Difference between revisions of "Doubt"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Doubt.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:Doubt.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
| + | [[Doubt]] (Skt. ''[[vicikitsā]]''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[ཐེ་ཚོམ་]]}}, ''[[tétsom]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[the tshom]]'') is one of the [[six root destructive emotions]] and one of the [[seven kinds of cognition]] identified in [[Buddhist logic]] and [[epistemology]]. As defined in the [[Abhidharma]], it is characterized by uncertainty as regards the [[truth]] and acts as the basis for not engaging oneself in [[virtue]]. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Sogyal Rinpoche]] writes: |
| − | + | : I sometimes think that [[doubt]] is an even greater block to {{Wiki|human evolution}} than [[desire]] and [[attachment]]. Our {{Wiki|society}} promotes [[cleverness]] instead of [[wisdom]], and celebrates the most [[superficial]], harsh, and least useful aspects of our [[intelligence]]. We have become so falsely "sophisticated" and neurotic that we take [[doubt]] itself for [[truth]], and the [[doubt]] that is nothing more than ego's desperate attempt to defend itself from [[wisdom]] is deified as the goal and fruit of true [[knowledge]]. This [[form]] of mean-spirited [[doubt]] is the shabby [[emperor]] of [[samsara]], served by a flock of "experts" who teach us not the open-souled and generous [[doubt]] that [[Buddha]] assured us was necessary for testing and proving the worth of the teachings, but a {{Wiki|destructive}} [[form]] of [[doubt]] that leaves us nothing to believe in, nothing to {{Wiki|hope}} for, and nothing to live by.<ref>[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', revised and updated edition, {{Wiki|Harper San Francisco}}, 2002, page 127.</ref> | |
| − | :I sometimes think that [[doubt]] is an even greater block to {{Wiki|human evolution}} than [[desire]] and [[attachment]]. Our {{Wiki|society}} promotes [[cleverness]] instead of [[wisdom]], and celebrates the most [[superficial]], harsh, and least useful aspects of our [[intelligence]]. We have become so falsely "sophisticated" and neurotic that we take [[doubt]] itself for [[truth]], and the [[doubt]] that is nothing more than ego's desperate attempt to defend itself from [[wisdom]] is deified as the goal and fruit of true [[knowledge]]. This [[form]] of mean-spirited [[doubt]] is the shabby [[emperor]] of [[samsara]], served by a flock of "experts" who teach us not the open-souled and generous [[doubt]] that [[Buddha]] assured us was necessary for testing and proving the worth of the teachings, but a {{Wiki|destructive}} [[form]] of [[doubt]] that leaves us nothing to believe in, nothing to {{Wiki|hope}} for, and nothing to live by.<ref>[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', revised and updated edition, | ||
==Subdivisions== | ==Subdivisions== | ||
| − | [[His Holiness the Dalai Lama]] says: "There are actually three types of [[doubt]]: incorrect [[doubt]], uncertain [[doubt]], and correct [[doubt]]. The first type involves starting to think about the [[truth]] but still doubting it is correct. The second is more open but ambivalent and unsure of what is correct or incorrect. The third is when we start to believe in the [[truth]]."<ref> | + | |
| + | [[His Holiness the Dalai Lama]] says: | ||
| + | |||
| + | : "There are actually three types of [[doubt]]: incorrect [[doubt]], uncertain [[doubt]], and correct [[doubt]]. The first type involves starting to think about the [[truth]] but still doubting it is correct. The second is more open but ambivalent and unsure of what is correct or incorrect. The third is when we start to believe in the [[truth]]."<ref>{{Nolinking|"Mind in Comfort and Ease", p.67}}</ref> | ||
==Alternative Translations== | ==Alternative Translations== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== | ||
| − | *[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', revised and updated edition ( | + | *{{Nolinking|[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', revised and updated edition ({{Wiki|Harper San Francisco}}, 2002), 'Doubts on the Path', pages 126-130.}} |
