The Diamond Sutra In Sanskrit and English
The Diamond Sutra In Sanskrit and English
Translated from the Sanskrit by Edward Conze
Om namo Bhagavatyai Arya-Prajnaparamitayai! Homage to the Perfection of Wisdom, the Lovely, the Holy!
Evam maya srutam ekasmin samaye. Bhagavan Sravastyam viharati sma Jetavane'nathapindadasya-arame mahata bhiksu-samghena sarddham ardhatrayodasabhir bhiksu-sataih sambahulais ca bodhisattvair mahasattvaih.
Atha khalu Bhagavan purvahnakala-samaye nivasya patracivaram adaya Sravastim maha-nagarim pindaya praviksat. Atha khalu Bhagavan Sravastim maha-nagarim pindaya caritva krta-bhakta-krtyah pascadbhaktapindapata-pratikrantah patra-civaram pratisamya padau praksalya nyasidat prajnapta evaasane paryankam abhujya rjum kayam pranidhaya, pratimukhim smrtim upasthapya.
Atha khalu sambahula bhiksavo yena Bhagavams tenopasamkraman upasamkramya Bhagavatah padau sirobhir abhivandya Bhagavantam trispradaksinikrtyaikante nyasidan.
Thus have I heard at one time. The Lord dwelt at Sravasti, in the Jeta Grove, in the garden of Anathapindika, together with a large gathering of monks, consisting of 1,250 monks, and with many Bodhisattvas, great beings.
Early in the morning the Lord dressed, put on his cloak, took his bowl, and entered the great city of Sravasti to collect alms. When he had eaten and returned from his round, the Lord put away his bowl and cloak, washed his feet, and sat down on the seat arranged for him, crossing his legs, holding his body upright, and mindfully fixing his attention in front of him. Then many monks approached to where the Lord was, saluted his feet with their heads, thrice walked round him to the right, and sat down on one side.
Tena khalu punah samayena-ayusman Subhutis tasyam eva parsadi samnipatito'bhut samnisannah. Atha khalv ayusman Subhutir utthaya-asanad, ekamsam uttarasangham krtva, daksinam janu-mandalam prthivyam pratisthapya, yena Bhagavams tena-anjalim pranamya Bhagavantam etad avocat: Ascaryam Bhagavan parama-ascaryam Sugata, yavad eva Tathagatena-arhata samyaksambuddhena bodhisattva mahasattva anuparigrhitah paramenaanugrahena. Ascaryam Bhagavan yavad eva Tathagatena-arhata samyaksambuddhena bodhisattva mahasattvah parinditah paramaya parindanaya. Tat katham Bhagavan bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitena kulaputrena va kuladuhitra va sthatavyam katham pratipattavyam katham cittam pragrahitavyam?
At that time the Venerable Subhuti came to that assembly, and sat down. Then he rose from his seat, put his upper robe over one shoulder, placed his right knee on the ground, bent forth his folded hands towards the Lord, and said to the Lord: 'It is wonderful O Lord, it is exceedingly wonderful, O Well-Gone, how much the Bodhisattvas, the great beings, have been helped with the greatest help by the Tathagata, the Arhat, the Fully Enlightened One.
It is wonderful, O Lord, how much the Bodhisattvas, the great beings, have been favoured with the highest favour by the Tathagata, the Arhat, the Fully Enlightened One. How then, O Lord, should a son or daughter of good family, who have set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle, stand, how progress, how control their thoughts?'
Evam ukte Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Sadhu sadhu Subhute, evam etad yatha vadasi. Anuparigrhitas Tathagatena bodhisattva mahasattvah paramena-anugrahena, parinditas Tathagatena bodhisattva mahasattvah paramaya parindanaya. Tena hi Subhute srnu sadhu ca susthu ca manasikuru, bhasisye 'ham te yatha bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitena sthatavyam yatha pratipattavyam yatha cittam pragrahitavyam. Evam Bhagavann ity ayusman Subhutir Bhagavatah pratyasrausit.
After these words the Lord said to the Venerable Subhuti: 'Well said, well said, Subhuti! So it is, Subhuti, so it is, as you say! The Tathagata, Subhuti, has helped the Bodhisattvas, the great beings with the greatest help, and he has favoured them with the highest favour. Therefore, 'Subhuti, listen well, and attentively! I will teach you how those who have set out in the Bodhisattva vehicle should stand, how progress, how control their thoughts.'
'So be it, O Lord', replied the Venerable Subhuti and listened.
Bhagavan etad avocat: Iha Subhute bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitena evam cittam utpadayitavyam: Yavantah Subhute sattvah sattvadhatau sattva-samgrahena samgrhita anda-ja va jarayu-ja va samsveda-ja vaupapaduka va, rupino va-arupino va, samjnino va-asamjnino va naiva samjnino na-asamjnino va, yavan kascit sattvadhatu-prajnapyamanah prajnapyate, te ca maya sarve nupadhisese nirvana-dhatau parinirvapayitavyah.
Evam aparimanam api sattvan parinirvapya na kascit sattvah parinirvapito bhavati. Tat kasya hetoh? Sacet Subhute bodhisattvasya sattva-samjna pravarteta, na sa bodhisattva iti vaktavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Na sa Subhute bodhisattvo vaktavyo yasya-atma-samjna pravarteta, sattva-samjna va jiva-samjna va pudgala-samjna va pravarteta.
The Lord said: Here, Subhuti, someone who has set out in the vehicle of a Bodhisattva should produce a thought in this manner: 'As many beings as there are in the universe of beings, comprehended under the term "beings" egg-born, born from a womb, moisture-born, or miraculously born; with or without form; with perception, without perception, and with neither perception nor non-perception, as far as any conceivable form of beings is conceived: all these I must lead to Nirvana, into that Realm of Nirvana which leaves nothing behind.
And yet, although innumerable beings have thus been led to Nirvana, no being at all has been led to Nirvana.' And why? If in a Bodhisattva the notion of a 'being' should take place, he could not be called a 'Bodhi-being'. 'And why? He is not to be called a Bodhi-being, in whom the notion of a self or of a being should take place, or the notion of a living soul or of a person.'
Api tu khalu punah Subhute na bodhisattvena vastu-pratisthitena danam datavyam, na kvacit pratisthitena danam datavyam, na-rupa-pratisthitena danam datavyam, na sabda-gandha-rasasprastavya-dharmesu pratisthitena danam datavyam.
Evam hi Subhute bodhisattvena mahasattvena danam datavyam yatha na nimitta-samjnayam api pratitisthet. Tat kasya hetoh? Yah Subhute'pratisthito danam dadati, tasya Subhute punya-skandhasya na sukaram pramanam udgrahitum. Tat kim manyase Subhute sukaram purvasyam disy akasasya pramanam udgrahitum? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan. Bhagavan aha: Evam daksinapascima-uttara-asvadha-urdhvam digvidiksu samantad dasasu diksu sukaram akasasya pramanam udgrahitum? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan. Bhagavan aha: Evam eva Subhute yo bodhisattvo' pratisthito danam dadati, tasya Subhute punya-skandhasya na sukaram pramanam udgrahitum. Evam hi Subhute bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitena danam datavyam yatha na nimitta-samjnayam api pratitisthet.
Moreover, Subhuti, a Bodhisattva who gives a gift should not be supported by a thing, nor should he be supported anywhere. When he gives gifts he should not be supported by sight objects, nor by sounds, smells, tastes, touchables, or mind-objects. For, Subhuti, the Bodhisattva, the great being should give gifts in such a way that he is not supported by the notion of a sign.
And why? Because the heap of merit of that Bodhi-being, who unsupported gives a gift, is not easy to measure. What do you think, Subhuti, is the extent of space in the East easy to measure? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. The Lord asked: In like manner, is it easy to measure the extent of space in the South, West or North, downwards, upwards, in the intermediate directions, in all the ten directions all round? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. The Lord said: Even so the heap of merit of that Bodhibeing who unsupported gives a gift is not easy to measure. That is why, Subhuti, those who have set out in the Bodhisattva vehicle, should give gifts without being supported by the notion of a sign.
Tat kim manyase Subhute laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Ya sa Bhagavan laksana-sampat Tathagatena bhasita saiva-alaksana-sampat. Evam ukte Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Yavat Subhute laksana-sampat tavan mrsa, yavad alaksana-sampat tavan na mrseti hi laksana-alaksanatas Tathagato drastavyah.
The Lord continued: 'What do you think, Subhuti, can the Tathagata be seen by the possession of his marks?' Subhuti replied: 'No indeed, O Lord. And why? What has been taught by the Tathagata as the possession of marks, that is truly a no-possession of no-marks.' The Lord said: 'Wherever there is possession of marks, there is fraud, wherever there is no possession of no-marks there is no fraud. Hence the Tathagata is to be seen from no marks as marks.'
