Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Madhyamika"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<poem>
 
<poem>
  
[[Madhyamika]] (Skt. [[Mādhyamika]]; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[དབུ་མ་པ་]]}}>, [[umapa]]; [[Wyl.]] [[dbu ma pa]]) — the followers of the [[Middle Way]] [[philosophy]], which teaches freedom from all [[extremes]]. They say that just as truly [[existent]] external [[phenomena]] were refuted by the [[Chittamatra]] school, a truly [[existent]] perceiving [[mind]] must also be refuted, since both are equally lacking in [[inherent]] [[existence]], [[being]] mere [[dependent originations]].
+
[[Madhyamika]] (Skt. [[Mādhyamika]]; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[དབུ་མ་པ་]]}}>, [[umapa]]; [[Wyl.]] [[dbu ma pa]]) — the followers of the [[Middle Way]] [[philosophy]], which teaches freedom from all [[extremes]].  
 +
 
 +
They say that just as truly [[existent]] external [[phenomena]] were refuted by the [[Chittamatra]] school, a truly [[existent]] perceiving [[mind]] must also be refuted, since both are equally lacking in [[inherent]] [[existence]], [[being]] mere [[dependent originations]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The [[Madhyamika]] school originates with [[Nagarjuna]], who commented upon the direct meaning of the [[Prajñaparamita sutras]] in his [[Collection of Reasoning]], which includes the famous [[Root]] [[Verses on the Middle Way]].
 +
 
 +
(skt.: [[madhyamika]]; tib.: [[uma]]) It is a system founded by [[Nagarjuna]] in the second century C.E., based on the [[Prajnaparamita Sutras]] of [[Shakyamuni Buddha]], and considered to be the supreme presentation of the [[wisdom of emptiness]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
This [[view]] holds that all [[phenomena]] are [[empty of self]] existance and that they arise by [[dependant origination]].
 +
 
 +
It is called [[middle way]] because it avoids the two mistaken [[extremes]] (so it is in the middle of these [[two extremes]]):
  
The [[Madhyamika]] school originates with [[Nagarjuna]], who commented upon the direct meaning of the [[Prajñaparamita]] [[sutras]] in his Collection of {{Wiki|Reasoning}}, which includes the famous [[Root]] [[Verses on the Middle Way]].
 
  
(skt.: [[madhyamika]]; tib.: [[uma]]) It is a system founded by [[Nagarjuna]] in the second century C.E., based on the [[Prajnaparamita Sutras]] of [[Shakyamuni Buddha]], and considered to be the supreme presentation of the [[wisdom of emptiness]]. This [[view]] holds that all [[phenomena]] are [[empty of self]] existance and that they arise by [[dependant origination]]. It is called [[middle way]] because it avoids the two mistaken [[extremes]] (so it is in the middle of these [[two extremes]]):
 
  
 
1. [[seeing]] things as [[self]] [[existent]] ({{Wiki|eternalism}})
 
1. [[seeing]] things as [[self]] [[existent]] ({{Wiki|eternalism}})
 +
 
2. [[seeing]] things as non [[existent]] ([[nihilism]])
 
2. [[seeing]] things as non [[existent]] ([[nihilism]])
 +
  
 
[[Madhyamika]] is divided in two schools:
 
[[Madhyamika]] is divided in two schools:
 +
  
 
1. [[Madhyamika Svatantrika]] ([[uma rang gyu pa]]): [[view]] that still holds that things have some kind of [[self]] [[existence]]. This [[view]] is considered as lower than [[Madhyamika Prasangika]].
 
1. [[Madhyamika Svatantrika]] ([[uma rang gyu pa]]): [[view]] that still holds that things have some kind of [[self]] [[existence]]. This [[view]] is considered as lower than [[Madhyamika Prasangika]].
 +
 
2. [[Madhyamika Prasangika]] ([[uma ten gyur pa]]): [[view]] that holds that nothing at all has any kind of [[self]] [[existence]]. This [[view]] is considered supreme.
 
2. [[Madhyamika Prasangika]] ([[uma ten gyur pa]]): [[view]] that holds that nothing at all has any kind of [[self]] [[existence]]. This [[view]] is considered supreme.
 +
  
  
 
Subschools
 
Subschools
 +
  
 
There are two ‘schools’ or streams within the [[Madhyamika]]: the [[Svatantrika]] and the [[Prasangika]].
 
