise Pommaret, pp. 114. Leiden: Brill.
French, Rebecca Redwood. 2010. Culture Summary: Tibetans. New Haven, Conn: Human
Relations Area Files, online document.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Ethos, World View, and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols,” in The
Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, pp. 126-141. New York: Basic Books.
Gennep, Arnold Van. 1960. The Rites of Passage, translated by Monika B. Vizedom and
Gabrielle L. Caffee. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goldstein, Melvyn C. 1989. A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: the Demise of the
Lamaist State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gyatso, Janet. 1989. “Down With the Demoness: Reflections on a Feminine Ground in Tibet.”
in Feminine ground: essays on women and Tibet, edited by Janice D. Willis. New York:
Snow Lion Publications.
Haarh, Erik. 2003. “Extract from The Yar Lun Dynasty”, translated from Danish by Anne
Burchardi for The History of Tibet, Volume I, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 142-155. London
and New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Original source: Haarh, Erik. 1969. “Danish Summary.” in
The Yar Lun Dynasty: A Study with particular Regard to the Contribution by Myths and
Legends to the History of Ancient Tibet and the Origin and Nature of its Kings, pp. 426-437.
Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
Hansen, Peter H. 2001. “Tibetan Horizon: Tibet and the Cinema in the Early Twentieth
Century.” in Imaging Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry
Dodin and Heinz Rather, pp. 91-110. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Haroun, Nabil A. 2005. Teach Yourself Islam: A Comprehensive Course. Cairo: Dar AnNashr Lijami’at.
Hedin, Sven. 1909. Trans-Himalaya: Discoveries and Adventures in Tibet, Vol. II. London:
Macmillan and Co.
118
Hilton, James. 1933. Lost Horizon. London: Macmillan.
Huber, Toni. 1993. What Is A Mountain: An Ethnohistory of Representation and Ritual at
Pure Crystal Mountain in Tibet, doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury.
Huber, Toni. 1997. “Colonial Archeology, International Missionary Buddhism and the First
Example of Modern Tibetan Literature.” in Bauddhavidyāsudhākarah, Studies in Honour of
Heinz Bechert on the occasion of his 65th Birthday, edited by Petra Kieffer-Pülz and JenesUwe Hartmann. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica.
Huber, Toni. 1997. “Guidebook to Lapchi.” in Religions of Tibet in Practice, edited by
Donald S. Lopez, Jr, pp. 120-134. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Huber, Toni edited. 1999. Sacred Spaces and Powerful Places in Tibetan Culture: a
Collection of Essays. Dharamsala: The Libaray of Tibetan Works and Archives.
Huber, Toni and Tsepak Rigzin. 1999. “A Tibetan Guide for Pilgrimage to Ti-se (Mount
Kailas) and mTsho Ma-pham (Lake Manasarovar).” in Sacred Spaces and Powerful Places in
Tibetan Culture: a Collection of Essays, edited by Toni Huber, pp. 125-153. Dharamsala:
The Libaray of Tibetan Works and Archives.
India International Centre. 2010. Water: Culture, Politics and Management. Noida: Dorling
Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Ingold, Tim. 2008. “Introduction.” in Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot,
edited by Tim Ingold and Jo Lee Vergunst, pp.1-19. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Ingold, Tim. 2011. “Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet,” in Being
Alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description, pp. 33-50. London and New York:
Routledge.
James, William. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: a Study in Human Nature.
London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Johnson, Russell and Moran, Kerry. 1989. The Sacred Mountain of Tibet: on Pilgrimage to
Kailas. Rochester: Park Street Press.
Karmay, Samten G. 1998. The Arrow and the Spindle: Studies in History, Myths, Rituals and
Beliefs in Tibet, Volume 1. Kathmandu: Mandala Publications.
Karmay, Samten G. 2005. The Arrow and the Spindle: Studies in History, Myths, Rituals and
Beliefs in Tibet, Volume 2. Kathmandu: Mandala Publications.
Kværne, Per. 1995. The Bon Religion of Tibet: the Iconography of a Living Tradition. Boston:
Shambahala Publications, Inc.
Kaschewsky, Rudolf. 2001. “The Image of Tibet in the West before the Nineteenth Century.”
in Imaging Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin and
Heinz Rather, pp. 4-20. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
119
Korom, Frank J. 2001. “The Role of Tibet in the New Age Movement.” in Imaging Tibet:
Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin and Heinz Rather, pp. 167182. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Kværne, Per. 2003. “The Study of Bon in the West: Past, Present and Future.” in The History
of Tibet, Volume I, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 473-484. London and New York:
RoutledgeCurzon. Original source: Kværne, Per. 2000. “The Study of Bon in the West: Past,
Present and Future”, in New Horizon in Bon Studies (Bon Studies 2), Semi Ethnographical
Reports 15, edited by Samten G. Karmay and Yasuhiko Nagano, pp. 7-20. Osaka: National
Museum of Ethnology.
