Difference between revisions of "Buddhapalita"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[Buddhapalita]] | + | [[File:Buddhapalita0.JPG|thumb|250px|'''Buddhapalita''']] |
| − | + | '''[[Buddhapalita]]''' (Skt. ''[[Buddhapālita]]''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[སངས་རྒྱས་བསྐྱངས་]]}}, ''[[Sangyé Kyang]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[sangs rgyas bskyangs]]'') - the great [[Indian]] [[scholar]] who is [[acknowledged]] as the [[founder of the Prasangika Madhyamika]]. He composed a commentary to [[Nagarjuna]]'s ''[[Mulamadhyamaka-karika]]'', known simply as the ''[[Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti]]'', or the [['Buddhapalita]]' commentary. | |
| − | + | ==Further Reading== | |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{Nolinking|*David Seyfort Ruegg, ''The Literature of the [[Madhyamaka School]] of Philosophy in India'', Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1981 | ||
| + | *[[Lobsang N. Tsonawa]], ''[[Indian Buddhist Pandits]] from The [[Jewel Garland of Buddhist History]]'', [[Dharamsala]]: [[Library of Tibetan Works and Archives]], 1985.}} | ||
| + | {{RigpaWiki}} | ||
| + | {{NewSourceBreak}} | ||
| + | [[Buddhapalita]] [[仏護]] (c. 470–540) (Skt; Jpn [[Butsugo]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The founder of the [[Prasangika school]] of [[Madhyamika]] [[philosophy]] in [[India]]. In the sixth century, [[Buddhapalita]] and his contemporary, [[Bhavaviveka]], wrote commentaries on [[Nagarjuna's]] [[Verses on the Middle Way]] (Skt [[Madhyamaka-karika]] ). Differences in their approach and explanation of the [[truth]] of [[nonsubstantiality]] resulted in the [[division]] of the [[Madhyamika school]] into the [[Prasangika school]] led by [[Buddhapalita]] and the [[Svatantrika school]] led by [[Bhavaviveka]]. The [[Prasangika school]] was continued by [[Chandrakirti]]. The [[Sanskrit]] original of [[Buddhapalita's]] commentary on [[Verses on the Middle Way]] is not extant, but a [[Tibetan]] translation [[exists]]. | ||
See also; [[Bhavaviveka]]. | See also; [[Bhavaviveka]]. | ||
| + | {{R}} | ||
| + | [http://www.sgilibrary.org/search_dict.php?id=227 sgilibrary.org] | ||
| + | {{NewSourceBreak}} | ||
| − | [[Buddhapālita]] (470–550) was a commentator on the works of [[Nāgārjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]]. His works were mildly criticised by his contemporary [[Bhavyaviveka]], and then he was vigorously defended by the later [[Candrakīrti]], whose terms differentiating the two [[scholars]] led to the rise of the [[Prasaṅgika]] and [[Svatantrika]] schools of [[Madhyamaka]]. In this [[sense]], [[Buddhapālita]] can be said to have been the founder of the [[Prasaṅgika | + | [[Buddhapālita]] (470–550) was a commentator on the works of [[Nāgārjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]]. His works were mildly criticised by his contemporary [[Bhavyaviveka]], and then he was vigorously defended by the later [[Candrakīrti]], whose terms differentiating the two [[scholars]] led to the rise of the [[Prasaṅgika]] and [[Svatantrika]] schools of [[Madhyamaka]]. In this [[sense]], [[Buddhapālita]] can be said to have been the founder of the [[Prasaṅgika Madhyamaka]] School. |
| − | [[Buddhapalita]] was a [[great master]] and exponent of the [[Prasangika]] system of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhism]]. It is said that he was born in Hamsakrida, {{Wiki|South India}} and from an early age took a deep [[interest]] in the [[teaching]] of the [[Buddha]]. He received [[novice]] and full [[ordination]] and entered [[Nalanda monastery]] where he studied under [[acharya]] [[Sangharaksita]], himself a [[disciple]] of [[Nagamitra]]. [[Buddhapalita]] quickly mastered the teachings of [[arya]] [[Nagarjuna]] and later while resident at [[Dantapuri]] [[monastery]] in {{Wiki|South India}} he composed many commentaries to the works of [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]]. | + | [[Buddhapalita]] was a [[great master]] and exponent of the [[Prasangika]] system of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhism]]. It is said that he was born in [[Hamsakrida]], {{Wiki|South India}} and from an early age took a deep [[interest]] in the [[teaching]] of the [[Buddha]]. He received [[novice]] and full [[ordination]] and entered [[Nalanda monastery]] where he studied under [[acharya]] [[Sangharaksita]], himself a [[disciple]] of [[Nagamitra]]. [[Buddhapalita]] quickly mastered the teachings of [[arya]] [[Nagarjuna]] and later while resident at [[Dantapuri]] [[monastery]] in {{Wiki|South India}} he composed many commentaries to the works of [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]]. |