Evam ukte ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Asti Bhagavan kecit sattva bhavisyanty anagate' dhvani pascime kale pascime samaye pascimayam panca-satyam saddharma-vipraloka-kale vartamane, ya imesv evamrupesu sutranta-padesu bhasyamanesu bhuta-samjnam utpadayisyanti? Bhagavan aha: Ma Subhute tvam evam vocah. Asti kecit sattva bhavisyanty anagate' dhvani pascime kale pascime samaye pascimayam pancasatyam sad-dharma-vipralope vartamane, ya imesv evamrupesu sutrantapadesu bhasyamanesu bhutasamjnam utpadayisyanti. Api tu khalu punah Subhute
bhavisyanty anagate' dhvani bodhisattva mahasattvah pascime kale pascime samaye pascimayam panca-satyam saddharma-vipralope vartamane gunavantah silavantah prajnavantas ca bhavisyanti, ya imesv evamrupesu sutranta-padesu bhasyamanesu bhutasamjnam utpadayisyanti. Na khalu punas te Subhute bodhisattva mahasattva eka-buddha-paryupasita bhavisyanti, na-eka-buddhaavaropita-kusala-mula bhavisyanti, api tu khalu
punah Subhute aneka-buddha-satasahasraparyupasita aneka-buddha-satasahasra-avaropita-kusala-mulas te bodhisattva mahasattva bhavisyanti, ya imesv evamrupesu sutranta-padesu bhasyamanesv eka-citta-prasadam api pratilapsyante. Jnatas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-jnanena, drstas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-caksusa, buddhas te Subhute Tathagatena. Sarve te Subhute' prameyam asamkhyeyam punyaskandham prasavisyanti pratigrahisyanti.
Subhuti asked: Will there be any beings in the future period, in the last time, in the last epoch, in the last 500 years, at the time of the collapse of the good doctrine who, when these words of the Sutra are being taught, will understand their truth? The Lord replied: Do not speak thus, Subhuti! Yes, even then there will be such beings. For even at that time, Subhuti, there will be Bodhisattvas who are gifted with good conduct, gifted, with virtuous qualities, gifted with wisdom, and who, when these words of the Sutra are being taught, will understand their truth.
And these Bodhisattvas, Subhuti, will not be such as have honoured only one single Buddha, nor such as have planted their roots of merit under one single Buddha only. On the contrary, Subhuti, those Bodhisattvas who, when these words of the Sutra are being taught, will find even one single thought of serene faith, they will be such as have honoured many hundreds of thousands of Buddhas, such as have planted their roots of merit under many hundreds of thousands of Buddhas.
Known they are, Subhuti, to the Tathagata through his Buddha cognition, seen they are, Subhuti, by the Tathagata with his Buddha-eye, fully known they are, Subhuti, to the Tathagata. And they all, Subhuti, will beget and acquire an immeasurable and incalculable heap of merit.
Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi Subhute tesam bodhisattvanam mahasattvanam atma-samjna pravartate na sattva-samjna na jiva-samjna na pudgala-samjna pravartate. Na-api tesam Subhute bodhisattvanam mahasattvanam dharma-samjna pravartate, evam na-adharmasamjna. Na-api tesam Subhute samjna na-asamjna pravartate.
And why? Because, Subhuti, in these Bodhisattvas (1) no perception of a self takes place,
(2) no perception of a being,
(4) no perception of a person. Nor do these Bodhisattvas have
(5) a perception of a dharma, or
(6) a perception of a no-dharma.
(7) No perception or
(8) non-perception takes place in them.
Tat kasya hetoh? Sacet Subhute tesam bodhisattvanam mahasattvanam dharma-samjna pravarteta, sa eva tesam atma-graho bhavet, sattva-graho jiva-grahah pudgala-graho bhavet. Saced a-dharma-samjna pravarteta, sa eva tesam atma-graho bhavet, sattva-graho jiva-grahah pudgala-graha iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na khalu punah Subhute bodhisattvena mahasattvena dharma udgrahitavyo na-adharmah. Tasmad iyam Tathagatena sandhya vag bhasita: Kolopamam dharma-paryayam ajanadbhir dharma eva prahatavyah prag eva-adharma iti.
And why? If, Subhuti, these Bodhisattvas should have a perception of either a dharma, or a no-dharma, they would thereby seize on a self, a being, a soul, or a person. And why? Because a Bodhisattva should not seize on either a dharma or a no-dharma. Therefore this saying has been taught by the Tathagata with a hidden meaning: 'Those who know the discourse on dharma as like unto a raft, should forsake dharmas, still more so no-dharmas.'
Punar aparam Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Tat kim manyase Subhute, asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena-anuttara samyaksambodhir ity abhisambuddhah, kascid va dharmas Tathagatena desitah? Evam ukta ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Yatha-aham Bhagavan Bhagavato bhasitasya-artham ajanami, na-asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena-anuttara samyaksambodhir ity abhisambuddhah, na-asti dharmo yas Tathagatena desitah. Tat kasya hetoh? Yo'sau Tathagatena dharmo'bhisambuddho desito va, agrahyah so'nabhilapyah, na sa dharmo na-adharmah. Tat kasya hetoh? Asamskrtaprabhavita hy aryapudgalah.
The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, is there any dharma which the Tathagata has fully known as 'the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment, or is there any dharma which the Tathagata has demonstrated? Subhuti replied: No, not as I understand what the Lord has said. And why? This dharma which the Tathagata has fully known or demonstrated it cannot be grasped, it cannot be talked about, it is neither a dharma nor a no-dharma. And why? Because an Absolute exalts the Holy Persons.
Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute yah kascit kulaputro va kuladuhita vemam trisahasramahasahasram lokadhatum sapta-ratnaparipurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo' rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, api nu sa kulaputro va kuladuhita va tato nidanam bahutaram punya-skandham prasunuyat? Subhutir aha: Bahu Bhagavan bahu Sugata sa kulaputro va kuladuhita va tato nidanam punya-skandham prasunuyat. Tat kasya hetoh? Yo'sau Bhagavan punya-skandhas Tathagatena bhasitah, a-skandhah sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tasmat Tathagato bhasate: Punya-skandhah punya-skandha iti.
Bhagavan aha: Yas ca khalu punah Subhute kulaputro va kuladuhita vemam trisahasramahasahasram lokadhatum saptaratna-paripurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo' rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, yas ceto dharma-paryayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham udgrhya parebhyo vistarena desayet samprakasayed, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punya-skandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam. Tat kasya hetoh? Ato nirjata hi Subhute Tathagatanam arhatam samyaksambuddhanam anuttara samyaksambodhir, ato nirjatas ca Buddha Bhagavantah. Tat kasya hetoh? Buddhadharma buddhadharma iti Subhute 'buddhadharmas caiva te Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyante buddhadharma iti.
The Lord then asked: What do you think, Subhuti, if a son or daughter of good family had filled this world system of 1,000 million worlds with the seven precious things, and then gave it as a gift to the Tathagatas, Arhats, Fully Enlightened Ones, would they on the strength of that beget a great heap of merit? Subbuti replied: Great, O Lord, great, O Well-Gone, would that heap of merit be! And why? Because the Tathagata spoke of the 'heap of merit' as a nonheap.
That is how the Tathagata speaks of 'heap of merit'. The Lord said: But if someone else were to take from this discourse on dharma but one stanza of four lines, and would demonstrate and illuminate it in full detail to others, then he would on the strength of that beget a still greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable. And why? Because from it has issued the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment of the Tathagatas, Arhats, Fully Enlightened Ones, and from it have issued the Buddhas, the Lords. And why? For the Tathagata has taught that the dharmas special to the Buddhas are just not a Buddha's special dharmas.
That is why they are called 'the dharmas special to the Buddhas'.
Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nu srotaapannasyaivam bhavati: Maya srotaapatti-phalam praptam iti? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na srotaapannasyaivam bhavati: Maya srotaapatti-phalam praptam iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi sa Bhagavan kamcid dharmam apannah. Tenocyate srotaapanna iti. Na rupam apanno na sabdan na gandhan na rasan na sprastavyan na dharman apannah. Tenocyate srotaapanna iti. Saced Bhagavan
srotaapannasyaivam bhaven: Maya srotaapatti-phalam praptam iti, sa eva tasya-atma-graho bhavet sattva-graho jiva-grahah pudgala-graho bhaved iti. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nu sakrdagamina evam bhavati: Maya sakrdagami-phalam praptam iti? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na sakrdagamina evam bhavati: Maya sakrdagami-phalam praptam iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi sa kascid dharmo yah sakrdagamitvam apannah. Tenocyate sakrdagami-iti. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nv anagamina evam bhavati: Maya-anagami-phalam praptam iti?
Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na-anagamina evam bhavati: Maya-anagami-phalam-praptam iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi sa Bhagavan kascid dharmo yo'nagamitvam apannah. Tenocyate'nagami-iti. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nv arhata evam bhavati: Maya-arhattvam praptam iti? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na-arhata evam bhavati: Maya-arhattvam praptam iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi sa Bhagavan kascid dharmo yo'rhan nama. Tenocyate' rhann iti. Saced Bhagavan arhata evam bhaven: Maya-arhattvam praptam iti, sa eva tasya-atma-graho bhavet sattva-graho jiva-
grahah pudgala-graho bhavet. Tat kasya hetoh? Aham asmi Bhagavams Tathagatena-arhata samyaksambuddhena-arana-viharinam agryo nirdistah. Aham asmi Bhagavann arhan vitaragah. Na ca me Bhagavann evam bhavati: Arhann asmy aham vitaraga iti. Sacen mama Bhagavann evam bhaven: Maya-arhattvam praptam iti, na mam Tathagato vyakarisyad: Arana-viharinam agryah Subhutih kulaputro na kvacid viharati, tenocyate'rana-vihary aranavihari-iti.
