Difference between revisions of "Taixu"
(Created page with "{{GenerateImages|6}} <poem> Taixu ({{Wiki|traditional Chinese}}: 太虛; simplified {{Wiki|Chinese}}: 太虚; pinyin: Tàixū; Wade–Giles : T'ai Hsü), 1890-1947, w...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GenerateImages|6}} | {{GenerateImages|6}} | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
− | [[Taixu]] ({{Wiki|traditional Chinese}}: [[太虛]]; simplified {{Wiki|Chinese}}: 太虚; pinyin: Tàixū; Wade–Giles : T'ai Hsü), 1890-1947, was a [[Buddhist]] modernist, activist and thinker who advocated the reform and renewal of [[Chinese Buddhism]]. | + | [[Taixu]] ({{Wiki|traditional Chinese}}: [[太虛]]; simplified {{Wiki|Chinese}}: 太虚; pinyin: Tàixū; Wade–Giles : [[T'ai Hsü]]), 1890-1947, was a [[Buddhist]] modernist, activist and thinker who advocated the reform and renewal of [[Chinese Buddhism]]. |
{{Wiki|Biography}} | {{Wiki|Biography}} | ||
− | [[Taixu]] was born in Hǎiníng (海寧/海宁) in {{Wiki|Zhejiang}} province. His lay [[name]] was Lǚ Pèilín (呂沛林). His [[parents]] [[died]] when he was still young, and he was raised by his grandparents. At 16 he was [[ordained]] into the [[Linji school]] of [[Chan Buddhism]] in Xiao Jiǔhuá [[Temple]] (小九華寺/小九华寺) in Suzhou. Not long after being [[ordained]] he was given the [[Dharma name]] of [[Taixu]], meaning Great [[Emptiness]]. In 1909 he travelled to [[Nanjing]] to join the [[Sutra]] Carving {{Wiki|Society}} established there by the lay [[Buddhist]] Yang Renshan. | + | [[Taixu]] was born in Hǎiníng (海寧/海宁) in {{Wiki|Zhejiang}} province. His lay [[name]] was Lǚ Pèilín (呂沛林). His [[parents]] [[died]] when he was still young, and he was raised by his grandparents. At 16 he was [[ordained]] into the [[Linji school]] of [[Chan Buddhism]] in [[Xiao]] Jiǔhuá [[Temple]] (小九華寺/小九华寺) in [[Suzhou]]. Not long after being [[ordained]] he was given the [[Dharma name]] of [[Taixu]], meaning Great [[Emptiness]]. In 1909 he travelled to [[Nanjing]] to join the [[Sutra]] Carving {{Wiki|Society}} established there by the lay [[Buddhist]] [[Yang]] Renshan. |
− | As a result of being exposed to the {{Wiki|political}} writings of [[Kang]] Youwei, {{Wiki|Liang Qichao}}, Tan Sitong and Zhang Taiyan, [[Taixu]] turned his [[mind]] to the reformation of [[Buddhism]]. In 1911 while in Guangzhou, he made [[contact]] with the revolutionaries plotting to overthrow the {{Wiki|Qing dynasty}} and participated in some secret {{Wiki|revolutionary}} [[activities]]. [[Taixu]] would later describe the formation of his {{Wiki|political}} [[thinking]] during this [[time]] in his Autobiography (自傳 zìzhuàn): | + | As a result of being exposed to the {{Wiki|political}} writings of [[Kang]] Youwei, {{Wiki|Liang Qichao}}, Tan Sitong and Zhang Taiyan, [[Taixu]] turned his [[mind]] to the reformation of [[Buddhism]]. In 1911 while in [[Guangzhou]], he made [[contact]] with the revolutionaries plotting to overthrow the {{Wiki|Qing dynasty}} and participated in some secret {{Wiki|revolutionary}} [[activities]]. [[Taixu]] would later describe the formation of his {{Wiki|political}} [[thinking]] during this [[time]] in his Autobiography (自傳 zìzhuàn): |
My {{Wiki|social}} and {{Wiki|political}} [[thought]] was based upon 'Mr. {{Wiki|Constitution}}', the Republican {{Wiki|Revolution}}, Socialism, and Anarchism. As I read works such as Zhang Taiyan's "On Establishing [[Religion]]", "On the Five Negatives", and "On [[Evolution]]", I came to see Anarchism and [[Buddhism]] as close companions, and as a possible advancement from Democratic Socialism. | My {{Wiki|social}} and {{Wiki|political}} [[thought]] was based upon 'Mr. {{Wiki|Constitution}}', the Republican {{Wiki|Revolution}}, Socialism, and Anarchism. As I read works such as Zhang Taiyan's "On Establishing [[Religion]]", "On the Five Negatives", and "On [[Evolution]]", I came to see Anarchism and [[Buddhism]] as close companions, and as a possible advancement from Democratic Socialism. | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
