Difference between revisions of "CAST OF CHARACTERS - 2"
m (Text replace - "result" to "result") |
m (1 revision: Robo text replace 30 sept) |
||
(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Thanks to Ed [[Worthy]] for his detailed comments and suggestions on my manuscript. Thanks to Karine Le Pajolec, Harrison Pemberton, and Thule Jug of Vienna [[Dharma]] Photos for use of photographs. Thanks also to others who helped in various ways along the way: Terry Burt, Derek Hanger, Brett and Amanda Hood, Carol Gerhardt, Jay Landman, Hannah Nydahl, Harrison Pemberton, and Stephanie Yang. I am grateful to Gerry Stowers for her [[friendship]] and support during the process of revising my manuscript and producing this [[book]]. All errors are solely the responsibility of the author. | + | Thanks to Ed [[Worthy]] for his detailed comments and suggestions on my manuscript. Thanks to Karine Le Pajolec, Harrison Pemberton, and Thule Jug of {{Wiki|Vienna}} [[Dharma]] Photos for use of photographs. Thanks also to others who helped in various ways along the way: Terry Burt, Derek Hanger, Brett and Amanda Hood, Carol Gerhardt, Jay Landman, Hannah Nydahl, Harrison Pemberton, and Stephanie Yang. I am grateful to Gerry Stowers for her [[friendship]] and support during the process of revising my manuscript and producing this [[book]]. All errors are solely the responsibility of the author. |
CAST OF CHARACTERS | CAST OF CHARACTERS | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
TRINLEY THAYE DORJE (1983-) | TRINLEY THAYE DORJE (1983-) | ||
− | Recognized by [[Shamar Rinpoche]]. He was born in | + | Recognized by [[Shamar Rinpoche]]. He was born in {{Wiki|Lhasa}}, escaped [[Tibet]] in 1994, and is now completing his [[education]] in {{Wiki|Kalimpong}} in the {{Wiki|Himalaya}} foothills of northeastern [[India]]. |
Supporters of Ogyen Trinley | Supporters of Ogyen Trinley | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
THE 12TH TAI SITU RINPOCHE ALSO KNOWN AS THE SITUPA (1954-) | THE 12TH TAI SITU RINPOCHE ALSO KNOWN AS THE SITUPA (1954-) | ||
− | The third-ranking [[spiritual]] leader of the [[Karma Kagyu]] school. Tai Situ is the [[primary]] supporter of Ogyen Trinley and originally presented the boy on the basis of a prediction [[letter]] that became | + | The third-ranking [[spiritual]] leader of the [[Karma Kagyu]] school. Tai Situ is the [[primary]] supporter of Ogyen Trinley and originally presented the boy on the basis of a prediction [[letter]] that became the subject of dispute. He served on the [[Council]] of Regents and then on the [[Karmapa]] Search Committee at [[Rumtek]]. His [[monastic]] seat is located in Bir, in [[Himachal Pradesh]] in {{Wiki|northwestern India}}. |
THE 12TH GOSHIR, GYALTSAB RINPOCHE (1954-) | THE 12TH GOSHIR, GYALTSAB RINPOCHE (1954-) | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
KHENCHEN THRANGU RINPOCHE | KHENCHEN THRANGU RINPOCHE | ||
− | The [[abbot]] of [[Rumtek monastery]] in [[Sikkim]] and head [[philosophy]] [[teacher]] there until he left to establish his own [[monasteries]] in 1975. | + | The [[abbot]] of [[Rumtek monastery]] in [[Sikkim]] and {{Wiki|head}} [[philosophy]] [[teacher]] there until he left to establish his own [[monasteries]] in 1975. |
TENZIN NAMGYAL | TENZIN NAMGYAL | ||
− | Assistant secretary of [[Rumtek monastery]] until dismissed in 1988. A layman, he was married to the sister of [[Thrangu Rinpoche]] until his [[death]] in 2005. | + | Assistant secretary of [[Rumtek monastery]] until dismissed in 1988. A [[layman]], he was married to the sister of [[Thrangu Rinpoche]] until his [[death]] in 2005. |
AKONG RINPOCHE | AKONG RINPOCHE | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
PREFACE | PREFACE | ||
− | This [[book]] is about corruption in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], but not about sex scandals. We have already seen discussions about [[Buddhist]] [[teachers]], particularly well known [[Zen]] [[masters]] and [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]], having romantic affairs with their students, especially those from Western countries. | + | This [[book]] is about corruption in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], but not about sex scandals. We have already seen discussions about [[Buddhist]] [[teachers]], particularly well known [[Zen]] [[masters]] and [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]], having romantic affairs with their students, especially those from Western countries. [1] This is [[nothing]] new, and it afflicts [[Buddhism]] as it does all other major [[religions]]. Here, I do not touch on this topic. |
− | Instead, I explore a type of corruption that I believe is much more insidious, and whose exposure can be of much greater benefit to [[people]] seeking to find meaning in their [[lives]] through a [[spiritual]] [[path]], or just trying | + | Instead, I explore a type of corruption that I believe is much more insidious, and whose exposure can be of much greater benefit to [[people]] seeking to find meaning in their [[lives]] through a [[spiritual]] [[path]], or just trying to understand the massive [[phenomenon]] that [[Tibetan Buddhism]] has become in the past thirty years. This [[book]] is a {{Wiki|history}} of a dispute among the [[highest]] [[lamas]] with [[roots]] centuries in the past and a present of deep [[shame]]. It is a dispute over the {{Wiki|identity}} of a [[lama]] called the [[Karmapa]]. |
− | I have been a student of [[Buddhism]] for a decade. I was inspired by this ancient path's time-tested methods to escape [[suffering]], and by the | + | I have been a student of [[Buddhism]] for a decade. I was inspired by this ancient path's time-tested methods to escape [[suffering]], and by the example of [[compassionate]] living [[offered]] by [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. A few years ago, when I first [[heard]] how [[spiritual]] leaders who stand for [[love]], [[peace]], and [[nonviolence]] had behaved in this dispute I was shocked and disillusioned. Were [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] just hypocrites and charlatans? If this was so, I would have been ready to give up [[Buddhism]] altogether. The only way I could remain was to discover the facts for myself. |
− | So that's what I set out to do. In the process, I discovered a dark side to some [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. But I also developed a [[confidence]] in the basic teachings of a [[spiritual]] [[tradition]] that was more mature, based on my own 'investigation, rather than merely on [[hopeful]] [[faith]]. I believe that this journey did me much good, and helped me grow intellectually and [[spiritually]]. I hope the reader will take much the same journey in these pages, and discover some of the same benefit along the way. | + | So that's what I set out to do. In the process, I discovered a dark side to some [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. But I also developed a [[confidence]] in the basic teachings of a [[spiritual]] [[tradition]] that was more mature, based on my own '[[investigation]], rather than merely on [[hopeful]] [[faith]]. I believe that this journey did me much good, and helped me grow intellectually and [[spiritually]]. I {{Wiki|hope}} the reader will take much the same journey in these pages, and discover some of the same benefit along the way. |
For the past three years, I have been a student of one of the main [[lamas]] involved in the controversy, [[Shamar Rinpoche]]. [[Thus]] I cannot claim to be a disinterested outsider. Shamar even suggested that I write this [[book]]. Four [[books]] have already come out in the last few years sympathetic to the [[views]] of his opponents. [2] These [[books]] raised many questions for me about the [[purity]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], and I am sure they raised the same questions for many others. So it seemed only fair to investigate Shamar's claims and give him a chance to tell his story. The following pages try to disentangle the many knots in the web of claims, counterclaims, and outright deceptions that have come to enshroud the topic of the [[Karmapa]] today. | For the past three years, I have been a student of one of the main [[lamas]] involved in the controversy, [[Shamar Rinpoche]]. [[Thus]] I cannot claim to be a disinterested outsider. Shamar even suggested that I write this [[book]]. Four [[books]] have already come out in the last few years sympathetic to the [[views]] of his opponents. [2] These [[books]] raised many questions for me about the [[purity]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], and I am sure they raised the same questions for many others. So it seemed only fair to investigate Shamar's claims and give him a chance to tell his story. The following pages try to disentangle the many knots in the web of claims, counterclaims, and outright deceptions that have come to enshroud the topic of the [[Karmapa]] today. | ||
− | Two young men are at the center of our story, and both of them claim to be the [[Karmapa]]. The four most recent [[books]] on | + | Two young men are at the center of our story, and both of them claim to be the [[Karmapa]]. The four most recent [[books]] on the subject all refer to one of the young men as "the [[Karmapa]]" while calling the other by his enthronement [[name]], the equivalent of a personal [[name]]. Here, I begin from the premise of an authentic controversy, so I do not presume to know which candidate is the genuine [[reincarnate]]. Accordingly, I do not call either candidate "the [[Karmapa]]." Instead, I refer to each young [[lama]] by his enthronement [[name]]. I {{Wiki|hope}} this will make for a fairer presentation that is also clearer for the reader. |
− | I would like to invite you, the reader, to make your own judgment on the specific issue of this [[book]] -- the story of the [[Karmapa]]. Considering the evidence, whom do you believe and whom do you [[trust]]! After that, it may be fruitful to consider how this connects to your [[attitude]] about [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and [[spiritual]] [[teachers]] in general. finally, if you follow a [[spiritual]] [[tradition]], or if you [[know]] someone who does, then I encourage you to [[meditate]] on what it means to follow a [[spiritual]] [[teacher]] with maturity, as an {{Wiki|intelligent}} [[person]] in the modern [[world]]. Is it possible to [[balance]] [[faith]] and [[logical]] [[thinking]]! Does | + | I would like to invite you, the reader, to make your own judgment on the specific issue of this [[book]] -- the story of the [[Karmapa]]. Considering the {{Wiki|evidence}}, whom do you believe and whom do you [[trust]]! After that, it may be fruitful to consider how this connects to your [[attitude]] about [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and [[spiritual]] [[teachers]] in general. finally, if you follow a [[spiritual]] [[tradition]], or if you [[know]] someone who does, then I encourage you to [[meditate]] on what it means to follow a [[spiritual]] [[teacher]] with maturity, as an {{Wiki|intelligent}} [[person]] in the {{Wiki|modern}} [[world]]. Is it possible to [[balance]] [[faith]] and [[logical]] [[thinking]]! Does {{Wiki|rationality}} conflict with [[faith]], or can {{Wiki|rationality}} enrich [[faith]]! When should we just believe, and when should we ask questions! |
If you can prove any of my claims wrong please [[contact]] me directly, I will correct them in future editions. | If you can prove any of my claims wrong please [[contact]] me directly, I will correct them in future editions. | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
Reincarnating [[Lamas]] | Reincarnating [[Lamas]] | ||
