Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Buddhist Values and Globalization by Hema Goonatilake"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision: Robo text replace 30 sept)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
====Introduction====
 
====Introduction====
 
[[File:Meditation-graphic.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Meditation-graphic.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
The [[aim]] of this paper is to examine the extent to which [[Buddhist]] values and [[ideas]] could be realised in the face of globalization. Let me begin with a personal note. I come from [[Sri Lanka]] which in the first millennium was at the crossroads of the then globalisation. This is indicated by the majority group of {{Wiki|Sinhalese}} having the largest genetic diversity in the country compared to other {{Wiki|ethnic}} groups - over the centuries there had been genetic mixing from various parts of the [[world]]. The then {{Wiki|Sinhalese}}, almost exclusively [[Buddhist]], travelled to the then far corners of the [[world]] as revealed by records in {{Wiki|Rome}}, [[China]], {{Wiki|Southeast Asia}} and the lands in between. [[Buddhism]] itself was carried through travel and the then incipient globalisation to {{Wiki|East Asia}} and {{Wiki|West}} {{Wiki|Asia}} and possibly even further afield. So, [[Buddhism]] was in the forefront of the global travel of [[ideas]]. [[Buddhists]] should not, therefore, be afraid of the global as it is in their "genes" as it were.
 
  
{{Wiki|Capital}}, technology, [[knowledge]] and to a [[lesser]] extent, labour had become much more mobile in today's globalised [[order]]. Globalisation in {{Wiki|culture}} today is brought about by [[people]] sharing their [[thoughts]], [[actions]], [[ideas]], in short, their {{Wiki|culture}}, across vast distances. This is through mass tourism, migrant workers and refugees. [[Penetration]] of trade, financial links, travel and telecommunications {{Wiki|increase}} this shared [[universe]]. Globalisation cuts both ways for [[Buddhists]]. Globalisation has helped Asian countries almost all having the imprint of [[Buddhism]] if not now during their {{Wiki|history}} to become rising economic [[powers]]. Globalisation has also resulted in the spread of [[Buddhist practices]] like [[meditation]] to all parts of the [[world]] and seems to be following the spread of [[yoga]] practices in earlier decades to become in the future almost a household Western practice. International exchange of [[Buddhist]] [[scholars]] and practitioners has facilitated the spread of [[Buddhist]] [[ideas]] across the globe.
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The [[aim]] of this paper is to examine the extent to which [[Buddhist]] values and [[ideas]] could be realised in the face of globalization. Let me begin with a personal note. I come from [[Sri Lanka]] which in the first millennium was at the crossroads of the then globalisation. This is indicated by the majority group of {{Wiki|Sinhalese}} having the largest {{Wiki|genetic}} diversity in the country compared to other {{Wiki|ethnic}} groups - over the centuries there had been {{Wiki|genetic}} mixing from various parts of the [[world]]. The then {{Wiki|Sinhalese}}, almost exclusively [[Buddhist]], travelled to the then far corners of the [[world]] as revealed by records in {{Wiki|Rome}}, [[China]], {{Wiki|Southeast Asia}} and the lands in between. [[Buddhism]] itself was carried through travel and the then incipient globalisation to {{Wiki|East Asia}} and {{Wiki|West}} {{Wiki|Asia}} and possibly even further afield. So, [[Buddhism]] was in the forefront of the global travel of [[ideas]]. [[Buddhists]] should not, therefore, be afraid of the global as it is in their "{{Wiki|genes}}" as it were.
 +
 
 +
{{Wiki|Capital}}, technology, [[knowledge]] and to a [[lesser]] extent, labour had become much more mobile in today's globalised [[order]]. Globalisation in {{Wiki|culture}} today is brought about by [[people]] sharing their [[thoughts]], [[actions]], [[ideas]], in short, their {{Wiki|culture}}, across vast distances. This is through {{Wiki|mass}} tourism, migrant workers and refugees. [[Penetration]] of trade, financial links, travel and telecommunications {{Wiki|increase}} this shared [[universe]]. Globalisation cuts both ways for [[Buddhists]]. Globalisation has helped {{Wiki|Asian}} countries almost all having the imprint of [[Buddhism]] if not now during their {{Wiki|history}} to become [[rising]] economic [[powers]]. Globalisation has also resulted in the spread of [[Buddhist practices]] like [[meditation]] to all parts of the [[world]] and seems to be following the spread of [[yoga]] practices in earlier decades to become in the {{Wiki|future}} almost a household [[Western]] practice. International exchange of [[Buddhist]] [[scholars]] and practitioners has facilitated the spread of [[Buddhist]] [[ideas]] across the {{Wiki|globe}}.
  
 
====Adverse Aspects of Globalisation====
 
====Adverse Aspects of Globalisation====
  
The crisis brought about by the negative aspects of globalization has resulted in droughts, floods, economic dislocation, {{Wiki|internal}} conflict, debt, poverty and {{Wiki|social}} inequalities in the contemporary [[world]]. This has led to unrest among the poor classes. The middle and upper classes are in the process of waking up to the {{Wiki|real}} situation as their economies are failing. There is now an opportunity for [[people]] to develop a true critical [[self]] [[awareness]] of the negative {{Wiki|features}} of globalization and take serious note of the solution which the [[Buddha]] had made known to the [[world]] many centuries ago. [[Buddha's teachings]] are needed more than ever in this age of globalisation.
+
The crisis brought about by the negative aspects of globalization has resulted in droughts, floods, economic dislocation, {{Wiki|internal}} conflict, debt, {{Wiki|poverty}} and {{Wiki|social}} inequalities in the contemporary [[world]]. This has led to unrest among the poor classes. The middle and upper classes are in the process of waking up to the {{Wiki|real}} situation as their economies are failing. There is now an opportunity for [[people]] to develop a true critical [[self]] [[awareness]] of the negative {{Wiki|features}} of globalization and take serious note of the {{Wiki|solution}} which the [[Buddha]] had made known to the [[world]] many centuries ago. [[Buddha's teachings]] are needed more than ever in this age of globalisation.
  
Economic globalization without values developed with the underlying assumption that globalization brings jobs, technology, income and [[wealth]] to {{Wiki|societies}} with new [[conditions]] that these {{Wiki|societies}} were willing to submit to the {{Wiki|principles}} of the free market, privatizing public services etc. This has resulted in poverty and powerlessness of the majority of [[people]], the [[destruction]] of community, depletion of natural resources and devastating environmental effects. Let us review some of the negative aspects.
+
Economic globalization without values developed with the underlying assumption that globalization brings jobs, technology, income and [[wealth]] to {{Wiki|societies}} with new [[conditions]] that these {{Wiki|societies}} were willing to submit to the {{Wiki|principles}} of the free market, privatizing public services etc. This has resulted in {{Wiki|poverty}} and powerlessness of the majority of [[people]], the [[destruction]] of {{Wiki|community}}, depletion of natural resources and devastating {{Wiki|environmental}} effects. Let us review some of the negative aspects.
  