The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does it occur to the Streamwinner, 'by me has the fruit of a Streamwinner been attained'? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. And why? Because, O Lord, he has not won any dharma. Therefore is he called a Stream-winner. No sight-object has been won, no sounds, smells, tastes, touchables, or objects of mind. That is why he is called a 'Streamwinner'. If, O Lord, it would occur to a Streamwinner, 'by me has a Streamwinner's fruit been attained', then that would be in him a seizing on a self, seizing on a being, seizing
on a soul, seizing on a person. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does it then occur to the Once-Returner, 'by me has the fruit of a Once-Returner been attained'? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. And why? Because there is not any dharma that has won Once-Returnership. That is why he is called a 'Once-Returner'. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does it then occur to the Never-Returner 'by me has the fruit of a Never-Returner been attained'? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. And why? Because there is not any dharma that has won Never
Returnership. Therefore is he called a 'Never-Returner'. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does it then occur to the Arhat, 'by me has Arhatship been attained'? Subhuti: No indeed, O Lord. And why? Because no dharma is called 'Arhat'. That is why he is called an Arhat. If, O Lord, it would occur to an Arhat. 'by me has Arhatship been attained', then that would be in him a seizing on a self, seizing on a being, seizing on a soul, seizing on a person. And why? I am, O Lord, the one whom the Tathagata, the Arhat, the Fully Enlightened One has
pointed out as the foremost of those who dwell in Peace. I am, O Lord, an Arhat free from greed. And yet, O Lord, it does not occur to me, 'an Arhat am I and free from greed'. If, O Lord, it could occur to me that I have attained Arhatship, then the Tathagata would not have declared of me that 'Subhuti, this son of good family, who is the foremost of those who dwell in Peace, does not dwell anywhere; that is why he is called "a dweller in Peace, a dweller in Peace"'.
Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena Dipankarasya Tathagatasya-arhatah samyaksambuddhasya-antikad udgrhitah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na-asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena Dipankarasya Tathagatasyaarhatah samyaksambuddhasya-antikad udgrhitah.
The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, is there any dharma which the Tathagata has learned from Dipankara, the Tathagata, the Arhat, the Fully Enlightened One? Subhuti replied: Not so, O Lord, there is not.
Bhagavan aha: Yah kascit Subhute bodhisattva evam vaded: Aham ksetra-vyuhan nispadayisyami-iti, sa vitatham vadet. Tat kasya hetoh? Ksetra-vyuhah ksetra-vyuha iti Subhute, 'vyuhas te Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyante ksetra-vyuha iti.
The Lord said: If any Bodhisattva would say, 'I will create harmonious Buddhafields', he would speak falsely. And why? 'The harmonies of Buddhafields, the harmonies of Buddhafields', Subhuti, as no-harmonies have they been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore he spoke of
'harmonious Buddhafields'. Tasmat tarhi Subhute bodhisattvena mahasattvenaivam apratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam yan na kvacit-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam, na rupa-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam na sabda-gandha-rasa-sprastavya-dharma-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam.
Therefore then, Subhuti, the Bodhisattva, the great being, should produce an unsupported thought, i.e. a thought which is nowhere supported, a thought unsupported by sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touchables or mind-objects.
Tad yathapi nama Subhute puruso bhaved upeta-kayo maha-kayo vat tasyaivamrupa atmabhavah syat tad yathapi nama Sumeruh parvata-raja, tat kim manyase Subhute api nu mahan sa atmabhavo bhavet? Subhutir aha: Mahan sa Bhagavan mahan Sugata sa atma-bhavo bhavet. Tat kasya hetoh? Atma-bhava atma-bhava iti Bhagavann a-bhavah sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyata atma-bhava iti. Na hi Bhagavan sa bhavo na-abhavah. Tenocyata atmabhava iti.
Suppose, Subhuti, there were a man endowed with a body, a huge body, so that he had a personal existence like Sumeru, king of mountains. Would that, Subhuti, be a huge personal existence? Subhuti replied: Yes, huge, O Lord, huge, O Well-Gone, would his personal existence be. And why so? 'Personal existence, personal existence', as no-existence has that been taught by the Tathagata; for not, O Lord, is that existence or non-existence. Therefore is it called 'personal existence'.
Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute yavatyo Gangayam mahanadyam valukas tavatya eva Ganga-nadyo bhaveyuh, tasu ya valuka api nu ta bahavyo bhaveyuh? Subhutir aha: Ta eva tavad Bhagavan bahavyo Ganga-nadyo bhaveyuh, prag eva yas tasu Ganga-nadisu valukah. Bhagavan aha: Arocayami te Subhute prativedayami te yavatyas tasu Ganga-nadisu valuka bhaveyus, tavato loka-dhatun kascid eva stri va puruso va sapta-ratna-paripurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, tat kim manyase Subhute, api nu sa stri va puruso va tato nidanam
bahu punyaskandham prasunuyat? Subhutir aha: Bahu Bhagavan bahu Sugata stri va puruso va tato nidanam punya-skandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam. Bhagavan aha: Yas ca khalu punah Subhute stri va puruso va tavato loka-dhatun sapta-ratna-paripurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, yas ca kulaputro va kuladuhita veto dharma-paryayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham
udgrhya parebhyo desayet samprakasayed, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punya-skandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam. Api tu khalu punah Subhute yasmin prthivi-pradesa ito dharma-paryayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham udgrhya bhasyeta va samprakasyeta va, sa prthivi-pradesas
caityabhuto bhavet sa-devamanusa-asurasya lokasya; kah punar vado ya imam dharma-pryayam sakala-samaptam dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti, paramena te Subhute ascaryena samanvagata bhavisyanti. Tasmims ca Subhute prthivipradese sasta viharaty anyatara-anyataro va vijnaguru-sthaniyah.
The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, if there were as many Ganges rivers as there are grains of sand in the large river Ganges, would the grains of sand in them be many? Subhuti replied: Those Ganges rivers would indeed be many, much more so the grains of sand in them. The Lord said: This is what I announce to you, Subhuti, this is what I make known to you, if some woman or man had filled with the seven precious
things as many world systems as there are grains of sand in those Ganges rivers, and would give them as a gift to the Tathagatas, Arhats, fully Enlightened Ones what do you think, Subhuti, would that woman or man on the strength of that beget a great heap of merit? Subhuti replied: Great, O Lord, great O Well-Gone, would that heap of merit be, immeasurable and incalculable. The Lord said: But if a son or
daughter of good family had taken from this discourse on dharma but one stanza of four lines, and were to demonstrate and illuminate it to others, then they would on the strength of that beget a still greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable. Moreover, Subhuti, that spot of earth where one has taken from this discourse on dharma but one stanza of four lines, taught or illumined it, that spot of earth will be a veritable shrine for the whole world with its gods, men and Asuras. What then should we say of those who will bear in mind this
discourse on dharma in its entirety, who will recite, study, and illuminate it in full detail for others! Most wonderfully blest, Subhuti, they will be! And on that spot of earth, Subhuti, either the Teacher dwells, or a sage representing him. Evam ukta ayusman Subhutir
Bhagavantam etad avocat: Ko nama-ayam Bhagavan dharmaparyayah, katham cainam dharayami? Evam ukte Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Prajnaparamita nama-ayam Subhute dharma-paryayah, evam cainam dharaya. Subhuti asked: What then, O Lord, is this discourse on dharma, and how should I bear it in mind? The Lord replied: This discourse on dharma, Subhuti, is called 'Wisdom which has gone beyond', and as such should you bear it in mind!
Tat kasya hetoh? Subhute prajnapa ramita Tathagatena bhasita saiva-a-paramita Tathagatena bhasita. Tenocyate prajnaparamiteti. Tat kim manyase Subhute api nv asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena bhasitah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na-asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena bhasitah. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, yavat trisahasramahasahasre loka-dhatuu prthivi-rajah kacit tad bahu bhavet? Subhutir aha: Bahu Bhagavan bahu Sugata prthivi-rajo bhavet. Tat kasya hetoh? Yat tad Bhagavan prthivi-rajas Tathagatena bhasitam arajas tad
Bhagavams Tathagatena bhasitam. Tenocyate prthivi-raja iti. Yo'py asau loka-dhatus Tathagatena bhasito 'dhatuh sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyate lokadhatur iti. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute dvatrimsan mahapurusa-laksanais Tathagato 'rhan samyaksambuddho drastavyah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na dvatrimsanmahapurusa-laksanais Tathagato'rhan samyaksambuddho drastavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Yani hi tani Bhagavan dvatrimsan-mahapurusa-laksanani Tathagatena bhasitany, a-laksanani tani Bhagavams Tathagatena bhasitani. Tenocyante dvatrimsan-mahapurusa-laksanani-iti.
