Difference between revisions of "An Introduction to the "Mantra Śãstra""
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
− | An Introduction to the "Mantra Sastra" | + | An Introduction to the "[[Mantra]] [[Sastra]]" |
by: S.E. Gopalacharlu | by: S.E. Gopalacharlu | ||
− | A paper read by the author before the Annual Convention of the Theosophical Society, held at Adyar, Madras, on 27th. 28th and 29th December, 1891. | + | A paper read by the author before the Annual Convention of the [[Theosophical Society]], held at [[Adyar]], [[Madras]], on 27th. 28th and 29th December, 1891. |
Published in 1934 | Published in 1934 | ||
− | Theosophical Publishing House, Adyar, Chennai [Madras] India | + | [[Theosophical]] Publishing House, [[Adyar]], [[Chennai]] [[[Madras]]] [[India]] |
− | The Theosophist Office, Adyar, Madras. India | + | The [[Theosophist]] Office, [[Adyar]], [[Madras]]. [[India]] |
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
− | [Page iii] MANTRA SASTRA is another department of Occult Science, which has for its objects all kinds of Siddhis or acquirements of powers for securing the objects aimed at by means of invoking the gods presiding them by repeating such Mantras or formulas as are intended for the purpose with the necessary ceremonies attending thereto. The whole of the four Vedas consist of nothing but Mantras, and as they proceed from the Pranava (the word Aum), the Pranava, consequently Adi or Mula Mantra or the Mantra of all Mantras; and it is acceptable to both the followers of Nigamas (the Vedas) and Agamas (the Tantras). For this reason no Mantra can become effective or powerful without uttering the Pranava in the commencement of it. | + | [Page iii] [[MANTRA]] SASTRA is another department of [[Occult]] [[Science]], which has for its [[objects]] all kinds of [[Siddhis]] or acquirements of [[powers]] for securing the [[objects]] aimed at by means of invoking the [[gods]] presiding them by repeating such [[Mantras]] or [[formulas]] as are intended for the {{Wiki|purpose}} with the necessary {{Wiki|ceremonies}} attending thereto. The whole of the four [[Vedas]] consist of nothing but [[Mantras]], and as they proceed from the [[Pranava]] (the [[word]] [[Aum]]), the [[Pranava]], consequently Adi or [[Mula]] [[Mantra]] or the [[Mantra]] of all [[Mantras]]; and it is acceptable to both the followers of Nigamas (the [[Vedas]]) and [[Agamas]] (the [[Tantras]]). For this [[reason]] no [[Mantra]] can become effective or powerful without uttering the [[Pranava]] in the commencement of it. |
− | For the acquirement of the successful study and practice of this S'astra, the purity of body, speech, and mind is the first condition attending it; otherwise, they would lead to Black magic and to its disastrous results: that is to utter [Page iv] destruction of the soul or the higher Manas. Strong will - power and undaunted courage are also the conditions required for this purpose. | + | For the acquirement of the successful study and practice of this S'astra, the [[purity]] of [[body]], {{Wiki|speech}}, and [[mind]] is the first [[condition]] attending it; otherwise, they would lead to [[Black magic]] and to its disastrous results: that is to utter [Page iv] destruction of the [[soul]] or the higher [[Manas]]. Strong will - power and undaunted [[courage]] are also the [[conditions]] required for this {{Wiki|purpose}}. |
− | Though the Mantra and Yoga S'astras belong to the occult science, yet the difference between them is very great. The former is an objective science and the latter is a subjective one. | + | Though the [[Mantra]] and [[Yoga]] S'astras belong to the [[occult]] [[science]], yet the difference between them is very great. The former is an [[objective]] [[science]] and the [[latter]] is a [[subjective]] one. |
− | The Mantra S'astra develops the powers by appealing to the external objects, such as gods and goddesses (the forces in nature), while the Yogin develops them by self-culture or by unifying or identifying himself with the manifested universe as part and parcel of the Is'vara or the Creator. | + | The [[Mantra]] S'astra develops the [[powers]] by appealing to the [[external objects]], such as [[gods]] and [[goddesses]] (the forces in [[nature]]), while the [[Yogin]] develops them by self-culture or by unifying or identifying himself with the [[manifested]] [[universe]] as part and parcel of the [[Is'vara]] or the Creator. |
− | The Yogin by the virtue of his culture, gets all the powers of the Siddhis without effort while the Mantrika has to evoke them by the Mantras and the ceremonies attending them. | + | The [[Yogin]] by the [[virtue]] of his {{Wiki|culture}}, gets all the [[powers]] of the [[Siddhis]] without [[effort]] while the [[Mantrika]] has to evoke them by the [[Mantras]] and the {{Wiki|ceremonies}} attending them. |
− | In order to make this difference clear to the mind of our readers, we have in this form reprinted the paper read by Mr. Gopalacharlu and hope that our object will be accomplished. | + | In order to make this difference clear to the [[mind]] of our readers, we have in this [[form]] reprinted the paper read by Mr. Gopalacharlu and {{Wiki|hope}} that our [[object]] will be accomplished. |
− | We specially draw the attention of our readers to the fourth Section on “The Nature and Teachings of the | + | We specially draw the [[attention]] of our readers to [[the fourth]] Section on “The [[Nature]] and Teachings of the [[Tantras]]”. T. P.H. |
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
− | IT is with great diffidence that I ascend the platform today, to give you my few thoughts on mantras, a subject which, however interesting it may be, cannot be exhausted in a few essays. My object then is to place before you the results of my own studies in that direction, subject, of course, to the correction of my more advanced fellow Theosophists; and thus to benefit myself in one way. | + | IT is with great diffidence that I ascend the platform today, to give you my few [[thoughts]] on [[mantras]], a [[subject]] which, however [[interesting]] it may be, cannot be exhausted in a few {{Wiki|essays}}. My [[object]] then is to place before you the results of my [[own]] studies in that [[direction]], [[subject]], of course, to the {{Wiki|correction}} of my more advanced fellow [[Wikipedia:Theosophy|Theosophists]]; and thus to [[benefit]] myself in one way. |
− | I can only give you, owing to the shortness of the time at my disposal, the barest outlines [Page 2] of the subject. It is impossible for a single individual to master the information treated of in 37,00,000 verses containing the original writings on mantras and Occultism, known as the Agamas, besides several other works now supposed to have been lost; for occultism is treated in these writings in all its phases, and a theoretical knowledge of them presupposes a good deal of practical knowledge in one of them at least. | + | I can only give you, owing to the shortness of the time at my disposal, the barest outlines [Page 2] of the [[subject]]. It is impossible for a single {{Wiki|individual}} to [[master]] the [[information]] treated of in 37,00,000 verses containing the original writings on [[mantras]] and [[Occultism]], known as the [[Agamas]], besides several other works now supposed to have been lost; for [[occultism]] is treated in these writings in all its phases, and a [[theoretical knowledge]] of them presupposes a good deal of {{Wiki|practical}} [[knowledge]] in one of them at least. |
− | I cannot too strongly impress upon your minds the necessity of my giving references, and in important points quoting the authorities in support of my arguments, more especially because a slur has been cast upon us that we do not correctly represent the views of the ancients, and that we give out as correct what emanates from our brains, without taking | + | I cannot too strongly impress upon your [[minds]] the necessity of my giving references, and in important points quoting the authorities in support of my arguments, more especially because a slur has been cast upon us that we do not correctly represent the [[views]] of the ancients, and that we give out as correct what [[emanates]] from our {{Wiki|brains}}, without taking |
− | the trouble of seeing whether our statements are borne out by the master-minds of old. I, for one, beg leave to admit for a moment, without quoting any instances of such neglect of duty, the truth of such statements, and believe that you will all agree with me that the charge is partially true at least. I would therefore try my best to support my statements, with references to the best authoritative writings; for if we give the public, any more room to think [Page 3] of us as they now do, not only will the truth of our doctrines be less and less appreciated, but we shall be in their eyes no better than a set of self - styled masters who have nothing to show for our title. | + | the trouble of [[seeing]] whether our statements are borne out by the master-minds of old. I, for one, beg leave to admit for a [[moment]], without quoting any instances of such neglect of [[duty]], the [[truth]] of such statements, and believe that you will all agree with me that the charge is partially true at least. I would therefore try my best to support my statements, with references to the best authoritative writings; for if we give the public, any more room to think [Page 3] of us as they now do, not only will the [[truth]] of our [[doctrines]] be less and less appreciated, but we shall be in their [[eyes]] no better than a set of [[self]] - styled [[masters]] who have nothing to show for our title. |
− | The importance of sound has been most excellently sung by a poet of the Rg-veda, hoary with antiquity and wisdom, when he said: | + | The importance of [[sound]] has been most excellently sung by a poet of the Rg-veda, hoary with antiquity and [[wisdom]], when he said: |
− | Catvari vak parimita padani tani vidur brahmana ye manJsinah, guha trJni nihita nengayanti, tuffyam vaco manusya vadanti. | + | Catvari [[vak]] parimita padani tani vidur [[brahmana]] ye manJsinah, guha trJni nihita nengayanti, tuffyam vaco [[manusya]] vadanti. |
− | This literally means: All vaks are of four kinds: so the Brahmanas learned in the Vedas (know); three of which are latent, and the last is spoken. | + | This literally means: All vaks are of four kinds: so the [[Brahmanas]] learned in the [[Vedas]] (know); three of which are latent, and the last is spoken. |
− | This statement gave rise to the fourfold classification. The Vedas have been divided into four; the Vaidikas — l use the term in the sense in which Yaska used it, viz., the ancient Vedic teachers — say that the Pranava (Om) and the three mantras known as Vyahrtis (Bhuh, Bhuva; and Suvah) are here referred to; the grammarians consider the same | + | This statement gave rise to the fourfold {{Wiki|classification}}. The [[Vedas]] have been divided into four; the Vaidikas — l use the term in the [[sense]] in which {{Wiki|Yaska}} used it, viz., the [[ancient]] {{Wiki|Vedic}} [[teachers]] — say that the [[Pranava]] (Om) and the three [[mantras]] known as [[Vyahrtis]] ([[Bhuh]], [[Bhuva]]; and Suvah) are here referred to; the grammarians consider the same |
− | passage as referring to the grammatical forms and [Page 4] terminations, naman, akhyata, upasarga and nipata; those following the school of Nirukta interpret the same as the Rc, Yajus, Saman, and the words spoken of in the world. Those versed in Mantras'astra only enlarge the views of the last named by explaining them to mean the Para, Pas'yantT, Madhyama and VaikharT forms of Vak. [This Mantra forms the 45th hymn of the 164th Sukta of the 22nd Anuvaka of the 1 st Mandala of the Rg-veda. This Sukta contains 52 hymns the Rsi of which is DTrghatamas. The first 41 Mantras are addressed to Vis'vedevas; the 42nd and 45th to VagdevT, who is explained by Sayanacarya to mean the same as the Logos. I would in this connection refer the reader for further details to Yogas 'ikhopanisad ] | + | passage as referring to the {{Wiki|grammatical}} [[forms]] and [Page 4] terminations, naman, akhyata, [[upasarga]] and [[nipata]]; those following the school of [[Nirukta]] interpret the same as the Rc, [[Yajus]], [[Saman]], and the words spoken of in the [[world]]. Those versed in Mantras'astra only enlarge the [[views]] of the last named by explaining them to mean the Para, Pas'yantT, [[Madhyama]] and VaikharT [[forms]] of [[Vak]]. [This [[Mantra]] [[forms]] the 45th hymn of the 164th [[Sukta]] of the 22nd Anuvaka of the 1 st [[Mandala]] of the Rg-veda. This [[Sukta]] contains 52 hymns the Rsi of which is DTrghatamas. The first 41 [[Mantras]] are addressed to Vis'vedevas; the 42nd and 45th to VagdevT, who is explained by Sayanacarya to mean the same as the {{Wiki|Logos}}. I would in this [[connection]] refer the reader for further details to [[Yogas]] 'ikhopanisad ] |
− | This last interpretation is the basis on which the mantras were formed as I shall show you later on. | + | This last [[interpretation]] is the basis on which the [[mantras]] were formed as I shall show you later on. |
− | The potency of sound has been spoken of in very high terms by all writers of antiquity and by none more so than Patanjali himself, the well-known author of the Yoga Sutras, in his more splendid work, the Mahabhasya, a commentary on the grammatical rules of Panini. He says, the four horns [The reference is here to the Vedic passage: “Catnari s'rnga trayo asya pada dve s'Trse sapta hastaso asya, tridha baddho vrsabho roraviti maho devo martyan avives'a” | + | The [[potency]] of [[sound]] has been spoken of in very high terms by all writers of antiquity and by none more so than [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]] himself, the well-known author of the [[Yoga Sutras]], in his more splendid work, the [[Mahabhasya]], a commentary on the {{Wiki|grammatical}} {{Wiki|rules}} of [[Panini]]. He says, the four horns [The reference is here to the {{Wiki|Vedic}} passage: “Catnari s'rnga trayo asya [[pada]] dve s'Trse [[sapta]] hastaso asya, tridha baddho vrsabho roraviti maho devo martyan avives'a” |
− | are the four classes in [Page 5] which the Brahman is compared to a Bull; and this passage Patanjali takes for his authority. Kayyata in his commentary on Mahabhasya says that this is a description of Sabdabrahman (Logos) under the character of a Bull. The meaning of the Mantra is: | + | are the four classes in [Page 5] which the [[Brahman]] is compared to a Bull; and this passage [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]] takes for his authority. Kayyata in his commentary on [[Mahabhasya]] says that this is a description of Sabdabrahman ({{Wiki|Logos}}) under the [[character]] of a Bull. The meaning of the [[Mantra]] is: |
− | Words, noun, verb, prefix, particle, and other kinds (of grammatical terminations). The three feet thereof are the three times, the past, the present and the future; the two heads are the two natures of sound, the eternal, and the factitious. The seven hands there are the seven case affixes. “Trebly | + | Words, {{Wiki|noun}}, verb, prefix, {{Wiki|particle}}, and other kinds (of {{Wiki|grammatical}} terminations). The three feet thereof are the three times, the {{Wiki|past}}, the {{Wiki|present}} and the {{Wiki|future}}; the two heads are the two natures of [[sound]], the eternal, and the factitious. The seven hands there are the seven case affixes. “Trebly [[bound]]”, i.e., connected with the three localities, the {{Wiki|chest}}, the {{Wiki|throat}} and the head. The bull ([[vrsabha]]) is so called from its showering down (varsana) - (i.e., showering down enjoyments). It bellows ( roraviti ), i.e., makes a [[sound]]. How is this ? The verb means 'making a [[sound]]'. The ‘great [[God]] did enter {{Wiki|mortals}}' : the great [[God]], i.e., [[sound]]; {{Wiki|mortals}} in men whose lot it is to [[die]]: these he did enter in order that they might become assimilated with the [[God]]. |
− | This statement has been explained by his commentators to mean that the ETERNAL SOUND has become manifested in man, in order that he may be again assimilated into Him (The Eternal Sound or Sabdabrahman or the Logos) verily the man that knows the fitness of speech, whose sins have been removed by the employment of speech preceded by a knowledge of language and who, having split the knots of egotism, doth enter. [Page 6] | + | This statement has been explained by his commentators to mean that the ETERNAL SOUND has become [[manifested]] in man, in order that he may be again assimilated into Him (The Eternal [[Sound]] or Sabdabrahman or the {{Wiki|Logos}}) verily the man that [[knows]] the fitness of {{Wiki|speech}}, whose [[sins]] have been removed by the employment of {{Wiki|speech}} preceded by a [[knowledge]] of [[language]] and who, having split the knots of [[egotism]], doth enter. [Page 6] |
− | Patanjali next turns his attention to the Vedic hymn I have already quoted, and proceeds to say: | + | [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]] next turns his [[attention]] to the {{Wiki|Vedic}} hymn I have already quoted, and proceeds to say: |
− | Another text says: Four are the kinds of words, the divisions of speech. Hence do know the knowers of Brahman (Brahmanah) who have will over the mind; three placed in the cave, [ Vivarana explains | + | Another text says: Four are the kinds of words, the divisions of {{Wiki|speech}}. Hence do know the knowers of [[Brahman]] (Brahmanah) who have will over the [[mind]]; three placed in the [[cave]], [ Vivarana explains ‘[[cave]]' to mean ‘where the [[occult]] [[development]] of [[sound]] takes place'. By ‘not getting a glimpse thereof' is meant 'their not being the depositories of any kind |
− | of knowledge in regard to the three stages of sound anterior to its articulation.'] men take no notice of; the fourth (degree) of speech they utter'. The 'four words' that are the divisions of speech are the four sets of words, the nouns, verbs, prefixes and particles. 'Thou dost know the knowers of Brahman who have will over their minds,' - who have the will of their minds,(or have the mind in subjection to the will) — such is the meaning of the word manTsin. 'Three placed within the cave', they take no notice of; — of the three placed within the cave 'they take no note', they busy themselves not with them, they get not a glimpse thereof. 'The fourth (part) of speech men do utter' : the fourth (turTya) is that fourth part (of entireness) of speech which is found among men. | + | of [[knowledge]] in regard to the three stages of [[sound]] anterior to its articulation.'] men take no notice of; [[the fourth]] ([[degree]]) of {{Wiki|speech}} they utter'. The 'four words' that are the divisions of {{Wiki|speech}} are the four sets of words, the nouns, verbs, prefixes and {{Wiki|particles}}. 'Thou dost know the knowers of [[Brahman]] who have will over their [[minds]],' - who have the will of their minds,(or have the [[mind]] in subjection to the will) — such is the meaning of the [[word]] manTsin. 'Three placed within the [[cave]]', they take no notice of; — of the three placed within the [[cave]] 'they take no note', they busy themselves not with them, they get not a glimpse thereof. 'The fourth (part) of {{Wiki|speech}} men do utter' : [[the fourth]] (turTya) is that fourth part (of entireness) of {{Wiki|speech}} which is found among men. |
− | I have almost literally translated the words of Patanjali as a writer on grammar — the grammar of factitious speech, the proper study of which, he says, preserves the Vedas and prevents their corruption saying. By saying ‘factitious speech' he means the VaikharT Vak, for we believe that the other three forms of Vak form the subject of occult sciences. | + | I have almost literally translated the words of [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]] as a writer on {{Wiki|grammar}} — the {{Wiki|grammar}} of factitious {{Wiki|speech}}, the proper study of which, he says, preserves the [[Vedas]] and prevents their corruption saying. By saying ‘factitious {{Wiki|speech}}' he means the VaikharT [[Vak]], for we believe that the other three [[forms]] of [[Vak]] [[form]] the [[subject]] of [[occult]] [[sciences]]. |
− | The Hindus believe that Hanuman was taught by Surya in nine grammars: and leaving off the ninth which treats of the factitious language, we have the eight grammars speaking the hidden forms of speech, the number eight including certain intermediate stages of the three latent Vaks or forms of speech alluded to above. This lowest form of speech is the object of knowledge, and one of the objects of which is obtaining the full knowledge of words, or, to adopt Patanjali's explanation, in order to obtain a command over his own mind. | + | The [[Hindus]] believe that [[Hanuman]] was [[taught]] by [[Surya]] in nine grammars: and leaving off the ninth which treats of the factitious [[language]], we have the eight grammars {{Wiki|speaking}} the hidden [[forms]] of {{Wiki|speech}}, the number eight [[including]] certain [[intermediate]] stages of the three latent Vaks or [[forms]] of {{Wiki|speech}} alluded to above. This lowest [[form]] of {{Wiki|speech}} is the [[object of knowledge]], and one of the [[objects]] of which is obtaining the full [[knowledge]] of words, or, to adopt [[Patanjali's]] explanation, in order to obtain a command over his [[own mind]]. |
− | “Of trinal speech distinguished by its several locations as the pronounced ( VaikharT), the intermediate (madhyama) and the seeing ( pas'yantT). This marvellous one is the ultimate degree. Among these the pronounced is that which is the object of hearing, the intermediate abiding in the region of the heart is the cause of discourse, since (else) there would never be words perceived; but the pas'yantT or 'the seeing' (so-named actively honoris causa; while it means, what is seen by the enlightened) is beyond vulgar | + | “Of trinal {{Wiki|speech}} {{Wiki|distinguished}} by its several locations as the pronounced ( VaikharT), the [[intermediate]] ([[madhyama]]) and the [[seeing]] ( pas'yantT). This marvellous one is the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[degree]]. Among these the pronounced is that which is the [[object]] of hearing, the [[intermediate]] abiding in the region of the [[heart]] is the [[cause]] of [[discourse]], since (else) there would never be words [[perceived]]; but the pas'yantT or 'the [[seeing]]' (so-named actively honoris causa; while it means, what is seen by the [[enlightened]]) is beyond [[vulgar]] |
− | concernment, but in it moreover do those with concentrated minds arrive at the distinction between the bases and the affixes. But in the ultimate (para vak), it is not so (no [Page 8] distinction of parts) being there discoverable. Speech is on that account said to be ' trinal '. [ Bartrhari's VakyapadTya quoted by Nages'abhatta in his BhasyapradTpoddyota. I may here add that Bhartrhari was one of the first commentators on the Mahabhasya; and the subsequent commentary of Kayyata, and the commentary thereon by Nages'abhatta, are based on this great work which is said to have consisted of 100,000 granthas ] | + | concernment, but in it moreover do those with [[concentrated]] [[minds]] arrive at the {{Wiki|distinction}} between the bases and the affixes. But in the [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] (para [[vak]]), it is not so (no [Page 8] {{Wiki|distinction}} of parts) being there discoverable. {{Wiki|Speech}} is on that account said to be ' trinal '. [ Bartrhari's VakyapadTya quoted by Nages'abhatta in his BhasyapradTpoddyota. I may here add that Bhartrhari was one of the first commentators on the [[Mahabhasya]]; and the subsequent commentary of Kayyata, and the commentary thereon by Nages'abhatta, are based on this great work which is said to have consisted of 100,000 granthas ] |
− | It is plain from what has been said above that the laws which govern ordinary speech also govern mantras, the latter being only speech arranged according to certain modulations of sound. Such being the case we shall now enquire into the signification of the word 'mantra'. | + | It is plain from what has been said above that the laws which govern ordinary {{Wiki|speech}} also govern [[mantras]], the [[latter]] being only {{Wiki|speech}} arranged according to certain modulations of [[sound]]. Such being the case we shall now enquire into the signification of the [[word]] '[[mantra]]'. |
− | + | ‘[[Mantra]]' has been derived from the [[root]] man to think: and it has among several other ways, also been explained to be so called on account of its protecting the [[Upasaka]], i.e., one who develops the [[occult]] power by practising it with its {{Wiki|accompaniments}}, from all sorts of dangers and difficulties. The [[word]] is also {{Wiki|cognate}} with [[Manana]] meaning ‘to think', and described as one of the [[paths]] leading to [[Brahman]]. [[Mantras]] are of the VaikharT [[vak]] and correspond to the Sthula plane of {{Wiki|matter}}. | |
− | The origin of mantras and devatas is this. Brahman which is known in the Mantras'astras as Bindu, possesses a force called BTja, but known in the Vedantic Writings as S'akti or [Page 9] Prakrti. Their united action is Nada, of S'abdabrahman or the Logos. There is, however, a little difference of opinion among this class of occultists as to the nature of the sounds uttered by the Mantras. One class thinks them to be manifestations of the Logos; others again consider them as the manifestations of the S'akti, and say that | + | The origin of [[mantras]] and [[devatas]] is this. [[Brahman]] which is known in the Mantras'astras as [[Bindu]], possesses a force called BTja, but known in the {{Wiki|Vedantic}} Writings as S'akti or [Page 9] [[Prakrti]]. Their united [[action]] is [[Nada]], of S'abdabrahman or the {{Wiki|Logos}}. There is, however, a little difference of opinion among this class of [[occultists]] as to the [[nature]] of the {{Wiki|sounds}} uttered by the [[Mantras]]. One class [[thinks]] them to be [[manifestations]] of the {{Wiki|Logos}}; others again consider them as the [[manifestations]] of the S'akti, and say that |
− | S'abdabrahman is the consciousness in all things. This consciousness resides in man in the KundalinT NadT and is said to be the origin of all the letters of the Alphabet. | + | S'abdabrahman is the [[consciousness]] in all things. This [[consciousness]] resides in man in the KundalinT NadT and is said to be the origin of all the letters of the [[Alphabet]]. |
− | We have now three kinds of creations. From Bindu we have in order, Sadas'iva, Rudra, Visnu, Brahma, which are either so many different Logoi, or different aspects of one and the same principle. The other creation is from S'akti. Its first manifestation is Mahat, which is either Sattvika, Rajasa or Tamasa. These give rise to the three kinds of Ahamkara. On the plane of Ahamkara we have the ten deities known as Diks or directions, Vayu, As'vins, the Fire, the Sun, [ It must be here said that the sun, fire. etc., do not mean those on the physical plane with which we are acquainted, but their astral, or in some cases, even higher counterparts ]. Pracetas, Indra, Upendra, Mitra, and the ten senses and the Tanmatras. From these last we have the five elements [Page 10] known to Indian philosophy. Each one of them is thus symbolised. | + | We have now three kinds of creations. From [[Bindu]] we have in order, Sadas'iva, [[Rudra]], {{Wiki|Visnu}}, [[Brahma]], which are either so many different Logoi, or different aspects of one and the same [[principle]]. The other creation is from S'akti. Its first [[manifestation]] is [[Mahat]], which is either [[Sattvika]], Rajasa or [[Tamasa]]. These give rise to the three kinds of [[Ahamkara]]. On the plane of [[Ahamkara]] we have the ten [[deities]] known as Diks or [[directions]], {{Wiki|Vayu}}, As'vins, the [[Fire]], the {{Wiki|Sun}}, [ It must be here said that the {{Wiki|sun}}, [[fire]]. etc., do not mean those on the [[physical]] plane with which we are acquainted, but their [[astral]], or in some cases, even higher counterparts ]. Pracetas, [[Indra]], Upendra, [[Mitra]], and the ten [[senses]] and the [[Tanmatras]]. From these last we have the [[five elements]] [Page 10] known to [[Indian philosophy]]. Each one of them is thus symbolised. |
− | All the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet belonging to these tattvas follow the symbol used for the particular class to which they belong and these symbols play a not unimportant part in the practice of the Mantras. | + | All the letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]] belonging to these [[tattvas]] follow the [[symbol]] used for the particular class to which they belong and these [[symbols]] play a not unimportant part in the practice of the [[Mantras]]. |
− | From these elements the physical body of man takes its origin, and in it the KundalinT force is located. The three nadTs known as Ida, Pi’ngala and Susumna extend from the nose to a little below the navel, and the KundalinT is located a little above the anus. It is described as coiled like a serpent, and when awakened by the power of Yoga, it becomes straightened, and shuts the passages to the three nadTs mentioned above. According to Indian writers, S'abda takes its origin in the KundalinT; and it is the sound which takes its rise from KundalinT that passes the three stages Para, Pas'yantT and Madhyama and at last comes out as the one which we all hear and speak comprising the fifty letters of the Samskrt [Page 11] Alphabet. It has been briefly said that the world of S'abda takes its origin from sounds. In other words, it means that a name or sound expressed to denote a particular object is identical with the object itself. | | + | From these [[elements]] the [[physical body]] of man takes its origin, and in it the KundalinT force is located. The three nadTs known as Ida, Pi’ngala and [[Susumna]] extend from the {{Wiki|nose}} to a little below the {{Wiki|navel}}, and the KundalinT is located a little above the anus. It is described as coiled like a [[serpent]], and when [[awakened]] by the power of [[Yoga]], it becomes straightened, and shuts the passages to the three nadTs mentioned above. According to [[Indian]] writers, S'abda takes its origin in the KundalinT; and it is the [[sound]] which takes its rise from KundalinT that passes the three stages Para, Pas'yantT and [[Madhyama]] and at last comes out as the one which we all hear and speak comprising the fifty letters of the Samskrt [Page 11] [[Alphabet]]. It has been briefly said that the [[world]] of S'abda takes its origin from {{Wiki|sounds}}. In other words, it means that a [[name]] or [[sound]] expressed to denote a particular [[object]] is [[identical]] with the [[object]] itself. | |
