Difference between revisions of "Mysticism"
m (Text replacement - "The Buddha" to "The Buddha") |
m (1 revision: Robo replace 16sept) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Looked at from the perspective of modern psychology, we could say that most, if not all, experiences usually labeled [[Mystical]] have these four characteristics. (1) It has an intense emotional component, (2) it is triggered by physical or psychological stress – despair, longing, [[Fasting]], suppressed sexuality, long vigils, etc, (3) it never contradicts the mystic’s theological beliefs – Christians do not have visions of Viṣṇu, Muslims never have a glimpse of the Trinity, etc, and (4) it is interpreted as having been caused by an external agent – [[God]], angels, etc. The [[Buddha]]’s description of his [[Enlightenment]] does not fit well into either James’ or Underhill’s definitions of the [[Mystical]] state nor does it have any of the other four characteristics of mysticism. | Looked at from the perspective of modern psychology, we could say that most, if not all, experiences usually labeled [[Mystical]] have these four characteristics. (1) It has an intense emotional component, (2) it is triggered by physical or psychological stress – despair, longing, [[Fasting]], suppressed sexuality, long vigils, etc, (3) it never contradicts the mystic’s theological beliefs – Christians do not have visions of Viṣṇu, Muslims never have a glimpse of the Trinity, etc, and (4) it is interpreted as having been caused by an external agent – [[God]], angels, etc. The [[Buddha]]’s description of his [[Enlightenment]] does not fit well into either James’ or Underhill’s definitions of the [[Mystical]] state nor does it have any of the other four characteristics of mysticism. | ||
| − | The [[Buddha]] appears to have been exceptionally calm and poised, emotionless even, as he began his [[Meditation]] in the hours before his [[Enlightenment]] (M.I,167). The intense [[Joy]] (vimuttisukha) he felt only came later (Ud.1-3). He had fully recovered from his austerities at the time he attained [[Enlightenment]]. He mentioned that he had eaten proper [[Food]], rested and regained his strength ([[Bala]]ṃ gahetvā, M.I,247). There is no evidence that he had any idea about [[ | + | The [[Buddha]] appears to have been exceptionally calm and poised, emotionless even, as he began his [[Meditation]] in the hours before his [[Enlightenment]] (M.I,167). The intense [[Joy]] (vimuttisukha) he felt only came later (Ud.1-3). He had fully recovered from his austerities at the time he attained [[Enlightenment]]. He mentioned that he had eaten proper [[Food]], rested and regained his strength ([[Bala]]ṃ gahetvā, M.I,247). There is no evidence that he had any idea about The [[Four Noble Truths]] or [[Dependent origination]] before his [[Enlightenment]]. In fact, he distinctly said that the truths he realized had ‘not been heard about before’ (pubbe ananussutesu, SV,422). The [[Buddha]] never described his [[Enlightenment]] as a gift from [[God]] or as the result of divine grace. He always taught that a person attains [[Enlightenment]] ‘through his own [[Knowledge]] and vision’ (sayaṃ abhiññā, D.III,55). |
Some writers on [[Religion]] occasionally refer to what they call ‘Buddhist mysticism.’ Interestingly, the word mysticism comes from the Latin mysterium meaning ‘to close the [[Eyes]]’ while the Pāḷi word for [[Enlightenment]] ([[Bodhi]]) means ‘to awaken’ or ‘to open the [[Eyes]].’ | Some writers on [[Religion]] occasionally refer to what they call ‘Buddhist mysticism.’ Interestingly, the word mysticism comes from the Latin mysterium meaning ‘to close the [[Eyes]]’ while the Pāḷi word for [[Enlightenment]] ([[Bodhi]]) means ‘to awaken’ or ‘to open the [[Eyes]].’ | ||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 16 September 2013
Mysticism is a term given to a variety of intense experiences or the means of developing such experiences. Mysticism is notoriously difficult to define. William James said that the main features of the Mystical experience are ineffability, noetic quality, transience and passivity. Evelyn Underhill wrote that mysticism could be described as being practical rather than theoretical, an entirely Spiritual activity, having Love as its purpose and method, and as never being self-seeking. The problem with these and indeed most definitions of mysticism is that they apply mainly to the major monotheistic religions and do not take into account Buddhism, Jainism, Taoism and non-religious Mystical experience.
Looked at from the perspective of modern psychology, we could say that most, if not all, experiences usually labeled Mystical have these four characteristics. (1) It has an intense emotional component, (2) it is triggered by physical or psychological stress – despair, longing, Fasting, suppressed sexuality, long vigils, etc, (3) it never contradicts the mystic’s theological beliefs – Christians do not have visions of Viṣṇu, Muslims never have a glimpse of the Trinity, etc, and (4) it is interpreted as having been caused by an external agent – God, angels, etc. The Buddha’s description of his Enlightenment does not fit well into either James’ or Underhill’s definitions of the Mystical state nor does it have any of the other four characteristics of mysticism.
The Buddha appears to have been exceptionally calm and poised, emotionless even, as he began his Meditation in the hours before his Enlightenment (M.I,167). The intense Joy (vimuttisukha) he felt only came later (Ud.1-3). He had fully recovered from his austerities at the time he attained Enlightenment. He mentioned that he had eaten proper Food, rested and regained his strength (Balaṃ gahetvā, M.I,247). There is no evidence that he had any idea about The Four Noble Truths or Dependent origination before his Enlightenment. In fact, he distinctly said that the truths he realized had ‘not been heard about before’ (pubbe ananussutesu, SV,422). The Buddha never described his Enlightenment as a gift from God or as the result of divine grace. He always taught that a person attains Enlightenment ‘through his own Knowledge and vision’ (sayaṃ abhiññā, D.III,55).
Some writers on Religion occasionally refer to what they call ‘Buddhist mysticism.’ Interestingly, the word mysticism comes from the Latin mysterium meaning ‘to close the Eyes’ while the Pāḷi word for Enlightenment (Bodhi) means ‘to awaken’ or ‘to open the Eyes.’
