Difference between revisions of "Cosmos"
m (1 revision: Robo text replace 30 sept) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:58471 n.jpeg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:58471 n.jpeg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | In the general [[sense]], a [[cosmos]] is an orderly or harmonious system. The [[word]] derives from the {{Wiki|Greek}} term [[κόσμος]] ([[kosmos]]), literally meaning "[[order]]" or "ornament" and metaphorically "[[world]]", and is antithetical to the {{Wiki|concept}} of {{Wiki|chaos}}. Today, the [[word]] is generally used as a synonym of the Latin loanword "[[Universe]]" (considered in its orderly aspect). The [[word]] cosmetics originates from the same [[root]]. In many Slavic languages such as Russian, Bulgarian, and Serbian, the [[word]] Космос ([[cosmos]]) also means "outer [[space]]". In Mandarin {{Wiki|Chinese}}, [[cosmos]] and [[universe]] are both translated as [[宇宙]] ([[yǔzhòu]]), which literally translated means {{Wiki|space-time}} (宇 yǔ, "[[space]]" and 宙 zhòu "[[time]]") | + | In the general [[sense]], a [[cosmos]] is an orderly or harmonious system. The [[word]] derives from the {{Wiki|Greek}} term [[κόσμος]] ([[kosmos]]), literally meaning "[[order]]" or "ornament" and {{Wiki|metaphorically}} "[[world]]", and is [[Wikipedia:Anti-life|antithetical]] to the {{Wiki|concept}} of {{Wiki|chaos}}. Today, the [[word]] is generally used as a {{Wiki|synonym}} of the {{Wiki|Latin}} loanword "[[Universe]]" (considered in its orderly aspect). The [[word]] [[cosmetics]] originates from the same [[root]]. In many Slavic [[languages]] such as {{Wiki|Russian}}, Bulgarian, and Serbian, the [[word]] Космос ([[cosmos]]) also means "outer [[space]]". In [[Wikipedia:Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]] {{Wiki|Chinese}}, [[cosmos]] and [[universe]] are both translated as [[宇宙]] ([[yǔzhòu]]), which literally translated means {{Wiki|space-time}} (宇 yǔ, "[[space]]" and 宙 zhòu "[[time]]") |
[[Philosophy]] | [[Philosophy]] | ||
− | {{Wiki|Pythagoras}} is said to have been the first [[philosopher]] to apply the term [[cosmos]] to the [[Universe]], perhaps referring to the starry firmament. | + | {{Wiki|Pythagoras}} is said to have been the first [[philosopher]] to apply the term [[cosmos]] to the [[Universe]], perhaps referring to the starry {{Wiki|firmament}}. |
− | Russian cosmism is a cosmocentric [[philosophical]] and cultural movement that emerged in {{Wiki|Russia}} in the early 20th century. | + | {{Wiki|Russian}} cosmism is a cosmocentric [[philosophical]] and {{Wiki|cultural}} {{Wiki|movement}} that emerged in {{Wiki|Russia}} in the early 20th century. |
− | Cosmicism is a [[philosophical]] position that mankind is an insignificant aspect of a [[universe]] that is at best indifferent and perhaps even hostile. This [[philosophy]], explored by writers such as H.P. Lovecraft (who some say is the original proponent of the [[philosophy]]) and later writers, is seen in [[books]] such as Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. | + | Cosmicism is a [[philosophical]] position that mankind is an insignificant aspect of a [[universe]] that is at best indifferent and perhaps even {{Wiki|hostile}}. This [[philosophy]], explored by writers such as H.P. Lovecraft (who some say is the original proponent of the [[philosophy]]) and later writers, is seen in [[books]] such as Hitchhiker's Guide to the {{Wiki|Galaxy}}. |
Integral [[philosophy]] | Integral [[philosophy]] | ||
[[File:60968.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:60968.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | The [[philosopher]] Ken Wilber uses the term [[kosmos]] to refer to all of [[manifest]] [[existence]], including various [[realms]] of [[consciousness]]. The term [[kosmos]] so used distinguishes a [[nondual]] [[Universe]] (which, in his [[view]], includes both noetic and [[physical]] aspects) from the strictly [[physical]] [[Universe]] that is the [[concern]] of the [[traditional]] sciences. Wilber's nephew, Cosmo Iacavazzi, is said to have been named after the [[scientific]] term. | + | The [[philosopher]] Ken Wilber uses the term [[kosmos]] to refer to all of [[manifest]] [[existence]], including various [[realms]] of [[consciousness]]. The term [[kosmos]] so used distinguishes a [[nondual]] [[Universe]] (which, in his [[view]], includes both noetic and [[physical]] aspects) from the strictly [[physical]] [[Universe]] that is the [[concern]] of the [[traditional]] {{Wiki|sciences}}. Wilber's nephew, Cosmo Iacavazzi, is said to have been named after the [[scientific]] term. |