According to the Worldwatch Institute, more goods and services were consumed in the forty years between 1950 and 1990 (measured in [[constant]] dollars) than by all the previous generations in [[human]] {{Wiki|history}}. According to the United Nations [[Human]] Development Report for 1999, a child in the developed countries consumes and pollutes 30 to 50 times as much as a poor one in an undeveloped country. Today 1.2 billion [[people]] survive on less than a dollar a day, and almost half the world's population [[live]] on less than two dollars a day. The 20% of [[people]] in the richest countries enjoy 86% of the world's consumption, the poorest 20% only 1.3%. [[Thus]], globalization has increased the gap between the rich and the poor. The rise of new [[awareness]] in the {{Wiki|West}} and also the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} could with correct [[ideas]] and attitudes change this situation.
+
According to the Worldwatch Institute, more goods and services were consumed in the forty years between 1950 and 1990 (measured in [[constant]] dollars) than by all the previous generations in [[human]] {{Wiki|history}}. According to the United Nations [[Human]] [[Development]] Report for 1999, a child in the developed countries consumes and pollutes 30 to 50 times as much as a poor one in an undeveloped country. Today 1.2 billion [[people]] survive on less than a dollar a day, and almost half the world's population [[live]] on less than two dollars a day. The 20% of [[people]] in the richest countries enjoy 86% of the world's consumption, the poorest 20% only 1.3%. [[Thus]], globalization has increased the gap between the rich and the poor. The rise of new [[awareness]] in the {{Wiki|West}} and also the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} could with correct [[ideas]] and attitudes change this situation.
 
[[File:-008.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:-008.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
The current spate of globalisation has also brought about a homogenization of {{Wiki|culture}} through a variety of {{Wiki|social}} and {{Wiki|cultural}} developments. According to the same UNHDR report, the [[world]] spent at least $435 billion in the previous year for advertising, plus well over $100 billion for public relations and marketing. The result is 270 million "global teens", who now inhabit a single pop-culture [[world]], consuming the same designer [[clothes]], {{Wiki|music}}, mostly [[emerging]] from the {{Wiki|West}}. This new corporate {{Wiki|culture}} has destroyed the local cultures and [[traditional]] ways of living that have evolved over thousands of years and [[appropriate]] to their local [[conditions]] and environment. As a result, {{Wiki|social}} relationships too have disrupted. But it seems the {{Wiki|movement}} is in the {{Wiki|opposite}} [[direction]] with increasingly global trends [[being]] set in {{Wiki|Asia}} and the non-West - again a product of globalisation.
+
The current spate of globalisation has also brought about a homogenization of {{Wiki|culture}} through a variety of {{Wiki|social}} and {{Wiki|cultural}} developments. According to the same UNHDR report, the [[world]] spent at least $435 billion in the previous year for advertising, plus well over $100 billion for public relations and marketing. The result is 270 million "global teens", who now inhabit a single pop-culture [[world]], consuming the same designer [[clothes]], {{Wiki|music}}, mostly [[emerging]] from the {{Wiki|West}}. This new corporate {{Wiki|culture}} has destroyed the local cultures and [[traditional]] ways of living that have evolved over thousands of years and [[appropriate]] to their local [[conditions]] and {{Wiki|environment}}. As a result, {{Wiki|social}} relationships too have disrupted. But it seems the {{Wiki|movement}} is in the {{Wiki|opposite}} [[direction]] with increasingly global trends [[being]] set in {{Wiki|Asia}} and the non-West - again a product of globalisation.
  
 
====The collapse of the [[empire]] of globalization====
 
====The collapse of the [[empire]] of globalization====
  
In mid-2011, the Canadian-based group, Adbusters Media Foundation, known for its advertisement-free anti-consumerist magazine, Adbusters initiated a [[peaceful]] occupation of Wall Street to protest against a growing disparity in [[wealth]], and the absence of legal repercussions behind the recent global crisis. Their slogan "We are the 99%" refers to the [[concentration]] of [[wealth]] among the top 1% of income earners which had nearly tripled over the last thirty years. Prior to that, Occupy Dataran {{Wiki|movement}} had begun on July 30, 2011, and by October 9, Occupy protests were ongoing in over 95 cities across 82 countries and in over 600 communities in the US. This was a {{Wiki|reflection}} of the spread of neo-liberalism (combined with the push from neocons and theocons of the Bible belt in the USA). It was also a partial {{Wiki|reflection}} of the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} through which as a result of globalisation, jobs from the {{Wiki|West}} were [[being]] sucked into {{Wiki|Asia}}. The current economic travails had not affected {{Wiki|Asia}} that much.
+
In mid-2011, the Canadian-based group, Adbusters Media Foundation, known for its advertisement-free anti-consumerist magazine, Adbusters [[initiated]] a [[peaceful]] {{Wiki|occupation}} of {{Wiki|Wall Street}} to protest against a growing disparity in [[wealth]], and the absence of legal repercussions behind the recent global crisis. Their slogan "We are the 99%" refers to the [[concentration]] of [[wealth]] among the top 1% of income earners which had nearly tripled over the last thirty years. Prior to that, Occupy Dataran {{Wiki|movement}} had begun on July 30, 2011, and by October 9, Occupy protests were ongoing in over 95 cities across 82 countries and in over 600 communities in the US. This was a {{Wiki|reflection}} of the spread of neo-liberalism (combined with the push from neocons and theocons of the Bible belt in the {{Wiki|USA}}). It was also a partial {{Wiki|reflection}} of the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} through which as a result of globalisation, jobs from the {{Wiki|West}} were [[being]] sucked into {{Wiki|Asia}}. The current economic travails had not affected {{Wiki|Asia}} that much.
  
[[Bhikkhu]] Bodhi's statement endorsing his support to the non-violent occupation of Washington, DC, describes the problem as well as the solution as follows:
+
[[Bhikkhu]] Bodhi's statement endorsing his support to the non-violent {{Wiki|occupation}} of [[Washington]], DC, describes the problem as well as the {{Wiki|solution}} as follows:
  
 
We [[live]] at a [[time]] when [[perpetual]] warfare, the crackdown on civil liberties, economic and {{Wiki|social}} injustices, and most ominously, the desecration of the {{Wiki|biosphere}}, are threatening [[human]] {{Wiki|civilization}}. We now stand at a crossroads presenting us with a simple choice: either we make major changes in our {{Wiki|social}} and economic policies to ensure [[human]] flourishing on [[earth]], or we carry on with "business as usual" despite the prospects of unprecedented catastrophe. I want to participate to show that I favor choosing the former alternative.
 
