Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Debate"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
[[Debate]]  is a method of interactive and representational argument. [[Debate]]  is a broader [[form]]  of argument than {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|reasoning}}, which only examines whether a conclusion is a consequence of premises, and {{Wiki|factual}} argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case, or [[rhetoric]] , which is a technique of {{Wiki|persuasion}}. Though [[logical]] [[consistency]] , {{Wiki|factual}} accuracy and some [[degree]] of [[emotional]]  appeal to the audience are important [[elements]] of the [[art]] of {{Wiki|persuasion}}, in [[debating]] , one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a {{Wiki|superior}} "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more {{Wiki|subtle}} and strategic. The outcome of a [[debate]]  depends upon consensus or some formal way of reaching a resolution, rather than the [[objective]] facts as such. In a formal [[debating]]  contest, there are {{Wiki|rules}} for participants to discuss and decide on differences, within a framework defining how they will interact.
 
[[Debate]]  is a method of interactive and representational argument. [[Debate]]  is a broader [[form]]  of argument than {{Wiki|deductive}} {{Wiki|reasoning}}, which only examines whether a conclusion is a consequence of premises, and {{Wiki|factual}} argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case, or [[rhetoric]] , which is a technique of {{Wiki|persuasion}}. Though [[logical]] [[consistency]] , {{Wiki|factual}} accuracy and some [[degree]] of [[emotional]]  appeal to the audience are important [[elements]] of the [[art]] of {{Wiki|persuasion}}, in [[debating]] , one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a {{Wiki|superior}} "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more {{Wiki|subtle}} and strategic. The outcome of a [[debate]]  depends upon consensus or some formal way of reaching a resolution, rather than the [[objective]] facts as such. In a formal [[debating]]  contest, there are {{Wiki|rules}} for participants to discuss and decide on differences, within a framework defining how they will interact.
  
[[Debating]]  is commonly carried out in many assemblies of various types to discuss matters and to make resolutions about [[action]] to be taken, often by a vote. Deliberative [[bodies]]  such as parliaments, legislative assemblies, and meetings of all sorts engage in [[debates]] . In particular, in parliamentary democracies a legislature [[debates]]  and decides on new laws. Formal [[debates]]  between candidates for elected office, such as the leaders [[debates]]  and the U.S. presidential election [[debates]] , are sometimes held in democracies. [[Debating]]  is also carried out for educational and recreational purposes, usually associated with educational establishments. The major goal of the study of [[debate]]  as a method or [[art]] is to develop the ability to [[debate]]  {{Wiki|rationally}} from either position with {{Wiki|equal}} ease.
+
[[Debating]]  is commonly carried out in many assemblies of various types to discuss matters and to make resolutions about [[action]] to be taken, often by a vote. Deliberative [[bodies]]  such as parliaments, legislative assemblies, and meetings of all sorts engage in [[debates]] . In particular, in parliamentary democracies a legislature [[debates]]  and decides on new laws. Formal [[debates]]  between candidates for elected office, such as the leaders [[debates]]  and the [[U.S.]] presidential election [[debates]] , are sometimes held in democracies. [[Debating]]  is also carried out for educational and recreational purposes, usually associated with educational establishments. The major goal of the study of [[debate]]  as a method or [[art]] is to develop the ability to [[debate]]  {{Wiki|rationally}} from either position with {{Wiki|equal}} ease.
  
 
Although informal [[debate]]  is common the quality and depth of a [[debate]]  improves with [[knowledge]]  and skill of its participants as [[debaters]] . The outcome of a contest may be decided by audience vote, by judges, or by some combination of the two.
 
Although informal [[debate]]  is common the quality and depth of a [[debate]]  improves with [[knowledge]]  and skill of its participants as [[debaters]] . The outcome of a contest may be decided by audience vote, by judges, or by some combination of the two.
Line 29: Line 29:
 
[[Category:Pramāṇa]]
 
[[Category:Pramāṇa]]
 
[[Category:Tibetan Monastic Education]]
 
[[Category:Tibetan Monastic Education]]
 +
[[Category:Debate]]

Revision as of 21:15, 20 February 2015

Debate50 r.jpg

Debate (Tib. རྩོད་པ་; Wyl. rtsod pa) is considered to be one of the three principal fields of activity for a scholar.[1] It is practised in all traditions of Tibetan Buddhism, although the Gelugpa school in particular emphasizes the role of debate as a the most important of all educational tools, and this has led to their preeminence in the field.[2]

==History==
Buddhist history is replete with tales of encounters between scholars of rival schools or traditions meeting in debate to settle their differences, often with miraculous results. Chandrakirti famously debated with Chandragomin in Nalanda for several years before realizing that the lay master was secretly receiving help each night from Avalokiteshvara. The practice of public debates continued in Tibet and the biographies of many of the greatest masters in Tibetan history, including the likes of Sakya Pandita and Longchen Rabjam never fail to mention their debating prowess. The Great Prayer Festival, inaugurated by Jé Tsongkhapa in 1409 and held in Lhasa every year until 1959, saw candidates for a geshe degree debate before representatives of the 'three great seats' of Sera, Drepung and Ganden as part of their final examination. In the late nineteenth century, Mipham Rinpoche was involved in a public debate with Japa Dongak while Patrul Rinpoche acted as the adjudicator.

==Format==
The two parties in a debate are known as the challenger or questioner (dam bca' ba) and the defender (rigs lam pa).

==Notes==

  1. 'chad rtsod rtsom gsum, exposition, debate and composition
  2. See Dreyfus (2003), passim.


==Further Reading==


Debate is contention in argument; dispute, controversy; discussion ; especially the discussion of questions of public interest in Parliament or in any assembly.

Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument. Debate is a broader form of argument than deductive reasoning, which only examines whether a conclusion is a consequence of premises, and factual argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case, or rhetoric , which is a technique of persuasion. Though logical consistency , factual accuracy and some degree of emotional appeal to the audience are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating , one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a superior "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more subtle and strategic. The outcome of a debate depends upon consensus or some formal way of reaching a resolution, rather than the objective facts as such. In a formal debating contest, there are rules for participants to discuss and decide on differences, within a framework defining how they will interact.

Debating is commonly carried out in many assemblies of various types to discuss matters and to make resolutions about action to be taken, often by a vote. Deliberative bodies such as parliaments, legislative assemblies, and meetings of all sorts engage in debates . In particular, in parliamentary democracies a legislature debates and decides on new laws. Formal debates between candidates for elected office, such as the leaders debates and the U.S. presidential election debates , are sometimes held in democracies. Debating is also carried out for educational and recreational purposes, usually associated with educational establishments. The major goal of the study of debate as a method or art is to develop the ability to debate rationally from either position with equal ease.

Although informal debate is common the quality and depth of a debate improves with knowledge and skill of its participants as debaters . The outcome of a contest may be decided by audience vote, by judges, or by some combination of the two.

Source

Wikipedia:Debate