There are two ‘schools’ or streams within the [[Madhyamika]]: the [[Svatantrika]] and the [[Prasangika]].
 +
  
 
These two approaches came about when two [[Indian]] [[masters]] wrote slightly different commentaries to [[Nagarjuna’s]] [[Root Verses]] text.
 
These two approaches came about when two [[Indian]] [[masters]] wrote slightly different commentaries to [[Nagarjuna’s]] [[Root Verses]] text.
  
    [[Buddhapalita]] insisted that the followers of [[Madhyamika]] should not make any {{Wiki|independent}} assertions, but merely show the absurd {{Wiki|consequences}} of [[holding]] to any extreme position. This approach is called [[prasangika]], meaning “consequence”.
 
  
     The other, [[Bhavaviveka]], [[thought]] it was acceptable to use what is called “[[autonomous syllogism]]” ([[svatantra]]). This approach is called [[svatantrika]].
+
 
 +
    [[Buddhapalita]] insisted that the followers of [[Madhyamika]] should not make any {{Wiki|independent}} assertions, but merely show the absurd {{Wiki|consequences}} of [[holding]] to any extreme position.
 +
 
 +
This approach is called [[prasangika]], meaning “consequence”.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
     The other, [[Bhavaviveka]], [[thought]] it was acceptable to use what is called “[[autonomous syllogism]]” ([[svatantra]]).  
 +
 
 +
This approach is called [[svatantrika]].
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
[[Madhyamika]] or [[Madhyamaka]]?
 
[[Madhyamika]] or [[Madhyamaka]]?
  
There has been some disagreement in {{Wiki|Western}} {{Wiki|scholarship}} on the use of the terms [[Madhyamaka]] and [[Madhyamika]]. Great San­skritists such as T. R. V. [[Murti]], a member of the [[Sanskrit]] Commission set up by the [[Indian]] government in 1959, advocated the use of "[[Madhyamika]]" on all occasions. Others use [[Madhyamaka]] for the system and the texts, and [[Madhyamika]] for its advocates.
 
  
[[Mādhyamika]],  ([[Sanskrit]]: “[[Intermediate]]”), important school in the [[Mahāyāna]] (“[[Great Vehicle]]”) [[Buddhist tradition]]. Its [[name]] derives from its having sought a middle position between the {{Wiki|realism}} of the [[Sarvāstivāda]] (“[[Doctrine]] That All Is Real”) school and the {{Wiki|idealism}} of the [[Yogācāra]] (“[[Mind Only]]”) school. The most renowned [[Mādhyamika]] thinker was [[Nāgārjuna]] (2nd century ad), who developed the [[doctrine]] that all is [[void]] ([[śūnyavāda]]). The three authoritative texts of the school are the [[Mādhyamika-śāstra]] ([[Sanskrit]]: “[[Treatise of the Middle Way]]”) and the [[Dvādasá-dvāra-śāstra]] (“[[Twelve Gates Treatise]]”) by [[Nāgārjuna]] and the [[Śataka-śāstra]] (“[[One Hundred Verses Treatise]]”), attributed to his pupil [[Āryadeva]].
+
 
 +
There has been some disagreement in {{Wiki|Western}} {{Wiki|scholarship}} on the use of the terms [[Madhyamaka]] and [[Madhyamika]].
 +
 
 +
Great San­skritists such as T. R. V. [[Murti]], a member of the [[Sanskrit]] Commission set up by the [[Indian]] government in 1959, advocated the use of "[[Madhyamika]]" on all occasions.
 +
 
 +
Others use [[Madhyamaka]] for the system and the texts, and [[Madhyamika]] for its advocates.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Mādhyamika]],  ([[Sanskrit]]: “[[Intermediate]]”), important school in the [[Mahāyāna]] (“[[Great Vehicle]]”) [[Buddhist tradition]].  
 +
 
 +
Its [[name]] derives from its having sought a middle position between the {{Wiki|realism}} of the [[Sarvāstivāda]] (“[[Doctrine That All Is Real]]”) school and the {{Wiki|idealism}} of the [[Yogācāra]] (“[[Mind Only]]”) school.  
 +
 
 +
The most renowned [[Mādhyamika]] thinker was [[Nāgārjuna]] (2nd century ad), who developed the [[doctrine]] that all is [[void]] ([[śūnyavāda]]).  
 +
 
 +
The three authoritative texts of the school are the [[Mādhyamika-śāstra]] ([[Sanskrit]]: “[[Treatise of the Middle Way]]”) and the [[Dvādasá-dvāra-śāstra]] (“[[Twelve Gates Treatise]]”) by [[Nāgārjuna]] and the [[Śataka-śāstra]] (“[[One Hundred Verses Treatise]]”), attributed to his pupil [[Āryadeva]].
 