We [[live]] at a [[time]] when [[perpetual]] warfare, the crackdown on civil liberties, economic and {{Wiki|social}} injustices, and most ominously, the desecration of the {{Wiki|biosphere}}, are threatening [[human]] {{Wiki|civilization}}. We now stand at a crossroads presenting us with a simple choice: either we make major changes in our {{Wiki|social}} and economic policies to ensure [[human]] flourishing on [[earth]], or we carry on with "business as usual" despite the prospects of unprecedented catastrophe. I want to participate to show that I favor choosing the former alternative.
Line 27: Line 36:
 
====The [[Buddha’s]] [[attitude]] to [[wealth]], investment and saving====
 
====The [[Buddha’s]] [[attitude]] to [[wealth]], investment and saving====
 
[[File:00,0.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:00,0.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
The [[Buddha]] did not despise [[wealth]] and the wealthy. [[Anathapindika]] and [[Visakha]], his closest supporters were among the wealthiest. While he guided the [[people]] to attain the [[ultimate truth]], he encouraged [[lay people]] to accumulate [[wealth]], but through righteous means. [[Happiness]] that [[wealth]] brings was classified as, the [[happiness]] of having [[wealth]], the [[happiness]] of consuming [[wealth]], the [[happiness]] of freedom from debt and the [[happiness]] of [[being]] [[blameless]] in conduct. He advised Sigala, going into detail about consuming, investing and saving, for example, consume one-fourth, invest two­-fourths and save one-fourth.
+
The [[Buddha]] did not despise [[wealth]] and the wealthy. [[Anathapindika]] and [[Visakha]], his closest supporters were among the wealthiest. While he guided the [[people]] to attain the [[ultimate truth]], he encouraged [[lay people]] to [[accumulate]] [[wealth]], but through righteous means. [[Happiness]] that [[wealth]] brings was classified as, the [[happiness]] of having [[wealth]], the [[happiness]] of consuming [[wealth]], the [[happiness]] of freedom from debt and the [[happiness]] of [[being]] [[blameless]] in conduct. He advised Sigala, going into detail about consuming, investing and saving, for example, consume one-fourth, invest two­-fourths and save one-fourth.
  
A {{Wiki|discourse}} most relevant in the context of the current economic crisis is the Vyagghapajjasutta where a man named [[Dighajanu]] requested the [[Buddha]] to teach him how to lead a [[happy]] [[life]] with his wife and children. The [[Buddha]] said, i) You should be [[skilled]], efficient, earnest and energetic in whatever profession you are engaged in (utthana sampada); ii) you should {{Wiki|protect}} your income which you have earned righteously (arakkha sampada); iii) you should have good friends (kalyanamitta) who are faithful, learned, [[virtuous]], liberal and {{Wiki|intelligent}} who will help you along the right [[path]] away from [[evil]]; iv) you should spend a reasonable proportion of your income, neither too much nor too little, [[meaning]] you should not hoard [[wealth]] avariciously, nor should you be extravagant, you should [[live]] within your means (samajivikata). Then the [[Buddha]] expounded the [[four virtues]] conducive to a layman’s [[happiness]]: i) [[Saddha]] – [[faith]] and [[confidence]] in [[moral]], "[[spiritual]]" and [[intellectual]] values; ii) [[Sila]] – abstain from destroying and harming [[life]] from [[stealing]] and cheating, from [[adultery]], falsehood and [[intoxicating]] drinks; iii) Caga – practice [[charity]], [[generosity]] without [[attachment]] and [[craving]] for your [[wealth]]; and iv) [[Panna]] – develop [[wisdom]] which leads to the complete [[destruction]] of [[suffering]], to the [[realization]] of [[nirvana]] ([[Anguttara Nikaya]] 1929 P.T.S Edition pp. 786).
+
A {{Wiki|discourse}} most relevant in the context of the current economic crisis is the Vyagghapajjasutta where a man named [[Dighajanu]] requested the [[Buddha]] to teach him how to lead a [[happy]] [[life]] with his wife and children. The [[Buddha]] said, i) You should be [[skilled]], efficient, earnest and energetic in whatever profession you are engaged in (utthana sampada); ii) you should {{Wiki|protect}} your income which you have earned righteously (arakkha sampada); iii) you should have good friends ([[kalyanamitta]]) who are [[faithful]], learned, [[virtuous]], liberal and {{Wiki|intelligent}} who will help you along the right [[path]] away from [[evil]]; iv) you should spend a reasonable proportion of your income, neither too much nor too little, [[meaning]] you should not hoard [[wealth]] avariciously, nor should you be extravagant, you should [[live]] within your means (samajivikata). Then the [[Buddha]] expounded the [[four virtues]] conducive to a layman’s [[happiness]]: i) [[Saddha]] – [[faith]] and [[confidence]] in [[moral]], "[[spiritual]]" and [[intellectual]] values; ii) [[Sila]] – abstain from destroying and harming [[life]] from [[stealing]] and cheating, from [[adultery]], falsehood and [[intoxicating]] drinks; iii) [[Caga]] – practice [[charity]], [[generosity]] without [[attachment]] and [[craving]] for your [[wealth]]; and iv) [[Panna]] – develop [[wisdom]] which leads to the complete [[destruction]] of [[suffering]], to the [[realization]] of [[nirvana]] ([[Anguttara Nikaya]] 1929 P.T.S Edition pp. 786).
  
 
====[[Buddhist]] values in contemporary {{Wiki|society}}====
 
====[[Buddhist]] values in contemporary {{Wiki|society}}====
  
The question arises whether [[Buddhist]] values can have a message for contemporary {{Wiki|society}}. If we consider terms used in [[Buddhist texts]] like ‘[[kusala]]’ or ‘[[dhamma]]’ to convey the [[meaning]] of what we today define as ‘values’, the [[Buddha]] has eloquently discussed how values could change over [[time]]. In the [[Agganna Sutta]], the [[Buddha]] said: “That which was reckoned {{Wiki|immoral}} at that [[time]], is now reckoned to be [[moral]]”. ({{Wiki|Rhys Davids}} Translation). In the Cakkavattisihanada [[Sutta]], “In the future, as [[morality]] continues to degenerate, [[human]] [[life]] will continue to shorten to the point where the normal [[life]] span is 10 years …those who lack the honorable qualities of motherhood, fatherhood, will be the ones who receive homage...” ([[Thanissaro Bhikkhu]], 2002)
+
The question arises whether [[Buddhist]] values can have a message for contemporary {{Wiki|society}}. If we consider terms used in [[Buddhist texts]] like ‘[[kusala]]’ or ‘[[dhamma]]’ to convey the [[meaning]] of what we today define as ‘values’, the [[Buddha]] has eloquently discussed how values could change over [[time]]. In the [[Agganna Sutta]], the [[Buddha]] said: “That which was reckoned {{Wiki|immoral}} at that [[time]], is now reckoned to be [[moral]]”. ({{Wiki|Rhys Davids}} Translation). In the Cakkavattisihanada [[Sutta]], “In the {{Wiki|future}}, as [[morality]] continues to degenerate, [[human]] [[life]] will continue to shorten to the point where the normal [[life]] span is 10 years …those who lack the honorable qualities of motherhood, fatherhood, will be the ones who receive homage...” ([[Thanissaro Bhikkhu]], 2002)
  
