Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Śāntarakṣita"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision: Robo replace 16sept)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Śāntarakṣita13.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Śāntarakṣita13.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
'''[[Śāntarakṣita]]''' ([[Sanskrit]]: शान्तरक्षित) (725-788) was a renowned 8th century [[Indian]] [[Buddhist]] [[Brahmin]] and [[abbot]] of [[Nalanda]] University. [[Śāntarakṣita]] founded the [[philosophical]] school known as Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka, which united the [[Madhyamaka]] [[tradition]] of [[Nagarjuna]], the [[Yogacara]] [[tradition]] of [[Asanga]] and the [[logical]] and {{Wiki|epistemological}} [[thought]] of [[Dharmakirti]]. He was also instrumental in the introduction of [[Buddhism]] and the [[Sarvastivadin]] [[monastic]] ordination [[lineage]] to [[Tibet]] which was conducted at [[Samye]].
+
'''[[Śāntarakṣita]]''' ([[Sanskrit]]: शान्तरक्षित) (725-788) was a renowned 8th century [[Indian]] [[Buddhist]] [[Brahmin]] and [[abbot]] of [[Nalanda]] [[University]]. [[Śāntarakṣita]] founded the [[philosophical]] school known as Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka, which united the [[Madhyamaka]] [[tradition]] of [[Nagarjuna]], the [[Yogacara]] [[tradition]] of [[Asanga]] and the [[logical]] and {{Wiki|epistemological}} [[thought]] of [[Dharmakirti]]. He was also instrumental in the introduction of [[Buddhism]] and the [[Sarvastivadin]] [[monastic]] [[ordination]] [[lineage]] to [[Tibet]] which was conducted at [[Samye]].
  
[[Padmakara]] Translation Group (2005: p. 3) ground Shantarakshita's [[Dharma]] in [[Buddhism]] and the [[Hinduism]] from which it, [[Buddhism]], seceded:
+
[[Padmakara]] Translation Group (2005: p. 3) ground [[Shantarakshita's]] [[Dharma]] in [[Buddhism]] and the [[Hinduism]] from which it, [[Buddhism]], seceded:
  
:    Shantarakshita's writings, lost for the most part in [[Sanskrit]] but preserved in [[Tibetan]] translation, give evidence of the encyclopedic range of his {{Wiki|learning}}, which embraced all the [[religious]] and [[philosophical]] currents of his time, [[Hindu]] and [[Buddhist]] alike.
+
:    [[Shantarakshita's]] writings, lost for the most part in [[Sanskrit]] but preserved in [[Tibetan]] translation, give {{Wiki|evidence}} of the {{Wiki|encyclopedic}} range of his {{Wiki|learning}}, which embraced all the [[religious]] and [[philosophical]] currents of his [[time]], [[Hindu]] and [[Buddhist]] alike.
  
== Nomenclature, orthography and {{Wiki|etymology}} ==
+
== {{Wiki|Nomenclature}}, {{Wiki|orthography}} and {{Wiki|etymology}} ==
  
[[Śāntarakṣita]] (Devanagari: शान्तरक्षित, also called [[Shantarakshita]], [[Santaraksita]], [[Santiraksita]], [[Zhi-ba-tsho]], and [[Acarya Bodhisattva]] )
+
[[Śāntarakṣita]] ({{Wiki|Devanagari}}: शान्तरक्षित, also called [[Shantarakshita]], [[Santaraksita]], [[Santiraksita]], [[Zhi-ba-tsho]], and [[Acarya Bodhisattva]] )
  
*    [[Tibetan]]: ཞི་བ་ཚོ, Wylie: [[zhi ba tsho]] where 'zhi ba' holds the semantic field: beatitude, quiescence, inner [[peace]], [[tranquility]], [[serenity]] and 'tsho' holds the semantic field: complexion, comportment.
+
*    [[Tibetan]]: {{BigTibetan|ཞི་བ་ཚོ}}, Wylie: [[zhi ba tsho]] where 'zhi ba' holds the {{Wiki|semantic}} field: beatitude, quiescence, inner [[peace]], [[tranquility]], [[serenity]] and 'tsho' holds the {{Wiki|semantic}} field: complexion, comportment.
  
