Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Tri-svabhāva"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|250px| Tri-svabhāva (Skt.) The ‘three natures’—the dependent (paratantra), the imagined (parikalpita) and the consummate (pariniṣ...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Life-of-buddha-40.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Life-of-buddha-40.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
Tri-svabhāva (Skt.) The ‘three natures’—the dependent (paratantra), the imagined (parikalpita) and the consummate (pariniṣpanna). A key Yogācāra theory first mentioned in the Sandhi-nirmocana Sūtra, the concept of the three natures serves to explain the relationship between the experiences of saṃsāra and nirvāṇa. The theory may have arisen as a means to counter perceived shortcomings in the Madhyamaka theory of the Two Truths, which seems to create an unbridgeable hiatus between enlightenment (bodhi) and everyday experience. According to the tri-svabhāva theory, parikalpita corresponds to the mundane saṃvṛti-satya and pariniṣpanna to the supramundane paramārtha-satya, but the two are linked by paratantra, the conditioned process of experience itself, which acts as a common pivotal factor between those two. Though the three natures theory has sometimes been viewed as an ontological statement, it should more properly be understood as a model of the epistemological process—itself a major concern of the Yogācāra school.  
+
Tri-[[Svabhāva]] (Skt.) The ‘three natures’—the dependent ([[Paratantra]]), the imagined (parikalpita) and the consummate (pariniṣpanna). A key Yogācāra theory first mentioned in the Sandhi-nirmocana [[Sūtra]], the concept of the three natures serves to explain the relationship between the experiences of [[Saṃsāra]] and [[Nirvāṇa]]. The theory may have arisen as a means to counter perceived shortcomings in the [[Madhyamaka]] theory of the Two Truths, which seems to create an unbridgeable hiatus between [[Enlightenment]] ([[Bodhi]]) and everyday experience. According to the tri-[[Svabhāva]] theory, parikalpita corresponds to the mundane saṃvṛti-satya and pariniṣpanna to the supramundane paramārtha-satya, but the two are linked by [[Paratantra]], the conditioned process of experience itself, which acts as a common pivotal factor between those two. Though the three natures theory has sometimes been viewed as an ontological statement, it should more properly be understood as a model of the epistemological process—itself a major concern of the [[Yogācāra School]].  
  
 
See also grāhya-grāhaka.
 
See also grāhya-grāhaka.

Revision as of 01:15, 30 April 2013

Life-of-buddha-40.jpg

Tri-Svabhāva (Skt.) The ‘three natures’—the dependent (Paratantra), the imagined (parikalpita) and the consummate (pariniṣpanna). A key Yogācāra theory first mentioned in the Sandhi-nirmocana Sūtra, the concept of the three natures serves to explain the relationship between the experiences of Saṃsāra and Nirvāṇa. The theory may have arisen as a means to counter perceived shortcomings in the Madhyamaka theory of the Two Truths, which seems to create an unbridgeable hiatus between Enlightenment (Bodhi) and everyday experience. According to the tri-Svabhāva theory, parikalpita corresponds to the mundane saṃvṛti-satya and pariniṣpanna to the supramundane paramārtha-satya, but the two are linked by Paratantra, the conditioned process of experience itself, which acts as a common pivotal factor between those two. Though the three natures theory has sometimes been viewed as an ontological statement, it should more properly be understood as a model of the epistemological process—itself a major concern of the Yogācāra School.

See also grāhya-grāhaka.

Source

www.answers.com