− | This idea will no doubt appear very curious to those of us who have been used to the modern way of thinking, but is pre-eminently an Indian idea; and no Indian writer has explained this theory more clearly than Patanjali, whom I quote once more: | + | This [[idea]] will no [[doubt]] appear very curious to those of us who have been used to the {{Wiki|modern}} way of [[thinking]], but is pre-eminently an [[Indian]] [[idea]]; and no [[Indian]] writer has explained this {{Wiki|theory}} more clearly than [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]], whom I quote once more: |
− | Among those (viz., sounds, or words, secular and spiritual) the secular in the first place are such as cow, house, man and Brahma. The scriptural are verily indeed as AgnimJle purohitam (and such other passages found in the Vedas); now (let us take) | + | Among those (viz., {{Wiki|sounds}}, or words, {{Wiki|secular}} and [[spiritual]]) the {{Wiki|secular}} in the first place are such as {{Wiki|cow}}, house, man and [[Brahma]]. The [[scriptural]] are verily indeed as AgnimJle purohitam (and such other passages found in the [[Vedas]]); now (let us take) ‘{{Wiki|cow}}'. Here, which is the [[word]] ? That which is in the shape of a thing with dewlap, tail, hump, hoofs, |
− | horns — pray is that the word ? Nay, replies he (referring to Papini whose Sutras on Samskrt grammar and philology Patanjali comments upon). That is not a word, but verily a substance. Then — the hints, gestures and winking — is that the word? Nay, he replies — that verily is the action. Then the white, the black, the tawny, the spotted, is that the | + | horns — pray is that the [[word]] ? Nay, replies he (referring to Papini whose [[Sutras]] on Samskrt {{Wiki|grammar}} and {{Wiki|philology}} [[Wikipedia:Patanjali|Patanjali's]] comments upon). That is not a [[word]], but verily a [[substance]]. Then — the hints, gestures and winking — is that the [[word]]? Nay, he replies — that verily is the [[action]]. Then the white, the black, the tawny, the spotted, is that the |
− | word? Nay, he replies, that verily is quality .Then that which in many is different (and yet) not different — and that which is not destroyed in things that are destroyed by disintegration — that which in the common nature (of all that exists) — is that the word? Nay, he replies — verily is the form (implying the genus or Platonic idea). What then is the word ? A word is that through which, when uttered, there is the [Page 12] cognition (i.e.,) things with dewlap, tail, hump, hoofs and horns, or in the world a noise; a noise with a recognized series is a word or sound. | + | [[word]]? Nay, he replies, that verily is [[quality]] .Then that which in many is different (and yet) not different — and that which is not destroyed in things that are destroyed by {{Wiki|disintegration}} — that which in the common [[nature]] (of all that [[exists]]) — is that the [[word]]? Nay, he replies — verily is the [[form]] (implying the genus or {{Wiki|Platonic}} [[idea]]). What then is the [[word]] ? A [[word]] is that through which, when uttered, there is the [Page 12] [[cognition]] (i.e.,) things with dewlap, tail, hump, hoofs and horns, or in the [[world]] a noise; a noise with a [[recognized]] series is a [[word]] or [[sound]]. |
− | This last statement has been explained by Kayyata to mean that an identity ( tadatmya) exists between a word and the object it signifies. It is generally said that the Kundalini has fifty letters. This means a great many things. It has been explained in the Mantras'astras that all the fifty letters take their rise in their para form of course, from the Kundalini; and that the force latent in it becomes manifested in the forms of sounds which to the ancient Indian grammarians comprised the fifty letters of the Samskrt Alphabet. | + | This last statement has been explained by Kayyata to mean that an [[Wikipedia:Identity (social science)|identity]] ( [[tadatmya]]) [[exists]] between a [[word]] and the [[object]] it {{Wiki|signifies}}. It is generally said that the [[Kundalini]] has fifty letters. This means a great many things. It has been explained in the Mantras'astras that all the fifty letters take their rise in their para [[form]] of course, from the [[Kundalini]]; and that the force latent in it becomes [[manifested]] in the [[forms]] of {{Wiki|sounds}} which to the {{Wiki|ancient Indian}} grammarians comprised the fifty letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]]. |
− | When first any attempt is made to utter any sound, the sound of Pranava or Om is heard in the heart. It is in fact the very first sound that one is said to hear when he attempts to speak out any word: and in the case of any single sound (Ekaksara) as for instance, the very first sound you would make, or one hears, before you pronounce the letter or | + | When first any attempt is made to utter any [[sound]], the [[sound]] of [[Pranava]] or Om is heard in the [[heart]]. It is in fact the very first [[sound]] that one is said to hear when he attempts to speak out any [[word]]: and in the case of any single [[sound]] (Ekaksara) as for instance, the very first [[sound]] you would make, or one hears, before you pronounce the [[letter]] or |
− | sound, is the Pranava: and you hear this sound so long as one has life or Prana. Of course we cannot ordinarily hear the sound of Pranava unless we are trained in Yoga. Proceeding from this analogy, they inferred, [Page 13] or knew that this sound can be heard everywhere, for, as I said before, any sound that is intended to be produced is always preceded by the sound of Pranava. | + | [[sound]], is the [[Pranava]]: and you hear this [[sound]] so long as one has [[life]] or [[Prana]]. Of course we cannot ordinarily hear the [[sound]] of [[Pranava]] unless we are trained in [[Yoga]]. Proceeding from this analogy, they inferred, [Page 13] or knew that this [[sound]] can be heard everywhere, for, as I said before, any [[sound]] that is intended to be produced is always preceded by the [[sound]] of [[Pranava]]. |
− | We thus see the reason why the ancients said that Pranava was the first of all sounds, and therefore of all mantras; how it was held to be universal, and how on this physical plane it came to mean Prana. It also means Brahman, being co-existent with it in being universal: and being thus the first of all sounds every sound or mantra was considered its manifestation. | + | We thus see the [[reason]] why the ancients said that [[Pranava]] was the first of all {{Wiki|sounds}}, and therefore of all [[mantras]]; how it was held to be [[universal]], and how on this [[physical]] plane it came to mean [[Prana]]. It also means [[Brahman]], being co-existent with it in being [[universal]]: and being thus the first of all {{Wiki|sounds}} every [[sound]] or [[mantra]] was considered its [[manifestation]]. |
− | We shall now proceed to consider the original of mantras. I have already said that sound comes from the Kundalini , through the nadis, and the mouth. Those nadis are hollow and terminate a little below the navel, and through them the ten kinds of air known as Prana; Apana, Vyana, Udana, Samana, Krkara, Devadatta, Dhanamjaya, Naga and Kurma, take their rise. | + | We shall now proceed to consider the original of [[mantras]]. I have already said that [[sound]] comes from the [[Kundalini]] , through the [[nadis]], and the {{Wiki|mouth}}. Those [[nadis]] are hollow and terminate a little below the {{Wiki|navel}}, and through them the ten kinds of [[air]] known as [[Prana]]; [[Apana]], [[Vyana]], [[Udana]], [[Samana]], [[Krkara]], [[Devadatta]], [[Dhanamjaya]], [[Naga]] and [[Kurma]], take their rise. |
− | The sound proceeds from Kundalini to one of the nadls, the particular nadl being determined by the letter intended to be produced. Thus letters A ( ^ ) to Ah ( ^* ) pass through Ida, Ka ( ^) Ma ( H ) through Pingala and Ya (^) to Ksa (^ ) through Susumna. The three nadis are [Page 14] presided over respectively by the Moon, the Sun and Agni; in other words there exists an intimate, and to us inexplicable, relation between these deities, and the nadTs, the former influencing the latter. It is on this account that the sounds coming from Ida are known in Samskrt grammar as Saumya (literally related to Moon) and those from Susumna as Usman meaning hot or fiery. The saumyas are also so called, because | + | The [[sound]] proceeds from [[Kundalini]] to one of the nadls, the particular nadl being determined by the [[letter]] intended to be produced. Thus letters A ( ^ ) to [[Ah]] ( ^* ) pass through Ida, Ka ( ^) Ma ( H ) through [[Pingala]] and Ya (^) to Ksa (^ ) through [[Susumna]]. The three [[nadis]] are [Page 14] presided over respectively by the [[Moon]], the {{Wiki|Sun}} and [[Agni]]; in other words there [[exists]] an intimate, and to us inexplicable, [[relation]] between these [[deities]], and the nadTs, the former influencing the [[latter]]. It is on this account that the {{Wiki|sounds}} coming from Ida are known in Samskrt {{Wiki|grammar}} as Saumya (literally related to [[Moon]]) and those from [[Susumna]] as Usman meaning [[hot]] or fiery. The saumyas are also so called, because |
− | they do not require much effort in pronouncing them as they pass straight through the Ida nadT. The letters Ka to Ma have sprung up from them. Thus, letters Ka to Ma are called Pranins (animated beings) while A to Ah are called Prana (life-principle). They are symbols of the twenty-five tattvas, the last letter Ma symbolising the twenty-fifth principle the JTvatman, or Paramatman according to the view we take. The third series extending from Ya to Ksa, and coming through the Susumna are called Vayapakas, from their being extended, or composed of the other two series already spoken of, and they play a very important part in the composition of mantras, for their insertion is entirely dependent on the result we may wish to obtain. | + | they do not require much [[effort]] in pronouncing them as they pass straight through the Ida nadT. The letters Ka to Ma have sprung up from them. Thus, letters Ka to Ma are called Pranins (animated [[beings]]) while A to [[Ah]] are called [[Prana]] ([[life-principle]]). They are [[symbols]] of the twenty-five [[tattvas]], the last [[letter]] Ma symbolising the twenty-fifth [[principle]] the JTvatman, or [[Paramatman]] according to the view we take. The third series extending from Ya to Ksa, and coming through the [[Susumna]] are called Vayapakas, from their being extended, or composed of the other two series already spoken of, and they play a very important part in the composition of [[mantras]], for their insertion is entirely dependent on the result we may wish to obtain. |
− | To summarize then, the sound in its passage from the KundalinT to the end of the nadTs [Page 15] is the stage of para: that of its passage through the nadTs is its pas'yantT stage: from the end of the nadTs to the throat it is in its madhyama stage, while that which passes from the throat to the mouth is its vaikhaff stage. The sounds or letters on the physical plane are divided into those of PrthvT, Ap, Tejas, Vayu and Akas'a. | + | To summarize then, the [[sound]] in its passage from the KundalinT to the end of the nadTs [Page 15] is the stage of para: that of its passage through the nadTs is its pas'yantT stage: from the end of the nadTs to the {{Wiki|throat}} it is in its [[madhyama]] stage, while that which passes from the {{Wiki|throat}} to the {{Wiki|mouth}} is its vaikhaff stage. The {{Wiki|sounds}} or letters on the [[physical]] plane are divided into those of PrthvT, Ap, [[Tejas]], {{Wiki|Vayu}} and Akas'a. |
<poem> | <poem> | ||
Thus: | Thus: | ||
− | Vayu,— ka, kha, ga, gha, na, a, a, r, ha, s'a, ya. | + | {{Wiki|Vayu}},— ka, kha, ga, gha, na, a, a, r, ha, s'a, ya. |
− | Agni, — ca, cha, ja, jha, na, i, T, rT, ksa, ra. | + | [[Agni]], — ca, cha, ja, jha, na, i, T, rT, ksa, ra. |
− | PrthvT, — ta, tha, da, dha, na, u, u, l, sa, va, la. | + | PrthvT, — ta, tha, da, [[dha]], na, u, u, l, sa, va, la. |
− | Ap, — ta, tha, da, dha, na, e, ai, IT, sa. | + | Ap, — ta, tha, da, [[dha]], na, e, ai, IT, sa. |
− | Akas'a, — pa, pha, ba, bha, ma, o, au, am, ah. | + | Akas'a, — pa, pha, ba, bha, ma, o, au, am, [[ah]]. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | Mantras being a combination of sounds to suit a purpose, they may be either of one syllable or a thousand syllables. The latter being its maximum limit, mantras of one, two, and three syllables are, strictly speaking, arrangement of sounds scientifically blended together to produce a result, and are consequently very potent: these and the four syllabled mantras do not generally admit of any analysis whatever, as in the case of those of five syllables and more, for the reason that they are generally composed of the least number of BTjas, and have no room for the insertion [Page 16] of the name of the devata as in the case of the many-worded ones: and the only way we can find out the devata is by a | + | [[Mantras]] being a combination of {{Wiki|sounds}} to suit a {{Wiki|purpose}}, they may be either of one {{Wiki|syllable}} or a thousand {{Wiki|syllables}}. The [[latter]] being its maximum limit, [[mantras]] of one, two, and three {{Wiki|syllables}} are, strictly {{Wiki|speaking}}, arrangement of {{Wiki|sounds}} {{Wiki|scientifically}} blended together to produce a result, and are consequently very potent: these and the four syllabled [[mantras]] do not generally admit of any analysis whatever, as in the case of those of five {{Wiki|syllables}} and more, for the [[reason]] that they are generally composed of the least number of BTjas, and have no room for the insertion [Page 16] of the [[name]] of the [[devata]] as in the case of the many-worded ones: and the only way we can find out the [[devata]] is by a |
− | careful examination of the BTjas employed. Those of five syllables or more, are divisible into (1) the Pranava, (2) the BTja showing the object of the mantra, and (3) the name of the deity. Not all the mantras begin with Pranava, but those that begin with it are considered more sacred to a deity than those which do not begin with it. The reason is plain enough, being that the mere presence of Pranava, which is considered as the mother of all mantras, will accelerate the force of that mantra. | + | careful {{Wiki|examination}} of the BTjas employed. Those of five {{Wiki|syllables}} or more, are divisible into (1) the [[Pranava]], (2) the BTja showing the [[object]] of the [[mantra]], and (3) the [[name]] of the [[deity]]. Not all the [[mantras]] begin with [[Pranava]], but those that begin with it are considered more [[sacred]] to a [[deity]] than those which do not begin with it. The [[reason]] is plain enough, being that the mere presence of [[Pranava]], which is considered as the mother of all [[mantras]], will accelerate the force of that [[mantra]]. |
− | The objects of the Mantras are various | + | The [[objects]] of the [[Mantras]] are various |
<poem> | <poem> | ||
(1) Subjection (vas'ya), | (1) Subjection (vas'ya), | ||
− | (2) attraction (akarsana), | + | (2) [[attraction]] ([[akarsana]]), |
− | (3) fascination (mohana), | + | (3) fascination ([[mohana]]), |
− | (4) deadening the faculties (stambhana), | + | (4) deadening the [[faculties]] ([[stambhana]]), |
− | (5) creating enmity (vidvesana), | + | (5) creating [[enmity]] (vidvesana), |
− | (6) death (marana), | + | (6) [[death]] ([[marana]]), |
(7) ruining (uccatana), | (7) ruining (uccatana), | ||
− | (8) soothing ( apyayana) ; and the BTjaic terminations show the object of Mantras. | + | (8) soothing ( apyayana) ; and the BTjaic terminations show the [[object]] of [[Mantras]]. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | In case of vas'ya, uccatana, and akarsana, the termination hum should be used; phatfor marana; namah for stambhana, vidvesana and mohana; vausat for apyayana. This rule should be observed by a beginner, but when once he masters a mantra, this act being known as Mantra-siddhi, he masters willpower [Page 17] also, and can then use any termination for fulfilling any object. But immediate results will follow if he also pays attention to the above rule. This leads us to think that only the efficacy of the willpower is necessary, but there is a sort of efficacy in the sounds themselves uttered during the repetition of a mantra. | + | In case of vas'ya, uccatana, and [[akarsana]], the termination [[hum]] should be used; phatfor [[marana]]; [[namah]] for [[stambhana]], vidvesana and [[mohana]]; vausat for apyayana. This {{Wiki|rule}} should be observed by a beginner, but when once he [[masters]] a [[mantra]], this act being known as [[Mantra-siddhi]], he [[masters]] willpower [Page 17] also, and can then use any termination for fulfilling any [[object]]. But immediate results will follow if he also pays [[attention]] to the above {{Wiki|rule}}. This leads us to think that only the efficacy of the willpower is necessary, but there is a sort of efficacy in the {{Wiki|sounds}} themselves uttered during the repetition of a [[mantra]]. |
− | Mantras are either masculine, feminine, or neuter, according to the nature of the devata addressed to, and of actions. Those addressed to a female deity , are also called vidyas. The eight purposes above mentioned may be thus classified according to the nature of the devata addressed. Those that terminate with the endings hum and phat are male mantras; but there is a class of Indian Occultists who consider every mantra as masculine. Those ending with svaha and vausat are feminine in their action, while those with namah are neuter. Probably the reason for this classification lies in the fact that the pronunciation of hum and phat are more forcible, and produce a greater disturbance in the akas'a, than either svaha, vausat or namah. Under the head of feminine mantras again are included all such mantras of one syllable, but consisting of more than one letter as kma, khma, kra, etc. [Page 18] | + | [[Mantras]] are either {{Wiki|masculine}}, {{Wiki|feminine}}, or neuter, according to the [[nature]] of the [[devata]] addressed to, and of [[actions]]. Those addressed to a {{Wiki|female}} [[deity]] , are also called [[vidyas]]. The eight purposes above mentioned may be thus classified according to the [[nature]] of the [[devata]] addressed. Those that terminate with the endings [[hum]] and [[phat]] are {{Wiki|male}} [[mantras]]; but there is a class of [[Indian]] [[Occultists]] who consider every [[mantra]] as {{Wiki|masculine}}. Those ending with [[svaha]] and vausat are {{Wiki|feminine}} in their [[action]], while those with [[namah]] are neuter. Probably the [[reason]] for this {{Wiki|classification}} lies in the fact that the pronunciation of [[hum]] and [[phat]] are more forcible, and produce a greater {{Wiki|disturbance}} in the akas'a, than either [[svaha]], vausat or [[namah]]. Under the head of {{Wiki|feminine}} [[mantras]] again are included all such [[mantras]] of one {{Wiki|syllable}}, but consisting of more than one [[letter]] as kma, khma, kra, etc. [Page 18] |
− | One of the advantages of this classification is that these mantras may be best practised by persons enjoying different periods of life; for it is laid down almost as a rule that the feminine mantras should be practised before sixteen years of age, and the rest above that age. | + | One of the advantages of this {{Wiki|classification}} is that these [[mantras]] may be best practised by persons enjoying different periods of [[life]]; for it is laid down almost as a {{Wiki|rule}} that the {{Wiki|feminine}} [[mantras]] should be practised before sixteen years of age, and the rest above that age. |
− | The excellence of the Samskrt alphabet will be apparent when we consider that one had all the occult laws above hinted at, can be observed only in connection with it, and none else; and also that the knowledge of occult dynamics which the ancients possessed, enabled them to find out that these laws can be best worked out in the case of this Alphabet called Samskrt, meaning 'well-done' or 'well- arranged'; in short a perfect Alphabet. | + | The [[excellence]] of the Samskrt [[alphabet]] will be apparent when we consider that one had all the [[occult]] laws above hinted at, can be observed only in [[connection]] with it, and none else; and also that the [[knowledge]] of [[occult]] dynamics which the ancients possessed, enabled them to find out that these laws can be best worked out in the case of this [[Alphabet]] called Samskrt, meaning 'well-done' or 'well- arranged'; in short a {{Wiki|perfect}} [[Alphabet]]. |
− | The number of mantras existing in the Samskrt language is generally stated in occult writings as seven crores. This gives us only a rough idea, but the exact number is 67,108,863. Every mantra of any number of syllables must fall under one of the 26 kinds of Chandas, and that the number given out in works on Samskrt prosody. These denote the 26 ways in which different sounds can be arranged, taken one at a time, two at a time, and so on, the total number of ways in which they can be so arranged being, as we [Page 19] know from algebra, 2 26; — 1 or 67,108,863. Mantras are also divided into those of Agni and Soma. If in a mantra there are more letters coming out from Pingala NadT it is Agni mantra; if of Susumna, it belongs to Soma and is called a Saumya mantra; and so on. [Page 20] | + | The number of [[mantras]] [[existing]] in the Samskrt [[language]] is generally stated in [[occult]] writings as seven crores. This gives us only a rough [[idea]], but the exact number is 67,108,863. Every [[mantra]] of any number of {{Wiki|syllables}} must fall under one of the 26 kinds of [[Chandas]], and that the number given out in works on Samskrt {{Wiki|prosody}}. These denote the 26 ways in which different {{Wiki|sounds}} can be arranged, taken one at a time, two at a time, and so on, the total number of ways in which they can be so arranged being, as we [Page 19] know from algebra, 2 26; — 1 or 67,108,863. [[Mantras]] are also divided into those of [[Agni]] and Soma. If in a [[mantra]] there are more letters coming out from [[Pingala]] NadT it is [[Agni]] [[mantra]]; if of [[Susumna]], it belongs to Soma and is called a Saumya [[mantra]]; and so on. [Page 20] |
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
− | ONE of the most secret correspondences existing between the mantras on the VaikharT Vak or the Sthula plane of matter, and the higher planes is BTjas , which I have partly hinted at in the preceding Section. The central idea involved in the working of the mantras is that certain sounds when uttered produce a disturbance in the Akas'a which is, in its turn communicated, according to the severity of such a disturbance, to the higher planes. It stands to reason, therefore, that the greater the disturbance, the greater will be the communication to the higher planes. The nature of the disturbance cannot be judged from the known laws of physics, as that science has rarely meddled with the higher planes of matter. All that we can, therefore, say is that there exists some relation between sounds, and the disturbance in the Akas'a , and that certain kinds of sounds produce | + | ONE of the most secret correspondences [[existing]] between the [[mantras]] on the VaikharT [[Vak]] or the Sthula plane of {{Wiki|matter}}, and the higher planes is BTjas , which I have partly hinted at in the preceding Section. The central [[idea]] involved in the working of the [[mantras]] is that certain {{Wiki|sounds}} when uttered produce a {{Wiki|disturbance}} in the Akas'a which is, in its turn communicated, according to the severity of such a {{Wiki|disturbance}}, to the higher planes. It stands to [[reason]], therefore, that the greater the {{Wiki|disturbance}}, the greater will be the [[communication]] to the higher planes. The [[nature]] of the {{Wiki|disturbance}} cannot be judged from the known laws of [[physics]], as that [[science]] has rarely meddled with the higher planes of {{Wiki|matter}}. All that we can, therefore, say is that there [[exists]] some [[relation]] between {{Wiki|sounds}}, and the {{Wiki|disturbance}} in the Akas'a , and that certain kinds of {{Wiki|sounds}} produce |
− | certain kinds of disturbance. These sounds are known in Samskrt [Page 21] by the name of BTjaksaras, and they have been classed under various heads, denoting those the effects of which are of a particular nature; the latent forces in the letters being known as BTjas. All the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet are also BTjaksaras, and as everything in nature can be judged from the three standpoints of Visnu, S'iva and S'akti, we have also three different sets of meanings according as they are either Vaisnava, S'aiva and S'akta. Thus there are three ways of interpreting a mantra, composed as it is of various BTjaksaras, and according as it belongs to either Visnu, S'iva or S'akti. It must at the same time be said that each one of these devatas, is an aggregate of several forces, each known in its turn by the name of devata; and one can easily see by inspection, what particular force is intended to be invoked in a given mantra. These ideas should be borne in mind for a correct understanding of what follows. | + | certain kinds of {{Wiki|disturbance}}. These {{Wiki|sounds}} are known in Samskrt [Page 21] by the [[name]] of BTjaksaras, and they have been classed under various heads, denoting those the effects of which are of a particular [[nature]]; the latent forces in the letters being known as BTjas. All the letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]] are also BTjaksaras, and as everything in [[nature]] can be judged from the three standpoints of {{Wiki|Visnu}}, S'iva and S'akti, we have also three different sets of meanings according as they are either Vaisnava, S'aiva and S'akta. Thus there are [[three ways]] of interpreting a [[mantra]], composed as it is of various BTjaksaras, and according as it belongs to either {{Wiki|Visnu}}, S'iva or S'akti. It must at the same time be said that each one of these [[devatas]], is an [[aggregate]] of several forces, each known in its turn by the [[name]] of [[devata]]; and one can easily see by inspection, what particular force is intended to be invoked in a given [[mantra]]. These [[ideas]] should be borne in [[mind]] for a correct [[understanding]] of what follows. |
− | A chart is given at the end, as an appendix, containing the significations of the BTja forces latent in the 50 letters of the Samskrt Alphabet; as such a thing will be too tedious if it finds a place in the body of the essay. It has been prepared at the expense of, a good deal of labour, as it involved the study of [Page 22] more than seven or eight large Samhitas; in the three sets of Agamas, — Pancaratra, S'aiva and S'akta. A very curious conventionality is found to have been used in the Agamas, viz., of designating BTjaksaras, by the names of certain trees; as for example, “Join Mandara with | + | A chart is given at the end, as an appendix, containing the significations of the BTja forces latent in the 50 letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]]; as such a thing will be too tedious if it finds a place in the [[body]] of the essay. It has been prepared at the expense of, a good deal of labour, as it involved the study of [Page 22] more than seven or eight large [[Samhitas]]; in the three sets of [[Agamas]], — [[Pancaratra]], S'aiva and S'akta. A very curious conventionality is found to have been used in the [[Agamas]], viz., of designating BTjaksaras, by the names of certain [[trees]]; as for example, “Join [[Mandara]] with {{Wiki|Visnu}}”. Here “[[Mandara]]” would be ordinarily understood to mean the [[Mandara]] [[tree]] but such an |
− | explanation will be found not to have been borne by the context. It means that the BTjaksaras called “ra” should be added to Visnu BTjaksaras ' a', and should be pronounced “ara”. This is given here as an illustration to show how the mere wording of the text of Mantras'astras is apt to be misunderstood, and why such a thing as initiation into them is necessary. Such sorts of examples have collected and explained as far as the materials could be obtained, and will also be found in the appendix. This sort of finding out the mantras is called Mantroddhara. Among the uses of BTjaksaras, may be mentioned the placing of certain BTjaksaras in the beginning of the verses composed. A poet, for instance, | + | explanation will be found not to have been borne by the context. It means that the BTjaksaras called “ra” should be added to {{Wiki|Visnu}} BTjaksaras ' a', and should be pronounced “ara”. This is given here as an illustration to show how the mere wording of the text of Mantras'astras is apt to be misunderstood, and why such a thing as [[initiation]] into them is necessary. Such sorts of examples have collected and explained as far as the materials could be obtained, and will also be found in the appendix. This sort of finding out the [[mantras]] is called [[Mantroddhara]]. Among the uses of BTjaksaras, may be mentioned the placing of certain BTjaksaras in the beginning of the verses composed. A poet, for instance, |
− | and in this case he must be a good adept, wishing to destroy a house or anything belonging to another person, sings a song beginning with one of the Agni or fire BTjaksaras and [Page 23] which means that the house should be burnt. Cases of this sort have occurred, but they all depend on the occult powers conquered by the composer. Kalidasa and several others are said to have done so. Similarly good may be done to anyone. But as the tendency in those who are not Brahmajnanins, is to do more harm than good, such things should be discountenanced as far as possible. | + | and in this case he must be a good {{Wiki|adept}}, wishing to destroy a house or anything belonging to another [[person]], sings a song beginning with one of the [[Agni]] or [[fire]] BTjaksaras and [Page 23] which means that the house should be burnt. Cases of this sort have occurred, but they all depend on the [[occult powers]] conquered by the composer. [[Wikipedia:Kālidāsa|Kalidasa]] and several others are said to have done so. Similarly good may be done to anyone. But as the tendency in those who are not Brahmajnanins, is to do more harm than good, such things should be discountenanced as far as possible. |
