Difference between revisions of "Three modes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|250px| The '''three modes''' (Skt. ''trairūpya''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|ཚུལ་གསུམ་}}; Wyl. ''tshul gsum'') of a ...") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{RigpaWiki}} | {{RigpaWiki}} | ||
[[Category:Pramāṇa]] | [[Category:Pramāṇa]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Buddhist Logic]] | + | [[Category:Buddhist Logic]]{{BuddhismbyNumber}} |
Revision as of 10:21, 22 April 2014
The three modes (Skt. trairūpya; Tib. ཚུལ་གསུམ་; Wyl. tshul gsum) of a logical argument are as follows:
- the reason must be a feature of the subject (pakṣadharma; ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་, phyogs chos)
- there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (anvayavyāpti; རྗེས་ཁྱབ་, rjes khyab)
- there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (vyatirekavyāpti; ལྡོག་ཁྱབ་, ldog khyab)
Alternative Translations
- Threefold criteria