 
====Core values in [[Buddhism]]====
 
====Core values in [[Buddhism]]====
  
Although the [[Buddha]] held that values change over [[time]], his teachings focus on a set of core values that transcend [[time]] and place. The [[Kalama Sutta]] exemplifies this in the simplest [[manner]]. When the Kalamas were confronted with the diversity of opinion on the nature of the good [[life]], the [[Buddha]] said that one should not go by report or [[tradition]], by the authority of others, or by speculative [[reason]]. One should make use of one's own observation and [[experience]] about the nature of [[life]] and thereby determine what is [[wholesome]] ([[kusala]]) and what is [[unwholesome]] ([[akusala]]). Critical [[awareness]] is the [[essence]] of [[Buddhism]]. [[Buddhist]] values can be summarized in three simple {{Wiki|principles}}: Avoid [[evil]], do good, and {{Wiki|purify}} the [[mind]] ([[Dhammapada]], 183).
+
Although the [[Buddha]] held that values change over [[time]], his teachings focus on a set of core values that transcend [[time]] and place. The [[Kalama Sutta]] exemplifies this in the simplest [[manner]]. When the [[Kalamas]] were confronted with the diversity of opinion on the [[nature]] of the good [[life]], the [[Buddha]] said that one should not go by report or [[tradition]], by the authority of others, or by speculative [[reason]]. One should make use of one's [[own]] observation and [[experience]] about the [[nature]] of [[life]] and thereby determine what is [[wholesome]] ([[kusala]]) and what is [[unwholesome]] ([[akusala]]). Critical [[awareness]] is the [[essence]] of [[Buddhism]]. [[Buddhist]] values can be summarized in three simple {{Wiki|principles}}: Avoid [[evil]], do good, and {{Wiki|purify}} the [[mind]] ([[Dhammapada]], 183).
  
 
====Wrong Globalization and [[roots]] of "[[evil]]"====
 
====Wrong Globalization and [[roots]] of "[[evil]]"====
 
[[File:Alvinhew deep-m.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Alvinhew deep-m.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
The {{Wiki|ecological}} problems, the environmental crisis, the problems of international relations, poverty, civil [[war]], and {{Wiki|social}} conflicts are all due to a lack of [[awareness]] about what in [[Buddha’s teaching]], are called akusalamula ([[unwholesome]] [[roots]]). These [[roots]] of [[evil]] are promoted in different false [[forms]] in the globalized {{Wiki|culture}}.
+
The {{Wiki|ecological}} problems, the {{Wiki|environmental}} crisis, the problems of international relations, {{Wiki|poverty}}, civil [[war]], and {{Wiki|social}} conflicts are all due to a lack of [[awareness]] about what in [[Buddha’s teaching]], are called [[akusalamula]] ([[unwholesome]] [[roots]]). These [[roots]] of [[evil]] are promoted in different false [[forms]] in the globalized {{Wiki|culture}}.
  
What are these [[roots]] of [[evil]]? [[Unwholesome]] characteristics are usually summarized as the [[three poisons]] or [[three roots]] of [[evil]]: [[lobha]] - [[greed]], [[dosa]] - [[anger]] and [[moha]] - [[delusion]]. The goal of the [[Buddhist]] way of [[life]] is to eliminate these [[roots]] by [[transforming]] them into their positive counterparts: [[greed]] into [[generosity]] ([[dana]]), [[anger]] into [[loving-kindness]] ([[metta]]), and [[delusion]] into [[wisdom]] ([[prajna]]).
+
What are these [[roots]] of [[evil]]? [[Unwholesome]] [[characteristics]] are usually summarized as the [[three poisons]] or [[three roots]] of [[evil]]: [[lobha]] - [[greed]], [[dosa]] - [[anger]] and [[moha]] - [[delusion]]. The goal of the [[Buddhist]] way of [[life]] is to eliminate these [[roots]] by [[transforming]] them into their positive counterparts: [[greed]] into [[generosity]] ([[dana]]), [[anger]] into [[loving-kindness]] ([[metta]]), and [[delusion]] into [[wisdom]] ([[prajna]]).
  
The [[Adittapariyaya Sutta]] ([[Samyutta Nikaya]] XXXV, 28) describes that [[existence]] is on [[fire]] - burning, [[being]] driven by our [[human]] [[greed]], [[hatred]] and [[ignorance]]. These are the ‘three fires’ or ‘[[three poisons]]’, also translated as “[[desire]], [[aversion]], [[illusion]]”. How do we extinguish this [[fire]] or cool ourselves?
+
The [[Adittapariyaya Sutta]] ([[Samyutta Nikaya]] XXXV, 28) describes that [[existence]] is on [[fire]] - burning, [[being]] driven by our [[human]] [[greed]], [[hatred]] and [[ignorance]]. These are the ‘[[three fires]]’ or ‘[[three poisons]]’, also translated as “[[desire]], [[aversion]], [[illusion]]”. How do we extinguish this [[fire]] or cool ourselves?
  
David Loy explains [[transforming]] these three “[[poisons]]” in [[relation]] to {{Wiki|social}} exploitation. He says that the ‘[[three poisons]]’ of personal [[suffering]] can be [[consciously]] [[transformed]] into their positive counterparts: [[greed]] into [[generosity]], [[ill-will]] into [[loving-kindness]], and [[delusion]] into [[wisdom]] (The [[Great]] [[Awakening]]: A [[Buddhistic]] {{Wiki|Social}} {{Wiki|Theory}}), [[Wisdom Publications]], Boston 2003)
+
[[David Loy]] explains [[transforming]] these three “[[poisons]]” in [[relation]] to {{Wiki|social}} exploitation. He says that the ‘[[three poisons]]’ of personal [[suffering]] can be [[consciously]] [[transformed]] into their positive counterparts: [[greed]] into [[generosity]], [[ill-will]] into [[loving-kindness]], and [[delusion]] into [[wisdom]] (The [[Great]] [[Awakening]]: A [[Buddhistic]] {{Wiki|Social}} {{Wiki|Theory}}), [[Wisdom Publications]], [[Boston]] 2003)
  
[[Thus]], the [[transformation]] of the ‘[[three poisons]]’ is a pre-requisite for cultivating compasssion. This means that the [[Buddhist]] solution for unjust {{Wiki|social}} systems is personal or {{Wiki|individual}} [[rational]] [[awareness]], ultimately [[manifesting]] unconditional [[kindness]] and [[compassion]] for all.
+
[[Thus]], the [[transformation]] of the ‘[[three poisons]]’ is a pre-requisite for [[cultivating]] compasssion. This means that the [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|solution}} for unjust {{Wiki|social}} systems is personal or {{Wiki|individual}} [[rational]] [[awareness]], ultimately [[manifesting]] unconditional [[kindness]] and [[compassion]] for all.
  
 
In this context, it is useful to focus on what David Edwards calls '[[Compassionate]] {{Wiki|Revolution}}' which expands the [[breath]] of [[compassion]] (1995 p. 11).
 