| − | In the sixth Century CE [[Buddhapalita]] composed his famous commentary to [[Nagarjuna]]’s | + | In the sixth Century CE [[Buddhapalita]] composed his famous commentary to [[Nagarjuna]]’s [[Fundamental Wisdom]] ([[Mulasastra]]) called [[Buddhapalitavrtti]], a work of great clarity and [[insight]]. As a true [[Prasangika]] treatise it extensively employed {{Wiki|consequences}} to elaborate [[Madhyamaka]] [[view]]. His younger contemporary [[Bhavaviveka]] also composed a commentary to [[Nagarjuna]]’s work called [[Lamp of Wisdom]] ([[Prajñapradipa]]) in which he criticized [[Buddhapalita]]’s position. |
| − | It is the way that [[Bhavaviveka]] criticizes [[Buddhapalita]] that belies [[Bhavaviveka]]'s [[belief]] in autonomous [[inference]] ([[svatantranumana]]; [[rang rgyud rjes dpag]]). [[Bhavaviveka]] asserted that stating consequences was insufficient. To generate a valid {{Wiki|conception}} of [[emptiness]], one must state autonomously established {{Wiki|syllogisms}}. [[Candrakirti]] (Seventh Century CE) a great exponent of [[Madhyamaka]] and [[abbot | + | It is the way that [[Bhavaviveka]] criticizes [[Buddhapalita]] that belies [[Bhavaviveka]]'s [[belief]] in autonomous [[inference]] ([[svatantranumana]]; [[rang rgyud rjes dpag]]). [[Bhavaviveka]] asserted that stating {{Wiki|consequences}} was insufficient. To generate a valid {{Wiki|conception}} of [[emptiness]], one must [[state]] autonomously established {{Wiki|syllogisms}}. [[Candrakirti]] (Seventh Century CE) a great exponent of [[Madhyamaka]] and [[abbot of Nalanda]], composed the treatise called [[Clear Words]] ([[Prasannpada]]) as a commentary to the [[Fundamental Wisdom]] based on [[Buddhapalita]]’s work. In his work [[Candrakirti]] defends [[Buddhapalita]]’s position and refutes [[Bhavaviveka]]’s [[assertion]] of autonomous [[syllogisms]]. |
| − | Since [[Bhavaviveka]] was the first [[person]] to clearly distinguish the [[Svatantrika]] [[view]] from the [[Prasangika]] [[view]] he is regarded as the founder of the [[Svatantrika]] system. Similarly since [[Candrakirti]] was the first [[person]] to clearly distinguish [[Prasañgika]] [[view]] from the [[Svatantrika]] he is regarded by [[Tibetan]] [[scholars]] as the founder or [[path]] breaker (shing rta rsol | + | Since [[Bhavaviveka]] was the first [[person]] to clearly distinguish the [[Svatantrika]] [[view]] from the [[Prasangika]] [[view]] he is regarded as the founder of the [[Svatantrika]] system. Similarly since [[Candrakirti]] was the first [[person]] to clearly distinguish [[Prasañgika]] [[view]] from the [[Svatantrika]] he is regarded by [[Tibetan]] [[scholars]] as the founder or [[path]] breaker ([[shing rta rsol [byed]]) of the [[Prasangika]] system. But [[Tibetans]] [[recognize]] that [[Candrakirti]]’s explanation arises within the {{Wiki|commentarial}} [[lineage]] of [[Buddhapalita]], and for that [[reason] |
| + | ] some assert [[Buddhapalita]] to be the founder of [[Prasangika]]. In {{Wiki|general}} though [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Buddhapalita]] clearly [[taught]] the [[Prasangika]] [[view]] neither is regarded as the founder of the [[Prasangika]] system because historically they did not clearly set forth this [[view]] in contradistinction to the [[Svatantrika]] [[view]]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{W}} | {{W}} | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Buddhapālita]] | [[Category:Buddhapālita]] | ||
[[Category:Prasaṅgika]] | [[Category:Prasaṅgika]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Historical Masters]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Indian Masters]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Seventeen Nalanda Masters]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Madhyamaka]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:33, 6 April 2015
Buddhapalita (Skt. Buddhapālita; Tib. སངས་རྒྱས་བསྐྱངས་, Sangyé Kyang; Wyl. sangs rgyas bskyangs) - the great Indian scholar who is acknowledged as the founder of the Prasangika Madhyamika. He composed a commentary to Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamaka-karika, known simply as the Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti, or the 'Buddhapalita' commentary.
