Difference between revisions of "Thera-Theri Gatha: Inspired utterances of Buddhist monks and nuns"
(Created page with "GATHA: Thera - Theri Gatha belongs to the Khuddaka Nikaya of the Sutta Pitaka in the Pali Canon. The Pali term khuddaka has been defined as 'minor', but it should not be under...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | GATHA: Thera - Theri Gatha belongs to the Khuddaka Nikaya of the Sutta Pitaka in the Pali Canon. The Pali term khuddaka has been defined as 'minor', but it should not be understood as 'insignificant' or 'unimportant'. | + | GATHA: [[Thera]] - [[Theri]] [[Gatha]] belongs to the [[Khuddaka Nikaya]] of the [[Sutta Pitaka]] in the [[Pali Canon]]. The [[Pali]] term [[khuddaka]] has been defined as 'minor', but it should not be understood as 'insignificant' or 'unimportant'. |
− | The Khuddaka Nikayawas probably considered as 'minor' in relation to the actual teaching in the other texts in the Pali Canon. As Prof. Oliver Abeynayake observes: "It is in fact an integral part of the great tradition." | + | The [[Khuddaka]] Nikayawas probably considered as 'minor' in [[relation]] to the actual [[teaching]] in the other texts in the [[Pali Canon]]. As Prof. Oliver Abeynayake observes: "It is in fact an integral part of the great [[tradition]]." |
− | Even a cursory glance at the Thera-Theri Gatha will convince a reader that these theras and theris had been a group of people disciplined by a mainstream philosophy and culture whose utterances cannot be considered 'minor' in the usual sense of the term. | + | Even a cursory glance at the Thera-Theri [[Gatha]] will convince a reader that these [[theras]] and [[theris]] had been a group of [[people]] [[disciplined]] by a {{Wiki|mainstream}} [[philosophy]] and {{Wiki|culture}} whose utterances cannot be considered 'minor' in the usual [[sense]] of the term. |
[[File:SL Monk.jpg|thumb|350px|]] | [[File:SL Monk.jpg|thumb|350px|]] | ||
− | Thera-Theri Gatha come to us in verse-form because they were passed on in the oral tradition as such. It is a feature in the Pali Canon that in certain places profound concepts of the Dhamma are explained with simple similes, emotive language, striking phrases and a narrative style mixed up with prose and poetry. | + | Thera-Theri [[Gatha]] come to us in verse-form because they were passed on in the [[oral tradition]] as such. It is a feature in the [[Pali Canon]] that in certain places profound [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] of the [[Dhamma]] are explained with simple similes, {{Wiki|emotive}} [[language]], striking phrases and a {{Wiki|narrative}} style mixed up with prose and [[poetry]]. |
− | Moreover, although Buddhism grew amidst an atmosphere of considerable intellectual activity, writing was not used to record its products, and the tendency was to convert all utterances that were deemed important into metrical form. | + | Moreover, although [[Buddhism]] grew amidst an {{Wiki|atmosphere}} of considerable [[intellectual]] [[activity]], [[writing]] was not used to record its products, and the tendency was to convert all utterances that were deemed important into metrical [[form]]. |
− | According to Rhys Davids, canonical books were the result rather of communistic than of individual effort. Similarly, even in the Thera-Theri Gatha there is internal evidence that reveals the hand of the invisible compiler such as the presence of duplicate names in the text, ascription of identical stanzas to separate theras and the repetition of stanzas. | + | According to {{Wiki|Rhys Davids}}, [[Wikipedia:canonical|canonical]] [[books]] were the result rather of communistic than of {{Wiki|individual}} [[effort]]. Similarly, even in the Thera-Theri [[Gatha]] there is internal {{Wiki|evidence}} that reveals the hand of the {{Wiki|invisible}} compiler such as the presence of duplicate names in the text, ascription of [[identical]] [[stanzas]] to separate [[theras]] and the repetition of [[stanzas]]. |