− | {{Wiki|Ancient Greek}} conception of the [[cosmos]] | + | {{Wiki|Ancient Greek}} {{Wiki|conception}} of the [[cosmos]] |
− | The {{Wiki|Ancient Greek}} natural [[philosopher]] Archimedes, in his essay "The Sand Reckoner", estimated the diameter of the [[cosmos]] to be equivalent in stadia to what we call two [[light]] years. | + | The {{Wiki|Ancient Greek}} natural [[philosopher]] [[Archimedes]], in his essay "The Sand Reckoner", estimated the {{Wiki|diameter}} of the [[cosmos]] to be {{Wiki|equivalent}} in stadia to what we call two [[light]] years. |
− | Theology | + | {{Wiki|Theology}} |
See also: [[Religious]] [[cosmology]] | See also: [[Religious]] [[cosmology]] | ||
In {{Wiki|theology}}, the term can be used to denote the created [[Universe]], not including the [[creator]]. In {{Wiki|Christian}} {{Wiki|theology}}, the [[word]] is also used synonymously with aion to refer to "[[worldly]] [[life]]" or "this [[world]]" as opposed to the [[afterlife]] or [[World]] to Come. | In {{Wiki|theology}}, the term can be used to denote the created [[Universe]], not including the [[creator]]. In {{Wiki|Christian}} {{Wiki|theology}}, the [[word]] is also used synonymously with aion to refer to "[[worldly]] [[life]]" or "this [[world]]" as opposed to the [[afterlife]] or [[World]] to Come. | ||
− | The [[cosmos]] as originated by {{Wiki|Pythagoras}} is parallel to the Zoroastrian term aša, the {{Wiki|concept}} of a [[divine]] [[order]], or divinely ordered creation. | + | The [[cosmos]] as originated by {{Wiki|Pythagoras}} is parallel to the {{Wiki|Zoroastrian}} term aša, the {{Wiki|concept}} of a [[divine]] [[order]], or divinely ordered creation. |
− | [[Science]] fiction about the [[cosmos]] | + | [[Science]] {{Wiki|fiction}} about the [[cosmos]] |
[[File:870 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:870 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | Olaf Stapledon, in his [[science]] fiction novel Star Maker (1937), describes how [[God]] (the Star Maker) evolves by creating ever more complex [[cosmos]]es across multicosmic hypertime. | + | Olaf Stapledon, in his [[science]] {{Wiki|fiction}} {{Wiki|novel}} [[Star]] Maker (1937), describes how [[God]] (the [[Star]] Maker) evolves by creating ever more complex [[cosmos]]es across multicosmic hypertime. |
− | Isaac Asimov, in his [[science]] fiction story The Last Question (1955), examines the question of how a new [[cosmos]] could be formed after the present [[cosmos]] has degenerated into heat [[death]] due to {{Wiki|entropy}}. | + | Isaac Asimov, in his [[science]] {{Wiki|fiction}} story The Last Question (1955), examines the question of how a new [[cosmos]] could be formed after the {{Wiki|present}} [[cosmos]] has degenerated into heat [[death]] due to {{Wiki|entropy}}. |
[[Cosmology]] | [[Cosmology]] | ||
− | [[Cosmology]] is the study of the [[cosmos]] in several of the above meanings, depending on context. All cosmologies have in common an attempt to understand the implicit [[order]] within the whole of [[being]]. In this way, most [[religions]] and [[philosophical]] systems have a [[cosmology]]. | + | [[Cosmology]] is the study of the [[cosmos]] in several of the above meanings, depending on context. All {{Wiki|cosmologies}} have in common an attempt to understand the implicit [[order]] within the whole of [[being]]. In this way, most [[religions]] and [[philosophical]] systems have a [[cosmology]]. |