After the establishment of the new {{Wiki|Republic}} of [[China]], [[Taixu]] founded the Association for the Advancement of [[Buddhism]] (佛教協進會/佛教协进会 [[fójiào]] xiéjìn hùi), which lasted only a short [[time]] due to resistance from conservative [[Buddhists]]. Unable to convince the [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|community}} of his [[ideas]], and shocked by the outbreak of the {{Wiki|First World War}} and the [[sufferings]] in [[China]], [[Taixu]] went into {{Wiki|seclusion}} (閉關/闭关 bìguān) on [[Putuoshan]] for three years from October 1914. | After the establishment of the new {{Wiki|Republic}} of [[China]], [[Taixu]] founded the Association for the Advancement of [[Buddhism]] (佛教協進會/佛教协进会 [[fójiào]] xiéjìn hùi), which lasted only a short [[time]] due to resistance from conservative [[Buddhists]]. Unable to convince the [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|community}} of his [[ideas]], and shocked by the outbreak of the {{Wiki|First World War}} and the [[sufferings]] in [[China]], [[Taixu]] went into {{Wiki|seclusion}} (閉關/闭关 bìguān) on [[Putuoshan]] for three years from October 1914. | ||
− | Until his [[death]] [[Taixu]] worked toward the revival of [[Buddhism in China]], although because of the economic and {{Wiki|political}} turmoil that [[China]] [[experienced]] through wars and revolutions, few of his projects were successful. He [[died]] on March 12, 1947 at the Jade [[Buddha]] [[Temple]] (玉佛寺 yùfó sì) in {{Wiki|Shanghai}}. One of his influential [[disciples]] was Dongchu 東初 (1907–1977). | + | Until his [[death]] [[Taixu]] worked toward the revival of [[Buddhism in China]], although because of the economic and {{Wiki|political}} turmoil that [[China]] [[experienced]] through [[wars]] and revolutions, few of his projects were successful. He [[died]] on March 12, 1947 at the [[Jade]] [[Buddha]] [[Temple]] (玉佛寺 yùfó sì) in {{Wiki|Shanghai}}. One of his influential [[disciples]] was [[Dongchu]] 東初 (1907–1977). |
[[Buddhist Modernism]] | [[Buddhist Modernism]] | ||
Main articles: [[Humanistic Buddhism]] and [[Buddhist modernism]] | Main articles: [[Humanistic Buddhism]] and [[Buddhist modernism]] | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
This reorganization of the [[Sangha]] was an attempt to revitalize [[Buddhism]], an important step to bring about a [[Pure Land]] in this [[world]]. [[Pure Land Buddhism]] was widely practiced in [[China]] during his [[time]]. Taixu's modernist [[mentality]] [[caused]] him to propagate the [[idea]] of a [[Pure Land]], not as a land of [[Buddhist cosmology]] but as something possible to create here and now in this very [[world]]. Pittman writes: | This reorganization of the [[Sangha]] was an attempt to revitalize [[Buddhism]], an important step to bring about a [[Pure Land]] in this [[world]]. [[Pure Land Buddhism]] was widely practiced in [[China]] during his [[time]]. Taixu's modernist [[mentality]] [[caused]] him to propagate the [[idea]] of a [[Pure Land]], not as a land of [[Buddhist cosmology]] but as something possible to create here and now in this very [[world]]. Pittman writes: | ||
− | His [[views]] on the [[realization]] of that {{Wiki|ideal}} were far from those of the mainstream of the contemporary [[Sangha]]. Rather than focusing on the glories of distant [[pure lands]], which were accessible through reliance on the [[spiritual]] [[merit]] and power of other [[great bodhisattvas]] and [[buddhas]], [[Taixu]] [[visualized]] this [[earthly]] [[world]] [[transformed]] into a [[pure land]] by the [[dedication]] and sacrificial hard work of thousands of average [[bodhisattvas]] who were [[mindful]] of what their concerted {{Wiki|witness}} could mean. | + | His [[views]] on the [[realization]] of that {{Wiki|ideal}} were far from those of the {{Wiki|mainstream}} of the contemporary [[Sangha]]. Rather than focusing on the glories of distant [[pure lands]], which were accessible through reliance on the [[spiritual]] [[merit]] and power of other [[great bodhisattvas]] and [[buddhas]], [[Taixu]] [[visualized]] this [[earthly]] [[world]] [[transformed]] into a [[pure land]] by the [[dedication]] and sacrificial hard work of thousands of average [[bodhisattvas]] who were [[mindful]] of what their concerted {{Wiki|witness}} could mean. |