And why? Just that which the Tathagata has taught as the wisdom which has gone beyond, just that He has taught as not gone beyond. Therefore is it called 'Wisdom which has gone beyond'. What do you think, Subhuti, is there any dharma which the Tathagata has taught? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord, there is not. The Lord said: When, Subhuti, you consider the number of particles of dust in this world system of 1,000
million worlds-would they be many? Subhuti replied: Yes, O Lord. Because what was taught as particles of dust by the Tathagata, as no-particles that was taught by the Tathagata. Therefore are they called 'particles of dust'. And this world-system the Tathagata has taught as no-system. Therefore is it called a 'world system'. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, can the Tathagata be seen by means of the
thirty-two marks of the superman? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. And why? Because those thirty-two marks of the superman which were taught by the Tathagata, they are no-marks. Therefore are they called 'the thirty-two marks of the superman'.
Bhagavan aha: Yas ca khalu punah Subhute stri va puruso va dine dine Ganga-nadi-valukasaman atma-bhavan parityajet, evam parityajan Ganga-nadi-valuka-saman kalpams tan atmabhavan parityajet, yas ceto dharma-paryayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham udgrhya parebhyo desayet samprakasayed, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punya-skandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam.
The Lord said: And again, Subhuti, suppose a woman or a man were to renounce all their belongings as many times as there are grains of sand in the river Ganges; and suppose that someone else, after taking from this discourse on Dharma but one stanza of four lines, would demonstrate it to others. Then this latter on the strength of that would beget a greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable.
Atha khalv ayusman Subhutir dharma-vegena-asru-ni pramuncat, so' sruni pramrjya Bhagavantam etad avocat: Ascaryam Bhagavan parama-ascaryam Sugata, yavad ayam dharma-paryayas Tathagatena bhasito, 'gra-yana-samprasthitanam sattvanam arthaya sresthayana-samprasthitanam arthaya, yato me Bhagavan jnanam utpannam. Na maya Bhagavan jatv evamrupo dharmaparyayah sruta-purvah. Paramena te Bhagavann ascaryena samanvagata
bodhisattva bhavisyanti ya iha sutre bhasyamane srutva bhuta-samjnam utpadayisyanti. Tat kasya hetoh? Ya caisa Bhagavan bhuta-samjna saiva-abhuta-samjna. Tasmat Tathagato bhasate bhuta-samjna bhuta-samjneti. Na mama Bhagavan duskaram yad aham imam dharmaparyayam bhasyamanam avakalpayamy adhimucye. Ye 'pi te Bhagavan sattva bhavisyanty anagate 'dhvani pascime kale pascime samaye pascimayam panca-satyam
saddharmavipralope vartamane, ya imam Bhagavan dharma-paryayam udgrahisyanti dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti, te parama-ascaryena samanvagata bhavisyanti. Api tu khalu punar Bhagavan na tesam atma-samjna pravartisyate, na sattva-samjna na jiva-samjna na pudgala-samjna pravartisyate, na-api tesam kacit samjna na-a-samjna pravartate. Tat kasya hetoh? Ya sa Bhagavann atma-samjna saiva-a-samjna, ya sattva-samjna jiva-samjna pudgala-samjna saiva-a-samjna. Tat kasya hetoh? Sarva-samjnaapagata hi Buddha Bhagavantah.
Thereupon the impact of Dharma moved the Venerable Subhuti to tears. Having wiped away his tears, he thus spoke to the Lord: It is wonderful, O Lord, it is exceedingly wonderful, O Well-Gone, how well the Tathagata has taught this discourse on Dharma. Through it cognition has been produced in me. Not have I ever before heard such a discourse on Dharma. Most wonderfully blest will be those who, when this Sutra is being taught, will produce a true perception. And that which is true perception, that is indeed no perception. Therefore the Tathagata teaches,
'true perception, true perceptions'. It is not difficult for me to accept and believe this discourse on Dharma when it is being taught. But those beings who will be in a future period, in the last time, in the last epoch, in the last 500 years, at the time of the collapse of the good doctrine, and who, O Lord, will take up this discourse on Dharma, bear it in mind,
recite it, study it, and illuminate it in full detail for others, these will be most wonderfully blest. In them, however, no perception of a self will take place, or of a being, a soul, or a person. And why? That, O Lord, which is perception of self, that is indeed no perception. That which is perception of a being, a soul or a person, that is indeed no perception. And why? Because the Buddhas, the Lords have left all perceptions behind.
Evam ukte Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Evam etat Subhute evam etat. Parama-ascarya-samanvagatas te sattva bhavisyanti ya iha Subhute sutre bhasyamane nottrasisyanti na samtrasisyanti na samtrasam apatsyante. Tat kasya hetoh? Paramaparamiteyam Subhute Tathagatena bhasita yaduta-a-paramita. Yam ca Subhute Tathagatah parama-paramitam bhasate, tam aparimana-api Buddha Bhagavanto bhasante, tenocyate
parama-paramiteti. The Lord said: So it is, Subhuti. Most wonderfully blest will be those beings who, on hearing this Sutra, will not tremble, nor be frightened, or terrified. And why? The Tathagata has taught this as the highest (parama-) perfection (paramita). And what the Tathagata teaches as the highest perfection, that also the innumerable (aparimana) Blessed Buddhas do teach. Therefore is it called the 'highest perfection'.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute ya Tathagatasya ksanti-paramita saiva-a-paramita. Tat kasya hetoh? Yada me Subhute Kalinga raja-anga-pratyanga-mamsany acchaitsit, tasmin samaya atma-samjna va sattva-samjna va jiva-samjna va pudgala-samjna va na-api me kacit samjna va-a-samjna va babhuva. Tat kasya hetoh? Sacen me Subhute tasmin samaya atma-samjnaabhavisyad vyapada-samjna-api me tasmin samaye'bhavisyat. Sacet sattva-samjna jiva-samjna pudgala-samjna-abhavisyad, vyapada-samjna-api me tasmin samaye'bhavisyat. Tat kasya hetoh? Abhijanamy aham Subhute'tite'dhvani panca-jati-satani yad aham Ksantivadi rsir abhuvam. Tatra-api me na-atma-samjna babhuva, na-sattva-samjna na jiva-samjna na pudgala-samjna babhuva.
Moreover, Subhuti, the Tathagata's perfection of patience is really no perfection. And why? Because, Subhuti, when the king of Kalinga cut my flesh from every limb, at that time I had no perception of a self, of a being, of a soul, or a person. And why? If, Subhuti, at that time I had had a perception of self, I would also have had a perception of ill-will at that time. And so, if I had had a perception of a being, of a soul, or of a person. With my superknowledge I recall that in the past I have for five hundred births led the life of a sage devoted to patience. Then also have I had no perception of a self, a being, a soul, or a person.
Tasmat tarhi Subhute bodhisattvena mahasattvena sarva-samjna-vivarjayitva-anuttarayam samyaksambodhau cittam utpadayitavyam. Na rupa-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam, na sabda-gandha-rasa-sprastavya-dharma-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam, na dharmapratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam, na adharma-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam, na kvacit-pratisthitam cittam utpadayitavyam. Tat kasya hetoh? Yat pratisthitam tad evaapratisthitam. Tasmad eva Tathagato bhasate: Apratisthitena bodhisattvena danam datavyam. Na rupa-sabda-gandha-rasa-sprastavya-dharma-pratisthitena danam datavyam.
Therefore then, Subhuti, the Bodhi-being, the great being, after he has got rid of all perceptions, should raise his thought to the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment. He should produce a thought which is unsupported by forms, sounds, smells, tastes, touchables, or mindobjects, unsupported by dharma, unsupported by no-dharma,
unsupported by anything. And why? All supports have actually no support. It is for this reason that the Tathagata teaches: By an unsupported Bodhisattva should a gift be given, not by one who is supported by forms, sounds, smells, tastes, touchables, or mind-objects.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute bodhisattvenaivamrupo dana-parityagah kartavyah sarvasattvanam arthaya. Tat kasya hetoh? Ya caisa Subhute sattva-samjna saiva-a-samjna. Ya evam te sarva-sattvas Tathagatena bhasitas ta eva-a-sattvah. Tat kasya hetoh? Bhuta-vadi Subhute Tathagatah satyavadi tathavady ananyathavadi Tathagatah. Na vitatha-vadi Tathagatah.
And further, Subhuti, it is for the weal of all beings that a Bodhisattva should give gifts in this manner. And why? This perception of a being, Subhuti, that is just a non-perception. Those all-beings of whom the Tathagata has spoken, they are indeed no-beings. And why? Because the Tathagata speaks in accordance with reality, speaks the truth, speaks of what is, not otherwise. A Tathagata does not speak falsely.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute yas Tathagatena dharmo 'bhisambuddho desito nidhyato, na tatra satyam na mrsa. Tadyatha-api nama Subhute puruso 'ndhakara-pravisto na kimcid api pasyet, evam vastu-patito bodhisattvo drastavyo yo vastu-patito danam parityajati. Tadyatha-api nama Subhute caksusman purusah prabhatayam ratrau surye'bhyudgate nanavidhani rupani pasyet, evam a-vastu-patito bodhisattvo drastavyo yo'vastu-patito danam parityajati.