− | In [[physical]] [[cosmology]], the term [[cosmos]] is often used in a technical way, referring to a particular {{Wiki|spacetime}} {{Wiki|continuum}} within the (postulated) multiverse. Our particular [[cosmos]] is generally capitalized as the [[Cosmos]]. | + | In [[physical]] [[cosmology]], the term [[cosmos]] is often used in a technical way, referring to a particular {{Wiki|spacetime}} {{Wiki|continuum}} within the (postulated) {{Wiki|multiverse}}. Our particular [[cosmos]] is generally capitalized as the [[Cosmos]]. |
Age and size of the [[cosmos]] | Age and size of the [[cosmos]] | ||
[[File:895072 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:895072 n.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | According to current [[scientific]] {{Wiki|theory}}, the [[cosmos]] began 13.81 billion years ago (short scale) in the Big Bang. The current diameter of the observable [[cosmos]] is [[thought]] to be about 93 billion [[light]] years. | + | According to current [[scientific]] {{Wiki|theory}}, the [[cosmos]] began 13.81 billion years ago (short scale) in the [[Big Bang]]. The current {{Wiki|diameter}} of the observable [[cosmos]] is [[thought]] to be about 93 billion [[light]] years. |
− | The diameter of the entire [[cosmos]] is unknown. However, according to Alan Guth's inflation {{Wiki|theory}}, the actual size of the [[cosmos]] is at least fifteen orders of magnitude larger than the observable [[universe]]. This means that, if the inflation {{Wiki|theory}} is correct, the 93 billion [[light]] year diameter of the observable [[universe]] is approximately as much smaller than the diameter of the entire [[universe]] as the diameter of a helium {{Wiki|atom}} is compared to the diameter of the {{Wiki|Sun}}. This is equivalent to a minimum diameter of the entire [[cosmos]] of 1026 [[light]] years (100 septillion [[light]] years short scale). | + | The {{Wiki|diameter}} of the entire [[cosmos]] is unknown. However, according to Alan Guth's inflation {{Wiki|theory}}, the actual size of the [[cosmos]] is at least fifteen orders of magnitude larger than the observable [[universe]]. This means that, if the inflation {{Wiki|theory}} is correct, the 93 billion [[light]] year {{Wiki|diameter}} of the observable [[universe]] is approximately as much smaller than the {{Wiki|diameter}} of the entire [[universe]] as the {{Wiki|diameter}} of a helium {{Wiki|atom}} is compared to the {{Wiki|diameter}} of the {{Wiki|Sun}}. This is {{Wiki|equivalent}} to a minimum {{Wiki|diameter}} of the entire [[cosmos]] of 1026 [[light]] years (100 septillion [[light]] years short scale). |
− | Nature of the [[cosmos]] | + | [[Nature]] of the [[cosmos]] |
[[Space]] | [[Space]] | ||
− | [[Space]] is a fabric that can bend or twist and is the fabric of the [[cosmos]]. With [[time]], it [[forms]] a four-dimensional fabric. The fact that the speed of light—the [[space]] traveled by [[light]] per second—is the same for everyone whether moving or not suggests that {{Wiki|space-time}} adjusts itself in a way that [[light]] seems to travel at the same speed no matter what. | + | [[Space]] is a fabric that can bend or twist and is the fabric of the [[cosmos]]. With [[time]], it [[forms]] a four-dimensional fabric. The fact that the {{Wiki|speed}} of light—the [[space]] traveled by [[light]] per second—is the same for everyone whether moving or not suggests that {{Wiki|space-time}} adjusts itself in a way that [[light]] seems to travel at the same {{Wiki|speed}} no {{Wiki|matter}} what. |
[[File:A15402.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:A15402.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | [[Space]] is a flexible fabric that contains the galaxies made of stars and {{Wiki|planets}} as heavy [[objects]]. Their weight bends the fabric of {{Wiki|space-time}} which creates a curvature that makes it possible for lighter [[objects]] to go around heavier [[objects]], as is the case for planet [[Earth]] and the lighter weight {{Wiki|moon}}, and also for the {{Wiki|planets}} orbiting the {{Wiki|sun}} in our {{Wiki|solar system}}. This [[phenomenon]] is known as gravity which is one of the four forces of the [[cosmos]]. | + | [[Space]] is a flexible fabric that contains the {{Wiki|galaxies}} made of {{Wiki|stars}} and {{Wiki|planets}} as heavy [[objects]]. Their {{Wiki|weight}} bends the fabric of {{Wiki|space-time}} which creates a curvature that makes it possible for lighter [[objects]] to go around heavier [[objects]], as is the case for {{Wiki|planet}} [[Earth]] and the lighter {{Wiki|weight}} {{Wiki|moon}}, and also for the {{Wiki|planets}} orbiting the {{Wiki|sun}} in our {{Wiki|solar system}}. This [[phenomenon]] is known as {{Wiki|gravity}} which is one of the [[four forces]] of the [[cosmos]]. |