Further Reading
- David Seyfort Ruegg, The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1981
- Lobsang N. Tsonawa, Indian Buddhist Pandits from The Jewel Garland of Buddhist History, Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1985.
Source
Buddhapalita 仏護 (c. 470–540) (Skt; Jpn Butsugo)
The founder of the Prasangika school of Madhyamika philosophy in India. In the sixth century, Buddhapalita and his contemporary, Bhavaviveka, wrote commentaries on Nagarjuna's Verses on the Middle Way (Skt Madhyamaka-karika ). Differences in their approach and explanation of the truth of nonsubstantiality resulted in the division of the Madhyamika school into the Prasangika school led by Buddhapalita and the Svatantrika school led by Bhavaviveka. The Prasangika school was continued by Chandrakirti. The Sanskrit original of Buddhapalita's commentary on Verses on the Middle Way is not extant, but a Tibetan translation exists.
See also; Bhavaviveka.
Source
Buddhapālita (470–550) was a commentator on the works of Nāgārjuna and Aryadeva. His works were mildly criticised by his contemporary Bhavyaviveka, and then he was vigorously defended by the later Candrakīrti, whose terms differentiating the two scholars led to the rise of the Prasaṅgika and Svatantrika schools of Madhyamaka. In this sense, Buddhapālita can be said to have been the founder of the Prasaṅgika Madhyamaka School.
Buddhapalita was a great master and exponent of the Prasangika system of Mahayana Buddhism. It is said that he was born in Hamsakrida, South India and from an early age took a deep interest in the teaching of the Buddha. He received novice and full ordination and entered Nalanda monastery where he studied under acharya Sangharaksita, himself a disciple of Nagamitra. Buddhapalita quickly mastered the teachings of arya Nagarjuna and later while resident at Dantapuri monastery in South India he composed many commentaries to the works of Nagarjuna and Aryadeva.
In the sixth Century CE Buddhapalita composed his famous commentary to Nagarjuna’s Fundamental Wisdom (Mulasastra) called Buddhapalitavrtti, a work of great clarity and insight. As a true Prasangika treatise it extensively employed consequences to elaborate Madhyamaka view. His younger contemporary Bhavaviveka also composed a commentary to Nagarjuna’s work called Lamp of Wisdom (Prajñapradipa) in which he criticized Buddhapalita’s position.
It is the way that Bhavaviveka criticizes Buddhapalita that belies Bhavaviveka's belief in autonomous inference (svatantranumana; rang rgyud rjes dpag). Bhavaviveka asserted that stating consequences was insufficient. To generate a valid conception of emptiness, one must state autonomously established syllogisms. Candrakirti (Seventh Century CE) a great exponent of Madhyamaka and abbot of Nalanda, composed the treatise called Clear Words (Prasannpada) as a commentary to the Fundamental Wisdom based on Buddhapalita’s work. In his work Candrakirti defends Buddhapalita’s position and refutes Bhavaviveka’s assertion of autonomous syllogisms.
Since Bhavaviveka was the first person to clearly distinguish the Svatantrika view from the Prasangika view he is regarded as the founder of the Svatantrika system. Similarly since Candrakirti was the first person to clearly distinguish Prasañgika view from the Svatantrika he is regarded by Tibetan scholars as the founder or path breaker ([[shing rta rsol [byed]]) of the Prasangika system. But Tibetans recognize that Candrakirti’s explanation arises within the commentarial lineage of Buddhapalita, and for that [[reason] ] some assert Buddhapalita to be the founder of Prasangika. In general though Nagarjuna and Buddhapalita clearly taught the Prasangika view neither is regarded as the founder of the Prasangika system because historically they did not clearly set forth this view in contradistinction to the Svatantrika view.