− | Moreover, some of the writings now found in the Dhammapada, Thera Gatha and Theri Gatha had been scattered over the Nikayas before they were finally incorporated in the present texts by the learned compilers. | + | Moreover, some of the writings now found in the [[Dhammapada]], [[Thera]] [[Gatha]] and [[Theri]] [[Gatha]] had been scattered over the [[Nikayas]] before they were finally incorporated in the {{Wiki|present}} texts by the learned compilers. |
− | Scholars conclude that the verses collected in the Thera Gatha and Theri Gatha were uttered over a period of 300 years, from the end of the sixth century to the middle of the third century BC. | + | [[Scholars]] conclude that the verses collected in the [[Thera]] [[Gatha]] and [[Theri]] [[Gatha]] were uttered over a period of 300 years, from the end of the sixth century to the middle of the third century BC. |
− | During these centuries Gathas were probably added onto the original stock or underwent alteration. A selection and revision were done at the Third Council in pataliputta, and it is this version that has come down to us. | + | During these centuries [[Gathas]] were probably added onto the original stock or underwent [[alteration]]. A selection and revision were done at the [[Third Council]] in [[pataliputta]], and it is this version that has come down to us. |
− | Some gathas, of course, suggest that they come to us almost in the form they were uttered, while others reveal the hand of a compiler or a literary composer. Mrs. Rhys Davids points out that the verses of TheriSumedha and Theri Isidasi show unmistakable signs of literary craft. | + | Some [[gathas]], of course, suggest that they come to us almost in the [[form]] they were uttered, while others reveal the hand of a compiler or a {{Wiki|literary}} composer. Mrs. {{Wiki|Rhys Davids}} points out that the verses of TheriSumedha and [[Theri]] [[Isidasi]] show unmistakable [[signs]] of {{Wiki|literary}} craft. |
− | This kind of compilation or revision is to be expected in a body of literature that was passed on mainly by oral tradition. But this should not mean that was passed on mainly by oral tradition. | + | This kind of compilation or revision is to be expected in a [[body]] of {{Wiki|literature}} that was passed on mainly by [[oral tradition]]. But this should not mean that was passed on mainly by [[oral tradition]]. |
− | But this should not mean that these utterances were never made by the theras or theris concerned and were the compositions of some others. In fact, nothing can be further from the truth. | + | But this should not mean that these utterances were never made by the [[theras]] or [[theris]] concerned and were the compositions of some others. In fact, nothing can be further from the [[truth]]. |
− | The importance and relevance of this body of literature lie not in who uttered them but in the utterances themselves. In the words of Mrs. Rhys Davids: ".... these are for the history of human ideas the really precious truths, however legendary or lost the genuine sources may have become". It is in this sense, I believe, that these verses should be read and understood. | + | The importance and relevance of this [[body]] of {{Wiki|literature}} lie not in who uttered them but in the utterances themselves. In the words of Mrs. {{Wiki|Rhys Davids}}: ".... these are for the history of [[human]] [[ideas]] the really [[precious]] [[truths]], however legendary or lost the genuine sources may have become". It is in this [[sense]], I believe, that these verses should be read and understood. |
− | Thera-Theri Gatha have also been called sravakaudanas. Dhammapala in his Commentary on the Udana defines it as an "accumulated thrill wave of strong emotion, of thought directed and diffused (itakkavippahara), which the heart cannot contain, when it grows to excess cannot stay within, but bursts forth by way of the door of speech, regardless of who receives it - in fact an extraordinary expiration - that is called "udana". | + | Thera-Theri [[Gatha]] have also been called sravakaudanas. [[Dhammapala]] in his Commentary on the [[Udana]] defines it as an "[[accumulated]] thrill wave of strong [[emotion]], of [[thought]] directed and diffused (itakkavippahara), which the [[heart]] cannot contain, when it grows to excess cannot stay within, but bursts forth by way of the door of {{Wiki|speech}}, regardless of who receives it - in fact an [[extraordinary]] expiration - that is called "[[udana]]". |