− | Near the beginning of Martin Scorsese's 1997 film Kundun, a search party from | + | Near the beginning of Martin Scorsese's 1997 film Kundun, a search party from {{Wiki|Lhasa}} arrives at a small village in the dusty northeastern borderlands between [[Tibet]] and [[China]]. The [[time]] is the late 1930s. The visitors are looking for a boy who they think might be the [[reincarnation]] of the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]] [[Thubten Gyatso]] (1876·1933), who [[died]] a few years earlier. |
− | Before his [[death]], the [[Tibetan]] leader had left a [[letter]], written in an obscure poetic style, indicating the family and place of his [[rebirth]]. Following their late lama's instructions, and consulting {{Wiki|intelligence}} reports, the [[Dalai]] Lama's administration in | + | Before his [[death]], the [[Tibetan]] leader had left a [[letter]], written in an obscure poetic style, indicating the family and place of his [[rebirth]]. Following their late lama's instructions, and consulting {{Wiki|intelligence}} reports, the [[Dalai]] Lama's administration in {{Wiki|Lhasa}} had [[put together]] a list of likely boys -- candidates for the [[Dalai]] Lama's [[reincarnation]]. |
− | Now, the | + | Now, the {{Wiki|Lhasa}} [[lamas]] have come to a remote province to investigate one of these boys, the son of a peasant family. Disguised as traders, they have not divulged the purpose of their mission to the small boy or to his [[parents]]. The [[lamas]] have brought personal items of the deceased [[Dalai Lama]] to test the boy. Inside the family's rustic. house, they spread these items out on a table and mix them together with newer, fancier versions of each [[object]]. |
− | The parents bring in their boy and the disguised [[lamas]] invite him to choose "his" belongings -- those which belonged to the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]]. Unprompted, the boy correctly chooses the [[Dalai]] Lama's rosary, [[ritual]] drum, and walking stick, leaving the more attractive, newer ones on the table. The boy has passed the test: he is the genuine [[reincarnation]] of the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]]. Convinced, the [[lamas]] prostrate to the boy, and address him as "Kundun," a title of [[respect]] for the [[Tibetan]] leader. | + | The [[parents]] bring in their boy and the disguised [[lamas]] invite him to choose "his" belongings -- those which belonged to the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]]. Unprompted, the boy correctly chooses the [[Dalai]] Lama's rosary, [[ritual]] drum, and walking stick, leaving the more attractive, newer ones on the table. The boy has passed the test: he is the genuine [[reincarnation]] of the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]]. Convinced, the [[lamas]] prostrate to the boy, and address him as "Kundun," a title of [[respect]] for the [[Tibetan]] leader. |
− | [[Buddhists]] everywhere believe that [[humans]] and all other [[beings]] [[die]] and then are [[reborn]] again and again in endless [[reincarnations]], until they reach the [[state of enlightenment]]. [[Enlightenment]], or [[nirvana]], is the end of all [[suffering]] and the goal of [[Buddhism]]. [[Buddhists]] believe that [[enlightenment]] is reached by developing perfect [[wisdom]] and [[compassion]] through following the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] of correct [[view]], goal, [[speech]], [[action]], [[livelihood]], [[effort]], [[mindfulness]], and [[meditation]]. | + | [[Buddhists]] everywhere believe that [[humans]] and all other [[beings]] [[die]] and then are [[reborn]] again and again in [[endless]] [[reincarnations]], until they reach the [[state of enlightenment]]. [[Enlightenment]], or [[nirvana]], is the end of all [[suffering]] and the goal of [[Buddhism]]. [[Buddhists]] believe that [[enlightenment]] is reached by developing perfect [[wisdom]] and [[compassion]] through following the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] of correct [[view]], goal, [[speech]], [[action]], [[livelihood]], [[effort]], [[mindfulness]], and [[meditation]]. |
− | [[Siddhartha Gautama]], a {{Wiki|prince}} of the Shakya clan that ruled one of the small kingdoms in the [[Himalayan]] foothills of {{Wiki|northern India}} in the sixth century B.C., set the | + | [[Siddhartha Gautama]], a {{Wiki|prince}} of the [[Shakya]] {{Wiki|clan}} that ruled one of the small kingdoms in the [[Himalayan]] foothills of {{Wiki|northern India}} in the sixth century B.C., set the example when he renounced palace [[life]] and took to the road as a wandering [[ascetic]]. After years of fruitless practices, one day the young man sat down on a pile of grass under a large leafy [[tree]] by the Naranjana [[River]]. He determined not to rise from his seat until he surmounted all [[craving]], thus liberating himself from the need to be [[reborn]] again in the [[physical]] [[world]]. He [[meditated]] through the night, resisted all the blandishments and threats of [[Mara]], the [[lord of death]], and as the {{Wiki|sun}} rose, the young man reached [[enlightenment]], thus becoming the [[Buddha]] or [[Enlightened One]]. |
− | Known as [[Shakyamuni]] or the Sage of the [[Shakyas]], the [[Buddha]] spent the next forty years traveling around {{Wiki|northern India}}, giving sermons on the way out of [[suffering]], and gaining [[disciples]]. He formed a [[community of monks]], and later, an [[order]] of [[nuns]], creating the [[Buddhist]] [[sangha]] of [[ordained]] practitioners. As needed, the [[Buddha]] came up with rules to ensure the [[harmony]] of the [[sangha]], and his [[disciples]] codified these as the [[Vinaya]]. At age eighty, he [[died]] at Kushinagara, giving a final [[teaching]] on the [[impermanence]] of all [[beings]] and things, including the [[Buddha]] himself. After his [[death]], the [[Buddha's]] [[disciples]] carried on the work of the [[monastic]] [[sangha]] and passed along the [[Buddha's teachings]] as the [[sutras]]. | + | Known as [[Shakyamuni]] or the [[Sage]] of the [[Shakyas]], the [[Buddha]] spent the next forty years traveling around {{Wiki|northern India}}, giving sermons on the way out of [[suffering]], and gaining [[disciples]]. He formed a [[community of monks]], and later, an [[order]] of [[nuns]], creating the [[Buddhist]] [[sangha]] of [[ordained]] practitioners. As needed, the [[Buddha]] came up with rules to ensure the [[harmony]] of the [[sangha]], and his [[disciples]] codified these as the [[Vinaya]]. At age eighty, he [[died]] at [[Kushinagara]], giving a final [[teaching]] on the [[impermanence]] of all [[beings]] and things, including the [[Buddha]] himself. After his [[death]], the [[Buddha's]] [[disciples]] carried on the work of the [[monastic]] [[sangha]] and passed along the [[Buddha's teachings]] as the [[sutras]]. |
− | After a couple of centuries, [[Buddhism]] began to divide into three main approaches, or [[paths]]. Much like Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant {{Wiki|Christianity}}, each [[path]] of [[Buddhism]] is defined by its [[religious]] practice as well as by the geographical areas it came to occupy. | + | After a couple of centuries, [[Buddhism]] began to divide into three main approaches, or [[paths]]. Much like {{Wiki|Catholic}}, Orthodox, and {{Wiki|Protestant}} {{Wiki|{{Wiki|Christianity}}}}, each [[path]] of [[Buddhism]] is defined by its [[religious]] practice as well as by the geographical areas it came to occupy. |
− | The [[Theravada]], or "[[Teaching]] of the [[Elders]]," developed out of one of the [[early Buddhist schools]] of [[India]], and taught the value of [[ascetic]] [[monastic]] practice in [[order]] to become an [[arhat]], a "[[worthy]] one" who has freed him- or herself from all [[worldly]] [[craving]] and from the endless cycle of [[birth]] and [[death]] known as [[samsara]]. [[Theravada Buddhism]] can be traced to the third century B.C. and is found today in the nations of south and | + | The [[Theravada]], or "[[Teaching]] of the [[Elders]]," developed out of one of the [[early Buddhist schools]] of [[India]], and taught the value of [[ascetic]] [[monastic]] practice in [[order]] to become an [[arhat]], a "[[worthy]] one" who has freed him- or herself from all [[worldly]] [[craving]] and from the [[endless]] cycle of [[birth]] and [[death]] known as [[samsara]]. [[Theravada Buddhism]] can be traced to the third century B.C. and is found today in the nations of {{Wiki|south}} and {{Wiki|Southeast Asia}}, including [[Sri Lanka]], [[Thailand]], and [[Burma]]. |
− | Some early [[Buddhists]] criticized a focus on one's own salvation, not explicitly [[thinking]] of others, as inherently [[selfish]] and dubbed it the [[Hinayana]] or "Narrow [[Path]]." As an alternative, in the first century B.C. [[teachers]] began to present the [[Mahayana]] or "Great [[Path]]," in which [[altruism]] became the [[path]] to [[enlightenment]]. [[Mahayana]] practitioners sought to become [[bodhisattvas]], [[beings]] whose every [[thought]], [[word]], and [[deed]] was dedicated to saving all [[beings]] from [[suffering]]. Today, the [[Mahayana]] is found in {{Wiki|East Asian}} countries including [[China]], [[Japan]], [[Korea]], and [[Vietnam]]. | + | Some early [[Buddhists]] criticized a focus on one's own {{Wiki|salvation}}, not explicitly [[thinking]] of others, as inherently [[selfish]] and dubbed it the [[Hinayana]] or "Narrow [[Path]]." As an alternative, in the first century B.C. [[teachers]] began to present the [[Mahayana]] or "Great [[Path]]," in which [[altruism]] became the [[path]] to [[enlightenment]]. [[Mahayana]] practitioners sought to become [[bodhisattvas]], [[beings]] whose every [[thought]], [[word]], and [[deed]] was dedicated to saving all [[beings]] from [[suffering]]. Today, the [[Mahayana]] is found in {{Wiki|East Asian}} countries including [[China]], [[Japan]], [[Korea]], and [[Vietnam]]. |
− | The [[path]] of the [[bodhisattva]] was said to be a sure [[path]] to [[enlightenment]], but was also said to take millions of lifetimes to achieve. In the middle of the first millennium A.D., adepts in north and {{Wiki|northwestern India}} came upon a more powerful approach, one they said could bring [[enlightenment]] in one [[lifetime]], the [[Vajrayana]], or "[[Diamond]] [[Path]]." [[Vajrayana]] or [[Tantric]] practitioners sought to save themselves and all [[beings]] by [[realizing]] the [[enlightened]] qualities in their own [[cravings]] and [[illusions]]. [[Indian]] [[missionaries]] brought this supercharged version of the [[Mahayana]] over the [[Himalayas]] to [[Tibet]] beginning in the eighth century. | + | The [[path]] of the [[bodhisattva]] was said to be a sure [[path]] to [[enlightenment]], but was also said to take millions of lifetimes to achieve. In the middle of the first millennium A.D., adepts in {{Wiki|north}} and {{Wiki|northwestern India}} came upon a more powerful approach, one they said could bring [[enlightenment]] in one [[lifetime]], the [[Vajrayana]], or "[[Diamond]] [[Path]]." [[Vajrayana]] or [[Tantric]] practitioners sought to save themselves and all [[beings]] by [[realizing]] the [[enlightened]] qualities in their own [[cravings]] and [[illusions]]. [[Indian]] [[missionaries]] brought this supercharged version of the [[Mahayana]] over the [[Himalayas]] to [[Tibet]] beginning in the eighth century. |
− | While all [[Buddhists]] believe in [[rebirth]], only in the [[Himalayas]] did [[people]] come to believe that their highest [[spiritual]] [[teachers]] [[consciously]] chose to return to teach their students, [[lifetime]] after [[lifetime]]. | + | While all [[Buddhists]] believe in [[rebirth]], only in the [[Himalayas]] did [[people]] come to believe that their [[highest]] [[spiritual]] [[teachers]] [[consciously]] chose to return to teach their students, [[lifetime]] after [[lifetime]]. |
