Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Manual of Abhidharma - Reading Three: Types of Deeds, and the Nature of Motivation"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|250px| 69 Abbreviated List of Rights and Wrongs '''A very gross abbreviation of them '''All was stated as the ten paths of '''Action, whether vi...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
'''A very gross abbreviation of them
 
'''A very gross abbreviation of them
  
'''All was stated as the ten paths of
+
'''All was stated as the ten [[paths]] of
  
'''Action, whether virtuous or not.
+
'''[[Action]], whether [[virtuous]] or not.
  
 
[IV.262-4]
 
[IV.262-4]
Line 14: Line 14:
 
   
 
   
  
A very gross abbreviation of all of them—of all right and wrong activities—was stated as the ten paths of action, whether we are talking about the ten virtuous types or the ten types which are not virtuous.
+
A very gross abbreviation of all of them—of all right and wrong activities—was stated as the ten [[paths]] of [[action]], whether we are talking about the ten [[virtuous]] types or the ten types which are not [[virtuous]].
  
One may ask just what is not included in such an abbreviation. Certain steps of a particular act, say that of taking life, are not included. These would be the steps known as “undertaking” or “conclusion.” Neither have we included any but the most serious forms of action in speech; mental movement as an element in deeds of the thought has been omitted too.
+
One may ask just what is not included in such an abbreviation. Certain steps of a particular act, say that of taking [[life]], are not included. These would be the steps known as “{{Wiki|undertaking}}” or “conclusion.” Neither have we included any but the most serious [[forms]] of [[action]] in {{Wiki|speech}}; [[mental]] {{Wiki|movement}} as an [[element]] in [[deeds]] of the [[thought]] has been omitted too.
  
As for virtues, the above abbreviation again leaves out the “undertaking” and “conclusion” steps for actions of the body. Examples of virtue in one’s speech, such as speaking sweetly, are omitted—as is mental movement in deeds of the thought.
+
As for [[virtues]], the above abbreviation again leaves out the “{{Wiki|undertaking}}” and “conclusion” steps for [[actions]] of the [[body]]. Examples of [[virtue]] in one’s {{Wiki|speech}}, such as {{Wiki|speaking}} sweetly, are omitted—as is [[mental]] {{Wiki|movement}} in [[deeds]] of the [[thought]].
  
Our more detailed treatment of what we call a “path of action” includes seven different parts:
+
Our more detailed treatment of what we call a “[[path]] of [[action]]” includes seven different parts:
  
1) the relative certainty of whether a given action includes types of form that either do or do not communicate one’s intentions;
+
1) the [[relative]] {{Wiki|certainty}} of whether a given [[action]] includes types of [[form]] that either do or do not {{Wiki|communicate}} one’s {{Wiki|intentions}};
  
2) the division of each of the paths of action into three different types;
+
2) the [[division]] of each of the [[paths]] of [[action]] into three different types;
  
3) the details of non-virtuous paths of action;
+
3) the details of [[non-virtuous]] [[paths]] of [[action]];
  
4) the ways in which one loses, and then regains, his most basic virtues;
+
4) the ways in which one loses, and then regains, his most basic [[virtues]];
  
5) how many paths of action can occur together with movement of the mind;
+
5) how many [[paths]] of [[action]] can occur together with {{Wiki|movement}} of the [[mind]];
  
6) what paths of action are found in which realms, and among what types of beings; and
+
6) what [[paths]] of [[action]] are found in which [[realms]], and among what types of [[beings]]; and
  
7) the results of the paths of action.
+
7) the results of the [[paths]] of [[action]].
  
 
*********
 
*********
Line 42: Line 42:
 
11
 
11
  
Virtue and the Other Types
+
[[Virtue]] and the Other Types
  
 
'''…Freedom
 
'''…Freedom
  
'''Is the ultimate virtue. The roots as well as
+
'''Is the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[virtue]]. The [[roots]] as well as
  
'''Shame and a conscience are so in themselves.
+
'''[[Shame]] and a {{Wiki|conscience}} are so in themselves.
  
'''Those that are linked with them, by a mental link;
+
'''Those that are linked with them, by a [[mental]] link;
  
'''Actions and the like, by motivation.
+
'''[[Actions]] and the like, by [[motivation]].
  
'''Their opposites, non-virtue. The ultimate
+
'''Their opposites, [[non-virtue]]. The [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]]
  
'''In the ethically neutral, those described.
+
'''In the [[ethically]] [[neutral]], those described.
  