Ladner, Lorne edited. 2000. The Wheel of Great Compassion: the Practice of the Prayer
Wheel in Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Lama Anagarika Govinda. 1973. “Figure 6. Tibetan Wheel of Life.” in Foundations of
Tibetan Mysticism. New York: Samuel Weiser.
Lama Anagarika Govinda. 2006. The way of the White Clouds. New York: Overlook Press.
Lang, Andrew. 1897. Modern Mythology. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Larsen, Knud and Sinding-Larsen, Amund. 2001. The Lhasa Atlas: Traditional Tibetan
Architecture and Townscape. London: Serindia Publications.
Lopez, Donald S. 1998. Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
Larson, Paul. 2010. “entry: circumambulation.” in Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion,
edited by David A. Leeming, Kathry Maden and Stanton Marlan, pp. 153. New York:
Spinger.
Loseries-Leick, Andrea. 1998. “On the sacredness of Mount Kailasa in the Indian and
Tibetan Sources.” in Pilgrimage in Tibet, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 143-164. Surrey:
Curzon Press.
MacWilliams, Mark W. 2002. “Virtual Pilgrimages on the Internet.” in Religion, Volume 32,
Issue 4, pp. 315-335.
Makely, Charlene E. 2007. The Violence of Liberation: Gender and Tibetan Buddhist Revival
in Post-Mao China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Marvin, Carolyn. 2013. “Presumptive Space and the Tibetan Struggle for Visibility in Lhasa.”
in International Journal of Communication Vol. 7, pp. 1464-1489.
Mauvieux, Benoit, Reinberg, Alain, and Touitou Yvan. 2014. “The yurt: A mobile home of
nomadic populations dwelling in the Mongolian steppe is still used both as a sun clock and a
calendar.” in Chronobiology International, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 151-156.
120
McKay, Alex. 1998. “Kailas-Manasarovar in ‘Classical’ (Hindu) and Colonial Sources:
Asceticism, Power and Pilgrimage.” in Pilgrimage in Tibet, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 165183. Surrey: Curzon Press.
McKay, Alex. 1998. “Introduction.” in Pilgrimage in Tibet, edited by Alex McKay, pp. 1-17.
Surrey: Curzon Press.
McKay, Alex. 2003. “Introduction.” in The History of Tibet, Volume I, edited by Alex
McKay, pp. 17-43. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Nakamura, Susumu W. 1951. “Pradakshina, A Buddhist Form of Obeisance.” in Semitic and
Oriental Studies: A Volume Presented to William Popper, edited by Walter J. Fischel.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Naquin, Susan and Yü, Chün-fang. 1992. “Introduction: Pilgrimage in China.” in Pilgrims
and Sacred Sites in China, edited by Susan Naquin and Chün-fang Yü, pp. 1-38. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Nyanatiloka, Ven edited. 1980. Buddhist Dictionary: Manual of Buddhist Term and
Doctrines. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Nebesky-Wojkowitz, Réne De. 1996. Oracles and Demons of Tibet: the Cult and
Iconography of the Tibetan Protective Deities. Delhi: Book Faith India.
Pedersen, Poul. 2001. “Tibet, Theosophy, and the Psychologization of Buddhism.” in
Imaging Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin and Heinz
Rather, pp. 151-166. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Powers, John. 1995. Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Snow Lion Publications.
Powers, John and Templeman, David. 2012. “Bon.” in Historical Dictionary of Tibet.
Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
Pranavananda, Swami. 1949. Kailas-Manasarovar. Calcutta: S. P. League Ltd.
Pranavananda, Swami. 1950. Exploration in Tibet. Calcutta: University of Calcutta Press.
Preston, James J. 1992. “Spiritual Magnetism: An Organizing Principle for the Study of
Pilgrimage.” in Sacred Journeys: The Anthropology of Pilgrimage, edited by Alan Morinis,
pp. 31-61. Westport: Greenwood Press
Rakocevic, Milan P. 2013. Holy Mount Kailash: A Pilgrimage in Tibet. Bloomington:
AuthorHouse.
Redfield, Robert and Singer, Milton. 1969. “The Cultural Role of Cities.” in Classic Essays
on the Culture of Cities, edited by Richard Sennett, pp. 206-233. New York: Meredith
Corporation.