− | It must, therefore, be understood that all the mantras which may mean nothing else than the effect required, are not devoid of force whatever. A magician, for instance, wishing to purify the magnetic aura of a chair would merely say | + | It must, therefore, be understood that all the [[mantras]] which may mean nothing else than the effect required, are not devoid of force whatever. A [[Wikipedia:Magician(paranormal)|magician]], for instance, wishing to {{Wiki|purify}} the magnetic [[Wikipedia:aura (paranormal)|aura]] of a chair would merely say “[[Ram]] agnaye [[namah]]” fancying or willing himself during the repetition, that [[fire]] purifies the chair, and if he is [[sensitive]], he would [[feel]] that the [[Wikipedia:aura (paranormal)|aura]] surrounding it has been [[purified]]. |
− | As regards the question of relation of mantra, to the force it symbolises, no clear words can be found in the Mantras'astras. Such explanations as when literally translated mean “the devata is of two forms, viz., that of a mantra, and that of the Suksma S'arTra”, occur, but they do not in any way enlighten us. There seems to be a good deal of mystery cast on this question by the Agamas, but judging from their [Page 24] context in the Mantras'astras and from S'amkaracarya 's words in his famous Commentaries on the | + | As regards the question of [[relation]] of [[mantra]], to the force it symbolises, no clear words can be found in the Mantras'astras. Such explanations as when literally translated mean “the [[devata]] is of two [[forms]], viz., that of a [[mantra]], and that of the Suksma S'arTra”, occur, but they do not in any way [[enlighten]] us. There seems to be a good deal of {{Wiki|mystery}} cast on this question by the [[Agamas]], but judging from their [Page 24] context in the Mantras'astras and from S'amkaracarya 's words in his famous Commentaries on the |
− | Brahma Sutras (1.3. 33) that a devata has the power of assuming any form. I think I am not far from right in supposing that the devatas (by whatever name they are called in the Theosophical literature) are denizens of a higher plane of being, but between whom and the sounds there exists some inexplicable relation, and which when once tuned is sure to invoke those denizens, just as in a piano the keys produce the particular tone required. | + | [[Wikipedia:Brahma Sutras|Brahma Sutras]] (1.3. 33) that a [[devata]] has the power of assuming any [[form]]. I think I am not far from right in supposing that the [[devatas]] (by whatever [[name]] they are called in the [[Theosophical]] {{Wiki|literature}}) are denizens of a higher plane of being, but between whom and the {{Wiki|sounds}} there [[exists]] some inexplicable [[relation]], and which when once tuned is sure to invoke those denizens, just as in a piano the keys produce the particular tone required. |
− | Similar cases of intentional secrecy in the case of mantras may be inferred from the fact that the mantras have been specially composed so as not to be of much use when practised as they stand. The mantras are “defective” as they stand, and should be remedied. They are said to be of fifty kinds. Most of these are trivial, but four of these are important. They are known by the names, Chinna, Ruddha, S’aktihTna and Badhira. | + | Similar cases of intentional secrecy in the case of [[mantras]] may be inferred from the fact that the [[mantras]] have been specially composed so as not to be of much use when practised as they stand. The [[mantras]] are “defective” as they stand, and should be remedied. They are said to be of fifty kinds. Most of these are [[trivial]], but four of these are important. They are known by the names, [[Chinna]], Ruddha, S’aktihTna and [[Badhira]]. |
− | Chinna means ' broken' and denotes that defect by which a mantra is known, containing a Vayu BTjaksara (ya) either in the beginning, middle or the end, or containing a double letter (as kma for instance): or containing three, four or five vowels. [Page 25] | + | [[Chinna]] means ' broken' and denotes that defect by which a [[mantra]] is known, containing a {{Wiki|Vayu}} BTjaksara (ya) either in the beginning, middle or the end, or containing a double [[letter]] (as kma for instance): or containing three, four or five {{Wiki|vowels}}. [Page 25] |
Ruddha (retarding) is that defect in which a PrthvTbTja ( la ) occurs twice simultaneously. | Ruddha (retarding) is that defect in which a PrthvTbTja ( la ) occurs twice simultaneously. | ||
− | S’aktihTna (powerless) is that in which neither a MayabTja ( T) S'ribTja ( S’ffm ), or Pranava, is to be found in a given mantra. | + | S’aktihTna (powerless) is that in which neither a MayabTja ( T) S'ribTja ( S’ffm ), or [[Pranava]], is to be found in a given [[mantra]]. |
− | Badhira (or deaf) is that in which there is anusvara both in the beginning as well as the end of a mantra. | + | [[Badhira]] (or [[deaf]]) is that in which there is [[anusvara]] both in the beginning as well as the end of a [[mantra]]. |
− | It is also considered a defect in a mantra, if it is composed of a large number of syllables. It quite frequently happens that a mantra cannot be formed without any of the defects: and accordingly there are two opposite schools, one holding that these defects exist with a purpose, and the other that they are only accidental. It follows therefrom that in order to compose, a mantra, a good deal of care has to be exercised against positive evil consequences, as such defects are sure to produce little or none of the intended results. It will also be seen that those mantras which are either the least defective or not defective at all, are those composed by the highest adepts spoken of in Samskrt writings, and I may add that they are, as a rule, written in Agamas in a cypher, thus necessitating a real initiation into it. | + | It is also considered a defect in a [[mantra]], if it is composed of a large number of {{Wiki|syllables}}. It quite frequently happens that a [[mantra]] cannot be formed without any of the defects: and accordingly there are two opposite schools, one holding that these defects [[exist]] with a {{Wiki|purpose}}, and the other that they are only accidental. It follows therefrom that in order to compose, a [[mantra]], a good deal of [[care]] has to be exercised against positive [[evil]] {{Wiki|consequences}}, as such defects are sure to produce little or none of the intended results. It will also be seen that those [[mantras]] which are either the least defective or not defective at all, are those composed by the [[highest]] {{Wiki|adepts}} spoken of in Samskrt writings, and I may add that they are, as a {{Wiki|rule}}, written in [[Agamas]] in a cypher, thus necessitating a real [[initiation]] into it. |
− | These defects should be remedied, and such remedies are ten in number known by the name [Page 26] of “Das'a | + | These defects should be remedied, and such remedies are ten in number known by the [[name]] [Page 26] of “Das'a [[Samskaras]]”. They are [[Janana]], JTvana; Tadana, Bodhana, [[Abhiseka]], VimalTkarana, Apyayana, [[Tarpana]], DTpana and Gopana. |
− | Janana, literally | + | [[Janana]], literally “[[birth]]”, is the process of separating the letters of a [[mantra]] from a diagram previously drawn, and of {{Wiki|concentrating}} the will thereon; this process is said to intensify the [[action]] of a [[mantra]]. JTvana or “[[protection]]” is the process of regenerating, and this is done by performing the [[Japa]] of a [[mantra]], preceded and followed by the [[Pranava]]. |
− | Tadana (beating) is that process of writing the mantra on the bhurjapatra (birch leaf), and after concentrating one's mind on it for a certain length of time, invoking in short the force indicated by the mantra: and then awakening it by making some magnetic passes on the writing, with a drug favourable for awakening the force, such as sandal paste. | + | Tadana (beating) is that process of [[writing]] the [[mantra]] on the bhurjapatra (birch leaf), and after {{Wiki|concentrating}} one's [[mind]] on it for a certain length of time, invoking in short the force indicated by the [[mantra]]: and then [[awakening]] it by making some magnetic passes on the [[writing]], with a {{Wiki|drug}} favourable for [[awakening]] the force, such as sandal paste. |
− | Bodhana is that process in which the devata is after being roused induced to a proper understanding; and this peculiar result is brought about by the throwing of the flowers of KaravTra (Neriumadorata). In Abhiseka, the devata is made to yield to the wishes of the operator, and this is done by either pouring water mesmerised by the repetition of the four [Page 27] bTjas Om, HrTm, KlTm, Aim, or by throwing the tender leaves of the peepul. | + | Bodhana is that process in which the [[devata]] is after being roused induced to a proper [[understanding]]; and this peculiar result is brought about by the throwing of the [[flowers]] of KaravTra (Neriumadorata). In [[Abhiseka]], the [[devata]] is made to yield to the wishes of the operator, and this is done by either pouring [[water]] mesmerised by the repetition of the four [Page 27] bTjas Om, HrTm, KlTm, Aim, or by throwing the tender leaves of the peepul. |
− | While the processes above described are for the purpose of restoring the devata to its proper senses so far as the individual operator is concerned, the defects in the mantra, and the devata are, strictly speaking, remedied in the last three ones, beginning from VimalTkarana, which literally means “getting rid of strain”, It is done by making a Japa of the mantra, preceded, and followed, by the words Hamsa and Soham, respectively, and then mesmerising water by plunging a blade of sacred grass into it, while the mantra is being repeated; this letter process being known by the name of Apyayana, that is equalizing the good and evil actions of the devata. To attain this result another ceremony is gone through, viz., Tarpana, which is pouring over the bhurjapatra on which the mantra is written, mesmerised milk, and clarified butter, mixed with ghee and the mesmerised water just described. The next step, therefore, is that of stimulating the devata, so that the required result, viz., a command over it, may be sooner accomplished. This is done by DTpana, and Gopana. In the former the BTjas (Om, Im, Sam ) are added to the mantra and repeated [Page 28] a certain number of times; the BTjas added thereto, being very powerful ones; and the letter is nothing but a careful preservation to oneself of the secret ceremonies performed all the while. | + | While the {{Wiki|processes}} above described are for the {{Wiki|purpose}} of restoring the [[devata]] to its proper [[senses]] so far as the {{Wiki|individual}} operator is concerned, the defects in the [[mantra]], and the [[devata]] are, strictly {{Wiki|speaking}}, remedied in the last three ones, beginning from VimalTkarana, which literally means “getting rid of strain”, It is done by making a [[Japa]] of the [[mantra]], preceded, and followed, by the words {{Wiki|Hamsa}} and Soham, respectively, and then mesmerising [[water]] by plunging a blade of [[sacred]] grass into it, while the [[mantra]] is being repeated; this [[letter]] process being known by the [[name]] of Apyayana, that is equalizing the [[good and evil]] [[actions]] of the [[devata]]. To attain this result another {{Wiki|ceremony}} is gone through, viz., [[Tarpana]], which is pouring over the bhurjapatra on which the [[mantra]] is written, mesmerised milk, and clarified butter, mixed with ghee and the mesmerised [[water]] just described. The next step, therefore, is that of stimulating the [[devata]], so that the required result, viz., a command over it, may be sooner accomplished. This is done by DTpana, and Gopana. In the former the BTjas (Om, Im, Sam ) are added to the [[mantra]] and repeated [Page 28] a certain number of times; the BTjas added thereto, being very powerful ones; and the [[letter]] is nothing but a careful preservation to oneself of the secret {{Wiki|ceremonies}} performed all the while. |
− | There is however one important thing. I would call it the most important factor in the practice of mantras and that is, the law of correspondences of several principles to each other. I need not for obvious reasons set myself to explain them in any way but would leave the subject to be dealt with by my readers according to the lights they have had. But as I expended a great labour in finding them out from the Mantras'astras and other writings, I shall simply enumerate them in an appendix hereafter. [Page 29] | + | There is however one important thing. I would call it the most important factor in the practice of [[mantras]] and that is, the law of correspondences of several {{Wiki|principles}} to each other. I need not for obvious [[reasons]] set myself to explain them in any way but would leave the [[subject]] to be dealt with by my readers according to the lights they have had. But as I expended a great labour in finding them out from the Mantras'astras and other writings, I shall simply enumerate them in an appendix hereafter. [Page 29] |
Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
− | PURAS'CARANA as applied to the practice of mantras means that act or a series of acts which should be performed as soon as one is initiated. They are japa, homa, tarpana, marjana, and charity. These are called the five angas to the practice of mantra. | + | PURAS'CARANA as applied to the practice of [[mantras]] means that act or a series of acts which should be performed as soon as one is [[initiated]]. They are [[japa]], [[homa]], [[tarpana]], marjana, and [[charity]]. These are called the five [[angas]] to the practice of [[mantra]]. |
− | Before one begins to practise it, it is absolutely necessary that he should find out whether he will In any way be benefited, in other words, whether his Karma is such as to prevent his being benefited at all by the practice of a mantra in that birth in which he wishes to obtain the result in view. This shows that nothing in the world can work against the natural law known to Hindus under the general name of | + | Before one begins to practise it, it is absolutely necessary that he should find out whether he will In any way be benefited, in other words, whether his [[Karma]] is such as to prevent his being benefited at all by the practice of a [[mantra]] in that [[birth]] in which he wishes to obtain the result in view. This shows that nothing in the [[world]] can work against the {{Wiki|natural law}} known to [[Hindus]] under the general [[name]] of |
− | + | “[[Karma]]”. Even [[Vidyaranya]] when he wanted [[wealth]] and [[prosperity]] had recourse to the practice of Gayattri, but it was all of no use. He at last, performed those {{Wiki|ceremonies}} which go to destroy the [[action]] of the [[devata]] of a [[mantra]] after it is found useless. This [[action]] of Vidyaranya's certainly evoked at last the [Page 30] [[devata]] of the Gayattri, who is said to have told him that he could not obtain the required result in that [[birth]], as his [[Karma]] in his previous [[birth]] was such as not to entitle him to any such reward. He, therefore, renounced the [[life]] of a [[householder]] and turned out a Samnyasin, as the [[life]] of an [[ascetic]] is considered by the S'astras as a kind of second [[birth]], in which one should try his | |
− | best to forget everything he previously enjoyed, and even his own name: for this purpose, Hindus take a new name after they renounce a house-holder's duties. It was only after Vidyaranya became a Samnyasin that he was appointed Prime Minister to the King, and was virtually rolling in wealth. We need not question the basis on which the above account stands. It is quite sufficient for our present purpose to see, that granting it to be true, it conveys a good deal of meaning; it illustrates in short the law enunciated above. | + | best to forget everything he previously enjoyed, and even his [[own]] [[name]]: for this {{Wiki|purpose}}, [[Hindus]] take a new [[name]] after they {{Wiki|renounce}} a house-holder's duties. It was only after [[Vidyaranya]] became a Samnyasin that he was appointed [[Prime Minister]] to the [[King]], and was virtually rolling in [[wealth]]. We need not question the basis on which the above account stands. It is quite sufficient for our {{Wiki|present}} {{Wiki|purpose}} to see, that granting it to be true, it conveys a good deal of meaning; it illustrates in short the law enunciated above. |
− | For purposes of finding out whether Karma allows one to be benefited by the practice of a mantra, recourse should be had to Astrology , from which it should be found out whether at the particular period in which work is commenced or during his life-time he may have control over the mantra in [Page 31] question. If it is found out from his horoscope that he would control it, he may set himself to work, but not; if otherwise. Granting that it is in his favour, he should then solve the same problem by having recourse to the mantra itself. The object of this problem is to find out whether one should perform the Japa, etc., of a mantra a greater number of times or a less number of times than is usually | + | For purposes of finding out whether [[Karma]] allows one to be benefited by the practice of a [[mantra]], recourse should be had to [[Astrology]] , from which it should be found out whether at the particular period in which work is commenced or during his [[life-time]] he may have control over the [[mantra]] in [Page 31] question. If it is found out from his [[horoscope]] that he would control it, he may set himself to work, but not; if otherwise. Granting that it is in his favour, he should then solve the same problem by having recourse to the [[mantra]] itself. The [[object]] of this problem is to find out whether one should perform the [[Japa]], etc., of a [[mantra]] a greater number of times or a less number of times than is usually |
− | accorded to it, in short, to see whether he had, in his past birth practised it, and with what result. For, if he had practised it, and he had a command over it, he would now be required to do it a less number of times, but still at the same time he will derive the fullest benefit; therefrom. This is technically called Rnarnibhava, and, is of three kinds. In all of these three, the general process is counting in a sort of way from the first letter of a mantra to the first or the last letter of his own name. One of these ways is to find out, in the order of the Samskrt Alphabet, how many letters come between the first letter of the mantra, and the first letter of the name of the intending practiser; then multiply this number by 3, and divide by 7, and the remainder will be what the mantra “owes” him. [Page 32] | + | accorded to it, in short, to see whether he had, in his {{Wiki|past}} [[birth]] practised it, and with what result. For, if he had practised it, and he had a command over it, he would now be required to do it a less number of times, but still at the same time he will derive the fullest [[benefit]]; therefrom. This is technically called Rnarnibhava, and, is of three kinds. In all of these three, the general process is counting in a sort of way from the first [[letter]] of a [[mantra]] to the first or the last [[letter]] of his [[own]] [[name]]. One of these ways is to find out, in the order of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]], how many letters come between the first [[letter]] of the [[mantra]], and the first [[letter]] of the [[name]] of the intending practiser; then multiply this number by 3, and divide by 7, and the remainder will be what the [[mantra]] “owes” him. [Page 32] |
− | Then count from the first letter of the name of the practiser, to the first letter of the mantra, multiply this number by 7, and divide the product by three, the remainder is what he owes the mantra. To explain this let me take an illustration. Suppose the first letter of a mantra is and suppose at the same time that the first letter of the name of the intending practiser when transliterated into Samskrt is H. Counting from to H we have three letters, multiplying this number by three and dividing by seven, we have remainder 2. This shows that the mantra owes him two parts. Then continuing the same illustration, count from to ^ , we have 49 letters; multiplying this by seven, and dividing | + | Then count from the first [[letter]] of the [[name]] of the practiser, to the first [[letter]] of the [[mantra]], multiply this number by 7, and divide the product by three, the remainder is what he owes the [[mantra]]. To explain this let me take an illustration. Suppose the first [[letter]] of a [[mantra]] is and suppose at the same time that the first [[letter]] of the [[name]] of the intending practiser when transliterated into Samskrt is H. Counting from to H we have three letters, multiplying this number by three and dividing by seven, we have remainder 2. This shows that the [[mantra]] owes him two parts. Then continuing the same illustration, count from to ^ , we have 49 letters; multiplying this by seven, and dividing |
− | the product by three, we have the remainder 1. Adding 1 and 2 we have a total three, and this means that the person whose name begins with ^should, in case of practising a mantra beginning with , perform Japa and other ceremonies over again half the number of times the number generally laid down for them. | + | the product by three, we have the remainder 1. Adding 1 and 2 we have a total three, and this means that the [[person]] whose [[name]] begins with ^should, in case of practising a [[mantra]] beginning with , perform [[Japa]] and other {{Wiki|ceremonies}} over again half the number of times the number generally laid down for them. |
− | The other method is drawing a figure of 63 squares. In the top-most row the first 9 numerals should be written in the ascending order, and in the lower-most, the same in the [Page 33] descending order. In the tO M five intermediate rows, all the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet from should be written in their | + | The other method is drawing a figure of 63 squares. In the top-most row the first 9 numerals should be written in the ascending order, and in the lower-most, the same in the [Page 33] descending order. In the tO M five [[intermediate]] rows, all the letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]] from should be written in their |
− | natural order, omitting as in the diagram given below. | + | {{Wiki|natural order}}, omitting as in the diagram given below. |
− | Here again let us suppose that the mantra intended to be practised begins with and the first letter of the intending practiser's name is H ; and counting from to H we have three letters. The top-most row of figures denote those relating to the mantra, while the lower-most are those relating to the person. Such being the case, we should, in order to find out by how [Page 34] much the mantra “is due”, multiply the number three by four, that being the figure which is right above the first letter of the mantra, and we obtain the product twelve. Dividing this product by six, that being the figure straight below it in the lower most row, we have no remainder, and this means that the mantra is in no way “due to” the person. If the same process is reversed and the necessary arithmetical trial operations undergone; we have a remainder 2. This shows that the performer should perform the Japa of a mantra twice the number of times usually allotted to it. | + | Here again let us suppose that the [[mantra]] intended to be practised begins with and the first [[letter]] of the intending practiser's [[name]] is H ; and counting from to H we have three letters. The top-most row of figures denote those relating to the [[mantra]], while the lower-most are those relating to the [[person]]. Such being the case, we should, in order to find out by how [Page 34] much the [[mantra]] “is due”, multiply the number three by four, that being the figure which is right above the first [[letter]] of the [[mantra]], and we obtain the product twelve. Dividing this product by six, that being the figure straight below it in the lower most row, we have no remainder, and this means that the [[mantra]] is in no way “due to” the [[person]]. If the same process is reversed and the necessary arithmetical trial operations undergone; we have a remainder 2. This shows that the performer should perform the [[Japa]] of a [[mantra]] twice the number of times usually allotted to it. |
− | There is a third method which consists in certain arithmetical operations with regard to the total numbers of letters of the mantra, and the person. But as this is very tedious, and I run the risk of making this already technical subject all the more tedious, I shall for the present omit it. Those who are anxious to know something about it will find it described in greater detail in Mantraratnamahodadhi. | + | There is a third method which consists in certain arithmetical operations with regard to the total numbers of letters of the [[mantra]], and the [[person]]. But as this is very tedious, and I run the [[risk]] of making this already technical [[subject]] all the more tedious, I shall for the {{Wiki|present}} omit it. Those who are anxious to know something about it will find it described in greater detail in Mantraratnamahodadhi. |
− | I have been using all the while, the expressions “due to | + | I have been using all the while, the {{Wiki|expressions}} “due to [[mantra]]”, and “due by [[mantra]]”. These were intended to mean the relations which [[exist]] in [[nature]] between the [[person]], and the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]]. While his [[horoscope]] reveals the [[relation]] of the {{Wiki|individual}} to the [Page 35] practice of [[mantras]] in general, the above [[methods]] refer entirely to the [[devatas]] presiding over {{Wiki|individual}} [[mantras]], and the [[person]] who intends to practise them. |
− | There are again other methods such as Sidharicakras or squares in which the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet are arranged in particulars, and thus the relation of the devata of the mantra to the individual is traced, but I now omit them for want of space. By the aid of these methods, one is enabled, to find out what sort of mantras will benefit him. He then, finds out what sort of relation exists between himself and the devata as judged by the constellation under which he was born, and the elements surrounding him, and thereby the powers presiding over those elements. | + | There are again other [[methods]] such as Sidharicakras or squares in which the letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]] are arranged in particulars, and thus the [[relation]] of the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]] to the {{Wiki|individual}} is traced, but I now omit them for want of [[space]]. By the aid of these [[methods]], one is enabled, to find out what sort of [[mantras]] will [[benefit]] him. He then, finds out what sort of [[relation]] [[exists]] between himself and the [[devata]] as judged by the [[constellation]] under which he was born, and the [[elements]] surrounding him, and thereby the [[powers]] presiding over those [[elements]]. |
− | The next thing to be done is the selection of a good day for the purpose, but before this comes the initiation into the mantra itself by a competent Guru, who should have a complete control over the devata of the mantra, which is known in Mantras'astras as Mantrasiddhi. The Guru should on the day of initiation worship the devata of the mantra, by concentrating the force denoted by the mantra in a pot, already filled with water and in which the five best gems, viz., diamond, ruby, sapphire, [Page 36] emerald and cat's-eye are placed. The Guru should then make in the presence of the disciple, 100 offerings to fire by ghee generally, although special oils are considered favourable in the case of special mantras. He should then fill another small vessel with water and after covering it with the palm of his right hand, the Guru should repeat the mantra 800 times, and bathe the candidate with the water; the vessel should then be placed aside and the mantra pronounced in his ear. This completes initiation, and a portion of the force generated in the Guru by his control over the devata of the mantra he is to initiate into, is thus transformed by the same method as we find in the case of modern mesmerists: and you thus see that as has been frequently and truly remarked by our President-Founder mesmeric methods of mahipulation form the A. B. C. of all occult practices. | + | The next thing to be done is the selection of a good day for the {{Wiki|purpose}}, but before this comes the [[initiation]] into the [[mantra]] itself by a competent [[Guru]], who should have a complete control over the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]], which is known in Mantras'astras as Mantrasiddhi. The [[Guru]] should on the day of [[initiation]] {{Wiki|worship}} the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]], by {{Wiki|concentrating}} the force denoted by the [[mantra]] in a pot, already filled with [[water]] and in which the five best [[gems]], viz., [[diamond]], {{Wiki|ruby}}, {{Wiki|sapphire}}, [Page 36] {{Wiki|emerald}} and cat's-eye are placed. The [[Guru]] should then make in the presence of the [[disciple]], 100 [[offerings]] to [[fire]] by ghee generally, although special oils are considered favourable in the case of special [[mantras]]. He should then fill another small vessel with [[water]] and after covering it with the palm of his right hand, the [[Guru]] should repeat the [[mantra]] 800 times, and bathe the candidate with the [[water]]; the vessel should then be placed aside and the [[mantra]] pronounced in his {{Wiki|ear}}. This completes [[initiation]], and a portion of the force generated in the [[Guru]] by his control over the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]] he is to [[initiate]] into, is thus [[transformed]] by the same method as we find in the case of {{Wiki|modern}} mesmerists: and you thus see that as has been frequently and truly remarked by our President-Founder mesmeric [[methods]] of mahipulation [[form]] the A. B. C. of all [[occult]] practices. |