 
[IV.30b-6]
 
[IV.30b-6]
Line 62: Line 62:
 
   
 
   
  
One may ask whether virtue and the rest are established only on the basis of the motivation involved. They are not; in fact, there are four different divisions, beginning with what we call “ultimate” virtue. How do we describe them?
+
One may ask whether [[virtue]] and the rest are established only on the basis of the [[motivation]] involved. They are not; in fact, there are four different divisions, beginning with what we call “[[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]]” [[virtue]]. How do we describe them?
  
 
   
 
   
  
First consider freedom—nirvana. It is the ultimate virtue, for it is the highest state of happiness, free of every single suffering. It’s like a totally healthy person. Next consider the three roots of virtue, as well as a sense of shame and a conscience. They are virtue by nature, for they are virtue in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like medicinal herbs.
+
First consider freedom—nirvana. It is the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[virtue]], for it is the [[highest]] state of [[happiness]], free of every single [[suffering]]. It’s like a totally healthy [[person]]. Next consider the three [[roots]] of [[virtue]], as well as a [[sense of shame]] and a {{Wiki|conscience}}. They are [[virtue]] by [[nature]], for they are [[virtue]] in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like {{Wiki|medicinal}} herbs.
  
Still further let us take those instances of mind and mental functions that are joined in a mental link with them—with these virtues. They are “mental-link” virtue, for we establish them as virtue by the fact that they share a mental link with virtue. They are, for example, like the liquid in which you mix your medicinal herbs.
+
Still further let us take those instances of [[mind]] and {{Wiki|mental functions}} that are joined in a [[mental]] link with them—with these [[virtues]]. They are “mental-link” [[virtue]], for we establish them as [[virtue]] by the fact that they share a [[mental]] link with [[virtue]]. They are, for example, like the liquid in which you mix your {{Wiki|medicinal}} herbs.
  
Next consider physical and verbal actions and the like—the things that are motivated by the mental elements just described. They are what we call “motivational” virtue, for they are considered virtue by reason of the virtuous motivation involved with them. We can compare them to the milk that a mother produces after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the medicinal herbs described.
+
Next consider [[physical]] and [[verbal]] [[actions]] and the like—the things that are motivated by the [[mental]] [[elements]] just described. They are what we call “motivational” [[virtue]], for they are considered [[virtue]] by [[reason]] of the [[virtuous]] [[motivation]] involved with them. We can compare them to the milk that a mother produces after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the {{Wiki|medicinal}} herbs described.
  
The opposites of each of the above are what we call “non-virtue”; the process is as follows. First take the cycle of life. It is the ultimate non-virtue, for it is the highest form of unhappiness—total bondage in suffering. It is like an illness.
+
The opposites of each of the above are what we call “[[non-virtue]]”; the process is as follows. First take the cycle of [[life]]. It is the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[non-virtue]], for it is the [[highest form]] of unhappiness—total bondage in [[suffering]]. It is like an {{Wiki|illness}}.
  
Next consider the three root non-virtues, as well as shamelessness and the lack of a conscience. They are non-virtue by nature, for they are non-virtue in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like poisonous herbs.
+
Next consider the [[three root]] [[non-virtues]], as well as [[shamelessness]] and the lack of a {{Wiki|conscience}}. They are [[non-virtue]] by [[nature]], for they are [[non-virtue]] in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like {{Wiki|poisonous}} herbs.
  
Then consider instances of mind and mental functions which share a mental link with these non-virtues. They are “mental-link” non-virtue, for we establish them as non-virtue because they share a mental link with non-virtue. These we can compare to a liquid in which the poisonous herbs were mixed.
+
Then consider instances of [[mind]] and {{Wiki|mental functions}} which share a [[mental]] link with these [[non-virtues]]. They are “mental-link” [[non-virtue]], for we establish them as [[non-virtue]] because they share a [[mental]] link with [[non-virtue]]. These we can compare to a liquid in which the {{Wiki|poisonous}} herbs were mixed.
  
Let’s next take the deeds of body and speech motivated by the mental elements described. These are “motivational” non-virtue, for we establish them as nonvirtue through the non-virtuous motivation involved. These types resemble the milk that a mother gives after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the poisonous herbs.
+
Let’s next take the [[deeds]] of [[body]] and {{Wiki|speech}} motivated by the [[mental]] [[elements]] described. These are “motivational” [[non-virtue]], for we establish them as [[nonvirtue]] through the [[non-virtuous]] [[motivation]] involved. These types resemble the milk that a mother gives after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the {{Wiki|poisonous}} herbs.
  