== History ==
+
== {{Wiki|History}} ==
  
There are few historical records of [[Śāntarakṣita]], with most available material [[being]] from hagiographic sources. Some of his history is detailed in a 19th century commentary by [[Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso]] drawn from sources like the Blue Annals, Büton, and [[Taranatha]]. [[Śāntarakṣita]] was the son of the king of Zahor.  Some identify 'Zahor' with a place in ancient Bengal
+
There are few historical records of [[Śāntarakṣita]], with most available {{Wiki|material}} [[being]] from hagiographic sources. Some of his {{Wiki|history}} is detailed in a 19th century commentary by [[Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso]] drawn from sources like the [[Blue Annals]], Büton, and [[Taranatha]]. [[Śāntarakṣita]] was the son of the [[king]] of [[Zahor]].  Some identify '[[Zahor]]' with a place in {{Wiki|ancient}} {{Wiki|Bengal}}
  
[[Śāntarakṣita]] was brought to [[Tibet]] at the instigation of [[King Trisong Detsen]] sometime before 767 CE. One account details his first trip as unsuccessful and he spent six years in [[Nepal]] before returning to [[Tibet]]. Once established in [[Tibet]], [[Śāntarakṣita]] oversaw the translation of a large [[body]] of scriptures into [[Tibetan]]. He oversaw the construction of the first [[Buddhist]] [[monastery]] at [[Samye]] in 787 CE and [[ordained]] the first monastics there. He stayed at [[Samye]] for the rest of his [[life]], another 13 years after its completion, and this was considered significant by [[Tibetans]] later that he stayed and did not return to [[India]].
+
[[Śāntarakṣita]] was brought to [[Tibet]] at the instigation of [[King Trisong Detsen]] sometime before 767 CE. One account details his first trip as unsuccessful and he spent six years in [[Nepal]] before returning to [[Tibet]]. Once established in [[Tibet]], [[Śāntarakṣita]] oversaw the translation of a large [[body]] of [[scriptures]] into [[Tibetan]]. He oversaw the construction of the first [[Buddhist]] [[monastery]] at [[Samye]] in 787 CE and [[ordained]] the first [[monastics]] there. He stayed at [[Samye]] for the [[rest]] of his [[life]], another 13 years after its completion, and this was considered significant by [[Tibetans]] later that he stayed and did not return to [[India]].
  
In some accounts he left [[Tibet]] for a time due to the antipathy of followers of the [[traditional]] [[Bön]] [[tradition]] and interference from local [[spirits]].
+
In some accounts he left [[Tibet]] for a [[time]] due to the antipathy of followers of the [[traditional]] [[Bön]] [[tradition]] and interference from local [[spirits]].
  
:    He then [[thought]] that a [[teacher]] possessed of super-natural [[powers]] and {{Wiki|mystic}} charms would be able to move deeply the [[people]] of [[Tibet]], steeped in sorcery exorcism and the like. Accordingly, he advised the {{Wiki|King}} to invite the celebrated [[Buddhist]] [[teacher]] [[Padmasambhava]] to [[Tibet]] and subdue the [[Tibetan]] devils and demi-gods.
+
:    He then [[thought]] that a [[teacher]] possessed of super-natural [[powers]] and {{Wiki|mystic}} charms would be able to move deeply the [[people]] of [[Tibet]], steeped in sorcery {{Wiki|exorcism}} and the like. Accordingly, he advised the {{Wiki|King}} to invite the celebrated [[Buddhist]] [[teacher]] [[Padmasambhava]] to [[Tibet]] and subdue the [[Tibetan]] {{Wiki|devils}} and [[demi-gods]].
  
His [[philosophic]] [[views]] were the main [[views]] in [[Tibet]] from the 8th century until it was mostly supplanted by Je Tsongkhapa's interpretation of [[Prasaṅgika]] [[Madhyamaka]] in the 15th century. In the late 19th century, [[Ju Mipham]] attempted to promote his [[views]] again as part of the [[Rime]] movement and as a way to discuss specific critiques of Je Tsongkhapa's interpretation of [[Prasaṅgika]].
+
His [[philosophic]] [[views]] were the main [[views]] in [[Tibet]] from the 8th century until it was mostly supplanted by [[Je Tsongkhapa's]] interpretation of [[Prasaṅgika]] [[Madhyamaka]] in the 15th century. In the late 19th century, [[Ju Mipham]] attempted to promote his [[views]] again as part of the [[Rime]] {{Wiki|movement}} and as a way to discuss specific critiques of [[Je Tsongkhapa's]] interpretation of [[Prasaṅgika]].
  
