Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Kenshō"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "mediated" to "mediated")
Line 110: Line 110:
  
  
The notion of "[[experience]]" fits in a popular set of dichotomies: [[pure]] (unmediated) versus [[mediated]], noncognitive versus [[cognitive]], experiential versus [[intellectual]], intuitive versus [[intellectual]], nonrational versus [[rational]], nondiscursive versus discursive, nonpropositional versus propositional.
+
The notion of "[[experience]]" fits in a popular set of dichotomies: [[pure]] (unmediated) versus mediated, noncognitive versus [[cognitive]], experiential versus [[intellectual]], intuitive versus [[intellectual]], nonrational versus [[rational]], nondiscursive versus discursive, nonpropositional versus propositional.
  
  
Line 119: Line 119:
  
  
The notion of "[[experience]]" has been criticized. [[Robert Sharf]] points out that "[[experience]]" is a typical {{Wiki|western}} term, which has found it's way into {{Wiki|Asian}} religiosity via {{Wiki|western}} [[influences]]. The notion of "[[experience]]" introduces a false notion of [[duality]] between "[[experiencer]]" and "[[experienced]]", where-as the [[essence]] of [[kensho]] is the {{Wiki|realisation}} of the "[[non-duality]]" of observer and observed. "[[Pure experience]]" does not [[exist]]; all [[experience]] is [[mediated]] by [[intellectual]] and [[cognitive]] [[activity]]. The specific teachings and practices of a specific [[tradition]] may even determine what "[[experience]]" someone has, which means that this "[[experience]]" is not the [[proof]] of the [[teaching]], but a result of the [[teaching]].  
+
The notion of "[[experience]]" has been criticized. [[Robert Sharf]] points out that "[[experience]]" is a typical {{Wiki|western}} term, which has found it's way into {{Wiki|Asian}} religiosity via {{Wiki|western}} [[influences]]. The notion of "[[experience]]" introduces a false notion of [[duality]] between "[[experiencer]]" and "[[experienced]]", where-as the [[essence]] of [[kensho]] is the {{Wiki|realisation}} of the "[[non-duality]]" of observer and observed. "[[Pure experience]]" does not [[exist]]; all [[experience]] is mediated by [[intellectual]] and [[cognitive]] [[activity]]. The specific teachings and practices of a specific [[tradition]] may even determine what "[[experience]]" someone has, which means that this "[[experience]]" is not the [[proof]] of the [[teaching]], but a result of the [[teaching]].  
  
 
A [[pure consciousness]] without [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]], reached by "cleaning the doors of [[perception]]", would be an overwhelming {{Wiki|chaos}} of sensory input without coherence. The notion of "[[experience]]" also over-emphasises [[kensho]], as if it were the single goal of [[Zen]]-{{Wiki|training}}, where-as the [[Zen-tradition]] clearly states that "the stink of [[Zen]]" has to be removed and the "[[experience]]" of [[kensho]] has to be integrated into daily [[life]]. In the [[Rinzai-school]] this post-[[satori]] {{Wiki|training}} includes the study and mastering of great amounts of [[classical Chinese poetry]], which is far from "[[universal]]" and culture-transcending. On the contrary, it demands an [[education]] in culture-specific [[language]] and {{Wiki|behaviour}}, which is measured by specific and strict {{Wiki|cultural}} norms. Emphasising "[[experience]]" "reduces the sophisticated [[dialectic]] of [[Ch'an]]/[[Zen]] [[doctrine]] and praxis to a mere "means" or set of techniques intended to inculate such [[experiences]]".
 
A [[pure consciousness]] without [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]], reached by "cleaning the doors of [[perception]]", would be an overwhelming {{Wiki|chaos}} of sensory input without coherence. The notion of "[[experience]]" also over-emphasises [[kensho]], as if it were the single goal of [[Zen]]-{{Wiki|training}}, where-as the [[Zen-tradition]] clearly states that "the stink of [[Zen]]" has to be removed and the "[[experience]]" of [[kensho]] has to be integrated into daily [[life]]. In the [[Rinzai-school]] this post-[[satori]] {{Wiki|training}} includes the study and mastering of great amounts of [[classical Chinese poetry]], which is far from "[[universal]]" and culture-transcending. On the contrary, it demands an [[education]] in culture-specific [[language]] and {{Wiki|behaviour}}, which is measured by specific and strict {{Wiki|cultural}} norms. Emphasising "[[experience]]" "reduces the sophisticated [[dialectic]] of [[Ch'an]]/[[Zen]] [[doctrine]] and praxis to a mere "means" or set of techniques intended to inculate such [[experiences]]".