− | It is now the turn of the disciple to practise the mantra. Special months are selected for the purpose. The month of Vais'akha (May-June) is very favourable, to the production of early results, so also are As'vina, and Karttika months (October-November, and November-December); of a more doubtful nature are those of Phalguna (March - April), Margas'ira [Page 37] (December - January), Jyestha (June); less beneficial still are Asadha (July), S'ravana (August - September), and Magha (February); while the remaining months should always be avoided. The full-moon day, the second, fifth to seventh, the tenth, the twelfth, and the thirteenth days are good ones. The Moon being more connected with these matters, any mantra practised during these days in that half of waxing Moon will be productive of worldly comforts; but if on the corresponding days of the waning Moon, it will be more productive of spiritual bliss. The other days, unless in special cases, should be entirely avoided. Special periods again, such as the sixth day of either of the halves in the month of Bhadrapada (September - October), the thirteenth day of the waning half in the month of As'vina (October - November), the ninth day of the bright half of Karttika (November - December), the first day of the dark-half of S'ravana (August - September) are held to be very sacred. They are in fact called Devaparvans, days sacred to the devas. Of the days of the week, Tuesday is attended with loss, Saturday with death, and Monday in the dark-half of a month with no use; the rest are good ones. Of the constellations As'vinT, RohinT, Hasta, Svati, Vis'akha, Jyestha, Uttarasadha. | + | It is now the turn of the [[disciple]] to practise the [[mantra]]. Special months are selected for the {{Wiki|purpose}}. The month of Vais'akha (May-June) is very favourable, to the production of early results, so also are As'vina, and [[Karttika]] months (October-November, and November-December); of a more [[doubtful]] [[nature]] are those of [[Phalguna]] (March - April), Margas'ira [Page 37] (December - January), [[Jyestha]] (June); less beneficial still are Asadha (July), S'ravana (August - September), and [[Magha]] (February); while the remaining months should always be avoided. The [[full-moon day]], the second, fifth to seventh, the tenth, the twelfth, and the thirteenth days are good ones. The [[Moon]] being more connected with these matters, any [[mantra]] practised during these days in that half of waxing [[Moon]] will be {{Wiki|productive}} of [[worldly]] comforts; but if on the [[corresponding]] days of the waning [[Moon]], it will be more {{Wiki|productive}} of [[spiritual]] [[bliss]]. The other days, unless in special cases, should be entirely avoided. Special periods again, such as the sixth day of either of the halves in the month of [[Bhadrapada]] (September - October), the thirteenth day of the waning half in the month of As'vina (October - November), the ninth day of the bright half of [[Karttika]] (November - December), the first day of the dark-half of S'ravana (August - September) are held to be very [[sacred]]. They are in fact called Devaparvans, days [[sacred]] to the [[devas]]. Of the days of the [[week]], [[Tuesday]] is attended with loss, [[Saturday]] with [[death]], and Monday in the dark-half of a month with no use; the rest are good ones. Of the [[constellations]] As'vinT, RohinT, Hasta, [[Svati]], Vis'akha, [[Jyestha]], [[Uttarasadha]]. |
− | Uttarabhadra, [Page 38] and UttaraphalgunT are the best. If the day is an eclipse day, none of these need be observed. A mantra should be remedied of the various defects mentioned in the foregoing section, and the “ten | + | Uttarabhadra, [Page 38] and UttaraphalgunT are the best. If the day is an [[eclipse]] day, none of these need be observed. A [[mantra]] should be remedied of the various defects mentioned in the foregoing section, and the “ten [[arts]]” also therein referred to should be performed. |
− | One should fast the day previous to the day of practice, probably to enable him to concentrate his attention better on the mantra. On the day fixed, he should resolve within himself not to leave the place or village in which he is put up, until the practice is over, as, also to avoid sexual intercourse, oil bath, studying other subjects, vain talk, midday meal, etc., abstinence from all of which tend to improve the psychical part of the person, and to enable him to concentrate his attention better. Until this practice is over, he should rise early in the mornings and perform all the duties involved upon him. The next thing to be done is the ordinary puja or worship, but done as a special accompaniment to his practice. He should then draw the figure of a tortoise, in which should be written the various letters of the Samskrt Alphabet in a certain way; and on that part of the figure where the head is drawn he should take his seat. The following is the figure: [Page 39] | + | One should fast the day previous to the day of practice, probably to enable him to [[concentrate]] his [[attention]] better on the [[mantra]]. On the day fixed, he should resolve within himself not to leave the place or village in which he is put up, until the practice is over, as, also to avoid {{Wiki|sexual}} intercourse, oil bath, studying other [[subjects]], vain talk, midday meal, etc., [[abstinence]] from all of which tend to improve the psychical part of the [[person]], and to enable him to [[concentrate]] his [[attention]] better. Until this practice is over, he should rise early in the mornings and perform all the duties involved upon him. The next thing to be done is the ordinary [[puja]] or {{Wiki|worship}}, but done as a special accompaniment to his practice. He should then draw the figure of a [[tortoise]], in which should be written the various letters of the Samskrt [[Alphabet]] in a certain way; and on that part of the figure where the head is drawn he should take his seat. The following is the figure: [Page 39] |
− | [Page 40] The number of times a mantra should be repeated is regulated as regards each. The best way is by counting the fingers, although beads are also recommended, but not quite necessary. Out of the number of times one repeats his mantra in Japa, he should make one-tenth the number to each of the following: homa (offerings), tarpana, marjana, bathing and food to Brahmanas. This last, and in fact all the essentials, are necessary only in the case of the more powerful mantras, but not for the lesser ones, such as the inferior devatas. As for the substances required for homa, palas'a flower (Butea frondosa) is necessary, if the object is to obtain knowledge; if for Brahma - tejas, or increasing his aura, As'vattha branches; if for increase of age, darbha (the common grass); if anxious of sovereignty, cooked rice and ghee exclusively; cracked rice will bring success in love; bilva leaves bring on fame; Putran3jTvi seeds will induce fertility; if sesamum seeds are used, the cure of sickness results; and if flowers of any kind, prosperity. | + | [Page 40] The number of times a [[mantra]] should be repeated is regulated as regards each. The best way is by counting the fingers, although [[beads]] are also recommended, but not quite necessary. Out of the number of times one repeats his [[mantra]] in [[Japa]], he should make one-tenth the number to each of the following: [[homa]] ([[offerings]]), [[tarpana]], marjana, bathing and [[food]] to [[Brahmanas]]. This last, and in fact all the [[essentials]], are necessary only in the case of the more powerful [[mantras]], but not for the lesser ones, such as the {{Wiki|inferior}} [[devatas]]. As for the {{Wiki|substances}} required for [[homa]], palas'a [[flower]] ({{Wiki|Butea frondosa}}) is necessary, if the [[object]] is to obtain [[knowledge]]; if for [[Brahma]] - [[tejas]], or increasing his [[Wikipedia:aura (paranormal)|aura]], As'vattha branches; if for increase of age, darbha (the common grass); if anxious of {{Wiki|sovereignty}}, cooked {{Wiki|rice}} and ghee exclusively; cracked {{Wiki|rice}} will bring [[success]] in [[love]]; [[bilva]] leaves bring on [[fame]]; Putran3jTvi [[seeds]] will induce {{Wiki|fertility}}; if [[sesamum]] [[seeds]] are used, the cure of [[sickness]] results; and if [[flowers]] of any kind, [[prosperity]]. |
− | For Tarpana, a little quantity of milk and ghee may be mixed with water, and the mixture let down through the fingers, each time the mantra is repeated the particular [Page 41] mantra being followed by the word | + | For [[Tarpana]], a little {{Wiki|quantity}} of milk and ghee may be mixed with [[water]], and the mixture let down through the fingers, each time the [[mantra]] is repeated the particular [Page 41] [[mantra]] being followed by the [[word]] “[[Svaha]]”, while being so repeated. |
− | Marjana is the sprinkling oneself by water while a mantra is being repeated. A pot or vessel is filled with water mixed with a little milk while the practiser takes a blade of darbha grass and by it sprinkles on his head the water in the vessel, invoking mentally the devata of the mantra. In feeding Brahmanas he should similarly invoke the devata in each individual Brahmana thus fed. | + | Marjana is the sprinkling oneself by [[water]] while a [[mantra]] is being repeated. A pot or vessel is filled with [[water]] mixed with a little milk while the practiser takes a blade of [[darbha grass]] and by it sprinkles on his head the [[water]] in the vessel, invoking [[mentally]] the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]]. In feeding [[Brahmanas]] he should similarly invoke the [[devata]] in each {{Wiki|individual}} [[Brahmana]] thus fed. |
− | He should take his meals in the evening, eating just sufficient to keep his body and soul together; and all sorts of rich food should be altogether avoided. | + | He should take his meals in the evening, eating just sufficient to keep his [[body]] and [[soul]] together; and all sorts of rich [[food]] should be altogether avoided. |
− | After all this is performed for the number of days fixed for each mantra, he is said to have obtained that power of controlling the devata of the mantra, this state being known as mantra-siddhi, presentiments of which will be found in dreams. It is only after one becomes a complete master of a mantra, that he can have recourse to any of the eight actions spoken of in the first section. | + | After all this is performed for the number of days fixed for each [[mantra]], he is said to have obtained that power of controlling the [[devata]] of the [[mantra]], this [[state]] being known as [[mantra-siddhi]], presentiments of which will be found in [[dreams]]. It is only after one becomes a complete [[master]] of a [[mantra]], that he can have recourse to any of the eight [[actions]] spoken of in the first section. |
− | I cannot but conclude this section with a warning to one and all of our brothers and sisters not to be led away by what I have here given out and set themselves to practise. [Page 42] These are general rules no doubt applicable to most of the mantras, but care must be taken to see if the particular mantra you wish to practise has any special mode of performance laid down in Mantras'astras. I need not touch the question of knowing it through a proper Guru, for certain evil effects resulting from any unintentional omission in any of the ceremonies above described can only be best averted by one, who has had a practical experience, and such a person is the Guru. [Page 43] | + | I cannot but conclude this section with a warning to one and all of our brothers and sisters not to be led away by what I have here given out and set themselves to practise. [Page 42] These are general {{Wiki|rules}} no [[doubt]] applicable to most of the [[mantras]], but [[care]] must be taken to see if the particular [[mantra]] you wish to practise has any special mode of performance laid down in Mantras'astras. I need not {{Wiki|touch}} the question of [[knowing]] it through a proper [[Guru]], for certain [[evil]] effects resulting from any unintentional omission in any of the {{Wiki|ceremonies}} above described can only be best averted by one, who has had a {{Wiki|practical}} [[experience]], and such a [[person]] is the [[Guru]]. [Page 43] |
Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
− | THE Tantras or Agamas [The terms Tantra and Agama are here loosely used. The expression. | + | THE [[Tantras]] or [[Agamas]] [The terms [[Tantra]] and [[Agama]] are here loosely used. The expression. ‘[[Tantra]]' has been said in the Kamikagama, to apply to, that work which speaks of the twenty-four [[subjects]], viz., |
− | (1) the nature of Brahman, (2) Brahma- Vidya the science of knowing Brahman, (3) The names of the Agamas and Tantras. (4) Creation and destruction of the world, (5) Astronomy, (6) The sixteen mystical diagrams called Cakras which are auxiliary to the practice of mantras. (7) Mantras, (8) on the uses of Mantras, (9) Yantras. (10) Worship of the special deity about whom the work treats, (11)The ways of people in the four yugas, (12) Origin of devas, (13) Creation and destruction of universe, (14) Holy rivers; (15) Duties of different castes, (16) Old traditions, (17) Sacred days in a year, (18) Pure and impure objects, (19) Elements in nature, (20) Secret virtues of herbs, (21) Elements in nature, etc.. | + | (1) the [[nature]] of [[Brahman]], (2) [[Brahma]]- [[Vidya]] the [[science]] of [[knowing]] [[Brahman]], (3) The names of the [[Agamas]] and [[Tantras]]. (4) Creation and destruction of the [[world]], (5) {{Wiki|Astronomy}}, (6) The sixteen [[mystical]] diagrams called [[Cakras]] which are auxiliary to the practice of [[mantras]]. (7) [[Mantras]], (8) on the uses of [[Mantras]], (9) [[Yantras]]. (10) {{Wiki|Worship}} of the special [[deity]] about whom the work treats, (11)The ways of [[people]] in the [[four yugas]], (12) Origin of [[devas]], (13) Creation and destruction of [[universe]], (14) {{Wiki|Holy}} [[rivers]]; (15) Duties of different [[castes]], (16) Old [[traditions]], (17) [[Sacred]] days in a year, (18) [[Pure]] and impure [[objects]], (19) [[Elements]] in [[nature]], (20) Secret [[virtues]] of herbs, (21) [[Elements]] in [[nature]], etc.. |
− | Agama is defined to be that which contains only the following, viz., (1) creation; (2) destruction of the universe; (3) nature and use of mantras; (4) nature and worship of devas. | + | [[Agama]] is defined to be that which contains only the following, viz., (1) creation; (2) destruction of the [[universe]]; (3) [[nature]] and use of [[mantras]]; (4) [[nature]] and {{Wiki|worship}} of [[devas]]. |
− | The words Tantra and Agama are, however, generally used as synonyms. It is noteworthy that Amarasimha used the words | + | The words [[Tantra]] and [[Agama]] are, however, generally used as synonyms. It is noteworthy that [[Amarasimha]] used the words ‘[[Agama]]' and ‘[[Tantra]] 'in different significations. But this is no [[reason]] why the writings should call themselves by either of these names may not be more [[ancient]] than [[Amarasimha]]. |
− | The term Yamala is also used as a synonym. It should treat of subjects | + | The term Yamala is also used as a {{Wiki|synonym}}. It should treat of [[subjects]] |
− | (1) creation of the universe; | + | (1) creation of the [[universe]]; |
− | (2) astronomy; (3) daily duties; | + | (2) {{Wiki|astronomy}}; (3) daily duties; |
− | (4) difference of caste; | + | (4) difference of [[caste]]; |
− | (5) Yugas and their nature (S'abdakalpadruma)] which I have explained in the beginning of this paper as the great storehouse of mantras are of three classes: | + | (5) [[Yugas]] and their [[nature]] (S'abdakalpadruma)] which I have explained in the beginning of this paper as the great [[storehouse]] of [[mantras]] are of [[three classes]]: |
− | (1) Pancaratragamas, or those which speak of the worship of Visnu; | + | (1) Pancaratragamas, or those which speak of the {{Wiki|worship}} of {{Wiki|Visnu}}; |
− | (2) S'aivagamas or those which deal with the worship of S'iva; and | + | (2) S'aivagamas or those which deal with the {{Wiki|worship}} of S'iva; and |
− | (3) S'aktagamas, those of S'akti. The first [Page 44] are in 108 samhitas or texts promulgated by seven Rsis [ The term Rsi is used in its literal sense “See-er” or promulgator. Hence Brahma and some others who are not Rsis in the general sense of the term are here so called ] — Brahma, S'iva, Skanda, Gautama, Vasistha, Narada and Kapila. Thus seven schools were formed; but 101 others subsequently taught the doctrine, and this accounts for there being 108 samhitas. They are as given below with the number of their S'lokas opposite to them: | + | (3) S'aktagamas, those of S'akti. The first [Page 44] are in [[108]] [[samhitas]] or texts promulgated by seven Rsis [ The term Rsi is used in its literal [[sense]] “See-er” or promulgator. Hence [[Brahma]] and some others who are not Rsis in the general [[sense]] of the term are here so called ] — [[Brahma]], S'iva, [[Skanda]], [[Gautama]], [[Vasistha]], [[Narada]] and [[Kapila]]. Thus seven schools were formed; but 101 others subsequently [[taught]] the [[doctrine]], and this accounts for there being [[108]] [[samhitas]]. They are as given below with the number of their S'lokas opposite to them: |
− | [ The following marked t can be found. For those marked a the authors are unknown. The numbers in case where the sign ? is affixed are not quite correct. In the case of Padmasamhita, one in 1,00,000, is said to exist in the house of a devaloka in Conjeeveram, but I have not seen it. The one I now use is of 10,000 Slokas. It is now being printed in Madras] | + | [ The following marked t can be found. For those marked a the authors are unknown. The numbers in case where the sign ? is affixed are not quite correct. In the case of Padmasamhita, one in 1,00,000, is said to [[exist]] in the house of a [[devaloka]] in Conjeeveram, but I have not seen it. The one I now use is of 10,000 [[Slokas]]. It is now being printed in [[Madras]]] |
Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
(2) Padmodbhava t1,00,000; | (2) Padmodbhava t1,00,000; | ||
(3) Mayavaibhava or Trailokyamohana; | (3) Mayavaibhava or Trailokyamohana; | ||
− | (4) Nalakubara 5,000; | + | (4) [[Nalakubara]] 5,000; |
− | (5) Parama 1,500; t | + | (5) [[Parama]] 1,500; t |
− | (6) Narada 4,000; | + | (6) [[Narada]] 4,000; |
(7) Kanva 7,000; | (7) Kanva 7,000; | ||
(8) Visnu-tilaka 750 (?); | (8) Visnu-tilaka 750 (?); | ||
− | (9) Sanaka 1,500; | + | (9) [[Sanaka]] 1,500; |
− | (10) Arjuna; | + | (10) [[Arjuna]]; |
− | (11) Vasistha 4,500; | + | (11) [[Vasistha]] 4,500; |
(12) Pauskara 4,000 (?); | (12) Pauskara 4,000 (?); | ||
− | (13) Sanatkumara 1,000; | + | (13) [[Sanatkumara]] 1,000; |
− | (14) Satya 1,000; | + | (14) [[Satya]] 1,000; |
(15) S'rTdhara and | (15) S'rTdhara and | ||
(16) Sananda 750; | (16) Sananda 750; | ||
(17) MahT-pras'na; | (17) MahT-pras'na; | ||
(18) Ts'vara 500, | (18) Ts'vara 500, | ||
− | (19) LaksmT -Tantra or S'rT Pras'na, dialogue between Indra and LaksmT 4,000; | + | (19) LaksmT -[[Tantra]] or S'rT Pras'na, {{Wiki|dialogue}} between [[Indra]] and LaksmT 4,000; |
− | (20) Mahendra 2,000; | + | (20) [[Mahendra]] 2,000; |
(21) Purusottama 1,000 (?); | (21) Purusottama 1,000 (?); | ||
(22) Pancapras'na; [Page 45] | (22) Pancapras'na; [Page 45] | ||
(23) Kanva; | (23) Kanva; | ||
− | (24) Mula; | + | (24) [[Mula]]; |
(25) Tatvasagara; | (25) Tatvasagara; | ||
(26) VagTs'a; | (26) VagTs'a; | ||
− | (27) Samvarta 1,000; | + | (27) [[Samvarta]] 1,000; |
(28) Sattvata t250; (29) | (28) Sattvata t250; (29) | ||
Tejodravina a; | Tejodravina a; | ||
(30) Visu Sadbhava; | (30) Visu Sadbhava; | ||
− | (31) Visnu tattva a; | + | (31) {{Wiki|Visnu}} [[tattva]] a; |
(32) Visnu:Siddhanta a; | (32) Visnu:Siddhanta a; | ||
(33) Visnu-vaibhava a; | (33) Visnu-vaibhava a; | ||
(34) Visnu-rahasya; | (34) Visnu-rahasya; | ||
(35 ) Kaumara t 250; | (35 ) Kaumara t 250; | ||
− | (36) Jaya 500; | + | (36) [[Jaya]] 500; |
− | (37) Saura a 150; | + | (37) [[Saura]] a 150; |
− | (38) Bhagavata 150; | + | (38) [[Bhagavata]] 150; |
(39) S'aunaka t200; | (39) S'aunaka t200; | ||
− | (40) Pusti Tantra a; | + | (40) Pusti [[Tantra]] a; |
− | (41) Madhura; | + | (41) [[Madhura]]; |
(42) Upendra; | (42) Upendra; | ||
(43) Yogahrdaya; | (43) Yogahrdaya; | ||
(44) MarTci 100; | (44) MarTci 100; | ||
(45) HarTta t 700; | (45) HarTta t 700; | ||
− | (46) Atreya t 250; | + | (46) [[Atreya]] t 250; |
(47) Parames'vara t 200; | (47) Parames'vara t 200; | ||
− | (48) Daksa 150; | + | (48) [[Daksa]] 150; |
(49) Aus'anasa 250 ; | (49) Aus'anasa 250 ; | ||
− | (50) Vaikhanasa 1,000; | + | (50) [[Vaikhanasa]] 1,000; |
(51) Vihagendra 500; | (51) Vihagendra 500; | ||
(52) Visvaksena t 250; | (52) Visvaksena t 250; | ||
− | (53) Yajnavalkya 250; | + | (53) [[Yajnavalkya]] 250; |
(54) Bhargava 200; | (54) Bhargava 200; | ||
(55) Jamadagnya 150; | (55) Jamadagnya 150; | ||
(56) Paramapurusa 150; | (56) Paramapurusa 150; | ||
− | (57) Gautama 750; | + | (57) [[Gautama]] 750; |
− | (58) Pulastya 150; | + | (58) [[Pulastya]] 150; |
(59) S'akala 200; | (59) S'akala 200; | ||
(60) Jnanarnava 150; | (60) Jnanarnava 150; | ||
(61) Yamya 100; | (61) Yamya 100; | ||
− | (62) Narayana 150; | + | (62) [[Narayana]] 150; |
(63) JTyottara 100; | (63) JTyottara 100; | ||
(64) Jabali 100; | (64) Jabali 100; | ||
(65) Paras'ara 100; | (65) Paras'ara 100; | ||
− | (66) Kapila 250; | + | (66) [[Kapila]] 250; |
− | (67) Vamana 250; | + | (67) [[Vamana]] 250; |
− | (68) Barhaspatya 700 (?) ; | + | (68) [[Barhaspatya]] 700 (?) ; |
(69) Pracetasa; (70) ValmTka; | (69) Pracetasa; (70) ValmTka; | ||
(71) KatyayanTya 250; | (71) KatyayanTya 250; | ||
− | (72) Agastya 500; | + | (72) [[Agastya]] 500; |
− | (73) Jaimini 200; | + | (73) [[Jaimini]] 200; |
(74) Aupagayana; | (74) Aupagayana; | ||
− | (75) Hiranyagarbha; | + | (75) [[Hiranyagarbha]]; |
− | (76) Bodhayana 1,000; | + | (76) [[Bodhayana]] 1,000; |
− | (77) Bharadvaja t 500; | + | (77) [[Bharadvaja]] t 500; |
− | (78) Narasimha; | + | (78) [[Narasimha]]; |
(79) Kas'yapa t l,500; | (79) Kas'yapa t l,500; | ||
(80) Saumya; | (80) Saumya; | ||
(81) Uttaragargya; | (81) Uttaragargya; | ||
(82) S'atatapa; | (82) S'atatapa; | ||
− | (83) Angirasa; | + | (83) [[Angirasa]]; |
− | (84) Yoga 200; | + | (84) [[Yoga]] 200; |
− | (85) Trailokyavijaya, or, Bharata, 200; | + | (85) [[Trailokyavijaya]], or, [[Wikipedia:Bharata (emperor)|Bharata]], 200; |
− | (86) Pingala; | + | (86) [[Pingala]]; |
− | (87) Vitta 150; [Page 46] | + | (87) [[Vitta]] 150; [Page 46] |
− | 88) Varuna 150; | + | 88) {{Wiki|Varuna}} 150; |
(89) Krsnacamara; | (89) Krsnacamara; | ||
(90) Vayavya; | (90) Vayavya; | ||
− | (91) Markandeya t; | + | (91) [[Markandeya]] t; |
(92) Agneya 500; | (92) Agneya 500; | ||
(93) Samhitasamgraha; | (93) Samhitasamgraha; | ||
(94) Mahasanat-kumara; | (94) Mahasanat-kumara; | ||
− | (95) Vyasa; | + | (95) [[Vyasa]]; |
− | (96) Visnu 300; | + | (96) {{Wiki|Visnu}} 300; |
(97) Umamahes'vara t 1,500 (?); | (97) Umamahes'vara t 1,500 (?); | ||
− | (98) Mihira; | + | (98) [[Mihira]]; |
(99) Ahirbudhnya 750; | (99) Ahirbudhnya 750; | ||
(100) Raghava 350 (?); | (100) Raghava 350 (?); | ||
− | (101) Kalki 250; | + | (101) [[Kalki]] 250; |
− | (102) Dattatreya 500; | + | (102) {{Wiki|Dattatreya}} 500; |
(103) S'arva; | (103) S'arva; | ||
(104) Samskarsana 1,500; | (104) Samskarsana 1,500; | ||
− | (105) Pradyumna; | + | (105) {{Wiki|Pradyumna}}; |
− | (106) Varaha; | + | (106) [[Varaha]]; |
(107) S'uka; | (107) S'uka; | ||
− | (108) Kapinjala 2,500.— | + | ([[108]]) Kapinjala 2,500.— |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
Line 443: | Line 443: | ||
− | These writings amount to 400,000, [ The above number is not quite correct; for works that are generally said to be of, say, 250 s'lokas are sometimes found to be an abridgment of a larger work of the same name, and this difficulty is experienced on account of many of the Samhitas being lost. But these remarks do not apply to S'ivagamas for most of the complete sets of the 28 works, I have seen or heard contain the exact number of s'lokas mentioned opposite them in the list given below. Special care should, therefore, be | + | These writings amount to 400,000, [ The above number is not quite correct; for works that are generally said to be of, say, 250 s'lokas are sometimes found to be an {{Wiki|abridgment}} of a larger work of the same [[name]], and this difficulty is [[experienced]] on account of many of the [[Samhitas]] being lost. But these remarks do not apply to S'ivagamas for most of the complete sets of the 28 works, I have seen or heard contain the exact number of s'lokas mentioned opposite them in the list given below. Special [[care]] should, therefore, be |
− | always taken to distinguish abridgments from real Samhitas] — S'lokas. Only those that are marked with t are to be found now-a-days, in the various public and private libraries in India, and elsewhere, as catalogued by the several scholars. From the Pancaratraraksa of Vedantacarya written six centuries ago, we learn that several of these could not be obtained in his days. Most of these, are, however, referred to and even [Page 47] quoted in the writings of Vis'istadvaitins who lived from about the 10th Century down to the present day. Of the 108 text books, the first two are the most important and are generally considered to contain all the more important matters in these writings. Of the | + | always taken to distinguish abridgments from real [[Samhitas]]] — S'lokas. Only those that are marked with t are to be found now-a-days, in the various public and private libraries in [[India]], and elsewhere, as catalogued by the several [[scholars]]. From the Pancaratraraksa of Vedantacarya written six centuries ago, we learn that several of these could not be obtained in his days. Most of these, are, however, referred to and even [Page 47] quoted in the writings of Vis'istadvaitins who lived from about the 10th Century down to the {{Wiki|present}} day. Of the [[108]] text [[books]], the first two are the most important and are generally considered to contain all the more important matters in these writings. Of the |
− | remainder, LaksmT Tantra, Bharata, Ahirbudhnya, and Sattvata Samhitas, are very often spoken of as teaching a system of spirit-communion (S’aranagatT ) which bears a very close resemblance to that practised by the initiates of the Grecian mysteries of old. With very few exceptions like Narada Samhita which is divided into chapters; these writings are generally of four parts or padas, viz., Jnanapada; Yogapada, Kriyapada, and Caryapada. | + | remainder, LaksmT [[Tantra]], [[Wikipedia:Bharata (emperor)|Bharata]], Ahirbudhnya, and Sattvata [[Samhitas]], are very often spoken of as [[teaching]] a system of spirit-communion (S’aranagatT ) which bears a very close resemblance to that practised by the [[initiates]] of the Grecian {{Wiki|mysteries}} of old. With very few exceptions like [[Narada]] [[Samhita]] which is divided into chapters; these writings are generally of [[four parts]] or [[padas]], viz., [[Jnanapada]]; Yogapada, Kriyapada, and Caryapada. |
− | This order is sometimes reversed in some of them and there are others again in which Caryapada alone is dealt with. Their origin according to Mahabharta is given below in an abridged form (S'antiparvan Moksadharma Parvan): | + | This order is sometimes reversed in some of them and there are others again in which Caryapada alone is dealt with. Their origin according to Mahabharta is given below in an abridged [[form]] (S'antiparvan Moksadharma Parvan): |
− | Narada in his wanderings met Narayana Rsi at Badarikas'rama [ Badrinath in the Himalayas. He is an incarnation of Visnu, and taught several mantras. There is, however, another Rsi of the same name who is the author of a code of laws, and referred to by Madhavacarya in his commentary on Paras'ara Smrti ] — and put to him several [Page 48] questions on philosophy and on the origin of the cosmos. The Rsi replied that Brahma was first created and He created the devas, and the Rsis, Atri, Bhrgu, Kutsa, Vasistha, Gautama, | + | [[Narada]] in his wanderings met [[Narayana]] Rsi at Badarikas'rama [ [[Badrinath]] in the [[Himalayas]]. He is an [[incarnation]] of {{Wiki|Visnu}}, and [[taught]] several [[mantras]]. There is, however, another Rsi of the same [[name]] who is the author of a code of laws, and referred to by [[Madhavacarya]] in his commentary on Paras'ara [[Smrti]] ] — and put to him several [Page 48] questions on [[philosophy]] and on the origin of the [[cosmos]]. The Rsi replied that [[Brahma]] was first created and He created the [[devas]], and the Rsis, [[Atri]], [[Bhrgu]], Kutsa, [[Vasistha]], [[Gautama]], |
− | Kas'yapa, Angirasa and MarTci. The doctrines promulgated by them were followed in the Krta Yuga. One of them, Uparicaravas by name, performed a sacrifice in the presence of the abovementioned and several others, with Brhaspati, officiating as priest. The other Rsis assembled soon found that the oblations given by Uparicaravas disappeared, without being received by the Devas as was usually the case. Brhaspati accused him of dishonest motives and offered, to perform the Yajna himself. He then found to his astonishment the disappearance of the oblations, and therefore enquired of the performer as to the reason of such a disappearance. | + | Kas'yapa, [[Angirasa]] and MarTci. The [[doctrines]] promulgated by them were followed in the Krta [[Yuga]]. One of them, Uparicaravas by [[name]], performed a [[Wikipedia:sacrifice|sacrifice]] in the presence of the abovementioned and several others, with [[Brhaspati]], officiating as [[priest]]. The other Rsis assembled soon found that the oblations given by Uparicaravas disappeared, without being received by the [[Devas]] as was usually the case. [[Brhaspati]] accused him of dishonest motives and [[offered]], to perform the [[Yajna]] himself. He then found to his astonishment the [[disappearance]] of the oblations, and therefore enquired of the performer as to the [[reason]] of such a [[disappearance]]. |
− | Uparicarav replied that Narayana received them. The Devas were very much enraged and asked the Rsis to explain how it was that Narayana could be seen by none of them. The Rsi explained by saying that as they were the mind-born sons of Brahma, they alone could see Narayana face to face. They further said that once upon a time they went to S'vetadvTpa to see him. They could see him [Page 49] only after performing a tapas there for a long time. | + | Uparicarav replied that [[Narayana]] received them. The [[Devas]] were very much enraged and asked the Rsis to explain how it was that [[Narayana]] could be seen by none of them. The Rsi explained by saying that as they were the mind-born sons of [[Brahma]], they alone could see [[Narayana]] face to face. They further said that once upon a time they went to S'vetadvTpa to see him. They could see him [Page 49] only after performing a [[tapas]] there for a long time. |