The ultimate in the things which are ethically neutral consist of those instances we have described previously: non-analytic cessations and unproduced space. We turn next to a description of motivation.
+
The [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] in the things which are [[ethically]] [[neutral]] consist of those instances we have described previously: non-analytic cessations and unproduced [[space]]. We turn next to a description of [[motivation]].
  
 
[[File:Gold.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Gold.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
Line 86: Line 86:
 
12
 
12
  
The Nature of Motivation
+
The [[Nature]] of [[Motivation]]
  
'''Two types of motivation: causal and
+
'''Two types of [[motivation]]: causal and
  
'''The one we give the name of “at the time.”
+
'''The one we give the [[name]] of “at the time.”
  
 
'''The first of the two acts to set you off;
 
'''The first of the two acts to set you off;
Line 96: Line 96:
 
'''The second’s function is to make you continue.
 
'''The second’s function is to make you continue.
  
'''The consciousness eliminated by seeing
+
'''The [[consciousness]] eliminated by [[seeing]]
  
'''Is the one which starts. The thought for both
+
'''Is the one which starts. The [[thought]] for both
  
 
'''Eliminated by habituation.
 
'''Eliminated by habituation.
Line 110: Line 110:
 
One may begin as follows:
 
One may begin as follows:
  
You have stated above that the communicating type of form can never be motivated by something which is eliminated by the path of seeing. Sutra though explains that mistaken views lead to mistaken thoughts, mistaken speech, and mistaken activity. Isn’t there a contradiction here?
+
You have stated above that the communicating type of [[form]] can never be motivated by something which is eliminated by the [[path of seeing]]. [[Sutra]] though explains that mistaken [[views]] lead to mistaken [[thoughts]], mistaken {{Wiki|speech}}, and mistaken [[activity]]. Isn’t there a {{Wiki|contradiction}} here?
  
There is not. In general, all motivation may be divided into two types: the motivation had during the causal stages of a deed and the one we give the name of “motivation at the time.” The first of the two acts to set you off: this is where you say before any particular action, “I’m going to do this or that.” The second’s function is to make you continue on: this is where you say to yourself after you’ve already started, “Now I’ll do this act.”
+
There is not. In general, all [[motivation]] may be divided into two types: the [[motivation]] had during the causal stages of a [[deed]] and the one we give the [[name]] of “[[motivation]] at the time.” The first of the two acts to set you off: this is where you say before any particular [[action]], “I’m going to do this or that.” The second’s function is to make you continue on: this is where you say to yourself after you’ve already started, “Now I’ll do this act.”
  
Now among these two, the consciousness eliminated by the path of seeing is the first, the one which starts you off on an action. This is the one that the sutra was referring to; when we made our statement, we were talking about how it couldn’t be the motivation during the time of the action.
+
Now among these two, the [[consciousness]] eliminated by the [[path of seeing]] is the first, the one which starts you off on an [[action]]. This is the one that the [[sutra]] was referring to; when we made our statement, we were talking about how it couldn’t be the [[motivation]] during the time of the [[action]].
  
The thought for both kinds of motivation includes types that are eliminated by the path of habituation, for it involves conceptions and is directed outwards. The five sense consciousnesses function only in continuation of a deed, for they are types of awareness that do not involve conception but which are directed outwards.
+
The [[thought]] for both kinds of [[motivation]] includes types that are eliminated by the [[path]] of habituation, for it involves conceptions and is directed outwards. The [[five sense]] [[consciousnesses]] function only in continuation of a [[deed]], for they are types of [[awareness]] that do not involve {{Wiki|conception}} but which are directed outwards.
  
We continue now with certain relevant features of motivation.
+
We continue now with certain relevant features of [[motivation]].
 
[[File:Img5.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Img5.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
   
 
   
Line 124: Line 124:
 
13
 
13
  
Certain Features of Motivation
+
Certain Features of [[Motivation]]
  
'''From starting types of virtue and the rest,
+
'''From starting types of [[virtue]] and the rest,
  
 
'''Come three types of continuation as well.
 
'''Come three types of continuation as well.
  
'''For the Able the same, or that one virtue.
+
'''For the Able the same, or that one [[virtue]].
  
 
'''Those that come from ripening are neither.
 
