Difference between revisions of "Judgement"
m (Text replace - "righteous" to "righteous") |
m (1 revision: Robo text replace 30 sept) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Making [[judgements]] about the [[people]] we come into [[contact]] with is usually done within the privacy of our own [[minds]]. However, it will [[influence]] how we think about them – whether with [[respect]] or [[contempt]], [[trust]] or [[suspicion]], like, dislike or [[indifference]]. And, of course, the opinion we [[form]] about them from our [[judgements]] will in turn [[influence]] how we treat them. This [[being]] the case, we should be careful in making [[judgements]] about others, particularly critical ones. | Making [[judgements]] about the [[people]] we come into [[contact]] with is usually done within the privacy of our own [[minds]]. However, it will [[influence]] how we think about them – whether with [[respect]] or [[contempt]], [[trust]] or [[suspicion]], like, dislike or [[indifference]]. And, of course, the opinion we [[form]] about them from our [[judgements]] will in turn [[influence]] how we treat them. This [[being]] the case, we should be careful in making [[judgements]] about others, particularly critical ones. | ||
| − | Perhaps it would be appropriate to also mention a type of judging which mainly concerns [[Buddhists]]. There is a certain type of [[Buddhist]] who takes considerable interest in pontificating about what type of [[kamma]] a [[person]] must have done to be [[reborn]] in their present circumstances, or about where they will be [[reborn]] as a result of how they are [[acting]] now. Such speculating can only ever be at best a poor guess. The [[Buddha]] said that trying to work out the subtle and interconnected workings of [[kamma]] would be enough to drive an [[ordinary person]] mad (A.II,80). This is not because the functioning of [[kamma]] is ambiguous, but because we can never really [[know]] what is going on in other peoples’ [[minds]], their motives or even the full range of their [[actions]]. When the [[Buddha]] [[heard]] that the lay [[disciple]] [[Migasāla]] was confidently claiming that several [[people]] who had recently [[died]] were [[reborn]] in certain circumstances, he said: ‘Who is this [[Migasāla]] ... | + | Perhaps it would be appropriate to also mention a type of judging which mainly concerns [[Buddhists]]. There is a certain type of [[Buddhist]] who takes considerable interest in pontificating about what type of [[kamma]] a [[person]] must have done to be [[reborn]] in their present circumstances, or about where they will be [[reborn]] as a result of how they are [[acting]] now. Such speculating can only ever be at best a poor guess. The [[Buddha]] said that trying to work out the subtle and interconnected workings of [[kamma]] would be enough to drive an [[ordinary person]] mad (A.II,80). This is not because the functioning of [[kamma]] is ambiguous, but because we can never really [[know]] what is going on in other peoples’ [[minds]], their motives or even the full range of their [[actions]]. When the [[Buddha]] [[heard]] that the lay [[disciple]] [[Migasāla]] was confidently claiming that several [[people]] who had recently [[died]] were [[reborn]] in certain circumstances, he said: ‘Who is this [[Migasāla]] ... to know the complexity of the [[human]] character?’ Then he added: ‘Do not be a judge of others, do not judge others. Whoever judges others digs a pit for themselves.’ (A.III,351). |
Apart from the distinct possibility that the [[judgements]] we make about [[people]] may be wrong, judging others may also be a symptom of, or give rise to, smugness and [[self]]-[[righteousness]]. It may even be a way of deflecting [[attention]] from our own [[moral]] weaknesses and failings. Nonetheless, there are many situations in [[life]] where we are required to make judgments about [[people]] – whether a babysitter is competent to look after our child, whether the [[person]] who asks to borrow [[money]] from us genuinely intends to return it, whether the mechanic who says he can repair our car really can. What can we do to ensure that our [[judgements]] reflect [[reality]] so that we can make more {{Wiki|intelligent}} choices? The [[Buddha]] [[offered]] this [[sound]] and sensible advice: ‘To make a quick [[judgement]] does not make one right. The [[wise]] [[person]] looks at both sides of the matter, with fairness, impartiality, watchful of the [[truth]], wisely and without haste. Such a [[person]] is called righteous.’ (Dhp.256-7). | Apart from the distinct possibility that the [[judgements]] we make about [[people]] may be wrong, judging others may also be a symptom of, or give rise to, smugness and [[self]]-[[righteousness]]. It may even be a way of deflecting [[attention]] from our own [[moral]] weaknesses and failings. Nonetheless, there are many situations in [[life]] where we are required to make judgments about [[people]] – whether a babysitter is competent to look after our child, whether the [[person]] who asks to borrow [[money]] from us genuinely intends to return it, whether the mechanic who says he can repair our car really can. What can we do to ensure that our [[judgements]] reflect [[reality]] so that we can make more {{Wiki|intelligent}} choices? The [[Buddha]] [[offered]] this [[sound]] and sensible advice: ‘To make a quick [[judgement]] does not make one right. The [[wise]] [[person]] looks at both sides of the matter, with fairness, impartiality, watchful of the [[truth]], wisely and without haste. Such a [[person]] is called righteous.’ (Dhp.256-7). | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The first thing the [[Buddha]] recommended here is not to make [[judgements]] hastily or impulsively ([[asāhana]]). Most things, [[people]] included, are multifaceted and take [[time]] to reveal themselves to us fully. Likewise, [[knowledge]] about something usually comes at the end of a process of accumulating {{Wiki|data}}. Consequently, it is safe to say that any [[judgement]] made in haste is likely to be wrong, or at least partial. If things are multifaceted it follows that they may well appear different according to the perspective they are observed from and thus the [[Buddha]] advised us to ‘look at both sides of the matter’ (''[[atthaṃ anatthañ ca ubho niccheyya]]''). Getting the opinion of the different parties in a dispute, taking into account a person’s good points and not just their failings, considering that the [[person]] who was rude to us might have had a bad day and that he is not usually like that, would all be examples of this. The qualities of fairness (''[[dhammena]]'') and impartiality ('''[[sāma]]''') are not always easy to define but an important [[element]] of both is equality of treatment. It is always prudent not to overemphasize some facts more than others, to take into account all the evidence and to weigh it all up thoughtfully. In the [[Buddha]]’s [[India]] as in many other cultures, a pair of scales (''[[tulā]]'') was used as a [[symbol]] of fair and impartial {{Wiki|deliberation}} (Dhp.268). When making [[judgements]] on any matter it is easy to be swayed one way or the other by our [[desires]], by what we wished were true. [[Confidence]] tricksters are often able to cheat [[people]] because they stimulate their [[greed]], [[knowing]] that [[greed]] clouds [[judgement]]. The [[wise]] [[person]] tries to keep personal [[feelings]] at bay when making [[judgements]] and remains ‘watchful of the [[truth]]’ (''[[dhammassa gutto]]'') i.e. of the facts. | The first thing the [[Buddha]] recommended here is not to make [[judgements]] hastily or impulsively ([[asāhana]]). Most things, [[people]] included, are multifaceted and take [[time]] to reveal themselves to us fully. Likewise, [[knowledge]] about something usually comes at the end of a process of accumulating {{Wiki|data}}. Consequently, it is safe to say that any [[judgement]] made in haste is likely to be wrong, or at least partial. If things are multifaceted it follows that they may well appear different according to the perspective they are observed from and thus the [[Buddha]] advised us to ‘look at both sides of the matter’ (''[[atthaṃ anatthañ ca ubho niccheyya]]''). Getting the opinion of the different parties in a dispute, taking into account a person’s good points and not just their failings, considering that the [[person]] who was rude to us might have had a bad day and that he is not usually like that, would all be examples of this. The qualities of fairness (''[[dhammena]]'') and impartiality ('''[[sāma]]''') are not always easy to define but an important [[element]] of both is equality of treatment. It is always prudent not to overemphasize some facts more than others, to take into account all the evidence and to weigh it all up thoughtfully. In the [[Buddha]]’s [[India]] as in many other cultures, a pair of scales (''[[tulā]]'') was used as a [[symbol]] of fair and impartial {{Wiki|deliberation}} (Dhp.268). When making [[judgements]] on any matter it is easy to be swayed one way or the other by our [[desires]], by what we wished were true. [[Confidence]] tricksters are often able to cheat [[people]] because they stimulate their [[greed]], [[knowing]] that [[greed]] clouds [[judgement]]. The [[wise]] [[person]] tries to keep personal [[feelings]] at bay when making [[judgements]] and remains ‘watchful of the [[truth]]’ (''[[dhammassa gutto]]'') i.e. of the facts. | ||
| − | Perhaps we could add one last thing to the [[Buddha’s]] [[wise]] advice, a point highlighted in the [[Pāyāsi Sutta]] (D.II,347-8). Having made a [[judgement]] to the best of our ability, it is always good to continue to keep an open [[mind]]. This way, if later [[experience]] or additional facts show that our initial [[judgement]] was wrong, we will be able to adjust it. A prejudice is an opinion that is not amenable to | + | Perhaps we could add one last thing to the [[Buddha’s]] [[wise]] advice, a point highlighted in the [[Pāyāsi Sutta]] (D.II,347-8). Having made a [[judgement]] to the best of our ability, it is always good to continue to keep an open [[mind]]. This way, if later [[experience]] or additional facts show that our initial [[judgement]] was wrong, we will be able to adjust it. A prejudice is an opinion that is not amenable to change and prejudices are the [[cause]] of a great many {{Wiki|interpersonal}} and {{Wiki|social}} problems. |
Latest revision as of 17:34, 30 September 2013
To make a judgement (pamāṇa or vinicchaya) is to draw a conclusion or make a decision about something. According to the Buddha, people make judgements in one of four ways – (1) according to outward appearance (rūpappamāṇa), (2) according to the opinion of others (ghosappamāṇa), (3) according to economic status (lūkhappamāṇa) or (4) according to reality (dhammappamāṇa, A.II,71).
