Difference between revisions of "Fourth Dimension – Dimension of Thought"
(Created page with "thumb|250px| <poem> The Fourth Dimension and Theosophy: A summary of key ideas By Unknown In the 19th century, interest in the fourth dimension bega...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Sion-time.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:Sion-time.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | The Fourth Dimension and Theosophy: A summary of key ideas | + | The [[Fourth Dimension]] and [[Theosophy]]: A summary of key [[ideas]] |
By Unknown | By Unknown | ||
− | In the 19th century, interest in the fourth dimension began to emerge as an alternative to Euclidian geometry. Challenges to Euclidean geometry suggested the existence of curved space, rather than linear, and the possibility of change in the shape of forms as they moved through space. In addition to these challenges, the rise of science fiction helped pave the way for philosophical considerations of the idea of the fourth dimension. | + | In the 19th century, [[interest]] in the [[fourth dimension]] began to emerge as an alternative to Euclidian geometry. Challenges to {{Wiki|Euclidean}} geometry suggested the [[existence]] of curved [[space]], rather than linear, and the possibility of change in the shape of [[forms]] as they moved through [[space]]. In addition to these challenges, the rise of [[science]] {{Wiki|fiction}} helped pave the way for [[philosophical]] considerations of the [[idea]] of the [[fourth dimension]]. |
+ | |||
+ | One of the chief writers to promote a [[philosophy]] of the [[fourth dimension]] was the {{Wiki|Russian}} [[philosopher]], Uspensky, whose [[writing]] was dominated by a [[belief]] in the [[evolution]] of [[consciousness]], an [[evolution]] which enabled the eventual [[comprehension]] of the [[fourth dimension]]. He proposed that [[art]] and [[music]] were the [[paths]] to this evolved [[consciousness]]. | ||
− | |||
[[File:90nnm.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:90nnm.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | |||
− | Further, in the fourth dimension, time and motion are recognized as illusions. Consequently, to truly understand the fourth dimension required not only a new logic but also a new language. In this respect, the radically unfamiliar artistic languages of Kandinsky, Mondrian, and Malevich might be seen as direct responses to the philosophy of the fourth dimension, and as attempts to get past the third dimension to depict a gravity-free, directionless space. | + | According to Uspensky, the only way we could understand [[infinity]] was to understand it as an [[endless]] illogicality. The illogicality lay in the [[awareness]] that in the [[fourth dimension]], everything from the third [[dimension]] was reversed: [[reality]] and unreality of the third [[dimension]] changed places in the fourth. |
+ | |||
+ | Further, in the [[fourth dimension]], [[time]] and {{Wiki|motion}} are [[recognized]] as [[illusions]]. Consequently, to truly understand the [[fourth dimension]] required not only a new [[logic]] but also a new [[language]]. In this [[respect]], the radically unfamiliar artistic [[languages]] of Kandinsky, Mondrian, and Malevich might be seen as direct responses to the [[philosophy]] of the [[fourth dimension]], and as attempts to get {{Wiki|past}} the third [[dimension]] to depict a gravity-free, directionless [[space]]. | ||
− | Another fourth dimension concept, and one which connects fourth dimension thinking to theosophy, is that of monism. Monism referred to the unity of all things, to a spiritual and material unity which could be explained in the fourth dimension and only in the fourth dimension, because in the third dimension, dualities and separations continued to exist. | + | Another [[fourth dimension]] {{Wiki|concept}}, and one which connects [[fourth dimension]] [[thinking]] to [[theosophy]], is that of {{Wiki|monism}}. {{Wiki|Monism}} referred to the {{Wiki|unity}} of all things, to a [[spiritual]] and material {{Wiki|unity}} which could be explained in the [[fourth dimension]] and only in the [[fourth dimension]], because in the third [[dimension]], dualities and separations continued to [[exist]]. |
− | Theosophy, founded by Blavatsky, was an alternative way of thinking about spirituality and art. According to theosophy, the universe originally contained atoms and a vacuum. The vacuum was a latent force or deity, which could become organized into a willful force, meaning that out of nothingness, eventually the will would emerge. Duality became a positive concept for theosophy because it represented the union of the latent, which could not be known, and a living force or spirit, which could be known. | + | [[Theosophy]], founded by {{Wiki|Blavatsky}}, was an alternative way of [[thinking]] about [[spirituality]] and [[art]]. According to [[theosophy]], the [[universe]] originally contained {{Wiki|atoms}} and a {{Wiki|vacuum}}. The {{Wiki|vacuum}} was a latent force or [[deity]], which could become organized into a willful force, meaning that out of [[nothingness]], eventually the will would emerge. [[Duality]] became a positive {{Wiki|concept}} for [[theosophy]] because it represented the union of the latent, which could not be known, and a living force or [[spirit]], which could be known. |
