Difference between revisions of "Ego After Realization, Precepts, Teachers"
m (Text replacement - "end" to "end") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DisplayImages|4373|3184|3794|4514|1426|3102|2714|4089|1244|3912|3702|3840|2344|2184|1015}} | {{DisplayImages|4373|3184|3794|4514|1426|3102|2714|4089|1244|3912|3702|3840|2344|2184|1015}} | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Stuffs [[Red]] [[Turtle]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 | July 8 | ||
+ | |||
Would someone who has [[realized]] [[anatta]] still behave in an egoic way? | Would someone who has [[realized]] [[anatta]] still behave in an egoic way? | ||
Line 8: | Line 15: | ||
Such as affairs {{Wiki|drug addiction}}, needless egoic arguing etc? | Such as affairs {{Wiki|drug addiction}}, needless egoic arguing etc? | ||
LikeLike · | LikeLike · | ||
+ | |||
Joel Agee, Viorica Doina Neacsu, Eezy Isempty and 3 others like this. | Joel Agee, Viorica Doina Neacsu, Eezy Isempty and 3 others like this. | ||
Stuffs RedTurtle My [[understanding]] is no, but some others say yes, so I just wanted [[thoughts]] | Stuffs RedTurtle My [[understanding]] is no, but some others say yes, so I just wanted [[thoughts]] | ||
July 8 at 2:40am · Like · 1 | July 8 at 2:40am · Like · 1 | ||
− | Wei Yu According to the [[suttas]], someone who has [[realized]] [[anatta]] directly, [[perceived]] the [[nature]] of [[dharma]] and became a [[stream enterer]], such a [[person]] would be incapable of indulging in [[unwholesome]] ways that could land himself into the [[lower realms]], his [[virtues]] would be great, and even if he/she were to make a slight mistake they will realize it and make ammends. In other words, no, according to [[suttas]] it is impossible for someone who is truly [[awakened]] to be a {{Wiki|drug}} addict. However does a [[stream enterer]] still have [[ego]]? Possibly yes - there is still some trace of the [[sense]] of [[self]], even though a [[stream enterer]] has totally removed the [[view]] or [[belief]] in a [[self]] due to his/her direct [[insight]] into [[anatta]], nonetheless the trace of [[self]] is {{Wiki|present}}, and only the [[arahant]] has fully removed the [[conceit]] of 'I Am'. | + | |
+ | |||
+ | Wei Yu According to the [[suttas]], someone who has [[realized]] [[anatta]] directly, [[perceived]] the [[nature]] of [[dharma]] and became a [[stream enterer]], such a [[person]] would be incapable of indulging in [[unwholesome]] ways that could land himself into the [[lower realms]], his [[virtues]] would be great, and even if he/she were to make a slight mistake they will realize it and make ammends. In other words, no, according to [[suttas]] it is impossible for someone who is truly [[awakened]] to be a {{Wiki|drug}} addict. However does a | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[stream enterer]] still have [[ego]]? Possibly yes - there is still some trace of the [[sense]] of [[self]], even though a [[stream enterer]] has totally removed the [[view]] or [[belief]] in a [[self]] due to his/her direct [[insight]] into [[anatta]], nonetheless the trace of [[self]] is {{Wiki|present}}, and only the [[arahant]] has fully removed the [[conceit]] of 'I Am'. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 2:59am · Like · 8 | July 8 at 2:59am · Like · 8 | ||
Justin Chapweske Of course you can behave in an egoic way. I do it all the [[time]]. | Justin Chapweske Of course you can behave in an egoic way. I do it all the [[time]]. | ||
Line 18: | Line 32: | ||
Wei Yu Hahaha.. well at least you're honest | Wei Yu Hahaha.. well at least you're honest | ||
July 8 at 3:36am · Like · 3 | July 8 at 3:36am · Like · 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Stuffs RedTurtle Well, why I was wondering this is because some say that the [[habits]] that are due to [[karmic conditioning]] would still be active even though the [[ego]] has been seen through, [[ego]] being [[sense]] of [[self]]. What Soh posted makes [[sense]] to me, because if there is no longer a [[sense]] of [[subject]] it would seem that these [[conditions]] would at the very least be severely reduced or at least immediately [[recognized]] for what they are, | Stuffs RedTurtle Well, why I was wondering this is because some say that the [[habits]] that are due to [[karmic conditioning]] would still be active even though the [[ego]] has been seen through, [[ego]] being [[sense]] of [[self]]. What Soh posted makes [[sense]] to me, because if there is no longer a [[sense]] of [[subject]] it would seem that these [[conditions]] would at the very least be severely reduced or at least immediately [[recognized]] for what they are, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Like [[anger]] as a defense if [[self]]: no [[subject]] no {{Wiki|projected}} [[anger]] because there would be nothing to defend | Like [[anger]] as a defense if [[self]]: no [[subject]] no {{Wiki|projected}} [[anger]] because there would be nothing to defend | ||
No [[arrogance]] because [[arrogance]] due to [[pride]], which stems from heavy defense of [[self]] | No [[arrogance]] because [[arrogance]] due to [[pride]], which stems from heavy defense of [[self]] | ||
Line 29: | Line 47: | ||
IME, there's the [[conscious]] [[realization]] of [[view]], but [[embodied]] [[habits]] rooted in separation can continue indefinitely. It seems to me that the depth and clarity of [[anatta]] [[insight]] has a lot to do with how much [[karma]] gets washed away. | IME, there's the [[conscious]] [[realization]] of [[view]], but [[embodied]] [[habits]] rooted in separation can continue indefinitely. It seems to me that the depth and clarity of [[anatta]] [[insight]] has a lot to do with how much [[karma]] gets washed away. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 4:21am · Like · 4 | July 8 at 4:21am · Like · 4 | ||
Albert Hong Its like walking around. So many things can seduce you. | Albert Hong Its like walking around. So many things can seduce you. | ||
Line 34: | Line 54: | ||
You can play. But you sure as [[hell]] know its not a [[worthy]] [[refuge]]. | You can play. But you sure as [[hell]] know its not a [[worthy]] [[refuge]]. | ||
July 8 at 4:45am · Like · 1 | July 8 at 4:45am · Like · 1 | ||
− | Brian Zey (Totally off topic, but Lindsay Funk I [[love]] your "Smooth Canadian" pic.) | + | Brian Zey (Totally off topic, but Lindsay Funk I [[love]] your "Smooth [[Canadian]]" pic.) |
sorry for the interuption. | sorry for the interuption. | ||
July 8 at 4:56am · Like · 3 | July 8 at 4:56am · Like · 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Stuffs RedTurtle Another [[reason]] I ask is because my focus right now other than being [[mindful]] in the {{Wiki|present}} is changing my [[perceptions]] so shitty [[thoughts]] don't fill my head and lead me astray. I'm very prone to negative outlook, and it struck me that this is due to [[selfishness]] and ungratefulness. So I [[thought]] to, if I am going to be content and reduce coveting, I should be greatful for what's in front of me, so when I am attending to remaining {{Wiki|present}} I won't be overwhelmed by [[thoughts]] of {{Wiki|future}} or {{Wiki|past}}, wanting or not wanting, but then someone ( not in my [[sangha]]) informed me this will only reinforce [[sense]] of [[self]], but I am wondering if that is actually the case. | Stuffs RedTurtle Another [[reason]] I ask is because my focus right now other than being [[mindful]] in the {{Wiki|present}} is changing my [[perceptions]] so shitty [[thoughts]] don't fill my head and lead me astray. I'm very prone to negative outlook, and it struck me that this is due to [[selfishness]] and ungratefulness. So I [[thought]] to, if I am going to be content and reduce coveting, I should be greatful for what's in front of me, so when I am attending to remaining {{Wiki|present}} I won't be overwhelmed by [[thoughts]] of {{Wiki|future}} or {{Wiki|past}}, wanting or not wanting, but then someone ( not in my [[sangha]]) informed me this will only reinforce [[sense]] of [[self]], but I am wondering if that is actually the case. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 4:56am · Like | July 8 at 4:56am · Like | ||
Wei Yu What you said {{Wiki|sounds}} good, not sure why someone might say it will reinforce [[sense]] of [[self]]? | Wei Yu What you said {{Wiki|sounds}} good, not sure why someone might say it will reinforce [[sense]] of [[self]]? | ||