Revision as of 06:59, 9 February 2016

Ment1of1.jpg

Kenshō traditional Chinese: 見性; Japanese: 見性; literally: "see one's nature") is a Japanese term from the Zen tradition. Ken means "seeing," shō means "nature," "essence.

Kenshō is an initial insight or awakening, not full Buddhahood. It is to be followed by further training to deepen this insight, and learn to express it in daily life.

The term kenshō is often used interchangeably with satori, which is derived from the verb satoru, and means "comprehension; understanding".


Terminology

The Chinese Buddhist term jianxing (simplified Chinese: 见性; traditional Chinese: 見性; pinyin: jiànxìng; Wade–Giles: chien-hsing) compounds:


History

Buddhist monks who produced Sanskrit-Chinese translations of sutras faced many linguistic difficulties:



Thus, jianxing was the translation for dṛṣṭi-svabhāva, "view one's essential nature".

The (c. 8th century) Chinese Platform Sutra (2, Prajñā "wisdom, understanding") first records jianxing.


Pronunciations

The Modern Standard Chinese pronunciation jianxing historically derives from (c. 7th century CE) Middle Chinese kienCsjäŋC.

East Asian Languages, particularly the Sino-Xenic Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese tongues, borrowed the Chinese Buddhist term jianxing as a loanword:

Apan-earthquake.jpg


Meanings of kenshō

See also: Bodhi, Prajna, Buddha-nature, Sunyata, Suchness, Dharmakaya, and Alayavijnana

Translating kenshō into English is semantically complex.


Encyclopedic and dictionary defintions

Some encyclopedia and dictionary definitions are:



Definitions by Buddhist scholars

Buddhist scholars have defined kenshō as:

D76f.jpg


Definitions by Buddhist teachers and practitioners

Buddhist teachers and practitioners have defined kenshō as:



Further notions

The term kenshō refers to the realization of nonduality of subject and object in general, but the term kenshō may also be applied in other contexts: "How do you kenshō this?"


Kenshō is not a single experience, but refers to a whole series of realizations from a beginner's shallow glimpse of the nature of mind, up to a vision of emptiness equivalent to the 'Path of Seeing' or to Buddhahood itself. In all of these, the same 'thing' is known, but in different degrees of clarity and profundity.

"Kenshō" is commonly translated as enlightenment, a word that is also used to translate bodhi, prajna, satori and buddhahood. Western discourse tends to use these terms interchangeably, but there is a distinction between a first insight, and the further development toward Buddhahood.


Insight versus experience

See also: Buddhist modernism
Spir-1.jpg

Kensho is insight, an understanding of reality as-it-is. Contemporary understanding also describes kensho as an experience. The term "enlightenment experience" is itself a tautology: "Kensho is a kensho-experience".


The notion of "experience" fits in a popular set of dichotomies: pure (unmediated) versus mediated, noncognitive versus cognitive, experiential versus intellectual, intuitive versus intellectual, nonrational versus rational, nondiscursive versus discursive, nonpropositional versus propositional.


The notion of pure experience (junsui kuiken) to interpret and understand kensho was introduced by Nishida Kitaro in his An Inquiry into the Good (1911), under influence of "his somewhat idiosyncratic reading of western philosophy", especially William James, who wrote The Varieties of Religious Experience. Wayne Proudfoot traces the roots of the notion of "religious experience" to the German theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834), who argued that religion is based on a feeling of the infinite. The notion of "religious experience" was used by Schleiermacher to defend religion against the growing scientific and secular critique. It was adopted by many scholars of religion, of which William James was the most influential. D.T. Suzuki, who introduced Nishida Kitaro to western philosophy, took over this notion of pure experience, describing it as the essence of all religions, but best represented in the superior Japanese culture and religion.


The influence of western psychology and philosophy on Japanese Buddhism was due to the persecution of Buddhism at the beginning of the Meiji Restoration, and the subsequent efforts to construct a New Buddhism (shin bukkyo), adapted to the modern times. It was this New Buddhism which has shaped the understanding of Zen in the west, especially through the writings of D.T. Suzuki and the Sanbo Kyodan, an exponent of the Meiji-era opening of Zen-training for lay-followers.