− | According to [[Vajrayana]] [[belief]], after [[death]], these [[teachers]] were [[reborn]] as [[reincarnate lamas]], or [[tulkus]], whose [[boundless]] [[compassion]] led them to postpone the [[bliss]] of [[enlightenment]] until all [[living beings]] would be liberated as well. The [[tulku]] is the [[Himalayan]] [[embodiment]] of the [[Mahayana]] ideal of the [[bodhisattva]], but the [[tulku]] system is found in no other branch of [[Buddhism]] and in no other major [[religion]]. It is unique to [[Vajrayana | + | According to [[Vajrayana]] [[belief]], after [[death]], these [[teachers]] were [[reborn]] as [[reincarnate lamas]], or [[tulkus]], whose [[boundless]] [[compassion]] led them to postpone the [[bliss]] of [[enlightenment]] until all [[living beings]] would be liberated as well. The [[tulku]] is the [[Himalayan]] [[embodiment]] of the [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|ideal}} of the [[bodhisattva]], but the [[tulku]] system is found in no other branch of [[Buddhism]] and in no other major [[religion]]. It is unique to [[Vajrayana Buddhism]], and since its origin in the thirteenth century, the [[tulku]] {{Wiki|ideal}} has been an important source of power, [[purity]], and authenticity in the [[Diamond]] [[Path]]. |
One practical advantage of the [[tulku]] system at its inception was to take politics out of deciding who would lead a [[monastery]] after its last leader's [[death]]. Previously, in [[Tibet]], powerful {{Wiki|aristocratic}} patrons would use their [[influence]] to get one of their sons appointed to lead a [[monastery]]. This effectively put the cloisters under the control of local landowners and warlords and made the [[religious]] centers [[subject]] to the rivalry of competing families. These families involved [[lamas]] in their {{Wiki|political}} conflicts and disrupted the [[monasteries]]' [[spiritual]] work. The [[tulku]] system promised to solve this problem. Over eight centuries that followed, [[reincarnate lamas]] became the bedrock of [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] and the foundation of the largest [[monastic]] system on [[earth]]. | One practical advantage of the [[tulku]] system at its inception was to take politics out of deciding who would lead a [[monastery]] after its last leader's [[death]]. Previously, in [[Tibet]], powerful {{Wiki|aristocratic}} patrons would use their [[influence]] to get one of their sons appointed to lead a [[monastery]]. This effectively put the cloisters under the control of local landowners and warlords and made the [[religious]] centers [[subject]] to the rivalry of competing families. These families involved [[lamas]] in their {{Wiki|political}} conflicts and disrupted the [[monasteries]]' [[spiritual]] work. The [[tulku]] system promised to solve this problem. Over eight centuries that followed, [[reincarnate lamas]] became the bedrock of [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] and the foundation of the largest [[monastic]] system on [[earth]]. | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
Today, in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], there are hundreds of [[lamas]] reputed to be [[tulkus]]. The [[Dalai Lama]] -- the current [[incarnation]] [[Tenzin Gyatso]] is the fourteenth of his line -- is the most famous [[tulku]] of [[Tibet]]. But he and his thirteen predecessors were not the first [[lamas]] said to take [[rebirth]] intentionally to continue their work as [[bodhisattvas]]. The first [[tulku]] of [[Tibet]] was a [[lama]] known as the [[Karmapa]]. | Today, in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], there are hundreds of [[lamas]] reputed to be [[tulkus]]. The [[Dalai Lama]] -- the current [[incarnation]] [[Tenzin Gyatso]] is the fourteenth of his line -- is the most famous [[tulku]] of [[Tibet]]. But he and his thirteen predecessors were not the first [[lamas]] said to take [[rebirth]] intentionally to continue their work as [[bodhisattvas]]. The first [[tulku]] of [[Tibet]] was a [[lama]] known as the [[Karmapa]]. | ||
− | In the twelfth century, the first [[Karmapa]] [[Dusum Khyenpa]] predicted that he would return to teach his students and manage his [[monastery]] in his next [[lifetime]]. And sure enough, when [[Dusum Khyenpa]] [[died]], his students located a boy who showed signs that he was the [[reincarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]]. The boy was named [[Karma Pakshi]] and when he was old enough, he inherited control over the [[Karmapa's]] cloister and his activities. From then on, the [[Karmapa's]] [[monastery]] was relatively free of control by local [[noble]] families. [[Being]] able to choose their own leader, the [[Karmapa's]] [[lamas]] became [[masters]] of their own [[destiny]]. | + | In the twelfth century, the first [[Karmapa]] [[Dusum Khyenpa]] predicted that he would return to teach his students and manage his [[monastery]] in his next [[lifetime]]. And sure enough, when [[Dusum Khyenpa]] [[died]], his students located a boy who showed signs that he was the [[reincarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]]. The boy was named [[Karma Pakshi]] and when he was old enough, he inherited control over the [[Karmapa's]] cloister and his [[activities]]. From then on, the [[Karmapa's]] [[monastery]] was relatively free of control by local [[noble]] families. [[Being]] able to choose their own leader, the [[Karmapa's]] [[lamas]] became [[masters]] of their own [[destiny]]. |
Impressed by the success of this system, other [[monasteries]] copied it as a means to choose their own top [[lamas]]. [[Thus]], over a period of a couple centuries, [[power]] shifted in [[Tibet]] from land-owning families to the [[lamas]]. who managed the most powerful [[monasteries]]. The most revered [[tulkus]] attracted donations and students, developing [[monastic]] empires and {{Wiki|political}} [[power]] of their own. As [[tulkus]] became major {{Wiki|political}} leaders in their regions, lama-rule in [[Tibet]] reached its apex. In the late fourteenth century, nearly three centuries after the first [[Karmapa]], the [[Dalai]] [[Lamas]] would appear. Two centuries after that, in 1642, the [[fifth Dalai Lama]] would take over the throne of central [[Tibet]] from a dynasty of secular {{Wiki|kings}}. | Impressed by the success of this system, other [[monasteries]] copied it as a means to choose their own top [[lamas]]. [[Thus]], over a period of a couple centuries, [[power]] shifted in [[Tibet]] from land-owning families to the [[lamas]]. who managed the most powerful [[monasteries]]. The most revered [[tulkus]] attracted donations and students, developing [[monastic]] empires and {{Wiki|political}} [[power]] of their own. As [[tulkus]] became major {{Wiki|political}} leaders in their regions, lama-rule in [[Tibet]] reached its apex. In the late fourteenth century, nearly three centuries after the first [[Karmapa]], the [[Dalai]] [[Lamas]] would appear. Two centuries after that, in 1642, the [[fifth Dalai Lama]] would take over the throne of central [[Tibet]] from a dynasty of secular {{Wiki|kings}}. | ||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
Outsiders might think that [[tulkus]] were always chosen according to set procedures laid down to ensure the accuracy of the result -- that the child located would be the genuine [[reincarnation]] of the [[dead]] [[master]], as in the scene from the movie Kundun. But in [[Tibetan history]], [[tulku]] searches were not always conducted in such a [[pure]] way. Because reincarnating [[lamas]] inherited great [[wealth]] and [[power]] from their predecessors they became the center of many {{Wiki|political}} disputes. | Outsiders might think that [[tulkus]] were always chosen according to set procedures laid down to ensure the accuracy of the result -- that the child located would be the genuine [[reincarnation]] of the [[dead]] [[master]], as in the scene from the movie Kundun. But in [[Tibetan history]], [[tulku]] searches were not always conducted in such a [[pure]] way. Because reincarnating [[lamas]] inherited great [[wealth]] and [[power]] from their predecessors they became the center of many {{Wiki|political}} disputes. | ||
− | [[Tulkus]] were often recognized based on non-religious factors. Sometimes [[monastic]] officials wanted a child from a powerful local [[noble]] family to give their cloister more {{Wiki|political}} clout. Other times, they wanted a child from a lower-class family that would have little leverage to [[influence]] the child's upbringing. In yet other situations, the [[desires]] of the [[monastic]] officials took second place to external politics. A local warlord, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} emperor, or even the [[Dalai]] Lama's government in | + | [[Tulkus]] were often [[recognized]] based on non-religious factors. Sometimes [[monastic]] officials wanted a child from a powerful local [[noble]] family to give their cloister more {{Wiki|political}} clout. Other times, they wanted a child from a lower-class family that would have little leverage to [[influence]] the child's upbringing. In yet other situations, the [[desires]] of the [[monastic]] officials took second place to {{Wiki|external}} politics. A local warlord, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|emperor}}, or even the [[Dalai]] Lama's government in {{Wiki|Lhasa}} might try to impose its choice of [[tulku]] on a [[monastery]] for {{Wiki|political}} [[reasons]]. |
− | Only the strongest [[monastic]] administrations had the ability to resist such external pressures, and the [[Karmapa's]] [[monastery]] was one of these. Sixteen [[Karmapas]] were recognized by the [[Karmapa's]] own [[monastery]] without participation from outsiders. Only in one instance, when the sixteenth [[Karmapa]] was recognized in the 19205, did the [[Tibetan]] government of the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]] try to intervene in choosing a [[Karmapa]]. In that case, as we will see later. the government ultimately had to back down. | + | Only the strongest [[monastic]] administrations had the ability to resist such {{Wiki|external}} pressures, and the [[Karmapa's]] [[monastery]] was one of these. Sixteen [[Karmapas]] were [[recognized]] by the [[Karmapa's]] own [[monastery]] without participation from outsiders. Only in one instance, when the sixteenth [[Karmapa]] was [[recognized]] in the 19205, did the [[Tibetan]] government of the thirteenth [[Dalai Lama]] try to intervene in choosing a [[Karmapa]]. In that case, as we will see later. the government ultimately had to back down. |
− | When the highest [[lamas]] fled [[Tibet]] along with nearly a hundred thousand refugees from {{Wiki|Chinese}} rule in 1959, the [[lamas]] reestablished their [[monasteries]] in exile. The sixteenth [[Karmapa]] built the [[monastery]] of [[Rumtek]] in the tiny [[Himalayan]] kingdom of [[Sikkim]], which became a state of [[India]] in 1975. | + | When the [[highest]] [[lamas]] fled [[Tibet]] along with nearly a hundred thousand refugees from {{Wiki|Chinese}} rule in 1959, the [[lamas]] reestablished their [[monasteries]] in exile. The sixteenth [[Karmapa]] built the [[monastery]] of [[Rumtek]] in the tiny [[Himalayan]] {{Wiki|kingdom}} of [[Sikkim]], which became a state of [[India]] in 1975. |
After the sixteenth [[Karmapa]] [[died]] in 1981, the [[lamas]] who ran [[Rumtek]] clashed with other [[lamas]] from the [[Karmapa's]] [[Karma Kagyu]] school of [[Buddhism]] over finding his [[reincarnation]], the seventeenth [[Karmapa]]. In 1992, two high-ranking [[lamas]] enthroned a boy of their choosing in [[Tibet]] against the wishes of the previous [[Karmapa's]] administration at [[Rumtek]]. To his credit, this boy had powerful friends and enjoyed the support of the [[Dalai Lama]] and, surprisingly, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} government as well. But this was not enough to convince the administration of [[Rumtek]] to accept him. So, with the help of local state police and paramilitary forces, the two renegade [[lamas]] and their followers took over the [[monastery]] in 1993, replaced the administration with their own [[people]], and then proclaimed their boy the new [[Karmapa]]. | After the sixteenth [[Karmapa]] [[died]] in 1981, the [[lamas]] who ran [[Rumtek]] clashed with other [[lamas]] from the [[Karmapa's]] [[Karma Kagyu]] school of [[Buddhism]] over finding his [[reincarnation]], the seventeenth [[Karmapa]]. In 1992, two high-ranking [[lamas]] enthroned a boy of their choosing in [[Tibet]] against the wishes of the previous [[Karmapa's]] administration at [[Rumtek]]. To his credit, this boy had powerful friends and enjoyed the support of the [[Dalai Lama]] and, surprisingly, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} government as well. But this was not enough to convince the administration of [[Rumtek]] to accept him. So, with the help of local state police and paramilitary forces, the two renegade [[lamas]] and their followers took over the [[monastery]] in 1993, replaced the administration with their own [[people]], and then proclaimed their boy the new [[Karmapa]]. | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
