Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Mahādeva"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|250px| <poem> Mahādeva (Sanskrit: महादेव; Chinese: 大天; pinyin: Dàtiān) is a controversial figure who appears in vario...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Shuayan.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Shuayan.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
<poem>
 
<poem>
[[Mahādeva]] ([[Sanskrit]]: महादेव; Chinese: 大天; pinyin: [[Dàtiān]]) is a controversial figure who appears in various roles in the histories of the [[early Buddhist schools]].
+
[[Mahādeva]] ([[Sanskrit]]: महादेव; {{Wiki|Chinese}}: [[大天]]; pinyin: [[Dàtiān]]) is a controversial figure who appears in various roles in the histories of the [[early Buddhist schools]].
  
'''Various roles and existence'''
+
'''Various roles and [[existence]]'''
As the cause of the first schism
+
As the [[cause]] of the first [[schism]]
  
Various sources present [[Mahādeva]] as playing different roles, and the historical existence of such a person is often criticized. In sources deriving from the [[Sthaviravāda]] branch, he is taken to be the founder of the [[Mahāsāṃghikas]], and the figure who caused the split between the two branches.  According to this account, some 35 years after the [[Second Buddhist Council]] at {{Wiki|Pāṭaliputra}}, there was another meeting over five points allegedly held by a figure named [[Mahādeva]].  These five points were essentially regarding [[doctrines]] of the fallibility and imperfection of [[arhats]], which were opposed by some.  In this account, the majority ([[Mahāsaṃgha]]) sided with [[Mahādeva]], and the minority ([[Sthaviras]]) were opposed to it, thus causing a split in the [[Saṃgha]].  
+
Various sources {{Wiki|present}} [[Mahādeva]] as playing different roles, and the historical [[existence]] of such a [[person]] is often criticized. In sources deriving from the [[Sthaviravāda]] branch, he is taken to be the founder of the [[Mahāsāṃghikas]], and the figure who [[caused]] the split between the two branches.  According to this account, some 35 years after the [[Second Buddhist Council]] at {{Wiki|Pāṭaliputra}}, there was another meeting over five points allegedly held by a figure named [[Mahādeva]].  These five points were [[essentially]] regarding [[doctrines]] of the fallibility and imperfection of [[arhats]], which were opposed by some.  In this account, the majority ([[Mahāsaṃgha]]) sided with [[Mahādeva]], and the minority ([[Sthaviras]]) were opposed to it, thus causing a split in the [[Saṃgha]].  
 
[[File:Taishizou-wood-nara.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Taishizou-wood-nara.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
However, scholars have generally agreed that the matter of dispute was a matter of [[vinaya]] instead.  In the earliest account, the council was convened at {{Wiki|Pāṭaliputra}} over matters of [[vinaya]], and it is explained that the schism resulted from the majority ([[Mahāsaṃgha]]) refusing to accept the addition of rules to the [[Vinaya]] by the minority ([[Sthaviras]]).  This account is bolstered by the [[vinaya]] texts themselves, as [[vinayas]] associated with the [[Sthaviras]] do contain more rules than those of the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Vinaya]].  For example, the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Prātimokṣa]] has 67 rules in the śaikṣa-[[dharma]] section, while the [[Theravāda]] version has 75 rules.  Modern {{Wiki|scholarship}} is generally in agreement that the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Vinaya]] is the oldest.  Joseph Walser concludes that this [[Mahādeva]] was most likely a literary figure.  
+
However, [[scholars]] have generally agreed that the {{Wiki|matter}} of dispute was a {{Wiki|matter}} of [[vinaya]] instead.  In the earliest account, the council was convened at {{Wiki|Pāṭaliputra}} over matters of [[vinaya]], and it is explained that the [[schism]] resulted from the majority ([[Mahāsaṃgha]]) refusing to accept the addition of rules to the [[Vinaya]] by the minority ([[Sthaviras]]).  This account is bolstered by the [[vinaya]] texts themselves, as [[vinayas]] associated with the [[Sthaviras]] do contain more rules than those of the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Vinaya]].  For example, the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Prātimokṣa]] has 67 rules in the [[śaikṣa]]-[[dharma]] section, while the [[Theravāda]] version has 75 rules.  {{Wiki|Modern}} {{Wiki|scholarship}} is generally in agreement that the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] [[Vinaya]] is the oldest.  Joseph Walser concludes that this [[Mahādeva]] was most likely a {{Wiki|literary}} figure.  
 