 
== Teachings ==
 
== Teachings ==
  
We know that [[Śāntarakṣita]] focused his early teachings in [[Tibet]] directed to the 'seven that were tested' upon the 'ten [[virtues]]' ([[Tibetan]]: དགེ་བ་བཅུ, Wylie: dge ba bcu; [[Sanskrit]]: daśakuśala; [[Pali]]: dasa sikkhapadani or dasa [[sila]]) and 'the chain of casual relation' ([[Sanskrit]]: [[pratītyasamutpāda]]). The ten [[virtues]] are the opposite of the 'ten [[non-virtues]]' ([[Tibetan]]: མི་དགེ་བ་བཅུ, Wylie: mi dge ba bcu; [[Sanskrit]]: daśākuśala).
+
We know that [[Śāntarakṣita]] focused his early teachings in [[Tibet]] directed to the 'seven that were tested' upon the 'ten [[virtues]]' ([[Tibetan]]: {{BigTibetan|དགེ་བ་བཅུ}}, Wylie: dge ba bcu; [[Sanskrit]]: daśakuśala; [[Pali]]: dasa sikkhapadani or dasa [[sila]]) and 'the chain of casual [[relation]]' ([[Sanskrit]]: [[pratītyasamutpāda]]). The ten [[virtues]] are the {{Wiki|opposite}} of the 'ten [[non-virtues]]' ([[Tibetan]]: {{BigTibetan|མི་དགེ་བ་བཅུ}}, Wylie: mi dge ba bcu; [[Sanskrit]]: daśākuśala).
  
 
=== [[Disciples]] ===
 
=== [[Disciples]] ===
Haribhadra (Seng-ge Bzang-po)
+
[[Haribhadra]] (Seng-ge Bzang-po)
  
 
== [[Views]] ==
 
== [[Views]] ==
  
Śāntarakṣita's synthesis of [[Madhyamaka]], [[Yogacara]], and Pramana was expounded in his text [[Madhyamākalaṃkāra]]. Within the [[Yogacara]] in that text he also included the [[Sautrantika]] and "[[consciousness-only]]" [[views]] specifically when referring to '[[conventional truth]]', one of the [[two truths]] [[doctrine]]. His [[view]] is therefore categorized as "Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka" by later [[Tibetans]], but he did not refer to himself that way.
+
[[Śāntarakṣita's]] synthesis of [[Madhyamaka]], [[Yogacara]], and [[Pramana]] was expounded in his text [[Madhyamākalaṃkāra]]. Within the [[Yogacara]] in that text he also included the [[Sautrantika]] and "[[consciousness-only]]" [[views]] specifically when referring to '[[conventional truth]]', one of the [[two truths]] [[doctrine]]. His [[view]] is therefore categorized as "Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka" by later [[Tibetans]], but he did not refer to himself that way.
  
In his synthesis text, readers are advised to adopt [[Madhyamaka]] [[view]] and approach from [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]] when analyzing for ultimacy and to adopt the [[mind-only]] [[views]] of the Yogacarans [[Asanga]] and [[Vasubandhu]] when considering [[conventional truth]]. He also incorporates the [[logic]] approach of valid [[cognition]] and the Sautantrika [[views]] of [[Dignāga]] and [[Dharmakirti]].
+
In his synthesis text, readers are advised to adopt [[Madhyamaka]] [[view]] and approach from [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Aryadeva]] when analyzing for ultimacy and to adopt the [[mind-only]] [[views]] of the Yogacarans [[Asanga]] and [[Vasubandhu]] when considering [[conventional truth]]. He also incorporates the [[logic]] approach of valid [[cognition]] and the [[Sautantrika]] [[views]] of [[Dignāga]] and [[Dharmakirti]].
  
[[Śāntarakṣita]] is also known for his text [[Tattvasamgraha]] "Compendium on [[Reality]]", which is a more encyclopedic treatment of the major [[philosophic]] [[views]] of the time and survived in translation in both [[Tibet]] and [[China]]. A [[Sanskrit]] version of this work was discovered in 1873 by Dr. G. Bühler in the [[Jain]] [[Dharma]] [[temple]] of Parshva at Jaisalmer. This version contains also the commentary by Śāntarakṣita's pupil Kamalaśīla.
+
[[Śāntarakṣita]] is also known for his text [[Tattvasamgraha]] "Compendium on [[Reality]]", which is a more {{Wiki|encyclopedic}} treatment of the major [[philosophic]] [[views]] of the [[time]] and survived in translation in both [[Tibet]] and [[China]]. A [[Sanskrit]] version of this work was discovered in 1873 by Dr. G. Bühler in the [[Jain]] [[Dharma]] [[temple]] of [[Parshva]] at Jaisalmer. This version contains also the commentary by [[Śāntarakṣita's]] pupil [[Kamalaśīla]].
  