Loyalty vs. [[Religious]] Freedom | Loyalty vs. [[Religious]] Freedom | ||
− | The dispute over the identity of the [[Karmapa]] is a bewildering mix of [[religion]], geopolitics, and infighting among exiled [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. It is a complex story, not easy to untangle from the outside. For outsiders, the story is troubling from the beginning. It shows [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] in a very negative [[light]]. It also shows [[Tibetans]] disagreeing with the [[Dalai Lama]]. We are used to [[hearing]] the [[Dalai Lama]] described as the "[[spiritual]] leader of [[Tibet]]." Given that, do the claims of the [[Tibetans]] who dispute his [[selection]] of the [[Karmapa]] have any [[merit]]? And, if so, should their story affect the way we [[view]] the [[Dalai Lama]]? | + | The dispute over the {{Wiki|identity}} of the [[Karmapa]] is a bewildering mix of [[religion]], geopolitics, and infighting among exiled [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. It is a complex story, not easy to untangle from the outside. For outsiders, the story is troubling from the beginning. It shows [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] in a very negative [[light]]. It also shows [[Tibetans]] disagreeing with the [[Dalai Lama]]. We are used to [[hearing]] the [[Dalai Lama]] described as the "[[spiritual]] leader of [[Tibet]]." Given that, do the claims of the [[Tibetans]] who dispute his [[selection]] of the [[Karmapa]] have any [[merit]]? And, if so, should their story affect the way we [[view]] the [[Dalai Lama]]? |
− | Since the first [[Dalai Lama]] appeared, his successors have been the effective leaders of the [[Gelug]], one of the five [[religious]] schools of [[Tibet]]. | + | Since the first [[Dalai Lama]] appeared, his successors have been the effective leaders of the [[Gelug]], one of the five [[religious]] schools of [[Tibet]]. [1] Starting in 1642, the [[Dalai]] [[Lamas]] were also the {{Wiki|political}} rulers of the central provinces of the huge area now called [[Tibet]], an area I will refer to as Central [[Tibet]]. This gave the [[Dalai]] [[Lamas]] a mix of [[religious]] and {{Wiki|political}} authority that has been difficult for {{Wiki|historians}} to sort out. Were the [[Dalai]] [[Lamas]] the [[recognized]] leaders of all the [[religious]] groups of [[Tibet]]? And is the current [[Dalai Lama]] the [[religious]] leader of all [[Tibetans]] today? His supporters say yes. But many [[Tibetans]] disagree. They hold that the four [[religious]] schools outside of the [[Dalai]] Lama's own [[Gelug]] governed themselves autonomously back in [[Tibet]] -- and that they continue to run their own affairs today, without reference to the authority of the [[Dalai Lama]]. |
− | In 1959 the [[Dalai Lama]] fled [[Tibet]] for exile to [[India]] and he took his government ministers with him. Ever since, he and his officials have run an exile government in [[India]] whose main goal has been to regain [[influence]] in [[Tibet]]. Until the late eighties, the [[Dalai Lama]] demanded independence for his [[people]] from [[China]]. After that goal came to seem unattainable, he moderated his demand to autonomy for [[Tibetans]] within [[China]]. Over nearly half a century living in the free [[world]], the [[Dalai Lama]] has learned much about the grim [[realities]] of geopolitics. He has also imbibed concepts such as [[human]] rights and [[religious]] freedom. These ideas were unknown in old [[Tibet]], yet the [[Dalai Lama]] has skillfully adopted these modern concepts in his own quest to gain more freedom for [[Tibetans]]. | + | In 1959 the [[Dalai Lama]] fled [[Tibet]] for exile to [[India]] and he took his government ministers with him. Ever since, he and his officials have run an exile government in [[India]] whose main goal has been to regain [[influence]] in [[Tibet]]. Until the late eighties, the [[Dalai Lama]] demanded {{Wiki|independence}} for his [[people]] from [[China]]. After that goal came to seem unattainable, he moderated his demand to autonomy for [[Tibetans]] within [[China]]. Over nearly half a century living in the free [[world]], the [[Dalai Lama]] has learned much about the grim [[realities]] of geopolitics. He has also imbibed concepts such as [[human]] rights and [[religious]] freedom. These ideas were unknown in old [[Tibet]], yet the [[Dalai Lama]] has skillfully adopted these {{Wiki|modern}} concepts in his own quest to gain more freedom for [[Tibetans]]. |
− | "When we demand the rights and freedoms we so cherish we should also be aware of our responsibilities. If we accept that others have an equal right to [[peace]] and [[happiness]] as ourselves, do we not have a responsibility to help those in need?" the [[Dalai Lama]] asked in a [[speech]] at the [[World]] Conference on [[Human]] Rights in Vienna in 1993. "The rich diversity of cultures and [[religions]] should help to strengthen the fundamental [[human]] rights in all communities. Because underlying this diversity are fundamental principles that bind us all as members of the same [[human]] family. Diversity and [[traditions]] can never justify the violations of [[human]] rights." [2] | + | "When we demand the rights and freedoms we so cherish we should also be aware of our responsibilities. If we accept that others have an equal right to [[peace]] and [[happiness]] as ourselves, do we not have a responsibility to help those in need?" the [[Dalai Lama]] asked in a [[speech]] at the [[World]] Conference on [[Human]] Rights in {{Wiki|Vienna}} in 1993. "The rich diversity of cultures and [[religions]] should help to strengthen the fundamental [[human]] rights in all communities. Because underlying this diversity are fundamental {{Wiki|principles}} that bind us all as members of the same [[human]] family. Diversity and [[traditions]] can never justify the violations of [[human]] rights." [2] |
In perhaps his biggest challenge, the [[Dalai Lama]] has had to walk a fine line to maintain his integrity as a [[Buddhist]] [[lama]] while also running an exile government. As there are chauvinists of {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[nationalism]], or of any other group's attempts to advance itself, so there are chauvinists of [[Tibetan]] [[nationalism]]. And as there is dissent among any group, so [[Tibetans]] in exile hold a range of [[views]] on how best to advance [[Tibetan]] [[nationalism]] and preserve [[Tibetan Buddhism]]. | In perhaps his biggest challenge, the [[Dalai Lama]] has had to walk a fine line to maintain his integrity as a [[Buddhist]] [[lama]] while also running an exile government. As there are chauvinists of {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[nationalism]], or of any other group's attempts to advance itself, so there are chauvinists of [[Tibetan]] [[nationalism]]. And as there is dissent among any group, so [[Tibetans]] in exile hold a range of [[views]] on how best to advance [[Tibetan]] [[nationalism]] and preserve [[Tibetan Buddhism]]. | ||
− | Some exiled [[Tibetans]] {{Wiki|fear}} that [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] will [[die]] without a [[Tibetan]] national state to actively promote the [[Tibetan language]] along with Tibet's distinctive culture and customs. These [[Tibetans]] are most likely to argue that [[Buddhism]] should serve politics, and that bringing [[Tibetans]] together into a coherent, united [[people]] is more important than ensuring that the variety of [[lineages]] and practices of [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] can flourish in the contemporary [[world]]. For many [[Tibetans]], loyalty to the [[Dalai Lama]] effectively trumps [[religious]] freedom, though they might not put it so bluntly. Instead, they might speak of "unity" -- how important it is to unify all [[Tibetans]] behind the [[Dalai Lama]]. | + | Some exiled [[Tibetans]] {{Wiki|fear}} that [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] will [[die]] without a [[Tibetan]] national state to actively promote the [[Tibetan language]] along with Tibet's {{Wiki|distinctive}} {{Wiki|culture}} and customs. These [[Tibetans]] are most likely to argue that [[Buddhism]] should serve politics, and that bringing [[Tibetans]] together into a coherent, united [[people]] is more important than ensuring that the variety of [[lineages]] and practices of [[Tibetan]] [[religion]] can flourish in the contemporary [[world]]. For many [[Tibetans]], loyalty to the [[Dalai Lama]] effectively trumps [[religious]] freedom, though they might not put it so bluntly. Instead, they might speak of "unity" -- how important it is to unify all [[Tibetans]] behind the [[Dalai Lama]]. |
− | Yet other [[Tibetans]] [[feel]] that [[Buddhism]] can [[live]] on in {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Tibet]] as long as there can be a separation of church and state. Still others see a bright future for [[Buddhism]] in the [[world]] outside of [[Tibet]]. In our exploration of the [[Karmapa]] issue, we will meet [[Tibetans]] and outsiders who embrace each of these [[views]]. We will also consider the purpose of [[Tibetan Buddhism]]. Important questions arise: Should [[religion]] bring all [[Tibetans]] together and promote a free [[Tibet]] and [[world]] [[peace]] in general? Or does [[religion]] have another purpose, to help [[people]] reach their {{Wiki|individual}} [[happiness]] through their own [[faith]] and [[diligence]], irrespective of race, culture, and [[language]]? | + | Yet other [[Tibetans]] [[feel]] that [[Buddhism]] can [[live]] on in {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Tibet]] as long as there can be a separation of church and state. Still others see a bright future for [[Buddhism]] in the [[world]] outside of [[Tibet]]. In our exploration of the [[Karmapa]] issue, we will meet [[Tibetans]] and outsiders who embrace each of these [[views]]. We will also consider the purpose of [[Tibetan Buddhism]]. Important questions arise: Should [[religion]] bring all [[Tibetans]] together and promote a free [[Tibet]] and [[world]] [[peace]] in general? Or does [[religion]] have another purpose, to help [[people]] reach their {{Wiki|individual}} [[happiness]] through their own [[faith]] and [[diligence]], irrespective of race, {{Wiki|culture}}, and [[language]]? |
Digging up Skeletons | Digging up Skeletons | ||
− | Sometimes [[Tibetans]] and their foreign supporters tend to project an image of old [[Tibet]] and [[Tibetan]] exiles today as relatively free of sectarian strife. This is understandable, since a positive image has gone a long way towards creating worldwide interest in the [[Tibetan]] [[cause]], interest that other refugee groups have not been able to garner for themselves. "Unity of the Church is ideally and practically valued in exile, and great efforts are made by the [[Tibetan]] (exile) government to display unity, especially through the Private and [[Information]] Offices (of the [[Dalai Lama]] in [[India]])." [3] Criticisms, whether from [[Tibetans]] or outsiders, are often strongly rejected as harmful to the [[cause]] of [[Tibetan]] unity and thus, of [[Tibetan]] freedom and [[human]] rights in [[China]]. | + | Sometimes [[Tibetans]] and their foreign supporters tend to project an image of old [[Tibet]] and [[Tibetan]] exiles today as relatively free of sectarian strife. This is understandable, since a positive image has gone a long way towards creating worldwide [[interest]] in the [[Tibetan]] [[cause]], [[interest]] that other refugee groups have not been able to garner for themselves. "Unity of the Church is ideally and practically valued in exile, and great efforts are made by the [[Tibetan]] (exile) government to display unity, especially through the Private and [[Information]] Offices (of the [[Dalai Lama]] in [[India]])." [3] Criticisms, whether from [[Tibetans]] or outsiders, are often strongly rejected as harmful to the [[cause]] of [[Tibetan]] unity and thus, of [[Tibetan]] freedom and [[human]] rights in [[China]]. |