− | Narada hearing this went to S'vetadvTpa near the Mount Meru, and performed a long tapas there and saw Narayana. The latter taught him the great secret that the easiest way of worshipping Him was by means of idols. | + | [[Narada]] hearing this went to S'vetadvTpa near the [[Mount Meru]], and performed a long [[tapas]] there and saw [[Narayana]]. The [[latter]] [[taught]] him the great secret that the easiest way of worshipping Him was by means of {{Wiki|idols}}. |
− | Such is the origin of the Pancaratra Agamas subsequently presented to the world by Narada, then by six other Rsis and afterwards by several others. | + | Such is the origin of the [[Pancaratra]] [[Agamas]] subsequently presented to the [[world]] by [[Narada]], then by six other Rsis and afterwards by several others. |
− | Pancaratra Agamas are so called, because the five kinds of knowledge (Ratra) are taught; viz., (1) general knowledge of realities; (2) knowledge of that by which one will be able to reach the highest goal; (3) knowledge of that by which one will be able to serve Narayana in Vaikuntha; (4) knowledge of that by which one will get, the eight Siddhis; (5) knowledge of the means by which wealth, children, etc., can be obtained. There are also several ways of explaining the expression, but in none of the works, so far as I have seen, is the meaning given out to be “nights” as explained by M. Barth in his | + | [[Pancaratra]] [[Agamas]] are so called, because the five kinds of [[knowledge]] (Ratra) are [[taught]]; viz., (1) general [[knowledge]] of [[realities]]; (2) [[knowledge]] of that by which one will be able to reach the [[highest]] goal; (3) [[knowledge]] of that by which one will be able to serve [[Narayana]] in [[Vaikuntha]]; (4) [[knowledge]] of that by which one will get, the [[eight Siddhis]]; (5) [[knowledge]] of the means by which [[wealth]], children, etc., can be obtained. There are also several ways of explaining the expression, but in none of the works, so far as I have seen, is the meaning given out to be “nights” as explained by M. Barth in his “[[Religions]] of [[India]]”.[ It is further explained in the [[Padma-Samhita]] of [[Pancaratra]] [[Agamas]] that [[Siddhantas]] are so called, because they treat of positive [[knowledge]] leading to [[Narayana]] and best practised by those who are well-versed in the [[Vedas]], and the S'astras such as PurvamTmamsa, etc..] [Page 50] |
− | But this expression is not to be found in any of the works themselves. They call themselves either as Siddbantas (definite conclusions) or Tantras (easy way of doing things) in contradistinction to Mantras, and are so called on account of their containing more of the easier ways of accomplishing things, than by Mantras. | + | But this expression is not to be found in any of the works themselves. They call themselves either as Siddbantas (definite conclusions) or [[Tantras]] (easy way of doing things) in contradistinction to [[Mantras]], and are so called on account of their containing more of the easier ways of accomplishing things, than by [[Mantras]]. |
Line 473: | Line 473: | ||
− | (1) Mantra Siddhantas, those that speak of the Murti, or form of worship in a temple; | + | (1) [[Mantra]] [[Siddhantas]], those that speak of the [[Murti]], or [[form]] of {{Wiki|worship}} in a [[temple]]; |
− | (2) Agama Siddhantas, of four murtis or forms; | + | (2) [[Agama]] [[Siddhantas]], of four [[murtis]] or [[forms]]; |
− | (3) Tantra Siddhanta of nine; | + | (3) [[Tantra]] [[Siddhanta]] of nine; |
− | (4) Tantrantara Siddhanta of three or four-faced forms or idols, whether of Visnu or S'iva. | + | (4) Tantrantara [[Siddhanta]] of three or four-faced [[forms]] or {{Wiki|idols}}, whether of {{Wiki|Visnu}} or S'iva. |
− | These differences arose on account of the particular symbols adopted; and of the Mantra uttered when they are made. The Padmasamhita, for instance, is a Mantra Siddhanta, and it is supposed to have been composed in fifteen millions of s'lokas by Narayana himself, and taught to Brahma, the composer saying that although the true mode of worshipping Him was as described in the Vedas, but that if any easier method was necessary it was by Mantras. Brahma is then said to have condensed it into 500,000 s'lokas and taught it to [Page 51] Kapila Rsi, who in his turn abridged it into 100,000 s'lokas, and initiated Padma, an elephant in Patalaloka, into its mysteries. The Samhita is therefore named after | + | These differences arose on account of the particular [[symbols]] adopted; and of the [[Mantra]] uttered when they are made. The Padmasamhita, for instance, is a [[Mantra]] [[Siddhanta]], and it is supposed to have been composed in fifteen millions of s'lokas by [[Narayana]] himself, and [[taught]] to [[Brahma]], the composer saying that although the true mode of worshipping Him was as described in the [[Vedas]], but that if any easier method was necessary it was by [[Mantras]]. [[Brahma]] is then said to have condensed it into 500,000 s'lokas and [[taught]] it to [Page 51] [[Kapila]] Rsi, who in his turn abridged it into 100,000 s'lokas, and [[initiated]] [[Padma]], an [[elephant]] in [[Patalaloka]], into its {{Wiki|mysteries}}. The [[Samhita]] is therefore named after |
− | the elephant. The elephant again abridged [The dialogue in Padmasamhita is, however, between Visnu and Brahma] — it into 10,000 s'lokas. Samvarta learnt it from Padma and taught it to the world. Kanva was one in the long line of teachers; and the work is strictly speaking that of Kanva and other Rsis. These, as well as S'aivagamas, are divided into Jnana [Jnanayoga —The contemplation described in the Yoga- s'astras with its eight parts, yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dhyana, dharana, and samadhi ] — Yoga, | + | the [[elephant]]. The [[elephant]] again abridged [The {{Wiki|dialogue}} in Padmasamhita is, however, between {{Wiki|Visnu}} and [[Brahma]]] — it into 10,000 s'lokas. [[Samvarta]] learnt it from [[Padma]] and [[taught]] it to the [[world]]. Kanva was one in the long line of [[teachers]]; and the work is strictly {{Wiki|speaking}} that of Kanva and other Rsis. These, as well as S'aivagamas, are divided into [[Jnana]] [Jnanayoga —The contemplation described in the [[Yoga]]- s'astras with its eight parts, [[yama]], [[niyama]], [[asana]], [[pranayama]], [[pratyahara]], [[dhyana]], [[dharana]], and [[samadhi]] ] — [[Yoga]], |
− | Kriya, and Carya padas, or rather sections treating respectively of the nature of Brahmajnana from the Vis'istadvaitic and Advaitic standpoints, adopting the teachings and even the technicalities of the Upanisads of Yoga or the practice of Brahmajnana and its four kinds Jnanayoga, Karmayoga, [Karmayoga is the performance of one's duties, moral and religious, and without any selfinterest in the result after obtaining a knowledge of the realities (Cit, Acit and Ts'vara.) through the Scriptures, and always contemplating it with various kinds of Karma (Vide the S'rT Bhasya of Ramanujacarya, Adhyaya 3, pada 3 ]— and Bhaktiyoga. [ Bhaktiyoga. — This is also called upasana. It is the contemplation of the Brahman with its various qualities, and attributes, without any interruption whatever, throughout one's whole life; at the same time discharging his duties to the best of his ability ] — The last forms the principal [Page 52] subject of this work and is considered easier than either the Jnana or Karmayogas, and is therefore recommended to those | + | [[Kriya]], and [[Carya]] [[padas]], or rather [[sections]] treating respectively of the [[nature]] of [[Brahmajnana]] from the Vis'istadvaitic and [[Advaitic]] standpoints, adopting the teachings and even the technicalities of the [[Upanisads]] of [[Yoga]] or the practice of [[Brahmajnana]] and its four kinds Jnanayoga, [[Wikipedia:Karma yoga|Karmayoga]], [[[Wikipedia:Karma yoga|Karmayoga]] is the performance of one's duties, [[moral]] and [[religious]], and without any selfinterest in the result after obtaining a [[knowledge]] of the [[realities]] (Cit, Acit and Ts'vara.) through the [[Scriptures]], and always [[contemplating]] it with various kinds of [[Karma]] (Vide the S'rT [[Bhasya]] of [[Ramanujacarya]], [[Adhyaya]] 3, [[pada]] 3 ]— and [[Bhaktiyoga]]. [ [[Bhaktiyoga]]. — This is also called [[upasana]]. It is the contemplation of the [[Brahman]] with its various qualities, and [[attributes]], without any interruption whatever, throughout one's whole [[life]]; at the same time discharging his duties to the best of his ability ] — The last [[forms]] the [[principal]] [Page 52] [[subject]] of this work and is considered easier than either the [[Jnana]] or Karmayogas, and is therefore recommended to those |
− | who are desirous of obtaining Moksa, but unable to practise the various ways leading to it. It treats in the Kriyapada, of the construction of temples and their different modes, and also of the modelling of idols; and lastly of the various ways of worshipping the idols thus prepared, treating of course of the various Mantras, Vaisnava or S'aiva as the case may be, and other topics such as the principles of Vaisnava mantras, their nature and uses, the secret virtues of herbs, etc.. The philosophy of these Agamas leans more towards Advaita than anything else, and although this four-fold division is not to be found in some of them, still all of them, after a short introduction, take up the question of Carya or the mode of worship of idols. | + | who are desirous of obtaining [[Moksa]], but unable to practise the various ways leading to it. It treats in the Kriyapada, of the construction of [[temples]] and their different modes, and also of the modelling of {{Wiki|idols}}; and lastly of the various ways of worshipping the {{Wiki|idols}} thus prepared, treating of course of the various [[Mantras]], Vaisnava or S'aiva as the case may be, and other topics such as the {{Wiki|principles}} of Vaisnava [[mantras]], their [[nature]] and uses, the secret [[virtues]] of herbs, etc.. The [[philosophy]] of these [[Agamas]] leans more towards [[Wikipedia:Advaita Vedanta|Advaita]] than anything else, and although this four-fold [[division]] is not to be found in some of them, still all of them, after a short introduction, take up the question of [[Carya]] or the mode of {{Wiki|worship}} of {{Wiki|idols}}. |
− | The above remarks apply as well to S'aivagammas, of which there are twenty-eight, with the only difference that in the case of S'aivagamas the word S'iva must be substituted for Narayana. | + | The above remarks apply as well to S'aivagammas, of which there are twenty-eight, with the only difference that in the case of S'aivagamas the [[word]] S'iva must be substituted for [[Narayana]]. |
The names of the twenty-eight are given below. | The names of the twenty-eight are given below. | ||
Line 504: | Line 504: | ||
(6)Yogaja; | (6)Yogaja; | ||
(7) DTpta; | (7) DTpta; | ||
− | (8) Cinta; | + | (8) [[Cinta]]; |
− | (9) Karana; [Page 53] | + | (9) [[Karana]]; [Page 53] |
− | (10) Ancita (agita); | + | (10) Ancita ([[agita]]); |
− | (11) Vijaya (jaya); | + | (11) [[Vijaya]] ([[jaya]]); |
(12) VTra; (13) Vis'va; | (12) VTra; (13) Vis'va; | ||
(14) Ams'umat; | (14) Ams'umat; | ||
− | (15) Svayambhuva; | + | (15) [[Svayambhuva]]; |
− | (16) NTla (anala); | + | (16) NTla ([[anala]]); |
− | (17) Siddha (Sarvottama); | + | (17) [[Siddha]] (Sarvottama); |
− | (18) Suprabheda (Bheda); | + | (18) Suprabheda ([[Bheda]]); |
− | (19) Raurava; | + | (19) [[Raurava]]; |
(20) Makuta; | (20) Makuta; | ||
− | (21) Bimba; | + | (21) [[Bimba]]; |
− | (22) Vimala; | + | (22) [[Vimala]]; |
− | (23) Lohita; | + | (23) [[Lohita]]; |
− | (24) Sahasra (Nis'vasa); | + | (24) [[Sahasra]] (Nis'vasa); |
(25) Parames'vara; | (25) Parames'vara; | ||
(26) Prodga; | (26) Prodga; | ||
Line 528: | Line 528: | ||
− | These are generally of the form of a dialogue between S'iva and his consort ParvatT. She always begins “What are the most interesting secrets in the world ? ” and the luxurious husband relates all that she wants. The first twenty are given out from his four faces, Aghora, Tatpurusa, Vamana and Sadyojata, at the rate of five Samhitas from each face. The remaining eight were taught when he assumed that terrible aspect called Ts'ana. [ Five more Samhitas viz.. S'uka, Vasistha, S'ais'aka, Sanandana, Sanatkumara, works subsequently written and attributed to S'iva, each of which is said to contain about. 30,000 s'lokas. but not having seen any of them nothing definite can be said about them. They are however said to treat of the different kinds of Yoga ] — The arrangement is the same as in the Pancaratra in being divided into Jnana, Yoga, Kriya and Carya-padas, treating of the worship of S'iva. in the form of idols and analogous to that of Visnu; there being,however, some exceptions. [Page 54] | + | These are generally of the [[form]] of a {{Wiki|dialogue}} between S'iva and his [[consort]] ParvatT. She always begins “What are the most [[interesting]] secrets in the [[world]] ? ” and the luxurious husband relates all that she wants. The first twenty are given out from his four faces, [[Aghora]], Tatpurusa, [[Vamana]] and Sadyojata, at the rate of five [[Samhitas]] from each face. The remaining eight were [[taught]] when he assumed that terrible aspect called Ts'ana. [ Five more [[Samhitas]] viz.. S'uka, [[Vasistha]], S'ais'aka, Sanandana, [[Sanatkumara]], works subsequently written and attributed to S'iva, each of which is said to contain about. 30,000 s'lokas. but not having seen any of them nothing definite can be said about them. They are however said to treat of the different kinds of [[Yoga]] ] — The arrangement is the same as in the [[Pancaratra]] in being divided into [[Jnana]], [[Yoga]], [[Kriya]] and Carya-padas, treating of the {{Wiki|worship}} of S'iva. in the [[form]] of {{Wiki|idols}} and analogous to that of {{Wiki|Visnu}}; there being,however, some exceptions. [Page 54] |
− | The S'aktagamas begin in the same strain as S'aivagamas, ParvatT questioning S'iva as to the best way of worshipping and knowing her real nature. It is then told that she has sixty-four aspects. Each of them is dealt with in one of the 64 Samhitas of the S'aktagamas . In these Tantras as in the Pancaratra and S'aivagamas, the Vedas are highly spoken of as a rule, and the Vedic methods approved. But in Kalivuga when people have a predominant tendency towards worldly pleasures, the worship of S'akti is recommended as the easiest way of obtaining happiness. | + | The S'aktagamas begin in the same strain as S'aivagamas, ParvatT questioning S'iva as to the best way of worshipping and [[knowing]] her real [[nature]]. It is then told that she has sixty-four aspects. Each of them is dealt with in one of the 64 [[Samhitas]] of the S'aktagamas . In these [[Tantras]] as in the [[Pancaratra]] and S'aivagamas, the [[Vedas]] are highly spoken of as a {{Wiki|rule}}, and the {{Wiki|Vedic}} [[methods]] approved. But in Kalivuga when [[people]] have a predominant tendency towards [[worldly pleasures]], the {{Wiki|worship}} of S'akti is recommended as the easiest way of obtaining [[happiness]]. |
− | If however, one should worship her with no other desire ( Niskama Karma) than of obtaining moksa, he will either obtain moksa at the end of this life-time or in his next, but that depends on the nature of the | + | If however, one should {{Wiki|worship}} her with no other [[desire]] ( Niskama [[Karma]]) than of obtaining [[moksa]], he will either obtain [[moksa]] at the end of this [[life-time]] or in his next, but that depends on the [[nature]] of the |
− | Karma he has done which may lead him from birth to birth. All these ideas are decidedly Vedantic, but even in such writings as Jnanarnava, and Kaularnava Tantra, the goal is not | + | [[Karma]] he has done which may lead him from [[birth]] to [[birth]]. All these [[ideas]] are decidedly {{Wiki|Vedantic}}, but even in such writings as Jnanarnava, and Kaularnava [[Tantra]], the goal is not |
− | lost sight of, and the importance of the Vedas not forgotten; and the S'akta worshipper is enjoined to attend, to the regular duties of caste. Unfortunately, however, this matter is mis-represented by European writers, and even to a certain extent by the Indian writers [Page 55] themselves, who with a prejudiced mind, and after going through a portion of these Tantras and seeing the depravity of morals as shown by that portion of the work, jump at once to the conclusion that the Tantras, in general, and the S'akta | + | lost [[sight]] of, and the importance of the [[Vedas]] not forgotten; and the S'akta worshipper is enjoined to attend, to the regular duties of [[caste]]. Unfortunately, however, this {{Wiki|matter}} is mis-represented by {{Wiki|European}} writers, and even to a certain extent by the [[Indian]] writers [Page 55] themselves, who with a prejudiced [[mind]], and after going through a portion of these [[Tantras]] and [[seeing]] the [[depravity]] of {{Wiki|morals}} as shown by that portion of the work, jump at once to the conclusion that the [[Tantras]], in general, and the S'akta |
− | Tantras in particular are opposed to the Vedas; but forget that in the very Samhitas they have gone through, the Vedic duties are spoken of highly and the importance of obtaining moksa described. In an such cases, therefore, a careful study should be made of two or more Samhitas and then a calm judgement should be given. The practices of S'aktas are no doubt indecent, but that is not the end or aim of the S'aktagamas. For instance, this point has been argued, and the same conclusions, arrived at in the 1st Ullasa of Kaularnava Tantra and the Mahanirvana Tantra. This view is also taken in the Rudrayamala, PhetkarinT, and several other Tantras inculcating S'akti worship. | + | [[Tantras]] in particular are opposed to the [[Vedas]]; but forget that in the very [[Samhitas]] they have gone through, the {{Wiki|Vedic}} duties are spoken of highly and the importance of obtaining [[moksa]] described. In an such cases, therefore, a careful study should be made of two or more [[Samhitas]] and then a [[calm]] [[judgement]] should be given. The practices of S'aktas are no [[doubt]] indecent, but that is not the end or aim of the S'aktagamas. For instance, this point has been argued, and the same conclusions, arrived at in the 1st Ullasa of Kaularnava [[Tantra]] and the [[Mahanirvana Tantra]]. This view is also taken in the [[Rudrayamala]], PhetkarinT, and several other [[Tantras]] inculcating S'akti {{Wiki|worship}}. |
− | The writer is no sectarian follower of S'aktas, but while he abhors the moral depravity exhibited in them his individual conclusions are based on a study of more than five Tantras selected specially for the study of the different aspects of S'akti worship. | + | The writer is no {{Wiki|sectarian}} follower of S'aktas, but while he abhors the [[moral]] [[depravity]] exhibited in them his {{Wiki|individual}} conclusions are based on a study of more than five [[Tantras]] selected specially for the study of the different aspects of S'akti {{Wiki|worship}}. |
The sixty-four S'aktagamas are as follow: [Page 56] | The sixty-four S'aktagamas are as follow: [Page 56] | ||
− | 1. Mahamaya S'ambara explains the formation of the universe and of illusions. | + | 1. [[Mahamaya]] S'ambara explains the formation of the [[universe]] and of [[illusions]]. |
− | 2. YoginT Jala S'ambara speaks of the illusion caused by YoginTs, a certain class of Devatas which one will conquer over only by certain practices in the burial ground. | + | 2. YoginT [[Jala]] S'ambara speaks of the [[illusion]] [[caused]] by YoginTs, a certain class of [[Devatas]] which one will conquer over only by certain practices in the burial ground. |
− | 3 & 4. Tattva S'ambara, of command over the elements; and Mahendrajala Tantra, of showing water in air, in earth, etc.. | + | 3 & 4. [[Tattva]] S'ambara, of command over the [[elements]]; and Mahendrajala [[Tantra]], of showing [[water]] in [[air]], in [[earth]], etc.. |
− | 5 to 12. Asta Bhairava: Siddha, Vatuka, Badabanala, Kaa, Kalagni, YoginT, Maha and S'akti Tantras. They treat of the eight Siddhis (Animan, etc..). | + | 5 to 12. Asta {{Wiki|Bhairava}}: [[Siddha]], Vatuka, Badabanala, Kaa, [[Kalagni]], YoginT, [[Maha]] and S'akti [[Tantras]]. They treat of the [[eight Siddhis]] (Animan, etc..). |
− | 13 to 20. Bahurupastaka: these treat of the worship of BrahmT, Mahes'varT, KaumarT, VaisnavT, VarahT, MahendrT, CamundT, S'ivadutT The most important subject therein touched S'rTvidya which is one of the highest of occult methods. | + | 13 to 20. Bahurupastaka: these treat of the {{Wiki|worship}} of BrahmT, Mahes'varT, KaumarT, VaisnavT, VarahT, MahendrT, CamundT, S'ivadutT The most important [[subject]] therein touched S'rTvidya which is one of the [[highest]] of [[occult]] [[methods]]. |
− | 21 to 28. Yamalastaka treat of the worship of DevT; they are Vedantic and highly esoteric in their nature. | + | 21 to 28. Yamalastaka treat of the {{Wiki|worship}} of DevT; they are {{Wiki|Vedantic}} and highly [[esoteric]] in their [[nature]]. |
− | 29. Candrajnana (NityasodasT Tantra) speaks of Kapali worship. | + | 29. Candrajnana (NityasodasT [[Tantra]]) speaks of [[Kapali]] {{Wiki|worship}}. |
− | 30. MalinT treats of diseases and their cure. | + | 30. MalinT treats of {{Wiki|diseases}} and their cure. |
− | 31. MahasaIpmohana. Making a waking man sleep, e.g., by means of black art, such as the cutting of children's tongues. [Page 57] | + | 31. MahasaIpmohana. Making a waking man [[sleep]], e.g., by means of black [[art]], such as the cutting of children's tongues. [Page 57] |
32. Vamajusta. | 32. Vamajusta. | ||
Line 572: | Line 572: | ||
36. Kamika. | 36. Kamika. | ||
− | [Items 34 to 36 deals with Erection of temples, etc.. These should not be confounded with the S'aivagamas of the same name] | + | [Items 34 to 36 deals with Erection of [[temples]], etc.. These should not be confounded with the S'aivagamas of the same [[name]]] |
− | 37. Hrdbheda Kapalika, speaks of taking and placing of Hrtkamala in Brahmarandhra. | + | 37. Hrdbheda [[Kapalika]], speaks of taking and placing of Hrtkamala in [[Brahmarandhra]]. |
− | 38. Tantrabheda — killing of men by mantras, fascination, etc. | + | 38. Tantrabheda — {{Wiki|killing}} of men by [[mantras]], fascination, etc. |
− | 39. Guhya. | + | 39. [[Guhya]]. |
40. Kalavada — speaks of Kalas of every kind. | 40. Kalavada — speaks of Kalas of every kind. | ||
− | 41. Kalasara — Vamacara or left-hand worship | + | 41. Kalasara — Vamacara or left-hand {{Wiki|worship}} |
42. Kundikamata of gulika or certain secret herbal preparations. | 42. Kundikamata of gulika or certain secret herbal preparations. | ||
− | 43. Matottara. On mercurial preparations, alchemy, etc. | + | 43. Matottara. On mercurial preparations, [[alchemy]], etc. |
− | 44. VTna. — This is the name of a YoginT; and the Samhita treats of the different ways of conquering her, she being also (called Sambhoga YaksinT). | + | 44. VTna. — This is the [[name]] of a YoginT; and the [[Samhita]] treats of the different ways of conquering her, she being also (called [[Sambhoga]] YaksinT). |
− | 45. Trottala speaks of Gulika, Anjana, and Paduka. | + | 45. Trottala speaks of Gulika, [[Anjana]], and Paduka. |
46. Trottalottara winning over the 64,000 YaksinTs. [Page 58] | 46. Trottalottara winning over the 64,000 YaksinTs. [Page 58] | ||
− | 47. Pancamrta; of the ways of preventing death. | + | 47. Pancamrta; of the ways of preventing [[death]]. |
− | 48 to 51. Rupabhedaka, or Bhutoddamara, Kulasara, KulodTs'a, Kulacudamani — teach of the different ways of killing a man or Vamacara methods. | + | 48 to 51. Rupabhedaka, or Bhutoddamara, Kulasara, KulodTs'a, Kulacudamani — teach of the different ways of {{Wiki|killing}} a man or Vamacara [[methods]]. |
− | [ 52 to 56 deals Of Kapalika worship] | + | [ 52 to 56 deals Of [[Kapalika]] {{Wiki|worship}}] |
52 Sarvajnanottara, | 52 Sarvajnanottara, | ||
Line 610: | Line 610: | ||
56 Vikunthes'vara, | 56 Vikunthes'vara, | ||
− | [ 57 to 64 deals with The doctrines of the Digambara] | + | [ 57 to 64 deals with The [[doctrines]] of the {{Wiki|Digambara}}] |
− | 57 Purva Tantra, | + | 57 [[Purva]] [[Tantra]], |
− | 58 Pas'cima Tantra, | + | 58 Pas'cima [[Tantra]], |
− | 59 Daksina Tantra, | + | 59 Daksina [[Tantra]], |
− | 60 Uttara Tantra, | + | 60 [[Uttara Tantra]], |
− | 61 Niruttara Tantra, | + | 61 [[Niruttara]] [[Tantra]], |
− | 62 Vimala, | + | 62 [[Vimala]], |
63 Vimalottara, | 63 Vimalottara, | ||
Line 630: | Line 630: | ||
− | The existing works on Mantras are mostly compilations and abstract of one or more of these 200 Samhitas. Their number may be estimated at not less than a thousand in Southern India, and it is not possible to say how many that were formerly written, are now lost. To this class belong works, such as Mantramahodadhi, Tantrasara, Saradatilaka, [Page 59] Prapancasara, Mantrarnava, and others ordinarily met with. | + | The [[existing]] works on [[Mantras]] are mostly compilations and abstract of one or more of these 200 [[Samhitas]]. Their number may be estimated at not less than a thousand in Southern [[India]], and it is not possible to say how many that were formerly written, are now lost. To this class belong works, such as Mantramahodadhi, [[Tantrasara]], Saradatilaka, [Page 59] Prapancasara, Mantrarnava, and others ordinarily met with. |
− | The difference between the Pancaratra and S'aivagamas lies in the Pancaratras treating more of those things that would lead to Brahmajnana; and are therefore more transcendental than the S'aivagamas. A similar remark applies when we speak of the relative merits of S'aivagamas and S'aktagamas. The latter treat of indecent subjects devoting some of the Samhitas to Daksinacara, and some to Vamacara. Several matters, are, however, common to all the three Agamas, viz., a devotion to the subject of mantras in general, including the general principles which regulate a mantra, and the Siddhi or acquirement of certain occult powers through a contemplation of mantras and their symbols. | + | The difference between the [[Pancaratra]] and S'aivagamas lies in the Pancaratras treating more of those things that would lead to [[Brahmajnana]]; and are therefore more [[transcendental]] than the S'aivagamas. A similar remark applies when we speak of the [[relative]] [[merits]] of S'aivagamas and S'aktagamas. The [[latter]] treat of indecent [[subjects]] devoting some of the [[Samhitas]] to Daksinacara, and some to Vamacara. Several matters, are, however, common to all the three [[Agamas]], viz., a [[devotion]] to the [[subject]] of [[mantras]] in general, [[including]] the general {{Wiki|principles}} which regulate a [[mantra]], and the [[Siddhi]] or acquirement of certain [[occult powers]] through a contemplation of [[mantras]] and their [[symbols]]. |
− | The subject of mantras, however, is introduced to help their practice, and in order that the worship of the idols specified therein may be performed more efficiently. In the S'aivagamas, again, several of the more obscure and little known subjects, are treated of; such as the occult sciences of breath, omens, astrology, and other topics. Another subject common to all these Tantras is the incapacity of people to practise the methods of Brahma-vidya as [Page 60] described in the Upanisads; and an attempt to substitute easier methods of worship. Regarding the worship proper, each of them specifies its own objects, although there is not much difference in either their rationale, or the object with which the idols are worshipped. | + | The [[subject]] of [[mantras]], however, is introduced to help their practice, and in order that the {{Wiki|worship}} of the {{Wiki|idols}} specified therein may be performed more efficiently. In the S'aivagamas, again, several of the more obscure and little known [[subjects]], are treated of; such as the [[occult]] [[sciences]] of [[breath]], {{Wiki|omens}}, [[astrology]], and other topics. Another [[subject]] common to all these [[Tantras]] is the incapacity of [[people]] to practise the [[methods]] of Brahma-vidya as [Page 60] described in the [[Upanisads]]; and an attempt to substitute easier [[methods]] of {{Wiki|worship}}. Regarding the {{Wiki|worship}} proper, each of them specifies its [[own]] [[objects]], although there is not much difference in either their rationale, or the [[object]] with which the {{Wiki|idols}} are worshipped. |
− | Having therefore explained the nature of these writings, we shall now speak of their teachings. | + | Having therefore explained the [[nature]] of these writings, we shall now speak of their teachings. |
− | To take up the Pancaratra agamas first, Jnana is essential to attain moksa. For that purpose, Narayana is described as indescribable in the same strain as Advaitic works. | + | To take up the [[Pancaratra]] [[agamas]] first, [[Jnana]] is [[essential]] to attain [[moksa]]. For that {{Wiki|purpose}}, [[Narayana]] is described as [[indescribable]] in the same strain as [[Advaitic]] works. |
− | The first manifestation of Narayana is Vasudeva with an the emblems of Visnu: he is said to be located in the heart in the microcosm. He is the object of worship and the goal to be reached. Vasudeva divides himself into two, Narayana and Vasudeva, the former being of a blue colour, the latter being white. From Vasudeva there sprang up another manifestation called Samkarsana. From him comes Aniruddha and from Aniruddha we have Pradyumna. These three represent one of the three attributes, viz, Jnana, Bala, Ais'varya of Vasudeva, predominating in them. Twenty four devas come into existence, six belonging to each of these manifestations and having one of [Page 61] the six attributes of Narayana, viz., Jnana, Bala, Ais'varya, VTrya, Tejas and S'akti. | + | The first [[manifestation]] of [[Narayana]] is [[Vasudeva]] with an the [[emblems]] of {{Wiki|Visnu}}: he is said to be located in the [[heart]] in the [[microcosm]]. He is the [[object]] of {{Wiki|worship}} and the goal to be reached. [[Vasudeva]] divides himself into two, [[Narayana]] and [[Vasudeva]], the former being of a blue {{Wiki|colour}}, the [[latter]] being white. From [[Vasudeva]] there sprang up another [[manifestation]] called Samkarsana. From him comes [[Aniruddha]] and from [[Aniruddha]] we have {{Wiki|Pradyumna}}. These three represent one of the three [[attributes]], viz, [[Jnana]], [[Bala]], Ais'varya of [[Vasudeva]], predominating in them. Twenty four [[devas]] come into [[existence]], six belonging to each of these [[manifestations]] and having one of [Page 61] the six [[attributes]] of [[Narayana]], viz., [[Jnana]], [[Bala]], Ais'varya, VTrya, [[Tejas]] and S'akti. |