As founder of the {{Wiki|Caitika}} schools
 
As founder of the {{Wiki|Caitika}} schools
  
The Samayabhedoparacanacakra records that [[Mahādeva]] was a completely different figure who was the founder of the {{Wiki|Caitika}} sect over 100 years later. A number of {{Wiki|scholars}} have concluded that an association of "[[Mahādeva]]" with the first schism was a later sectarian interpolation.  Jan Nattier and Charles Prebish state that [[Mahādeva]] was the later founder of the {{Wiki|Caitikas}}, stating, "[[Mahādeva]] has nothing to do with the primary schism between the [[Mahāsāṃghikas]] and [[Sthaviras]], emerging in a historical period considerably later than previously supposed, and taking his place in the sectarian movement by instigating an internal schism within the already existing [[Mahāsāṃghika]] school."  
+
The [[Samayabhedoparacanacakra]] records that [[Mahādeva]] was a completely different figure who was the founder of the {{Wiki|Caitika}} [[sect]] over 100 years later. A number of {{Wiki|scholars}} have concluded that an association of "[[Mahādeva]]" with the first [[schism]] was a later {{Wiki|sectarian}} interpolation.  Jan Nattier and Charles Prebish state that [[Mahādeva]] was the later founder of the {{Wiki|Caitikas}}, stating, "[[Mahādeva]] has nothing to do with the primary [[schism]] between the [[Mahāsāṃghikas]] and [[Sthaviras]], [[emerging]] in a historical period considerably later than previously supposed, and taking his place in the {{Wiki|sectarian}} {{Wiki|movement}} by instigating an internal [[schism]] within the already [[existing]] [[Mahāsāṃghika]] school."  
Legends about evil deeds
+
{{Wiki|Legends}} about [[evil]] [[deeds]]
  
Numerous legends about [[Mahādeva]] exist, all of which refer to the figure who supposedly caused the first schism in the [[Buddhist]] [[saṃgha]].
+
Numerous {{Wiki|legends}} about [[Mahādeva]] [[exist]], all of which refer to the figure who supposedly [[caused]] the first [[schism]] in the [[Buddhist]] [[saṃgha]].
  
He was ordained at {{Wiki|Kukkutarama}} in {{Wiki|Pataliputra}}, before taking the head of the [[sangha]]. The story of his transformation from a sinner of the worst kind to a learned monk was among the collection of tales relating to [[Buddhism]], taken back to {{Wiki|China}} by [[Xuanzang]]. The story of his transformation is titled as "The sins of Mahadeva". His father was a wealthy and ambitious trader who had married at a very young age. He often went away to foreign lands to trade and amass wealth. It is said that [[Mahadeva]] had a very pleasant and radiant face. But he was unfortunate not to get the love of his father during his childhood. In his teens he committed his first sin, by indulging in an incestuous relationship with his mother. [[Mahadeva]] was frightened of his father coming to know about this relationship and hence murdered him, thereby committing his second cardinal sin. He then, in order to escape from the guilt ran away with his mother to a distant land and started life fresh. But there, one day he ran into an old neighbour who was on a tour to the land that [[Mahadeva]] had made his new home. The man was treated as a guest and was given refuge for a few days in [[Mahadeva]]'s house. After a few days the guest started asking questions about [[Mahadeva]]'s sudden disappearance from his native land. [[Mahadeva]] felt threatened and poisoned the guest, thereby committing his third cardinal sin. Some years later he began to doubt his mother, for whom he had committed all the murders. When he found that his mother was involved in a relationship with another man, [[Mahadeva]] felt emotionally wrecked and out of his frustration he murdered his mother thereby committing the fourth cardinal sin of his life. After this incident [[Mahadeva]] found his life meaningless and teetered on the brink of insanity. He, in fact was about to take his own life when he came to know that a [[Buddhist]] [[monk]] with a panacea for sinners had arrived in the town. [[Mahadeva]] decided to give his wretched life one more chance and approached the monk who was camping near {{Wiki|Pataliputra}}. It was at this place that [[Mahadeva]] was ordained as member of the [[Buddhist]] [[sangha]].
+
He was [[ordained]] at {{Wiki|Kukkutarama}} in {{Wiki|Pataliputra}}, before taking the head of the [[sangha]]. The story of his [[transformation]] from a sinner of the worst kind to a learned [[monk]] was among the collection of tales relating to [[Buddhism]], taken back to {{Wiki|China}} by [[Xuanzang]]. The story of his [[transformation]] is titled as "The [[sins]] of [[Mahadeva]]". His father was a wealthy and ambitious trader who had [[married]] at a very young age. He often went away to foreign lands to trade and amass [[wealth]]. It is said that [[Mahadeva]] had a very [[pleasant]] and radiant face. But he was unfortunate not to get the [[love]] of his father during his childhood. In his teens he committed his first [[sin]], by indulging in an [[incestuous]] relationship with his mother. [[Mahadeva]] was frightened of his father coming to know about this relationship and hence murdered him, thereby committing his second cardinal [[sin]]. He then, in order to escape from the [[guilt]] ran away with his mother to a distant land and started [[life]] fresh. But there, one day he ran into an old neighbour who was on a tour to the land that [[Mahadeva]] had made his new [[home]]. The man was treated as a guest and was given [[refuge]] for a few days in [[Mahadeva]]'s house. After a few days the guest started asking questions about [[Mahadeva]]'s sudden [[disappearance]] from his native land. [[Mahadeva]] felt threatened and poisoned the guest, thereby committing his third cardinal [[sin]]. Some years later he began to [[doubt]] his mother, for whom he had committed all the murders. When he found that his mother was involved in a relationship with another man, [[Mahadeva]] felt [[emotionally]] wrecked and out of his [[frustration]] he murdered his mother thereby committing the fourth cardinal [[sin]] of his [[life]]. After this incident [[Mahadeva]] found his [[life]] meaningless and teetered on the brink of [[insanity]]. He, in fact was about to take his own [[life]] when he came to know that a [[Buddhist]] [[monk]] with a panacea for sinners had arrived in the town. [[Mahadeva]] decided to give his wretched [[life]] one more chance and approached the [[monk]] who was camping near {{Wiki|Pataliputra}}. It was at this place that [[Mahadeva]] was [[ordained]] as member of the [[Buddhist]] [[sangha]].
 
