Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ḍ Ḥ Ī Ḷ Ṃ Ṇ Ñ Ṅ Ṛ Ṣ Ś Ṭ Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Nirvana Sutra: Chapter Eleven: On the Four Inversions

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:06, 11 July 2024 by VTao (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
160bn000.jpg
325826 n.jpg





Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra
Translated by KOSHO YAMAMOTO

FROM Dharmakshema's Chinese version

The World's genuinely first-ever web edition of this complete scripture

(This "Yamamoto/page edition" is Copyright of Dr. Tony Page, 2004 )
The Complete Kosho Yamamoto English Translation of the "Nirvana Sutra", edited and revised by Dr. Tony Page, typographically improved by Jay and Gabriele Mazo


Chapter Eleven: On the Four Inversions

“The Buddha said to Kasyapa: "We speak of the "four inversions". "Inversion" is spoken of when we entertain the idea of suffering where there is no suffering. "Non-suffering" is the Tathagata. The idea of suffering arises when a person thinks that all Tathagatas are non-eternal and that they change. If a person says that the Tathagata changes, this is (the concept of) suffering and constitutes a great sin. If a person says that the Tathagata relinquishes this body of suffering and enters Nirvana, and that this is like fuel being all burned up, as a result of which the fire dies out, this is having the idea of suffering vis-ã-vis non-suffering. This is an inversion (of the truth). A person might say: "Saying that the Tathagata is Eternal is a Self-centred view. From this Self-centred view arise innumerable sins. Thus,

one should say that the Tathagata is non-Eternal, and by (saying) this I shall gain Bliss." The Tathagata's being non-Eternal would entail suffering. If (there is) suffering, how could one expect (to find) Bliss therein? When the idea of Bliss occurs (in such a connection), we say "inversion". This is said because the thought of suffering arises in (what truly is) Bliss. Bliss is the Tathagata. Suffering is the non-Eternal of the Tathagata. If a person says that the Tathagata is non-Eternal, this is a thought of suffering in Bliss. The Tathagata's being Eternal is Bliss. If I say that the Tathagata is Eternal, how can I enter Nirvana? If I say that the Tathagata is non-suffering, how could I cast away my body and enter Nirvana? When a person has the thought of suffering in Bliss, we say that this is an inversion. This is the first inversion.

"The idea of the Eternal vis-ã-vis the non-Eternal, and the idea of the non-Eternal vis-ã-vis the Eternal, are inversions. The non-Eternal is the non-practising of the Void. When one does not practise the Void, life is shortened. If one says: "Not practising the Void and quietude, one attains eternal life", this is an inversion. This is the second inversion.

"The thought of Self regarding non-Self, and the thought of non-Self regarding Self, are inversions. The people of the world say that there is Self, and within Buddhism, too, we say that there is Self. The people of the world say that there is Self, but there is no Buddha-Nature. This is having the idea of Self in (what is) non-Self. This is an inversion. “The Self spoken of in Buddhism is the Buddha-Nature.” The people of the world say that there is no Self in Buddhism. This is

the idea of the non-Self in the Self. "It is definite that there is no Self in the Buddhist teaching. That is why the Tathagata tells his disciples to practise selflessness." If such is said, this is an inversion. This is the third inversion.

"The non-Pure in the Pure, and the Pure in the non-Pure, are inversions. The Pure relates to the Eternal of the Tathagata. It is not a food-supported body, not a body of illusion. It is not a carnal body, not a body made up of sinews and bones. If one says that the Tathagata is non-Eternal, a food-supported body, bound together by sinews and bones, and that Dharma, Sangha, and emancipation die out, this is an inversion. We say that the idea of the non-Pure in the Pure is an inversion. A person

might say that there is not a whit of what is non-Pure in his mind, that as there is not a single thing that is not Pure, he gets into a place which is Pure, and that as the person practises the meditation of the non-Pure which the Tathagata spoke about, whatever was said above must be false. If a person speaks thus, this is an inversion. This is the fourth inversion."

Bodhisattva Kasyapa said to the Buddha: "O World-Honoured One! I have now for the first time gained the right view. O World-Honoured One! Until now, all of us were those who abided in wrong thought."


Source

nirvanasutra.net

Continue Reading

Retrieved from "http://www.tibetanbuddhistencyclopedia.com/en/index.php?title=Nirvana_Sutra:_Chapter_Eleven:_On_the_Four_Inversions&oldid=331710"