| − | + | {{reflist}} | |
| − | |||
| + | {{RigpaWiki}} | ||
| + | {{NewSourceBreak}} | ||
| + | [[Doubt]] (''[[vicikicchā]]'') is the [[state of being]] uncertain about something and is often accompanied by [[feelings]] of unease and discomfort. Other expressions of [[doubt]] are {{Wiki|scepticism}}, mistrust, hesitation and {{Wiki|perplexity}}. In [[Buddhist psychology]], [[doubt]] is seen as having both negative and positive roles. When [[doubt]] about the [[Dhamma]] [[causes]] wavering, indecisiveness and hesitancy about practicing then it is seen as a [[hindrance]] (A.I,61). When it motivates one to seek clarification and to investigate a matter more deeply then it can lead to [[understanding]]. When the Kālāmas told the [[Buddha]] that they had [[doubts]] about all the different [[beliefs]] they were [[being]] bombarded with, he replied: ‘It is good to [[doubt]], it is good to be undecided about matters that are [[doubtful]].’ (A.I,188). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
[http://www.buddhisma2z.com/content.php?id=115 www.buddhisma2z.com] | [http://www.buddhisma2z.com/content.php?id=115 www.buddhisma2z.com] | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Buddhist psychology]] | [[Category:Buddhist psychology]] | ||
[[Category:Pramāṇa]] | [[Category:Pramāṇa]] | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 20 April 2014
Doubt (Skt. vicikitsā; Tib. ཐེ་ཚོམ་, tétsom; Wyl. the tshom) is one of the six root destructive emotions and one of the seven kinds of cognition identified in Buddhist logic and epistemology. As defined in the Abhidharma, it is characterized by uncertainty as regards the truth and acts as the basis for not engaging oneself in virtue.
Sogyal Rinpoche writes:
- I sometimes think that doubt is an even greater block to human evolution than desire and attachment. Our society promotes cleverness instead of wisdom, and celebrates the most superficial, harsh, and least useful aspects of our intelligence. We have become so falsely "sophisticated" and neurotic that we take doubt itself for truth, and the doubt that is nothing more than ego's desperate attempt to defend itself from wisdom is deified as the goal and fruit of true knowledge. This form of mean-spirited doubt is the shabby emperor of samsara, served by a flock of "experts" who teach us not the open-souled and generous doubt that Buddha assured us was necessary for testing and proving the worth of the teachings, but a destructive form of doubt that leaves us nothing to believe in, nothing to hope for, and nothing to live by.[1]
Subdivisions
His Holiness the Dalai Lama says:
- "There are actually three types of doubt: incorrect doubt, uncertain doubt, and correct doubt. The first type involves starting to think about the truth but still doubting it is correct. The second is more open but ambivalent and unsure of what is correct or incorrect. The third is when we start to believe in the truth."[2]
Alternative Translations
- indecision
- skepticism
Further Reading
- Sogyal Rinpoche, The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, revised and updated edition (Harper San Francisco, 2002), 'Doubts on the Path', pages 126-130.
Footnotes
- ↑ Sogyal Rinpoche, The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, revised and updated edition, Harper San Francisco, 2002, page 127.
- ↑ "Mind in Comfort and Ease", p.67
Source
Doubt (vicikicchā) is the state of being uncertain about something and is often accompanied by feelings of unease and discomfort. Other expressions of doubt are scepticism, mistrust, hesitation and perplexity. In Buddhist psychology, doubt is seen as having both negative and positive roles. When doubt about the Dhamma causes wavering, indecisiveness and hesitancy about practicing then it is seen as a hindrance (A.I,61). When it motivates one to seek clarification and to investigate a matter more deeply then it can lead to understanding. When the Kālāmas told the Buddha that they had doubts about all the different beliefs they were being bombarded with, he replied: ‘It is good to doubt, it is good to be undecided about matters that are doubtful.’ (A.I,188).