Many writers have discussed the problems of [[Tibet]] under the {{Wiki|Chinese}} and the [[Tibetan]] freedom movement that arose in response. Our story is more concerned with how politics within the [[Tibetan]] community has affected [[Buddhism]]. However much we may sympathize with the [[Dalai Lama]] or the plight of the {{Wiki|Tibetan people}} under {{Wiki|Chinese}} rule, we should not be too quick to smooth over serious conflicts among the leading [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] themselves. | Many writers have discussed the problems of [[Tibet]] under the {{Wiki|Chinese}} and the [[Tibetan]] freedom movement that arose in response. Our story is more concerned with how politics within the [[Tibetan]] community has affected [[Buddhism]]. However much we may sympathize with the [[Dalai Lama]] or the plight of the {{Wiki|Tibetan people}} under {{Wiki|Chinese}} rule, we should not be too quick to smooth over serious conflicts among the leading [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] themselves. | ||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
This [[book]] explores the [[Karmapa controversy]] as a case study of the corruption that has infected [[Tibetan Buddhism]] in-exile, as normal [[human]] [[emotions]] have been unleashed without the [[traditional]] strictures of [[life]] in [[Tibet]] to restrain them. It is a story of [[spiritual]] leaders involved in violence, [[deceit]], murder -- and even litigation. Should this story affect how the {{Wiki|world views}} [[Tibetan Buddhism]]? | This [[book]] explores the [[Karmapa controversy]] as a case study of the corruption that has infected [[Tibetan Buddhism]] in-exile, as normal [[human]] [[emotions]] have been unleashed without the [[traditional]] strictures of [[life]] in [[Tibet]] to restrain them. It is a story of [[spiritual]] leaders involved in violence, [[deceit]], murder -- and even litigation. Should this story affect how the {{Wiki|world views}} [[Tibetan Buddhism]]? | ||
− | [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] boast that they have passed down an unbroken [[lineage]] of oral teachings from [[Shakyamuni Buddha]] in the fifth century B.C. to the current day. [[Thus]], [[Tibetans]] claim that theirs is perhaps the purest [[form]] of [[Buddhism]], having been isolated behind their [[Himalayan]] wall from corrupting, modernizing influences well into the twentieth century. But does the shocking {{Wiki|history}} of the [[Karmapa]] fight belie this claim? Indeed, considering the corruption that the controversy reveals among the [[lamas]], is it possible that [[Tibetan Buddhism]] is rotten to the core? To find out, I made my way to the main scene of the [[Karmapa controversy]] over a period of years by a circuitous route. | + | [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] boast that they have passed down an unbroken [[lineage]] of oral teachings from [[Shakyamuni Buddha]] in the fifth century B.C. to the current day. [[Thus]], [[Tibetans]] claim that theirs is perhaps the purest [[form]] of [[Buddhism]], having been isolated behind their [[Himalayan]] wall from corrupting, modernizing [[influences]] well into the twentieth century. But does the shocking {{Wiki|history}} of the [[Karmapa]] fight belie this claim? Indeed, considering the corruption that the controversy reveals among the [[lamas]], is it possible that [[Tibetan Buddhism]] is rotten to the core? To find out, I made my way to the main scene of the [[Karmapa controversy]] over a period of years by a circuitous route. |
− | First, I walked the streets of | + | First, I walked the streets of {{Wiki|Lhasa}}, the ancient {{Wiki|capital}} of [[Tibet]] and the holy city of [[Vajrayana Buddhism]], the [[religion]] of the [[Himalayas]]. There I learned how seamlessly and cozily [[religion]], commerce, and politics have always wrapped every [[Tibetan]] from [[birth]] until [[death]]. The great [[monasteries]] of {{Wiki|Lhasa}}, once [[masters]] over thousands of acres of fields and hundreds of peasants and herders -- each cloister now a mere shell for tourists, manned by a skeleton crew of show-monks -- showed me how much [[power]] the [[lamas]] had exerted in old [[Tibet]]. The new roads, shops, and military bases of the last four decades showed me how strong the {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[grip]] on [[Tibetan]] [[life]] is today. |
− | Afterwards, in [[India]], I started to Uncover the [[truth]] about the controversy over the [[reincarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]]. I discovered that the version that the [[Dalai]] Lama's supporters have told to Westerners was an incomplete story at best. In {{Wiki|New Delhi}}, I toured a [[Buddhist]] school that had been attacked | + | Afterwards, in [[India]], I started to Uncover the [[truth]] about the controversy over the [[reincarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]]. I discovered that the version that the [[Dalai]] Lama's supporters have told to Westerners was an incomplete story at best. In {{Wiki|New Delhi}}, I toured a [[Buddhist]] school that had been attacked to support the [[Dalai]] Lama's [[Karmapa]] candidate. I learned how [[Buddhist]] converts from the [[United States]] and {{Wiki|Europe}} had played key roles on both sides of that attack. In the old British hill town of {{Wiki|Kalimpong}} I met the other young man who claimed the title of [[Karmapa]] -- not the [[Dalai]] Lama's choice. I found that he had an [[interest]] in the [[philosophy]] of {{Wiki|Immanuel Kant}}, the [[science]] of black holes, and the film versions of The [[Lord]] of the Rings. |
− | I also learned about an investigation that had been conducted by a team of journalists from four Asian countries that revealed the deepest, darkest secret of the whole [[Karmapa]] affair. [4] This team had [[put together]] a film in the early days of handheld video cameras that documented a covert operation involving the [[Karmapa]], {{Wiki|Chinese}} state security, and perhaps even the American CIA. It would take more than a year to track down the filmmaker, who turned up in Bangkok, and get a copy of this remarkable film. | + | I also learned about an [[investigation]] that had been conducted by a team of journalists from four Asian countries that revealed the deepest, darkest secret of the whole [[Karmapa]] affair. [4] This team had [[put together]] a film in the early days of handheld video cameras that documented a covert operation involving the [[Karmapa]], {{Wiki|Chinese}} state {{Wiki|security}}, and perhaps even the American CIA. It would take more than a year to track down the filmmaker, who turned up in Bangkok, and get a copy of this remarkable film. |
− | Finally, I entered the disenchanted kingdom of [[Sikkim]] and made my way to the [[Karmapa's]] headquarters in exile: [[Rumtek monastery]]. For decades, [[Sikkim]] was a flash point for border tension between nuclear-armed rivals [[India]] and [[China]], and until recently it had been nearly off limits to foreigners. I questioned [[monks]] who lived at [[Rumtek]] now and those who had left as a result of the dispute over the seventeenth [[Karmapa]]. They were helpful, but they knew only a handful of "facts" about the [[Karmapa]] dispute, most of them untrue. It was not until I started digging through old newspapers, legal documents, and manifestoes written by both sides in the dispute -- scattered on three continents and all over the Internet -- that the story behind the [[Karmapa]] issue slowly emerged. | + | Finally, I entered the disenchanted {{Wiki|kingdom}} of [[Sikkim]] and made my way to the [[Karmapa's]] headquarters in exile: [[Rumtek monastery]]. For decades, [[Sikkim]] was a flash point for border tension between nuclear-armed rivals [[India]] and [[China]], and until recently it had been nearly off limits to foreigners. I questioned [[monks]] who lived at [[Rumtek]] now and those who had left as a result of the dispute over the seventeenth [[Karmapa]]. They were helpful, but they knew only a handful of "facts" about the [[Karmapa]] dispute, most of them untrue. It was not until I started digging through old newspapers, legal documents, and manifestoes written by both sides in the dispute -- scattered on three continents and all over the Internet -- that the story behind the [[Karmapa]] issue slowly emerged. |
− | A volume put out in {{Wiki|New Delhi}} in 1996 detailed a | + | A volume put out in {{Wiki|New Delhi}} in 1996 detailed a [[meeting]] where ordinary [[monks]] and [[Buddhist]] devotees testified to their [[experiences]] before and after the dispute became violent. [5] Their {{Wiki|voices}} spoke with heartbreaking poignancy of betrayal, {{Wiki|fear}}, and loss that was only made bearable by deep [[religious]] [[faith]]. |
− | A decision by a court in [[Sikkim]] revealed the depth of [[distrust]] that had developed between high [[lamas]] who had been raised together as children under the [[eye]] of the previous [[Karmapa]]. [6] An affidavit in another case, this [[time]] in far-away New Zealand, raised serious questions about the historical claims of the [[Dalai]] Lama's candidate. [7] A memoir of a [[Tibetan]] general from the eighteenth century painted a picture of sectarian [[religious]] conflict in old [[Tibet]] as brutal and bigoted as anything from the European Reformation and its bloody wars of [[religion]]. [8] [[Tibetans]] are not proud of this {{Wiki|history}}, and it is largely unknown to followers of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] in the West. But this legacy of conflict remains alive to today's high [[lamas]] and to the politicians of the [[Tibetan]] exile government of the [[Dalai Lama]]. | + | A decision by a court in [[Sikkim]] revealed the depth of [[distrust]] that had developed between high [[lamas]] who had been raised together as children under the [[eye]] of the previous [[Karmapa]]. [6] An affidavit in another case, this [[time]] in far-away New Zealand, raised serious questions about the historical claims of the [[Dalai]] Lama's candidate. [7] A memoir of a [[Tibetan]] general from the eighteenth century painted a picture of sectarian [[religious]] conflict in old [[Tibet]] as brutal and bigoted as anything from the European Reformation and its bloody wars of [[religion]]. [8] [[Tibetans]] are not proud of this {{Wiki|history}}, and it is largely unknown to followers of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] in the {{Wiki|West}}. But this legacy of conflict {{Wiki|remains}} alive to today's high [[lamas]] and to the politicians of the [[Tibetan]] exile government of the [[Dalai Lama]]. |