[[Time]] | [[Time]] | ||
− | Since {{Wiki|space and time}} are unified, the motion through [[space]] impacts [[time]]: [[time]] slows down for the [[person]] who is moving but goes faster for the one who stands still. This implies that the passage of [[time]] as we [[experience]] it may be just an [[illusion]]. In that case, every moment in [[time]] from the beginning until far in the future coexists together, but in a different region of the [[cosmos]]. That leads to the {{Wiki|concept}} of [[time]] travel. Because {{Wiki|space and time}} are a unified [[physical]] entity, it is possible that there are some shortcuts in the fabric of [[space]] [[time]] that can lead us to another period of [[time]] different from our present [[time]]. Despite the possibility of [[time]] travel, there is no proof that we can change the past or even the future. This is because the different periods of [[time]] coexist and have a fixed state. Still, the exact nature of [[time]] is not fully understood. | + | Since {{Wiki|space and time}} are unified, the {{Wiki|motion}} through [[space]] impacts [[time]]: [[time]] slows down for the [[person]] who is moving but goes faster for the one who stands still. This implies that the passage of [[time]] as we [[experience]] it may be just an [[illusion]]. In that case, every [[moment]] in [[time]] from the beginning until far in the {{Wiki|future}} coexists together, but in a different region of the [[cosmos]]. That leads to the {{Wiki|concept}} of [[time]] travel. Because {{Wiki|space and time}} are a unified [[physical]] [[entity]], it is possible that there are some shortcuts in the fabric of [[space]] [[time]] that can lead us to another period of [[time]] different from our {{Wiki|present}} [[time]]. Despite the possibility of [[time]] travel, there is no [[proof]] that we can change the {{Wiki|past}} or even the {{Wiki|future}}. This is because the different periods of [[time]] coexist and have a fixed [[state]]. Still, the exact [[nature]] of [[time]] is not fully understood. |
Forces of the [[cosmos]] | Forces of the [[cosmos]] | ||
− | General relativity: {{Wiki|Einstein}}'s {{Wiki|theory}} of gravity, which [[causes]] the curvature of {{Wiki|space and time}} | + | General [[relativity]]: {{Wiki|Einstein}}'s {{Wiki|theory}} of {{Wiki|gravity}}, which [[causes]] the curvature of {{Wiki|space and time}} |
− | Electromagnetic force: One of nature's forces that acts on particles that have electric charge | + | {{Wiki|Electromagnetic}} force: One of nature's forces that acts on {{Wiki|particles}} that have electric charge |
− | Strong nuclear force: Force of nature that influences quarks by [[holding]] quarks together inside {{Wiki|protons}} and {{Wiki|neutrons}} | + | Strong nuclear force: Force of [[nature]] that [[influences]] quarks by [[holding]] quarks together inside {{Wiki|protons}} and {{Wiki|neutrons}} |
− | Weak nuclear force: Force of nature that acts on subatomic scales and is responsible for [[phenomena]] such as radioactive [[decay]] | + | Weak nuclear force: Force of [[nature]] that acts on subatomic scales and is responsible for [[phenomena]] such as radioactive [[decay]] |
