Difference between revisions of "Self-nature"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
By [[Barbara O'Brien]] | By [[Barbara O'Brien]] | ||
− | Among all the [[Buddha]]'s teachings, those on the nature of the [[self]] are the hardest to understand, yet they are central to the [[religion]]. In fact, "fully perceiving the nature of the [[self]]" is one way to define [[enlightenment]]. | + | Among all the [[Buddha]]'s teachings, those on the [[nature]] of the [[self]] are the hardest to understand, yet they are central to the [[religion]]. In fact, "fully perceiving the [[nature]] of the [[self]]" is one way to define [[enlightenment]]. |
The [[Five Skandhas]] | The [[Five Skandhas]] | ||
− | The [[Buddha]] taught that an {{Wiki|individual}} is a combination of [[five aggregates]] of [[existence]], also called the [[Five Skandhas]] or the [[five heaps]]. These are: | + | The [[Buddha]] [[taught]] that an {{Wiki|individual}} is a combination of [[five aggregates]] of [[existence]], also called the [[Five Skandhas]] or the [[five heaps]]. These are: |
[[Form]] | [[Form]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Consciousness]] | [[Consciousness]] | ||
[[File:4b50c343a z.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:4b50c343a z.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | Various schools of [[Buddhism]] interpret the [[skandhas]] in somewhat different ways. Generally, the first [[skandha]] is our [[physical]] [[form]]. The second is made up of our [[feelings]], [[emotional]] and [[physical]], and our [[senses]] -- [[seeing]], [[hearing]], tasting, touching, smelling. | + | Various schools of [[Buddhism]] interpret the [[skandhas]] in somewhat different ways. Generally, the first [[skandha]] is our [[physical]] [[form]]. The second is made up of our [[feelings]], [[emotional]] and [[physical]], and our [[senses]] -- [[seeing]], [[hearing]], [[tasting]], [[touching]], [[smelling]]. |
− | The third [[skandha]], [[perception]], takes in most of what we call [[thinking]] -- [[conceptualization]], {{Wiki|cognition}}, {{Wiki|reasoning}}. This also includes the [[recognition]] that occurs when an organ comes into [[contact]] with an [[object]]. [[Perception]] can be [[thought]] of as "that which identifies." The [[object]] [[perceived]] may be a [[physical]] [[object]] or a [[mental]] one, such as an [[idea]]. | + | The third [[skandha]], [[perception]], takes in most of what we call [[thinking]] -- [[conceptualization]], {{Wiki|cognition}}, {{Wiki|reasoning}}. This also includes the [[recognition]] that occurs when an {{Wiki|organ}} comes into [[contact]] with an [[object]]. [[Perception]] can be [[thought]] of as "that which identifies." The [[object]] [[perceived]] may be a [[physical]] [[object]] or a [[mental]] one, such as an [[idea]]. |
[[File:282452662 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:282452662 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | The [[fourth skandha]], [[mental formations]], includes [[habits]], prejudices and predispositions. Our [[Wikipedia:Volition (psychology)|volition]], or willfulness, also is part of the [[fourth skandha]], as are [[attention]], [[faith]], [[conscientiousness]], | + | The [[fourth skandha]], [[mental formations]], includes [[habits]], prejudices and predispositions. Our [[Wikipedia:Volition (psychology)|volition]], or willfulness, also is part of the [[fourth skandha]], as are [[attention]], [[faith]], [[conscientiousness]], {{Wiki|pride}}, [[desire]], vindictiveness, and many other [[mental states]] both [[virtuous]] and not [[virtuous]]. The [[causes]] and effects of [[karma]] are especially important to the [[fourth skandha]]. |
The fifth [[skandha]], [[consciousness]], is [[awareness]] of or sensitivity to an [[object]], but without [[conceptualization]]. Once there is [[awareness]], the third [[skandha]] might [[recognize]] the [[object]] and assign a {{Wiki|concept}}-value to it, and the [[fourth skandha]] might react with [[desire]] or revulsion or some other [[mental formation]]. The fifth [[skandha]] is explained in some schools as base that ties the [[experience]] of [[life]] together. | The fifth [[skandha]], [[consciousness]], is [[awareness]] of or sensitivity to an [[object]], but without [[conceptualization]]. Once there is [[awareness]], the third [[skandha]] might [[recognize]] the [[object]] and assign a {{Wiki|concept}}-value to it, and the [[fourth skandha]] might react with [[desire]] or revulsion or some other [[mental formation]]. The fifth [[skandha]] is explained in some schools as base that ties the [[experience]] of [[life]] together. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
What's most important to understand about the [[skandhas]] is that they are [[empty]]. They are not qualities that an {{Wiki|individual}} possesses, because there is [[no-self]] possessing them. This [[doctrine]] of [[no-self]] is called [[anatman]] or [[anatta]]. | What's most important to understand about the [[skandhas]] is that they are [[empty]]. They are not qualities that an {{Wiki|individual}} possesses, because there is [[no-self]] possessing them. This [[doctrine]] of [[no-self]] is called [[anatman]] or [[anatta]]. | ||