− | Udana is obviously a religious emotion (dhamma samvega) but scholars define it in several ways. Winternitz renders it as a 'pithy saying'. Woodward as 'verses of uplift', and Jayawickrema as 'utterances of joy'. | + | [[Udana]] is obviously a [[religious]] [[emotion]] ([[dhamma]] [[samvega]]) but [[scholars]] define it in several ways. Winternitz renders it as a 'pithy saying'. Woodward as '[[verses of uplift]]', and Jayawickrema as 'utterances of [[joy]]'. |
− | But, to my mind the most revealing definition has been given by Mrs. Rhys Davids when she says: "By whomsoever compiled, the contents of the Psalms are profoundly and perennially interesting as expressions of the religious mind, universal and unconquerable; a mind which is so intensely alive." | + | But, to my [[mind]] the most revealing [[definition]] has been given by Mrs. {{Wiki|Rhys Davids}} when she says: "By whomsoever compiled, the contents of the Psalms are profoundly and perennially [[interesting]] as {{Wiki|expressions}} of the [[religious]] [[mind]], [[universal]] and unconquerable; a [[mind]] which is so intensely alive." |
− | It is this quality of the mind being alive that renders the verse their unique expressive beauty. And it is only a mind that is intensely alive that will experience the present moment. | + | It is this quality of the [[mind]] being alive that renders the verse their unique expressive [[beauty]]. And it is only a [[mind]] that is intensely alive that will [[experience]] the {{Wiki|present}} [[moment]]. |
− | Apart from the profound thoughts expressed are evaluated as excellent specimens of poetry. Winternitz refers to them as "religious poems which, in force and beauty, are fit to rank with the best production of Indian lyric poetry, from the hymns of the Rgveda to the lyrical poems of Kalidasa and Amaru." | + | Apart from the profound [[thoughts]] expressed are evaluated as {{Wiki|excellent}} specimens of [[poetry]]. Winternitz refers to them as "[[religious]] poems which, in force and [[beauty]], are fit to rank with the best production of [[Indian]] lyric [[poetry]], from the hymns of the {{Wiki|Rgveda}} to the lyrical poems of [[Wikipedia:Kālidāsa|Kalidasa]] and Amaru." |
− | Mrs. Rhys Davids considers some verses as word-music and claims that "we may place (them) without hesitation beside any passage of Keats and Shelly." | + | Mrs. {{Wiki|Rhys Davids}} considers some verses as word-music and claims that "we may place (them) without hesitation beside any passage of Keats and Shelly." |
− | Martin Wickremasinghe sees them as good poetry and says that "it is sensibility guided by intellect that responds to the truth as differently perceived by the saint and the poet." In fact, he says that the Sinhala poets should have sought inspiration from them rather than from Sanskrit poetry. | + | Martin Wickremasinghe sees them as good [[poetry]] and says that "it is {{Wiki|sensibility}} guided by {{Wiki|intellect}} that responds to the [[truth]] as differently [[perceived]] by the [[saint]] and the poet." In fact, he says that the [[Sinhala]] poets should have sought inspiration from them rather than from [[Sanskrit]] [[poetry]]. |
− | However, Ven. Karahampitigoda Sumanasara, who translated the Thera-Theri Gatha into Sinhala, strikes a discordant note. According to him, the world-view of the theras and the poets was far apart. He argues that Thera Culaka's gatha or Thera Suppaka's gatha reveal that what is interpreted as beauty by a poet inspired the theras to meditation. | + | However, Ven. Karahampitigoda Sumanasara, who translated the Thera-Theri [[Gatha]] into [[Sinhala]], strikes a discordant note. According to him, the world-view of the [[theras]] and the poets was far apart. He argues that [[Thera]] Culaka's [[gatha]] or [[Thera]] Suppaka's [[gatha]] reveal that what is interpreted as [[beauty]] by a poet inspired the [[theras]] to [[meditation]]. |