[[Thusness]] told me two weeks ago: "We think too much of ourselves, "I" being central and the all. So we cannot know how [[fortunate]] we r to b just "here" even at this moment...the [[infinite]] ?? ([[causes and conditions]]) that r involved. Be grateful and reverent for all these, we will b [[happier]]." | [[Thusness]] told me two weeks ago: "We think too much of ourselves, "I" being central and the all. So we cannot know how [[fortunate]] we r to b just "here" even at this moment...the [[infinite]] ?? ([[causes and conditions]]) that r involved. Be grateful and reverent for all these, we will b [[happier]]." | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 5:08am · Like · 5 | July 8 at 5:08am · Like · 5 | ||
Stuffs RedTurtle Oh cool | Stuffs RedTurtle Oh cool | ||
Line 47: | Line 74: | ||
But to me that doesn't get at the underlying [[causes]] for [[selfish]] {{Wiki|behavior}}, [[thinking]], if these things aren't addressed. | But to me that doesn't get at the underlying [[causes]] for [[selfish]] {{Wiki|behavior}}, [[thinking]], if these things aren't addressed. | ||
July 8 at 5:09am · Edited · Like | July 8 at 5:09am · Edited · Like | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Stuffs RedTurtle Ha ha ha. That sucks but I can see how listening to [[music]] might create more [[karma]] [[thoughts]], [[memories]], rumination lol | Stuffs RedTurtle Ha ha ha. That sucks but I can see how listening to [[music]] might create more [[karma]] [[thoughts]], [[memories]], rumination lol | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 5:19am · Like | July 8 at 5:19am · Like | ||
− | Robert Dominik [[Drugs]], arguments, {{Wiki|sex}}, [[music]], good [[food]], [[dancing]], movies... | + | [[Robert Dominik]] [[Drugs]], arguments, {{Wiki|sex}}, [[music]], good [[food]], [[dancing]], movies... |
July 8 at 5:21am · Edited · Like | July 8 at 5:21am · Edited · Like | ||
Stuffs RedTurtle Also [[interesting]] to see the [[emotions]] and [[sense]] of [[self]] that come up during certain songs: | Stuffs RedTurtle Also [[interesting]] to see the [[emotions]] and [[sense]] of [[self]] that come up during certain songs: | ||
Like when I listen to [[book]] of black earths first album | Like when I listen to [[book]] of black earths first album | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Oddly, [[pride]] [[enjoyment]] and apparently a great [[enjoyment]] in songs about {{Wiki|ancient}} {{Wiki|demons}} letting loose on [[humanity]] | Oddly, [[pride]] [[enjoyment]] and apparently a great [[enjoyment]] in songs about {{Wiki|ancient}} {{Wiki|demons}} letting loose on [[humanity]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Before I [[thought]] I really just liked metal | Before I [[thought]] I really just liked metal | ||
July 8 at 5:23am · Like | July 8 at 5:23am · Like | ||
Stuffs RedTurtle ( those two referring to post that has disappeared) ^^ | Stuffs RedTurtle ( those two referring to post that has disappeared) ^^ | ||
July 8 at 5:23am · Like | July 8 at 5:23am · Like | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | A [[stream entrant]] is said by [[Buddha]] to have 'unbroken [[virtue]]', and cannot engage in [[deeds]] as to result in [[rebirth]] in [[lower realms]], such a [[person]] has cut off the [[roots]] of lower [[realm]] and can only be [[reborn]] as a [[human]] or [[deva]]. Even if minor mistakes are made, they are recognised, confessed, and ammendments are made. | + | Wei Yu There are some [[relative]] differences though. For example, the [[Buddha]] have said that [[intoxicants]] (which [[causes]] heedlessness) taken regularly and habitually results in [[rebirth]] in [[hell]], or even if [[reborn]] as [[human]] one will [[suffer]] [[insanity]]. {{Wiki|Sex}} -- [[Buddha]] has not said that an appropriate {{Wiki|sexual}} [[activity]] between spouses would result in |
+ | |||
+ | [[unwholesome]] [[karmas]] that lead to [[rebirth]] in [[lower realms]], on the other hand, it would certainly be the case that if someone engages in {{Wiki|sexual}} misconducts, that could result in [[rebirth]] in [[lower realms]]. Also, for example, listening to [[music]] and eating good [[food]] are not necessarily [[unwholesome]] [[deeds]] that result in [[rebirth]] in [[lower realms]]. However if listening to | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[music]] somehow incites [[hatred]], that would be [[unwholesome]] [[karma]]. 'Arguments' however could often end up in one of the four [[unwholesome]] speeches, so one must be [[mindful]], but not always necessarily the case - even the [[Buddha]] [[debates]] with non-Buddhists out of [[compassion]] for them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The [[Buddha]] said that there the number of his students who still 'enjoy [[sensual pleasures]]' and attain the stages of [[stream enterer]] and [[once returner]] are in the range of thousand, not hundred or dozens. ([[Anagamis]] and [[arahants]] no longer seek [[pleasure]] in [[senses]]) However, their ways of 'enjoying [[pleasures]]' must not be within the 'ten [[unwholesome]] [[deeds]]': [[Deed]] - | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 1. {{Wiki|Killing}} | ||
+ | 2. [[Stealing]] | ||
+ | 3. [[Sexual misconduct]]; [[Word]] – | ||
+ | 4. {{Wiki|Lying}} | ||
+ | 5. [[Slandering]] | ||
+ | 6. Harsh {{Wiki|speech}} | ||
+ | 7. Vain talk; [[Thought]] – | ||
+ | 8. Covetousness | ||
+ | 9. [[Hatred]] | ||
+ | 10. [[False view]], nor violate the [[five precepts]]: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 1. [[Do not kill]] | ||
+ | 2. [[Do not steal]] | ||
+ | 3. [[Do not indulge in sexual misconduct]] | ||
+ | 4. Do not make false {{Wiki|speech}} | ||
+ | 5. Do not take [[intoxicants]], as engaging in or indulging in any of those above mentioned [[unwholesome]] [[karmas]] result in [[rebirth]] in the [[lower realms]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A [[stream entrant]] is said by [[Buddha]] to have 'unbroken [[virtue]]', and cannot engage in [[deeds]] as to result in [[rebirth]] in [[lower realms]], such a [[person]] has cut off the [[roots]] of lower [[realm]] and can only be [[reborn]] as a [[human]] or [[deva]]. Even if minor mistakes are made, they are recognised, confessed, and ammendments are made. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 5:33am · Edited · Like · 5 | July 8 at 5:33am · Edited · Like · 5 | ||
− | Ja Nie Istnieje The answer is yes. [[Ego]] is no more, but [[karma]] is still here. | + | [[Ja]] Nie Istnieje The answer is yes. [[Ego]] is no more, but [[karma]] is still here. |
July 8 at 5:37am · Like | July 8 at 5:37am · Like | ||
− | Robert Dominik About [[drugs]] and [[hell]] wikipedia suggests something [[interesting]]: "Conversely, in [[Tibetan]] and {{Wiki|Sherpa}} lore there is a story about a [[monk]] who came across a woman who told him that he must either: | + | |
+ | |||
+ | [[Robert Dominik]] About [[drugs]] and [[hell]] wikipedia suggests something [[interesting]]: "Conversely, in [[Tibetan]] and {{Wiki|Sherpa}} lore there is a story about a [[monk]] who came across a woman who told him that he must either: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
a. kill her {{Wiki|goat}}, | a. kill her {{Wiki|goat}}, | ||
Line 73: | Line 145: | ||
d. All of the above. | d. All of the above. | ||
− | The [[monk]] [[thought]] to himself, "well, surely if I kill the {{Wiki|goat}} then I will be causing great [[suffering]] since a [[living being]] will [[die]]. If I [[sleep]] with the woman then I will have broken another great [[vow]] of a [[monk]] and will surely be lost to the ways of the [[world]]. Lastly, if I drink the beer then perhaps no great harm will come and I will only be {{Wiki|intoxicated}} for a while, and most importantly I will only be hurting myself." (In the context of the story this instance is of particular importance to him because [[monks]] in the [[Mahayana]] and [[Vajrayana]] try to bring all [[sentient beings]] to [[enlightenment]] as part of their goal.) | + | |
+ | |||
+ | The [[monk]] [[thought]] to himself, "well, surely if I kill the {{Wiki|goat}} then I will be causing great [[suffering]] since a [[living being]] will [[die]]. If I [[sleep]] with the woman then I will have broken another great [[vow]] of a [[monk]] and will surely be lost to the ways of the [[world]]. Lastly, if I drink the beer then perhaps no great harm will come and I will only be {{Wiki|intoxicated}} for a while, | ||
+ | |||
+ | and most importantly I will only be hurting myself." (In the context of the story this instance is of particular importance to him because [[monks]] in the [[Mahayana]] and [[Vajrayana]] try to bring all [[sentient beings]] to [[enlightenment]] as part of their goal.) | ||