− | The connection to art was made in at least two ways: one was through the belief that color had a vibrating spiritual property which would awaken the dormant spirituality within a person. Another was the belief that art should begin in nature and that the apocalypse would lead to the future new world. | + | The connection to [[art]] was made in at least two ways: one was through the [[belief]] that {{Wiki|color}} had a vibrating [[spiritual]] property which would [[awaken]] the dormant [[spirituality]] within a [[person]]. Another was the [[belief]] that [[art]] should begin in [[nature]] and that the apocalypse would lead to the {{Wiki|future}} new [[world]]. |
− | The eventual union of symbolist thought with theosophy fostered a belief in the communicative properties of color separated from form, in the goal of involving the viewer in a pathway or process of deciphering the meaning of hidden imagery, in the use of apocalyptic imagery, and in the belief that a painting of the confused order of reality would, like the apocalypse, lead to a new spiritual order. | + | The eventual union of symbolist [[thought]] with [[theosophy]] fostered a [[belief]] in the communicative properties of {{Wiki|color}} separated from [[form]], in the goal of involving the viewer in a pathway or process of deciphering the meaning of hidden [[imagery]], in the use of {{Wiki|apocalyptic}} [[imagery]], and in the [[belief]] that a painting of the confused order of [[reality]] would, like the apocalypse, lead to a new [[spiritual]] order. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
[http://thesevenminds.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/fourth-dimension-dimension-of-thought/#more-1347 thesevenminds.wordpress.com] | [http://thesevenminds.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/fourth-dimension-dimension-of-thought/#more-1347 thesevenminds.wordpress.com] | ||
− | [[Category:Mind]] | + | [[Category:Mind]]{{BuddhismbyNumber}} |
Latest revision as of 03:26, 29 August 2014
The Fourth Dimension and Theosophy: A summary of key ideas
By Unknown
In the 19th century, interest in the fourth dimension began to emerge as an alternative to Euclidian geometry. Challenges to Euclidean geometry suggested the existence of curved space, rather than linear, and the possibility of change in the shape of forms as they moved through space. In addition to these challenges, the rise of science fiction helped pave the way for philosophical considerations of the idea of the fourth dimension.
One of the chief writers to promote a philosophy of the fourth dimension was the Russian philosopher, Uspensky, whose writing was dominated by a belief in the evolution of consciousness, an evolution which enabled the eventual comprehension of the fourth dimension. He proposed that art and music were the paths to this evolved consciousness.
According to Uspensky, the only way we could understand infinity was to understand it as an endless illogicality. The illogicality lay in the awareness that in the fourth dimension, everything from the third dimension was reversed: reality and unreality of the third dimension changed places in the fourth.
Further, in the fourth dimension, time and motion are recognized as illusions. Consequently, to truly understand the fourth dimension required not only a new logic but also a new language. In this respect, the radically unfamiliar artistic languages of Kandinsky, Mondrian, and Malevich might be seen as direct responses to the philosophy of the fourth dimension, and as attempts to get past the third dimension to depict a gravity-free, directionless space.
Another fourth dimension concept, and one which connects fourth dimension thinking to theosophy, is that of monism. Monism referred to the unity of all things, to a spiritual and material unity which could be explained in the fourth dimension and only in the fourth dimension, because in the third dimension, dualities and separations continued to exist.
Theosophy, founded by Blavatsky, was an alternative way of thinking about spirituality and art. According to theosophy, the universe originally contained atoms and a vacuum. The vacuum was a latent force or deity, which could become organized into a willful force, meaning that out of nothingness, eventually the will would emerge. Duality became a positive concept for theosophy because it represented the union of the latent, which could not be known, and a living force or spirit, which could be known.
The connection to art was made in at least two ways: one was through the belief that color had a vibrating spiritual property which would awaken the dormant spirituality within a person. Another was the belief that art should begin in nature and that the apocalypse would lead to the future new world.
The eventual union of symbolist thought with theosophy fostered a belief in the communicative properties of color separated from form, in the goal of involving the viewer in a pathway or process of deciphering the meaning of hidden imagery, in the use of apocalyptic imagery, and in the belief that a painting of the confused order of reality would, like the apocalypse, lead to a new spiritual order.