But nevertheless, Subhuti, with regard to that dharma which the Tathagata has fully known and demonstrated, on account of that there is neither truth nor fraud. In darkness a man could not see anything. Just so should be viewed a Bodhisattva who has fallen among things, and who, fallen among things, renounces a gift. A man with eyes would, when the night becomes light and the sun has arisen, see manifold forms. Just so should be viewed a Bodhisattva who has not fallen among things, and who, without having fallen among things, renounces a gift.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute ye kulaputra va kuladuhitaro vemam dharmaparyayam udgrahisyanti dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti, jnatas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-jnanena, drstas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-caksusa, buddhas te Tathagatena. Sarve te Subhute sattva aprameyam asamkhyeyam punya-skandham prasavisyanti pratigrahisyanti. Yas ca khalu punah Subhute stri va puruso va purva-ahna-kala-samaye Ganga-nadi-valuka-saman atmabhavan parityajet, evam madhya-ahna-kala-samaye Ganga-
nadi-valuka-saman atmabhavan parityajet, sayaahna-kala-samaye Ganga-nadi-valuka-saman atmabhavan parityajet, anena paryayena bahuni kalpa-koti-niyuta-satasahasrany atmabhavan parityajet; yas cemam dharmaparyayam srutva na pratiksipet, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punyaskandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam. Kah punar vado yo likhitvodgrhniyad dharayed vacayet paryavapnuyat parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayet.
Furthermore, Subhuti, those sons and daughters of good family who will take up this discourse on Dharma, will bear it in mind, recite, study, and illuminate it in full detail for others, they have been known, Subhuti, by the Tathagata with his Buddha-cognition, they have been seen, Subhuti, by the Tathagata with his Buddha-eye, they have been fully known by the Tathagata. All these beings, Subhuti, will beget and acquire an immeasurable and incalculable heap of merit. And if,
Subhuti, a woman or man should renounce in the morning all their belongings as many times as there are grains of sand in the river Ganges, and if they should do likewise at noon and in the evening, and if in this way they should renounce all their belongings for many hundreds of thousands of millions of milliards of aeons; and someone else, on hearing this discourse on
Dharma, would not reject it; then the latter would on the strength of that beget a greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable. What then should we say of him who, after writing it, would learn it, bear it in mind, recite, study and illuminate it in full detail for others?
Api tu khalu punah Subhute 'cintyo' tulyo 'yam dharmaparyayah. Ayam ca Subhute dharmaparyayas Tathagatena bhasito'gra-yana-samprasthitanam sattvanam arthaya sresthayana-samprasthitanam sattvanam arthaya, ya imam dharma-paryayam udgrahisyanti dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti, jnatas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-jnanena, drstas te Subhute Tathagatena buddha-
caksusa, buddhas te Tathagatena. Sarve te Subhute sattva aprameyena punya-skandhena samanvagata bhavisyanti, acintyena-atulyena-amapyena-aparimanena punya-skandhena samanvagata bhavisyanti. Sarve te Subhute sattvah samamsena bodhim dharayisyanti. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi sakyam Subhute 'yam dharmaparyayo hina-adhimuktikaih sattvaih srotum na-atmadrstikair na sattvadrstikair na jiva-drstikair na pudgala-drstikaih. Na-abodhisattva-pratijnaih sattvaih sakyam ayam dharma-paryayah srotum vodgrahitum va dharayitum va vacayitum va paryavaptum va. Nedam sthanam vidyate.
Moreover, Subhuti,
(1) unthinkable and
(2) incomparable is this discourse on Dharma.
(3) The Tathagata has taught it for the weal of beings who have set out in the best, in the most excellent vehicle.
Those who will take up this discourse on Dharma, bear it in mind, recite, study and illuminate it in full detail for others, the Tathagata has known them with his Buddha-cognition, the Tathagata has seen them with his Buddha-eye, the Tathagata has fully known them. All these beings, Subhuti, will be blest with an immeasurable heap of merit, they will be blest with a heap of merit unthinkable, incomparable, measureless and illimitable. All these beings, Subhuti, will carry along an
equal share of enlightenment. And why? (4) Because it is not possible, Subhuti, that this discourse on Dharma could be heard by beings of inferior resolve, nor by such as have a self in view, a being, a soul, or a person. Nor can beings who have not taken the pledge of Bodhi-beings either hear this discourse on Dharma, or take it up, bear it in mind, recite or study it. That cannot be.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute yatra prthivipradesa idam sutram prakasayisyate, pujaniyah sa prthivipradeso bhavisyati sadeva-manusa-asurasya lokasya, vandaniyah pradaksiniyas ca sa prthivipradeso bhavisyati, caitya-bhutah sa prthivipradeso bhavisyati. Api tu ye te Subhute kulaputra va kuladuhitaro veman evamrupan sutrantan udgrahisyanti dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti yonisas ca manasikarisyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti te paribhuta bhavisyanti, suparibhutas ca bhavisyanti. Tat kasya hetoh? Yani ca tesam Subhute
sattvanam paurva-janmikany asubhani karmani krtany apayasamvartaniyani, drsta eva dharme taya paribhutatataya tani paurvajanmikany asubhani karmani ksapayisyanti, buddha-bodhim ca-anuprapsyanti. Tat kasya hetoh? Abhijanamy aham Subhute 'tite-dhvany asamkhyeyaih kalpair asamkhyeyatarair Dipankarasya Tathagatasyaarhatah samyaksambuddhasya parena para-tarena catur-asiti-buddha-koti-niyutasatasahasrany abhuvan ye maya aragita aragya na viragitah. Yac ca maya Subhute te Buddha Bhagavanta aragita aragya na viragita, yac ca pascime kale
pascime samaye pascimayam pancasatyam saddharma-vipralopa-kale vartamana iman evamrupan sutrantan udgrahisyanti dharayisyanti vacayisyanti paryavapsyanti parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayisyanti, asya khalu punah Subhute punyaskandhasya-antikad asau paurvakah punya-skandhah satatamim api kalam nopaiti, sahasratamim api satasahasratamim api, kotitamim api koti-satatamim api koti-satasahasratamim api koti-
niyuta-satasahasratamim api, samkhyam api kalam api gananam apy upamam apy upanisadam api yavad aupamyam api na ksamate. Sacet punah Subhute tesam kulaputranam kuladuhitrinam va-aham punyaskandham bhaseyam, yavat te kulaputra va kuladuhitaro va tasmin samaye punyaskandham prasavisyanti pratigrahisyanti, unmadam sattva anuprapnuyus citta-viksepam va gacheyuh. Api tu khalu punah Subhute 'cintyo 'yam dharmaparyayas Tathagatena bhasitah, asya-acintya eva vipakah pratikanksitavyah.
(1) Moreover, Subhuti, the spot of earth where this Sutra will be revealed, that spot of earth will be worthy of worship by the whole world with its Gods, men and Asuras, worthy of being saluted respectfully, worthy of being honoured by circumambulation, like a shrine will be that spot of earth. And yet Subhuti, those sons and daughters of good family, who
will take up these very Sutras, and will bear them in mind, recite and study them, they will be humbled, well humbled they will be! And why? The impure deeds which these beings have done in their former lives, and which are liable to lead them into the states of woe, in this very life they will, by means of that humiliation,
(2) annul those impure deeds of their former lives, and
(3) they will reach the enlightenment of a Buddha. With my superknowledge, Subhuti, I recall that in the past period, long before Dipankara, the Tathagata, Arhat, fully Enlightened One, during incalculable, quite incalculable aeons,
I gave satisfaction by loyal service to 84,000 million milliards of Buddhas, without ever becoming again estranged from them. But the heap of merit, Subhuti, from the satisfaction I gave to those Buddhas and Lords without again becoming estranged from them compared with the heap of merit of those who in the last time, the last epoch, the last five hundred years, at the time of the collapse of the good doctrine, will take up these very Sutras, bear them in mind, recite and study them, and will illuminate them in full detail for others, it does not approach one
hundredth part, not one thousandth part, nor a one hundred thousandth part, not a ten millionth part, nor a one hundred millionth part, nor a 100,000 millionth part. It does not bear number, nor fraction, nor counting, nor similarity, nor comparison, nor resemblance. (4) If moreover, Subhuti, I were to teach, the heap of merit of those sons and daughters of good family, and how great a heap of merit they will at that time beget and acquire, beings would become frantic and confused. Since, however, Subhuti, the Tathagata has taught this discourse on Dharma as unthinkable, so just an unthinkable karma result should be expected from it.
Atha khalv ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Katham Bhagavan bodhisattva-yanasamprasthitena sthatavyam, katham pratipattavyam, katham cittam pragrahitavyam? Bhagavan aha: Iha Subhute bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitenaivam cittam utpadayitavyam: Sarve sattva maya-anupadhisese nirvanadhatau parinirvapayitavyah. Evam ca sattvan parinirvapya, na kascit sattvah parinirvapito bhavati. Tat kasya hetoh? Sacet Subhute bodhisattvasya sattva-samjna pravarteta, na sa bodhisattva iti vaktavyah. Jiva-samjna va, yavat pudgalasamjna va pravarteta, na sa bodhisattva iti vaktavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Na-asti Subhute sa kascid dharmo yo bodhisattva-yana-samprasthito nama.
[(Subhuti asked: How, O Lord, should one set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle stand, how progress, how control his thoughts? The Lord replied: Here, Subhuti, someone who has set out in the Bodhisattva vehicle should produce a thought in this manner: 'all beings I must lead to Nirvana, into that Realm of Nirvana which leaves nothing behind; and yet, after beings have thus
been led to Nirvana, no being at all has been led to Nirvana'. And why? If in a Bodhisattva the notion of a 'being' should take place, he could not be called a 'Bodhi-being'. And likewise if the notion of a soul, or a person should take place in him.)] And why? He who has set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle he is not one of the dharmas.