− | Like many [[Buddhist]] modernists, [[Taixu]] was [[interested]] in using tactics such as {{Wiki|cultural}} translation (a method of explaining [[Buddhism]]) so that non [[Buddhists]] can better comprehend the complexity of the [[tradition]]. For example, in his essay "[[Science]] and [[Buddhism]]," [[Taixu]] makes a translation of the [[Buddha's teaching]] that inside of every drop of [[water]], there are 84 thousand microbes, a [[Buddhist teaching]] that basically states that within our [[world]] there are many more [[worlds]]. He goes on to explain how that when one looks inside of a microscope one will be able to see these tiny microbes and that each one is a [[life]] of its own. | + | Like many [[Buddhist]] modernists, [[Taixu]] was [[interested]] in using tactics such as {{Wiki|cultural}} translation (a method of explaining [[Buddhism]]) so that non [[Buddhists]] can better comprehend the complexity of the [[tradition]]. For example, in his essay "[[Science]] and [[Buddhism]]," [[Taixu]] makes a translation of the [[Buddha's teaching]] that inside of every drop of [[water]], there are 84 thousand microbes, a [[Buddhist teaching]] that basically states that within our [[world]] there are many more [[worlds]]. He goes on to explain how that when one looks inside of a microscope one will be able to see these tiny microbes and that each one is a [[life]] of its [[own]]. |
− | In his writings he connected the [[scientific]] {{Wiki|theory}} that there is [[infinite space]] with no center of the [[universe]] to the [[Buddhist Sutras]] that states "[[Space]] is [[endless]] and the number of [[worlds]] is [[infinite]], for all are in mutual counterpoise like a network of innumerable beads." However, [[Taixu]] did not believe that [[science]] was the be-all and end-all. As a matter of fact he saw that in no way was it possible to reach [[enlightenment]] through [[science]] even though it is capable of explaining many of the universe's mysteries. "[[Scientific]] [[knowledge]] can prove and postulate the [[Buddhist doctrine]], but it cannot ascertain the [[realities]] of the [[Buddhist doctrine]]." He understood [[Buddhism]] to be [[scientific]] and yet surpassing [[science]]. Like other [[Buddhist]] modernists, [[Taixu]] condemned {{Wiki|superstition}}. [[Taixu]] explains that the two deeply rooted {{Wiki|superstitions}} were the "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[God]]" and the "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]." These two {{Wiki|superstitions}} go hand-in-hand in regards to explaining why, according to [[Taixu]], [[Buddhism]] is the only way to true [[enlightenment]]. The "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[God]]" can be understand as how [[science]] will never be able to explain the [[existence]] of the [[supernatural]]. Also [[science]] is also only able to explain the {{Wiki|materialistic}} aspects of the [[world]], which leads to the second {{Wiki|superstition}}, "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]." The "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]" is basically {{Wiki|materialism}} but as {{Wiki|materialism}}, in this [[sense]], means what [[science]] is capable of explaining. These two {{Wiki|superstitions}} [[essentially]] blind [[science]] and people's ability to see the [[truths]] that only [[Buddhism]] can reveal. | + | In his writings he connected the [[scientific]] {{Wiki|theory}} that there is [[infinite space]] with no center of the [[universe]] to the [[Buddhist Sutras]] that states "[[Space]] is [[endless]] and the number of [[worlds]] is [[infinite]], for all are in mutual counterpoise like a network of {{Wiki|innumerable}} [[beads]]." However, [[Taixu]] did not believe that [[science]] was the be-all and end-all. As a {{Wiki|matter}} of fact he saw that in no way was it possible to reach [[enlightenment]] through [[science]] even though it is capable of explaining many of the universe's {{Wiki|mysteries}}. "[[Scientific]] [[knowledge]] can prove and postulate the [[Buddhist doctrine]], but it cannot ascertain the [[realities]] of the [[Buddhist doctrine]]." He understood [[Buddhism]] to be [[scientific]] and yet surpassing [[science]]. Like other [[Buddhist]] modernists, [[Taixu]] condemned {{Wiki|superstition}}. [[Taixu]] explains that the two deeply rooted {{Wiki|superstitions}} were the "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[God]]" and the "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]." These two {{Wiki|superstitions}} go hand-in-hand in regards to explaining why, according to [[Taixu]], [[Buddhism]] is the only way to true [[enlightenment]]. The "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[God]]" can be understand as how [[science]] will never be able to explain the [[existence]] of the [[supernatural]]. Also [[science]] is also only able to explain the {{Wiki|materialistic}} aspects of the [[world]], which leads to the second {{Wiki|superstition}}, "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]." The "{{Wiki|Superstition}} of [[Reality]]" is basically {{Wiki|materialism}} but as {{Wiki|materialism}}, in this [[sense]], means what [[science]] is capable of explaining. These two {{Wiki|superstitions}} [[essentially]] [[blind]] [[science]] and people's ability to see the [[truths]] that only [[Buddhism]] can reveal. |
Survey of Writings | Survey of Writings | ||
− | In one publication by [[Taixu]], he discusses the importance of interreligious dialogue. He realizes the problems that [[exist]] in [[China]] and through a [[conversation]] with a {{Wiki|French}} archbishop he was able to understand this importance. [[Taixu]] writes: | + | In one publication by [[Taixu]], he discusses the importance of interreligious {{Wiki|dialogue}}. He realizes the problems that [[exist]] in [[China]] and through a [[conversation]] with a {{Wiki|French}} [[archbishop]] he was able to understand this importance. [[Taixu]] writes: |
All [[religions]] should be regulated in order that they conform to the situation in [[China]]. There should be no overt rejection of {{Wiki|Catholicism}}. | All [[religions]] should be regulated in order that they conform to the situation in [[China]]. There should be no overt rejection of {{Wiki|Catholicism}}. | ||
− | This quote shows that [[Taixu]] believed there was no [[reason]] to deny the teachings of another [[religion]] because different [[religions]], with cooperation and open-mindedness, have the ability to work together and learn from each other. [[Taixu]] went as far as incorporating some {{Wiki|Christian}} [[ideas]], such as methods of pastoral training and revival style preaching, into his own [[Buddhist practices]]. | + | This quote shows that [[Taixu]] believed there was no [[reason]] to deny the teachings of another [[religion]] because different [[religions]], with cooperation and open-mindedness, have the ability to work together and learn from each other. [[Taixu]] went as far as incorporating some {{Wiki|Christian}} [[ideas]], such as [[methods]] of [[pastoral]] {{Wiki|training}} and revival style preaching, into his [[own]] [[Buddhist practices]]. |
− | [[Beyond]] adopting select [[Christians]] methods, a more controversial topic that [[Taixu]] dealt with openly was the [[existence]] of [[God]]. When [[Taixu]] went into three years of [[self]] confinement after a failed reform attempt he reflected on the [[subject]] - | + | [[Beyond]] adopting select [[Christians]] [[methods]], a more controversial topic that [[Taixu]] dealt with openly was the [[existence]] of [[God]]. When [[Taixu]] went into three years of [[self]] confinement after a failed reform attempt he reflected on the [[subject]] - |
− | Who is [[God]]? Is He made of matter or not? . . . If He [[exists]] in the [[heart]] only, then his [[existence]] is legendary, similar to such {{Wiki|non-existent}} things as "[[turtle]] [[hair]]" and "{{Wiki|hare}} horn." Thus, we should not believe that [[God]] created all things in the [[world]]. . . . How did He create the [[Universe]]? If the {{Wiki|Holy}} Father is part of the [[universe]], it is unreasonable that He created the [[world]]. I challenge the [[existence]] of [[God]]. Show me the {{Wiki|evidence}} of the [[birth]] of [[God]]. What was He before His [[birth]]? Does He [[exist]] because He possesses an inherent [[nature]]? It is not [[rational]] to claim that all things [[exist]] before His [[birth]]. If there is a [[birth]], or a beginning, there should be an end. It is unreasonable to say that He is almighty. . . . If, with [[knowledge]], [[God]] created