− | He adds: "So the peacocks, their singing, green grasslands, flowing streams and cloud-covered skies evoke in Thera Culaka not a 'worldly' emotion but an inclination to meditate. Thus, the thera and the poet viewed the same world with different eyes. | + | He adds: "So the [[peacocks]], their singing, green grasslands, flowing streams and cloud-covered skies evoke in [[Thera]] Culaka not a '[[worldly]]' [[emotion]] but an inclination to [[meditate]]. Thus, the [[thera]] and the poet viewed the same [[world]] with different [[eyes]]. |
− | Ven. Sumanasara's argument is valid in the sense that although most of the theras are enthralled by nature, and speak enchantingly of mountains, flowing streams, singing peacocks, green grasslands, cool breezes and so on their minds respond to these external stimuli in an entirely different way from those of ordinary human beings. | + | Ven. Sumanasara's argument is valid in the [[sense]] that although most of the [[theras]] are enthralled by [[nature]], and speak enchantingly of [[mountains]], flowing streams, singing [[peacocks]], green grasslands, cool breezes and so on their [[minds]] respond to these external {{Wiki|stimuli}} in an entirely different way from those of ordinary [[human beings]]. |
− | As Ven. Sumanasara rightly points out, the theras see in nature not 'pleasure' in the sense that we understand the term, but inner peace, 'oneness' with nature, something far removed from personal attachment or feeling. | + | As Ven. Sumanasara rightly points out, the [[theras]] see in [[nature]] not '[[pleasure]]' in the [[sense]] that we understand the term, but [[inner peace]], '[[oneness]]' with [[nature]], something far removed from personal [[attachment]] or [[feeling]]. |
− | The point that when the theras or the theris uttered these sentiments they were not thinking in terms of poetry or expressing ordinary emotion need not be stressed. | + | The point that when the [[theras]] or the [[theris]] uttered these sentiments they were not [[thinking]] in terms of [[poetry]] or expressing ordinary [[emotion]] need not be stressed. |
− | As an example Thera | + | As an example [[Thera]] |
Talaputa's verses may be cited: | Talaputa's verses may be cited: | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | ::When will the rain cloud | + | ::When will the [[rain]] cloud |
− | ::In the rainy season | + | ::In the [[rainy season]] |
− | ::Rain upon me and my robes | + | ::[[Rain]] upon me and my [[robes]] |
− | ::with fresh water | + | ::with fresh [[water]] |
− | ::As I follow this forest path | + | ::As I follow this {{Wiki|forest}} [[path]] |
− | ::taken by the sages? | + | ::taken by the [[sages]]? |
::When will this wish of mine | ::When will this wish of mine | ||
::be fulfilled? | ::be fulfilled? | ||
− | ::To the call of the peacock | + | ::To the call of the [[peacock]] |
− | ::in this forest | + | ::in this {{Wiki|forest}} |
− | ::And meditate on the | + | ::And [[meditate]] on the |
− | ::impermanence of things? | + | ::[[impermanence]] of things? |
::When will this wish of | ::When will this wish of | ||
::mine be fulfilled | ::mine be fulfilled | ||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | Here the thera is inspired by Nature to nobler contemplation than mere delight. If this is poetry, it is poetry in the Aristotlean sense, which is that the end purpose of poetry is not stimulation but purging of emotions. The entire verse comes as a dialogue between the thera and his own mind, battling against sensual pleasures. Addressing the mind, he says: | + | Here the [[thera]] is inspired by [[Nature]] to nobler contemplation than mere [[delight]]. If this is [[poetry]], it is [[poetry]] in the Aristotlean [[sense]], which is that the end {{Wiki|purpose}} of [[poetry]] is not {{Wiki|stimulation}} but purging of [[emotions]]. The entire verse comes as a {{Wiki|dialogue}} between the [[thera]] and his [[own]] [[mind]], battling against [[sensual pleasures]]. Addressing the [[mind]], he says: |
<poem> | <poem> | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