+ | |||
So the [[monk]] drank the mug of beer and then he became very drunk. In his drunkenness he proceeded to kill the {{Wiki|goat}} and [[sleep]] with the woman, breaking all [[three vows]] and, at least in his [[eyes]], doing much harm in the [[world]]. The lesson of this story is meant to be that, at least according to the cultures from which it delineates, [[alcohol]] [[causes]] one to break all of one's [[vows]], in a [[sense]] that one could say it is the [[cause]] of all other harmful [[deeds]]." OFC wikipedia isn't the most reliable source but IMO this story is quite educating nevertheless. | So the [[monk]] drank the mug of beer and then he became very drunk. In his drunkenness he proceeded to kill the {{Wiki|goat}} and [[sleep]] with the woman, breaking all [[three vows]] and, at least in his [[eyes]], doing much harm in the [[world]]. The lesson of this story is meant to be that, at least according to the cultures from which it delineates, [[alcohol]] [[causes]] one to break all of one's [[vows]], in a [[sense]] that one could say it is the [[cause]] of all other harmful [[deeds]]." OFC wikipedia isn't the most reliable source but IMO this story is quite educating nevertheless. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 6:08am · Unlike · 2 | July 8 at 6:08am · Unlike · 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Dannon Flynn Good thing I am not a [[monk]], that would make the [[decision]] easier for me, unless she was repulsive... Of course, women are not coming to me telling me I either have to [[sleep]] with them, kill a {{Wiki|goat}}, or drink beer. | Dannon Flynn Good thing I am not a [[monk]], that would make the [[decision]] easier for me, unless she was repulsive... Of course, women are not coming to me telling me I either have to [[sleep]] with them, kill a {{Wiki|goat}}, or drink beer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 6:40am · Like · 4 | July 8 at 6:40am · Like · 4 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Dannon Flynn If she was repulsive I would choose to drink the beer...lol. Hopefully not get beer goggles. I would never kill a {{Wiki|goat}}, drunk or not. | Dannon Flynn If she was repulsive I would choose to drink the beer...lol. Hopefully not get beer goggles. I would never kill a {{Wiki|goat}}, drunk or not. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 7:18am · Like · 1 | July 8 at 7:18am · Like · 1 | ||
− | Robert Dominik Well my personal [[understanding]] revolves around the [[word]] heedlessness. If one can behave with presence and [[awareness]], not [[cause]] problems etc, then I think that using some [[intoxicants]] a bit might be ok - depending on the circumstances. For example in [[Ganapuja]] a little bit of [[alcohol]] is used (though only a little bit and many point to the fact that this is rather symbolical). Also [[Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche]] advocated the practice of [[Mindful]] Drinking. So I think this depends on the [[practitioner]] and the basic thing is to be {{Wiki|present}}, be {{Wiki|aware}} of the {{Wiki|consequences}} and have developed the [[intention]] of avoiding harm etc. But who [[knows]]? Maybe I'm just being liberal because I'm a shit [[practitioner]] xD | + | |
+ | |||
+ | [[Robert Dominik]] Well my personal [[understanding]] revolves around the [[word]] heedlessness. If one can behave with presence and [[awareness]], not [[cause]] problems etc, then I think that using some [[intoxicants]] a bit might be ok - depending on the circumstances. For example in [[Ganapuja]] a little bit of [[alcohol]] is used (though only a little bit and many point to the fact that this is rather | ||
+ | |||
+ | symbolical). Also [[Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche]] advocated the practice of [[Mindful]] Drinking. So I think this depends on the [[practitioner]] and the basic thing is to be {{Wiki|present}}, be {{Wiki|aware}} of the {{Wiki|consequences}} and have developed the [[intention]] of avoiding harm etc. But who [[knows]]? Maybe I'm just being liberal because I'm a shit [[practitioner]] xD | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 7:20am · Edited · Like | July 8 at 7:20am · Edited · Like | ||
− | Robert Dominik Obviously many [[people]] think they're {{Wiki|present}} and they're not causing harm when it is precisely the opposite. This also has to be underlined. | + | |
+ | [[Robert Dominik]] Obviously many [[people]] think they're {{Wiki|present}} and they're not causing harm when it is precisely the opposite. This also has to be underlined. | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 7:21am · Like | July 8 at 7:21am · Like | ||
− | Robert Dominik Leaving [[drugs]] (including [[alcohol]]) aside... When it comes to [[food]], partying, {{Wiki|sex}} [[music]], [[dancing]]... It depends on the school and [[tradition]] we practice in and our capacity. Some would [[benefit]] more by simply renouncing such {{Wiki|distractions}}. [[Mahayana]] also suggests that if we engage in these things but the [[intention]] behind our [[actions]] is benefitting others then it's something [[virtuous]] and positive (because the point is to make everything we do into a service for the [[sentient beings]] and their [[benefit]] - most importantly the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[benefit]] which is [[Liberation]]). For example we can dance with someone or sing a song if this makes the other [[person]] [[happier]] and helpes to relieve his/her [[suffering]] even if only a bit (of course this is temporary). The {{Wiki|literature}} suggests that even {{Wiki|sex}} with a woman one is not [[married]] with might be positive if there is some [[benefit]] in this. But... it is very, very, very easy to just delude oneself into [[thinking]] we're ok and just find tons of excuses, while having the [[worldly]] [[intention]] of induling in our [[passions]]. It is a thing I personally know too well. So [[honesty]] about one's [[actions]] is very imporant. Some basic [[discipline]], [[mindfulness]] and taming the [[mind]] with [[Shamatha]] are sine qua non. Lasting [[insights]] obviously solve a lot of these issues naturally (but it's easier to have [[insights]] when good [[conditions]] and the [[merit]] are there...). The thing gets even more complicated when it comes to [[Vajrayana]]. But [[Vajrayana]] works when a [[practitioner]] works with a [[Master]] and his advice... | + | |
+ | |||
+ | [[Robert Dominik]] Leaving [[drugs]] ([[including]] [[alcohol]]) aside... When it comes to [[food]], partying, {{Wiki|sex}} [[music]], [[dancing]]... It depends on the school and [[tradition]] we practice in and our capacity. Some would [[benefit]] more by simply renouncing such {{Wiki|distractions}}. [[Mahayana]] also suggests that if we engage in these things but the [[intention]] behind our [[actions]] is benefitting others then it's something [[virtuous]] and positive (because the point is to make everything we do into a service for the | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[sentient beings]] and their [[benefit]] - most importantly the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[benefit]] which is [[Liberation]]). For example we can [[dance]] with someone or sing a song if this makes the other [[person]] [[happier]] and helpes to relieve his/her [[suffering]] even if only a bit (of course this is temporary). The {{Wiki|literature}} suggests that even {{Wiki|sex}} with a woman | ||
+ | |||
+ | one is not [[married]] with might be positive if there is some [[benefit]] in this. But... it is very, very, very easy to just delude oneself into [[thinking]] we're ok and just find tons of excuses, while having the [[worldly]] [[intention]] of induling in our [[passions]]. It is a | ||
+ | |||
+ | thing I personally know too well. So [[honesty]] about one's [[actions]] is very imporant. Some basic [[discipline]], [[mindfulness]] and taming the [[mind]] with [[Shamatha]] are [[sine]] qua non. Lasting [[insights]] obviously solve a lot of these issues naturally (but it's easier to have [[insights]] when good [[conditions]] and the [[merit]] are there...). The thing gets even more complicated when it comes to [[Vajrayana]]. But [[Vajrayana]] works when a [[practitioner]] works with a [[Master]] and his advice... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 7:31am · Edited · Like | July 8 at 7:31am · Edited · Like | ||