'''Those that come from ripening are neither.
Line 138: Line 138:
 
   
 
   
  
One may ask whether it is assured that starting types of motivation that are virtuous or whatever will lead to continuing types of motivation that are also virtuous or such. From each of the starting types, from those of virtue and the rest, come all three types of continuation as well—whether it be virtue, non-virtue, or the ethically neutral.
+
One may ask whether it is assured that starting types of [[motivation]] that are [[virtuous]] or whatever will lead to continuing types of [[motivation]] that are also [[virtuous]] or such. From each of the starting types, from those of [[virtue]] and the rest, come all three types of continuation as well—whether it be [[virtue]], [[non-virtue]], or the [[ethically]] [[neutral]].
  
For the Able Ones they are the same: starting types of motivation which have a virtuous nature lead to continuing types that are also virtue, and starting motivations of an ethically neutral character lead to continuing motivations that are neutral too. Or their starting motivations that are ethically neutral can lead to continuing motivations that are virtue. With the Able Ones though you can never have a continuing motivation which is ethically neutral coming from a starting motivation of virtue, for these beings’ motivation never digresses.
+
For the Able Ones they are the same: starting types of [[motivation]] which have a [[virtuous]] [[nature]] lead to continuing types that are also [[virtue]], and starting motivations of an [[ethically]] [[neutral]] [[character]] lead to continuing motivations that are [[neutral]] too. Or their starting motivations that are [[ethically]] [[neutral]] can lead to continuing motivations that are [[virtue]]. With the Able Ones though you can never have a continuing [[motivation]] which is [[ethically]] [[neutral]] coming from a starting [[motivation]] of [[virtue]], for these [[beings]]’ [[motivation]] never digresses.
  
The Able Ones are never in any state of mind other than that of balanced meditation. They therefore possess no ethically neutral states of mind. For support we have the verse from sutra that says,
+
The Able Ones are never in any [[state of mind]] other than that of balanced [[meditation]]. They therefore possess no [[ethically]] [[neutral]] [[states of mind]]. For support we have the verse from [[sutra]] that says,
  
 
   
 
   
  
Even as he goes, the elephant meditates.
+
Even as he goes, the [[elephant]] [[meditates]].
  
Even as he rises, the elephant meditates.
+
Even as he rises, the [[elephant]] [[meditates]].
  
Even as he sleeps, the elephant meditates.
+
Even as he sleeps, the [[elephant]] [[meditates]].
  
Even as he stays, the elephant meditates.
+
Even as he stays, the [[elephant]] [[meditates]].
  
In reply to this assertion the Detailists make a claim of their own:
+
In reply to this [[assertion]] the Detailists make a claim of their own:
  
This is no proof that they can never have any state of mind that is not one of balanced meditation. The quotation is only referring to the way the Ones Thus Gone think as they act in any of the four different ways: when they are going somewhere, they conceive of themselves as going somewhere, and so on.
+
This is no [[proof]] that they can never have any [[state of mind]] that is not one of balanced [[meditation]]. The quotation is only referring to the way the Ones [[Thus Gone]] think as they act in any of the four different ways: when they are going somewhere, they [[conceive]] of themselves as going somewhere, and so on.
  
Those things that come about from a ripening of past deeds are neither the starting type of motivation or the continuing type. This is because their appearance does not rely on any particular application of effort—they just come out on their own.
+
Those things that come about from a ripening of {{Wiki|past}} [[deeds]] are neither the starting type of [[motivation]] or the continuing type. This is because their [[appearance]] does not rely on any particular application of effort—they just come out on their own.
  
This completes our discussion of the typical features of the three types of deeds in general. We move on now to the different divisions of non-communicating types of deeds, beginning with a brief summary and continuing to a more detailed treatment.
+
This completes our [[discussion]] of the typical features of the three types of [[deeds]] in general. We move on now to the different divisions of non-communicating types of [[deeds]], beginning with a brief summary and continuing to a more detailed treatment.
  
As for the first, non-communicating form can be understood as having three different types. These are vows, anti-vows, and those other than these two.
+
As for the first, non-communicating [[form]] can be understood as having three different types. These are [[vows]], anti-vows, and those other than these two.
  