− | The last three forces [[exist]] at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, which is the [[atomic]] scale. The problem for {{Wiki|physicists}} is that gravity acts at the astronomic level, and the other three forces act at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, causing {{Wiki|atoms}} to behave differently than expected by general relativity. With gravity, the nature of the [[cosmos]] is very predictable and ordered. However, at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, {{Wiki|particle}} [[energy]] and position are unpredictable. For {{Wiki|physicists}}, it is hard to fit [[order]] into the chaos that is happening at [[atomic]] level. At the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, gravitational force may be explained by the presence of a {{Wiki|particle}} named graviton. According to this explanation, a graviton is a {{Wiki|particle}} of [[energy]] released by the effect of gravity on the fabric of {{Wiki|space-time}}. However, no experiment has yet proven the [[existence]] of such a {{Wiki|particle}}. At the surface [[space]] is flexible and ordered, but at {{Wiki|quantum}} level it is active, unpredictable, and multidimensional. | + | The last three forces [[exist]] at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, which is the [[atomic]] scale. The problem for {{Wiki|physicists}} is that {{Wiki|gravity}} acts at the astronomic level, and the other three forces act at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, causing {{Wiki|atoms}} to behave differently than expected by general [[relativity]]. With {{Wiki|gravity}}, the [[nature]] of the [[cosmos]] is very predictable and ordered. However, at the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, {{Wiki|particle}} [[energy]] and position are unpredictable. For {{Wiki|physicists}}, it is hard to fit [[order]] into the {{Wiki|chaos}} that is happening at [[atomic]] level. At the {{Wiki|quantum}} level, gravitational force may be explained by the presence of a {{Wiki|particle}} named graviton. According to this explanation, a graviton is a {{Wiki|particle}} of [[energy]] released by the effect of {{Wiki|gravity}} on the fabric of {{Wiki|space-time}}. However, no experiment has yet proven the [[existence]] of such a {{Wiki|particle}}. At the surface [[space]] is flexible and ordered, but at {{Wiki|quantum}} level it is active, unpredictable, and multidimensional. |
Quest for unification | Quest for unification | ||
− | The goal is to combine all the laws in {{Wiki|physics}} into one that can explain the whole [[cosmos]] from the outer [[space]] down to the {{Wiki|quantum}} scale. Today, there is a popular {{Wiki|theory}} named String {{Wiki|theory}} that provides a possible explanation of the fundamental nature of the [[Cosmos]]. | + | The goal is to combine all the laws in {{Wiki|physics}} into one that can explain the whole [[cosmos]] from the outer [[space]] down to the {{Wiki|quantum}} scale. Today, there is a popular {{Wiki|theory}} named String {{Wiki|theory}} that provides a possible explanation of the fundamental [[nature]] of the [[Cosmos]]. |
− | Superstring {{Wiki|theory}}, or string {{Wiki|theory}}, says that fundamental ingredients are one-dimensional loops (closed strings) or snippets (open strings) of vibrating [[energy]], which unites general relativity and {{Wiki|quantum mechanics}}. | + | Superstring {{Wiki|theory}}, or string {{Wiki|theory}}, says that fundamental ingredients are one-dimensional loops (closed strings) or snippets (open strings) of vibrating [[energy]], which unites general [[relativity]] and {{Wiki|quantum mechanics}}. |
− | The fact that the particles behave like waves suggests that they are made of strands shaped like string at the most fundamental level. The [[shape]] of the [[energy]] strand determines what is a proton and what is a neutron. In other words, different shapes produce different particles. At present, string {{Wiki|theory}} is not considered a {{Wiki|theory}} in the [[scientific]] [[sense]] because no [[scientific]] experiments either support or disprove it. (For the different uses of the term, see {{Wiki|Theory}}.) | + | The fact that the {{Wiki|particles}} behave like waves suggests that they are made of [[strands]] shaped like string at the most fundamental level. The [[shape]] of the [[energy]] strand determines what is a {{Wiki|proton}} and what is a {{Wiki|neutron}}. In other words, different shapes produce different {{Wiki|particles}}. At {{Wiki|present}}, string {{Wiki|theory}} is not considered a {{Wiki|theory}} in the [[scientific]] [[sense]] because no [[scientific]] experiments either support or disprove it. (For the different uses of the term, see {{Wiki|Theory}}.) |