− | Dannon Flynn I see no problem with [[dancing]]. It is good for you, like a [[yoga]]. Likewise [[music]] can arouse [[devotion]]. All these things can be taken on the [[path]] with the [[right attitude]]. [[Dancing]] can even happen spontaneously as an expression of [[joy]]. The [[mahasiddhas]] expressed their [[realization]] with song and dance. These things are not inherently egoic or negative. | + | |
+ | |||
+ | Dannon Flynn I see no problem with [[dancing]]. It is good for you, like a [[yoga]]. Likewise [[music]] can arouse [[devotion]]. All these things can be taken on the [[path]] with the [[right attitude]]. [[Dancing]] can even happen spontaneously as an expression of [[joy]]. The [[mahasiddhas]] expressed their [[realization]] with song and [[dance]]. These things are not inherently egoic or negative. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 12:08pm · Like · 1 | July 8 at 12:08pm · Like · 1 | ||
Kyle Dixon Stuffs, the "who is grateful" type of [[view]] is really more along the lines of neo-nondual [[logic]], neo-advaita and so on. | Kyle Dixon Stuffs, the "who is grateful" type of [[view]] is really more along the lines of neo-nondual [[logic]], neo-advaita and so on. | ||
+ | |||
In [[Buddhism]] it is a given that there is no [[inherent]] [[self]] who is grateful, so there's no need to further reject the apparent grateful [[person]]. Who is grateful is you, and practice/insight will reveal the true face of what an absence of an [[inherent]] [[self]] means, but it still will not contradict your ability to be grateful. | In [[Buddhism]] it is a given that there is no [[inherent]] [[self]] who is grateful, so there's no need to further reject the apparent grateful [[person]]. Who is grateful is you, and practice/insight will reveal the true face of what an absence of an [[inherent]] [[self]] means, but it still will not contradict your ability to be grateful. | ||
Anyone who spouts the "who is grateful" type [[rhetoric]] is most likely someone I would take advice from with a grain of [[salt]]... or not at all. | Anyone who spouts the "who is grateful" type [[rhetoric]] is most likely someone I would take advice from with a grain of [[salt]]... or not at all. | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 12:41pm · Unlike · 8 | July 8 at 12:41pm · Unlike · 8 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Kyle Dixon Most of the [[time]] those who [[grasp]] at the "who is there to do this, who is there to do that" [[view]] are simply identifying with an [[idea]] of a lack of [[self]]. | Kyle Dixon Most of the [[time]] those who [[grasp]] at the "who is there to do this, who is there to do that" [[view]] are simply identifying with an [[idea]] of a lack of [[self]]. | ||
Line 102: | Line 217: | ||
There's a certain self-appointed Facebook [[guru]] (who teaches a faint semblance of [[Dzogchen]] dressed in neo-nondual drag), who makes these types of errors. It is a [[shame]]. | There's a certain self-appointed Facebook [[guru]] (who teaches a faint semblance of [[Dzogchen]] dressed in neo-nondual drag), who makes these types of errors. It is a [[shame]]. | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 1:01pm · Unlike · 5 | July 8 at 1:01pm · Unlike · 5 | ||
− | Robert Dominik "certain self-appointed Facebook [[guru]]" <- He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. Also known as Dark Lord or as Voldemort XD | + | [[Robert Dominik]] "certain self-appointed Facebook [[guru]]" <- He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. Also known as Dark Lord or as Voldemort XD |
July 8 at 1:11pm · Like · 2 | July 8 at 1:11pm · Like · 2 | ||
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland "I undertake the precept to refrain from dancing, singing, music, going to see entertainments." | Stian Gudmundsen Høiland "I undertake the precept to refrain from dancing, singing, music, going to see entertainments." | ||
Line 132: | Line 248: | ||
That said, I do not think 'music' in itself is a cause for rebirth in hell. I know that the ten unwholesome deeds are causes for rebirth in lower realms. Interestingly I do not think that the 'stream enterer' is said to have given up singing and dancing. It is only natural that an arahant (and anagami) have given up singing and dancing as they have ended the fetter of sensual desire. They have also given up sexual activities as they simply do not have sexual desires anymore. | That said, I do not think 'music' in itself is a cause for rebirth in hell. I know that the ten unwholesome deeds are causes for rebirth in lower realms. Interestingly I do not think that the 'stream enterer' is said to have given up singing and dancing. It is only natural that an arahant (and anagami) have given up singing and dancing as they have ended the fetter of sensual desire. They have also given up sexual activities as they simply do not have sexual desires anymore. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 8 at 4:31pm · Edited · Like · 1 | July 8 at 4:31pm · Edited · Like · 1 | ||
Wei Yu However: an actor (who entices passions in others, and makes others focus on their passions) is said to go into an actor's hell by the Buddha. | Wei Yu However: an actor (who entices passions in others, and makes others focus on their passions) is said to go into an actor's hell by the Buddha. | ||
Line 143: | Line 261: | ||
Then again, Gotama spoke them for the purpose of enabling the Sangha to attain the highest good, and that's not something to take lightly, methinks. | Then again, Gotama spoke them for the purpose of enabling the Sangha to attain the highest good, and that's not something to take lightly, methinks. | ||
July 8 at 4:39pm · Edited · Like | July 8 at 4:39pm · Edited · Like | ||
+ | |||
Wei Yu I don't really think he was in any way 'strict'. His five precepts for lay people are only like what... 1 to 2% of the number of rules as compared to monastic community? Yes, certainly, those rules are very strict for the monastic people, but that is monasticism -- they have given up the lay life of enjoying sensual pleasures to focus completely on spiritual development and helping others spiritually. | Wei Yu I don't really think he was in any way 'strict'. His five precepts for lay people are only like what... 1 to 2% of the number of rules as compared to monastic community? Yes, certainly, those rules are very strict for the monastic people, but that is monasticism -- they have given up the lay life of enjoying sensual pleasures to focus completely on spiritual development and helping others spiritually. | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 4:43pm · Edited · Like · 1 | July 8 at 4:43pm · Edited · Like · 1 | ||
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland Yes, and that was the strongly recommended way of development. | Stian Gudmundsen Høiland Yes, and that was the strongly recommended way of development. | ||
Line 169: | Line 289: | ||
-- http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/ud/ud.6.02.than.html | -- http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/ud/ud.6.02.than.html | ||
Pa?isalla Sutta: Seclusion | Pa?isalla Sutta: Seclusion | ||
+ | |||
www.accesstoinsight.org | www.accesstoinsight.org | ||
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi at t... See More | I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi at t... See More | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 11:50pm · Edited · Like · 3 · Remove Preview | July 8 at 11:50pm · Edited · Like · 3 · Remove Preview | ||
Wei Yu Also lets just say, I am not very impressed with Sogyal Rinpoche at all. Whether his behaviour or his teachings. I don't care if he is a lineaged teacher... one should use discernment to judge. | Wei Yu Also lets just say, I am not very impressed with Sogyal Rinpoche at all. Whether his behaviour or his teachings. I don't care if he is a lineaged teacher... one should use discernment to judge. | ||
+ | |||
July 8 at 11:37pm · Edited · Like · 3 | July 8 at 11:37pm · Edited · Like · 3 | ||
Alan Koek nice thread... | Alan Koek nice thread... | ||
Line 180: | Line 303: | ||
How about conceit - can that be ego too? | How about conceit - can that be ego too? | ||
July 8 at 11:51pm · Edited · Like | July 8 at 11:51pm · Edited · Like | ||
+ | |||
Wei Yu Alan: perhaps nowadays some of those monastic community are more lax on precepts. I wouldn't judge them just on that though. | Wei Yu Alan: perhaps nowadays some of those monastic community are more lax on precepts. I wouldn't judge them just on that though. | ||