Tat kim manyase Subhute asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena Dipankarasya Tathagatasyaantikad anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah? Evam ukta ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Yatha-aham Bhagavan Bhagavato bhasitasya-artham ajanami, naasti sa Bhagavan kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena Dipankarasya Tathagatasya-arhatah samyaksambuddhasya-antikad anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah. Evam ukte Bhagavan ayusmantam Subhutim etad avocat: Evam etat Subhute evam etat, na-asti Subhute sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena Dipankarasya Tathagatasya-
arhatah samyaksambuddhasyaantikad anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah. Sacet punah Subhute kascid dharmas Tathagatena-abhisambuddho'bhavisyat, na mam Dipankaras Tathagato vyakarisyad: Bhavisyasi tvam manava-anagate 'dhvani Sakyamunir nama Tathagato 'rhan samyaksambuddha iti. Yasmat tarhi Subhute Tathagatena-arhata samyaksambuddhena na-asti sa kascid dharmo yo 'nuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhas, tasmad aham Dipankarena Tathagatena vyakrto: Bhavisyasi tvam manava-anagate 'dhvani Sakyamunir nama Tathagato 'rhan samyaksambuddhah.
What do you think Subhuti, is there any dharma by which the Tathagata, when he was with Dipankara the Tathagata, has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment? Subhuti replied: There is not any dharma by which the Tathagata,
when he was with the Tathagata Dipankara, has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment. The Lord said: It is for this reason that the Tathagata Dipankara then predicted of me: 'You, young Brahmin, will be in a future period a Tathagata, Arhat, fully Enlightened, by the name of Shakyamuni!'
Tat kasya hetos? Tathagata iti Subhute bhuta-tathataya etad adhivacanam. Yah kascit Subhuta evam vadet: Tathagatena-arhatah samyaksambuddhena-anuttara samyaksambodhir abhisambuddheti, sa vitatham vadet, abhyacaksita mam sa Subhute asatodgrhitena. Tat kasya hetoh? Na-asti Subhute sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena-anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah. Yas ca Subhute Tathagatena dharmo 'bhisambuddho
desito va, tatra na satyam na mrsa. Tasmat Tathagato bhasate sarva-dharma Buddha-dharma iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Sarva-dharma iti a-dharmas Tathagatena bhasita. Tasmat ucyante sarva-dharma Buddha-dharma iti. Tad yatha-api nama Subhute puruso bhaved upetakayo mahakayah. Ayusman
Subhutir aha: Yo 'sau Bhagavams Tathagatena puruso bhasita upetakayo mahakaya iti, a-kayah sa Bhagavams Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyata upetakayo mahakaya iti.
And why? 'Tathagata', Subhuti, is synonymous with true Suchness (tathata). And whosoever, Subhuti, were to say, 'The Tathagata has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment', he would speak falsely. And why? [(There is not any dharma by which the Tathagata has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment. And that dharma which the Tathagata has fully known and demonstrated, on account of
that there is neither truth nor fraud.)] Therefore the Tathagata teaches, all dharmas are the Buddha's own and special dharmas'. And why? 'All-dharmas', Subhuti, have as no-dharmas been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore all
dharmas are called the Buddha's own and special dharmas. [(Just as a man, Subhuti, might be endowed with a body, a huge body.)] Subhuti said: That man of whom the Tathagata spoke as 'endowed with a body, a huge body', as a no-body he has been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is he called, 'endowed with a body, a huge body'.
Bhagavan aha: Evam etat Subhute. Yo bodhisattvo evam vaded: Aham sattvan parinirvapayisyanti-iti, na sa bodhisattva iti vaktavyah. Tat kasya hetoh, asti Subhute sa kascid dharmo yo bodhisattvo nama? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na-asti sa kascid dharmo yo bodhisattvo nama. Bhagavan aha: Sattvah sattva iti Subhute a-sattvas te Tathagatena bhasitas, tenocyante sattva iti. Tasmat Tathagato bhasate: Niratmanah sarvadharma nihsattvah nirjiva nispudgalah sarva-dharma iti. Yah Subhute bodhisattva evam vaded: Aham ksetra-vyuhan nispadayisyanti iti, so 'pi tathaiva vaktavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Ksetra-vyuha ksetra-vyuha iti Subhute 'vyuhas te Tathagatena bhasitah, tenocyante ksetravyuha iti. Yah Subhute bodhisattvo niratmano dharma niratmano dharma ity adhimucyate, sa Tathagatena-arhata samyaksambuddhena bodhisattvo mahasattva ity akhyatah.
The Lord said: So it is, Subhuti. The Bodhisattva who would say, I will lead beings to Nirvana', he should not be called a 'Bodhi-being'. And why? Is there, Subhuti, any dharma named 'Bodhi-being'? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. The Lord said: Because of that the Tathagata teaches, 'selfless are all dharmas, they have not the character of living beings, they are without a living soul, without personality'. [(If
any Bodhisattva should say, 'I will create harmonious Buddhafields')], he likewise should not be called a Bodhi-being. [(And why? 'The harmonies of Buddha fields, the harmonies of Buddhafields', Subhuti, as no-harmonies have they been taught by the
Tathagata. Therefore he spoke of 'harmonious Buddhafields'.)] The Bodhisattva, however, Subhuti, who is intent on 'without self are the dharmas, without self are the dharmas', he the Tathagata, the Arhat, the fully Enlightened One has declared to be a Bodhi-being, a great being. Bhagavan aha:
Tat kim manyase Subhute, samvidyate Tathagatasya mamsa-caksuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavan, samvidyate Tathagatasya mamsacaksuh. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, samvidyate Tathagatasya divyam caksuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavan, samvidyate Tathagatasya divyam caksuh. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, samvidyate Tathagatasya prajna-caksuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad
Bhagavan, samvidyate Tathagatasya prajna-caksuh. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, samvidyate Tathagatasya dharma-caksuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavan, samvidyate Tathagatasya dharma-caksuh. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, samvidyate Tathagatasya buddha-caksuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavan, samvidyate Tathagatasya buddha-caksuh.
What do you think, Subhuti, does the fleshly eye of the Tathagata exist? Subhuti replied: So it is, O Lord, the fleshly eye of the Tathagata does exist. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does the Tathagata's heavenly eye exist, his wisdom eye, his Dharma-eye, his Buddha-eye? Subhuti replied: So it is, O Lord, the heavenly eye of the Tathagata does exist, and so does his wisdom eye, his Dharma-eye and his Buddha-eye.
Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, yavantyo Gangayam maha-nadyam valuka, api nu ta valukas Tathagatena bhasitah? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavann, evam etat Sugata, bhasitas Tathagatena valukah. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute yavantyo Gangayam maha-nadyam valukas tavantya eva Ganga-nadyo bhaveyuh, tasu ya valukas tavantas ca lokadhatavo bhaveyuh, kascid bahavas te lokadhatavo
bhaveyuh? Subhutir aha: Evam etad Bhagavann, evam etat Sugata, bahavas te loka-dhatavo bhaveyuh. Bhagavan aha: Yavantah Subhute tesu loka-dhatusu sattvas tesam aham nanabhavam citta-dharam prajanami. Tat kasya hetoh? Citta-dhara citta-dhareti Subhute a-dharaisa Tathagatena bhasitas. Tenocyate cittadhareti. Tat kasya hetoh? Atitam Subhute cittam nopalabhyate, anagatam cittam nopalabhyate, pratyutpannam cittam nopalabhyate.
The Lord said: What do you think, Subhuti, has the Tathagata used the phrase, 'as many grains of sand as there are in the great river Ganges'? Subhuti replied: So it is, O Lord, so it is, O Well-Gone! The Tathagata has done so. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, if there were as many Ganges rivers as there are grains of sand in the great river Ganges, and if there were as many world systems as there are grains of sand in them, would those world systems be many? Subhuti replied: So it
is, O Lord, so it is, O Well-Gone, these world systems would be many. The Lord said: As many beings as there are in these world systems, of them I know, in my wisdom, the manifold trends of thought. And why? 'Trends of thought, trends of thought', Subhuti, as no trends have they been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore are they called 'trends of thought'. And why? Past thought is not got at; future thought is not got at; present thought is not got at.
Tat kim manyase Subhute yah kascit kulaputro va kuladuhita vemam trisahasramahasahasram lokadhatum sapta-ratna-paripurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, api nu sa kulaputro va kuladuhita va tato nidanam bahu punya-skandham prasunuyat? Subhutir aha: Bahu Bhagavan, bahu Sugata. Bhagavan aha: Evam etat Subhute evam etat, bahu sa kulaputro va kuladuhita va tato nidanam punyaskandham prasunuyad. Tat kasya hetoh? Punya-skandhah punya-skandha iti Subhute a-skandhah sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyate punya-skandha iti. Sacet Subhute punya-skandho'bhavisyan, na Tathagato'bhasisyat punya-skandhah punya-skandha iti.