</poem>
 
</poem>
 
{{W}}
 
{{W}}
 
[[Category:History of Buddhism]]
 
[[Category:History of Buddhism]]

Revision as of 12:12, 25 August 2014

Shuayan.jpg

Mahādeva (Sanskrit: महादेव; Chinese: 大天; pinyin: Dàtiān) is a controversial figure who appears in various roles in the histories of the early Buddhist schools.

Various roles and existence
As the cause of the first schism

Various sources present Mahādeva as playing different roles, and the historical existence of such a person is often criticized. In sources deriving from the Sthaviravāda branch, he is taken to be the founder of the Mahāsāṃghikas, and the figure who caused the split between the two branches. According to this account, some 35 years after the Second Buddhist Council at Pāṭaliputra, there was another meeting over five points allegedly held by a figure named Mahādeva. These five points were essentially regarding doctrines of the fallibility and imperfection of arhats, which were opposed by some. In this account, the majority (Mahāsaṃgha) sided with Mahādeva, and the minority (Sthaviras) were opposed to it, thus causing a split in the Saṃgha.

Taishizou-wood-nara.jpg

However, scholars have generally agreed that the matter of dispute was a matter of vinaya instead. In the earliest account, the council was convened at Pāṭaliputra over matters of vinaya, and it is explained that the schism resulted from the majority (Mahāsaṃgha) refusing to accept the addition of rules to the Vinaya by the minority (Sthaviras). This account is bolstered by the vinaya texts themselves, as vinayas associated with the Sthaviras do contain more rules than those of the Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya. For example, the Mahāsāṃghika Prātimokṣa has 67 rules in the śaikṣa-dharma section, while the Theravāda version has 75 rules. Modern scholarship is generally in agreement that the Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya is the oldest. Joseph Walser concludes that this Mahādeva was most likely a literary figure.
As founder of the Caitika schools

The Samayabhedoparacanacakra records that Mahādeva was a completely different figure who was the founder of the Caitika sect over 100 years later. A number of scholars have concluded that an association of "Mahādeva" with the first schism was a later sectarian interpolation. Jan Nattier and Charles Prebish state that Mahādeva was the later founder of the Caitikas, stating, "Mahādeva has nothing to do with the primary schism between the Mahāsāṃghikas and Sthaviras, emerging in a historical period considerably later than previously supposed, and taking his place in the sectarian movement by instigating an internal schism within the already existing Mahāsāṃghika school."
Legends about evil deeds

Numerous legends about Mahādeva exist, all of which refer to the figure who supposedly caused the first schism in the Buddhist saṃgha.

He was ordained at Kukkutarama in Pataliputra, before taking the head of the sangha. The story of his transformation from a sinner of the worst kind to a learned monk was among the collection of tales relating to Buddhism, taken back to China by Xuanzang. The story of his transformation is titled as "The sins of Mahadeva". His father was a wealthy and ambitious trader who had married at a very young age. He often went away to foreign lands to trade and amass wealth. It is said that Mahadeva had a very pleasant and radiant face. But he was unfortunate not to get the love of his father during his childhood. In his teens he committed his first sin, by indulging in an incestuous relationship with his mother. Mahadeva was frightened of his father coming to know about this relationship and hence murdered him, thereby committing his second cardinal sin. He then, in order to escape from the guilt ran away with his mother to a distant land and started life fresh. But there, one day he ran into an old neighbour who was on a tour to the land that Mahadeva had made his new home. The man was treated as a guest and was given refuge for a few days in Mahadeva's house. After a few days the guest started asking questions about Mahadeva's sudden disappearance from his native land. Mahadeva felt threatened and poisoned the guest, thereby committing his third cardinal sin. Some years later he began to doubt his mother, for whom he had committed all the murders. When he found that his mother was involved in a relationship with another man, Mahadeva felt emotionally wrecked and out of his frustration he murdered his mother thereby committing the fourth cardinal sin of his life. After this incident Mahadeva found his life meaningless and teetered on the brink of insanity. He, in fact was about to take his own life when he came to know that a Buddhist monk with a panacea for sinners had arrived in the town. Mahadeva decided to give his wretched life one more chance and approached the monk who was camping near Pataliputra. It was at this place that Mahadeva was ordained as member of the Buddhist sangha.

Source

Wikipedia:Mahādeva