::The grass is four fingers high | ::The grass is four fingers high | ||
::When the grove is in full | ::When the grove is in full | ||
− | ::flower like rain clouds | + | ::[[flower]] like [[rain]] clouds |
− | ::Like a tree I will lie | + | ::Like a [[tree]] I will lie |
− | ::Among the mountains | + | ::Among the [[mountains]] |
::And the carpet of grass | ::And the carpet of grass | ||
::will console me | ::will console me | ||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | Following is a sample of an inspired utterance by Thera Upasena. | + | Following is a sample of an [[inspired utterance]] by [[Thera]] [[Upasena]]. |
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | ::The monk | + | ::The [[monk]] |
::In search of privacy | ::In search of privacy | ||
− | ::Shall prefer the forest dwelling, | + | ::Shall prefer the {{Wiki|forest}} dwelling, |
::Uninhabited, quiet | ::Uninhabited, quiet | ||
− | ::And sought by wild animals | + | ::And sought by wild [[animals]] |
− | ::He shall wear his robes | + | ::He shall wear his [[robes]] |
::Sewn from rags | ::Sewn from rags | ||
::Picked up from dust-heaps, | ::Picked up from dust-heaps, | ||
− | ::The cemetery and the street | + | ::The [[cemetery]] and the street |
− | ::With sense-doors well guarded | + | ::With [[sense-doors]] well guarded |
− | ::And pride subdued | + | ::And [[pride]] subdued |
::From house to house he shall go | ::From house to house he shall go | ||
− | ::Begging his alms | + | ::Begging his [[alms]] |
::Content he shall be | ::Content he shall be | ||
− | ::even with coarse food | + | ::even with coarse [[food]] |
− | ::Nor shall he be greedy; | + | ::Nor shall he be [[greedy]]; |
− | ::For the mind of him | + | ::For the [[mind]] of him |
− | ::who is greedy | + | ::who is [[greedy]] |
− | ::Will not be inclined to meditation | + | ::Will not be inclined to [[meditation]] |
− | ::Desiring little | + | ::[[Desiring]] little |
::He'll be content with | ::He'll be content with | ||
::what he gets | ::what he gets | ||
− | ::And live in tranquillity, | + | ::And live in [[tranquillity]], |
::Alone and apart | ::Alone and apart | ||
− | ::Amidst the assembly of monks | + | ::Amidst the assembly of [[monks]] |
− | ::The learned monk will keep | + | ::The learned [[monk]] will keep |
::A low profile | ::A low profile | ||
::Speak he will not | ::Speak he will not | ||
::More than necessary | ::More than necessary | ||
::He will not reproach | ::He will not reproach | ||
− | ::Nor hurt anyone | + | ::Nor {{Wiki|hurt}} anyone |
− | ::Disciplined by the observances | + | ::[[Disciplined]] by the observances |
::Of patimokka | ::Of patimokka | ||
− | ::He will be temperate in food | + | ::He will be temperate in [[food]] |
− | ::Well-versed in concentration | + | ::Well-versed in [[concentration]] |
::He will understand the | ::He will understand the | ||
− | ::origin of the mind; | + | ::origin of the [[mind]]; |
− | ::In proper time | + | ::In proper [[time]] |
− | ::He will engage in meditation | + | ::He will engage in [[meditation]] |
− | ::Of tranquillity and of perception | + | ::Of [[tranquillity]] and of [[perception]] |
::Persisting, | ::Persisting, | ||
::Rest he will not | ::Rest he will not | ||
− | ::Until he had gained Nibbana | + | ::Until he had gained [[Nibbana]] |
::Living thus, | ::Living thus, | ||
− | ::All his desires will fade out | + | ::All his [[desires]] will fade out |
::And come to an end. | ::And come to an end. | ||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | (The English translation of the gathas quoted here are by the writer) | + | (The English translation of the [[gathas]] quoted here are by the writer) |
− | {{R}}[http://www.lakehouse.lk/mihintalava/buddhism05.htm] | + | {{R}} |
+ | [http://www.lakehouse.lk/mihintalava/buddhism05.htm lakehouse.lk] | ||
[[Category:Theravada Buddhism]] | [[Category:Theravada Buddhism]] | ||
[[Category:Sutras]] | [[Category:Sutras]] |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 24 February 2015