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
121
Serway, Raymond A. and Jewett, John W. Jr. 2010. Physics for Scientists and Engineers,
Volume 1, Chapters 1-22. Belmont: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
Shakbpa, W.D. 1967. Tibet: A Political History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shakbpa, W.D. 2010. One Hundred Thousand Moons: an Advanced Political History of Tibet
Volume 1, translated and annotated by Derek F. Maher. Leiden: Brill.
Simpson, William. 1896. The Buddhist Praying-Wheel: A Collection of Material Bearing
upon the Symbolism of the Wheel and Circular movements in Custom and Religion Ritual.
London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
Skilton, Andrew. 1997. A Concise History of Buddhism. Birmingham: Windhorse
Publications.
Snelling, John. 1990. Sacred Mountain: Complete Guide to Tibet’s Mount Kailas. London:
East-West Publications.
Stein, Rolf Alfred. 1972. Tibetan Civilization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stoddard, Heather. 1999. “Dynamic Structures in Buddhist Mandalas: Apradaksina and
Mystic Heat in the Mother Tantra Section of the Anuttarayoga Tantras.” in Artibus Asiae, Vol.
58, No. 3/4, pp. 169-213.
Stoddard, Robert H. 1997. “Defining and Classifying Pilgrimages.” in Sacred Places, Sacred
Spaces: the Geography of Pilgrimage, edited by Robert H. Stoddard and Alan Morinis, pp.
41-60. Baton Rouge: Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography and Anthropology,
Louisiana State University.
Stoddard, Robert H. and Morinis, Alan. 1997. “Introduction.” in Sacred Places, Sacred
Spaces: the Geography of Pilgrimage, edited by Robert H. Stoddard and Alan Morinis, pp.
ix-xi. Baton Rouge: Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography and Anthropology,
Louisiana State University.
Tylor, Edward B. 1920. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology,
Philosophy, Religion Language, Art, and Custom. London: John Murray.
Thubron, Colin. 2011. To a Mountain in Tibet. London: Chatto & Windus.
Turner, Victor and Turner, Edith. 1978. Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture:
Anthropological Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press.
Vergunst, Jo Lee and Ingold, Tim. 2008. “Preface and Acknowledgements.” in Ways of
Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot, edited by Tim Ingold and Jo Lee Vergunst, pp.
xi. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
White, David Gordon. 2000. “Introduction.” in Tantra in Practice, edited by David Gordon
White, pp. 3-38. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
122
Wylie, Turrell. 1966. “A Propos of Tibetan Religious Observances.” in Journal of the
American Oriental Society, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 39-45.
Zhao, Mian etc. 2009. “Mitochondrial Genome Evidence Reveals Successful Late Paleolithic
Settlement on the Tibetan Plateau.” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.
106. No. 50, pp. 21230-21235.
Chinese Sources
Caibei. 2010. “The Study and Analysis of Sacred Geography in Tibet under the Western
Perspective of Pilgrimage.” in China Tibetology, Issue 1, pp. 110-117. 才贝. 2010. “西方’朝
圣’视野 藏族’神圣’地理研究及其分析”, 中国藏学, 2010 年第一期, 110-117.
Chen, Qing Ying. 2008. “On Ideological Foundation of Living Buddha’s Reincarnation.” in
Journal of Tibet Nationalities Institute, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 30-35. 陈庆英. 2008. 论产生活佛
转世的思想基础. 西藏民族学院学报, 2008 年第二十九卷第五期, 30-35.
Deng, Qi Yao. 1999. The Survey of Gu in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Literature and Arts
Press. 邓启耀. 1999. 中国巫蛊考察. 海: 海文艺出版社.
Department of Population and Employment Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. 2010.
China Population Census. Beijing: China Statistics Press. 国家统计局人 和就 统计司.
2010. 中国 2010 年人 普查资料. 京: 中国统计出版社.
Gele. 1988. The Discussion of the Origin of Tibetan Culture and its Relationship with Nearby
Ethnic Groups. Guang Dong: Sun Yat-sen University Press. 格勒. 1988. 论藏族文 起源形
成与周围民族的关系. 广 : 中山大学出版社.
Gele. 2004. “Mapam Yumco: the Mother of Rivers.” in China’s Tibet, Vol. 4, pp. 61-63. 格
勒. 2004. 玛旁雍错: 世界江河之母. 中国西藏, 2004 年第四期, 61-63.
Huang, Ming Xin. 2010. The Buddhism of Tibetan Empire. Beijing: China Tibetology
Publishing House. 黄明信. 2010. 吐蕃佛教. 京: 中国藏学出版社.