The notion of "experience" has been criticized. Robert Sharf points out that "experience" is a typical western term, which has found it's way into Asian religiosity via western influences. The notion of "experience" introduces a false notion of duality between "experiencer" and "experienced", where-as the essence of kensho is the realisation of the "non-duality" of observer and observed. "Pure experience" does not exist; all experience is mediated by intellectual and cognitive activity. The specific teachings and practices of a specific tradition may even determine what "experience" someone has, which means that this "experience" is not the proof of the teaching, but a result of the teaching.

A pure consciousness without concepts, reached by "cleaning the doors of perception", would be an overwhelming chaos of sensory input without coherence. The notion of "experience" also over-emphasises kensho, as if it were the single goal of Zen-training, where-as the Zen-tradition clearly states that "the stink of Zen" has to be removed and the "experience" of kensho has to be integrated into daily life. In the Rinzai-school this post-satori training includes the study and mastering of great amounts of classical Chinese poetry, which is far from "universal" and culture-transcending. On the contrary, it demands an education in culture-specific language and behaviour, which is measured by specific and strict cultural norms. Emphasising "experience" "reduces the sophisticated dialectic of Ch'an/Zen doctrine and praxis to a mere "means" or set of techniques intended to inculate such experiences".


Kenshō "experiences"

Classical accounts

Ssxfitz.jpg

The classical Zen-texts, such as the Kao-seng-chuan (Biographies of Eminent Monks) and the transmission lists, called "Transmission of the Lamp"; the yü-lü genre (the recorded sayings of the masters, such as the Linji yü lü); and the various koan-collections, contain accounts of "enlightenment experiences". These accounts are not verbatim recordings of such "experiences", but well-edited texts, written down decennia or even decades after the supposed sayings and meetings.


The Denkōroku, "The Record of the Transmission of the Light", written by Keizan Jōkin 瑩山紹瑾 (1268–1325), is an example of the "Transmission of the Lamp"-genre. It contains literary accounts of the patriarchs of the Soto-lineage, from Shakyamuni Buddha to Koun Ejō, in which kensho plays a central role. They are not to be taken as literal accounts of awakening, but as stories underpinning the legitimacy of the Dogen-shu, which in its early history had seen a fierce internal conflict over the correct lineage during the Sandai sōron.


The Denkoroku gives the following account of Dogen's awakening:

Once, during late-night zazen, Rujing told the monks, "Studying Zen is the dropping off of body and mind." Hearing this, the master was suddenly greatly awakened. He went at once to the abott's room and burned incense. Rujing asked him, "Why are you burning incense?" The master answered, "Body and mind have dropped off." Rujing said, "Body and mind have dropped off, the dropped-off body and mind." The master said, "This is a temporarily ability; you must not approve me without reason." Rujing replied, "I am not approving you without reason." The master asked, "Why are you not approving me without reason?" Rujing said, "You dropped off body and mind." The master bowed. Rujing said, "You have dropped off dropping off."


Contemporary accounts

Although the Zen tradition is reluctant to speak openly about the 'experience' of kensho, personal accounts can be found in Zen-texts.

Hakuin gives this description of his first kensho, when he was 21:

At around midnight on the seventh and final night of my practice, the boom of a bell from a distant temple reached my ears: suddenly, my my body and mind dropped completely away. I rose clear of even the finest dust. Overwhelmed with joy, I hollowed out at the tops of my lungs, "Old Yen-t'ou is alive and well! [...] After that, however, I became extremely proud and arrogant".

Hakuin's kensho was not approved by Shoju Rojin, who subjected Hakuin to more koan-training. This resulted in a second kensho, where-after Hakuin left Shoju Rojin. It was only when he was 41 that he attained "his final great enlightenment":

Dharmakaya mudra.jpg
[W]hen Shoju had asked his reason for becoming a monk, his reply - that he had done it because he was afraid of falling into hell - had brought the scornful retort: "You're a self-centered rascal, aren't you!" Not until eighteen years later, upon attainment of his final great enlightenment at the age of forty-one, would Hakuin fully grasp the significance of Shoju's reproach and with it the true meaning of "post-satori" practice. Years later, when Hakuin asked his student Torei the same question, Torei's answer - "To work for the salvation of my fellow beings" - brought a laugh from Hakuin. "A much better reason than mine", he said.

Keido Fukushima, a 20th century Rinzai abbott, gives the following description:


At Nanzenji there is a small hill. I used to walk near there, look at it, and often smile at the high school students who walked by there as well. One day as I walked by, I looked at the hill and it was truly amazing. i was totally lost as if there was no 'me'. I stood gazing at the hill. Some students walked by and one of them said something like 'look at that crazy monk'. Finally I came out of it. Life was never the same for me. I was free.