 
*********
 
*********
  
The Treasure House of Chim [Chim Jampey Yang's commentary to the Abhidharmakosha] states:
+
The [[Treasure]] House of Chim [Chim Jampey Yang's commentary to the [[Abhidharmakosha]]] states:
  
Sutra describes three kinds of karma: virtuous karma, non-virtuous karma, and neutral karma. Virtue is that karma which, in the short term, brings you a karmic ripening which is desirable (that is, a feeling of pleasure), and ultimately protects you from suffering (that is, helps you achieve nirvana). Non-virtue is that karma which brings you a karmic ripening which is undesirable (that is, a feeling of pain). A neutral deed, something neither virtuous nor non-virtuous, is that karma which brings you something which is neither desirable nor undesirable.
+
[[Sutra]] describes three kinds of [[karma]]: [[virtuous]] [[karma]], [[non-virtuous]] [[karma]], and [[neutral karma]]. [[Virtue]] is that [[karma]] which, in the short term, brings you a [[karmic]] ripening which is desirable (that is, a [[feeling]] of [[pleasure]]), and ultimately protects you from [[suffering]] (that is, helps you achieve [[nirvana]]). [[Non-virtue]] is that [[karma]] which brings you a [[karmic]] ripening which is undesirable (that is, a [[feeling]] of [[pain]]). A [[neutral]] [[deed]], something neither [[virtuous]] nor [[non-virtuous]], is that [[karma]] which brings you something which is neither desirable nor undesirable.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 09:55, 31 December 2014

Budgfj4.jpg

69

Abbreviated List of Rights and Wrongs

A very gross abbreviation of them

All was stated as the ten paths of

Action, whether virtuous or not.

[IV.262-4]


A very gross abbreviation of all of them—of all right and wrong activities—was stated as the ten paths of action, whether we are talking about the ten virtuous types or the ten types which are not virtuous.

One may ask just what is not included in such an abbreviation. Certain steps of a particular act, say that of taking life, are not included. These would be the steps known as “undertaking” or “conclusion.” Neither have we included any but the most serious forms of action in speech; mental movement as an element in deeds of the thought has been omitted too.

As for virtues, the above abbreviation again leaves out the “undertaking” and “conclusion” steps for actions of the body. Examples of virtue in one’s speech, such as speaking sweetly, are omitted—as is mental movement in deeds of the thought.

Our more detailed treatment of what we call a “path of action” includes seven different parts:

1) the relative certainty of whether a given action includes types of form that either do or do not communicate one’s intentions;

2) the division of each of the paths of action into three different types;

3) the details of non-virtuous paths of action;

4) the ways in which one loses, and then regains, his most basic virtues;

5) how many paths of action can occur together with movement of the mind;

6) what paths of action are found in which realms, and among what types of beings; and

7) the results of the paths of action.


11

Virtue and the Other Types

…Freedom

Is the ultimate virtue. The roots as well as

Shame and a conscience are so in themselves.

Those that are linked with them, by a mental link;

Actions and the like, by motivation.

Their opposites, non-virtue. The ultimate

In the ethically neutral, those described.

[IV.30b-6]

Es.jpg


One may ask whether virtue and the rest are established only on the basis of the motivation involved. They are not; in fact, there are four different divisions, beginning with what we call “ultimatevirtue. How do we describe them?


First consider freedom—nirvana. It is the ultimate virtue, for it is the highest state of happiness, free of every single suffering. It’s like a totally healthy person. Next consider the three roots of virtue, as well as a sense of shame and a conscience. They are virtue by nature, for they are virtue in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like medicinal herbs.

Still further let us take those instances of mind and mental functions that are joined in a mental link with them—with these virtues. They are “mental-link” virtue, for we establish them as virtue by the fact that they share a mental link with virtue. They are, for example, like the liquid in which you mix your medicinal herbs.

Next consider physical and verbal actions and the like—the things that are motivated by the mental elements just described. They are what we call “motivational” virtue, for they are considered virtue by reason of the virtuous motivation involved with them. We can compare them to the milk that a mother produces after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the medicinal herbs described.

The opposites of each of the above are what we call “non-virtue”; the process is as follows. First take the cycle of life. It is the ultimate non-virtue, for it is the highest form of unhappiness—total bondage in suffering. It is like an illness.

Next consider the three root non-virtues, as well as shamelessness and the lack of a conscience. They are non-virtue by nature, for they are non-virtue in and of themselves, without relying on anything else. They are like poisonous herbs.

Then consider instances of mind and mental functions which share a mental link with these non-virtues. They are “mental-link” non-virtue, for we establish them as non-virtue because they share a mental link with non-virtue. These we can compare to a liquid in which the poisonous herbs were mixed.