GATHA: Thera - Theri Gatha belongs to the Khuddaka Nikaya of the Sutta Pitaka in the Pali Canon. The Pali term khuddaka has been defined as 'minor', but it should not be understood as 'insignificant' or 'unimportant'. The Khuddaka Nikayawas probably considered as 'minor' in relation to the actual teaching in the other texts in the Pali Canon. As Prof. Oliver Abeynayake observes: "It is in fact an integral part of the great tradition." Even a cursory glance at the Thera-Theri Gatha will convince a reader that these theras and theris had been a group of people disciplined by a mainstream philosophy and culture whose utterances cannot be considered 'minor' in the usual sense of the term.
Thera-Theri Gatha come to us in verse-form because they were passed on in the oral tradition as such. It is a feature in the Pali Canon that in certain places profound concepts of the Dhamma are explained with simple similes, emotive language, striking phrases and a narrative style mixed up with prose and poetry.
Moreover, although Buddhism grew amidst an atmosphere of considerable intellectual activity, writing was not used to record its products, and the tendency was to convert all utterances that were deemed important into metrical form. According to Rhys Davids, canonical books were the result rather of communistic than of individual effort. Similarly, even in the Thera-Theri Gatha there is internal evidence that reveals the hand of the invisible compiler such as the presence of duplicate names in the text, ascription of identical stanzas to separate theras and the repetition of stanzas. Moreover, some of the writings now found in the Dhammapada, Thera Gatha and Theri Gatha had been scattered over the Nikayas before they were finally incorporated in the present texts by the learned compilers.
Scholars conclude that the verses collected in the Thera Gatha and Theri Gatha were uttered over a period of 300 years, from the end of the sixth century to the middle of the third century BC. During these centuries Gathas were probably added onto the original stock or underwent alteration. A selection and revision were done at the Third Council in pataliputta, and it is this version that has come down to us. Some gathas, of course, suggest that they come to us almost in the form they were uttered, while others reveal the hand of a compiler or a literary composer. Mrs. Rhys Davids points out that the verses of TheriSumedha and Theri Isidasi show unmistakable signs of literary craft.
This kind of compilation or revision is to be expected in a body of literature that was passed on mainly by oral tradition. But this should not mean that was passed on mainly by oral tradition. But this should not mean that these utterances were never made by the theras or theris concerned and were the compositions of some others. In fact, nothing can be further from the truth.
The importance and relevance of this body of literature lie not in who uttered them but in the utterances themselves. In the words of Mrs. Rhys Davids: ".... these are for the history of human ideas the really precious truths, however legendary or lost the genuine sources may have become". It is in this sense, I believe, that these verses should be read and understood. Thera-Theri Gatha have also been called sravakaudanas. Dhammapala in his Commentary on the Udana defines it as an "accumulated thrill wave of strong emotion, of thought directed and diffused (itakkavippahara), which the heart cannot contain, when it grows to excess cannot stay within, but bursts forth by way of the door of speech, regardless of who receives it - in fact an extraordinary expiration - that is called "udana".
Udana is obviously a religious emotion (dhamma samvega) but scholars define it in several ways. Winternitz renders it as a 'pithy saying'. Woodward as 'verses of uplift', and Jayawickrema as 'utterances of joy'. But, to my mind the most revealing definition has been given by Mrs. Rhys Davids when she says: "By whomsoever compiled, the contents of the Psalms are profoundly and perennially interesting as expressions of the religious mind, universal and unconquerable; a mind which is so intensely alive."
