Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Simply Buddhism: Mantrayana Vs Sutrayana (秘宗与显教)

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Revision as of 11:37, 21 March 2016 by VTao (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Manjushri 01.jpg
Shantideva-4cbd5.JPG



I post this article specially aim at those friends lost in the world of Buddhism:

Many people stumbled into Buddhism and expect all Buddhist schools are created equal would experience a culture shock of their lives. The fact is that teachings in various schools can go to both extreme ends;

unlike the highly standardized teachings in other standard religions. Basically Buddhism is subdivided into two schools: the Mantrayana and the Sutrayana.

Mantrayana or Tantric Buddhism as we know it today consists of two major schools:

the Indo-Tibetan and Sino-Japan. The Sino-Japan is grouped under the lower 3 stages while the Indo-Tibetan system takes up the upper 6 stages of all 9 stages of Buddhism.

The difference between the two system lies in that the Anuttara Tantra which is an important part of Indo-Tibetan system and the related sex yoga failed to spread in China and Japan due to Confucianism.

Sutrayana can also be subdivided into the Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism. Mahayana is the Buddhism that spread from India to China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam which is also known as the ‘Northern Tradition’.

The Theravada Buddhism spread from India down south to Sri Lanka, to Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia and Indonesia. Now comes the fun part: the arguments of which school is authentic never ceased until today:

Within general Buddhism, Sutrayana attacks Mantrayana especially the Indo-Tibetan system as not Buddhism because of the worships of Hindu deities and yab-yum deities (two deities hugged together naked).

Within the Sutrayana: the Mahayana said that their teaching can achieve enlightenment while the Theravada teachings cannot.

Indo-Tibetan systems also have many controversies on the practice of ‘liberation by slaughtering’ and the consumption of meat and alcohol.

Of course, time has changed now days as all Buddhist schools are treated as one. Everyone try to be politically correct and all practices are accepted as one Buddhism as a whole. Having said so, confusions remain as this liberty causes more confusion:


Do I eat meat or do I not?

If I pray to Buddha and get fortune, can I donate to charity organizations of other religions?

Can I worship Taoist deities together with Guanyin?

So, how does one go about in choosing which school is suitable?

Study the history of Buddhism thoroughly and understand the special traits of each school.

Follow just one school of thought that is if you believe that Buddhism is created all equal.

Finally, whatever you do, please don’t ask yourself this question:

“Have I regretted in following this school of thought?” For If you do, you will go crazy!

Source

http://liewsp1-magicsea.blogspot.com.au/2014/09/simply-buddhism-mantrayana-vs-sutrayana.html [[Category:]]