In this context, it is useful to focus on what David Edwards calls '[[Compassionate]] {{Wiki|Revolution}}' which expands the [[breath]] of [[compassion]] (1995 p. 11).
  
In my [[view]] it is [[compassion]] that marks the [[difference]] between mainstream and dissent, between the cliches of conformity and [[liberating insight]], between a murderous {{Wiki|status}} quo and change, between despair and {{Wiki|hope}} … [[Recognizing]] this great value of [[compassionate]] [[understanding]], [[Buddhism]] takes us in all our laughable [[self-importance]], greediness and irascability, and declares that even we can work on ourselves to {{Wiki|increase}} our compassion…In the process, we are told, we will [[experience]] freedom (from [[greed]], {{Wiki|fear}}, [[hatred]] and [[delusions]]).
+
In my [[view]] it is [[compassion]] that marks the [[difference]] between {{Wiki|mainstream}} and dissent, between the cliches of conformity and [[liberating insight]], between a murderous {{Wiki|status}} quo and change, between {{Wiki|despair}} and {{Wiki|hope}} … [[Recognizing]] this great value of [[compassionate]] [[understanding]], [[Buddhism]] takes us in all our laughable [[self-importance]], greediness and irascability, and declares that even we can work on ourselves to {{Wiki|increase}} our compassion…In the process, we are told, we will [[experience]] freedom (from [[greed]], {{Wiki|fear}}, [[hatred]] and [[delusions]]).
 
[[File:132.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:132.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
Furthermore, Stephen Batchelor makes a significant contribution to the [[understanding]] of the [[roots]] when he says,
+
Furthermore, [[Stephen Batchelor]] makes a significant contribution to the [[understanding]] of the [[roots]] when he says,
  
"The contemporary {{Wiki|social}} engagement of [[dharma]] practice is [[rooted]] in [[awareness]] of how self-centred confusion and [[craving]] can no longer be adequately understood only as [[psychological]] drives that [[manifest]] themselves in subjective states of anguish. We find these drives [[embodied]] in the very economic, military, and {{Wiki|political}} structures that [[influence]] the [[lives]] of the majority of [[people]] on [[earth]]. (Stephen Batchelor, [[Buddhism]] Without [[Beliefs]] – A Contemporary Guide To [[Awakening]], Bloomsbury, 1997, P. 112).
+
"The contemporary {{Wiki|social}} engagement of [[dharma]] practice is [[rooted]] in [[awareness]] of how self-centred [[confusion]] and [[craving]] can no longer be adequately understood only as [[psychological]] drives that [[manifest]] themselves in [[subjective]] states of anguish. We find these drives [[embodied]] in the very economic, {{Wiki|military}}, and {{Wiki|political}} structures that [[influence]] the [[lives]] of the majority of [[people]] on [[earth]]. ([[Stephen Batchelor]], [[Buddhism]] Without [[Beliefs]] – A Contemporary Guide To [[Awakening]], Bloomsbury, 1997, P. 112).
  
 
Another important issue is as to how we reduce [[unwholesome]] values and develop the more [[wholesome]] ones. This process is [[symbolized]] by the [[lotus flower]]. Although [[rooted]] in the mud and muck at the bottom of a pond, the [[lotus]] grows upwards to bloom on the surface, thus representing our potential to {{Wiki|purify}} ourselves.
 
Another important issue is as to how we reduce [[unwholesome]] values and develop the more [[wholesome]] ones. This process is [[symbolized]] by the [[lotus flower]]. Although [[rooted]] in the mud and muck at the bottom of a pond, the [[lotus]] grows upwards to bloom on the surface, thus representing our potential to {{Wiki|purify}} ourselves.
  
====Significance of one’s own change====
+
====Significance of one’s [[own]] change====
  
[[Buddhism]] teaches that the {{Wiki|individual}} can overcome {{Wiki|external}} [[influences]] through the development of [[mindfulness]], through the development of one's inner nature without waiting for all the {{Wiki|external}} [[conditions]] to change. [[Buddhism]] maintains that we are capable of bringing about a change inwardly. One cannot change all the {{Wiki|external}} factors in the outside [[world]]. If we develop our inner selves, we can overcome the outside [[influences]]. That is why [[Buddhism]] maintains that we can [[live]] happily in this [[world]] even amidst [[people]] who are [[unhappy]]. The only way this value crisis can be overcome is by resorting to the [[Buddhist]] solution that the [[Buddha]] had made known to the [[world]] many centuries ago.
+
[[Buddhism]] teaches that the {{Wiki|individual}} can overcome {{Wiki|external}} [[influences]] through the [[development]] of [[mindfulness]], through the [[development]] of one's inner [[nature]] without waiting for all the {{Wiki|external}} [[conditions]] to change. [[Buddhism]] maintains that we are capable of bringing about a change inwardly. One cannot change all the {{Wiki|external}} factors in the outside [[world]]. If we develop our inner selves, we can overcome the outside [[influences]]. That is why [[Buddhism]] maintains that we can [[live]] happily in this [[world]] even amidst [[people]] who are [[unhappy]]. The only way this value crisis can be overcome is by resorting to the [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|solution}} that the [[Buddha]] had made known to the [[world]] many centuries ago.
  
Self-transformation, [[Bhikkhu Bodhi]] says, is also a fundamental goal of the [[Buddha's teaching]], for [[liberation]] from [[suffering]]. “The [[Dhamma]] was never intended for those who are already perfect {{Wiki|saints}}. It is addressed to fallible [[human beings]] beset with all the shortcomings typical of unpolished [[human nature]]: conduct that is fickle and impulsive, [[minds]] that are tainted by [[greed]], [[anger]] and [[selfishness]], [[views]] that are distorted and [[habits]] that lead to {{Wiki|harm}} for oneself and others. The [[purpose]] of the [[teaching]] is to [[transform]] such [[people]] -- ourselves -- into "accomplished ones": into those whose every [[action]] is [[pure]], whose [[minds]] are [[calm]] and composed, whose [[wisdom]] has fathomed the deepest [[truths]] and whose conduct is always marked by a [[compassionate]] [[concern]] for others and for the welfare of the [[world]]. ([[Bhikkhu Bodhi]], Summer-Fall 1990)
+
Self-transformation, [[Bhikkhu Bodhi]] says, is also a fundamental goal of the [[Buddha's teaching]], for [[liberation]] from [[suffering]]. “The [[Dhamma]] was never intended for those who are already {{Wiki|perfect}} {{Wiki|saints}}. It is addressed to fallible [[human beings]] beset with all the shortcomings typical of unpolished [[human nature]]: conduct that is fickle and impulsive, [[minds]] that are [[tainted]] by [[greed]], [[anger]] and [[selfishness]], [[views]] that are distorted and [[habits]] that lead to {{Wiki|harm}} for oneself and others. The [[purpose]] of the [[teaching]] is to [[transform]] such [[people]] -- ourselves -- into "[[accomplished ones]]": into those whose every [[action]] is [[pure]], whose [[minds]] are [[calm]] and composed, whose [[wisdom]] has fathomed the deepest [[truths]] and whose conduct is always marked by a [[compassionate]] [[concern]] for others and for the {{Wiki|welfare}} of the [[world]]. ([[Bhikkhu Bodhi]], Summer-Fall 1990)
  