== Ju Mipham's Revival of Śāntarakṣita's [[Tradition]] ==
+
== Ju Mipham's Revival of [[Śāntarakṣita's]] [[Tradition]] ==
  
In the 19th century, a movement funded by the secular authorities in [[Derge]], [[Kham]] began to establish centers of {{Wiki|learning}} encouraging the study of [[traditions]] different from the dominant [[Gelug]] [[tradition]] in central [[Tibet]]. This now called [[rime]] movement revitalized the [[Sakya]], [[Kagyu]], and [[Nyingma]] [[traditions]] who had been by almost supplanted by the [[Gelug]] hegemony.  As part of that movement the 19th century [[Nyingma]] [[scholar]] [[Ju Mipham]] wrote the first commentary in almost 400 years about Shantarakshita's [[Madhyamakalankara]]. According to his student Kunzang Palden, [[Mipham]] had been asked by his [[teacher]] [[Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo]] to write a survey of all the major [[Mahayana]] [[philosophic]] [[shastras]] for use in the [[Nyingma]] [[monastic]] colleges.  Mipham's commentaries now [[form]] the backbone of the [[Nyingma]] [[monastic]] curriculum. Shantarakshita's [[Madhyamakalankara]], which was almost forgotten by the 19th century,  is now studied by all [[Nyingma]] shedra students.
+
In the 19th century, a {{Wiki|movement}} funded by the secular authorities in [[Derge]], [[Kham]] began to establish centers of {{Wiki|learning}} encouraging the study of [[traditions]] different from the dominant [[Gelug]] [[tradition]] in {{Wiki|central}} [[Tibet]]. This now called [[rime]] {{Wiki|movement}} revitalized the [[Sakya]], [[Kagyu]], and [[Nyingma]] [[traditions]] who had been by almost supplanted by the [[Gelug]] hegemony.  As part of that {{Wiki|movement}} the 19th century [[Nyingma]] [[scholar]] [[Ju Mipham]] wrote the first commentary in almost 400 years about [[Shantarakshita's]] [[Madhyamakalankara]]. According to his student Kunzang Palden, [[Mipham]] had been asked by his [[teacher]] [[Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo]] to write a survey of all the major [[Mahayana]] [[philosophic]] [[shastras]] for use in the [[Nyingma]] [[monastic]] {{Wiki|colleges}}.  Mipham's commentaries now [[form]] the backbone of the [[Nyingma]] [[monastic]] {{Wiki|curriculum}}. [[Shantarakshita's]] [[Madhyamakalankara]], which was almost forgotten by the 19th century,  is now studied by all [[Nyingma]] [[shedra]] students.
 
{{W}}
 
{{W}}
  

Revision as of 00:35, 30 September 2013

Śāntarakṣita13.jpg

Śāntarakṣita (Sanskrit: शान्तरक्षित) (725-788) was a renowned 8th century Indian Buddhist Brahmin and abbot of Nalanda University. Śāntarakṣita founded the philosophical school known as Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka, which united the Madhyamaka tradition of Nagarjuna, the Yogacara tradition of Asanga and the logical and epistemological thought of Dharmakirti. He was also instrumental in the introduction of Buddhism and the Sarvastivadin monastic ordination lineage to Tibet which was conducted at Samye.

Padmakara Translation Group (2005: p. 3) ground Shantarakshita's Dharma in Buddhism and the Hinduism from which it, Buddhism, seceded:

Shantarakshita's writings, lost for the most part in Sanskrit but preserved in Tibetan translation, give evidence of the encyclopedic range of his learning, which embraced all the religious and philosophical currents of his time, Hindu and Buddhist alike.