Other accounts can be found throughout the Zen-literature.


Spontaneous kenshō

Kenshō may be attained without the aid of a teacher. For example Richard Clarke (1933), who studied with Philip Kapleau, states that he had a spontaneous kensho when he was 13. Dennis Genpo Merzel states he had what he described as an "awakening experience" in 1971:

It was in February of that year, and I was 26 years old. My second serious relationship was ending, and I was feeling very confined and conflicted. I needed to get some space, so I went out to the Mojave desert for a three-day camping weekend with two friends. On the Friday, I hiked up a mountain alone. I knew nothing about meditation or spiritual practice. I was just sitting there, thinking about my life and the things going on. I felt I had gotten pretty screwed up for such a young age.
I could see my VW camper, my home for the weekend, parked a few miles away, . But at the same time, I was aware that my home was back in Long Beach, California. And a natural koan came to me: Where is home? All of a sudden, I had a kind of breakthrough. I felt myself fall away, and I became one with the cosmos, one with the universe, one with all things. I knew in that moment that wherever I am, that is home; home is everywhere. I also knew who I was, beyond description, but let’s call it Big Mind.
That experience completely changed my life.
DorjeChangB.jpg

More descriptions of "spontaneous kensho" can be found throughout the Zen-literature.


Training towards kenshō

See also:Zen practice

According to Harris, working towards kensho is usually a lengthy process stretched out over years or even decades. Contrary to this, Victor Hori notes that with koan-study kensho may appear within six months.

Sōtō tends towards a gradual approach, preferring to let the experiences happen on their own. Rinzai tends toward the use of Koans as a technique to unroot the habitual workings of the mind.

During intensive zazen various hallucinations and psychological disturbances may arise. These are referred to as makyo. Distinguishing these delusions from actual kensho is the primary function of the teacher, as the student may be erroneously convinced they have realized kensho.


Rinzai

In the Rinzai school, kensho is seen as indispensable:


At some point in time we pass from imprisonment in ignorance and delusion to a true vision of Zen realization: "Our enlightenment is timeless, yet our realization of it occurs in time." According to this belief experiencing a moment of awakening in this life is of central importance.

In the Rinzai-training, the student is expected to pour oneself totally in both koan-study and daily activities 'to become one' with it. Kenshō is used to describe the first breakthrough in kōan study.


Sōtō

In the Sōtō school there are two kinds of awakening. One is the practice of shikantaza, which is the "actual enlightened activity of the Buddha". The other is the accumulation of little bits of understanding, which come together, giving way to a deeper intuitive knowledge.


The "genjo-koan", or the "koan of everyday life" which "appears naturally in daily life", is emphasized. Students are not encouraged to actively seek out kenshō experiences. In Sōtō practice kenshōs "are allowed to occur naturally, as a by-product of practice. Meditative training is seen as the unfolding of one great kenshō:

R Preiss.jpg
According to the tradition of Soto Zen, although working on a koan is one way of attaining kensho, the best way is zazen. Indeed, Dogen, the founder of Soto Zen, expounded that zazen itself is enlightenment, and as long as the adept maintains a pure state of non-thinking in Zen, he is a Buddha.


Sanbō Kyōdan

Kenshō also plays a central in the Sanbō Kyōdan, a Japanese Zen-organisation which played a decisive role in the transmission of Zen to the United States. Yasutani, the founder of the Sanbo Kyodan, was disappointed about the lack of interest in kensho in the Soto-school. Yasutani's emphasis on koan-training and the importance of kensho was transmitted to his American students:


He was especially vocal concerning the point of kenshō, seeing one's true nature. He spoke more openly about it then anyone of his times, going so far as to have a public acknowledgement of those who had experienced kensho in a post-sesshin ceremony of bowing in gratitude to the three treasures.

It is also reflected in the inclusion of a relative great amount of kensho-stories in "The three pillars of Zen", written by Philip Kapleau, a student of Yasutani.


Training after kenshō

See also:Bodhicitta and Karuṇā

Zen Buddhist training does not end with kenshō. Practice is to be continued to deepen the insight and to express it in daily life.

According to Hakuin, the main aim of "post-satori practice" (gogo no shugyo, or kojo, "going beyond") is to cultivate the "Mind of Enlightenment", "benefiting others by giving them the gift of the Dharma teaching". According to Yamada Koun, "if you cannot weep with a person who is crying, there is no kensho".