man and all things at His will, then did He create man blindly or ignorantly? How could He create sinful things, crimes, [[ignorance]], and even blasphemers? This would be unreasonable. If He did all these things, it would be unreasonable that [[God]] sent [[people]] into exile, to make them [[suffer]], rather than allowing them to stay in [[Paradise]]. How could [[God]] create men who do not [[respect]] Him? | + | Who is [[God]]? Is He made of {{Wiki|matter}} or not? . . . If He [[exists]] in the [[heart]] only, then his [[existence]] is legendary, similar to such {{Wiki|non-existent}} things as "[[turtle]] [[hair]]" and "{{Wiki|hare}} horn." Thus, we should not believe that [[God]] created all things in the [[world]]. . . . How did He create the [[Universe]]? If the {{Wiki|Holy}} Father is part of the [[universe]], it is unreasonable that He created the [[world]]. I challenge the [[existence]] of [[God]]. Show me the {{Wiki|evidence}} of the [[birth]] of [[God]]. What was He before His [[birth]]? Does He [[exist]] because He possesses an [[inherent]] [[nature]]? It is not [[rational]] to claim that all things [[exist]] before His [[birth]]. If there is a [[birth]], or a beginning, there should be an end. It is unreasonable to say that He is almighty. . . . If, with [[knowledge]], [[God]] created man and all things at His will, then did He create man blindly or ignorantly? How could He create sinful things, crimes, [[ignorance]], and even blasphemers? This would be unreasonable. If He did all these things, it would be unreasonable that [[God]] sent [[people]] into exile, to make them [[suffer]], rather than allowing them to stay in [[Paradise]]. How could [[God]] create men who do not [[respect]] Him? |
− | [[Taixu]] questions the [[existence]] of [[God]] because rationally if one looks at the world's situation there is no {{Wiki|evidence}} of a [[god]]. He appears to tie this argument to the connections between [[Buddhism]] and [[science]], and how {{Wiki|superstition}} creates an obstacle on the [[path]] to [[enlightenment]]. | + | [[Taixu]] questions the [[existence]] of [[God]] because {{Wiki|rationally}} if one looks at the world's situation there is no {{Wiki|evidence}} of a [[god]]. He appears to tie this argument to the connections between [[Buddhism]] and [[science]], and how {{Wiki|superstition}} creates an [[obstacle]] on the [[path]] to [[enlightenment]]. |
− | In Taixu’s own article “[[Science]] and [[Buddhism]]” he offers many [[interesting]] and original [[thoughts]] on [[science]] and {{Wiki|superstition}}. Taixu’s main argument in the article is that all of the {{Wiki|superstition}} in the [[world]] such as “The {{Wiki|superstition}} of [[God]] or the restriction of the [[ego]]” and “the {{Wiki|superstition}} of [[reality]]” prevent the advance of [[scientific]] discovery because of the closed-mindedness of the superstitious [[people]] to see [[beyond]] their [[beliefs]]. [[Taixu]] writes, | + | In Taixu’s [[own]] article “[[Science]] and [[Buddhism]]” he offers many [[interesting]] and original [[thoughts]] on [[science]] and {{Wiki|superstition}}. Taixu’s main argument in the article is that all of the {{Wiki|superstition}} in the [[world]] such as “The {{Wiki|superstition}} of [[God]] or the restriction of the [[ego]]” and “the {{Wiki|superstition}} of [[reality]]” prevent the advance of [[scientific]] discovery because of the closed-mindedness of the {{Wiki|superstitious}} [[people]] to see [[beyond]] their [[beliefs]]. [[Taixu]] writes, |
− | [[Science]] therefore, can never be the main support of [[Buddhism]] although it may act as a valuable auxiliary and much may be expected from uniting the two methods of [[investigation]]. | + | [[Science]] therefore, can never be the main support of [[Buddhism]] although it may act as a valuable auxiliary and much may be expected from uniting the two [[methods]] of [[investigation]]. |