We usually make judgements within two contexts – when called upon to arbitrate between two or more parties, or on first meeting a person or seeing them behave in a certain manner. In this first context, we will make our judgement known to the parties involved and hopeful it will soothe any disagreement between them.
Making judgements about the people we come into contact with is usually done within the privacy of our own minds. However, it will influence how we think about them – whether with respect or contempt, trust or suspicion, like, dislike or indifference. And, of course, the opinion we form about them from our judgements will in turn influence how we treat them. This being the case, we should be careful in making judgements about others, particularly critical ones.
Perhaps it would be appropriate to also mention a type of judging which mainly concerns Buddhists. There is a certain type of Buddhist who takes considerable interest in pontificating about what type of kamma a person must have done to be reborn in their present circumstances, or about where they will be reborn as a result of how they are acting now. Such speculating can only ever be at best a poor guess. The Buddha said that trying to work out the subtle and interconnected workings of kamma would be enough to drive an ordinary person mad (A.II,80). This is not because the functioning of kamma is ambiguous, but because we can never really know what is going on in other peoples’ minds, their motives or even the full range of their actions. When the Buddha heard that the lay disciple Migasāla was confidently claiming that several people who had recently died were reborn in certain circumstances, he said: ‘Who is this Migasāla ... to know the complexity of the human character?’ Then he added: ‘Do not be a judge of others, do not judge others. Whoever judges others digs a pit for themselves.’ (A.III,351).
Apart from the distinct possibility that the judgements we make about people may be wrong, judging others may also be a symptom of, or give rise to, smugness and self-righteousness. It may even be a way of deflecting attention from our own moral weaknesses and failings. Nonetheless, there are many situations in life where we are required to make judgments about people – whether a babysitter is competent to look after our child, whether the person who asks to borrow money from us genuinely intends to return it, whether the mechanic who says he can repair our car really can. What can we do to ensure that our judgements reflect reality so that we can make more intelligent choices? The Buddha offered this sound and sensible advice: ‘To make a quick judgement does not make one right. The wise person looks at both sides of the matter, with fairness, impartiality, watchful of the truth, wisely and without haste. Such a person is called righteous.’ (Dhp.256-7).
The first thing the Buddha recommended here is not to make judgements hastily or impulsively (asāhana). Most things, people included, are multifaceted and take time to reveal themselves to us fully. Likewise, knowledge about something usually comes at the end of a process of accumulating data. Consequently, it is safe to say that any judgement made in haste is likely to be wrong, or at least partial. If things are multifaceted it follows that they may well appear different according to the perspective they are observed from and thus the Buddha advised us to ‘look at both sides of the matter’ (atthaṃ anatthañ ca ubho niccheyya). Getting the opinion of the different parties in a dispute, taking into account a person’s good points and not just their failings, considering that the person who was rude to us might have had a bad day and that he is not usually like that, would all be examples of this. The qualities of fairness (dhammena) and impartiality (sāma) are not always easy to define but an important element of both is equality of treatment. It is always prudent not to overemphasize some facts more than others, to take into account all the evidence and to weigh it all up thoughtfully. In the Buddha’s India as in many other cultures, a pair of scales (tulā) was used as a symbol of fair and impartial deliberation (Dhp.268). When making judgements on any matter it is easy to be swayed one way or the other by our desires, by what we wished were true. Confidence tricksters are often able to cheat people because they stimulate their greed, knowing that greed clouds judgement. The wise person tries to keep personal feelings at bay when making judgements and remains ‘watchful of the truth’ (dhammassa gutto) i.e. of the facts.
Perhaps we could add one last thing to the Buddha’s wise advice, a point highlighted in the Pāyāsi Sutta (D.II,347-8). Having made a judgement to the best of our ability, it is always good to continue to keep an open mind. This way, if later experience or additional facts show that our initial judgement was wrong, we will be able to adjust it. A prejudice is an opinion that is not amenable to change and prejudices are the cause of a great many interpersonal and social problems.