Nomenclature, orthography and etymology

Śāntarakṣita (Devanagari: शान्तरक्षित, also called Shantarakshita, Santaraksita, Santiraksita, Zhi-ba-tsho, and Acarya Bodhisattva )

History

There are few historical records of Śāntarakṣita, with most available material being from hagiographic sources. Some of his history is detailed in a 19th century commentary by Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso drawn from sources like the Blue Annals, Büton, and Taranatha. Śāntarakṣita was the son of the king of Zahor. Some identify 'Zahor' with a place in ancient Bengal

Śāntarakṣita was brought to Tibet at the instigation of King Trisong Detsen sometime before 767 CE. One account details his first trip as unsuccessful and he spent six years in Nepal before returning to Tibet. Once established in Tibet, Śāntarakṣita oversaw the translation of a large body of scriptures into Tibetan. He oversaw the construction of the first Buddhist monastery at Samye in 787 CE and ordained the first monastics there. He stayed at Samye for the rest of his life, another 13 years after its completion, and this was considered significant by Tibetans later that he stayed and did not return to India.

In some accounts he left Tibet for a time due to the antipathy of followers of the traditional Bön tradition and interference from local spirits.

He then thought that a teacher possessed of super-natural powers and mystic charms would be able to move deeply the people of Tibet, steeped in sorcery exorcism and the like. Accordingly, he advised the King to invite the celebrated Buddhist teacher Padmasambhava to Tibet and subdue the Tibetan devils and demi-gods.

His philosophic views were the main views in Tibet from the 8th century until it was mostly supplanted by Je Tsongkhapa's interpretation of Prasaṅgika Madhyamaka in the 15th century. In the late 19th century, Ju Mipham attempted to promote his views again as part of the Rime movement and as a way to discuss specific critiques of Je Tsongkhapa's interpretation of Prasaṅgika.

Teachings

We know that Śāntarakṣita focused his early teachings in Tibet directed to the 'seven that were tested' upon the 'ten virtues' (Tibetan: དགེ་བ་བཅུ, Wylie: dge ba bcu; Sanskrit: daśakuśala; Pali: dasa sikkhapadani or dasa sila) and 'the chain of casual relation' (Sanskrit: pratītyasamutpāda). The ten virtues are the opposite of the 'ten non-virtues' (Tibetan: མི་དགེ་བ་བཅུ, Wylie: mi dge ba bcu; Sanskrit: daśākuśala).

Disciples

Haribhadra (Seng-ge Bzang-po)

Views

Śāntarakṣita's synthesis of Madhyamaka, Yogacara, and Pramana was expounded in his text Madhyamākalaṃkāra. Within the Yogacara in that text he also included the Sautrantika and "consciousness-only" views specifically when referring to 'conventional truth', one of the two truths doctrine. His view is therefore categorized as "Yogacara-Svatantrika-Madhyamaka" by later Tibetans, but he did not refer to himself that way.

In his synthesis text, readers are advised to adopt Madhyamaka view and approach from Nagarjuna and Aryadeva when analyzing for ultimacy and to adopt the mind-only views of the Yogacarans Asanga and Vasubandhu when considering conventional truth. He also incorporates the logic approach of valid cognition and the Sautantrika views of Dignāga and Dharmakirti.

Śāntarakṣita is also known for his text Tattvasamgraha "Compendium on Reality", which is a more encyclopedic treatment of the major philosophic views of the time and survived in translation in both Tibet and China. A Sanskrit version of this work was discovered in 1873 by Dr. G. Bühler in the Jain Dharma temple of Parshva at Jaisalmer. This version contains also the commentary by Śāntarakṣita's pupil Kamalaśīla.

Ju Mipham's Revival of Śāntarakṣita's Tradition

In the 19th century, a movement funded by the secular authorities in Derge, Kham began to establish centers of learning encouraging the study of traditions different from the dominant Gelug tradition in central Tibet. This now called rime movement revitalized the Sakya, Kagyu, and Nyingma traditions who had been by almost supplanted by the Gelug hegemony. As part of that movement the 19th century Nyingma scholar Ju Mipham wrote the first commentary in almost 400 years about Shantarakshita's Madhyamakalankara. According to his student Kunzang Palden, Mipham had been asked by his teacher Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo to write a survey of all the major Mahayana philosophic shastras for use in the Nyingma monastic colleges. Mipham's commentaries now form the backbone of the Nyingma monastic curriculum. Shantarakshita's Madhyamakalankara, which was almost forgotten by the 19th century, is now studied by all Nyingma shedra students.

Source

Wikipedia:Śāntarakṣita