Difference between revisions of "Ajita Kesakambala"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Manjusri-2.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:Manjusri-2.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | '''Ajita Kesakambala''' | + | '''[[Ajita Kesakambala]]''' |
− | [阿耆多翅舎欽婆羅] (Pali; Jpn Agita-shishakim-bara) | + | [[阿耆多翅舎欽婆羅]] ([[Pali]]; Jpn [[Agita-shishakim-bara]]) |
− | An influential non-[[Buddhist]] thinker during [[Shakyamuni]]'s time. | + | An influential non-[[Buddhist]] thinker during [[Shakyamuni]]'s [[time]]. |
− | See six non-Buddhist teachers. | + | See six [[non-Buddhist]] [[teachers]]. |
− | '''Ajita Kesakambali''' (Chinese: 無勝髮褐; pinyin: Wúshèng Fàhè) was an ancient Indian [[philosopher]] in the 6th century BC. He is considered to be the first known proponent of Indian [[Wikipedia:materialism|materialism]]. He was probably a contemporary of [[Buddha]] and [[Wikipedia:Mahāvīra|Mahavira]]. It has frequently been noted that the [[doctrines]] of the [[Wikipedia:Cārvāka|Lokayata]] school were considerably drawn from [[Ajita]]'s teachings. Like those of Lokayatins, nothing survives of his teachings in script, except some scattered references made by his opponents for the sake of refutation. Thus, due to the nature of these references, the basic framework of [[Ajita]]'s [[philosophy]] has to be derived by filtering out obscure legends associated with him. For instance, according to a [[Buddhist]] legend, he wore a blanket of human hair (Kesakambali in [[Sanskrit]] means "with the hair blanket"), "which is described as being the most miserable garment. It was cold in cold weather, and hot in the hot, foul smelling and uncouth". | + | '''[[Ajita Kesakambali]]''' ({{Wiki|Chinese}}: [[無勝髮褐]]; pinyin: Wúshèng Fàhè) was an {{Wiki|ancient}} [[Indian]] [[philosopher]] in the 6th century BC. He is considered to be the first known proponent of [[Indian]] [[Wikipedia:materialism|materialism]]. He was probably a contemporary of [[Buddha]] and [[Wikipedia:Mahāvīra|Mahavira]]. It has frequently been noted that the [[doctrines]] of the [[Wikipedia:Cārvāka|Lokayata]] school were considerably drawn from [[Ajita]]'s teachings. Like those of Lokayatins, [[nothing]] survives of his teachings in [[script]], except some scattered references made by his opponents for the [[sake]] of refutation. Thus, due to the {{Wiki|nature}} of these references, the basic framework of [[Ajita]]'s [[philosophy]] has to be derived by filtering out obscure {{Wiki|legends}} associated with him. For instance, according to a [[Buddhist]] legend, he wore a blanket of [[human]] [[hair]] ([[Wikipedia:Ajita Kesakambali|Kesakambali]] in [[Sanskrit]] means "with the [[hair]] blanket"), "which is described as [[being]] the most [[miserable]] garment. It was cold in cold weather, and [[hot]] in the [[hot]], foul {{Wiki|smelling}} and uncouth". |
− | Renowned historian DD Kosambi, who elsewhere calls [[Ajita]] a [[proto-materialist]], notes that he "preached a thoroughgoing materialist [[doctrine]]: good deeds and charity gained a man nothing in the end. His body dissolved into the primary elements at [[death]], no matter what he had or had not done. Nothing remained. Good and evil, charity and [[compassion]] were all irrelevant to a man's fate." According to an early [[Buddhist]] source, [[Ajita Kesakambali]] argued that: | + | Renowned historian DD [[Kosambi]], who elsewhere calls [[Ajita]] a [[proto-materialist]], notes that he "{{Wiki|preached}} a thoroughgoing {{Wiki|materialist}} [[doctrine]]: [[good deeds]] and [[charity]] gained a man [[nothing]] in the end. His [[body]] dissolved into the [[primary]] [[elements]] at [[death]], no [[matter]] what he had or had not done. [[Nothing]] remained. Good and [[evil]], [[charity]] and [[compassion]] were all irrelevant to a man's [[fate]]." According to an early [[Buddhist]] source, [[Ajita Kesakambali]] argued that: |
− | There is no such thing as alms or [[Wikipedia:sacrifice |sacrifice]] or [[offering]]. There is neither fruit nor result of good or [[evil]] deeds...A human being is built up of [[four elements]]. When he dies the earthly in him returns and relapses to the [[earth]], the fluid to the water, the heat to the [[fire]], the [[wind]] to the [[air]], and his faculties pass into [[Wikipedia:space|space]]. The four bearers, on the bier as a fifth, take his dead body away; till they reach the burning ground, men utter forth eulogies, but there his bones are bleached, and his offerings end in ashes. It is a [[doctrine]] of fools, this talk of gifts. It is an empty lie, mere idle talk, when men say there is profit herein. Fools and wise alike, on the dissolution of the body, are cut off, annihilated, and after [[death]] they are not. | + | There is no such thing as [[alms]] or [[Wikipedia:sacrifice |sacrifice]] or [[offering]]. There is neither fruit nor result of good or [[evil]] deeds...A [[human being]] is built up of [[four elements]]. When he [[dies]] the [[earthly]] in him returns and relapses to the [[earth]], the fluid to the [[water]], the {{Wiki|heat}} to the [[fire]], the [[wind]] to the [[air]], and his [[faculties]] pass into [[Wikipedia:space|space]]. The four bearers, on the bier as a fifth, take his [[dead]] [[body]] away; till they reach the burning ground, men utter forth eulogies, but there his {{Wiki|bones}} are bleached, and his [[offerings]] end in ashes. It is a [[doctrine]] of fools, this talk of gifts. It is an [[empty]] lie, mere idle talk, when men say there is profit herein. Fools and [[wise]] alike, on the [[dissolution]] of the [[body]], are cut off, {{Wiki|annihilated}}, and after [[death]] they are not. |