− | These Devas are as follow: | + | These [[Devas]] are as follow: |
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | Vasudeva, | + | [[Vasudeva]], |
Kes'ava, | Kes'ava, | ||
− | Narayana, | + | [[Narayana]], |
− | Madhava, | + | [[Madhava]], |
Purusottama and Janardana; | Purusottama and Janardana; | ||
Samkarsana, | Samkarsana, | ||
− | Govinda, | + | [[Govinda]], |
− | Visnu, | + | {{Wiki|Visnu}}, |
− | Madhusudana, | + | [[Wikipedia:Madhusudanah|Madhusudana]], |
Adhoksaja, and Upendra; | Adhoksaja, and Upendra; | ||
− | Aniruddha, | + | [[Aniruddha]], |
− | Trivikrama, | + | [[Trivikrama]], |
− | Vamana, | + | [[Vamana]], |
S'rTdhara, | S'rTdhara, | ||
− | Narasimha, and Hari; | + | [[Narasimha]], and [[Hari]]; |
− | Pradyumna, | + | {{Wiki|Pradyumna}}, |
HrsTkes'a, | HrsTkes'a, | ||
− | Padmanabha, | + | [[Padmanabha]], |
− | Damodara, | + | [[Damodara]], |
− | Acyuta and Krsna. | + | [[Acyuta]] and [[Krsna]]. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
− | From these four original manifestations eight murtis, viz., BrahmT, Prajapatya; VaisnavT, Divija; ArsT, ManusT, AsurT, Pais'acT and also the ten incarnations of Visnu spring up. When all these manifestations took place, the various emblems of Visnu, such as Ananta, the discus, the conch, etc., corresponding to the eight Murtis, and the eight Prakrtis have also sprung up; and also Garuda. These four manifestations seem to correspond to the Vedantic ideas of Hiranyagarbha, Sutratman, Prajna, and Viraj. Brahma is then created by Aniruddha, and he in his turn created the world in the same way as is described in the Puranas, with no difference except that from Aniruddha, Maya sprang up and enveloped | + | From these four original [[manifestations]] eight [[murtis]], viz., BrahmT, Prajapatya; VaisnavT, Divija; ArsT, ManusT, AsurT, Pais'acT and also the ten [[incarnations]] of {{Wiki|Visnu}} spring up. When all these [[manifestations]] took place, the various [[emblems]] of {{Wiki|Visnu}}, such as [[Ananta]], the {{Wiki|discus}}, the [[conch]], etc., [[corresponding]] to the eight [[Murtis]], and the eight Prakrtis have also sprung up; and also [[Garuda]]. These four [[manifestations]] seem to correspond to the {{Wiki|Vedantic}} [[ideas]] of [[Hiranyagarbha]], Sutratman, [[Prajna]], and [[Viraj]]. [[Brahma]] is then created by [[Aniruddha]], and he in his turn created the [[world]] in the same way as is described in the {{Wiki|Puranas}}, with no difference except that from [[Aniruddha]], [[Maya]] sprang up and enveloped |
− | everybody in the universe. The laws of Karma are explained as the reason for people suffering for the wrongs they do. The escape from this lies in Jnana which is [Page 62) either Sattrunstta (?) Jnana of knowledge that “I am | + | everybody in the [[universe]]. The laws of [[Karma]] are explained as the [[reason]] for [[people]] [[suffering]] for the wrongs they do. The escape from this lies in [[Jnana]] which is [Page 62) either Sattrunstta (?) [[Jnana]] of [[knowledge]] that “I am [[Brahman]]”; or [[Kriya]] [[Jnana]] ([[knowledge]] by work) or [[Yoga]] as explained in the writings on the [[subject]]; an alternative is allowed, namely, of {{Wiki|concentrating}} one's [[mind]] on an image or [[idol]] ( Praticchaya) of [[Brahman]]. In this and a similar manner the Jnana-pada finishes and a third method, viz.; the practice of [[Abhyasa]] [[Yoga]] is described in the Yoga-pada. He who is unable to perform any of these [[methods]], but is at the same time anxious to obtain [[moksa]], is enjoined in the Kriya-pada to have plenty of [[wealth]] and to dedicate a [[temple]] to {{Wiki|worship}} [[Narayana]] in the manner therein described. |
− | A similar worship is also enjoined for S'iva in the S'aivagamas. The subject is introduced in the same way as in the Pancaratra agamas. Here S'iva is considered as a manifestation of the Brahman who is also some-times called Sadas'iva. He is said to have five aspects ( mukha ) viz, Ts'ana, Sadyojata; Vamana; Aghora and Tatpurusa. As every one of these contains three eyes; it follows that he has fifteen, eyes when he appears at one and the same time in all his aspects. Then the Ts'ana is his head, the Tatpurusa his mouth, Aghora his heart, Vamana his secret part, and [Page 63] Sadyojata his feet. This body he is said to have assumed simply to enable the devotee to worship him. He is | + | A similar {{Wiki|worship}} is also enjoined for S'iva in the S'aivagamas. The [[subject]] is introduced in the same way as in the [[Pancaratra]] [[agamas]]. Here S'iva is considered as a [[manifestation]] of the [[Brahman]] who is also some-times called Sadas'iva. He is said to have five aspects ( [[mukha]] ) viz, Ts'ana, Sadyojata; [[Vamana]]; [[Aghora]] and Tatpurusa. As every one of these contains three [[eyes]]; it follows that he has fifteen, [[eyes]] when he appears at one and the same time in all his aspects. Then the Ts'ana is his head, the Tatpurusa his {{Wiki|mouth}}, [[Aghora]] his [[heart]], [[Vamana]] his secret part, and [Page 63] Sadyojata his feet. This [[body]] he is said to have assumed simply to enable the [[devotee]] to {{Wiki|worship}} him. He is |
− | also called Pas'upati, lord of jTvas ( pas'u) ; who are entirely dependent on him. Pas'upati informs his consort ParvatT that as it is impossible to practise, Brahma-vidya, he will teach Yoga for the good of mankind. Different kinds of Yoga are taught and S'aivagamas contain more information about Yoga than the Pancaratra-agamas. He again says, that in the Kali Yuga, it is not possible to practise Yoga, and therefore recommends his worship in some form or other. These subjects are taught in the Jnana and Yoga-padas of these agamas. Then comes Kriya-pada, in which he says that his worship in the form of linga (phallus) is preferable; if for such a worship a temple is built. If he cannot do even that, he is enjoined to worship a linga, which may be carried along by a devotee. This is Caryapada in which any other subjects such as Rudraksa which is recommended to be worn by the devotee, the secret of mantras, and the occult properties of herbs, etc., are also taught. | + | also called Pas'upati, lord of jTvas ( pas'u) ; who are entirely dependent on him. Pas'upati informs his [[consort]] ParvatT that as it is impossible to practise, Brahma-vidya, he will teach [[Yoga]] for the good of mankind. Different kinds of [[Yoga]] are [[taught]] and S'aivagamas contain more [[information]] about [[Yoga]] than the Pancaratra-agamas. He again says, that in the [[Kali Yuga]], it is not possible to practise [[Yoga]], and therefore recommends his {{Wiki|worship}} in some [[form]] or other. These [[subjects]] are [[taught]] in the [[Jnana]] and Yoga-padas of these [[agamas]]. Then comes Kriya-pada, in which he says that his {{Wiki|worship}} in the [[form]] of [[linga]] ({{Wiki|phallus}}) is preferable; if for such a {{Wiki|worship}} a [[temple]] is built. If he cannot do even that, he is enjoined to {{Wiki|worship}} a [[linga]], which may be carried along by a [[devotee]]. This is Caryapada in which any other [[subjects]] such as Rudraksa which is recommended to be worn by the [[devotee]], the secret of [[mantras]], and the [[occult]] properties of herbs, etc., are also [[taught]]. |
− | The S'aktagamas have a similar tale to tell. Prakrti or S'akti is said to be the primal force in the cosmos. She is defined to be of eternal [Page 64] existence and independent of Brahman and the plastic origin of all things. A detailed description follows in which the origin of all kinds of sentient beings including the devas is traced to her, and she is said to be eight-fold, (VarahT, CamundT, etc.). S'iva explains that by the power of Yoga, he divided himself, in the net of creation, into two. The right half was male (Ts'vara) and the left was female (NarT), and the whole was hence called ArdhanarTs'vara. The three female divinities LaksmT, SarasvatT and ParvatT are considered her manifestations. The rest of the Jnana, Yoga, and Kriyapadas are treated in the same manner as those of Pancaratra and S'aiva agamas, worship of S'akti being only instituted; it is said, as a substitute in this Yuga, for the higher mode of worship. | + | The S'aktagamas have a similar tale to tell. [[Prakrti]] or S'akti is said to be the primal force in the [[cosmos]]. She is defined to be of eternal [Page 64] [[existence]] and {{Wiki|independent}} of [[Brahman]] and the plastic origin of all things. A detailed description follows in which the origin of all kinds of [[sentient beings]] [[including]] the [[devas]] is traced to her, and she is said to be eight-fold, (VarahT, CamundT, etc.). S'iva explains that by the power of [[Yoga]], he divided himself, in the net of creation, into two. The right half was {{Wiki|male}} (Ts'vara) and the left was {{Wiki|female}} (NarT), and the whole was hence called ArdhanarTs'vara. The three {{Wiki|female}} [[divinities]] LaksmT, SarasvatT and ParvatT are considered her [[manifestations]]. The rest of the [[Jnana]], [[Yoga]], and Kriyapadas are treated in the same manner as those of [[Pancaratra]] and S'aiva [[agamas]], {{Wiki|worship}} of S'akti being only instituted; it is said, as a substitute in this [[Yuga]], for the higher mode of {{Wiki|worship}}. |
− | With regard to construction of temples, there is very little difference between them. Temples according to these Agamas are of four forms, circular, quadrilateral, oblongular, and elliptical. The last is very rarely to be met with now-a-days. The outer walls may be either one, three, five or seven with entrance gates. There may be one, two or four towers for the outermost wall. The towers may have any number of stories up to twelve. The temple should be in [Page 65] the centre of the village, and directions are given to find out which is the centre of the village. | + | With regard to construction of [[temples]], there is very little difference between them. [[Temples]] according to these [[Agamas]] are of four [[forms]], circular, quadrilateral, oblongular, and elliptical. The last is very rarely to be met with now-a-days. The outer walls may be either one, three, five or seven with entrance gates. There may be one, two or four towers for the outermost wall. The towers may have any number of stories up to twelve. The [[temple]] should be in [Page 65] the centre of the village, and [[directions]] are given to find out which is the centre of the village. |
− | That point is taken as the centre point of the temple intended to be constructed, and further directions are given as to the size of the temple according to the space available. A large number of temples constructed now-a-days do not at all conform to these instructions, and we thus see them sometimes at the end of the village. [ S'iva being a non-quiescent deity (Kruradevata) temples dedicated to him should be built outside or at the end of a village, if possible and so also for S'akti. The reason is said to be that if these are not properly worshipped, the force latent in them, will at once cast its influence around, and not only will the temple become useless as a centre of that force, but even harm will be done to the villagers ] | + | That point is taken as the centre point of the [[temple]] intended to be [[constructed]], and further [[directions]] are given as to the size of the [[temple]] according to the [[space]] available. A large number of [[temples]] [[constructed]] now-a-days do not at all conform to these instructions, and we thus see them sometimes at the end of the village. [ S'iva being a non-quiescent [[deity]] (Kruradevata) [[temples]] dedicated to him should be built outside or at the end of a village, if possible and so also for S'akti. The [[reason]] is said to be that if these are not properly worshipped, the force latent in them, will at once cast its influence around, and not only will the [[temple]] become useless as a centre of that force, but even harm will be done to the villagers ] |
− | Such has been a brief out-line of the teachings of the Tantras. They have been most severely criticized by Badarayana in his Brahma-Sutras (2nd Adhyaya, second pada) and condemned by S'amkaracarya. But the Pancaratra agamas have been upheld by Ramanujacarya, on the ground that although there are some theories in those Agamas antagonistic to the teachings of the Upanisads, those parts of the former that are not antagonistic to the latter might be considered authoritative. Nilakantha in his S'aivabhasya is reprehensible; | + | Such has been a brief out-line of the teachings of the [[Tantras]]. They have been most severely criticized by [[Badarayana]] in his [[Brahma-Sutras]] (2nd [[Adhyaya]], second [[pada]]) and condemned by S'amkaracarya. But the [[Pancaratra]] [[agamas]] have been upheld by [[Ramanujacarya]], on the ground that although there are some theories in those [[Agamas]] [[antagonistic]] to the teachings of the [[Upanisads]], those parts of the former that are not [[antagonistic]] to the [[latter]] might be considered authoritative. [[Nilakantha]] in his S'aivabhasya is reprehensible; |
− | he takes up the [Page 66] Sutra condemning the S'aivagamas, fills in certain words which he thinks are understood and twists the whole Sutra to mean “The worship of Pasupati is upheld”. Such has been the relation of Vedanta to the teachings of the Agamas, and as Hinduism is degenerating, their teachings and more especially the baser part of them, are gaining over the minds of the fallen Hindus. Yet we should be only too glad to find that Idol-worship, the least harmless of those teachings is still dragging on its existence; and in these days a correct understanding of the mode of worship will no doubt help us in our onward progress, for there lies the key to our development in occultism: and the exotericism of idol-worship, will I hope one day form the subject of my paper on the next occasion we may meet in this Hall to celebrate another epoch in the history of the Theosophical Society, had it not been for the work of which we would not all join our hands so gladly. | + | he takes up the [Page 66] [[Sutra]] condemning the S'aivagamas, fills in certain words which he [[thinks]] are understood and twists the whole [[Sutra]] to mean “The {{Wiki|worship}} of [[Pasupati]] is upheld”. Such has been the [[relation]] of [[Vedanta]] to the teachings of the [[Agamas]], and as [[Hinduism]] is degenerating, their teachings and more especially the baser part of them, are gaining over the [[minds]] of the fallen [[Hindus]]. Yet we should be only too glad to find that Idol-worship, the least harmless of those teachings is still dragging on its [[existence]]; and in these days a correct [[understanding]] of the mode of {{Wiki|worship}} will no [[doubt]] help us in our onward progress, for there lies the key to our [[development]] in [[occultism]]: and the exotericism of idol-worship, will I {{Wiki|hope}} one day [[form]] the [[subject]] of my paper on the next occasion we may meet in this Hall to celebrate another epoch in the history of the [[Theosophical Society]], had it not been for the work of which we would not all join our hands so gladly. |
− | The practice of mantras is a form of Yoga, the other kinds of Yoga being Raja, Laya, and Hatha; these practices are taken up by persons who have no command over their own will. With a dangerous weapon as Mantra Siddhi in their hands they can do any amount of harm to mankind, and if a man becomes so depraved [Page 67] in morals, he is in no way better than the Atlantean of old. It is the duty of every true Hindu not to meddle himself with these writings, if he finds he will soon become allured by their teachings; but if anyone does take them up, let me, for one, be allowed to recommend the best of them — idol-worship — as a means to the Higher Science, and let me warn, one and all who have seriously made up their minds to study these writings in the light of the words of Krsna: “He who worships them (the minor deities) goes to them, he who worships me attains me”. | + | The practice of [[mantras]] is a [[form]] of [[Yoga]], the other kinds of [[Yoga]] being [[Raja]], Laya, and Hatha; these practices are taken up by persons who have no command over their [[own]] will. With a [[dangerous]] weapon as [[Mantra]] [[Siddhi]] in their hands they can do any amount of harm to mankind, and if a man becomes so depraved [Page 67] in {{Wiki|morals}}, he is in no way better than the [[Atlantean]] of old. It is the [[duty]] of every true [[Hindu]] not to meddle himself with these writings, if he finds he will soon become allured by their teachings; but if anyone does take them up, let me, for one, be allowed to recommend the best of them — idol-worship — as a means to the Higher [[Science]], and let me warn, one and all who have seriously made up their [[minds]] to study these writings in the {{Wiki|light}} of the words of [[Krsna]]: “He who worships them (the minor [[deities]]) goes to them, he who worships me attains me”. |
Latest revision as of 08:46, 5 February 2020
An Introduction to the "Mantra Sastra"
by: S.E. Gopalacharlu
A paper read by the author before the Annual Convention of the Theosophical Society, held at Adyar, Madras, on 27th. 28th and 29th December, 1891.
Published in 1934
Theosophical Publishing House, Adyar, Chennai [[[Madras]]] India
The Theosophist Office, Adyar, Madras. India
PREFACE
[Page iii] MANTRA SASTRA is another department of Occult Science, which has for its objects all kinds of Siddhis or acquirements of powers for securing the objects aimed at by means of invoking the gods presiding them by repeating such Mantras or formulas as are intended for the purpose with the necessary ceremonies attending thereto. The whole of the four Vedas consist of nothing but Mantras, and as they proceed from the Pranava (the word Aum), the Pranava, consequently Adi or Mula Mantra or the Mantra of all Mantras; and it is acceptable to both the followers of Nigamas (the Vedas) and Agamas (the Tantras). For this reason no Mantra can become effective or powerful without uttering the Pranava in the commencement of it.
For the acquirement of the successful study and practice of this S'astra, the purity of body, speech, and mind is the first condition attending it; otherwise, they would lead to Black magic and to its disastrous results: that is to utter [Page iv] destruction of the soul or the higher Manas. Strong will - power and undaunted courage are also the conditions required for this purpose.
Though the Mantra and Yoga S'astras belong to the occult science, yet the difference between them is very great. The former is an objective science and the latter is a subjective one.
The Mantra S'astra develops the powers by appealing to the external objects, such as gods and goddesses (the forces in nature), while the Yogin develops them by self-culture or by unifying or identifying himself with the manifested universe as part and parcel of the Is'vara or the Creator.
The Yogin by the virtue of his culture, gets all the powers of the Siddhis without effort while the Mantrika has to evoke them by the Mantras and the ceremonies attending them.
In order to make this difference clear to the mind of our readers, we have in this form reprinted the paper read by Mr. Gopalacharlu and hope that our object will be accomplished.
We specially draw the attention of our readers to the fourth Section on “The Nature and Teachings of the Tantras”. T. P.H.
SECTION - I -
THE NATURE OF MANTRAS
IT is with great diffidence that I ascend the platform today, to give you my few thoughts on mantras, a subject which, however interesting it may be, cannot be exhausted in a few essays. My object then is to place before you the results of my own studies in that direction, subject, of course, to the correction of my more advanced fellow Theosophists; and thus to benefit myself in one way.
I can only give you, owing to the shortness of the time at my disposal, the barest outlines [Page 2] of the subject. It is impossible for a single individual to master the information treated of in 37,00,000 verses containing the original writings on mantras and Occultism, known as the Agamas, besides several other works now supposed to have been lost; for occultism is treated in these writings in all its phases, and a theoretical knowledge of them presupposes a good deal of practical knowledge in one of them at least.
I cannot too strongly impress upon your minds the necessity of my giving references, and in important points quoting the authorities in support of my arguments, more especially because a slur has been cast upon us that we do not correctly represent the views of the ancients, and that we give out as correct what emanates from our brains, without taking
the trouble of seeing whether our statements are borne out by the master-minds of old. I, for one, beg leave to admit for a moment, without quoting any instances of such neglect of duty, the truth of such statements, and believe that you will all agree with me that the charge is partially true at least. I would therefore try my best to support my statements, with references to the best authoritative writings; for if we give the public, any more room to think [Page 3] of us as they now do, not only will the truth of our doctrines be less and less appreciated, but we shall be in their eyes no better than a set of self - styled masters who have nothing to show for our title.
The importance of sound has been most excellently sung by a poet of the Rg-veda, hoary with antiquity and wisdom, when he said:
Catvari vak parimita padani tani vidur brahmana ye manJsinah, guha trJni nihita nengayanti, tuffyam vaco manusya vadanti.
This literally means: All vaks are of four kinds: so the Brahmanas learned in the Vedas (know); three of which are latent, and the last is spoken. This statement gave rise to the fourfold classification. The Vedas have been divided into four; the Vaidikas — l use the term in the sense in which Yaska used it, viz., the ancient Vedic teachers — say that the Pranava (Om) and the three mantras known as Vyahrtis (Bhuh, Bhuva; and Suvah) are here referred to; the grammarians consider the same
passage as referring to the grammatical forms and [Page 4] terminations, naman, akhyata, upasarga and nipata; those following the school of Nirukta interpret the same as the Rc, Yajus, Saman, and the words spoken of in the world. Those versed in Mantras'astra only enlarge the views of the last named by explaining them to mean the Para, Pas'yantT, Madhyama and VaikharT forms of Vak. [This Mantra forms the 45th hymn of the 164th Sukta of the 22nd Anuvaka of the 1 st Mandala of the Rg-veda. This Sukta contains 52 hymns the Rsi of which is DTrghatamas. The first 41 Mantras are addressed to Vis'vedevas; the 42nd and 45th to VagdevT, who is explained by Sayanacarya to mean the same as the Logos. I would in this connection refer the reader for further details to Yogas 'ikhopanisad ]
This last interpretation is the basis on which the mantras were formed as I shall show you later on.
The potency of sound has been spoken of in very high terms by all writers of antiquity and by none more so than Patanjali's himself, the well-known author of the Yoga Sutras, in his more splendid work, the Mahabhasya, a commentary on the grammatical rules of Panini. He says, the four horns [The reference is here to the Vedic passage: “Catnari s'rnga trayo asya pada dve s'Trse sapta hastaso asya, tridha baddho vrsabho roraviti maho devo martyan avives'a”
are the four classes in [Page 5] which the Brahman is compared to a Bull; and this passage Patanjali's takes for his authority. Kayyata in his commentary on Mahabhasya says that this is a description of Sabdabrahman (Logos) under the character of a Bull. The meaning of the Mantra is:
Words, noun, verb, prefix, particle, and other kinds (of grammatical terminations). The three feet thereof are the three times, the past, the present and the future; the two heads are the two natures of sound, the eternal, and the factitious. The seven hands there are the seven case affixes. “Trebly bound”, i.e., connected with the three localities, the chest, the throat and the head. The bull (vrsabha) is so called from its showering down (varsana) - (i.e., showering down enjoyments). It bellows ( roraviti ), i.e., makes a sound. How is this ? The verb means 'making a sound'. The ‘great God did enter mortals' : the great God, i.e., sound; mortals in men whose lot it is to die: these he did enter in order that they might become assimilated with the God.
This statement has been explained by his commentators to mean that the ETERNAL SOUND has become manifested in man, in order that he may be again assimilated into Him (The Eternal Sound or Sabdabrahman or the Logos) verily the man that knows the fitness of speech, whose sins have been removed by the employment of speech preceded by a knowledge of language and who, having split the knots of egotism, doth enter. [Page 6]
Patanjali's next turns his attention to the Vedic hymn I have already quoted, and proceeds to say:
Another text says: Four are the kinds of words, the divisions of speech. Hence do know the knowers of Brahman (Brahmanah) who have will over the mind; three placed in the cave, [ Vivarana explains ‘cave' to mean ‘where the occult development of sound takes place'. By ‘not getting a glimpse thereof' is meant 'their not being the depositories of any kind
of knowledge in regard to the three stages of sound anterior to its articulation.'] men take no notice of; the fourth (degree) of speech they utter'. The 'four words' that are the divisions of speech are the four sets of words, the nouns, verbs, prefixes and particles. 'Thou dost know the knowers of Brahman who have will over their minds,' - who have the will of their minds,(or have the mind in subjection to the will) — such is the meaning of the word manTsin. 'Three placed within the cave', they take no notice of; — of the three placed within the cave 'they take no note', they busy themselves not with them, they get not a glimpse thereof. 'The fourth (part) of speech men do utter' : the fourth (turTya) is that fourth part (of entireness) of speech which is found among men.
I have almost literally translated the words of Patanjali's as a writer on grammar — the grammar of factitious speech, the proper study of which, he says, preserves the Vedas and prevents their corruption saying. By saying ‘factitious speech' he means the VaikharT Vak, for we believe that the other three forms of Vak form the subject of occult sciences.
The Hindus believe that Hanuman was taught by Surya in nine grammars: and leaving off the ninth which treats of the factitious language, we have the eight grammars speaking the hidden forms of speech, the number eight including certain intermediate stages of the three latent Vaks or forms of speech alluded to above. This lowest form of speech is the object of knowledge, and one of the objects of which is obtaining the full knowledge of words, or, to adopt Patanjali's explanation, in order to obtain a command over his own mind.
“Of trinal speech distinguished by its several locations as the pronounced ( VaikharT), the intermediate (madhyama) and the seeing ( pas'yantT). This marvellous one is the ultimate degree. Among these the pronounced is that which is the object of hearing, the intermediate abiding in the region of the heart is the cause of discourse, since (else) there would never be words perceived; but the pas'yantT or 'the seeing' (so-named actively honoris causa; while it means, what is seen by the enlightened) is beyond vulgar
concernment, but in it moreover do those with concentrated minds arrive at the distinction between the bases and the affixes. But in the ultimate (para vak), it is not so (no [Page 8] distinction of parts) being there discoverable. Speech is on that account said to be ' trinal '. [ Bartrhari's VakyapadTya quoted by Nages'abhatta in his BhasyapradTpoddyota. I may here add that Bhartrhari was one of the first commentators on the Mahabhasya; and the subsequent commentary of Kayyata, and the commentary thereon by Nages'abhatta, are based on this great work which is said to have consisted of 100,000 granthas ]
It is plain from what has been said above that the laws which govern ordinary speech also govern mantras, the latter being only speech arranged according to certain modulations of sound. Such being the case we shall now enquire into the signification of the word 'mantra'.
‘Mantra' has been derived from the root man to think: and it has among several other ways, also been explained to be so called on account of its protecting the Upasaka, i.e., one who develops the occult power by practising it with its accompaniments, from all sorts of dangers and difficulties. The word is also cognate with Manana meaning ‘to think', and described as one of the paths leading to Brahman. Mantras are of the VaikharT vak and correspond to the Sthula plane of matter.
The origin of mantras and devatas is this. Brahman which is known in the Mantras'astras as Bindu, possesses a force called BTja, but known in the Vedantic Writings as S'akti or [Page 9] Prakrti. Their united action is Nada, of S'abdabrahman or the Logos. There is, however, a little difference of opinion among this class of occultists as to the nature of the sounds uttered by the Mantras. One class thinks them to be manifestations of the Logos; others again consider them as the manifestations of the S'akti, and say that
S'abdabrahman is the consciousness in all things. This consciousness resides in man in the KundalinT NadT and is said to be the origin of all the letters of the Alphabet.
We have now three kinds of creations. From Bindu we have in order, Sadas'iva, Rudra, Visnu, Brahma, which are either so many different Logoi, or different aspects of one and the same principle. The other creation is from S'akti. Its first manifestation is Mahat, which is either Sattvika, Rajasa or Tamasa. These give rise to the three kinds of Ahamkara. On the plane of Ahamkara we have the ten deities known as Diks or directions, Vayu, As'vins, the Fire, the Sun, [ It must be here said that the sun, fire. etc., do not mean those on the physical plane with which we are acquainted, but their astral, or in some cases, even higher counterparts ]. Pracetas, Indra, Upendra, Mitra, and the ten senses and the Tanmatras. From these last we have the five elements [Page 10] known to Indian philosophy. Each one of them is thus symbolised.
All the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet belonging to these tattvas follow the symbol used for the particular class to which they belong and these symbols play a not unimportant part in the practice of the Mantras.