− | The main players in this drama are two young men, each claiming to be one of the highest [[masters]] in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], and each with a compelling story. But the two boys are not the only characters in this behind-the-scenes tale of [[religion]], politics, violence, and [[greed]]. They are surrounded by [[people]] with stories as vivid and compelling as their own: the previous [[incarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]], who ruled over [[Rumtek]] as a jolly autocrat until his [[death]] in 1981; his nephew [[Shamar Rinpoche]], whose previous [[reincarnations]] were banned by the [[Tibetan]] government and who, in his current [[lifetime]], became an amateur attorney, taking the case for [[Rumtek]] all the way to the [[Indian]] Supreme Court; [[Tai Situ Rinpoche]], the first [[Tibetan]] [[lama]] to win a Grammy Award and Shamar's ambitious rival for dominance at [[Rumtek]], who brought in hree governments to make the case for his boy; and of course the [[Dalai Lama]]n international celebrity and a presence always in the background at [[Rumtek]]. | + | The main players in this drama are two young men, each claiming to be one of the [[highest]] [[masters]] in [[Tibetan Buddhism]], and each with a compelling story. But the two boys are not the only characters in this behind-the-scenes tale of [[religion]], politics, violence, and [[greed]]. They are surrounded by [[people]] with stories as vivid and compelling as their own: the previous [[incarnation]] of the [[Karmapa]], who ruled over [[Rumtek]] as a jolly autocrat until his [[death]] in 1981; his nephew [[Shamar Rinpoche]], whose previous [[reincarnations]] were banned by the [[Tibetan]] government and who, in his current [[lifetime]], became an amateur attorney, taking the case for [[Rumtek]] all the way to the [[Indian]] Supreme Court; [[Tai Situ Rinpoche]], the first [[Tibetan]] [[lama]] to win a Grammy Award and Shamar's ambitious rival for dominance at [[Rumtek]], who brought in hree governments to make the case for his boy; and of course the [[Dalai Lama]]n international celebrity and a presence always in the background at [[Rumtek]]. |
Surprisingly, all these men, born in the {{Wiki|medieval}} {{Wiki|society}} that was [[Tibet]] before 1959 and raised as [[monks]] in a rarefied [[world]] of butter-lamps, [[sacred]] [[chanting]], and mandarin protocol, had become cosmopolitans at ease with adoring foreign devotees from {{Wiki|Hong Kong}} to {{Wiki|London}}, from Biarritz to Beverly Hills. Most of them were used to dealing with, and sometimes manipulating, the international press as well. | Surprisingly, all these men, born in the {{Wiki|medieval}} {{Wiki|society}} that was [[Tibet]] before 1959 and raised as [[monks]] in a rarefied [[world]] of butter-lamps, [[sacred]] [[chanting]], and mandarin protocol, had become cosmopolitans at ease with adoring foreign devotees from {{Wiki|Hong Kong}} to {{Wiki|London}}, from Biarritz to Beverly Hills. Most of them were used to dealing with, and sometimes manipulating, the international press as well. | ||
− | Another irony: The principal [[lamas]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] fled from the {{Wiki|Chinese}} occupation of their homeland in 1959. Yet, a couple of decades later, many of them had begun to shuttle back and forth between [[China]] and "exile," restoring their [[monasteries]] in [[Tibet]] and helping to revitalize [[Buddhism]] there. The line between | + | Another irony: The principal [[lamas]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] fled from the {{Wiki|Chinese}} occupation of their homeland in 1959. Yet, a couple of decades later, many of them had begun to shuttle back and forth between [[China]] and "exile," restoring their [[monasteries]] in [[Tibet]] and helping to revitalize [[Buddhism]] there. The line between enemy and friend began to blur considerably in politics as played by [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]]. |
− | [[Buddha's]] Not Smiling is the anatomy of a crisis. [[Buddhism]], and particularly its [[Tibetan]] variety, has begun to spread long, leafy branches out into the West, placing our [[spiritual]] landscape under its expanding shadow. But if we dig beneath the topsoil, do we find that its [[roots]] are infected with incurable rot? As [[Buddhism]] is now the fastest growing major [[religion]] in the West, so the [[Tibetan]] variety, known as the [[Vajrayana]], has become Buddhism's most popular [[path]]. [9] In turn, of the five [[religious]] schools of [[Tibet]], the most widespread is the [[Karma Kagyu]], whose leader is the [[Karmapa]]. The dispute behind his [[recognition]] exposes deep corruption at the [[heart]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] today. | + | [[Buddha's]] Not Smiling is the anatomy of a crisis. [[Buddhism]], and particularly its [[Tibetan]] variety, has begun to spread long, leafy branches out into the {{Wiki|West}}, placing our [[spiritual]] landscape under its expanding shadow. But if we dig beneath the topsoil, do we find that its [[roots]] are infected with incurable rot? As [[Buddhism]] is now the fastest growing major [[religion]] in the {{Wiki|West}}, so the [[Tibetan]] variety, known as the [[Vajrayana]], has become Buddhism's most popular [[path]]. [9] In turn, of the five [[religious]] schools of [[Tibet]], the most widespread is the [[Karma Kagyu]], whose leader is the [[Karmapa]]. The dispute behind his [[recognition]] exposes deep corruption at the [[heart]] of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] today. |
− | The {{Wiki|Chinese}} Communists tried to | + | The {{Wiki|Chinese}} Communists tried to destroy the practice of [[Buddhism]] in [[Tibet]]. But confronted with the stubborn piety of the {{Wiki|Tibetan people}}, the Communists failed. For more than a decade; the battle for [[Rumtek]] has raised rancor among supposedly [[compassionate]] [[Tibetan]] [[lamas]] and their students. It has led allegedly non-violent [[Buddhists]] to insult, to denounce, and to {{Wiki|physically}} attack each other. Will the [[lamas]], living in exile, now kill off [[Buddhism]] themselves, finishing the job that the {{Wiki|Chinese}} started? |
Latest revision as of 13:58, 30 September 2013
Thanks to Ed Worthy for his detailed comments and suggestions on my manuscript. Thanks to Karine Le Pajolec, Harrison Pemberton, and Thule Jug of Vienna Dharma Photos for use of photographs. Thanks also to others who helped in various ways along the way: Terry Burt, Derek Hanger, Brett and Amanda Hood, Carol Gerhardt, Jay Landman, Hannah Nydahl, Harrison Pemberton, and Stephanie Yang. I am grateful to Gerry Stowers for her friendship and support during the process of revising my manuscript and producing this book. All errors are solely the responsibility of the author.
CAST OF CHARACTERS
The Karmapa
THE 16TH GYALWA KARMAPA. RANGJUNG RIGPE DORJE (1924-81)
The spiritual leader of the Karma Kagyu school of Tibetan Buddhism until his death. He led the Karma Kagyu lamas; escape from Chinese forces in 1959 and established his headquarters in exile at Rumtek monastery in Sikkim, now a state of northeastern India.
The Candidates for 17th Karmapa
OGYEN TRINLEY DORJE ALSO KNOWN AS URGYEN THINLEY (1985-)
Recognized by Tai Situ and supported by both the Dalai Lama and the Chinese government. Born of a nomad family in eastern Tibet, he was enthroned in Tibet in 1992 and resettled in 2000 in Himachal Pradesh state in northwestern India.
TRINLEY THAYE DORJE (1983-)
Recognized by Shamar Rinpoche. He was born in Lhasa, escaped Tibet in 1994, and is now completing his education in Kalimpong in the Himalaya foothills of northeastern India.
Supporters of Ogyen Trinley
THE 14TH DALAI LAMA, TENZIN GYATSO (1935-)
The spiritual leader of the Gelugpa school of Tibetan Buddhism and the political leader of the Tibetan people living in exile. Since winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989, he has become the international face of human rights, nonviolence, and Buddhist teachings. He is based at Dharamsala in Himachal Pradesh state, located in the Himalayan foothills of northwestern India.
THE 12TH TAI SITU RINPOCHE ALSO KNOWN AS THE SITUPA (1954-)
The third-ranking spiritual leader of the Karma Kagyu school. Tai Situ is the primary supporter of Ogyen Trinley and originally presented the boy on the basis of a prediction letter that became the subject of dispute. He served on the Council of Regents and then on the Karmapa Search Committee at Rumtek. His monastic seat is located in Bir, in Himachal Pradesh in northwestern India.
THE 12TH GOSHIR, GYALTSAB RINPOCHE (1954-)
The fifth-ranking lama in the Karma Kagyu hierarchy. He is the second main supporter of Ogyen Trinley after Tai Situ. He served on the Council of Regents and then on the Karmapa Search Committee at Rumtek. He is based in India's northeastern state of Sikkim, near the sixteenth Karmapa's monastery at Rumtek.
KHENCHEN THRANGU RINPOCHE
The abbot of Rumtek monastery in Sikkim and head philosophy teacher there until he left to establish his own monasteries in 1975.
TENZIN NAMGYAL
Assistant secretary of Rumtek monastery until dismissed in 1988. A layman, he was married to the sister of Thrangu Rinpoche until his death in 2005.
AKONG RINPOCHE
The aide of Tai Situ. With a Swiss follower, he runs the Rokpa Foundation, dedicated to relief work in the Himalayan countries. He is based in Scotland.
NAR BAHADUR BHANDARI
Chief minister of India's northeastern state of Sikkim during the years 1979-84 and 1985-1994.
Supporters of Thaye Dorje
THE 14TH SHAMAR RINPOCHE, ALSO KNOWN AS THE SHAMARPA (1952-)
Traditionally known as the "Red-Hat Karmapa," the Shamarpas are the second-ranking spiritual leaders in the Karma Kagyu school. The current Shamar is the primary supporter of Thaye Dorje and is based in Kalimpong, in northeastern India. He served on the Council of Regents and then on the Karmapa Search Committee at Rumtek.
TOPGA YUGYAL RINPOCHE
General secretary of the Karmapa's administration from 1983 until his death in 1997.
JIGME RINPOCHE
The elder brother of Shamar Rinpoche. Since the mid-1970s he has run two large monasteries established by the sixteenth Karmapa in France.
KHENPO CHODRAK TENPHEL RINPOCHE
The abbot of Rumtek from 1978 until the monastery was taken over by followers of Karmapa candidate Ogyen Trinley in 1993.He is now based in New Delhi.
OLE AND HANNAH NYDAHL
A Danish couple who became some of the first Western students of the sixteenth Karmapa and went on to start more than four hundred Buddhist centers in Europe and throughout the West.
MAP
PREFACE
This book is about corruption in Tibetan Buddhism, but not about sex scandals. We have already seen discussions about Buddhist teachers, particularly well known Zen masters and Tibetan lamas, having romantic affairs with their students, especially those from Western countries. [1] This is nothing new, and it afflicts Buddhism as it does all other major religions. Here, I do not touch on this topic.
Instead, I explore a type of corruption that I believe is much more insidious, and whose exposure can be of much greater benefit to people seeking to find meaning in their lives through a spiritual path, or just trying to understand the massive phenomenon that Tibetan Buddhism has become in the past thirty years. This book is a history of a dispute among the highest lamas with roots centuries in the past and a present of deep shame. It is a dispute over the identity of a lama called the Karmapa.
I have been a student of Buddhism for a decade. I was inspired by this ancient path's time-tested methods to escape suffering, and by the example of compassionate living offered by Tibetan lamas. A few years ago, when I first heard how spiritual leaders who stand for love, peace, and nonviolence had behaved in this dispute I was shocked and disillusioned. Were Tibetan lamas just hypocrites and charlatans? If this was so, I would have been ready to give up Buddhism altogether. The only way I could remain was to discover the facts for myself.
So that's what I set out to do. In the process, I discovered a dark side to some Tibetan lamas. But I also developed a confidence in the basic teachings of a spiritual tradition that was more mature, based on my own 'investigation, rather than merely on hopeful faith. I believe that this journey did me much good, and helped me grow intellectually and spiritually. I hope the reader will take much the same journey in these pages, and discover some of the same benefit along the way.