− | From his writings Taixu’s followers can [[grasp]] an [[understanding]] that he believes [[science]] is a valuable resource but because of people's steadfast [[faith]] in {{Wiki|superstitions}} it will never be a successful asset to [[Buddhism]]. He seems to argue that [[science]] is a means to [[enlightenment]] but it will never allow someone to get there. In Taixu's words, "[[Scientific]] methods can only corroborate the [[Buddhist doctrine]], they can never advance [[beyond]] it." | + | From his writings Taixu’s followers can [[grasp]] an [[understanding]] that he believes [[science]] is a valuable resource but because of people's steadfast [[faith]] in {{Wiki|superstitions}} it will never be a successful asset to [[Buddhism]]. He seems to argue that [[science]] is a means to [[enlightenment]] but it will never allow someone to get there. In Taixu's words, "[[Scientific]] [[methods]] can only corroborate the [[Buddhist doctrine]], they can never advance [[beyond]] it." |
Don Pittman wrote a [[book]] entitled “Toward a {{Wiki|Modern}} [[Chinese Buddhism]]” in which he analyzes Taixu’s reform efforts. One of his reform efforts was the attempt to make [[Pure Land Buddhism]] a [[reality]]. | Don Pittman wrote a [[book]] entitled “Toward a {{Wiki|Modern}} [[Chinese Buddhism]]” in which he analyzes Taixu’s reform efforts. One of his reform efforts was the attempt to make [[Pure Land Buddhism]] a [[reality]]. | ||
− | If today, based on good [[knowledge]] of our [[minds]], we can produce [[pure]] [[thoughts]] and work hard to accomplish [[good deeds]]. How hard can it be to [[transform]] an impure [[China]] into a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[pure land]]?... All persons have this force of [[mind]], and since they already have the faculty (benneng) to create a [[pure land]], they can all make the glorious [[vow]] to make this [[world]] into a [[pure land]] and work hard to achieve it." | + | If today, based on good [[knowledge]] of our [[minds]], we can produce [[pure]] [[thoughts]] and work hard to accomplish [[good deeds]]. How hard can it be to [[transform]] an impure [[China]] into a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[pure land]]?... All persons have this force of [[mind]], and since they already have the {{Wiki|faculty}} (benneng) to create a [[pure land]], they can all make the glorious [[vow]] to make this [[world]] into a [[pure land]] and work hard to achieve it." |
− | This among many things was one of Taixu's greatest [[ideas]] of reform. He believed that the only way to end the [[suffering]] on this [[world]] was to bring the [[Pure Land]] to it. He attempted to do so through many means, including the reorganization of the [[Sangha]]. Unfortunately for [[Taixu]], his attempts at global {{Wiki|propagating}} the [[Dharma]] failed. Most of his {{Wiki|institutions}} that were set up to help bring about this better [[life]] were crushed by many different things, including the [[Wikipedia:Communism|communists]]. | + | This among many things was one of Taixu's greatest [[ideas]] of reform. He believed that the only way to end the [[suffering]] on this [[world]] was to bring the [[Pure Land]] to it. He attempted to do so through many means, [[including]] the reorganization of the [[Sangha]]. Unfortunately for [[Taixu]], his attempts at global {{Wiki|propagating}} the [[Dharma]] failed. Most of his {{Wiki|institutions}} that were set up to help bring about this better [[life]] were crushed by many different things, [[including]] the [[Wikipedia:Communism|communists]]. |
</poem> | </poem> | ||
{{W}} | {{W}} | ||
[[Category:Chinese Buddhism]] | [[Category:Chinese Buddhism]] | ||
[[Category:Buddhism And Science]] | [[Category:Buddhism And Science]] |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 30 November 2023
Taixu (traditional Chinese: 太虛; simplified Chinese: 太虚; pinyin: Tàixū; Wade–Giles : T'ai Hsü), 1890-1947, was a Buddhist modernist, activist and thinker who advocated the reform and renewal of Chinese Buddhism.
Biography
Taixu was born in Hǎiníng (海寧/海宁) in Zhejiang province. His lay name was Lǚ Pèilín (呂沛林). His parents died when he was still young, and he was raised by his grandparents. At 16 he was ordained into the Linji school of Chan Buddhism in Xiao Jiǔhuá Temple (小九華寺/小九华寺) in Suzhou. Not long after being ordained he was given the Dharma name of Taixu, meaning Great Emptiness. In 1909 he travelled to Nanjing to join the Sutra Carving Society established there by the lay Buddhist Yang Renshan.