What do you think, Subhuti, if a son or daughter of good family had filled this world system of 1,000 million worlds with the seven precious things, and then gave it as a gift to the Tathagatas, the Arhats, the fully Enlightened Ones, would they on the strength of that beget a great heap of merit? Subhuti replied: they would, O Lord, they would, O Well-Gone! The Lord said: So
it is, Subhuti, so it is. On the strength of that this son or daughter of good family would beget a great heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable. But if, on the other hand, there were such a thing as a heap of merit, the Tathagata would not have spoken of a 'heap of merit'.
Tat kim manyase Subhute rupa-kaya-parinispattya Tathagato drastavyah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na rupa-kaya-parinispattya Tathagato drastavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Rupakaya-parinispatti rupakaya-parinispattir iti Bhagavan a-parinispattir esa Tathagatena bhasita. Tenocyate rupakaya-parinispattir iti. Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, laksanasampada Tathagato drastavyah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Yaisa Bhagavaml laksana-sampat Tathagatena bhasita, a-laksana-sampad esa Tathagatena bhasita. Tenocyate laksana-sampad iti.
What do you think, Subhuti, is the Tathagata to be seen by means of the accomplishment of his form-body? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord, the Tathagata is not to be seen by means of the accomplishment of his form-body. And why? 'Accomplishment of his form-body, accomplishment of his form-body', this, O Lord, has been taught by the Tathagata as noaccomplishment.
Therefore is it called 'accomplishment of his form-body'. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, is the Tathagata to be seen through his possession of marks? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. And why? This possession of marks, O Lord, which has been taught by the Tathagata, as a no-possession of no-marks this has been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is it called 'possession of marks'.
Bhagavan aha: Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nu Tathagatasyaivam bhavati: Maya dharmo desita iti? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, na Tathagatasyaivam bhavati: Maya dharmo desita iti. Bhagavan aha: Yah Subhute evam vadet: Tathagatena dharmo desita iti, sa vitatham vadet, abhyacaksita mam sa Subhute 'satodgrhitena. Tat kasya hetoh? Dharma-desana dharma-desaneti Subhute, na-asti sa kascid dharmo yo dharma-desana namopalabhyate. The Lord asked: What do you think, Subhuti, does it occur to the Tathagata, 'by me has Dharma been demonstrated'? Whosoever, Subhuti, would say, 'the Tathagata has demonstrated Dharma', he would speak falsely, he would misrepresent me by seizing on what is not there. And why? 'Demonstration of dharma, demonstration of dharma', Subhuti, there is not any dharma which could be got at as a demonstration of dharma.
Evam ukta ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Asti Bhagavan kecit sattva bhavisyanty anagate 'dhvani pascime kale pascime samaye pascimayam panca-satyam saddharma-vipralope vartamane ya iman evamrupan dharman srutva-abhisraddadhasyanti? Bhagavan aha: Na te Subhute sattva na-a-sattvah. Tat kasya hetoh? Sattvah sattva iti Subhute sarve te Subhute a-sattvas Tathagatena bhasitah tenocyante sattva iti.
Subhuti asked: Are there, O Lord, any beings in the future, in the last time, in the last epoch, in the last 500 years, at the time of the collapse of the good doctrine who, on hearing such dharmas, will truly believe? The Lord replied: They, Subhuti, are neither beings nor nobeings. And why? 'Beings, beings', Subhuti, the Tathagata has taught that they are all nobeings. Therefore has he spoken of 'all beings'.
Tat kim manyase Subhute, api nv asti sa kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena-anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah? Ayusman Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan na-asti sa Bhagavan kascid dharmo yas Tathagatena-anuttaram samyaksambodhim abhisambuddhah. Bhagavan aha: Evam etat Subhute evam etat, anur api tatra dharmo na samvidyate nopalabhyate. Tenocyate 'nuttara samyaksambodhir iti. Api tu khalu punah
Subhute samah sa dharmo na tatra kimcid visamam. Tenocyate 'nuttara samyaksambodhir iti. Niratmatvena nihsattvatvena nirjivatvena nispudgalatvena sama sanuttara samyaksambodhih sarvaih kusalair dharmair abhisambudhyate. Tat kasya hetoh? Kusala dharmah kusala dharma iti Subhute a-dharmas caiva te Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyante kusala dharma iti.
What do you think, Subhuti, is there any dharma by which the Tathagata has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord, there is not any dharma by which the Tathagata has fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment. The Lord said: So it is, Subhuti, so it is. Not even the least (anu) dharma is there found or got at. Therefore is it called 'utmost (anuttara), right and perfect enlightenment'. Furthermore, Subhuti, self-identical
(sama) is that dharma, and nothing is therein at variance (vishama). Therefore is it called 'utmost, right (samyak) and perfect (sam-) enlightenment'. Self-identical through the absence of a self, a being, a soul, or a person, the
utmost, right and perfect enlightenment is fully known as the totality of all the wholesome dharmas. 'Wholesome dharmas, wholesome dharmas', Subhuti yet as no-dharmas have they been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore are they called 'wholesome dharmas'.
Yas ca khalu punah Subhute stri va puruso va yavantas trisahasramahasahasre lokadhatau Sumeravah parvata-rajanas tavato rasin saptanam ratnanam abhisamhrtya Tathagatebhyo'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, yas ca kulaputro va kuladuhita vetah prajnaparamitaya dharma-paryayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham udgrhya parebhyo desayed, asya Subhute punyaskandhasya-asau paurvakah punyaskandhah satatamim api kalam nopaiti yavad upanisadam api na ksamate.
And again, Subhuti, if a woman or man had piled up the seven precious things until their bulk equaled that of all the Sumerus, kings of mountains, in the world system of 1,000 million worlds, and would give them as a gift; and if, on the other hand, a son or daughter of good family would take up from this Prajnaparamita, this discourse on Dharma, but one stanza of four lines, and demonstrate it to others, compared with his heap of merit the former heap of merit does not approach one hundredth part, etc., until we come to, it will not bear any comparison.
Tat kim manyase Subhute api nu Tathagatasyaivam bhavati: Maya sattvah parimocita iti? Na khalu punah Subhute evam drastavyam. Tata kasya hetoh? Na-asti Subhute kascit sattvo yas Tathagatena parimocitah. Yadi punah Subhute kascit sattvo' bhavisyat yas Tathagatena parimocitah syat, sa eva Tathagatasya-atma-graho'bhavisyat, sattva-graho jiva-grahah pudgala-graho 'bhavisyat. Atma-graha iti Subhute agraha esa Tathagatena bhasitah. Sa ca balaprthag-janair udgrhitah. Balaprthag-jana iti Subhute a-jana eva te Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyante balaprthagjana iti.
What do you think, Subhuti, does it occur to a Tathagata, 'by me have beings been set free'? Not thus should you see it, Subhuti! And why? There is not any being whom the Tathagata has set free. Again, if there had been any being whom the Tathagata had set free, then surely there would have been on the part of the Tathagata a seizing of a self, of a being, of a soul, of a
person. 'Seizing of a self', as a no-seizing, Subhuti, has that been taught by the Tathagata. And yet the foolish common people have seized upon it. 'Foolish common people', Subhuti, as really no people have they been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore are they called 'foolish common people'.
Tat kim manyase Subhute, laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah? Subhutir aha: No hidam Bhagavan, yatha-aham Bhagavato bhasitasya-artham ajanami na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Bhagavan aha: Sadhu sadhu Subhute, evam etat Subhute evam etad, yatha vadasi: Na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Tat kasya hetoh? Sacet punah Subhute laksanasampada Tathagato drastavyo 'bhavisyad, raja-api cakravarti Tathagato'bhavisyat. Tasman na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Ayusman Subhutir Bhagavantam etad avocat: Yathaaham Bhagavato bhasitasya-artham ajanami, na laksana-sampada Tathagato drastavyah. Atha khalu Bhagavams tasyam velayam ime gathe abhasata:
What do you think, Subhuti, is the Tathagata to be seen by means of his possession of marks? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord. The Lord said: If, Subhuti, the Tathagata could be recognized by his possession of marks, then also the universal monarch would be a Tathagata. Therefore the Tathagata is not to be seen by means of his possession of marks. Subhuti then said: As I, O Lord, understand the Lord's teaching, the Tathagata is not to be seen through his possession of marks. Further the Lord taught on that occasion the following stanzas:
Ye mam rupena ca-adraksur Ye mam ghosena ca-anvayuh Mithya-prahana-prasrta Na mam draksyanti te janah
Those who by my form did see me, And those who followed me by voice Wrong the efforts they engaged in, Me those people will not see.
Dharmato Buddha drastavya Dharmakaya hi nayakah Dharmata ca na vijneya Na sa sakya vijanitum.
From the Dharma should one see the Buddhas, From the Dharmabodies comes their guidance. Yet Dharma's true nature cannot be discerned, And no one can be conscious of it as an object.
Tat kim manyase Subhute laksana-sampada Tathagatena-anuttara samyaksambodhir abhisambuddha? Na khalu punas te Subhute evam drastavyam. Tat kasya hetoh? Na hi Subhute laksana-sampada Tathagatena-anuttara samyaksambodhir abhisambuddha syat.
What do you think, Subhuti, has the Tathagata fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment through his possession of marks? Not so should you see it, Subhuti. And why? Because the Tathagata could surely not have fully known the utmost, right and perfect enlightenment through his possession of marks.
