Difference between revisions of "Cetanaa Sutta"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Maurice O'Connell Walshe}}<br/><br/> | Maurice O'Connell Walshe}}<br/><br/> | ||
| − | [1] [At Saavatthii the [[Blessed One]] said:] "[[Monks]], what a man wills, what he plans, what he dwells on [[forms]] the basis for the continuation of [[consciousness]].[2] This basis being {{Wiki|present}}, [[consciousness]] has a lodgment. [[Consciousness]] being lodged there and growing, [[rebirth]] of renewed [[existence]] takes place in the {{Wiki|future}}, and from this renewed [[existence]] arise [[birth]], decay-and-death, [[grief]], [[lamentation]], [[suffering]], [[sorrow]] and {{Wiki|despair}}. Such is the uprising of this entire mass of [[suffering]]. | + | [1] [At Saavatthii the [[Blessed One]] said:] "[[Monks]], what a man wills, what he plans, what he dwells on [[forms]] the basis for the continuation of [[consciousness]].[2] This basis being {{Wiki|present}}, [[consciousness]] has a lodgment. [[Consciousness]] being lodged there and growing, [[rebirth]] of renewed [[existence]] takes place in the {{Wiki|future}}, and from this renewed [[existence]] arise [[birth]], decay-and-death, [[grief]], [[lamentation]], [[suffering]], [[sorrow]] and {{Wiki|despair}}. Such is the uprising of this entire {{Wiki|mass}} of [[suffering]]. |
"Even if a man does not will and plan, yet if he dwells on something this [[forms]] a basis for the continuation of [[consciousness]]:... [[rebirth]]... takes place... | "Even if a man does not will and plan, yet if he dwells on something this [[forms]] a basis for the continuation of [[consciousness]]:... [[rebirth]]... takes place... | ||
| − | "But if a man neither wills nor plans nor dwells on anything, no basis is formed for the continuation of [[consciousness]]. This basis being absent, [[consciousness]] has no lodgment. [[Consciousness]] not being lodged there and not growing, no [[rebirth]] of renewed [[existence]] takes place in the {{Wiki|future}}, and so [[birth]], decay-and-death, [[grief]], [[lamentation]], [[suffering]], [[sorrow]] and {{Wiki|despair}} are destroyed. Such is the [[cessation]] of this entire mass of [[suffering]]." | + | "But if a man neither wills nor plans nor dwells on anything, no basis is formed for the continuation of [[consciousness]]. This basis being absent, [[consciousness]] has no lodgment. [[Consciousness]] not being lodged there and not growing, no [[rebirth]] of renewed [[existence]] takes place in the {{Wiki|future}}, and so [[birth]], decay-and-death, [[grief]], [[lamentation]], [[suffering]], [[sorrow]] and {{Wiki|despair}} are destroyed. Such is the [[cessation]] of this entire {{Wiki|mass}} of [[suffering]]." |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Latest revision as of 07:12, 9 March 2015
Volition
translated from the Pali by
Maurice O'Connell Walshe
[1] [At Saavatthii the Blessed One said:] "Monks, what a man wills, what he plans, what he dwells on forms the basis for the continuation of consciousness.[2] This basis being present, consciousness has a lodgment. Consciousness being lodged there and growing, rebirth of renewed existence takes place in the future, and from this renewed existence arise birth, decay-and-death, grief, lamentation, suffering, sorrow and despair. Such is the uprising of this entire mass of suffering.
"Even if a man does not will and plan, yet if he dwells on something this forms a basis for the continuation of consciousness:... rebirth... takes place...
"But if a man neither wills nor plans nor dwells on anything, no basis is formed for the continuation of consciousness. This basis being absent, consciousness has no lodgment. Consciousness not being lodged there and not growing, no rebirth of renewed existence takes place in the future, and so birth, decay-and-death, grief, lamentation, suffering, sorrow and despair are destroyed. Such is the cessation of this entire mass of suffering."
Notes
1. Cetanaa. This is equated in AN vi, 13 with kamma. [Cf. AN 6.63, sect. [5]: "... Intention, I tell you, is kamma."]
2. Consciousness (defined as "karmic consciousness" in SA [SN Commentary]) is dependent on the formations (sankhaaraa) of which volition (n. 1) is one.