For the past three years, I have been a student of one of the main lamas involved in the controversy, Shamar Rinpoche. Thus I cannot claim to be a disinterested outsider. Shamar even suggested that I write this book. Four books have already come out in the last few years sympathetic to the views of his opponents. [2] These books raised many questions for me about the purity of Tibetan Buddhism, and I am sure they raised the same questions for many others. So it seemed only fair to investigate Shamar's claims and give him a chance to tell his story. The following pages try to disentangle the many knots in the web of claims, counterclaims, and outright deceptions that have come to enshroud the topic of the Karmapa today.
Two young men are at the center of our story, and both of them claim to be the Karmapa. The four most recent books on the subject all refer to one of the young men as "the Karmapa" while calling the other by his enthronement name, the equivalent of a personal name. Here, I begin from the premise of an authentic controversy, so I do not presume to know which candidate is the genuine reincarnate. Accordingly, I do not call either candidate "the Karmapa." Instead, I refer to each young lama by his enthronement name. I hope this will make for a fairer presentation that is also clearer for the reader.
I would like to invite you, the reader, to make your own judgment on the specific issue of this book -- the story of the Karmapa. Considering the evidence, whom do you believe and whom do you trust! After that, it may be fruitful to consider how this connects to your attitude about Tibetan Buddhism and spiritual teachers in general. finally, if you follow a spiritual tradition, or if you know someone who does, then I encourage you to meditate on what it means to follow a spiritual teacher with maturity, as an intelligent person in the modern world. Is it possible to balance faith and logical thinking! Does rationality conflict with faith, or can rationality enrich faith! When should we just believe, and when should we ask questions!
If you can prove any of my claims wrong please contact me directly, I will correct them in future editions.
INTRODUCTION
Reincarnating Lamas
Near the beginning of Martin Scorsese's 1997 film Kundun, a search party from Lhasa arrives at a small village in the dusty northeastern borderlands between Tibet and China. The time is the late 1930s. The visitors are looking for a boy who they think might be the reincarnation of the thirteenth Dalai Lama Thubten Gyatso (1876·1933), who died a few years earlier.
Before his death, the Tibetan leader had left a letter, written in an obscure poetic style, indicating the family and place of his rebirth. Following their late lama's instructions, and consulting intelligence reports, the Dalai Lama's administration in Lhasa had put together a list of likely boys -- candidates for the Dalai Lama's reincarnation.
Now, the Lhasa lamas have come to a remote province to investigate one of these boys, the son of a peasant family. Disguised as traders, they have not divulged the purpose of their mission to the small boy or to his parents. The lamas have brought personal items of the deceased Dalai Lama to test the boy. Inside the family's rustic. house, they spread these items out on a table and mix them together with newer, fancier versions of each object.
The parents bring in their boy and the disguised lamas invite him to choose "his" belongings -- those which belonged to the thirteenth Dalai Lama. Unprompted, the boy correctly chooses the Dalai Lama's rosary, ritual drum, and walking stick, leaving the more attractive, newer ones on the table. The boy has passed the test: he is the genuine reincarnation of the thirteenth Dalai Lama. Convinced, the lamas prostrate to the boy, and address him as "Kundun," a title of respect for the Tibetan leader.
Buddhists everywhere believe that humans and all other beings die and then are reborn again and again in endless reincarnations, until they reach the state of enlightenment. Enlightenment, or nirvana, is the end of all suffering and the goal of Buddhism. Buddhists believe that enlightenment is reached by developing perfect wisdom and compassion through following the Noble Eightfold Path of correct view, goal, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and meditation.
Siddhartha Gautama, a prince of the Shakya clan that ruled one of the small kingdoms in the Himalayan foothills of northern India in the sixth century B.C., set the example when he renounced palace life and took to the road as a wandering ascetic. After years of fruitless practices, one day the young man sat down on a pile of grass under a large leafy tree by the Naranjana River. He determined not to rise from his seat until he surmounted all craving, thus liberating himself from the need to be reborn again in the physical world. He meditated through the night, resisted all the blandishments and threats of Mara, the lord of death, and as the sun rose, the young man reached enlightenment, thus becoming the Buddha or Enlightened One.
Known as Shakyamuni or the Sage of the Shakyas, the Buddha spent the next forty years traveling around northern India, giving sermons on the way out of suffering, and gaining disciples. He formed a community of monks, and later, an order of nuns, creating the Buddhist sangha of ordained practitioners. As needed, the Buddha came up with rules to ensure the harmony of the sangha, and his disciples codified these as the Vinaya. At age eighty, he died at Kushinagara, giving a final teaching on the impermanence of all beings and things, including the Buddha himself. After his death, the Buddha's disciples carried on the work of the monastic sangha and passed along the Buddha's teachings as the sutras.
After a couple of centuries, Buddhism began to divide into three main approaches, or paths. Much like Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant [[Wikipedia:Christianity|Christianity]], each path of Buddhism is defined by its religious practice as well as by the geographical areas it came to occupy.
The Theravada, or "Teaching of the Elders," developed out of one of the early Buddhist schools of India, and taught the value of ascetic monastic practice in order to become an arhat, a "worthy one" who has freed him- or herself from all worldly craving and from the endless cycle of birth and death known as samsara. Theravada Buddhism can be traced to the third century B.C. and is found today in the nations of south and Southeast Asia, including Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Burma.
Some early Buddhists criticized a focus on one's own salvation, not explicitly thinking of others, as inherently selfish and dubbed it the Hinayana or "Narrow Path." As an alternative, in the first century B.C. teachers began to present the Mahayana or "Great Path," in which altruism became the path to enlightenment. Mahayana practitioners sought to become bodhisattvas, beings whose every thought, word, and deed was dedicated to saving all beings from suffering. Today, the Mahayana is found in East Asian countries including China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam.
The path of the bodhisattva was said to be a sure path to enlightenment, but was also said to take millions of lifetimes to achieve. In the middle of the first millennium A.D., adepts in north and northwestern India came upon a more powerful approach, one they said could bring enlightenment in one lifetime, the Vajrayana, or "Diamond Path." Vajrayana or Tantric practitioners sought to save themselves and all beings by realizing the enlightened qualities in their own cravings and illusions. Indian missionaries brought this supercharged version of the Mahayana over the Himalayas to Tibet beginning in the eighth century.
While all Buddhists believe in rebirth, only in the Himalayas did people come to believe that their highest spiritual teachers consciously chose to return to teach their students, lifetime after lifetime.
According to Vajrayana belief, after death, these teachers were reborn as reincarnate lamas, or tulkus, whose boundless compassion led them to postpone the bliss of enlightenment until all living beings would be liberated as well. The tulku is the Himalayan embodiment of the Mahayana ideal of the bodhisattva, but the tulku system is found in no other branch of Buddhism and in no other major religion. It is unique to Vajrayana Buddhism, and since its origin in the thirteenth century, the tulku ideal has been an important source of power, purity, and authenticity in the Diamond Path.
One practical advantage of the tulku system at its inception was to take politics out of deciding who would lead a monastery after its last leader's death. Previously, in Tibet, powerful aristocratic patrons would use their influence to get one of their sons appointed to lead a monastery. This effectively put the cloisters under the control of local landowners and warlords and made the religious centers subject to the rivalry of competing families. These families involved lamas in their political conflicts and disrupted the monasteries' spiritual work. The tulku system promised to solve this problem. Over eight centuries that followed, reincarnate lamas became the bedrock of Tibetan religion and the foundation of the largest monastic system on earth.
Today, in Tibetan Buddhism, there are hundreds of lamas reputed to be tulkus. The Dalai Lama -- the current incarnation Tenzin Gyatso is the fourteenth of his line -- is the most famous tulku of Tibet. But he and his thirteen predecessors were not the first lamas said to take rebirth intentionally to continue their work as bodhisattvas. The first tulku of Tibet was a lama known as the Karmapa.
In the twelfth century, the first Karmapa Dusum Khyenpa predicted that he would return to teach his students and manage his monastery in his next lifetime. And sure enough, when Dusum Khyenpa died, his students located a boy who showed signs that he was the reincarnation of the Karmapa. The boy was named Karma Pakshi and when he was old enough, he inherited control over the Karmapa's cloister and his activities. From then on, the Karmapa's monastery was relatively free of control by local noble families. Being able to choose their own leader, the Karmapa's lamas became masters of their own destiny.
Impressed by the success of this system, other monasteries copied it as a means to choose their own top lamas. Thus, over a period of a couple centuries, power shifted in Tibet from land-owning families to the lamas. who managed the most powerful monasteries. The most revered tulkus attracted donations and students, developing monastic empires and political power of their own. As tulkus became major political leaders in their regions, lama-rule in Tibet reached its apex. In the late fourteenth century, nearly three centuries after the first Karmapa, the Dalai Lamas would appear. Two centuries after that, in 1642, the fifth Dalai Lama would take over the throne of central Tibet from a dynasty of secular kings.
Outsiders might think that tulkus were always chosen according to set procedures laid down to ensure the accuracy of the result -- that the child located would be the genuine reincarnation of the dead master, as in the scene from the movie Kundun. But in Tibetan history, tulku searches were not always conducted in such a pure way. Because reincarnating lamas inherited great wealth and power from their predecessors they became the center of many political disputes.
Tulkus were often recognized based on non-religious factors. Sometimes monastic officials wanted a child from a powerful local noble family to give their cloister more political clout. Other times, they wanted a child from a lower-class family that would have little leverage to influence the child's upbringing. In yet other situations, the desires of the monastic officials took second place to external politics. A local warlord, the Chinese emperor, or even the Dalai Lama's government in Lhasa might try to impose its choice of tulku on a monastery for political reasons.
Only the strongest monastic administrations had the ability to resist such external pressures, and the Karmapa's monastery was one of these. Sixteen Karmapas were recognized by the Karmapa's own monastery without participation from outsiders. Only in one instance, when the sixteenth Karmapa was recognized in the 19205, did the Tibetan government of the thirteenth Dalai Lama try to intervene in choosing a Karmapa. In that case, as we will see later. the government ultimately had to back down.
When the highest lamas fled Tibet along with nearly a hundred thousand refugees from Chinese rule in 1959, the lamas reestablished their monasteries in exile. The sixteenth Karmapa built the monastery of Rumtek in the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Sikkim, which became a state of India in 1975.
After the sixteenth Karmapa died in 1981, the lamas who ran Rumtek clashed with other lamas from the Karmapa's Karma Kagyu school of Buddhism over finding his reincarnation, the seventeenth Karmapa. In 1992, two high-ranking lamas enthroned a boy of their choosing in Tibet against the wishes of the previous Karmapa's administration at Rumtek. To his credit, this boy had powerful friends and enjoyed the support of the Dalai Lama and, surprisingly, the Chinese government as well. But this was not enough to convince the administration of Rumtek to accept him. So, with the help of local state police and paramilitary forces, the two renegade lamas and their followers took over the monastery in 1993, replaced the administration with their own people, and then proclaimed their boy the new Karmapa.
In response, the lama who had been in control of Rumtek but was ousted in 1993 installed his own boy in India the following year. Thus there came to be two Karmapa candidates, two boys taking their places in a struggle to control the largest school of Tibetan Buddhism that has continued to the present day.