Hou, Hui Ming. 2011. “The Mandala in Early Tantrism.” in Studies in World Religions, Vol.
3, pp. 30-41. 侯慧明. 2011. 论密教早期之曼荼罗法. 世界宗教研究. 2011 年第 期, 20-41.
Huang, Zhi Kun edited. 1986. Ancient Hindu Mythology. Changsha: Hunan Juvenile and
Children Books Publishing House. 黄志坤编译. 1986. 印度神话. 长沙: 湖南少年儿童出
版社.
Huo, Wei. 2010. “History about Tibetan Ancient Civilization According to the
Archaeological Discoveries.” in Ethno-National Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 54-67. 霍巍. 2010. 考
学所 西藏文明的历史轨迹. 民族研究, 2010 年第 期 , 54-67.
Liu, Wei. 2008. “The Pantheistic Belief of Tibet.” in China Tibetology, Issue 4, pp. 115-125.
刘 . 2008. 简论西藏的泛神信仰. 中国藏学, 2008 年第四期, 115-125.
123
Lu, Ya Jun translated and annotated. 2001. bkav chems ka khol ma. Lanzhou: Gansu People’s
Publishing House. 卢亚军译注. 2001. 西藏的 世音 (柱间史). 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社.
Norbu, Basang. 1992. “The Cultural Meaning of Reincarnation of Tulku.” in Tibetan Studies,
Vol. 4, pp. 71-79. 巴桑罗布. 1992. 活佛转世
的文 内涵. 西藏研究, 1992 年第四期,
71-79.
Shen, Wei Rong. 2010. Searching for Shangri-La. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
沈卫荣. 2010.寻 香格里拉. 京:中国人民大学出版社
Gyaltsen, Sonam. 2000. The Clear Mirror: a Royal Genealogy translated and annotated by
Liu Li Qian. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House. 索南坚赞著. 刘立千译注. 2010. 西藏王
统记. 京: 民族出版社.
Taylor, Michael. 1999. Mythos Tibet: Entdeckungsreisen von Marco Polo bis Alexandra
David-Neel, Chinese version, translated by Geng Sheng. Beijing: China Tibetology
Publishing House. 米歇尔·泰勒. 1999. 发现西藏. 耿昇译. 京: 中国藏学出版社.
Tsering. 2007. The History of Tibetan Empire. Lanzhou: Gansu People’s Publishing House.
才让. 2007. 吐蕃史稿. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社.
Tsering Thar. 1996. “The worship of Sacred Mountain Gang Tise and its Nearby Cultures.”
in China Tibetology, Vol.1, pp. 67-79. 才让太. “冈底斯神山崇拜及其周边的 代文 ”. 中
国藏学, 1996 年第一期, 67-79.
Tsering Thar. 2006. “Actuality of Bon Religion and its Cultural Amalgamation to the Society”
in Tibetan Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 25-32. 才让太, 2006. 苯教的现状及其与社会的文 融合. 西
藏研究, 2006 年第 期, 25-32.
Tsering Thar. 2008. “Analysis of the Origin of Three-Phase of Bon History.” in China
Tibetology, Vol.4, pp. 61-68. 才让太. 苯教历史 段论之由来及剖析. 中国藏学, 2008 年第
四期, 61-68.
Wang, Sen. 1987. The History of the Development of Tibetan Buddhism. Beijing: China
Social Sciences Press. 王森. 1987. 西藏佛教发展史略. 京: 中国社会科学出版社.
Wang, Xian Jun. 1993. “The Administration of Tsangpa in the End of Ming Dynasty.” in The
Research of Tibetology: a Collection of Essays, edited by the Editing Committee of The
Research of Tibetology, pp. 171-180. Lhasa: Xizang Renmin Press. 王献军. 1993. 明朝末年
西藏的藏巴汗政权. 藏学研究论 第五辑, 藏学研究论 编委会编, 171-180. 拉萨: 西藏
人民出版社.
Xie, Ji Sheng. 1988. “The Myth of Mountain Deities in Tibet and its Characteristics.” in
Tibetan Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 83-97. 谢继胜, 1988. 藏族的山神神话及其特征. 西藏研究,
1988 年第四期, 83-97.
Yang, Sheng Min edited. 2003. Ethnography of China. Beijing: Central University for
Nationalities Press. 杨圣敏主编. 2007. 中国民族志. 京: 中央民族大学出版社.
124
Zhao, Pu Chu. 1993. The Questions and Answers of Buddhism. Beijing: Buddhist Association
of China. 赵朴初. 1993. 佛教常识问答. 京: 中国佛教 会.