[[File:Ny.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Ny.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
[[Buddhism]] in general assumed that the [[world]] is a [[cosmic]] flux of momentary interconnected events ([[dharmas]]), however the [[reality]] of these events might be viewed. [[Nāgārjuna]] sought to demonstrate that the flux itself could not be held to be real, nor could the [[consciousness]] perceiving it, as it itself is part of this flux. If this [[world]] of [[constant]] change is not real, neither can the serial [[transmigration]] be real, nor its opposite, [[nirvana]]. [[Transmigration]] and [[nirvana]] [[being]] equally unreal, they are one and the same. In the final analysis, [[reality]] can only be attributed to something entirely different from all that is known, which must therefore have no identifiable predicates and can only be styled the [[void]] ([[sunyata]]).
 
  
[[Mādhyamika]] thinkers thus strongly {{Wiki|emphasize}} the mutations of [[human]] [[consciousness]] to [[grasp]] the [[reality]] of that which is [[ultimately real]] beyond any [[duality]]. The [[world]] of [[duality]] could be assigned a {{Wiki|practical}} [[reality]] of [[vyavahāra]] (“{{Wiki|discourse}} and process”), but, once the [[ultimate]] meaning ([[paramārtha]]) of the [[void]] is grasped, this [[reality]] falls away. These ideals influenced [[Hindu]] thinkers, principally [[Gauḍapāda]] (7th century) and [[Śaṅkara]] (usually dated ad 788–820); the [[latter]] is therefore called a crypto-[[Mādhyamika]] by his adversaries.
 
  
The basic [[Mādhyamika]] texts were translated into {{Wiki|Chinese}} by [[Kumārajiva]] in the 5th century, and the teachings were further systematized (as the [[San-lun]], or [[Three Treatises]], school) in the 6th–7th century by [[Chi-tsang]]. The school spread to [[Korea]] and was first transmitted to [[Japan]], as [[Sanron]], in 625 by the [[Korean]] [[monk]] [[Ekwan]].
+
[[Buddhism]] in general assumed that the [[world]] is a [[cosmic]] flux of momentary interconnected events ([[dharmas]]), however the [[reality]] of these events might be viewed.
 +
 
 +
[[Nāgārjuna]] sought to demonstrate that the flux itself could not be held to be real, nor could the [[consciousness]] perceiving it, as it itself is part of this flux.
 +
 
 +
If this [[world]] of [[constant]] change is not real, neither can the serial [[transmigration]] be real, nor its opposite, [[nirvana]].
 +
 
 +
[[Transmigration]] and [[nirvana]] [[being]] equally unreal, they are one and the same.
 +
 
 +
In the final analysis, [[reality]] can only be attributed to something entirely different from all that is known, which must therefore have no identifiable predicates and can only be styled the [[void]] ([[sunyata]]).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Mādhyamika]] thinkers thus strongly {{Wiki|emphasize}} the mutations of [[human]] [[consciousness]] to [[grasp]] the [[reality]] of that which is [[ultimately real]] beyond any [[duality]].
 +
 
 +
The [[world]] of [[duality]] could be assigned a {{Wiki|practical}} [[reality]] of [[vyavahāra]] (“{{Wiki|discourse}} and process”), but, once the [[ultimate]] meaning ([[paramārtha]]) of the [[void]] is grasped, this [[reality]] falls away.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
These ideals influenced [[Hindu]] thinkers, principally [[Gauḍapāda]] (7th century) and [[Śaṅkara]] (usually dated ad 788–820); the [[latter]] is therefore called a crypto-[[Mādhyamika]] by his adversaries.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The basic [[Mādhyamika]] texts were translated into {{Wiki|Chinese}} by [[Kumārajiva]] in the 5th century, and the teachings were further systematized (as the [[San-lun]], or [[Three Treatises]], school) in the 6th–7th century by [[Chi-tsang]].  
 +
 
 +
The school spread to [[Korea]] and was first transmitted to [[Japan]], as [[Sanron]], in 625 by the [[Korean]] [[monk]] [[Ekwan]].
 
</poem>
 
</poem>
 
{{R}}
 
{{R}}

Revision as of 10:28, 18 March 2015

Refin.jpg


Madhyamika (Skt. Mādhyamika; Tib. དབུ་མ་པ་>, umapa; Wyl. dbu ma pa) — the followers of the Middle Way philosophy, which teaches freedom from all extremes.