− | [[Cosmos]] definition | + | [[Cosmos]] [[definition]] |
− | Taking the nature of the [[cosmos]] into [[consideration]], [[cosmos]] can be defined as the ordered system of all that [[exists]] from outer [[space]] down to the [[atomic]] scale. | + | Taking the [[nature]] of the [[cosmos]] into [[consideration]], [[cosmos]] can be defined as the ordered system of all that [[exists]] from outer [[space]] down to the [[atomic]] scale. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{W}} | {{W}} | ||
[[Category:Buddhist Cosmology]] | [[Category:Buddhist Cosmology]] |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 15 September 2015
In the general sense, a cosmos is an orderly or harmonious system. The word derives from the Greek term κόσμος (kosmos), literally meaning "order" or "ornament" and metaphorically "world", and is antithetical to the concept of chaos. Today, the word is generally used as a synonym of the Latin loanword "Universe" (considered in its orderly aspect). The word cosmetics originates from the same root. In many Slavic languages such as Russian, Bulgarian, and Serbian, the word Космос (cosmos) also means "outer space". In Mandarin Chinese, cosmos and universe are both translated as 宇宙 (yǔzhòu), which literally translated means space-time (宇 yǔ, "space" and 宙 zhòu "time")
Philosophy
Pythagoras is said to have been the first philosopher to apply the term cosmos to the Universe, perhaps referring to the starry firmament.
Russian cosmism is a cosmocentric philosophical and cultural movement that emerged in Russia in the early 20th century.
Cosmicism is a philosophical position that mankind is an insignificant aspect of a universe that is at best indifferent and perhaps even hostile. This philosophy, explored by writers such as H.P. Lovecraft (who some say is the original proponent of the philosophy) and later writers, is seen in books such as Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
Integral philosophy
The philosopher Ken Wilber uses the term kosmos to refer to all of manifest existence, including various realms of consciousness. The term kosmos so used distinguishes a nondual Universe (which, in his view, includes both noetic and physical aspects) from the strictly physical Universe that is the concern of the traditional sciences. Wilber's nephew, Cosmo Iacavazzi, is said to have been named after the scientific term.
Ancient Greek conception of the cosmos
The Ancient Greek natural philosopher Archimedes, in his essay "The Sand Reckoner", estimated the diameter of the cosmos to be equivalent in stadia to what we call two light years.
Theology
See also: Religious cosmology
In theology, the term can be used to denote the created Universe, not including the creator. In Christian theology, the word is also used synonymously with aion to refer to "worldly life" or "this world" as opposed to the afterlife or World to Come.
The cosmos as originated by Pythagoras is parallel to the Zoroastrian term aša, the concept of a divine order, or divinely ordered creation.
Science fiction about the cosmos
Olaf Stapledon, in his science fiction novel Star Maker (1937), describes how God (the Star Maker) evolves by creating ever more complex cosmoses across multicosmic hypertime.
Isaac Asimov, in his science fiction story The Last Question (1955), examines the question of how a new cosmos could be formed after the present cosmos has degenerated into heat death due to entropy.
Cosmology
Cosmology is the study of the cosmos in several of the above meanings, depending on context. All cosmologies have in common an attempt to understand the implicit order within the whole of being. In this way, most religions and philosophical systems have a cosmology.