Loyalty vs. Religious Freedom
The dispute over the identity of the Karmapa is a bewildering mix of religion, geopolitics, and infighting among exiled Tibetan lamas. It is a complex story, not easy to untangle from the outside. For outsiders, the story is troubling from the beginning. It shows Tibetan lamas in a very negative light. It also shows Tibetans disagreeing with the Dalai Lama. We are used to hearing the Dalai Lama described as the "spiritual leader of Tibet." Given that, do the claims of the Tibetans who dispute his selection of the Karmapa have any merit? And, if so, should their story affect the way we view the Dalai Lama?
Since the first Dalai Lama appeared, his successors have been the effective leaders of the Gelug, one of the five religious schools of Tibet. [1] Starting in 1642, the Dalai Lamas were also the political rulers of the central provinces of the huge area now called Tibet, an area I will refer to as Central Tibet. This gave the Dalai Lamas a mix of religious and political authority that has been difficult for historians to sort out. Were the Dalai Lamas the recognized leaders of all the religious groups of Tibet? And is the current Dalai Lama the religious leader of all Tibetans today? His supporters say yes. But many Tibetans disagree. They hold that the four religious schools outside of the Dalai Lama's own Gelug governed themselves autonomously back in Tibet -- and that they continue to run their own affairs today, without reference to the authority of the Dalai Lama.
In 1959 the Dalai Lama fled Tibet for exile to India and he took his government ministers with him. Ever since, he and his officials have run an exile government in India whose main goal has been to regain influence in Tibet. Until the late eighties, the Dalai Lama demanded independence for his people from China. After that goal came to seem unattainable, he moderated his demand to autonomy for Tibetans within China. Over nearly half a century living in the free world, the Dalai Lama has learned much about the grim realities of geopolitics. He has also imbibed concepts such as human rights and religious freedom. These ideas were unknown in old Tibet, yet the Dalai Lama has skillfully adopted these modern concepts in his own quest to gain more freedom for Tibetans.
"When we demand the rights and freedoms we so cherish we should also be aware of our responsibilities. If we accept that others have an equal right to peace and happiness as ourselves, do we not have a responsibility to help those in need?" the Dalai Lama asked in a speech at the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna in 1993. "The rich diversity of cultures and religions should help to strengthen the fundamental human rights in all communities. Because underlying this diversity are fundamental principles that bind us all as members of the same human family. Diversity and traditions can never justify the violations of human rights." [2]
In perhaps his biggest challenge, the Dalai Lama has had to walk a fine line to maintain his integrity as a Buddhist lama while also running an exile government. As there are chauvinists of Chinese nationalism, or of any other group's attempts to advance itself, so there are chauvinists of Tibetan nationalism. And as there is dissent among any group, so Tibetans in exile hold a range of views on how best to advance Tibetan nationalism and preserve Tibetan Buddhism.
Some exiled Tibetans fear that Tibetan religion will die without a Tibetan national state to actively promote the Tibetan language along with Tibet's distinctive culture and customs. These Tibetans are most likely to argue that Buddhism should serve politics, and that bringing Tibetans together into a coherent, united people is more important than ensuring that the variety of lineages and practices of Tibetan religion can flourish in the contemporary world. For many Tibetans, loyalty to the Dalai Lama effectively trumps religious freedom, though they might not put it so bluntly. Instead, they might speak of "unity" -- how important it is to unify all Tibetans behind the Dalai Lama.
Yet other Tibetans feel that Buddhism can live on in Chinese Tibet as long as there can be a separation of church and state. Still others see a bright future for Buddhism in the world outside of Tibet. In our exploration of the Karmapa issue, we will meet Tibetans and outsiders who embrace each of these views. We will also consider the purpose of Tibetan Buddhism. Important questions arise: Should religion bring all Tibetans together and promote a free Tibet and world peace in general? Or does religion have another purpose, to help people reach their individual happiness through their own faith and diligence, irrespective of race, culture, and language?
Digging up Skeletons
Sometimes Tibetans and their foreign supporters tend to project an image of old Tibet and Tibetan exiles today as relatively free of sectarian strife. This is understandable, since a positive image has gone a long way towards creating worldwide interest in the Tibetan cause, interest that other refugee groups have not been able to garner for themselves. "Unity of the Church is ideally and practically valued in exile, and great efforts are made by the Tibetan (exile) government to display unity, especially through the Private and Information Offices (of the Dalai Lama in India)." [3] Criticisms, whether from Tibetans or outsiders, are often strongly rejected as harmful to the cause of Tibetan unity and thus, of Tibetan freedom and human rights in China.
Many writers have discussed the problems of Tibet under the Chinese and the Tibetan freedom movement that arose in response. Our story is more concerned with how politics within the Tibetan community has affected Buddhism. However much we may sympathize with the Dalai Lama or the plight of the Tibetan people under Chinese rule, we should not be too quick to smooth over serious conflicts among the leading Tibetan lamas themselves.
This book explores the Karmapa controversy as a case study of the corruption that has infected Tibetan Buddhism in-exile, as normal human emotions have been unleashed without the traditional strictures of life in Tibet to restrain them. It is a story of spiritual leaders involved in violence, deceit, murder -- and even litigation. Should this story affect how the world views Tibetan Buddhism?
Tibetan lamas boast that they have passed down an unbroken lineage of oral teachings from Shakyamuni Buddha in the fifth century B.C. to the current day. Thus, Tibetans claim that theirs is perhaps the purest form of Buddhism, having been isolated behind their Himalayan wall from corrupting, modernizing influences well into the twentieth century. But does the shocking history of the Karmapa fight belie this claim? Indeed, considering the corruption that the controversy reveals among the lamas, is it possible that Tibetan Buddhism is rotten to the core? To find out, I made my way to the main scene of the Karmapa controversy over a period of years by a circuitous route.
First, I walked the streets of Lhasa, the ancient capital of Tibet and the holy city of Vajrayana Buddhism, the religion of the Himalayas. There I learned how seamlessly and cozily religion, commerce, and politics have always wrapped every Tibetan from birth until death. The great monasteries of Lhasa, once masters over thousands of acres of fields and hundreds of peasants and herders -- each cloister now a mere shell for tourists, manned by a skeleton crew of show-monks -- showed me how much power the lamas had exerted in old Tibet. The new roads, shops, and military bases of the last four decades showed me how strong the Chinese grip on Tibetan life is today.
Afterwards, in India, I started to Uncover the truth about the controversy over the reincarnation of the Karmapa. I discovered that the version that the Dalai Lama's supporters have told to Westerners was an incomplete story at best. In New Delhi, I toured a Buddhist school that had been attacked to support the Dalai Lama's Karmapa candidate. I learned how Buddhist converts from the United States and Europe had played key roles on both sides of that attack. In the old British hill town of Kalimpong I met the other young man who claimed the title of Karmapa -- not the Dalai Lama's choice. I found that he had an interest in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, the science of black holes, and the film versions of The Lord of the Rings.
I also learned about an investigation that had been conducted by a team of journalists from four Asian countries that revealed the deepest, darkest secret of the whole Karmapa affair. [4] This team had put together a film in the early days of handheld video cameras that documented a covert operation involving the Karmapa, Chinese state security, and perhaps even the American CIA. It would take more than a year to track down the filmmaker, who turned up in Bangkok, and get a copy of this remarkable film.
Finally, I entered the disenchanted kingdom of Sikkim and made my way to the Karmapa's headquarters in exile: Rumtek monastery. For decades, Sikkim was a flash point for border tension between nuclear-armed rivals India and China, and until recently it had been nearly off limits to foreigners. I questioned monks who lived at Rumtek now and those who had left as a result of the dispute over the seventeenth Karmapa. They were helpful, but they knew only a handful of "facts" about the Karmapa dispute, most of them untrue. It was not until I started digging through old newspapers, legal documents, and manifestoes written by both sides in the dispute -- scattered on three continents and all over the Internet -- that the story behind the Karmapa issue slowly emerged.
A volume put out in New Delhi in 1996 detailed a meeting where ordinary monks and Buddhist devotees testified to their experiences before and after the dispute became violent. [5] Their voices spoke with heartbreaking poignancy of betrayal, fear, and loss that was only made bearable by deep religious faith.
A decision by a court in Sikkim revealed the depth of distrust that had developed between high lamas who had been raised together as children under the eye of the previous Karmapa. [6] An affidavit in another case, this time in far-away New Zealand, raised serious questions about the historical claims of the Dalai Lama's candidate. [7] A memoir of a Tibetan general from the eighteenth century painted a picture of sectarian religious conflict in old Tibet as brutal and bigoted as anything from the European Reformation and its bloody wars of religion. [8] Tibetans are not proud of this history, and it is largely unknown to followers of Tibetan Buddhism in the West. But this legacy of conflict remains alive to today's high lamas and to the politicians of the Tibetan exile government of the Dalai Lama.
The main players in this drama are two young men, each claiming to be one of the highest masters in Tibetan Buddhism, and each with a compelling story. But the two boys are not the only characters in this behind-the-scenes tale of religion, politics, violence, and greed. They are surrounded by people with stories as vivid and compelling as their own: the previous incarnation of the Karmapa, who ruled over Rumtek as a jolly autocrat until his death in 1981; his nephew Shamar Rinpoche, whose previous reincarnations were banned by the Tibetan government and who, in his current lifetime, became an amateur attorney, taking the case for Rumtek all the way to the Indian Supreme Court; Tai Situ Rinpoche, the first Tibetan lama to win a Grammy Award and Shamar's ambitious rival for dominance at Rumtek, who brought in hree governments to make the case for his boy; and of course the Dalai Laman international celebrity and a presence always in the background at Rumtek.
Surprisingly, all these men, born in the medieval society that was Tibet before 1959 and raised as monks in a rarefied world of butter-lamps, sacred chanting, and mandarin protocol, had become cosmopolitans at ease with adoring foreign devotees from Hong Kong to London, from Biarritz to Beverly Hills. Most of them were used to dealing with, and sometimes manipulating, the international press as well.
Another irony: The principal lamas of Tibetan Buddhism fled from the Chinese occupation of their homeland in 1959. Yet, a couple of decades later, many of them had begun to shuttle back and forth between China and "exile," restoring their monasteries in Tibet and helping to revitalize Buddhism there. The line between enemy and friend began to blur considerably in politics as played by Tibetan lamas.
Buddha's Not Smiling is the anatomy of a crisis. Buddhism, and particularly its Tibetan variety, has begun to spread long, leafy branches out into the West, placing our spiritual landscape under its expanding shadow. But if we dig beneath the topsoil, do we find that its roots are infected with incurable rot? As Buddhism is now the fastest growing major religion in the West, so the Tibetan variety, known as the Vajrayana, has become Buddhism's most popular path. [9] In turn, of the five religious schools of Tibet, the most widespread is the Karma Kagyu, whose leader is the Karmapa. The dispute behind his recognition exposes deep corruption at the heart of Tibetan Buddhism today.
The Chinese Communists tried to destroy the practice of Buddhism in Tibet. But confronted with the stubborn piety of the Tibetan people, the Communists failed. For more than a decade; the battle for Rumtek has raised rancor among supposedly compassionate Tibetan lamas and their students. It has led allegedly non-violent Buddhists to insult, to denounce, and to physically attack each other. Will the lamas, living in exile, now kill off Buddhism themselves, finishing the job that the Chinese started?