− | Very basically, the [[Buddha]] taught that "you" are not an integral, autonomous entity. The {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], or what we might call the [[ego]], is more correctly [[thought]] of as a by-product of the [[skandhas]]. | + | Very basically, the [[Buddha]] [[taught]] that "you" are not an integral, autonomous [[entity]]. The {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], or what we might call the [[ego]], is more correctly [[thought]] of as a by-product of the [[skandhas]]. |
− | On the surface, this appears to be a {{Wiki|nihilistic}} [[teaching]]. But the [[Buddha]] taught that if we can see through the [[delusion]] of the small, {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], we [[experience]] that which is not [[subject]] to [[birth]] and [[death]]. | + | On the surface, this appears to be a {{Wiki|nihilistic}} [[teaching]]. But the [[Buddha]] [[taught]] that if we can see through the [[delusion]] of the small, {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], we [[experience]] that which is not [[subject]] to [[birth]] and [[death]]. |
Two [[Views]] | Two [[Views]] | ||
− | Beyond this point, [[Theravada Buddhism]] and [[Mahayana Buddhism]] differ on how [[anatman]] is understood. In fact, more than anything else it is the different understanding of [[self]] that defines and separates the two schools. | + | Beyond this point, [[Theravada Buddhism]] and [[Mahayana Buddhism]] differ on how [[anatman]] is understood. In fact, more than anything else it is the different [[understanding]] of [[self]] that defines and separates the two schools. |
Very basically, [[Theravada]] considers [[anatman]] to mean that an {{Wiki|individual}}'s [[ego]] or [[personality]] is a [[fetter]] and [[delusion]]. Once freed of this [[delusion]], the {{Wiki|individual}} may enjoy the [[bliss]] of [[Nirvana]]. | Very basically, [[Theravada]] considers [[anatman]] to mean that an {{Wiki|individual}}'s [[ego]] or [[personality]] is a [[fetter]] and [[delusion]]. Once freed of this [[delusion]], the {{Wiki|individual}} may enjoy the [[bliss]] of [[Nirvana]]. |
Latest revision as of 10:26, 14 October 2014
By Barbara O'Brien
Among all the Buddha's teachings, those on the nature of the self are the hardest to understand, yet they are central to the religion. In fact, "fully perceiving the nature of the self" is one way to define enlightenment.
The Five Skandhas
The Buddha taught that an individual is a combination of five aggregates of existence, also called the Five Skandhas or the five heaps. These are:
Form
Sensation
Perception
Mental formations
Consciousness
Various schools of Buddhism interpret the skandhas in somewhat different ways. Generally, the first skandha is our physical form. The second is made up of our feelings, emotional and physical, and our senses -- seeing, hearing, tasting, touching, smelling.
The third skandha, perception, takes in most of what we call thinking -- conceptualization, cognition, reasoning. This also includes the recognition that occurs when an organ comes into contact with an object. Perception can be thought of as "that which identifies." The object perceived may be a physical object or a mental one, such as an idea.
The fourth skandha, mental formations, includes habits, prejudices and predispositions. Our volition, or willfulness, also is part of the fourth skandha, as are attention, faith, conscientiousness, pride, desire, vindictiveness, and many other mental states both virtuous and not virtuous. The causes and effects of karma are especially important to the fourth skandha.
The fifth skandha, consciousness, is awareness of or sensitivity to an object, but without conceptualization. Once there is awareness, the third skandha might recognize the object and assign a concept-value to it, and the fourth skandha might react with desire or revulsion or some other mental formation. The fifth skandha is explained in some schools as base that ties the experience of life together.
The Self Is No-Self
What's most important to understand about the skandhas is that they are empty. They are not qualities that an individual possesses, because there is no-self possessing them. This doctrine of no-self is called anatman or anatta.
Very basically, the Buddha taught that "you" are not an integral, autonomous entity. The individual self, or what we might call the ego, is more correctly thought of as a by-product of the skandhas.
On the surface, this appears to be a nihilistic teaching. But the Buddha taught that if we can see through the delusion of the small, individual self, we experience that which is not subject to birth and death.
Two Views
Beyond this point, Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism differ on how anatman is understood. In fact, more than anything else it is the different understanding of self that defines and separates the two schools.
Very basically, Theravada considers anatman to mean that an individual's ego or personality is a fetter and delusion. Once freed of this delusion, the individual may enjoy the bliss of Nirvana.
Mahayana, on the other hand, considers all physical forms to be void of intrinsic self (a teaching called shunyata, which means "emptiness"). The ideal in Mahayana is to enable all beings to be enlightened together, not only out of a sense of compassion, but because we are not really separate, autonomous beings.