Line 189: | Line 313: | ||
Bhikkhus, these five are the dangers for reciting the teaching in a musical tone. | Bhikkhus, these five are the dangers for reciting the teaching in a musical tone. | ||
5:21 Kimbilavaggo - English | 5:21 Kimbilavaggo - English | ||
+ | |||
www.metta.lk | www.metta.lk | ||
021.01. At one time The Blessed One was living with venerable Kimbila in the bam... See More | 021.01. At one time The Blessed One was living with venerable Kimbila in the bam... See More | ||
Line 194: | Line 319: | ||
Wei Yu Ill will is always a form of egoic thought yes | Wei Yu Ill will is always a form of egoic thought yes | ||
July 9 at 12:01am · Edited · Like · 1 | July 9 at 12:01am · Edited · Like · 1 | ||
− | Wei Yu Buddhist Monastic Code Vol. 2 by Ven. Thanissaro Bhikkhu (p. 111) wrote:There is a dukka?a for going to see dancing, singing, or music. According to the Commentary, dancing includes going to see even peacocks dancing. It also includes dancing oneself and getting others to dance. (The Ro?a Sutta — AN III.103 — notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, dancing counts as insanity.) Singing includes drama music as well as "sadhu music," which the Commentary to Bhikkhuni Pc 10 defines as songs sung "at the time of the total Unbinding of a noble one, connected with the virtues of the Triple Gem." The Sub-commentary to Cv.V.36 defines it as music dealing with Dhamma themes such as impermanence. Other religious music would come under this prohibition as well. The Commentary adds that singing also includes singing oneself and getting others to sing. The same holds true for "playing music." (The Ro?a Sutta also notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, singing counts as wailing.) However, there is no offense in snapping one's fingers or clapping one's hands in irritation or exasperation. There is also no offense if, within the monastery, one happens to see/hear dancing, singing, or music, but if one goes from one dwelling to another with the intention to see/hear, one incurs a dukka?a. The same holds true for getting up from one's seat with the intention to see/hear; or if, while standing in a road, one turns one's neck to see. | + | |
+ | |||
+ | Wei Yu Buddhist Monastic Code Vol. 2 by Ven. Thanissaro Bhikkhu (p. 111) wrote:There is a dukka?a for going to see dancing, singing, or music. According to the Commentary, dancing includes going to see even peacocks dancing. It also includes dancing oneself and getting others to dance. (The Ro?a Sutta — AN III.103 — notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, dancing counts as insanity.) Singing includes drama music as well as "sadhu music," which the Commentary to Bhikkhuni Pc 10 defines as songs sung "at the time of the total Unbinding of a noble | ||
+ | |||
+ | one, connected with the virtues of the Triple Gem." The Sub-commentary to Cv.V.36 defines it as music dealing with Dhamma themes such as impermanence. Other religious music would come under this prohibition as well. The Commentary adds that singing also includes singing oneself and getting others to sing. The same holds true for "playing music." (The Ro?a Sutta also notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, | ||
+ | |||
+ | singing counts as wailing.) However, there is no offense in snapping one's fingers or clapping one's hands in irritation or exasperation. There is also no offense if, within the monastery, one happens to see/hear dancing, singing, or music, but if one goes from one dwelling to | ||
+ | |||
+ | another with the intention to see/hear, one incurs a dukka?a. The same holds true for getting up from one's seat with the intention to see/hear; or if, while standing in a road, one turns one's neck to see. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 9 at 12:03am · Like · 1 | July 9 at 12:03am · Like · 1 | ||
Alan Koek maybe... like what others say, skillful means | Alan Koek maybe... like what others say, skillful means | ||
Line 200: | Line 335: | ||
David Vardy Things just naturally 'drop off', in a manner of speaking... | David Vardy Things just naturally 'drop off', in a manner of speaking... | ||
July 9 at 2:55am · Unlike · 2 | July 9 at 2:55am · Unlike · 2 | ||
− | Dannon Flynn All of this applies to the path of renunciation. It seems to me that it doesn't quite apply as much to the Vajrayana where sensuality is included in the path. For example, Padmasambhava, Tilopa, Saraha, etc etc all had Tantric consorts. Not to indulge in sensual pleasures or to become attached, but in order to transform them. Even to avoid strictly seems to be a form of attachment. I wonder if there are similar prohibitions for Nyingma or Kagyu schools? | + | |
+ | |||
+ | Dannon Flynn All of this applies to the path of renunciation. It seems to me that it doesn't quite apply as much to the Vajrayana where sensuality is included in the path. For example, [[Padmasambhava]], [[Tilopa]], [[Saraha]], etc etc all had [[Tantric consorts]]. Not to indulge in sensual pleasures or to become attached, but in order to transform them. Even to avoid strictly seems to be a form of attachment. I wonder if there are similar prohibitions for Nyingma or Kagyu schools? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 9 at 4:37am · Like · 3 | July 9 at 4:37am · Like · 3 | ||
अष्टावक्र शान्ति There is also this kind of guy... | अष्टावक्र शान्ति There is also this kind of guy... | ||
Line 207: | Line 346: | ||
Kyle Dixon Prohibitions in tantra really depends from teacher to teacher. | Kyle Dixon Prohibitions in tantra really depends from teacher to teacher. | ||
July 9 at 5:02am · Like · 1 | July 9 at 5:02am · Like · 1 | ||
+ | |||
Dannon Flynn For example, the negative kleshas are taken onto the path and transformed into wisdom in Vajrayana, rather than renounced. | Dannon Flynn For example, the negative kleshas are taken onto the path and transformed into wisdom in Vajrayana, rather than renounced. | ||
July 9 at 5:06am · Like | July 9 at 5:06am · Like | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Wei Yu Interestingly, Loppon Malcolm wrote, "...I should add, no one takes desire [or the other afflictions] as a path except for people who wish to continue to cycle in samsara. One can take sense objects into the path through using the sadhana method if you did not achieve liberation through receiving empowerment." | Wei Yu Interestingly, Loppon Malcolm wrote, "...I should add, no one takes desire [or the other afflictions] as a path except for people who wish to continue to cycle in samsara. One can take sense objects into the path through using the sadhana method if you did not achieve liberation through receiving empowerment." | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
July 9 at 1:29pm · Like · 4 | July 9 at 1:29pm · Like · 4 | ||
Logan Truthe Buddha said, only one like myself can judge others | Logan Truthe Buddha said, only one like myself can judge others | ||
July 9 at 2:03pm · Like · 1 | July 9 at 2:03pm · Like · 1 | ||
− | Si M Ba The second of the Four Seals, states that all emotions arising from ego lead to suffering. A person who has realized Anatta would therefor not be acting from ego fixation but could get emotional without the emphasis on ego. Perhaps then, emotional display can happen for other reasons. however, if some practitioner is claiming to have realized anatta and also claims that expressions of emotions are then ok--is just trying to make an extra million... | + | |
+ | |||
+ | Si M Ba The second of the [[Four Seals]], states that all emotions arising from ego lead to suffering. A person who has realized Anatta would therefor not be acting from ego fixation but could get emotional without the emphasis on ego. Perhaps then, emotional display can happen for other reasons. however, if some practitioner is claiming to have realized anatta and also claims that expressions of emotions are then ok--is just trying to make an extra million... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
[http://dharmaconnectiongroup.blogspot.com.au/2014/08/ego-after-realization-precepts-teachers.html dharmaconnectiongroup.blogspot.com.au] | [http://dharmaconnectiongroup.blogspot.com.au/2014/08/ego-after-realization-precepts-teachers.html dharmaconnectiongroup.blogspot.com.au] | ||
[[Category:Anatta]] | [[Category:Anatta]] |
Latest revision as of 20:24, 11 April 2024
Stuffs Red Turtle
July 8
Would someone who has realized anatta still behave in an egoic way?