 
====[[Buddhist]] values and {{Wiki|social}} [[philosophy]]====
 
====[[Buddhist]] values and {{Wiki|social}} [[philosophy]]====
 
[[File:Meditation.png|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Meditation.png|thumb|250px|]]
This paper also seeks to examine the close connection between [[Buddhist]] values and {{Wiki|social}} [[philosophy]], especially in terms of what we have to do for the good of {{Wiki|society}} and the relationship that [[exists]] between the {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|ideal}} and the personal {{Wiki|ideal}}. It is clear from the [[Buddha's]] discourses, that the creation of {{Wiki|social}} [[conditions]] [[favourable]] to the {{Wiki|individual}} was a major [[concern]] among the early [[Buddhists]].
+
This paper also seeks to examine the close [[connection]] between [[Buddhist]] values and {{Wiki|social}} [[philosophy]], especially in terms of what we have to do for the good of {{Wiki|society}} and the relationship that [[exists]] between the {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|ideal}} and the personal {{Wiki|ideal}}. It is clear from the [[Buddha's]] [[discourses]], that the creation of {{Wiki|social}} [[conditions]] [[favourable]] to the {{Wiki|individual}} was a major [[concern]] among the early [[Buddhists]].
  
The relationship between the personal {{Wiki|ideal}} and the {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|ideal}} is best summarised thus:. “He who has [[understanding]] and great [[wisdom]] does not think of harming himself or another, nor of harming both alike. He rather [[thinks]] of his own welfare, of that of others, of that of both, and of the welfare of the whole [[world]]. In that way one shows [[understanding]] and great [[wisdom]]." ([[Anguttara Nikaya]] No. 186), or "By protecting oneself (e.g., morally), one protects others; by protecting others, one protects oneself." ([[Samyutta Nikaya]] 47).
+
The relationship between the personal {{Wiki|ideal}} and the {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|ideal}} is best summarised thus:. “He who has [[understanding]] and great [[wisdom]] does not think of harming himself or another, nor of harming both alike. He rather [[thinks]] of his [[own]] {{Wiki|welfare}}, of that of others, of that of both, and of the {{Wiki|welfare}} of the whole [[world]]. In that way one shows [[understanding]] and great [[wisdom]]." ([[Anguttara Nikaya]] No. 186), or "By protecting oneself (e.g., {{Wiki|morally}}), one protects others; by protecting others, one protects oneself." ([[Samyutta Nikaya]] 47).
  
This [[concern]] has [[manifested]] itself in the {{Wiki|concept}} of the "welfare state" created by the [[Buddhist]] [[emperor]], [[Asoka]] (B.C. 274-236) and in [[Sri Lanka]] by his contemporary [[Tissa]]. [[Walpola Rahula]] stated, "[[Buddhism]] arose in [[India]] as a [[spiritual]] force against {{Wiki|social}} injustices, against degrading superstitious [[rites]], {{Wiki|ceremonies}} and sacrifices; it denounced the tyranny of the [[caste]] system and advocated the equality of all men; it emancipated woman and gave her complete [[spiritual]] freedom." ([[Rahula]], Walpola, 1978).
+
This [[concern]] has [[manifested]] itself in the {{Wiki|concept}} of the "{{Wiki|welfare}} [[state]]" created by the [[Buddhist]] [[emperor]], [[Asoka]] (B.C. 274-236) and in [[Sri Lanka]] by his contemporary [[Tissa]]. [[Walpola Rahula]] stated, "[[Buddhism]] arose in [[India]] as a [[spiritual]] force against {{Wiki|social}} injustices, against degrading {{Wiki|superstitious}} [[rites]], {{Wiki|ceremonies}} and [[sacrifices]]; it denounced the tyranny of the [[caste]] system and advocated the equality of all men; it emancipated woman and gave her complete [[spiritual]] freedom." ([[Rahula]], [[Walpola]], 1978).
  
====Navigating the future====
+
====Navigating the {{Wiki|future}}====
  
 
The above are about the more immediate and the {{Wiki|tangible}}. But there are developments through globalisation that finds resonance in [[Buddhist]] [[ideas]].
 
The above are about the more immediate and the {{Wiki|tangible}}. But there are developments through globalisation that finds resonance in [[Buddhist]] [[ideas]].
  
One {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], it should be noted, could today [[live]] [[because of]] travel, migration and the Internet in several different {{Wiki|cultural}} [[worlds]]. Earlier, when communities were simple and relatively isolated, a [[person]] had generally one {{Wiki|cultural}} [[realm]] which he or she occupied. An {{Wiki|individual}} could today generally be a member of his "original" community, his new home as a migrant, his transborder expatriate community or his virtual electronic community, say his e-mail friends. Each of these communities could also have different sub groups within them. The contents of a citizen's [[mind]] are thus increasingly composed of [[elements]], not exclusive to a country, {{Wiki|ethnic}} group or region. [[Thus]], no firm separatism within the {{Wiki|internal}} {{Wiki|cultural}} [[world]] of an {{Wiki|individual}}, is objectively possible, nor viable in a {{Wiki|real}} [[sense]] in today's globalised [[world]]. A {{Wiki|cultural}} fragmentation of the [[mind]] occurs, with multiple frames of reference for [[action]], corresponding to each sub {{Wiki|culture}}. For those familiar with the [[Buddhist]] deconstruction of the [[self]] will not find these new developments strange. The [[Buddha]] himself deconstructed the [[mind]] and said there was no [[self]] there. Recognising this lack of [[self]] would help us navigate the new globalised [[world]] (Susantha Goonatilake, 1994).
+
One {{Wiki|individual}} [[self]], it should be noted, could today [[live]] [[because of]] travel, migration and the [[Internet]] in several different {{Wiki|cultural}} [[worlds]]. Earlier, when communities were simple and relatively isolated, a [[person]] had generally one {{Wiki|cultural}} [[realm]] which he or she occupied. An {{Wiki|individual}} could today generally be a member of his "original" {{Wiki|community}}, his new home as a migrant, his transborder expatriate {{Wiki|community}} or his virtual electronic {{Wiki|community}}, say his e-mail friends. Each of these communities could also have different sub groups within them. The contents of a citizen's [[mind]] are thus increasingly composed of [[elements]], not exclusive to a country, {{Wiki|ethnic}} group or region. [[Thus]], no firm separatism within the {{Wiki|internal}} {{Wiki|cultural}} [[world]] of an {{Wiki|individual}}, is objectively possible, nor viable in a {{Wiki|real}} [[sense]] in today's globalised [[world]]. A {{Wiki|cultural}} fragmentation of the [[mind]] occurs, with multiple frames of reference for [[action]], [[corresponding]] to each sub {{Wiki|culture}}. For those familiar with the [[Buddhist]] deconstruction of the [[self]] will not find these new developments strange. The [[Buddha]] himself deconstructed the [[mind]] and said there was no [[self]] there. Recognising this lack of [[self]] would help us navigate the new globalised [[world]] (Susantha Goonatilake, 1994).
 
