Difference between revisions of "Syllogism"
(Created page with "thumb|250px| <poem> 1. Logic A form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion; for example, All humans are m...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:00x2400.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:00x2400.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | 1. Logic A form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion; for example, All humans are mortal, the major premise, I am a human, the minor premise, therefore, I am mortal, the conclusion. | + | 1. [[Logic]] A [[form]] of {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|reasoning}} consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion; for example, All [[humans]] are {{Wiki|mortal}}, the major premise, I am a [[human]], the minor premise, therefore, I am {{Wiki|mortal}}, the conclusion. |
− | 2. Reasoning from the general to the specific; deduction. | + | 2. {{Wiki|Reasoning}} from the general to the specific; deduction. |
− | 3. A subtle or specious piece of reasoning. | + | 3. A {{Wiki|subtle}} or specious piece of {{Wiki|reasoning}}. |
− | 1. ([[Philosophy]] / [[Logic]]) a deductive inference consisting of two premises and a conclusion, all of which are categorial propositions. The subject of the conclusion is the minor term and its predicate the major term; the middle term occurs in both premises but not the conclusion. There are 256 such arguments but only 24 are valid. Some men are mortal; some men are angelic; so some mortals are angelic is invalid, while some temples are in ruins; all ruins are fascinating; so some temples are fascinating is valid. Here fascinating, in ruins, and temples are respectively major, middle, and minor terms | + | 1. ([[Philosophy]] / [[Logic]]) a {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|inference}} consisting of two premises and a conclusion, all of which are categorial propositions. The [[subject]] of the conclusion is the minor term and its predicate the major term; the middle term occurs in both premises but not the conclusion. There are 256 such arguments but only 24 are valid. Some men are {{Wiki|mortal}}; some men are angelic; so some {{Wiki|mortals}} are angelic is invalid, while some [[temples]] are in ruins; all ruins are fascinating; so some [[temples]] are fascinating is valid. Here fascinating, in ruins, and [[temples]] are respectively major, middle, and minor terms |
− | 2. (Philosophy / Logic) a deductive inference of certain other forms with two premises, such as the hypothetical syllogism, if P then Q; if Q then R; so if P then R | + | 2. ([[Philosophy]] / [[Logic]]) a {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|inference}} of certain other [[forms]] with two premises, such as the {{Wiki|hypothetical}} [[syllogism]], if P then Q; if Q then R; so if P then R |
− | 3. (Philosophy / Logic) a piece of deductive reasoning from the general to the particular | + | 3. ([[Philosophy]] / [[Logic]]) a piece of {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|reasoning}} from the general to the particular |
− | 4. (Philosophy / Logic) a subtle or deceptive piece of reasoning | + | 4. ([[Philosophy]] / [[Logic]]) a {{Wiki|subtle}} or deceptive piece of {{Wiki|reasoning}} |
− | [via Latin from Greek sullogismos, from sullogizesthai to reckon together, from sul- syn- + logizesthai to calculate, from logos a discourse | + | [via {{Wiki|Latin}} from {{Wiki|Greek}} sullogismos, from sullogizesthai to reckon together, from sul- syn- + logizesthai to calculate, from {{Wiki|logos}} a [[discourse]] |
− | 1. an argument of a form containing a major premise and a minor premise connected with a middle term and a conclusion, as “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.” | + | 1. an argument of a [[form]] containing a major premise and a minor premise connected with a middle term and a conclusion, as “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.” |
− | 2. deductive reasoning. | + | 2. {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|reasoning}}. |
− | 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. | + | 3. an extremely {{Wiki|subtle}}, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. |
− | [1350–1400; Middle English silogime < Old French < Latin [[syllogismus]] < Greek syllogismós=syllog- (see syllogize) + -ismos -ism] | + | [1350–1400; {{Wiki|Middle English}} silogime < Old French < Latin [[syllogismus]] < Greek syllogismós=syllog- (see syllogize) + -ismos -ism] |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{R}} | {{R}} | ||
[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/syllogism www.thefreedictionary.com] | [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/syllogism www.thefreedictionary.com] | ||
[[Category:Bhavyaviveka]] | [[Category:Bhavyaviveka]] |
Latest revision as of 14:07, 2 September 2014
1. Logic A form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion; for example, All humans are mortal, the major premise, I am a human, the minor premise, therefore, I am mortal, the conclusion.
2. Reasoning from the general to the specific; deduction.
3. A subtle or specious piece of reasoning.
1. (Philosophy / Logic) a deductive inference consisting of two premises and a conclusion, all of which are categorial propositions. The subject of the conclusion is the minor term and its predicate the major term; the middle term occurs in both premises but not the conclusion. There are 256 such arguments but only 24 are valid. Some men are mortal; some men are angelic; so some mortals are angelic is invalid, while some temples are in ruins; all ruins are fascinating; so some temples are fascinating is valid. Here fascinating, in ruins, and temples are respectively major, middle, and minor terms
2. (Philosophy / Logic) a deductive inference of certain other forms with two premises, such as the hypothetical syllogism, if P then Q; if Q then R; so if P then R
3. (Philosophy / Logic) a piece of deductive reasoning from the general to the particular
4. (Philosophy / Logic) a subtle or deceptive piece of reasoning
[via Latin from Greek sullogismos, from sullogizesthai to reckon together, from sul- syn- + logizesthai to calculate, from logos a discourse
1. an argument of a form containing a major premise and a minor premise connected with a middle term and a conclusion, as “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”
2. deductive reasoning.
3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument.
[1350–1400; Middle English silogime < Old French < Latin syllogismus < Greek syllogismós=syllog- (see syllogize) + -ismos -ism]