From these elements the physical body of man takes its origin, and in it the KundalinT force is located. The three nadTs known as Ida, Pi’ngala and Susumna extend from the nose to a little below the navel, and the KundalinT is located a little above the anus. It is described as coiled like a serpent, and when awakened by the power of Yoga, it becomes straightened, and shuts the passages to the three nadTs mentioned above. According to Indian writers, S'abda takes its origin in the KundalinT; and it is the sound which takes its rise from KundalinT that passes the three stages Para, Pas'yantT and Madhyama and at last comes out as the one which we all hear and speak comprising the fifty letters of the Samskrt [Page 11] Alphabet. It has been briefly said that the world of S'abda takes its origin from sounds. In other words, it means that a name or sound expressed to denote a particular object is identical with the object itself. |
This idea will no doubt appear very curious to those of us who have been used to the modern way of thinking, but is pre-eminently an Indian idea; and no Indian writer has explained this theory more clearly than Patanjali's, whom I quote once more:
Among those (viz., sounds, or words, secular and spiritual) the secular in the first place are such as cow, house, man and Brahma. The scriptural are verily indeed as AgnimJle purohitam (and such other passages found in the Vedas); now (let us take) ‘cow'. Here, which is the word ? That which is in the shape of a thing with dewlap, tail, hump, hoofs,
horns — pray is that the word ? Nay, replies he (referring to Papini whose Sutras on Samskrt grammar and philology Patanjali's comments upon). That is not a word, but verily a substance. Then — the hints, gestures and winking — is that the word? Nay, he replies — that verily is the action. Then the white, the black, the tawny, the spotted, is that the
word? Nay, he replies, that verily is quality .Then that which in many is different (and yet) not different — and that which is not destroyed in things that are destroyed by disintegration — that which in the common nature (of all that exists) — is that the word? Nay, he replies — verily is the form (implying the genus or Platonic idea). What then is the word ? A word is that through which, when uttered, there is the [Page 12] cognition (i.e.,) things with dewlap, tail, hump, hoofs and horns, or in the world a noise; a noise with a recognized series is a word or sound.
This last statement has been explained by Kayyata to mean that an identity ( tadatmya) exists between a word and the object it signifies. It is generally said that the Kundalini has fifty letters. This means a great many things. It has been explained in the Mantras'astras that all the fifty letters take their rise in their para form of course, from the Kundalini; and that the force latent in it becomes manifested in the forms of sounds which to the ancient Indian grammarians comprised the fifty letters of the Samskrt Alphabet.
When first any attempt is made to utter any sound, the sound of Pranava or Om is heard in the heart. It is in fact the very first sound that one is said to hear when he attempts to speak out any word: and in the case of any single sound (Ekaksara) as for instance, the very first sound you would make, or one hears, before you pronounce the letter or
sound, is the Pranava: and you hear this sound so long as one has life or Prana. Of course we cannot ordinarily hear the sound of Pranava unless we are trained in Yoga. Proceeding from this analogy, they inferred, [Page 13] or knew that this sound can be heard everywhere, for, as I said before, any sound that is intended to be produced is always preceded by the sound of Pranava. We thus see the reason why the ancients said that Pranava was the first of all sounds, and therefore of all mantras; how it was held to be universal, and how on this physical plane it came to mean Prana. It also means Brahman, being co-existent with it in being universal: and being thus the first of all sounds every sound or mantra was considered its manifestation.
We shall now proceed to consider the original of mantras. I have already said that sound comes from the Kundalini , through the nadis, and the mouth. Those nadis are hollow and terminate a little below the navel, and through them the ten kinds of air known as Prana; Apana, Vyana, Udana, Samana, Krkara, Devadatta, Dhanamjaya, Naga and Kurma, take their rise.
The sound proceeds from Kundalini to one of the nadls, the particular nadl being determined by the letter intended to be produced. Thus letters A ( ^ ) to Ah ( ^* ) pass through Ida, Ka ( ^) Ma ( H ) through Pingala and Ya (^) to Ksa (^ ) through Susumna. The three nadis are [Page 14] presided over respectively by the Moon, the Sun and Agni; in other words there exists an intimate, and to us inexplicable, relation between these deities, and the nadTs, the former influencing the latter. It is on this account that the sounds coming from Ida are known in Samskrt grammar as Saumya (literally related to Moon) and those from Susumna as Usman meaning hot or fiery. The saumyas are also so called, because
they do not require much effort in pronouncing them as they pass straight through the Ida nadT. The letters Ka to Ma have sprung up from them. Thus, letters Ka to Ma are called Pranins (animated beings) while A to Ah are called Prana (life-principle). They are symbols of the twenty-five tattvas, the last letter Ma symbolising the twenty-fifth principle the JTvatman, or Paramatman according to the view we take. The third series extending from Ya to Ksa, and coming through the Susumna are called Vayapakas, from their being extended, or composed of the other two series already spoken of, and they play a very important part in the composition of mantras, for their insertion is entirely dependent on the result we may wish to obtain.
To summarize then, the sound in its passage from the KundalinT to the end of the nadTs [Page 15] is the stage of para: that of its passage through the nadTs is its pas'yantT stage: from the end of the nadTs to the throat it is in its madhyama stage, while that which passes from the throat to the mouth is its vaikhaff stage. The sounds or letters on the physical plane are divided into those of PrthvT, Ap, Tejas, Vayu and Akas'a.
Thus:
Vayu,— ka, kha, ga, gha, na, a, a, r, ha, s'a, ya.
Agni, — ca, cha, ja, jha, na, i, T, rT, ksa, ra.
PrthvT, — ta, tha, da, dha, na, u, u, l, sa, va, la.
Ap, — ta, tha, da, dha, na, e, ai, IT, sa.
Akas'a, — pa, pha, ba, bha, ma, o, au, am, ah.
Mantras being a combination of sounds to suit a purpose, they may be either of one syllable or a thousand syllables. The latter being its maximum limit, mantras of one, two, and three syllables are, strictly speaking, arrangement of sounds scientifically blended together to produce a result, and are consequently very potent: these and the four syllabled mantras do not generally admit of any analysis whatever, as in the case of those of five syllables and more, for the reason that they are generally composed of the least number of BTjas, and have no room for the insertion [Page 16] of the name of the devata as in the case of the many-worded ones: and the only way we can find out the devata is by a
careful examination of the BTjas employed. Those of five syllables or more, are divisible into (1) the Pranava, (2) the BTja showing the object of the mantra, and (3) the name of the deity. Not all the mantras begin with Pranava, but those that begin with it are considered more sacred to a deity than those which do not begin with it. The reason is plain enough, being that the mere presence of Pranava, which is considered as the mother of all mantras, will accelerate the force of that mantra.
The objects of the Mantras are various
(1) Subjection (vas'ya),
(2) attraction (akarsana),
(3) fascination (mohana),
(4) deadening the faculties (stambhana),
(5) creating enmity (vidvesana),
(6) death (marana),
(7) ruining (uccatana),
(8) soothing ( apyayana) ; and the BTjaic terminations show the object of Mantras.
In case of vas'ya, uccatana, and akarsana, the termination hum should be used; phatfor marana; namah for stambhana, vidvesana and mohana; vausat for apyayana. This rule should be observed by a beginner, but when once he masters a mantra, this act being known as Mantra-siddhi, he masters willpower [Page 17] also, and can then use any termination for fulfilling any object. But immediate results will follow if he also pays attention to the above rule. This leads us to think that only the efficacy of the willpower is necessary, but there is a sort of efficacy in the sounds themselves uttered during the repetition of a mantra.
Mantras are either masculine, feminine, or neuter, according to the nature of the devata addressed to, and of actions. Those addressed to a female deity , are also called vidyas. The eight purposes above mentioned may be thus classified according to the nature of the devata addressed. Those that terminate with the endings hum and phat are male mantras; but there is a class of Indian Occultists who consider every mantra as masculine. Those ending with svaha and vausat are feminine in their action, while those with namah are neuter. Probably the reason for this classification lies in the fact that the pronunciation of hum and phat are more forcible, and produce a greater disturbance in the akas'a, than either svaha, vausat or namah. Under the head of feminine mantras again are included all such mantras of one syllable, but consisting of more than one letter as kma, khma, kra, etc. [Page 18]
One of the advantages of this classification is that these mantras may be best practised by persons enjoying different periods of life; for it is laid down almost as a rule that the feminine mantras should be practised before sixteen years of age, and the rest above that age.
The excellence of the Samskrt alphabet will be apparent when we consider that one had all the occult laws above hinted at, can be observed only in connection with it, and none else; and also that the knowledge of occult dynamics which the ancients possessed, enabled them to find out that these laws can be best worked out in the case of this Alphabet called Samskrt, meaning 'well-done' or 'well- arranged'; in short a perfect Alphabet.
The number of mantras existing in the Samskrt language is generally stated in occult writings as seven crores. This gives us only a rough idea, but the exact number is 67,108,863. Every mantra of any number of syllables must fall under one of the 26 kinds of Chandas, and that the number given out in works on Samskrt prosody. These denote the 26 ways in which different sounds can be arranged, taken one at a time, two at a time, and so on, the total number of ways in which they can be so arranged being, as we [Page 19] know from algebra, 2 26; — 1 or 67,108,863. Mantras are also divided into those of Agni and Soma. If in a mantra there are more letters coming out from Pingala NadT it is Agni mantra; if of Susumna, it belongs to Soma and is called a Saumya mantra; and so on. [Page 20]
SECTION II
OCCULT CORRESPONDENCES
ONE of the most secret correspondences existing between the mantras on the VaikharT Vak or the Sthula plane of matter, and the higher planes is BTjas , which I have partly hinted at in the preceding Section. The central idea involved in the working of the mantras is that certain sounds when uttered produce a disturbance in the Akas'a which is, in its turn communicated, according to the severity of such a disturbance, to the higher planes. It stands to reason, therefore, that the greater the disturbance, the greater will be the communication to the higher planes. The nature of the disturbance cannot be judged from the known laws of physics, as that science has rarely meddled with the higher planes of matter. All that we can, therefore, say is that there exists some relation between sounds, and the disturbance in the Akas'a , and that certain kinds of sounds produce
certain kinds of disturbance. These sounds are known in Samskrt [Page 21] by the name of BTjaksaras, and they have been classed under various heads, denoting those the effects of which are of a particular nature; the latent forces in the letters being known as BTjas. All the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet are also BTjaksaras, and as everything in nature can be judged from the three standpoints of Visnu, S'iva and S'akti, we have also three different sets of meanings according as they are either Vaisnava, S'aiva and S'akta. Thus there are three ways of interpreting a mantra, composed as it is of various BTjaksaras, and according as it belongs to either Visnu, S'iva or S'akti. It must at the same time be said that each one of these devatas, is an aggregate of several forces, each known in its turn by the name of devata; and one can easily see by inspection, what particular force is intended to be invoked in a given mantra. These ideas should be borne in mind for a correct understanding of what follows.
A chart is given at the end, as an appendix, containing the significations of the BTja forces latent in the 50 letters of the Samskrt Alphabet; as such a thing will be too tedious if it finds a place in the body of the essay. It has been prepared at the expense of, a good deal of labour, as it involved the study of [Page 22] more than seven or eight large Samhitas; in the three sets of Agamas, — Pancaratra, S'aiva and S'akta. A very curious conventionality is found to have been used in the Agamas, viz., of designating BTjaksaras, by the names of certain trees; as for example, “Join Mandara with Visnu”. Here “Mandara” would be ordinarily understood to mean the Mandara tree but such an
explanation will be found not to have been borne by the context. It means that the BTjaksaras called “ra” should be added to Visnu BTjaksaras ' a', and should be pronounced “ara”. This is given here as an illustration to show how the mere wording of the text of Mantras'astras is apt to be misunderstood, and why such a thing as initiation into them is necessary. Such sorts of examples have collected and explained as far as the materials could be obtained, and will also be found in the appendix. This sort of finding out the mantras is called Mantroddhara. Among the uses of BTjaksaras, may be mentioned the placing of certain BTjaksaras in the beginning of the verses composed. A poet, for instance,
and in this case he must be a good adept, wishing to destroy a house or anything belonging to another person, sings a song beginning with one of the Agni or fire BTjaksaras and [Page 23] which means that the house should be burnt. Cases of this sort have occurred, but they all depend on the occult powers conquered by the composer. Kalidasa and several others are said to have done so. Similarly good may be done to anyone. But as the tendency in those who are not Brahmajnanins, is to do more harm than good, such things should be discountenanced as far as possible.
It must, therefore, be understood that all the mantras which may mean nothing else than the effect required, are not devoid of force whatever. A magician, for instance, wishing to purify the magnetic aura of a chair would merely say “Ram agnaye namah” fancying or willing himself during the repetition, that fire purifies the chair, and if he is sensitive, he would feel that the aura surrounding it has been purified.
As regards the question of relation of mantra, to the force it symbolises, no clear words can be found in the Mantras'astras. Such explanations as when literally translated mean “the devata is of two forms, viz., that of a mantra, and that of the Suksma S'arTra”, occur, but they do not in any way enlighten us. There seems to be a good deal of mystery cast on this question by the Agamas, but judging from their [Page 24] context in the Mantras'astras and from S'amkaracarya 's words in his famous Commentaries on the
Brahma Sutras (1.3. 33) that a devata has the power of assuming any form. I think I am not far from right in supposing that the devatas (by whatever name they are called in the Theosophical literature) are denizens of a higher plane of being, but between whom and the sounds there exists some inexplicable relation, and which when once tuned is sure to invoke those denizens, just as in a piano the keys produce the particular tone required.
Similar cases of intentional secrecy in the case of mantras may be inferred from the fact that the mantras have been specially composed so as not to be of much use when practised as they stand. The mantras are “defective” as they stand, and should be remedied. They are said to be of fifty kinds. Most of these are trivial, but four of these are important. They are known by the names, Chinna, Ruddha, S’aktihTna and Badhira.
Chinna means ' broken' and denotes that defect by which a mantra is known, containing a Vayu BTjaksara (ya) either in the beginning, middle or the end, or containing a double letter (as kma for instance): or containing three, four or five vowels. [Page 25]
Ruddha (retarding) is that defect in which a PrthvTbTja ( la ) occurs twice simultaneously. S’aktihTna (powerless) is that in which neither a MayabTja ( T) S'ribTja ( S’ffm ), or Pranava, is to be found in a given mantra. Badhira (or deaf) is that in which there is anusvara both in the beginning as well as the end of a mantra.
It is also considered a defect in a mantra, if it is composed of a large number of syllables. It quite frequently happens that a mantra cannot be formed without any of the defects: and accordingly there are two opposite schools, one holding that these defects exist with a purpose, and the other that they are only accidental. It follows therefrom that in order to compose, a mantra, a good deal of care has to be exercised against positive evil consequences, as such defects are sure to produce little or none of the intended results. It will also be seen that those mantras which are either the least defective or not defective at all, are those composed by the highest adepts spoken of in Samskrt writings, and I may add that they are, as a rule, written in Agamas in a cypher, thus necessitating a real initiation into it.
These defects should be remedied, and such remedies are ten in number known by the name [Page 26] of “Das'a Samskaras”. They are Janana, JTvana; Tadana, Bodhana, Abhiseka, VimalTkarana, Apyayana, Tarpana, DTpana and Gopana. Janana, literally “birth”, is the process of separating the letters of a mantra from a diagram previously drawn, and of concentrating the will thereon; this process is said to intensify the action of a mantra. JTvana or “protection” is the process of regenerating, and this is done by performing the Japa of a mantra, preceded and followed by the Pranava.
Tadana (beating) is that process of writing the mantra on the bhurjapatra (birch leaf), and after concentrating one's mind on it for a certain length of time, invoking in short the force indicated by the mantra: and then awakening it by making some magnetic passes on the writing, with a drug favourable for awakening the force, such as sandal paste.
Bodhana is that process in which the devata is after being roused induced to a proper understanding; and this peculiar result is brought about by the throwing of the flowers of KaravTra (Neriumadorata). In Abhiseka, the devata is made to yield to the wishes of the operator, and this is done by either pouring water mesmerised by the repetition of the four [Page 27] bTjas Om, HrTm, KlTm, Aim, or by throwing the tender leaves of the peepul.
While the processes above described are for the purpose of restoring the devata to its proper senses so far as the individual operator is concerned, the defects in the mantra, and the devata are, strictly speaking, remedied in the last three ones, beginning from VimalTkarana, which literally means “getting rid of strain”, It is done by making a Japa of the mantra, preceded, and followed, by the words Hamsa and Soham, respectively, and then mesmerising water by plunging a blade of sacred grass into it, while the mantra is being repeated; this letter process being known by the name of Apyayana, that is equalizing the good and evil actions of the devata. To attain this result another ceremony is gone through, viz., Tarpana, which is pouring over the bhurjapatra on which the mantra is written, mesmerised milk, and clarified butter, mixed with ghee and the mesmerised water just described. The next step, therefore, is that of stimulating the devata, so that the required result, viz., a command over it, may be sooner accomplished. This is done by DTpana, and Gopana. In the former the BTjas (Om, Im, Sam ) are added to the mantra and repeated [Page 28] a certain number of times; the BTjas added thereto, being very powerful ones; and the letter is nothing but a careful preservation to oneself of the secret ceremonies performed all the while.
There is however one important thing. I would call it the most important factor in the practice of mantras and that is, the law of correspondences of several principles to each other. I need not for obvious reasons set myself to explain them in any way but would leave the subject to be dealt with by my readers according to the lights they have had. But as I expended a great labour in finding them out from the Mantras'astras and other writings, I shall simply enumerate them in an appendix hereafter. [Page 29]
SECTION III
PURAS'CARANA
PURAS'CARANA as applied to the practice of mantras means that act or a series of acts which should be performed as soon as one is initiated. They are japa, homa, tarpana, marjana, and charity. These are called the five angas to the practice of mantra.
Before one begins to practise it, it is absolutely necessary that he should find out whether he will In any way be benefited, in other words, whether his Karma is such as to prevent his being benefited at all by the practice of a mantra in that birth in which he wishes to obtain the result in view. This shows that nothing in the world can work against the natural law known to Hindus under the general name of
“Karma”. Even Vidyaranya when he wanted wealth and prosperity had recourse to the practice of Gayattri, but it was all of no use. He at last, performed those ceremonies which go to destroy the action of the devata of a mantra after it is found useless. This action of Vidyaranya's certainly evoked at last the [Page 30] devata of the Gayattri, who is said to have told him that he could not obtain the required result in that birth, as his Karma in his previous birth was such as not to entitle him to any such reward. He, therefore, renounced the life of a householder and turned out a Samnyasin, as the life of an ascetic is considered by the S'astras as a kind of second birth, in which one should try his
best to forget everything he previously enjoyed, and even his own name: for this purpose, Hindus take a new name after they renounce a house-holder's duties. It was only after Vidyaranya became a Samnyasin that he was appointed Prime Minister to the King, and was virtually rolling in wealth. We need not question the basis on which the above account stands. It is quite sufficient for our present purpose to see, that granting it to be true, it conveys a good deal of meaning; it illustrates in short the law enunciated above.
For purposes of finding out whether Karma allows one to be benefited by the practice of a mantra, recourse should be had to Astrology , from which it should be found out whether at the particular period in which work is commenced or during his life-time he may have control over the mantra in [Page 31] question. If it is found out from his horoscope that he would control it, he may set himself to work, but not; if otherwise. Granting that it is in his favour, he should then solve the same problem by having recourse to the mantra itself. The object of this problem is to find out whether one should perform the Japa, etc., of a mantra a greater number of times or a less number of times than is usually
accorded to it, in short, to see whether he had, in his past birth practised it, and with what result. For, if he had practised it, and he had a command over it, he would now be required to do it a less number of times, but still at the same time he will derive the fullest benefit; therefrom. This is technically called Rnarnibhava, and, is of three kinds. In all of these three, the general process is counting in a sort of way from the first letter of a mantra to the first or the last letter of his own name. One of these ways is to find out, in the order of the Samskrt Alphabet, how many letters come between the first letter of the mantra, and the first letter of the name of the intending practiser; then multiply this number by 3, and divide by 7, and the remainder will be what the mantra “owes” him. [Page 32]
Then count from the first letter of the name of the practiser, to the first letter of the mantra, multiply this number by 7, and divide the product by three, the remainder is what he owes the mantra. To explain this let me take an illustration. Suppose the first letter of a mantra is and suppose at the same time that the first letter of the name of the intending practiser when transliterated into Samskrt is H. Counting from to H we have three letters, multiplying this number by three and dividing by seven, we have remainder 2. This shows that the mantra owes him two parts. Then continuing the same illustration, count from to ^ , we have 49 letters; multiplying this by seven, and dividing
the product by three, we have the remainder 1. Adding 1 and 2 we have a total three, and this means that the person whose name begins with ^should, in case of practising a mantra beginning with , perform Japa and other ceremonies over again half the number of times the number generally laid down for them. The other method is drawing a figure of 63 squares. In the top-most row the first 9 numerals should be written in the ascending order, and in the lower-most, the same in the [Page 33] descending order. In the tO M five intermediate rows, all the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet from should be written in their natural order, omitting as in the diagram given below.
Here again let us suppose that the mantra intended to be practised begins with and the first letter of the intending practiser's name is H ; and counting from to H we have three letters. The top-most row of figures denote those relating to the mantra, while the lower-most are those relating to the person. Such being the case, we should, in order to find out by how [Page 34] much the mantra “is due”, multiply the number three by four, that being the figure which is right above the first letter of the mantra, and we obtain the product twelve. Dividing this product by six, that being the figure straight below it in the lower most row, we have no remainder, and this means that the mantra is in no way “due to” the person. If the same process is reversed and the necessary arithmetical trial operations undergone; we have a remainder 2. This shows that the performer should perform the Japa of a mantra twice the number of times usually allotted to it.
There is a third method which consists in certain arithmetical operations with regard to the total numbers of letters of the mantra, and the person. But as this is very tedious, and I run the risk of making this already technical subject all the more tedious, I shall for the present omit it. Those who are anxious to know something about it will find it described in greater detail in Mantraratnamahodadhi.
I have been using all the while, the expressions “due to mantra”, and “due by mantra”. These were intended to mean the relations which exist in nature between the person, and the devata of the mantra. While his horoscope reveals the relation of the individual to the [Page 35] practice of mantras in general, the above methods refer entirely to the devatas presiding over individual mantras, and the person who intends to practise them.
There are again other methods such as Sidharicakras or squares in which the letters of the Samskrt Alphabet are arranged in particulars, and thus the relation of the devata of the mantra to the individual is traced, but I now omit them for want of space. By the aid of these methods, one is enabled, to find out what sort of mantras will benefit him. He then, finds out what sort of relation exists between himself and the devata as judged by the constellation under which he was born, and the elements surrounding him, and thereby the powers presiding over those elements.
The next thing to be done is the selection of a good day for the purpose, but before this comes the initiation into the mantra itself by a competent Guru, who should have a complete control over the devata of the mantra, which is known in Mantras'astras as Mantrasiddhi. The Guru should on the day of initiation worship the devata of the mantra, by concentrating the force denoted by the mantra in a pot, already filled with water and in which the five best gems, viz., diamond, ruby, sapphire, [Page 36] emerald and cat's-eye are placed. The Guru should then make in the presence of the disciple, 100 offerings to fire by ghee generally, although special oils are considered favourable in the case of special mantras. He should then fill another small vessel with water and after covering it with the palm of his right hand, the Guru should repeat the mantra 800 times, and bathe the candidate with the water; the vessel should then be placed aside and the mantra pronounced in his ear. This completes initiation, and a portion of the force generated in the Guru by his control over the devata of the mantra he is to initiate into, is thus transformed by the same method as we find in the case of modern mesmerists: and you thus see that as has been frequently and truly remarked by our President-Founder mesmeric methods of mahipulation form the A. B. C. of all occult practices.
It is now the turn of the disciple to practise the mantra. Special months are selected for the purpose. The month of Vais'akha (May-June) is very favourable, to the production of early results, so also are As'vina, and Karttika months (October-November, and November-December); of a more doubtful nature are those of Phalguna (March - April), Margas'ira [Page 37] (December - January), Jyestha (June); less beneficial still are Asadha (July), S'ravana (August - September), and Magha (February); while the remaining months should always be avoided. The full-moon day, the second, fifth to seventh, the tenth, the twelfth, and the thirteenth days are good ones. The Moon being more connected with these matters, any mantra practised during these days in that half of waxing Moon will be productive of worldly comforts; but if on the corresponding days of the waning Moon, it will be more productive of spiritual bliss. The other days, unless in special cases, should be entirely avoided. Special periods again, such as the sixth day of either of the halves in the month of Bhadrapada (September - October), the thirteenth day of the waning half in the month of As'vina (October - November), the ninth day of the bright half of Karttika (November - December), the first day of the dark-half of S'ravana (August - September) are held to be very sacred. They are in fact called Devaparvans, days sacred to the devas. Of the days of the week, Tuesday is attended with loss, Saturday with death, and Monday in the dark-half of a month with no use; the rest are good ones. Of the constellations As'vinT, RohinT, Hasta, Svati, Vis'akha, Jyestha, Uttarasadha.
Uttarabhadra, [Page 38] and UttaraphalgunT are the best. If the day is an eclipse day, none of these need be observed. A mantra should be remedied of the various defects mentioned in the foregoing section, and the “ten arts” also therein referred to should be performed.
One should fast the day previous to the day of practice, probably to enable him to concentrate his attention better on the mantra. On the day fixed, he should resolve within himself not to leave the place or village in which he is put up, until the practice is over, as, also to avoid sexual intercourse, oil bath, studying other subjects, vain talk, midday meal, etc., abstinence from all of which tend to improve the psychical part of the person, and to enable him to concentrate his attention better. Until this practice is over, he should rise early in the mornings and perform all the duties involved upon him. The next thing to be done is the ordinary puja or worship, but done as a special accompaniment to his practice. He should then draw the figure of a tortoise, in which should be written the various letters of the Samskrt Alphabet in a certain way; and on that part of the figure where the head is drawn he should take his seat. The following is the figure: [Page 39]
[Page 40] The number of times a mantra should be repeated is regulated as regards each. The best way is by counting the fingers, although beads are also recommended, but not quite necessary. Out of the number of times one repeats his mantra in Japa, he should make one-tenth the number to each of the following: homa (offerings), tarpana, marjana, bathing and food to Brahmanas. This last, and in fact all the essentials, are necessary only in the case of the more powerful mantras, but not for the lesser ones, such as the inferior devatas. As for the substances required for homa, palas'a flower (Butea frondosa) is necessary, if the object is to obtain knowledge; if for Brahma - tejas, or increasing his aura, As'vattha branches; if for increase of age, darbha (the common grass); if anxious of sovereignty, cooked rice and ghee exclusively; cracked rice will bring success in love; bilva leaves bring on fame; Putran3jTvi seeds will induce fertility; if sesamum seeds are used, the cure of sickness results; and if flowers of any kind, prosperity.
For Tarpana, a little quantity of milk and ghee may be mixed with water, and the mixture let down through the fingers, each time the mantra is repeated the particular [Page 41] mantra being followed by the word “Svaha”, while being so repeated.
Marjana is the sprinkling oneself by water while a mantra is being repeated. A pot or vessel is filled with water mixed with a little milk while the practiser takes a blade of darbha grass and by it sprinkles on his head the water in the vessel, invoking mentally the devata of the mantra. In feeding Brahmanas he should similarly invoke the devata in each individual Brahmana thus fed.
He should take his meals in the evening, eating just sufficient to keep his body and soul together; and all sorts of rich food should be altogether avoided. After all this is performed for the number of days fixed for each mantra, he is said to have obtained that power of controlling the devata of the mantra, this state being known as mantra-siddhi, presentiments of which will be found in dreams. It is only after one becomes a complete master of a mantra, that he can have recourse to any of the eight actions spoken of in the first section.
I cannot but conclude this section with a warning to one and all of our brothers and sisters not to be led away by what I have here given out and set themselves to practise. [Page 42] These are general rules no doubt applicable to most of the mantras, but care must be taken to see if the particular mantra you wish to practise has any special mode of performance laid down in Mantras'astras. I need not touch the question of knowing it through a proper Guru, for certain evil effects resulting from any unintentional omission in any of the ceremonies above described can only be best averted by one, who has had a practical experience, and such a person is the Guru. [Page 43]
SECTION IV
NATURE AND TEACHINGS OF THE TANTRAS
THE Tantras or Agamas [The terms Tantra and Agama are here loosely used. The expression. ‘Tantra' has been said in the Kamikagama, to apply to, that work which speaks of the twenty-four subjects, viz.,
(1) the nature of Brahman, (2) Brahma- Vidya the science of knowing Brahman, (3) The names of the Agamas and Tantras. (4) Creation and destruction of the world, (5) Astronomy, (6) The sixteen mystical diagrams called Cakras which are auxiliary to the practice of mantras. (7) Mantras, (8) on the uses of Mantras, (9) Yantras. (10) Worship of the special deity about whom the work treats, (11)The ways of people in the four yugas, (12) Origin of devas, (13) Creation and destruction of universe, (14) Holy rivers; (15) Duties of different castes, (16) Old traditions, (17) Sacred days in a year, (18) Pure and impure objects, (19) Elements in nature, (20) Secret virtues of herbs, (21) Elements in nature, etc..