But one also has to purify oneself by ongoing practice. And "experience" has to be supplemented by intellectual understanding and study of the buddhist teachings; otherwise one remains a zen temma, a "Zen devil". Finally, these efforts are to result in a natural, effortless, down-to-earth state of being, the "ultimate liberation", "knowing without any kind of defilement".

To deepen the initial insight of kensho, shikantaza and kōan-study are necessary. This trajectory of initial insight followed by a gradual deepening and ripening is expressed by Linji Yixuan in his Three mysterious Gates, the Four Ways of Knowing of Hakuin, and the Ten Ox-Herding Pictures which detail the steps on the Path.


This gradual cultivation is described by contemporary Chan Master Sheng Yen as follows:

N5a8o1 500.jpg
Ch'an expressions refer to enlightenment as "seeing your self-nature". But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experience again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch'an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as of the Buddha, you are not yet a full Buddha.

The contemporary western Rev. Master Jiyu-Kennett also underscored the need of further practice:

One can easily get the impression that realization, kenshō, an experience of enlightenment, or however you wish to phrase it, is the end of Zen training. It is not. It is, rather, a new beginning, an entrance into a more mature phase of Buddhist training. To take it as an ending, and to "dine out" on such an experience without doing the training that will deepen and extend it, is one of the greatest tragedies of which I know. There must be continuous development, otherwise you will be as a wooden statue sitting upon a plinth to be dusted, and the life of Buddha will not increase.


Sudden insight

See also:Subitism

Kenshō is described as appearing suddenly, upon an interaction with someone else, at hearing or reading some significant phrase, or at the perceiving of an unexpected sound or sight. The idea of "sudden insight" has been hotly debated in the history of Zen. It became part of the Traditional Zen Narrative in the 8th century.


Chinul, a 12th-century Korean Seon master, emphasized that insight into our true nature is sudden, but is to be followed by practice to ripen the insight and attain full Buddhahood. The contemporary Korean Seon master Seongcheol opposed this, emphasizing "sudden enlightenment, sudden cultivation". But Jiyu-Kennett, a contemporary western teacher, warns that attaining kenshō does not mean that a person is free from morality, the laws of karma, or the consequences of ones actions. This warning is reflected in the Wild fox koan.


Mushi-dokugo andmushi-dokkaku

See also:Mushi-dokugo

Kenshō may be attained without the aid of a teacher, as in the case of mushi-dokugo or (mushi-)dokkaku, a self-awakened pratyeka-buddha.


Though the literal meaning is self-awakened, or awakened on one's own, the emphasis in Zen, when using these terms, lies in the ultimate reliance on one's own insight, instead of the authority of a teacher:

Images7588.jpg
It is awakening that is one's true master. With Shakyamuni, the awakening was his master. In other words, the awakened self is one's master. Apart from getting awakened to that master, there is no awakening. Here practitioner and master are of one body, not two. Instead of having another verify or confirm one's awakening, one does so for oneself. Of course in this case the self that is verified and the master who does verification are undivided. In their being completely identical is the autonomous, independent, or ultimate nature of the authenticity.


Similarities with other traditions

While the Japanese term "kenshō" is generally used by practitioners of Zen Buddhism, the insight it refers to is not limited to Japanese Zen Buddhism, or even to Buddhism in general.


Theravada

See also:Theravada, Vipassana, and Vipassana movement

]] The Theravada tradition, which is best known in the west through the modern Vipassana movement, discerns four stages of enlightenment, in which Nirvana is being reached in four succeeding sudden steps of insight.


Dzogchen

See also:Dzogchen

The Dzogchen-traditions states that the ultimate nature of all sentient beings is pure, all-encompassing, primordial awareness, or naturally occurring timeless awareness. This intrinsic awareness has no form of its own, and yet is capable of perceiving, experiencing, reflecting, or expressing all form. It does so without being affected by those forms in any ultimate, permanent way.

The analogy given by Dzogchen masters is that one's nature is like a mirror which reflects with complete openness, but is not affected by the reflections. Rigpa is the knowledge that ensues from recognizing this mirror-like clarity, which cannot be found by searching nor identified. One knows that there is a primordial freedom from grasping his or her mind.


Advaita Vedanta

In Advaita Vedanta moksha is attained by jnana, insight-knowledge. In Shankara's philosophical synthesis insight samadhi is used as a subsidiary to this goal. Swami Vivekananda emphasized the experience of nirvikalpa samadhi as a means to validate religious, transcendental knowledge.

Source

Wikipedia:Kenshō