Difference between revisions of "Buddhist Epistemology and Darwin's Theory of Evolution"
m (Text replacement - "]]]" to "]])") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DisplayImages|1848|688}} | {{DisplayImages|1848|688}} | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | The goal of [[Buddhism]] is to help alleviate [[human]] [[suffering]]. The [[Second Noble Truth]] states that "[[craving]]" is the [[root cause]] of "[[suffering]]." The [[Fourth Noble Truth]] states that the practice of [[Shila]] ([[Ethics]]), [[Samadhi]]([[Effort]]), and [[Pragya]] ([[Wisdom]]) helps us eliminate [[craving]] and,thus,eliminate [[suffering]]. | + | The goal of [[Buddhism]] is to help alleviate [[human]] [[suffering]]. The [[Second Noble Truth]] states that "[[craving]]" is the [[root cause]] of "[[suffering]]." The [[Fourth Noble Truth]] states that the [[practice]] of [[Shila]] ([[Ethics]]), [[Samadhi]]([[Effort]]), and [[Pragya]] ([[Wisdom]]) helps us eliminate [[craving]] and,thus,eliminate [[suffering]]. |
The [[Wisdom]] aspect of the [[Buddhist Path]] deals with how we "see" or process [[information]]. [[Buddhist]] Masters-for over 2000 years-studied and [[debated]] the {{Wiki|epistemological}} aspect of [[life]]. Their sophisticated technique of ascertaining [[reality]] matches the recent developments in {{Wiki|Quantum Physics}}. They found that all [[worldly]] {{Wiki|processes}}, objects,and events have two modes of [[existence]]: the [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] mode and the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] mode. The [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] mode is the way of [[seeing]] when we filter [[information]] through the lens of our [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases. According to [[Buddhism]], we [[suffer]] because we often fail to see the "[[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]]" mode of [[existence]] of what is happening around us. | The [[Wisdom]] aspect of the [[Buddhist Path]] deals with how we "see" or process [[information]]. [[Buddhist]] Masters-for over 2000 years-studied and [[debated]] the {{Wiki|epistemological}} aspect of [[life]]. Their sophisticated technique of ascertaining [[reality]] matches the recent developments in {{Wiki|Quantum Physics}}. They found that all [[worldly]] {{Wiki|processes}}, objects,and events have two modes of [[existence]]: the [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] mode and the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] mode. The [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] mode is the way of [[seeing]] when we filter [[information]] through the lens of our [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases. According to [[Buddhism]], we [[suffer]] because we often fail to see the "[[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]]" mode of [[existence]] of what is happening around us. | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Charles {{Wiki|Darwin}} has provided an answer to the question above in his {{Wiki|theory}} of [[evolution]]. I was reading the [[book]] Ever Since {{Wiki|Darwin}}: Reflections in Natural History by one of my favorite authors {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}}. {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}} writes,"Darwin maintained that [[evolution]] has no [[direction]]: it does not lead inevitably to higher things. {{Wiki|Organism}} become better adapted to their local environments, and this is all. The "degeneracy" of a parasite is as {{Wiki|perfect}} as the gait of a gazelle." | Charles {{Wiki|Darwin}} has provided an answer to the question above in his {{Wiki|theory}} of [[evolution]]. I was reading the [[book]] Ever Since {{Wiki|Darwin}}: Reflections in Natural History by one of my favorite authors {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}}. {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}} writes,"Darwin maintained that [[evolution]] has no [[direction]]: it does not lead inevitably to higher things. {{Wiki|Organism}} become better adapted to their local environments, and this is all. The "degeneracy" of a parasite is as {{Wiki|perfect}} as the gait of a gazelle." | ||
− | The above counters a prevailing {{Wiki|misunderstanding}} about the {{Wiki|theory}} of [[evolution]] that it always takes us to a more refined state. | + | The above counters a prevailing {{Wiki|misunderstanding}} about the {{Wiki|theory}} of [[evolution]] that it always takes us to a more refined [[state]]. |
[[Nature]] helped us develop numerous "biases" to improve the chances of our survival. Our instinctive {{Wiki|fear}} of snakes(http:/www.sciencedaily.comreleases/2008/02/080227121840.htm) is one such example. When we come across something that looks like a {{Wiki|snake}}, we are afraid and we try to get away. When we are afraid, we do not stop to investigate if it is a rope in the dark or is it actually a {{Wiki|snake}}. Our survival depended upon such a "bias" because the [[world]] was full of {{Wiki|poisonous}} {{Wiki|snakes}}. | [[Nature]] helped us develop numerous "biases" to improve the chances of our survival. Our instinctive {{Wiki|fear}} of snakes(http:/www.sciencedaily.comreleases/2008/02/080227121840.htm) is one such example. When we come across something that looks like a {{Wiki|snake}}, we are afraid and we try to get away. When we are afraid, we do not stop to investigate if it is a rope in the dark or is it actually a {{Wiki|snake}}. Our survival depended upon such a "bias" because the [[world]] was full of {{Wiki|poisonous}} {{Wiki|snakes}}. | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
We are so deep in the [[world]] of [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases that we seldom notice them. They cloud our [[judgment]] and [[actions]] nevertheless. | We are so deep in the [[world]] of [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases that we seldom notice them. They cloud our [[judgment]] and [[actions]] nevertheless. | ||