As a result of being exposed to the political writings of Kang Youwei, Liang Qichao, Tan Sitong and Zhang Taiyan, Taixu turned his mind to the reformation of Buddhism. In 1911 while in Guangzhou, he made contact with the revolutionaries plotting to overthrow the Qing dynasty and participated in some secret revolutionary activities. Taixu would later describe the formation of his political thinking during this time in his Autobiography (自傳 zìzhuàn):
My social and political thought was based upon 'Mr. Constitution', the Republican Revolution, Socialism, and Anarchism. As I read works such as Zhang Taiyan's "On Establishing Religion", "On the Five Negatives", and "On Evolution", I came to see Anarchism and Buddhism as close companions, and as a possible advancement from Democratic Socialism.
After the establishment of the new Republic of China, Taixu founded the Association for the Advancement of Buddhism (佛教協進會/佛教协进会 fójiào xiéjìn hùi), which lasted only a short time due to resistance from conservative Buddhists. Unable to convince the Buddhist community of his ideas, and shocked by the outbreak of the First World War and the sufferings in China, Taixu went into seclusion (閉關/闭关 bìguān) on Putuoshan for three years from October 1914.
Until his death Taixu worked toward the revival of Buddhism in China, although because of the economic and political turmoil that China experienced through wars and revolutions, few of his projects were successful. He died on March 12, 1947 at the Jade Buddha Temple (玉佛寺 yùfó sì) in Shanghai. One of his influential disciples was Dongchu 東初 (1907–1977).
Buddhist Modernism
Main articles: Humanistic Buddhism and Buddhist modernism
Besides being a revolutionary activist for the Chinese, Taixu was a Buddhist modernist. He took the doctrine and adapted it so that he may propagate Buddhism throughout the world. One of his grand schemes was to reorganize the Sangha. He envisioned plan was to cut the number of monks in the monastic order down and according to history of religion professor Don A. Pittman, by 1930 Taixu had
these numbers [down] to include only twenty thousand monastics; five thousand students, twelve thousand bodhisattva monastics, and three thousand elders. Of the twelve thousand bodhisattva monastics, five thousand should be spreading the Dharma through public preaching and teaching, three thousand serving as administrators in Buddhist educational institutions, fifteen hundred engaging in Buddhist charitable and relief work, fifteen hundred serving as instructors in the monastic educational system, and one thousand participating in various cultural affairs.
This reorganization of the Sangha was an attempt to revitalize Buddhism, an important step to bring about a Pure Land in this world. Pure Land Buddhism was widely practiced in China during his time. Taixu's modernist mentality caused him to propagate the idea of a Pure Land, not as a land of Buddhist cosmology but as something possible to create here and now in this very world. Pittman writes:
His views on the realization of that ideal were far from those of the mainstream of the contemporary Sangha. Rather than focusing on the glories of distant pure lands, which were accessible through reliance on the spiritual merit and power of other great bodhisattvas and buddhas, Taixu visualized this earthly world transformed into a pure land by the dedication and sacrificial hard work of thousands of average bodhisattvas who were mindful of what their concerted witness could mean.
Like many Buddhist modernists, Taixu was interested in using tactics such as cultural translation (a method of explaining Buddhism) so that non Buddhists can better comprehend the complexity of the tradition. For example, in his essay "Science and Buddhism," Taixu makes a translation of the Buddha's teaching that inside of every drop of water, there are 84 thousand microbes, a Buddhist teaching that basically states that within our world there are many more worlds. He goes on to explain how that when one looks inside of a microscope one will be able to see these tiny microbes and that each one is a life of its own.