Entertain and enact on dualistic negative thought?
Such as affairs drug addiction, needless egoic arguing etc?
LikeLike ·
Joel Agee, Viorica Doina Neacsu, Eezy Isempty and 3 others like this.
Stuffs RedTurtle My understanding is no, but some others say yes, so I just wanted thoughts
July 8 at 2:40am · Like · 1
Wei Yu According to the suttas, someone who has realized anatta directly, perceived the nature of dharma and became a stream enterer, such a person would be incapable of indulging in unwholesome ways that could land himself into the lower realms, his virtues would be great, and even if he/she were to make a slight mistake they will realize it and make ammends. In other words, no, according to suttas it is impossible for someone who is truly awakened to be a drug addict. However does a
stream enterer still have ego? Possibly yes - there is still some trace of the sense of self, even though a stream enterer has totally removed the view or belief in a self due to his/her direct insight into anatta, nonetheless the trace of self is present, and only the arahant has fully removed the conceit of 'I Am'.
July 8 at 2:59am · Like · 8
Justin Chapweske Of course you can behave in an egoic way. I do it all the time.
July 8 at 3:34am · Unlike · 7
Wei Yu Hahaha.. well at least you're honest
July 8 at 3:36am · Like · 3
Stuffs RedTurtle Well, why I was wondering this is because some say that the habits that are due to karmic conditioning would still be active even though the ego has been seen through, ego being sense of self. What Soh posted makes sense to me, because if there is no longer a sense of subject it would seem that these conditions would at the very least be severely reduced or at least immediately recognized for what they are,
Like anger as a defense if self: no subject no projected anger because there would be nothing to defend
No arrogance because arrogance due to pride, which stems from heavy defense of self
I thought maybe addictions but no I guess it couldn't because the root of addictions is escaping pain.
Thank you all
July 8 at 3:55am · Edited · Like · 1
Lindsay Funk "Would someone who has realized anatta still behave in an egoic way?"
It sure looks that way.
IME, there's the conscious realization of view, but embodied habits rooted in separation can continue indefinitely. It seems to me that the depth and clarity of anatta insight has a lot to do with how much karma gets washed away.
July 8 at 4:21am · Like · 4
Albert Hong Its like walking around. So many things can seduce you.
You can play. But you sure as hell know its not a worthy refuge.
July 8 at 4:45am · Like · 1
Brian Zey (Totally off topic, but Lindsay Funk I love your "Smooth Canadian" pic.)
sorry for the interuption.
July 8 at 4:56am · Like · 3
Stuffs RedTurtle Another reason I ask is because my focus right now other than being mindful in the present is changing my perceptions so shitty thoughts don't fill my head and lead me astray. I'm very prone to negative outlook, and it struck me that this is due to selfishness and ungratefulness. So I thought to, if I am going to be content and reduce coveting, I should be greatful for what's in front of me, so when I am attending to remaining present I won't be overwhelmed by thoughts of future or past, wanting or not wanting, but then someone ( not in my sangha) informed me this will only reinforce sense of self, but I am wondering if that is actually the case.
July 8 at 4:56am · Like
Wei Yu What you said sounds good, not sure why someone might say it will reinforce sense of self?
Thusness told me two weeks ago: "We think too much of ourselves, "I" being central and the all. So we cannot know how fortunate we r to b just "here" even at this moment...the infinite ?? (causes and conditions) that r involved. Be grateful and reverent for all these, we will b happier."
July 8 at 5:08am · Like · 5
Stuffs RedTurtle Oh cool
Their point was "who is grateful"
But to me that doesn't get at the underlying causes for selfish behavior, thinking, if these things aren't addressed.
July 8 at 5:09am · Edited · Like
Stuffs RedTurtle Ha ha ha. That sucks but I can see how listening to music might create more karma thoughts, memories, rumination lol
July 8 at 5:19am · Like
Robert Dominik Drugs, arguments, sex, music, good food, dancing, movies...
July 8 at 5:21am · Edited · Like
Stuffs RedTurtle Also interesting to see the emotions and sense of self that come up during certain songs:
Like when I listen to book of black earths first album
Oddly, pride enjoyment and apparently a great enjoyment in songs about ancient demons letting loose on humanity
Before I thought I really just liked metal
July 8 at 5:23am · Like
Stuffs RedTurtle ( those two referring to post that has disappeared) ^^
July 8 at 5:23am · Like
Wei Yu There are some relative differences though. For example, the Buddha have said that intoxicants (which causes heedlessness) taken regularly and habitually results in rebirth in hell, or even if reborn as human one will suffer insanity. Sex -- Buddha has not said that an appropriate sexual activity between spouses would result in
unwholesome karmas that lead to rebirth in lower realms, on the other hand, it would certainly be the case that if someone engages in sexual misconducts, that could result in rebirth in lower realms. Also, for example, listening to music and eating good food are not necessarily unwholesome deeds that result in rebirth in lower realms. However if listening to
music somehow incites hatred, that would be unwholesome karma. 'Arguments' however could often end up in one of the four unwholesome speeches, so one must be mindful, but not always necessarily the case - even the Buddha debates with non-Buddhists out of compassion for them.
The Buddha said that there the number of his students who still 'enjoy sensual pleasures' and attain the stages of stream enterer and once returner are in the range of thousand, not hundred or dozens. (Anagamis and arahants no longer seek pleasure in senses) However, their ways of 'enjoying pleasures' must not be within the 'ten unwholesome deeds': Deed -
1. Killing
2. Stealing
3. Sexual misconduct; Word –
4. Lying
5. Slandering
6. Harsh speech
7. Vain talk; Thought –
8. Covetousness
9. Hatred
10. False view, nor violate the five precepts:
1. Do not kill
2. Do not steal
3. Do not indulge in sexual misconduct
4. Do not make false speech
5. Do not take intoxicants, as engaging in or indulging in any of those above mentioned unwholesome karmas result in rebirth in the lower realms.