Agama is defined to be that which contains only the following, viz., (1) creation; (2) destruction of the universe; (3) nature and use of mantras; (4) nature and worship of devas.
The words Tantra and Agama are, however, generally used as synonyms. It is noteworthy that Amarasimha used the words ‘Agama' and ‘Tantra 'in different significations. But this is no reason why the writings should call themselves by either of these names may not be more ancient than Amarasimha.
The term Yamala is also used as a synonym. It should treat of subjects
(1) creation of the universe;
(2) astronomy; (3) daily duties;
(4) difference of caste;
(5) Yugas and their nature (S'abdakalpadruma)] which I have explained in the beginning of this paper as the great storehouse of mantras are of three classes:
(1) Pancaratragamas, or those which speak of the worship of Visnu; (2) S'aivagamas or those which deal with the worship of S'iva; and (3) S'aktagamas, those of S'akti. The first [Page 44] are in 108 samhitas or texts promulgated by seven Rsis [ The term Rsi is used in its literal sense “See-er” or promulgator. Hence Brahma and some others who are not Rsis in the general sense of the term are here so called ] — Brahma, S'iva, Skanda, Gautama, Vasistha, Narada and Kapila. Thus seven schools were formed; but 101 others subsequently taught the doctrine, and this accounts for there being 108 samhitas. They are as given below with the number of their S'lokas opposite to them:
[ The following marked t can be found. For those marked a the authors are unknown. The numbers in case where the sign ? is affixed are not quite correct. In the case of Padmasamhita, one in 1,00,000, is said to exist in the house of a devaloka in Conjeeveram, but I have not seen it. The one I now use is of 10,000 Slokas. It is now being printed in Madras]
(1) Padmasamhita t 10,000;
(2) Padmodbhava t1,00,000;
(3) Mayavaibhava or Trailokyamohana;
(4) Nalakubara 5,000;
(5) Parama 1,500; t
(6) Narada 4,000;
(7) Kanva 7,000;
(8) Visnu-tilaka 750 (?);
(9) Sanaka 1,500;
(10) Arjuna;
(11) Vasistha 4,500;
(12) Pauskara 4,000 (?);
(13) Sanatkumara 1,000;
(14) Satya 1,000;
(15) S'rTdhara and
(16) Sananda 750;
(17) MahT-pras'na;
(18) Ts'vara 500,
(19) LaksmT -Tantra or S'rT Pras'na, dialogue between Indra and LaksmT 4,000;
(20) Mahendra 2,000;
(21) Purusottama 1,000 (?);
(22) Pancapras'na; [Page 45]
(23) Kanva;
(24) Mula;
(25) Tatvasagara;
(26) VagTs'a;
(27) Samvarta 1,000;
(28) Sattvata t250; (29)
Tejodravina a;
(30) Visu Sadbhava;
(31) Visnu tattva a;
(32) Visnu:Siddhanta a;
(33) Visnu-vaibhava a;
(34) Visnu-rahasya;
(35 ) Kaumara t 250;
(36) Jaya 500;
(37) Saura a 150;
(38) Bhagavata 150;
(39) S'aunaka t200;
(40) Pusti Tantra a;
(41) Madhura;
(42) Upendra;
(43) Yogahrdaya;
(44) MarTci 100;
(45) HarTta t 700;
(46) Atreya t 250;
(47) Parames'vara t 200;
(48) Daksa 150;
(49) Aus'anasa 250 ;
(50) Vaikhanasa 1,000;
(51) Vihagendra 500;
(52) Visvaksena t 250;
(53) Yajnavalkya 250;
(54) Bhargava 200;
(55) Jamadagnya 150;
(56) Paramapurusa 150;
(57) Gautama 750;
(58) Pulastya 150;
(59) S'akala 200;
(60) Jnanarnava 150;
(61) Yamya 100;
(62) Narayana 150;
(63) JTyottara 100;
(64) Jabali 100;
(65) Paras'ara 100;
(66) Kapila 250;
(67) Vamana 250;
(68) Barhaspatya 700 (?) ;
(69) Pracetasa; (70) ValmTka;
(71) KatyayanTya 250;
(72) Agastya 500;
(73) Jaimini 200;
(74) Aupagayana;
(75) Hiranyagarbha;
(76) Bodhayana 1,000;
(77) Bharadvaja t 500;
(78) Narasimha;
(79) Kas'yapa t l,500;
(80) Saumya;
(81) Uttaragargya;
(82) S'atatapa;
(83) Angirasa;
(84) Yoga 200;
(85) Trailokyavijaya, or, Bharata, 200;
(86) Pingala;
(87) Vitta 150; [Page 46]
88) Varuna 150;
(89) Krsnacamara;
(90) Vayavya;
(91) Markandeya t;
(92) Agneya 500;
(93) Samhitasamgraha;
(94) Mahasanat-kumara;
(95) Vyasa;
(96) Visnu 300;
(97) Umamahes'vara t 1,500 (?);
(98) Mihira;
(99) Ahirbudhnya 750;
(100) Raghava 350 (?);
(101) Kalki 250;
(102) Dattatreya 500;
(103) S'arva;
(104) Samskarsana 1,500;
(105) Pradyumna;
(106) Varaha;
(107) S'uka;
(108) Kapinjala 2,500.—
These writings amount to 400,000, [ The above number is not quite correct; for works that are generally said to be of, say, 250 s'lokas are sometimes found to be an abridgment of a larger work of the same name, and this difficulty is experienced on account of many of the Samhitas being lost. But these remarks do not apply to S'ivagamas for most of the complete sets of the 28 works, I have seen or heard contain the exact number of s'lokas mentioned opposite them in the list given below. Special care should, therefore, be
always taken to distinguish abridgments from real Samhitas] — S'lokas. Only those that are marked with t are to be found now-a-days, in the various public and private libraries in India, and elsewhere, as catalogued by the several scholars. From the Pancaratraraksa of Vedantacarya written six centuries ago, we learn that several of these could not be obtained in his days. Most of these, are, however, referred to and even [Page 47] quoted in the writings of Vis'istadvaitins who lived from about the 10th Century down to the present day. Of the 108 text books, the first two are the most important and are generally considered to contain all the more important matters in these writings. Of the
remainder, LaksmT Tantra, Bharata, Ahirbudhnya, and Sattvata Samhitas, are very often spoken of as teaching a system of spirit-communion (S’aranagatT ) which bears a very close resemblance to that practised by the initiates of the Grecian mysteries of old. With very few exceptions like Narada Samhita which is divided into chapters; these writings are generally of four parts or padas, viz., Jnanapada; Yogapada, Kriyapada, and Caryapada.
This order is sometimes reversed in some of them and there are others again in which Caryapada alone is dealt with. Their origin according to Mahabharta is given below in an abridged form (S'antiparvan Moksadharma Parvan):
Narada in his wanderings met Narayana Rsi at Badarikas'rama [ Badrinath in the Himalayas. He is an incarnation of Visnu, and taught several mantras. There is, however, another Rsi of the same name who is the author of a code of laws, and referred to by Madhavacarya in his commentary on Paras'ara Smrti ] — and put to him several [Page 48] questions on philosophy and on the origin of the cosmos. The Rsi replied that Brahma was first created and He created the devas, and the Rsis, Atri, Bhrgu, Kutsa, Vasistha, Gautama,
Kas'yapa, Angirasa and MarTci. The doctrines promulgated by them were followed in the Krta Yuga. One of them, Uparicaravas by name, performed a sacrifice in the presence of the abovementioned and several others, with Brhaspati, officiating as priest. The other Rsis assembled soon found that the oblations given by Uparicaravas disappeared, without being received by the Devas as was usually the case. Brhaspati accused him of dishonest motives and offered, to perform the Yajna himself. He then found to his astonishment the disappearance of the oblations, and therefore enquired of the performer as to the reason of such a disappearance.
Uparicarav replied that Narayana received them. The Devas were very much enraged and asked the Rsis to explain how it was that Narayana could be seen by none of them. The Rsi explained by saying that as they were the mind-born sons of Brahma, they alone could see Narayana face to face. They further said that once upon a time they went to S'vetadvTpa to see him. They could see him [Page 49] only after performing a tapas there for a long time.
Narada hearing this went to S'vetadvTpa near the Mount Meru, and performed a long tapas there and saw Narayana. The latter taught him the great secret that the easiest way of worshipping Him was by means of idols.
Such is the origin of the Pancaratra Agamas subsequently presented to the world by Narada, then by six other Rsis and afterwards by several others.
Pancaratra Agamas are so called, because the five kinds of knowledge (Ratra) are taught; viz., (1) general knowledge of realities; (2) knowledge of that by which one will be able to reach the highest goal; (3) knowledge of that by which one will be able to serve Narayana in Vaikuntha; (4) knowledge of that by which one will get, the eight Siddhis; (5) knowledge of the means by which wealth, children, etc., can be obtained. There are also several ways of explaining the expression, but in none of the works, so far as I have seen, is the meaning given out to be “nights” as explained by M. Barth in his “Religions of India”.[ It is further explained in the Padma-Samhita of Pancaratra Agamas that Siddhantas are so called, because they treat of positive knowledge leading to Narayana and best practised by those who are well-versed in the Vedas, and the S'astras such as PurvamTmamsa, etc..] [Page 50]
But this expression is not to be found in any of the works themselves. They call themselves either as Siddbantas (definite conclusions) or Tantras (easy way of doing things) in contradistinction to Mantras, and are so called on account of their containing more of the easier ways of accomplishing things, than by Mantras.
These writings, S'aiva and S'aktagamas included, are further divided into
(1) Mantra Siddhantas, those that speak of the Murti, or form of worship in a temple;
(2) Agama Siddhantas, of four murtis or forms;
(4) Tantrantara Siddhanta of three or four-faced forms or idols, whether of Visnu or S'iva.
These differences arose on account of the particular symbols adopted; and of the Mantra uttered when they are made. The Padmasamhita, for instance, is a Mantra Siddhanta, and it is supposed to have been composed in fifteen millions of s'lokas by Narayana himself, and taught to Brahma, the composer saying that although the true mode of worshipping Him was as described in the Vedas, but that if any easier method was necessary it was by Mantras. Brahma is then said to have condensed it into 500,000 s'lokas and taught it to [Page 51] Kapila Rsi, who in his turn abridged it into 100,000 s'lokas, and initiated Padma, an elephant in Patalaloka, into its mysteries. The Samhita is therefore named after
the elephant. The elephant again abridged [The dialogue in Padmasamhita is, however, between Visnu and Brahma] — it into 10,000 s'lokas. Samvarta learnt it from Padma and taught it to the world. Kanva was one in the long line of teachers; and the work is strictly speaking that of Kanva and other Rsis. These, as well as S'aivagamas, are divided into Jnana [Jnanayoga —The contemplation described in the Yoga- s'astras with its eight parts, yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dhyana, dharana, and samadhi ] — Yoga,
Kriya, and Carya padas, or rather sections treating respectively of the nature of Brahmajnana from the Vis'istadvaitic and Advaitic standpoints, adopting the teachings and even the technicalities of the Upanisads of Yoga or the practice of Brahmajnana and its four kinds Jnanayoga, Karmayoga, [[[Wikipedia:Karma yoga|Karmayoga]] is the performance of one's duties, moral and religious, and without any selfinterest in the result after obtaining a knowledge of the realities (Cit, Acit and Ts'vara.) through the Scriptures, and always contemplating it with various kinds of Karma (Vide the S'rT Bhasya of Ramanujacarya, Adhyaya 3, pada 3 ]— and Bhaktiyoga. [ Bhaktiyoga. — This is also called upasana. It is the contemplation of the Brahman with its various qualities, and attributes, without any interruption whatever, throughout one's whole life; at the same time discharging his duties to the best of his ability ] — The last forms the principal [Page 52] subject of this work and is considered easier than either the Jnana or Karmayogas, and is therefore recommended to those
who are desirous of obtaining Moksa, but unable to practise the various ways leading to it. It treats in the Kriyapada, of the construction of temples and their different modes, and also of the modelling of idols; and lastly of the various ways of worshipping the idols thus prepared, treating of course of the various Mantras, Vaisnava or S'aiva as the case may be, and other topics such as the principles of Vaisnava mantras, their nature and uses, the secret virtues of herbs, etc.. The philosophy of these Agamas leans more towards Advaita than anything else, and although this four-fold division is not to be found in some of them, still all of them, after a short introduction, take up the question of Carya or the mode of worship of idols.
The above remarks apply as well to S'aivagammas, of which there are twenty-eight, with the only difference that in the case of S'aivagamas the word S'iva must be substituted for Narayana.
The names of the twenty-eight are given below.
(1) Kamika — 125,000;
(2) Samtana 50,000;
(3) S'arva;
(4) Kirana;
(5) Suksma;
(6)Yogaja;
(7) DTpta;
(8) Cinta;
(9) Karana; [Page 53]
(10) Ancita (agita);
(11) Vijaya (jaya);
(12) VTra; (13) Vis'va;
(14) Ams'umat;
(15) Svayambhuva;
(16) NTla (anala);
(17) Siddha (Sarvottama);
(18) Suprabheda (Bheda);
(19) Raurava;
(20) Makuta;
(21) Bimba;
(22) Vimala;
(23) Lohita;
(24) Sahasra (Nis'vasa);
(25) Parames'vara;
(26) Prodga;
(27) Candrajnana;
(28) Vatula (Nis'vasa) 100,000.
These are generally of the form of a dialogue between S'iva and his consort ParvatT. She always begins “What are the most interesting secrets in the world ? ” and the luxurious husband relates all that she wants. The first twenty are given out from his four faces, Aghora, Tatpurusa, Vamana and Sadyojata, at the rate of five Samhitas from each face. The remaining eight were taught when he assumed that terrible aspect called Ts'ana. [ Five more Samhitas viz.. S'uka, Vasistha, S'ais'aka, Sanandana, Sanatkumara, works subsequently written and attributed to S'iva, each of which is said to contain about. 30,000 s'lokas. but not having seen any of them nothing definite can be said about them. They are however said to treat of the different kinds of Yoga ] — The arrangement is the same as in the Pancaratra in being divided into Jnana, Yoga, Kriya and Carya-padas, treating of the worship of S'iva. in the form of idols and analogous to that of Visnu; there being,however, some exceptions. [Page 54]
The S'aktagamas begin in the same strain as S'aivagamas, ParvatT questioning S'iva as to the best way of worshipping and knowing her real nature. It is then told that she has sixty-four aspects. Each of them is dealt with in one of the 64 Samhitas of the S'aktagamas . In these Tantras as in the Pancaratra and S'aivagamas, the Vedas are highly spoken of as a rule, and the Vedic methods approved. But in Kalivuga when people have a predominant tendency towards worldly pleasures, the worship of S'akti is recommended as the easiest way of obtaining happiness.
If however, one should worship her with no other desire ( Niskama Karma) than of obtaining moksa, he will either obtain moksa at the end of this life-time or in his next, but that depends on the nature of the
Karma he has done which may lead him from birth to birth. All these ideas are decidedly Vedantic, but even in such writings as Jnanarnava, and Kaularnava Tantra, the goal is not
lost sight of, and the importance of the Vedas not forgotten; and the S'akta worshipper is enjoined to attend, to the regular duties of caste. Unfortunately, however, this matter is mis-represented by European writers, and even to a certain extent by the Indian writers [Page 55] themselves, who with a prejudiced mind, and after going through a portion of these Tantras and seeing the depravity of morals as shown by that portion of the work, jump at once to the conclusion that the Tantras, in general, and the S'akta
Tantras in particular are opposed to the Vedas; but forget that in the very Samhitas they have gone through, the Vedic duties are spoken of highly and the importance of obtaining moksa described. In an such cases, therefore, a careful study should be made of two or more Samhitas and then a calm judgement should be given. The practices of S'aktas are no doubt indecent, but that is not the end or aim of the S'aktagamas. For instance, this point has been argued, and the same conclusions, arrived at in the 1st Ullasa of Kaularnava Tantra and the Mahanirvana Tantra. This view is also taken in the Rudrayamala, PhetkarinT, and several other Tantras inculcating S'akti worship. The writer is no sectarian follower of S'aktas, but while he abhors the moral depravity exhibited in them his individual conclusions are based on a study of more than five Tantras selected specially for the study of the different aspects of S'akti worship.
The sixty-four S'aktagamas are as follow: [Page 56]
1. Mahamaya S'ambara explains the formation of the universe and of illusions.
2. YoginT Jala S'ambara speaks of the illusion caused by YoginTs, a certain class of Devatas which one will conquer over only by certain practices in the burial ground.
3 & 4. Tattva S'ambara, of command over the elements; and Mahendrajala Tantra, of showing water in air, in earth, etc..
5 to 12. Asta Bhairava: Siddha, Vatuka, Badabanala, Kaa, Kalagni, YoginT, Maha and S'akti Tantras. They treat of the eight Siddhis (Animan, etc..).
13 to 20. Bahurupastaka: these treat of the worship of BrahmT, Mahes'varT, KaumarT, VaisnavT, VarahT, MahendrT, CamundT, S'ivadutT The most important subject therein touched S'rTvidya which is one of the highest of occult methods.
21 to 28. Yamalastaka treat of the worship of DevT; they are Vedantic and highly esoteric in their nature.
29. Candrajnana (NityasodasT Tantra) speaks of Kapali worship.
30. MalinT treats of diseases and their cure.
31. MahasaIpmohana. Making a waking man sleep, e.g., by means of black art, such as the cutting of children's tongues. [Page 57]
32. Vamajusta.
33. Vamadeva.
34. Vatula. etc..
35. Vatulottara
36. Kamika.
[Items 34 to 36 deals with Erection of temples, etc.. These should not be confounded with the S'aivagamas of the same name]
37. Hrdbheda Kapalika, speaks of taking and placing of Hrtkamala in Brahmarandhra.
38. Tantrabheda — killing of men by mantras, fascination, etc.
39. Guhya.
40. Kalavada — speaks of Kalas of every kind.
41. Kalasara — Vamacara or left-hand worship
42. Kundikamata of gulika or certain secret herbal preparations.
43. Matottara. On mercurial preparations, alchemy, etc.
44. VTna. — This is the name of a YoginT; and the Samhita treats of the different ways of conquering her, she being also (called Sambhoga YaksinT).
45. Trottala speaks of Gulika, Anjana, and Paduka.
46. Trottalottara winning over the 64,000 YaksinTs. [Page 58]
47. Pancamrta; of the ways of preventing death.
48 to 51. Rupabhedaka, or Bhutoddamara, Kulasara, KulodTs'a, Kulacudamani — teach of the different ways of killing a man or Vamacara methods. [ 52 to 56 deals Of Kapalika worship]
52 Sarvajnanottara,
53 MahakalT - Mata,
54 Arunes'a,
55 ModinTs'a,
56 Vikunthes'vara,
[ 57 to 64 deals with The doctrines of the Digambara]
58 Pas'cima Tantra,
59 Daksina Tantra,
60 Uttara Tantra,
62 Vimala,
63 Vimalottara,
64 DevTmata.
The existing works on Mantras are mostly compilations and abstract of one or more of these 200 Samhitas. Their number may be estimated at not less than a thousand in Southern India, and it is not possible to say how many that were formerly written, are now lost. To this class belong works, such as Mantramahodadhi, Tantrasara, Saradatilaka, [Page 59] Prapancasara, Mantrarnava, and others ordinarily met with.
The difference between the Pancaratra and S'aivagamas lies in the Pancaratras treating more of those things that would lead to Brahmajnana; and are therefore more transcendental than the S'aivagamas. A similar remark applies when we speak of the relative merits of S'aivagamas and S'aktagamas. The latter treat of indecent subjects devoting some of the Samhitas to Daksinacara, and some to Vamacara. Several matters, are, however, common to all the three Agamas, viz., a devotion to the subject of mantras in general, including the general principles which regulate a mantra, and the Siddhi or acquirement of certain occult powers through a contemplation of mantras and their symbols.
The subject of mantras, however, is introduced to help their practice, and in order that the worship of the idols specified therein may be performed more efficiently. In the S'aivagamas, again, several of the more obscure and little known subjects, are treated of; such as the occult sciences of breath, omens, astrology, and other topics. Another subject common to all these Tantras is the incapacity of people to practise the methods of Brahma-vidya as [Page 60] described in the Upanisads; and an attempt to substitute easier methods of worship. Regarding the worship proper, each of them specifies its own objects, although there is not much difference in either their rationale, or the object with which the idols are worshipped.
Having therefore explained the nature of these writings, we shall now speak of their teachings.
To take up the Pancaratra agamas first, Jnana is essential to attain moksa. For that purpose, Narayana is described as indescribable in the same strain as Advaitic works.
The first manifestation of Narayana is Vasudeva with an the emblems of Visnu: he is said to be located in the heart in the microcosm. He is the object of worship and the goal to be reached. Vasudeva divides himself into two, Narayana and Vasudeva, the former being of a blue colour, the latter being white. From Vasudeva there sprang up another manifestation called Samkarsana. From him comes Aniruddha and from Aniruddha we have Pradyumna. These three represent one of the three attributes, viz, Jnana, Bala, Ais'varya of Vasudeva, predominating in them. Twenty four devas come into existence, six belonging to each of these manifestations and having one of [Page 61] the six attributes of Narayana, viz., Jnana, Bala, Ais'varya, VTrya, Tejas and S'akti.
These Devas are as follow:
Vasudeva,
Kes'ava,
Narayana,
Madhava,
Purusottama and Janardana;
Samkarsana,
Govinda,
Visnu,
Madhusudana,
Adhoksaja, and Upendra;
Aniruddha,
Trivikrama,
Vamana,
S'rTdhara,
Narasimha, and Hari;
Pradyumna,
HrsTkes'a,
Padmanabha,
Damodara,
Acyuta and Krsna.
From these four original manifestations eight murtis, viz., BrahmT, Prajapatya; VaisnavT, Divija; ArsT, ManusT, AsurT, Pais'acT and also the ten incarnations of Visnu spring up. When all these manifestations took place, the various emblems of Visnu, such as Ananta, the discus, the conch, etc., corresponding to the eight Murtis, and the eight Prakrtis have also sprung up; and also Garuda. These four manifestations seem to correspond to the Vedantic ideas of Hiranyagarbha, Sutratman, Prajna, and Viraj. Brahma is then created by Aniruddha, and he in his turn created the world in the same way as is described in the Puranas, with no difference except that from Aniruddha, Maya sprang up and enveloped
everybody in the universe. The laws of Karma are explained as the reason for people suffering for the wrongs they do. The escape from this lies in Jnana which is [Page 62) either Sattrunstta (?) Jnana of knowledge that “I am Brahman”; or Kriya Jnana (knowledge by work) or Yoga as explained in the writings on the subject; an alternative is allowed, namely, of concentrating one's mind on an image or idol ( Praticchaya) of Brahman. In this and a similar manner the Jnana-pada finishes and a third method, viz.; the practice of Abhyasa Yoga is described in the Yoga-pada. He who is unable to perform any of these methods, but is at the same time anxious to obtain moksa, is enjoined in the Kriya-pada to have plenty of wealth and to dedicate a temple to worship Narayana in the manner therein described.
A similar worship is also enjoined for S'iva in the S'aivagamas. The subject is introduced in the same way as in the Pancaratra agamas. Here S'iva is considered as a manifestation of the Brahman who is also some-times called Sadas'iva. He is said to have five aspects ( mukha ) viz, Ts'ana, Sadyojata; Vamana; Aghora and Tatpurusa. As every one of these contains three eyes; it follows that he has fifteen, eyes when he appears at one and the same time in all his aspects. Then the Ts'ana is his head, the Tatpurusa his mouth, Aghora his heart, Vamana his secret part, and [Page 63] Sadyojata his feet. This body he is said to have assumed simply to enable the devotee to worship him. He is
also called Pas'upati, lord of jTvas ( pas'u) ; who are entirely dependent on him. Pas'upati informs his consort ParvatT that as it is impossible to practise, Brahma-vidya, he will teach Yoga for the good of mankind. Different kinds of Yoga are taught and S'aivagamas contain more information about Yoga than the Pancaratra-agamas. He again says, that in the Kali Yuga, it is not possible to practise Yoga, and therefore recommends his worship in some form or other. These subjects are taught in the Jnana and Yoga-padas of these agamas. Then comes Kriya-pada, in which he says that his worship in the form of linga (phallus) is preferable; if for such a worship a temple is built. If he cannot do even that, he is enjoined to worship a linga, which may be carried along by a devotee. This is Caryapada in which any other subjects such as Rudraksa which is recommended to be worn by the devotee, the secret of mantras, and the occult properties of herbs, etc., are also taught.
The S'aktagamas have a similar tale to tell. Prakrti or S'akti is said to be the primal force in the cosmos. She is defined to be of eternal [Page 64] existence and independent of Brahman and the plastic origin of all things. A detailed description follows in which the origin of all kinds of sentient beings including the devas is traced to her, and she is said to be eight-fold, (VarahT, CamundT, etc.). S'iva explains that by the power of Yoga, he divided himself, in the net of creation, into two. The right half was male (Ts'vara) and the left was female (NarT), and the whole was hence called ArdhanarTs'vara. The three female divinities LaksmT, SarasvatT and ParvatT are considered her manifestations. The rest of the Jnana, Yoga, and Kriyapadas are treated in the same manner as those of Pancaratra and S'aiva agamas, worship of S'akti being only instituted; it is said, as a substitute in this Yuga, for the higher mode of worship.
With regard to construction of temples, there is very little difference between them. Temples according to these Agamas are of four forms, circular, quadrilateral, oblongular, and elliptical. The last is very rarely to be met with now-a-days. The outer walls may be either one, three, five or seven with entrance gates. There may be one, two or four towers for the outermost wall. The towers may have any number of stories up to twelve. The temple should be in [Page 65] the centre of the village, and directions are given to find out which is the centre of the village.
That point is taken as the centre point of the temple intended to be constructed, and further directions are given as to the size of the temple according to the space available. A large number of temples constructed now-a-days do not at all conform to these instructions, and we thus see them sometimes at the end of the village. [ S'iva being a non-quiescent deity (Kruradevata) temples dedicated to him should be built outside or at the end of a village, if possible and so also for S'akti. The reason is said to be that if these are not properly worshipped, the force latent in them, will at once cast its influence around, and not only will the temple become useless as a centre of that force, but even harm will be done to the villagers ]
Such has been a brief out-line of the teachings of the Tantras. They have been most severely criticized by Badarayana in his Brahma-Sutras (2nd Adhyaya, second pada) and condemned by S'amkaracarya. But the Pancaratra agamas have been upheld by Ramanujacarya, on the ground that although there are some theories in those Agamas antagonistic to the teachings of the Upanisads, those parts of the former that are not antagonistic to the latter might be considered authoritative. Nilakantha in his S'aivabhasya is reprehensible;
he takes up the [Page 66] Sutra condemning the S'aivagamas, fills in certain words which he thinks are understood and twists the whole Sutra to mean “The worship of Pasupati is upheld”. Such has been the relation of Vedanta to the teachings of the Agamas, and as Hinduism is degenerating, their teachings and more especially the baser part of them, are gaining over the minds of the fallen Hindus. Yet we should be only too glad to find that Idol-worship, the least harmless of those teachings is still dragging on its existence; and in these days a correct understanding of the mode of worship will no doubt help us in our onward progress, for there lies the key to our development in occultism: and the exotericism of idol-worship, will I hope one day form the subject of my paper on the next occasion we may meet in this Hall to celebrate another epoch in the history of the Theosophical Society, had it not been for the work of which we would not all join our hands so gladly.
The practice of mantras is a form of Yoga, the other kinds of Yoga being Raja, Laya, and Hatha; these practices are taken up by persons who have no command over their own will. With a dangerous weapon as Mantra Siddhi in their hands they can do any amount of harm to mankind, and if a man becomes so depraved [Page 67] in morals, he is in no way better than the Atlantean of old. It is the duty of every true Hindu not to meddle himself with these writings, if he finds he will soon become allured by their teachings; but if anyone does take them up, let me, for one, be allowed to recommend the best of them — idol-worship — as a means to the Higher Science, and let me warn, one and all who have seriously made up their minds to study these writings in the light of the words of Krsna: “He who worships them (the minor deities) goes to them, he who worships me attains me”.