Similarly, new developments in biotechnology and advanced electronics, are deconstructing and reconstructing the [[body]] as we daily hear of new developments. The [[body]] we are born with is increasingly becoming malleable and [[transformed]]. Again here, the [[Buddhist]] deconstruction of the [[body]] would be a useful pointer for us to navigate this new coming [[world]] (Susantha Goonatilake, 2004 pp. 117 - 135).
 
Similarly, new developments in biotechnology and advanced electronics, are deconstructing and reconstructing the [[body]] as we daily hear of new developments. The [[body]] we are born with is increasingly becoming malleable and [[transformed]]. Again here, the [[Buddhist]] deconstruction of the [[body]] would be a useful pointer for us to navigate this new coming [[world]] (Susantha Goonatilake, 2004 pp. 117 - 135).
  
 
===={{Wiki|Conclusions}}====
 
===={{Wiki|Conclusions}}====
 
[[File:304.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:304.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
On the positive side of current developments is the globalisation of [[Buddhism]] itself to an unprecedented level. Communications technology has enabled [[people]] from around the globe to connect with one another. Hundreds of [[Buddhist]] directories, TVchannels, [[information]] networks unite [[people]] around the [[world]] to think together and work together.
+
On the positive side of current developments is the globalisation of [[Buddhism]] itself to an unprecedented level. Communications technology has enabled [[people]] from around the {{Wiki|globe}} to connect with one another. Hundreds of [[Buddhist]] directories, TVchannels, [[information]] networks unite [[people]] around the [[world]] to think together and work together.
  
The growth of [[Buddhism]] in the {{Wiki|West}}, in particular, the popularity of [[meditation]] [[retreats]] and materials on [[Buddhist]] [[spirituality]] has had an impact on [[traditionally]] [[Buddhist]] countries. Translated works of the teachings of other sects have widened the [[religious]] horizons of [[traditional]] [[Buddhists]]. [[Information]] channeled through trans-national media networks on {{Wiki|increasing}} dialogue between [[Buddhism]] and Western [[science]] and experiments [[being]] done on [[Buddhist meditation]] in Western laboratories give them a [[sense]] of [[identity]] which is [[being]] fast eroded in [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|societies}}, swamped by unethical [[conversion]] by evangelical {{Wiki|Christians}}.
+
The growth of [[Buddhism]] in the {{Wiki|West}}, in particular, the [[popularity]] of [[meditation]] [[retreats]] and materials on [[Buddhist]] [[spirituality]] has had an impact on [[traditionally]] [[Buddhist]] countries. Translated works of the teachings of other sects have widened the [[religious]] horizons of [[traditional]] [[Buddhists]]. [[Information]] channeled through trans-national media networks on {{Wiki|increasing}} {{Wiki|dialogue}} between [[Buddhism]] and [[Western]] [[science]] and experiments [[being]] done on [[Buddhist meditation]] in [[Western]] laboratories give them a [[sense]] of [[identity]] which is [[being]] fast eroded in [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|societies}}, swamped by {{Wiki|unethical}} [[conversion]] by evangelical {{Wiki|Christians}}.
  
The initiative made by [[His Holiness]] the [[Dalai Lama]] and Western thinkers such as the late Varela to integrate [[science]] with the [[Buddhist]] approach of self-transformation could in the near future make a significant contribution to [[transform]] {{Wiki|society}} in the age of globalisation. With the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} this could be easier.
+
The initiative made by [[His Holiness]] the [[Dalai Lama]] and [[Western]] thinkers such as the late Varela to integrate [[science]] with the [[Buddhist]] approach of self-transformation could in the near {{Wiki|future}} make a significant contribution to [[transform]] {{Wiki|society}} in the age of globalisation. With the rise of {{Wiki|Asia}} this could be easier.
  
 
{{R}}
 
{{R}}
Line 96: Line 105:
 
*Cakkavattisihanada [[Sutta]]: The [[Wheel]] turning [[Emperor]], translated from the [[Pali]] by [[Thanissaro Bhikkhu]], PTS Dighanikays iii 58, 2002
 
*Cakkavattisihanada [[Sutta]]: The [[Wheel]] turning [[Emperor]], translated from the [[Pali]] by [[Thanissaro Bhikkhu]], PTS Dighanikays iii 58, 2002
  
*Batchelor, Stephen, [[Buddhism]] Without [[Beliefs]] – A Contemporary Guide To [[Awakening]], Bloomsbury, 1997
+
*[[Batchelor]], Stephen, [[Buddhism]] Without [[Beliefs]] – A Contemporary Guide To [[Awakening]], Bloomsbury, 1997
  
 
*[[Bodhi]], [[Bhikkhu]], [[Buddhist]] Publication {{Wiki|Society}} Newsletter cover essay #16, Summer-Fall 1990
 
*[[Bodhi]], [[Bhikkhu]], [[Buddhist]] Publication {{Wiki|Society}} Newsletter cover essay #16, Summer-Fall 1990
  
*Edwards, David, [[Compassionate]] {{Wiki|Revolution}}, Radical Politics and [[Buddhism]], Green [[Books]], Devon 1995
+
*Edwards, David, [[Compassionate]] {{Wiki|Revolution}}, Radical Politics and [[Buddhism]], [[Green]] [[Books]], {{Wiki|Devon}} 1995
  
*Goonatilake, Susantha, “The Wandering [[Self]]: Between {{Wiki|Cultural}} Localization and Globalization” in The Futures Of Cultures, {{Wiki|UNESCO}} Paris. 1994
+
*Goonatilake, Susantha, “The Wandering [[Self]]: Between {{Wiki|Cultural}} Localization and Globalization” in The Futures Of Cultures, {{Wiki|UNESCO}} {{Wiki|Paris}}. 1994
  
*Goonatilake, Susantha, “[[Buddhist]] Foundational Approaches in Bioethics”, Journal of [[Buddhist Studies]], Centre of [[Buddhist Studies]], {{Wiki|Colombo}}, [[Sri Lanka]], Volume 2, January 2004
+
*Goonatilake, Susantha, “[[Buddhist]] Foundational Approaches in {{Wiki|Bioethics}}”, Journal of [[Buddhist Studies]], Centre of [[Buddhist Studies]], {{Wiki|Colombo}}, [[Sri Lanka]], Volume 2, January 2004
  
*Loy, David, The [[Great]] [[Awakening]]: A [[Buddhistic]] {{Wiki|Social}} {{Wiki|Theory}}, [[Wisdom Publications]], Boston 2003
+
*Loy, David, The [[Great]] [[Awakening]]: A [[Buddhistic]] {{Wiki|Social}} {{Wiki|Theory}}, [[Wisdom Publications]], [[Boston]] 2003
  