Zhang, Hu Sheng. 2006. The Sacred Circumambulation in Lhasa: a Study of the Sacred
Space and Time Living, doctoral dissertation, Beijing Normal University. 张虎生. 2006. 拉萨
转经: 一项对神圣空间和时间生活的研究. 京师范大学博士论文.
Zhang, Jiang Hua. 1989. “Circular Phenomena and its Symbolic Meaning in Tibetan
Buddhism.” in Ethno-National Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 63-74. 张江 . 1989. 圆圈现象及其在藏
佛教中的象征意义. 民族研究, 1989 年第五期 , 63-74.
Zhou, Xue Zhong and Yang, Wen Bi. 2007. “Hajj: Muslims one of Transitional Protocol.” in
Nationalities Research in Qinghai. Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 12-15. 周学忠, 杨文笔. 2007. 朝觐:
穆斯林的一个过渡礼仪. 青海民族研究, 2007 年第十八卷第 期, 12-15.
Internet Sources
Buffetrille, Katia. 2004. The Evolution of a Tibetan Pilgrimage: the Pilgrimage to A myes
rMa chen Mountain in the 21st Century. Retrieved July 15, 2013 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.case.edu/affil/tibet/tibetanNomads/documents/Taiwan_art.dod. Original source:
Buffetrille, Katia. 2004. “The Evolution of a Tibetan Pilgrimage: the Pilgrimage to A myes
rMa chen Mountain in the 21st Century.” in Symposium on Contemporary Tibetan Studies,
21st century Tibet Issue Collected Papers, pp. 325-363. Taipei: Mongolian and Tibetan
Affairs Commission.
Central Tibetan Administration. Tibet at a Glance. Retrieved June 7, 2013, from the World
Wide Web: http://tibet.net/about-tibet/tibet-at-a-glance/
Chinese Government White Paper. 2008. The Preservation and Development of Tibetan
Culture. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/200809/25/content_1107656.htm
“circumambulate.” Merriam Webster Online. Retrieved August 10, 2013, from the World
Wide Web: http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/circumambulate?show=0&t=1376622696
Dirhagama Vol. 20. CBETA Chinese Electronic Tripitaka V1.60. Retrieved November 13,
2013, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cbeta.org/result/normal/T01/0001_020.htm
Figure 2. Buddhist Cosmology. Abhidharma. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from the World Wide
Web: http://abhidharma.ru/A/Samsara/Content/0002.htm
Figure 8. Statue of Jowo Rinpoche. Kagyu Media Lab. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the
World Wide Web: http://www.dharmamedia.org/media/general/dwnld/thanka/buddhas/jowo_jokhang.jpg
Figure 10. Samye Monastery. Tibet China Travel Service. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the
World Wide Web: http://www.toptibettravel.cn/Attractions/shannan/106.html
125
Figure 17. Symbols and Meanings of Wheel of Life. Kafka-metamorphosis. Retrieved July
26, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://kafkametamorphosis.wikispaces.com/Metamorphosis+%26+Samsara
Lama Zopa Rinpoche 1994. Advice on the Benefits of Prayer Wheels. Osel Shen Phen Audio
Archive. Retrieved February 20, 2014, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fpmtosel.org/teachings/wheels.htm
Map 1. The map of Greater Tibet. Website of Central Tibetan Administration. Retrieved June
7, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://xizang-zhiye.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/tibet-map-2.jpg
Map 2. Topography of Xizang. China Tourist Maps. Retrieved June 25, 2013, from the
World Wide Web: http://www.chinatouristmaps.com/china-maps/topography-ofchina/topography-of-xizang.html
Map 3. Nang Skor. Tibetan Heritage Fund. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the World Wide
Web: http://www.tibetheritagefund.org/old_web/menu_main/2_fs_en.html
Map 4. Bar Skor. Tibetan Heritage Fund. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.tibetheritagefund.org/old_web/menu_main/2_fs_en.html
Map 5. Rtze Skor. Tibetan Heritage Fund. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the World Wide
Web: http://www.tibetheritagefund.org/old_web/menu_main/2_fs_en.html
Map 6. Gling Skor. Tibetan Heritage Fund. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from the World Wide
Web: http://www.tibetheritagefund.org/old_web/menu_main/2_fs_en.html
Shambhala Offical Website. Contemplative Arts and Disciplines. Retrieved June 24, 2014,
from the World Wide Web: http://www.shambhala.org/arts.php
The Tibetan & Himalayan Library. THL Online Tibetan Phonetics Converter. Retrieved May
15, 2014, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.thlib.org/reference/transliteration/phconverter.php