Na khalu punas te Subhute kascid evam vaded: Bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitaih kasyacid dharmasya vinasah prajnapta ucchedo veti. Na khalu punas te Subhute evam drastavyam. Tat kasya hetoh? Na bodhisattva-yana-samprasthitaih kasyacid dharmasya vinasah prajnapto nocchedah.
Nor should anyone, Subhuti, say to you, 'those who have set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle have conceived the destruction of a dharma, or its annihilation'. Not so should you see it, Subhuti! For those who have set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle have not conceived the destruction of a dharma, or its annihilation.
Yas ca khalu punah Subhute kulaputro va kuladuhita va ganganadi-valuka-samaml lokadhatun saptaratna-paripurnan krtva Tathagatebhyo'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, yas ca bodhisattvo niratmakesv anutpatti-kesu dharmesu ksantim pratilabhate, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punya-skandham prasaved aprameyam asamkhyeyam.
And again, Subhuti, if a son or daughter of good family had filled with the seven precious things as many world systems as there are grains of sand in the river Ganges, and gave them as a gift to the Tathagatas, Arhats, fully Enlightened Ones, and if on the other hand a Bodhisattva would gain the patient acquiescence in dharmas which are nothing of themselves and which fail to be produced, then this latter would on the strength of that beget a greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable.
Na khalu punah Subhute bodhisattvena mahasattvena punya-skandhah parigrahitavyah. Ayusman Subhutir aha: Nanu Bhagavan bodhisattvena punyaskandhah parigrahitavyah? Bhagavan aha: Parigrahitavyah Subhute nodgrahitavyah. Tenocyate parigrahitavya iti.
Moreover, Subhuti, the Bodhisattva should not acquire a heap of merit. Subhuti said: Surely, O Lord, the Bodhisattva should acquire a heap of merit? The Lord said: 'Should acquire', Subhuti, not 'should seize upon.' Therefore is it said, 'should acquire'.
Api tu khalu punah Subhute yah kascid evam vadet: Tathagato gacchati vagacchati va, tisthati va nisidati va sayyam va kalpayati, na me Subhute sa bhasitasya-artham ajanati. Tat kasya hetoh? Tathagata iti Subhute ucyate na kvacid-gato na kutascid agatah. Tenocyate Tathagato 'rhan samyaksambuddha iti.
Whosoever says that the Tathagata goes or comes, stands, sits or lies down, he does not understand the meaning of my teaching. And why? 'Tathagata' is called one who has not gone anywhere, nor come from anywhere. Therefore is he called 'the Tathagata, the Arhat, the fully Enlightened One'.
Yas ca khalu punah Subhute kulaputro va kuladuhita va yavantas trisahasra-mahasahasre lokadhatau prthivi-rajamsi tavatam lokadhatunam evamrupam masim kuryat yavad evam asamkhyeyena viryena tad yathapi nama paramanu-samcayah, tat kim manyase Subhute api nu bahuh sa paramanu-samcayo bhavet? Subhutir aha: Evam etat Bhagavann, evam etat Sugata, bahuh sa paramanu-samcayo bhavet. Tat kasya hetoh? Saced Bhagavan bahuh paramanu-samcayo 'bhavisyat, na Bhagavan avaksyat paramanu-samcaya iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Yo 'sau Bhagavan paramanu-samcayas Tathagatena bhasitah, a-samcayah sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyate paramanu-samcaya iti.
And again, Subhuti, if a son or daughter of good family were to grind as many world systems as there are particles of dust in this great world system of 1,000 million worlds, as finely as they can be ground with incalculable vigour, and in fact reduce them to something like a collection of atomic quantities, what do you think, Subhuti, would that be an enormous
collection of atomic quantities? Subhuti replied: So it is, O Lord, so it is, O Well-Gone, enormous would that collection of atomic quantities be! And why? If, O Lord, there had been an enormous collection of atomic quantities, the Lord would not have called it an 'enormous collection of atomic quantities'. And why? What was taught by the Tathagata as a 'collection of atomic quantities', as a no-collection that was taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is it called a 'collection of atomic quantities'.
Yas ca Tathagatena bhasitas trisahasramahasahasro lokadhatur iti, a-dhatuh sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyate trisahasramahasahasro lokadhatur iti. Tat kasya hetoh? Saced Bhagavan loka-dhatur abhavisyat, sa eva pinda-graho 'bhavisyat, yas caiva pinda-grahas Tathagatena bhasitah, a-grahah sa Tathagatena bhasitah. Tenocyate pinda-graha iti. Bhagavan aha: Pindagrahas caiva Subhute 'vyavaharo 'nabhilapyah. Na sa dharmo na-adharmah, sa ca balaprthagjanair udgrhitah.
And what the Tathagata taught as 'the world system of 1,000 million worlds', that he has taught as a no-system. Therefore is it called 'the world system of 1,000 million worlds'. And why? If, O Lord, there had been a world system, that would have been a case of seizing on a material object, and what was taught as 'seizing on a material object' by the Tathagata, just as a no-
seizing was that taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is it called 'seizing on a material object'. The Lord added: And also, Subhuti, that 'seizing on a material object' is a matter of linguistic convention, a verbal expression without factual content. It is not a dharma nor a nodharma. And yet the foolish common people have seized upon it.
Tat kasya hetoh? Yo hi kascit Subhuta evam vaded: Atma-drstis Tathagatena bhasita sattvadrstir jiva-drstih pudgala-drstis Tathagatena bhasita, api nu sa Subhute samyagvadamano vadet? Subhuti aha: No hidam Bhagavan no hidam Sugata, na samyag-vadamano vadet. Tat kasya hetoh? Ya sa Bhagavann atma-drstis Tathagatena bhasita, a-drstih sa Tathagatena bhasita. Tenocyata atma-drstir iti. Bhagavan aha: Evam hi Subhute bodhisattva-yanasamprasthitena sarva-dharma jnatavya drastavya adhimoktavyah. Tatha ca jnatavya drastavya adhimoktavyah yatha na dharma-samjna pratyupasthahe. Tat kasya hetoh? Dharma-samjna dharma-samjneti Subhute a-samjnaisa Tathagatena bhasita. Tenocyate dharma-samjneti.
And why? Because whosoever would say that the view of a self has been taught by the Tathagata, the view of a being, the view of a living soul, the view of a person, would he, Subhuti, be speaking right? Subhuti replied: No indeed, O Lord, no indeed, O Well-Gone, he would not be speaking right. And why? That which has been taught by the Tathagata as 'view of
self', as a no-view has that been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is it called 'view of self'. The Lord said: It is thus, Subhuti, that someone who has set out in the Bodhisattva-vehicle should know all dharmas, view them, be intent on them. And he should know, view and be intent on them in such a way that he does not set up the perception of a dharma. And why? 'Perception of dharma, perception of dharma, 'Subhuti, as no-perception has this been taught by the Tathagata. Therefore is it called 'perception of dharma'.
Yas ca khalu punah Subhute bodhisattva mahasattvo 'prameyan asamkhyeyaml lokadhatun saptaratna-paripurnam krtva Tathagatebhyo 'rhadbhyah samyaksambuddhebhyo danam dadyat, yas ca kulaputro va kuladuhita vetah prajnapara-mitaya dharmaparyayad antasas catuspadikam api gatham udgrhya dharayed desayed vacayet paryavapnuyat parebhyas ca vistarena samprakasayed, ayam eva tato nidanam bahutaram punyaskandham prasunuyad aprameyam asamkhyeyam. Katham ca samprakasayet? Yatha na prakasayet. Tenocyate samprakasayed iti.
And finally, Subhuti, if a Bodhisattva, a great being had filled world-systems immeasurable and incalculable with the seven precious things, and gave them as a gift to the Tathagatas, the Arhats, the fully Enlightened Ones, and if, on the other hand, a son or daughter of good family had taken from this Prajnaparamita, this discourse on Dharma, but one stanza
of four lines, and were to bear it in mind, demonstrate, recite and study it, and illuminate it in full detail for others, on the strength of that this latter would beget a greater heap of merit, immeasurable and incalculable. And how would he illuminate it? So as not to reveal. Therefore is it said, 'he would illuminate'.
Taraka timiram dipo Maya-avasyaya budbudam Supinam vidyud abhram ca Evam drastavyam samskrtam. As stars, a fault of vision, as a lamp, A mock show, dew drops, or a bubble, A dream, a lightning flash, or cloud, So should one view what is conditioned. Idam avocad Bhagavan. Attamanah sthavira Subhutis, te ca bhiksu-bhiksuny-upasakopasikas te ca bodhisattvah sa-deva-manusa-asura-gandharvas ca loko Bhagavato bhasitam abhyanandann iti. Arya-Vajracchedika Bhagavati Prajnaparamita samapta.
Thus spoke the Lord. Enraptured, the Elder Subhuti, the monks and nuns, the pious laymen and laywomen, and the Bodhisattvas, and the whole world with its Gods, men, Asuras and Gandharvas rejoiced in the Lord's teaching. This completes the Diamond-Cutter of Perfect Wisdom. Aus: Conze, E.: Buddhist wisdom books; the Diamond and the Heart Sutra. London 1988 (4e)