A stream entrant is said by Buddha to have 'unbroken virtue', and cannot engage in deeds as to result in rebirth in lower realms, such a person has cut off the roots of lower realm and can only be reborn as a human or deva. Even if minor mistakes are made, they are recognised, confessed, and ammendments are made.
July 8 at 5:33am · Edited · Like · 5
Ja Nie Istnieje The answer is yes. Ego is no more, but karma is still here.
July 8 at 5:37am · Like
Robert Dominik About drugs and hell wikipedia suggests something interesting: "Conversely, in Tibetan and Sherpa lore there is a story about a monk who came across a woman who told him that he must either:
a. kill her goat,
b. sleep with her, or
c. drink a mug of beer.
d. All of the above.
The monk thought to himself, "well, surely if I kill the goat then I will be causing great suffering since a living being will die. If I sleep with the woman then I will have broken another great vow of a monk and will surely be lost to the ways of the world. Lastly, if I drink the beer then perhaps no great harm will come and I will only be intoxicated for a while,
and most importantly I will only be hurting myself." (In the context of the story this instance is of particular importance to him because monks in the Mahayana and Vajrayana try to bring all sentient beings to enlightenment as part of their goal.)
So the monk drank the mug of beer and then he became very drunk. In his drunkenness he proceeded to kill the goat and sleep with the woman, breaking all three vows and, at least in his eyes, doing much harm in the world. The lesson of this story is meant to be that, at least according to the cultures from which it delineates, alcohol causes one to break all of one's vows, in a sense that one could say it is the cause of all other harmful deeds." OFC wikipedia isn't the most reliable source but IMO this story is quite educating nevertheless.
July 8 at 6:08am · Unlike · 2
Dannon Flynn Good thing I am not a monk, that would make the decision easier for me, unless she was repulsive... Of course, women are not coming to me telling me I either have to sleep with them, kill a goat, or drink beer.
July 8 at 6:40am · Like · 4
Dannon Flynn If she was repulsive I would choose to drink the beer...lol. Hopefully not get beer goggles. I would never kill a goat, drunk or not.
July 8 at 7:18am · Like · 1
Robert Dominik Well my personal understanding revolves around the word heedlessness. If one can behave with presence and awareness, not cause problems etc, then I think that using some intoxicants a bit might be ok - depending on the circumstances. For example in Ganapuja a little bit of alcohol is used (though only a little bit and many point to the fact that this is rather
symbolical). Also Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche advocated the practice of Mindful Drinking. So I think this depends on the practitioner and the basic thing is to be present, be aware of the consequences and have developed the intention of avoiding harm etc. But who knows? Maybe I'm just being liberal because I'm a shit practitioner xD
July 8 at 7:20am · Edited · Like
Robert Dominik Obviously many people think they're present and they're not causing harm when it is precisely the opposite. This also has to be underlined.
July 8 at 7:21am · Like
Robert Dominik Leaving drugs (including alcohol) aside... When it comes to food, partying, sex music, dancing... It depends on the school and tradition we practice in and our capacity. Some would benefit more by simply renouncing such distractions. Mahayana also suggests that if we engage in these things but the intention behind our actions is benefitting others then it's something virtuous and positive (because the point is to make everything we do into a service for the
sentient beings and their benefit - most importantly the ultimate benefit which is Liberation). For example we can dance with someone or sing a song if this makes the other person happier and helpes to relieve his/her suffering even if only a bit (of course this is temporary). The literature suggests that even sex with a woman
one is not married with might be positive if there is some benefit in this. But... it is very, very, very easy to just delude oneself into thinking we're ok and just find tons of excuses, while having the worldly intention of induling in our passions. It is a
thing I personally know too well. So honesty about one's actions is very imporant. Some basic discipline, mindfulness and taming the mind with Shamatha are sine qua non. Lasting insights obviously solve a lot of these issues naturally (but it's easier to have insights when good conditions and the merit are there...). The thing gets even more complicated when it comes to Vajrayana. But Vajrayana works when a practitioner works with a Master and his advice...
July 8 at 7:31am · Edited · Like
Dannon Flynn I see no problem with dancing. It is good for you, like a yoga. Likewise music can arouse devotion. All these things can be taken on the path with the right attitude. Dancing can even happen spontaneously as an expression of joy. The mahasiddhas expressed their realization with song and dance. These things are not inherently egoic or negative.
July 8 at 12:08pm · Like · 1
Kyle Dixon Stuffs, the "who is grateful" type of view is really more along the lines of neo-nondual logic, neo-advaita and so on.
In Buddhism it is a given that there is no inherent self who is grateful, so there's no need to further reject the apparent grateful person. Who is grateful is you, and practice/insight will reveal the true face of what an absence of an inherent self means, but it still will not contradict your ability to be grateful.
Anyone who spouts the "who is grateful" type rhetoric is most likely someone I would take advice from with a grain of salt... or not at all.
July 8 at 12:41pm · Unlike · 8
Kyle Dixon Most of the time those who grasp at the "who is there to do this, who is there to do that" view are simply identifying with an idea of a lack of self.
You can ask them the same question; who is it that is asking 'who is grateful'? Who is it that believes there is no self to be grateful? And they'll say 'there's no one!' all while not understanding cause and condition in the least.
They don't understand that cause and condition produces the action that the conventional self is extrapolated out of. Instead they negate the conventional self and proclaim that resolves actions, never even addressing causes and conditions... which is completely backwards.
There's a certain self-appointed Facebook guru (who teaches a faint semblance of Dzogchen dressed in neo-nondual drag), who makes these types of errors. It is a shame.
July 8 at 1:01pm · Unlike · 5
Robert Dominik "certain self-appointed Facebook guru" <- He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. Also known as Dark Lord or as Voldemort XD
July 8 at 1:11pm · Like · 2
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland "I undertake the precept to refrain from dancing, singing, music, going to see entertainments."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sila/dasasila.html
"And what six ways of squandering wealth are to be avoided? Young man, heedlessness caused by intoxication, roaming the streets at inappropriate times, habitual partying, compulsive gambling, bad companionship, and laziness are the six ways of squandering wealth.
These are the six dangers inherent in heedlessness caused by intoxication: loss of immediate wealth, increased quarreling, susceptibility to illness, disrepute, indecent exposure, and weakened insight.
(...)
These are the six dangers inherent in habitual partying: You constantly seek, 'Where's the dancing? Where's the singing? Where's the music? Where are the stories? Where's the applause? Where's the drumming?'"
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.31.0.ksw0.html
"All arahants, for as long as life lasts, have given up singing and dancing, the playing of musical instruments and the watching of entertainments, which are stumbling blocks to that which is wholesome."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanavara/uposatha.html
Gotama specifically called dancing "a madness" (but I can't find it atm. EDIT: Found it: Runna Sutta).
There is lots more to this effect in the suttas.
July 8 at 1:59pm · Edited · Like
Wei Yu Yeah, however, those precepts are usually undertaken in retreat settings. This is because to develope jhanas you will need to overcome sensuality. However for the lay person, it is standard to take only five precepts training on a non-retreat setting.
The Buddha was against music, certainly, in fact he bans music in his monastic community. His reason was that different people have different tastes for music and secondly music causes attachments (makes sense - it creates a mental loop which can disturb meditation at first). Nowadays many monastic people are creating Buddhist music, as a 'skillful means' to attract the common lay people, but it is actually against the monastic precepts. (The Rona Sutta also notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, singing counts as wailing.)
That said, I do not think 'music' in itself is a cause for rebirth in hell. I know that the ten unwholesome deeds are causes for rebirth in lower realms. Interestingly I do not think that the 'stream enterer' is said to have given up singing and dancing. It is only natural that an arahant (and anagami) have given up singing and dancing as they have ended the fetter of sensual desire. They have also given up sexual activities as they simply do not have sexual desires anymore.