Let’s next take the deeds of body and speech motivated by the mental elements described. These are “motivational” non-virtue, for we establish them as nonvirtue through the non-virtuous motivation involved. These types resemble the milk that a mother gives after she has drunk the liquid mixed with the poisonous herbs.

The ultimate in the things which are ethically neutral consist of those instances we have described previously: non-analytic cessations and unproduced space. We turn next to a description of motivation.

Gold.jpg

12

The Nature of Motivation

Two types of motivation: causal and

The one we give the name of “at the time.”

The first of the two acts to set you off;

The second’s function is to make you continue.

The consciousness eliminated by seeing

Is the one which starts. The thought for both

Eliminated by habituation.

The five function in continuation.

[IV.37-44]


One may begin as follows:

You have stated above that the communicating type of form can never be motivated by something which is eliminated by the path of seeing. Sutra though explains that mistaken views lead to mistaken thoughts, mistaken speech, and mistaken activity. Isn’t there a contradiction here?

There is not. In general, all motivation may be divided into two types: the motivation had during the causal stages of a deed and the one we give the name of “motivation at the time.” The first of the two acts to set you off: this is where you say before any particular action, “I’m going to do this or that.” The second’s function is to make you continue on: this is where you say to yourself after you’ve already started, “Now I’ll do this act.”

Now among these two, the consciousness eliminated by the path of seeing is the first, the one which starts you off on an action. This is the one that the sutra was referring to; when we made our statement, we were talking about how it couldn’t be the motivation during the time of the action.

The thought for both kinds of motivation includes types that are eliminated by the path of habituation, for it involves conceptions and is directed outwards. The five sense consciousnesses function only in continuation of a deed, for they are types of awareness that do not involve conception but which are directed outwards.

We continue now with certain relevant features of motivation.

Img5.jpg


13

Certain Features of Motivation

From starting types of virtue and the rest,

Come three types of continuation as well.

For the Able the same, or that one virtue.

Those that come from ripening are neither.

[IV.45-8]


One may ask whether it is assured that starting types of motivation that are virtuous or whatever will lead to continuing types of motivation that are also virtuous or such. From each of the starting types, from those of virtue and the rest, come all three types of continuation as well—whether it be virtue, non-virtue, or the ethically neutral.

For the Able Ones they are the same: starting types of motivation which have a virtuous nature lead to continuing types that are also virtue, and starting motivations of an ethically neutral character lead to continuing motivations that are neutral too. Or their starting motivations that are ethically neutral can lead to continuing motivations that are virtue. With the Able Ones though you can never have a continuing motivation which is ethically neutral coming from a starting motivation of virtue, for these beingsmotivation never digresses.

The Able Ones are never in any state of mind other than that of balanced meditation. They therefore possess no ethically neutral states of mind. For support we have the verse from sutra that says,


Even as he goes, the elephant meditates.

Even as he rises, the elephant meditates.

Even as he sleeps, the elephant meditates.

Even as he stays, the elephant meditates.

In reply to this assertion the Detailists make a claim of their own:

This is no proof that they can never have any state of mind that is not one of balanced meditation. The quotation is only referring to the way the Ones Thus Gone think as they act in any of the four different ways: when they are going somewhere, they conceive of themselves as going somewhere, and so on.

Those things that come about from a ripening of past deeds are neither the starting type of motivation or the continuing type. This is because their appearance does not rely on any particular application of effort—they just come out on their own.

This completes our discussion of the typical features of the three types of deeds in general. We move on now to the different divisions of non-communicating types of deeds, beginning with a brief summary and continuing to a more detailed treatment.

As for the first, non-communicating form can be understood as having three different types. These are vows, anti-vows, and those other than these two.

The Treasure House of Chim [Chim Jampey Yang's commentary to the Abhidharmakosha] states:

Sutra describes three kinds of karma: virtuous karma, non-virtuous karma, and neutral karma. Virtue is that karma which, in the short term, brings you a karmic ripening which is desirable (that is, a feeling of pleasure), and ultimately protects you from suffering (that is, helps you achieve nirvana). Non-virtue is that karma which brings you a karmic ripening which is undesirable (that is, a feeling of pain). A neutral deed, something neither virtuous nor non-virtuous, is that karma which brings you something which is neither desirable nor undesirable.

See also

Source

jetsongkapa.wordpress.com