It is this quality of the mind being alive that renders the verse their unique expressive beauty. And it is only a mind that is intensely alive that will experience the present moment. Apart from the profound thoughts expressed are evaluated as excellent specimens of poetry. Winternitz refers to them as "religious poems which, in force and beauty, are fit to rank with the best production of Indian lyric poetry, from the hymns of the Rgveda to the lyrical poems of Kalidasa and Amaru."
Mrs. Rhys Davids considers some verses as word-music and claims that "we may place (them) without hesitation beside any passage of Keats and Shelly." Martin Wickremasinghe sees them as good poetry and says that "it is sensibility guided by intellect that responds to the truth as differently perceived by the saint and the poet." In fact, he says that the Sinhala poets should have sought inspiration from them rather than from Sanskrit poetry.
However, Ven. Karahampitigoda Sumanasara, who translated the Thera-Theri Gatha into Sinhala, strikes a discordant note. According to him, the world-view of the theras and the poets was far apart. He argues that Thera Culaka's gatha or Thera Suppaka's gatha reveal that what is interpreted as beauty by a poet inspired the theras to meditation.
He adds: "So the peacocks, their singing, green grasslands, flowing streams and cloud-covered skies evoke in Thera Culaka not a 'worldly' emotion but an inclination to meditate. Thus, the thera and the poet viewed the same world with different eyes. Ven. Sumanasara's argument is valid in the sense that although most of the theras are enthralled by nature, and speak enchantingly of mountains, flowing streams, singing peacocks, green grasslands, cool breezes and so on their minds respond to these external stimuli in an entirely different way from those of ordinary human beings.
As Ven. Sumanasara rightly points out, the theras see in nature not 'pleasure' in the sense that we understand the term, but inner peace, 'oneness' with nature, something far removed from personal attachment or feeling. The point that when the theras or the theris uttered these sentiments they were not thinking in terms of poetry or expressing ordinary emotion need not be stressed.
As an example Thera Talaputa's verses may be cited:
When will the rain cloud
In the rainy season
Rain upon me and my robes
with fresh water
As I follow this forest path
taken by the sages?
When will this wish of mine
be fulfilled?
To the call of the peacock
in this forest
And meditate on the
impermanence of things?
When will this wish of
mine be fulfilled
Here the thera is inspired by Nature to nobler contemplation than mere delight. If this is poetry, it is poetry in the Aristotlean sense, which is that the end purpose of poetry is not stimulation but purging of emotions. The entire verse comes as a dialogue between the thera and his own mind, battling against sensual pleasures. Addressing the mind, he says:
When after the rains
The grass is four fingers high
When the grove is in full
flower like rain clouds
Like a tree I will lie
Among the mountains
And the carpet of grass
will console me
Following is a sample of an inspired utterance by Thera Upasena.
The monk
In search of privacy
Shall prefer the forest dwelling,
Uninhabited, quiet
And sought by wild animals
He shall wear his robes
Sewn from rags
Picked up from dust-heaps,
The cemetery and the street
With sense-doors well guarded
And pride subdued
From house to house he shall go
Begging his alms
Content he shall be
even with coarse food
Nor shall he be greedy;
For the mind of him
who is greedy
Will not be inclined to meditation
Desiring little
He'll be content with
what he gets
And live in tranquillity,
Alone and apart
Amidst the assembly of monks
The learned monk will keep
A low profile
Speak he will not
More than necessary
He will not reproach
Nor hurt anyone
Disciplined by the observances
Of patimokka
He will be temperate in food
Well-versed in concentration
He will understand the
origin of the mind;
In proper time
He will engage in meditation
Of tranquillity and of perception
Persisting,
Rest he will not
Until he had gained Nibbana
Living thus,
All his desires will fade out
And come to an end.
(The English translation of the gathas quoted here are by the writer)