They say that just as truly existent external phenomena were refuted by the Chittamatra school, a truly existent perceiving mind must also be refuted, since both are equally lacking in inherent existence, being mere dependent originations.


The Madhyamika school originates with Nagarjuna, who commented upon the direct meaning of the Prajñaparamita sutras in his Collection of Reasoning, which includes the famous Root Verses on the Middle Way.

(skt.: madhyamika; tib.: uma) It is a system founded by Nagarjuna in the second century C.E., based on the Prajnaparamita Sutras of Shakyamuni Buddha, and considered to be the supreme presentation of the wisdom of emptiness.


This view holds that all phenomena are empty of self existance and that they arise by dependant origination.

It is called middle way because it avoids the two mistaken extremes (so it is in the middle of these two extremes):



1. seeing things as self existent (eternalism)

2. seeing things as non existent (nihilism)


Madhyamika is divided in two schools:


1. Madhyamika Svatantrika (uma rang gyu pa): view that still holds that things have some kind of self existence. This view is considered as lower than Madhyamika Prasangika.

2. Madhyamika Prasangika (uma ten gyur pa): view that holds that nothing at all has any kind of self existence. This view is considered supreme.



Subschools


There are two ‘schools’ or streams within the Madhyamika: the Svatantrika and the Prasangika.


These two approaches came about when two Indian masters wrote slightly different commentaries to Nagarjuna’s Root Verses text.



    Buddhapalita insisted that the followers of Madhyamika should not make any independent assertions, but merely show the absurd consequences of holding to any extreme position.

This approach is called prasangika, meaning “consequence”.


    The other, Bhavaviveka, thought it was acceptable to use what is called “autonomous syllogism” (svatantra).

This approach is called svatantrika.



Madhyamika or Madhyamaka?



There has been some disagreement in Western scholarship on the use of the terms Madhyamaka and Madhyamika.

Great San­skritists such as T. R. V. Murti, a member of the Sanskrit Commission set up by the Indian government in 1959, advocated the use of "Madhyamika" on all occasions.

Others use Madhyamaka for the system and the texts, and Madhyamika for its advocates.




Mādhyamika, (Sanskrit: “Intermediate”), important school in the Mahāyāna (“Great Vehicle”) Buddhist tradition.

Its name derives from its having sought a middle position between the realism of the Sarvāstivāda (“Doctrine That All Is Real”) school and the idealism of the Yogācāra (“Mind Only”) school.

The most renowned Mādhyamika thinker was Nāgārjuna (2nd century ad), who developed the doctrine that all is void (śūnyavāda).

The three authoritative texts of the school are the Mādhyamika-śāstra (Sanskrit: “Treatise of the Middle Way”) and the Dvādasá-dvāra-śāstra (“Twelve Gates Treatise”) by Nāgārjuna and the Śataka-śāstra (“One Hundred Verses Treatise”), attributed to his pupil Āryadeva.

Ny.jpg



Buddhism in general assumed that the world is a cosmic flux of momentary interconnected events (dharmas), however the reality of these events might be viewed.

Nāgārjuna sought to demonstrate that the flux itself could not be held to be real, nor could the consciousness perceiving it, as it itself is part of this flux.

If this world of constant change is not real, neither can the serial transmigration be real, nor its opposite, nirvana.

Transmigration and nirvana being equally unreal, they are one and the same.

In the final analysis, reality can only be attributed to something entirely different from all that is known, which must therefore have no identifiable predicates and can only be styled the void (sunyata).




Mādhyamika thinkers thus strongly emphasize the mutations of human consciousness to grasp the reality of that which is ultimately real beyond any duality.

The world of duality could be assigned a practical reality of vyavahāra (“discourse and process”), but, once the ultimate meaning (paramārtha) of the void is grasped, this reality falls away.


These ideals influenced Hindu thinkers, principally Gauḍapāda (7th century) and Śaṅkara (usually dated ad 788–820); the latter is therefore called a crypto-Mādhyamika by his adversaries.



The basic Mādhyamika texts were translated into Chinese by Kumārajiva in the 5th century, and the teachings were further systematized (as the San-lun, or Three Treatises, school) in the 6th–7th century by Chi-tsang.

The school spread to Korea and was first transmitted to Japan, as Sanron, in 625 by the Korean monk Ekwan.

Source

www.rigpawiki.org