In physical cosmology, the term cosmos is often used in a technical way, referring to a particular spacetime continuum within the (postulated) multiverse. Our particular cosmos is generally capitalized as the Cosmos.
Age and size of the cosmos
According to current scientific theory, the cosmos began 13.81 billion years ago (short scale) in the Big Bang. The current diameter of the observable cosmos is thought to be about 93 billion light years.
The diameter of the entire cosmos is unknown. However, according to Alan Guth's inflation theory, the actual size of the cosmos is at least fifteen orders of magnitude larger than the observable universe. This means that, if the inflation theory is correct, the 93 billion light year diameter of the observable universe is approximately as much smaller than the diameter of the entire universe as the diameter of a helium atom is compared to the diameter of the Sun. This is equivalent to a minimum diameter of the entire cosmos of 1026 light years (100 septillion light years short scale).
Nature of the cosmos
Space
Space is a fabric that can bend or twist and is the fabric of the cosmos. With time, it forms a four-dimensional fabric. The fact that the speed of light—the space traveled by light per second—is the same for everyone whether moving or not suggests that space-time adjusts itself in a way that light seems to travel at the same speed no matter what.
Space is a flexible fabric that contains the galaxies made of stars and planets as heavy objects. Their weight bends the fabric of space-time which creates a curvature that makes it possible for lighter objects to go around heavier objects, as is the case for planet Earth and the lighter weight moon, and also for the planets orbiting the sun in our solar system. This phenomenon is known as gravity which is one of the four forces of the cosmos.
Time
Since space and time are unified, the motion through space impacts time: time slows down for the person who is moving but goes faster for the one who stands still. This implies that the passage of time as we experience it may be just an illusion. In that case, every moment in time from the beginning until far in the future coexists together, but in a different region of the cosmos. That leads to the concept of time travel. Because space and time are a unified physical entity, it is possible that there are some shortcuts in the fabric of space time that can lead us to another period of time different from our present time. Despite the possibility of time travel, there is no proof that we can change the past or even the future. This is because the different periods of time coexist and have a fixed state. Still, the exact nature of time is not fully understood.
Forces of the cosmos
General relativity: Einstein's theory of gravity, which causes the curvature of space and time
Electromagnetic force: One of nature's forces that acts on particles that have electric charge
Strong nuclear force: Force of nature that influences quarks by holding quarks together inside protons and neutrons
Weak nuclear force: Force of nature that acts on subatomic scales and is responsible for phenomena such as radioactive decay
The last three forces exist at the quantum level, which is the atomic scale. The problem for physicists is that gravity acts at the astronomic level, and the other three forces act at the quantum level, causing atoms to behave differently than expected by general relativity. With gravity, the nature of the cosmos is very predictable and ordered. However, at the quantum level, particle energy and position are unpredictable. For physicists, it is hard to fit order into the chaos that is happening at atomic level. At the quantum level, gravitational force may be explained by the presence of a particle named graviton. According to this explanation, a graviton is a particle of energy released by the effect of gravity on the fabric of space-time. However, no experiment has yet proven the existence of such a particle. At the surface space is flexible and ordered, but at quantum level it is active, unpredictable, and multidimensional.
Quest for unification
The goal is to combine all the laws in physics into one that can explain the whole cosmos from the outer space down to the quantum scale. Today, there is a popular theory named String theory that provides a possible explanation of the fundamental nature of the Cosmos.
Superstring theory, or string theory, says that fundamental ingredients are one-dimensional loops (closed strings) or snippets (open strings) of vibrating energy, which unites general relativity and quantum mechanics.
The fact that the particles behave like waves suggests that they are made of strands shaped like string at the most fundamental level. The shape of the energy strand determines what is a proton and what is a neutron. In other words, different shapes produce different particles. At present, string theory is not considered a theory in the scientific sense because no scientific experiments either support or disprove it. (For the different uses of the term, see Theory.)
Cosmos definition
Taking the nature of the cosmos into consideration, cosmos can be defined as the ordered system of all that exists from outer space down to the atomic scale.