Difference between revisions of "Two truths"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ Quotations: Dharmakirti, Commentary on Valid Cognition, That which performs a function is ultimately existent
(Redirected page to Two Truths Doctrine) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
+ | [[Two truths]] (Skt. ''dvasatya''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[བདེན་པ་གཉིས་]]}}, [[Wyl.]] ''bden pa gnyis'') — everything has an [[absolute]] aspect, or [[absolute truth]], and a [[relative]] aspect, or [[relative truth]]. The [[absolute]] or [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] is the [[inherent]] [[nature]] of everything, how things really are. The [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] or [[relative]] is how things appear. In the teachings, these are known as ‘the [[two truths]]’, but they are not to be understood as two separate {{Wiki|dimensions}}, rather as two aspects of a single [[reality]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==From the [[Sutras]]== | ||
+ | {{:Quotations: Sutra of the Meeting of Father and Son}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==The [[Two Truths]] According to the [[Four tenet systems|Four Schools]]== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===The [[Vaibhashika]] [[View]]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Khenpo Ngakchung]] says: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :The ''[[Abhidharmakosha]]'' says: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Things which, when destroyed or [[mentally]] dissected,<br> | ||
+ | ::Can no longer be identified by the [[mind]],<br> | ||
+ | ::Such as pots or [[water]], are [[relative]];<br> | ||
+ | ::All else besides is ultimately [[existent]].<br> | ||
+ | ::''[[Treasury of Abhidharma]]'', VI, 4<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | :As this says, any coarse thing which can be smashed to pieces with a hammer or dissected into parts by the [[mind]], so that the [[mind]] which apprehended that coarse [[appearance]] no longer identifies it as such, belongs to the '''[[relative truth]]'''. Then concerning the [[absolute]], any coarse material thing or [[state of consciousness]] can be broken down into its [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] constituents, which are {{Wiki|individual}} particles or moments. Therefore the [[partless particle]]s, which are the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] constituents of coarser things, and the [[indivisible moments of consciousness]], which are the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] constituents of [[mental phenomena]], are said to be '''[[absolute truth]]'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===The [[Sautrantika]] [[View]]=== | ||
+ | [[Khenpo Ngakchung]] says: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Then, if we consider the [[Sautrantikas]], it says in the ''[[Commentary on Valid Cognition]]''<ref>{{:Quotations: Dharmakirti, Commentary on Valid Cognition, That which performs a function is ultimately existent}}</ref>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::"That which can perform a [[function]]<br> | ||
+ | ::Is here said to be ultimately [[existent]].<br> | ||
+ | ::All that can not perform a [[function]]<br> | ||
+ | ::Is said to be relatively [[existent]].<br> | ||
+ | ::These are specific and [[general]] {{Wiki|characteristics}}."<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | :So, here, in this context, anything with unique {{Wiki|characteristics}} that can perform a [[function]] is said to be [[absolute truth]], and anything that is generally characterized and can not perform a [[function]] is said to belong merely to [[relative truth]]. Although things are explained this way when analyzing things so as to determine whether or not they have unique {{Wiki|characteristics}}, this does not mean to say that there are not other classifications of the [[two truths]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===The [[Chittamatra]] [[View]]=== | ||
+ | [[Khenpo Ngakchung]] says: | ||