July 8 at 4:31pm · Edited · Like · 1
Wei Yu However: an actor (who entices passions in others, and makes others focus on their passions) is said to go into an actor's hell by the Buddha.
July 8 at 4:23pm · Like · 1
Wei Yu That being said, I seriously doubt that truly awakened people will be into 'habitual partying' or 'squandering wealth'. After all, they have 'unbroken virtue'.
July 8 at 4:35pm · Edited · Like
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland I'm undecided on how seriously I should take these specific teachings.
On one hand, they seem rather strict and maybe those things could be acknowledged as skillful means under special circumstances (see rest of Buddhism
Then again, Gotama spoke them for the purpose of enabling the Sangha to attain the highest good, and that's not something to take lightly, methinks.
July 8 at 4:39pm · Edited · Like
Wei Yu I don't really think he was in any way 'strict'. His five precepts for lay people are only like what... 1 to 2% of the number of rules as compared to monastic community? Yes, certainly, those rules are very strict for the monastic people, but that is monasticism -- they have given up the lay life of enjoying sensual pleasures to focus completely on spiritual development and helping others spiritually.
July 8 at 4:43pm · Edited · Like · 1
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland Yes, and that was the strongly recommended way of development.
July 8 at 4:45pm · Like
Ahmed Abdelmeguid saw this clip today
July 8 at 10:44pm · Like
Ahmed Abdelmeguid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWhIivvmMnk
July 8 at 10:44pm · Like
Ahmed Abdelmeguid makes one wonder if (if the sexual harassment accusations are true to begin with) sogyal rinpoche is a stream enterer? no?
July 8 at 10:47pm · Like
Ahmed Abdelmeguid if it would really be the case that a holy person is not able to break the precepts then i guess stuff like that shouldn't happen...
July 8 at 10:49pm · Like · 1
Wei Yu I would be very wary of calling someone 'stream enterer' just because one is a famous teacher. True stream enterers are frankly not that common even among teachers.
I am disappointed with lots of teachers nowadays. One must get to know their teachings and wisdom and judge accordingly.. even the Buddha said,
"..."Great king, as a layman enjoying sensual pleasures; living confined with children; using Kasi fabrics & sandalwood; wearing garlands, scents, & creams; handling gold & silver, it's hard for you to know whether these are arahants or on the path to arahantship...
..."'It's through living together that a person's virtue may be known, and then only after a long period, not a short period; by one who is attentive, not by one who is inattentive; by one who is discerning, not by one who is not discerning.
"'It's through trading with a person that his purity may be known, and then only after a long period, not a short period; by one who is attentive, not by one who is inattentive; by one who is discerning, not by one who is not discerning...
..."'It's through discussion that a person's discernment may be known, and then only after a long period, not a short period; by one who is attentive, not by one who is inattentive; by one who is discerning, not by one who is not discerning.'..."
-- http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/ud/ud.6.02.than.html
Pa?isalla Sutta: Seclusion
www.accesstoinsight.org
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi at t... See More
July 8 at 11:50pm · Edited · Like · 3 · Remove Preview
Wei Yu Also lets just say, I am not very impressed with Sogyal Rinpoche at all. Whether his behaviour or his teachings. I don't care if he is a lineaged teacher... one should use discernment to judge.
July 8 at 11:37pm · Edited · Like · 3
Alan Koek nice thread...
@ Soh, how about venerables singing buddhist songs...? e.g. ???, heart sutra etc...? Is it an offence..?
Is ill-will consider as a form of ego...? (i've been thinking this because it is still exist in stream-enterers right)
How about conceit - can that be ego too?
July 8 at 11:51pm · Edited · Like
Wei Yu Alan: perhaps nowadays some of those monastic community are more lax on precepts. I wouldn't judge them just on that though.
http://www.metta.lk/tipitaka/2Sutta-Pitaka/4Anguttara-Nikaya/Anguttara3/5-pancakanipata/021-kimbilavaggo-e.html
9. Gãtassarasuttaü Ý Musical sounds
Bhikkhus, these five are the dangers for reciting the teaching in a musical tone. What five?
Oneself gets attached to the tone, others too get attached to the tone, householders laugh at it: In the manner that we sing, the sons of the recluse Gotama sing, the concentration of those who do not like musical notes gets destroyed. The later generation copy it.
Bhikkhus, these five are the dangers for reciting the teaching in a musical tone.
5:21 Kimbilavaggo - English
www.metta.lk
021.01. At one time The Blessed One was living with venerable Kimbila in the bam... See More
July 9 at 12:01am · Edited · Like · 2 · Remove Preview
Wei Yu Ill will is always a form of egoic thought yes
July 9 at 12:01am · Edited · Like · 1
Wei Yu Buddhist Monastic Code Vol. 2 by Ven. Thanissaro Bhikkhu (p. 111) wrote:There is a dukka?a for going to see dancing, singing, or music. According to the Commentary, dancing includes going to see even peacocks dancing. It also includes dancing oneself and getting others to dance. (The Ro?a Sutta — AN III.103 — notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones, dancing counts as insanity.) Singing includes drama music as well as "sadhu music," which the Commentary to Bhikkhuni Pc 10 defines as songs sung "at the time of the total Unbinding of a noble
one, connected with the virtues of the Triple Gem." The Sub-commentary to Cv.V.36 defines it as music dealing with Dhamma themes such as impermanence. Other religious music would come under this prohibition as well. The Commentary adds that singing also includes singing oneself and getting others to sing. The same holds true for "playing music." (The Ro?a Sutta also notes that, in the discipline of the noble ones,
singing counts as wailing.) However, there is no offense in snapping one's fingers or clapping one's hands in irritation or exasperation. There is also no offense if, within the monastery, one happens to see/hear dancing, singing, or music, but if one goes from one dwelling to
another with the intention to see/hear, one incurs a dukka?a. The same holds true for getting up from one's seat with the intention to see/hear; or if, while standing in a road, one turns one's neck to see.
July 9 at 12:03am · Like · 1
Alan Koek maybe... like what others say, skillful means
July 9 at 12:11am · Like · 1
David Vardy Things just naturally 'drop off', in a manner of speaking...
July 9 at 2:55am · Unlike · 2
Dannon Flynn All of this applies to the path of renunciation. It seems to me that it doesn't quite apply as much to the Vajrayana where sensuality is included in the path. For example, Padmasambhava, Tilopa, Saraha, etc etc all had Tantric consorts. Not to indulge in sensual pleasures or to become attached, but in order to transform them. Even to avoid strictly seems to be a form of attachment. I wonder if there are similar prohibitions for Nyingma or Kagyu schools?
July 9 at 4:37am · Like · 3
अष्टावक्र शान्ति There is also this kind of guy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drukpa_Kunley
July 9 at 4:52am · Like · 1
Kyle Dixon Prohibitions in tantra really depends from teacher to teacher.
July 9 at 5:02am · Like · 1
Dannon Flynn For example, the negative kleshas are taken onto the path and transformed into wisdom in Vajrayana, rather than renounced.
July 9 at 5:06am · Like
Wei Yu Interestingly, Loppon Malcolm wrote, "...I should add, no one takes desire [or the other afflictions] as a path except for people who wish to continue to cycle in samsara. One can take sense objects into the path through using the sadhana method if you did not achieve liberation through receiving empowerment."
July 9 at 1:29pm · Like · 4
Logan Truthe Buddha said, only one like myself can judge others
July 9 at 2:03pm · Like · 1
Si M Ba The second of the Four Seals, states that all emotions arising from ego lead to suffering. A person who has realized Anatta would therefor not be acting from ego fixation but could get emotional without the emphasis on ego. Perhaps then, emotional display can happen for other reasons. however, if some practitioner is claiming to have realized anatta and also claims that expressions of emotions are then ok--is just trying to make an extra million...