− | According to [[Brahmajala Sutta]], [[Ajita]] propounded [[Ucchedavada]] (the Doctrine of [[Wikipedia:Annihilation |Annihilation]] after [[death]]) and Tam-Jivam-tam-sariram-vada (the [[doctrine]] of identity of the [[Wikipedia:soul|soul]] and [[body]]), which denied the separate existence of eternal [[Wikipedia:soul|soul]]. The extent to which these [[doctrines]], which were evidently inherited by [[Wikipedia:Cārvāka |Lokayata]], were found contemptible and necessary to be refuted in the idealist, theist and [[religious]] literature of the time is a possible evidence of their popularity and, perhaps also, their [[philosophical]] sophistication. | + | According to [[Brahmajala Sutta]], [[Ajita]] propounded [[Ucchedavada]] (the [[Doctrine]] of [[Wikipedia:Annihilation |Annihilation]] after [[death]]) and Tam-Jivam-tam-sariram-vada (the [[doctrine]] of [[Wikipedia:Identity (philosophy)|identity]] of the [[Wikipedia:soul|soul]] and [[body]]), which denied the separate [[existence]] of [[eternal]] [[Wikipedia:soul|soul]]. The extent to which these [[doctrines]], which were evidently inherited by [[Wikipedia:Cārvāka |Lokayata]], were found contemptible and necessary to be refuted in the {{Wiki|idealist}}, {{Wiki|theist}} and [[religious]] {{Wiki|literature}} of the [[time]] is a possible {{Wiki|evidence}} of their [[popularity]] and, perhaps also, their [[philosophical]] {{Wiki|sophistication}}. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{R}} | {{R}} |
Latest revision as of 09:34, 30 January 2024
Ajita Kesakambala
阿耆多翅舎欽婆羅 (Pali; Jpn Agita-shishakim-bara)
An influential non-Buddhist thinker during Shakyamuni's time.
See six non-Buddhist teachers.
Ajita Kesakambali (Chinese: 無勝髮褐; pinyin: Wúshèng Fàhè) was an ancient Indian philosopher in the 6th century BC. He is considered to be the first known proponent of Indian materialism. He was probably a contemporary of Buddha and Mahavira. It has frequently been noted that the doctrines of the Lokayata school were considerably drawn from Ajita's teachings. Like those of Lokayatins, nothing survives of his teachings in script, except some scattered references made by his opponents for the sake of refutation. Thus, due to the nature of these references, the basic framework of Ajita's philosophy has to be derived by filtering out obscure legends associated with him. For instance, according to a Buddhist legend, he wore a blanket of human hair (Kesakambali in Sanskrit means "with the hair blanket"), "which is described as being the most miserable garment. It was cold in cold weather, and hot in the hot, foul smelling and uncouth".
Renowned historian DD Kosambi, who elsewhere calls Ajita a proto-materialist, notes that he "preached a thoroughgoing materialist doctrine: good deeds and charity gained a man nothing in the end. His body dissolved into the primary elements at death, no matter what he had or had not done. Nothing remained. Good and evil, charity and compassion were all irrelevant to a man's fate." According to an early Buddhist source, Ajita Kesakambali argued that:
There is no such thing as alms or sacrifice or offering. There is neither fruit nor result of good or evil deeds...A human being is built up of four elements. When he dies the earthly in him returns and relapses to the earth, the fluid to the water, the heat to the fire, the wind to the air, and his faculties pass into space. The four bearers, on the bier as a fifth, take his dead body away; till they reach the burning ground, men utter forth eulogies, but there his bones are bleached, and his offerings end in ashes. It is a doctrine of fools, this talk of gifts. It is an empty lie, mere idle talk, when men say there is profit herein. Fools and wise alike, on the dissolution of the body, are cut off, annihilated, and after death they are not.
According to Brahmajala Sutta, Ajita propounded Ucchedavada (the Doctrine of Annihilation after death) and Tam-Jivam-tam-sariram-vada (the doctrine of identity of the soul and body), which denied the separate existence of eternal soul. The extent to which these doctrines, which were evidently inherited by Lokayata, were found contemptible and necessary to be refuted in the idealist, theist and religious literature of the time is a possible evidence of their popularity and, perhaps also, their philosophical sophistication.