In his writings he connected the scientific theory that there is infinite space with no center of the universe to the Buddhist Sutras that states "Space is endless and the number of worlds is infinite, for all are in mutual counterpoise like a network of innumerable beads." However, Taixu did not believe that science was the be-all and end-all. As a matter of fact he saw that in no way was it possible to reach enlightenment through science even though it is capable of explaining many of the universe's mysteries. "Scientific knowledge can prove and postulate the Buddhist doctrine, but it cannot ascertain the realities of the Buddhist doctrine." He understood Buddhism to be scientific and yet surpassing science. Like other Buddhist modernists, Taixu condemned superstition. Taixu explains that the two deeply rooted superstitions were the "Superstition of God" and the "Superstition of Reality." These two superstitions go hand-in-hand in regards to explaining why, according to Taixu, Buddhism is the only way to true enlightenment. The "Superstition of God" can be understand as how science will never be able to explain the existence of the supernatural. Also science is also only able to explain the materialistic aspects of the world, which leads to the second superstition, "Superstition of Reality." The "Superstition of Reality" is basically materialism but as materialism, in this sense, means what science is capable of explaining. These two superstitions essentially blind science and people's ability to see the truths that only Buddhism can reveal.
Survey of Writings
In one publication by Taixu, he discusses the importance of interreligious dialogue. He realizes the problems that exist in China and through a conversation with a French archbishop he was able to understand this importance. Taixu writes:
All religions should be regulated in order that they conform to the situation in China. There should be no overt rejection of Catholicism.
This quote shows that Taixu believed there was no reason to deny the teachings of another religion because different religions, with cooperation and open-mindedness, have the ability to work together and learn from each other. Taixu went as far as incorporating some Christian ideas, such as methods of pastoral training and revival style preaching, into his own Buddhist practices.
Beyond adopting select Christians methods, a more controversial topic that Taixu dealt with openly was the existence of God. When Taixu went into three years of self confinement after a failed reform attempt he reflected on the subject -
Who is God? Is He made of matter or not? . . . If He exists in the heart only, then his existence is legendary, similar to such non-existent things as "turtle hair" and "hare horn." Thus, we should not believe that God created all things in the world. . . . How did He create the Universe? If the Holy Father is part of the universe, it is unreasonable that He created the world. I challenge the existence of God. Show me the evidence of the birth of God. What was He before His birth? Does He exist because He possesses an inherent nature? It is not rational to claim that all things exist before His birth. If there is a birth, or a beginning, there should be an end. It is unreasonable to say that He is almighty. . . . If, with knowledge, God created man and all things at His will, then did He create man blindly or ignorantly? How could He create sinful things, crimes, ignorance, and even blasphemers? This would be unreasonable. If He did all these things, it would be unreasonable that God sent people into exile, to make them suffer, rather than allowing them to stay in Paradise. How could God create men who do not respect Him?
Taixu questions the existence of God because rationally if one looks at the world's situation there is no evidence of a god. He appears to tie this argument to the connections between Buddhism and science, and how superstition creates an obstacle on the path to enlightenment.
In Taixu’s own article “Science and Buddhism” he offers many interesting and original thoughts on science and superstition. Taixu’s main argument in the article is that all of the superstition in the world such as “The superstition of God or the restriction of the ego” and “the superstition of reality” prevent the advance of scientific discovery because of the closed-mindedness of the superstitious people to see beyond their beliefs. Taixu writes,
Science therefore, can never be the main support of Buddhism although it may act as a valuable auxiliary and much may be expected from uniting the two methods of investigation.
From his writings Taixu’s followers can grasp an understanding that he believes science is a valuable resource but because of people's steadfast faith in superstitions it will never be a successful asset to Buddhism. He seems to argue that science is a means to enlightenment but it will never allow someone to get there. In Taixu's words, "Scientific methods can only corroborate the Buddhist doctrine, they can never advance beyond it."
Don Pittman wrote a book entitled “Toward a Modern Chinese Buddhism” in which he analyzes Taixu’s reform efforts. One of his reform efforts was the attempt to make Pure Land Buddhism a reality.
If today, based on good knowledge of our minds, we can produce pure thoughts and work hard to accomplish good deeds. How hard can it be to transform an impure China into a Chinese pure land?... All persons have this force of mind, and since they already have the faculty (benneng) to create a pure land, they can all make the glorious vow to make this world into a pure land and work hard to achieve it."
This among many things was one of Taixu's greatest ideas of reform. He believed that the only way to end the suffering on this world was to bring the Pure Land to it. He attempted to do so through many means, including the reorganization of the Sangha. Unfortunately for Taixu, his attempts at global propagating the Dharma failed. Most of his institutions that were set up to help bring about this better life were crushed by many different things, including the communists.