− | As {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}} has written in his book,"It | + | As {{Wiki|Stephen Jay Gould}} has written in his book,"It([[evolution]]) does not lead inevitably to higher things." The evolutionary biases which helped us survive in the {{Wiki|past}}, may not be needed anymore; it appears that the process of [[evolution]] is not agile enough to adapt to the new [[reality]] of the [[world]]. |
One import of the above is, we share only part of the "blame" for carrying all the biases and [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]]. Another is, the struggle to get rid of the biases and [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] is going for at least 2500 years! Since the [[time]] of the [[Buddha]] in fact. | One import of the above is, we share only part of the "blame" for carrying all the biases and [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]]. Another is, the struggle to get rid of the biases and [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] is going for at least 2500 years! Since the [[time]] of the [[Buddha]] in fact. | ||
− | The [[First Noble Truth]] states that "Samsara,or the [[world]], is in a {{Wiki|pervasive}} state of [[suffering]]: [[suffering]] of [[sickness]], old age,and death,suffering of change, the {{Wiki|pervasive}} state of [[dissatisfaction]]." We can trace a lot of [[human]] [[suffering]], particularly the "the {{Wiki|pervasive}} state of [[dissatisfaction]]", to [[evolution]]. If only, the pace of [[evolution]] could keep pace with the advancement of the {{Wiki|modern}} [[world]]. | + | The [[First Noble Truth]] states that "[[Samsara]],or the [[world]], is in a {{Wiki|pervasive}} [[state]] of [[suffering]]: [[suffering]] of [[sickness]], old age,and death,suffering of change, the {{Wiki|pervasive}} [[state]] of [[dissatisfaction]]." We can trace a lot of [[human]] [[suffering]], particularly the "the {{Wiki|pervasive}} [[state]] of [[dissatisfaction]]", to [[evolution]]. If only, the pace of [[evolution]] could keep pace with the advancement of the {{Wiki|modern}} [[world]]. |
We need to be thankful to [[Buddhism]] that has provided us with the methods and tools that help us investigate and eliminate the [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases that prevent us from [[seeing]] the [[truth]]. Our [[happiness]] depends on us [[realizing]] this. | We need to be thankful to [[Buddhism]] that has provided us with the methods and tools that help us investigate and eliminate the [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and biases that prevent us from [[seeing]] the [[truth]]. Our [[happiness]] depends on us [[realizing]] this. |
Latest revision as of 09:18, 4 April 2016
The goal of Buddhism is to help alleviate human suffering. The Second Noble Truth states that "craving" is the root cause of "suffering." The Fourth Noble Truth states that the practice of Shila (Ethics), Samadhi(Effort), and Pragya (Wisdom) helps us eliminate craving and,thus,eliminate suffering.
The Wisdom aspect of the Buddhist Path deals with how we "see" or process information. Buddhist Masters-for over 2000 years-studied and debated the epistemological aspect of life. Their sophisticated technique of ascertaining reality matches the recent developments in Quantum Physics. They found that all worldly processes, objects,and events have two modes of existence: the conventional mode and the ultimate mode. The conventional mode is the way of seeing when we filter information through the lens of our concepts and biases. According to Buddhism, we suffer because we often fail to see the "ultimate" mode of existence of what is happening around us.
That brings us to the question: why do we have to be like this? Why did we develop the "filters" of concepts and biases.
Charles Darwin has provided an answer to the question above in his theory of evolution. I was reading the book Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History by one of my favorite authors Stephen Jay Gould. Stephen Jay Gould writes,"Darwin maintained that evolution has no direction: it does not lead inevitably to higher things. Organism become better adapted to their local environments, and this is all. The "degeneracy" of a parasite is as perfect as the gait of a gazelle."
The above counters a prevailing misunderstanding about the theory of evolution that it always takes us to a more refined state.
Nature helped us develop numerous "biases" to improve the chances of our survival. Our instinctive fear of snakes(http:/www.sciencedaily.comreleases/2008/02/080227121840.htm) is one such example. When we come across something that looks like a snake, we are afraid and we try to get away. When we are afraid, we do not stop to investigate if it is a rope in the dark or is it actually a snake. Our survival depended upon such a "bias" because the world was full of poisonous snakes.
Fear of strangers that often devolves into racism is another example of nature's evolution. A few thousand years ago,if we came across something that we had never seen before, we had to be afraid. That "strange" thing could kill us.
We are so deep in the world of concepts and biases that we seldom notice them. They cloud our judgment and actions nevertheless.
As Stephen Jay Gould has written in his book,"It(evolution) does not lead inevitably to higher things." The evolutionary biases which helped us survive in the past, may not be needed anymore; it appears that the process of evolution is not agile enough to adapt to the new reality of the world.
One import of the above is, we share only part of the "blame" for carrying all the biases and concepts. Another is, the struggle to get rid of the biases and concepts is going for at least 2500 years! Since the time of the Buddha in fact.
The First Noble Truth states that "Samsara,or the world, is in a pervasive state of suffering: suffering of sickness, old age,and death,suffering of change, the pervasive state of dissatisfaction." We can trace a lot of human suffering, particularly the "the pervasive state of dissatisfaction", to evolution. If only, the pace of evolution could keep pace with the advancement of the modern world.
We need to be thankful to Buddhism that has provided us with the methods and tools that help us investigate and eliminate the concepts and biases that prevent us from seeing the truth. Our happiness depends on us realizing this.