+ | :All the [[dualistic]] [[phenomena]] of the imputed [[nature]] and the [[mind]] and [[mental phenomena]] of the dependent [[nature]] are the deceiving [[phenomena]] of [[delusion]], the '''[[relative truth]]'''. The [[essence]] of the dependent [[nature]], which is the naturally luminous [[consciousness]], and the fully established [[nature]], which is the fact that this [i.e., the dependent [[nature]]] is [[empty]] of the [[dualistic]] {{Wiki|projections}} of the imputed nature—comprising the [[nature of reality]] and wisdom—are said to be the '''[[absolute truth]]'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Teachings to the [[Rigpa Sangha]]== | ||
+ | *[[Ringu Tulku Rinpoche]], [[Lerab Ling]], 14-16 May 2010 | ||
+ | *[[Khenpo Pema Sherab]], [[Lerab Ling]], 26-28 May 2011 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Further Reading== | ||
+ | *[[Kangyur Rinpoche]], ''[[Treasury of Precious Qualities]]'' (Boston & {{Wiki|London}}: [[Shambhala]], 2001), 'Appendix 7' on the [[two truths]] according to the [[Madhyamika]] [[view]]. | ||
+ | *[[Thinley Norbu]], ''[[The Small Golden Key]]'' ([[Shambhala Publications]], 1999), ‘8. The [[Two Truths]]'. | ||
+ | *[[Khenpo Palden Sherab]] [[Rinpoche]], ''Ceasless Echoes of the Great [[Silence]], a Commentary on the [[Heart Sutra]]''. Translated by [[Khenpo Tsewang Dongyal Rinpoche]]. Pages 59-64. Published by Sky Dancer Press. ISBN 1-880976-01-7 |
Revision as of 20:06, 13 January 2014
Two truths (Skt. dvasatya; Tib. བདེན་པ་གཉིས་, Wyl. bden pa gnyis) — everything has an absolute aspect, or absolute truth, and a relative aspect, or relative truth. The absolute or ultimate is the inherent nature of everything, how things really are. The conventional or relative is how things appear. In the teachings, these are known as ‘the two truths’, but they are not to be understood as two separate dimensions, rather as two aspects of a single reality.
Contents
From the Sutras
Quotations: Sutra of the Meeting of Father and Son
The Two Truths According to the Four Schools
The Vaibhashika View
Khenpo Ngakchung says:
- The Abhidharmakosha says:
- As this says, any coarse thing which can be smashed to pieces with a hammer or dissected into parts by the mind, so that the mind which apprehended that coarse appearance no longer identifies it as such, belongs to the relative truth. Then concerning the absolute, any coarse material thing or state of consciousness can be broken down into its ultimate constituents, which are individual particles or moments. Therefore the partless particles, which are the ultimate constituents of coarser things, and the indivisible moments of consciousness, which are the ultimate constituents of mental phenomena, are said to be absolute truth.
The Sautrantika View
Khenpo Ngakchung says:
- Then, if we consider the Sautrantikas, it says in the Commentary on Valid Cognition[1]:
- So, here, in this context, anything with unique characteristics that can perform a function is said to be absolute truth, and anything that is generally characterized and can not perform a function is said to belong merely to relative truth. Although things are explained this way when analyzing things so as to determine whether or not they have unique characteristics, this does not mean to say that there are not other classifications of the two truths.
The Chittamatra View
Khenpo Ngakchung says:
- All the dualistic phenomena of the imputed nature and the mind and mental phenomena of the dependent nature are the deceiving phenomena of delusion, the relative truth. The essence of the dependent nature, which is the naturally luminous consciousness, and the fully established nature, which is the fact that this [i.e., the dependent nature] is empty of the dualistic projections of the imputed nature—comprising the nature of reality and wisdom—are said to be the absolute truth.
Teachings to the Rigpa Sangha
- Ringu Tulku Rinpoche, Lerab Ling, 14-16 May 2010
- Khenpo Pema Sherab, Lerab Ling, 26-28 May 2011
Further Reading
- Kangyur Rinpoche, Treasury of Precious Qualities (Boston & London: Shambhala, 2001), 'Appendix 7' on the two truths according to the Madhyamika view.
- Thinley Norbu, The Small Golden Key (Shambhala Publications, 1999), ‘8. The Two Truths'.
- Khenpo Palden Sherab Rinpoche, Ceasless Echoes of the Great Silence, a Commentary on the Heart Sutra. Translated by Khenpo Tsewang Dongyal Rinpoche. Pages 59-64. Published by Sky Dancer Press. ISBN 1-880976-01-7