Difference between revisions of "Daoxuan's division of edifying and practical teachings"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{DisplayImages|3813|3422}} {{Centre|<big><big>Daoxuan's division of edifying and practical teachings</big></big><br/> By Indrajala (Jeffrey Kotyk)}}<br/><br/> [[Daoxuan]...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{DisplayImages | + | {{DisplayImages|3422}} |
{{Centre|<big><big>Daoxuan's division of edifying and practical teachings</big></big><br/> | {{Centre|<big><big>Daoxuan's division of edifying and practical teachings</big></big><br/> | ||
By [[Indrajala (Jeffrey Kotyk)]]}}<br/><br/> | By [[Indrajala (Jeffrey Kotyk)]]}}<br/><br/> | ||
| − | [[Daoxuan]] [[道宣]] (596-667) is hailed as a great vinaya master of the {{Wiki|Tang Dynasty}}. He wrote an extensive commentary on the vinaya that consolidated various interpretations as well as accommodating Śrāvaka precepts in an entirely Bodhisattva-based system of ethics. He made a distinction between edifying teachings and practical teachings. The former concern the internal mind, the later two concern body and speech or external activities. He was quite firm in his teaching that discipline is indeed the foundation of Buddhist practise. | + | [[Daoxuan]] [[道宣]] (596-667) is hailed as a great [[vinaya master]] of the {{Wiki|Tang Dynasty}}. He wrote an extensive commentary on the [[vinaya]] that consolidated various interpretations as well as accommodating [[Śrāvaka]] [[precepts]] in an entirely Bodhisattva-based system of [[ethics]]. He made a {{Wiki|distinction}} between edifying teachings and {{Wiki|practical}} teachings. The former [[concern]] the internal [[mind]], the later two [[concern]] [[body]] and {{Wiki|speech}} or external [[activities]]. He was quite firm in his [[teaching]] that [[discipline]] is indeed the foundation of [[Buddhist]] practise. |
: 謂內心違順、託理為宗、則準化教。外用施為、必護身口、便依行教。然犯化教者、但受業道一報。違行教者、重增聖制之罪。 | : 謂內心違順、託理為宗、則準化教。外用施為、必護身口、便依行教。然犯化教者、但受業道一報。違行教者、重增聖制之罪。 | ||
| − | : It said that internally the mind has adversity and favourable circumstances -- relying on the princple as the model one then learns the edifying teaching. Externally actions are undertaken – one must guard the body and speech and so then one depends on the practical teaching. Thus, one who violates the edifying teachings only receives a single retribution on the path of karma. The one who violates the practical teachings doubly increases the crime of [violating] the sacred discipline. | + | : It said that internally the [[mind]] has adversity and [[favourable]] circumstances -- relying on the princple as the model one then learns the edifying [[teaching]]. Externally [[actions]] are undertaken – one must guard the [[body]] and {{Wiki|speech}} and so then one depends on the {{Wiki|practical}} [[teaching]]. Thus, one who violates the edifying teachings only receives a single retribution on the [[path]] of [[karma]]. The one who violates the {{Wiki|practical}} teachings doubly increases the [[crime]] of [violating] the [[sacred]] [[discipline]]. |
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:12, 16 July 2014
Daoxuan's division of edifying and practical teachings
By Indrajala (Jeffrey Kotyk)
Daoxuan 道宣 (596-667) is hailed as a great vinaya master of the Tang Dynasty. He wrote an extensive commentary on the vinaya that consolidated various interpretations as well as accommodating Śrāvaka precepts in an entirely Bodhisattva-based system of ethics. He made a distinction between edifying teachings and practical teachings. The former concern the internal mind, the later two concern body and speech or external activities. He was quite firm in his teaching that discipline is indeed the foundation of Buddhist practise.
- 謂內心違順、託理為宗、則準化教。外用施為、必護身口、便依行教。然犯化教者、但受業道一報。違行教者、重增聖制之罪。
- It said that internally the mind has adversity and favourable circumstances -- relying on the princple as the model one then learns the edifying teaching. Externally actions are undertaken – one must guard the body and speech and so then one depends on the practical teaching. Thus, one who violates the edifying teachings only receives a single retribution on the path of karma. The one who violates the practical teachings doubly increases the crime of [violating] the sacred discipline.
