Difference between revisions of "Cognition"
m (1 revision: Adminos 7 october) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:For ning.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:For ning.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{{WIKISeealso|Cognition}} | {{WIKISeealso|Cognition}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
| − | 1.the act or process of knowing; [[perception]]. | + | 1.the act or process of [[knowing]]; [[perception]]. |
2.the product of such a process; something thus known, [[perceived]], etc. | 2.the product of such a process; something thus known, [[perceived]], etc. | ||
3.[[knowledge]]. | 3.[[knowledge]]. | ||
| − | 1.the [[mental]] act or process by which [[knowledge]] is acquired, including [[perception]], intuition, and reasoning | + | 1.the [[mental]] act or process by which [[knowledge]] is acquired, [[including]] [[perception]], {{Wiki|intuition}}, and {{Wiki|reasoning}} |
2.the [[knowledge]] that results from such an act or process | 2.the [[knowledge]] that results from such an act or process | ||
| + | |||
| + | In it's utimate aspect [[cognition]] is [[limitless]] due to it's being {{Wiki|synonymous}} with [[pure awareness]], nonconceived and without particulars of [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] or, [[discursive thinking]]. As such, this [[unlimited]] aspect as [[cognition]] is still not changed as a result of [[discursive thought]], | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[conceptuality]] or its particulars, suffering/not-suffering, [[samsara and nirvana]] notwithstanding as is [[recognized]] by their actual {{Wiki|inseparability}} ([[dbyer med]]). This [[pure]] cognizance, then, comes to be termed re-cognition as it becomes reflective of it's [[own]] [[innate purity]], and re-cognizes - | ||
| + | |||
| + | of it's [[own]] [[inherent]] potentiality as particulars, or - all things. Nonetheless, all things...each and every single 'thing' whatsoever...are as spontaneous and nameless within and as themselves as they are even in their {{Wiki|recognition}} as particulars, each with an [[infinite]] array of [[attributes]] or aspects which come to be defined as a direct result of such re-cognition and reflections | ||
| + | |||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/++cognition?s=t dictionary.reference.com] | [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/++cognition?s=t dictionary.reference.com] | ||
[[Category:Buddhist Terms]] | [[Category:Buddhist Terms]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:54, 10 March 2024
- See Also in Wikipedia :
1.the act or process of knowing; perception.
2.the product of such a process; something thus known, perceived, etc.
3.knowledge.
1.the mental act or process by which knowledge is acquired, including perception, intuition, and reasoning
2.the knowledge that results from such an act or process
In it's utimate aspect cognition is limitless due to it's being synonymous with pure awareness, nonconceived and without particulars of concepts or, discursive thinking. As such, this unlimited aspect as cognition is still not changed as a result of discursive thought,
conceptuality or its particulars, suffering/not-suffering, samsara and nirvana notwithstanding as is recognized by their actual inseparability (dbyer med). This pure cognizance, then, comes to be termed re-cognition as it becomes reflective of it's own innate purity, and re-cognizes -
of it's own inherent potentiality as particulars, or - all things. Nonetheless, all things...each and every single 'thing' whatsoever...are as spontaneous and nameless within and as themselves as they are even in their recognition as particulars, each with an infinite array of attributes or aspects which come to be defined as a direct result of such re-cognition and reflections