*[[Rahula]], Walpola, [[Zen]] and the taming of the bull: Essays, Gordon Fraser, 1978
+
*[[Rahula]], [[Walpola]], [[Zen]] and the taming of the bull: Essays, Gordon Fraser, 1978
  
 
*[[Samyutta Nikaya]] ([[Kindred Sayings]] 47)
 
*[[Samyutta Nikaya]] ([[Kindred Sayings]] 47)
  
 
{{R}}
 
{{R}}
Author: Hema Goonatilake<br/>
+
Author: [[Hema]] Goonatilake<br/>
 
[http://buddhismandaustralia.com/index.php/en/articles/articles-2012/98-buddhist-values-and-globalization-hema-goonatilake-phd.html buddhismandaustralia.com]
 
[http://buddhismandaustralia.com/index.php/en/articles/articles-2012/98-buddhist-values-and-globalization-hema-goonatilake-phd.html buddhismandaustralia.com]
  

Latest revision as of 17:42, 21 December 2023

Introduction

Meditation-graphic.jpg





The aim of this paper is to examine the extent to which Buddhist values and ideas could be realised in the face of globalization. Let me begin with a personal note. I come from Sri Lanka which in the first millennium was at the crossroads of the then globalisation. This is indicated by the majority group of Sinhalese having the largest genetic diversity in the country compared to other ethnic groups - over the centuries there had been genetic mixing from various parts of the world. The then Sinhalese, almost exclusively Buddhist, travelled to the then far corners of the world as revealed by records in Rome, China, Southeast Asia and the lands in between. Buddhism itself was carried through travel and the then incipient globalisation to East Asia and West Asia and possibly even further afield. So, Buddhism was in the forefront of the global travel of ideas. Buddhists should not, therefore, be afraid of the global as it is in their "genes" as it were.

Capital, technology, knowledge and to a lesser extent, labour had become much more mobile in today's globalised order. Globalisation in culture today is brought about by people sharing their thoughts, actions, ideas, in short, their culture, across vast distances. This is through mass tourism, migrant workers and refugees. Penetration of trade, financial links, travel and telecommunications increase this shared universe. Globalisation cuts both ways for Buddhists. Globalisation has helped Asian countries almost all having the imprint of Buddhism if not now during their history to become rising economic powers. Globalisation has also resulted in the spread of Buddhist practices like meditation to all parts of the world and seems to be following the spread of yoga practices in earlier decades to become in the future almost a household Western practice. International exchange of Buddhist scholars and practitioners has facilitated the spread of Buddhist ideas across the globe.

Adverse Aspects of Globalisation

The crisis brought about by the negative aspects of globalization has resulted in droughts, floods, economic dislocation, internal conflict, debt, poverty and social inequalities in the contemporary world. This has led to unrest among the poor classes. The middle and upper classes are in the process of waking up to the real situation as their economies are failing. There is now an opportunity for people to develop a true critical self awareness of the negative features of globalization and take serious note of the solution which the Buddha had made known to the world many centuries ago. Buddha's teachings are needed more than ever in this age of globalisation.

Economic globalization without values developed with the underlying assumption that globalization brings jobs, technology, income and wealth to societies with new conditions that these societies were willing to submit to the principles of the free market, privatizing public services etc. This has resulted in poverty and powerlessness of the majority of people, the destruction of community, depletion of natural resources and devastating environmental effects. Let us review some of the negative aspects.

According to the Worldwatch Institute, more goods and services were consumed in the forty years between 1950 and 1990 (measured in constant dollars) than by all the previous generations in human history. According to the United Nations Human Development Report for 1999, a child in the developed countries consumes and pollutes 30 to 50 times as much as a poor one in an undeveloped country. Today 1.2 billion people survive on less than a dollar a day, and almost half the world's population live on less than two dollars a day. The 20% of people in the richest countries enjoy 86% of the world's consumption, the poorest 20% only 1.3%. Thus, globalization has increased the gap between the rich and the poor. The rise of new awareness in the West and also the rise of Asia could with correct ideas and attitudes change this situation.

-008.jpg

The current spate of globalisation has also brought about a homogenization of culture through a variety of social and cultural developments. According to the same UNHDR report, the world spent at least $435 billion in the previous year for advertising, plus well over $100 billion for public relations and marketing. The result is 270 million "global teens", who now inhabit a single pop-culture world, consuming the same designer clothes, music, mostly emerging from the West. This new corporate culture has destroyed the local cultures and traditional ways of living that have evolved over thousands of years and appropriate to their local conditions and environment. As a result, social relationships too have disrupted. But it seems the movement is in the opposite direction with increasingly global trends being set in Asia and the non-West - again a product of globalisation.

The collapse of the empire of globalization

In mid-2011, the Canadian-based group, Adbusters Media Foundation, known for its advertisement-free anti-consumerist magazine, Adbusters initiated a peaceful occupation of Wall Street to protest against a growing disparity in wealth, and the absence of legal repercussions behind the recent global crisis. Their slogan "We are the 99%" refers to the concentration of wealth among the top 1% of income earners which had nearly tripled over the last thirty years. Prior to that, Occupy Dataran movement had begun on July 30, 2011, and by October 9, Occupy protests were ongoing in over 95 cities across 82 countries and in over 600 communities in the US. This was a reflection of the spread of neo-liberalism (combined with the push from neocons and theocons of the Bible belt in the USA). It was also a partial reflection of the rise of Asia through which as a result of globalisation, jobs from the West were being sucked into Asia. The current economic travails had not affected Asia that much.

Bhikkhu Bodhi's statement endorsing his support to the non-violent occupation of Washington, DC, describes the problem as well as the solution as follows:

We live at a time when perpetual warfare, the crackdown on civil liberties, economic and social injustices, and most ominously, the desecration of the biosphere, are threatening human civilization. We now stand at a crossroads presenting us with a simple choice: either we make major changes in our social and economic policies to ensure human flourishing on earth, or we carry on with "business as usual" despite the prospects of unprecedented catastrophe. I want to participate to show that I favor choosing the former alternative.

This "perpetual warfare", a reflection of neocons and theocons in the US reaching for empire has reached exhaustion, and the US overstretched militarily as well as economically and in debt to Asia, is now coming to an end. Asia in the meantime is on the rise. And it is "The Light of Asia" namely Buddhism in the words of Edwin Arnold that has come to the fore now.

The Buddha’s attitude to wealth, investment and saving

00,0.jpg

The Buddha did not despise wealth and the wealthy. Anathapindika and Visakha, his closest supporters were among the wealthiest. While he guided the people to attain the ultimate truth, he encouraged lay people to accumulate wealth, but through righteous means. Happiness that wealth brings was classified as, the happiness of having wealth, the happiness of consuming wealth, the happiness of freedom from debt and the happiness of being blameless in conduct. He advised Sigala, going into detail about consuming, investing and saving, for example, consume one-fourth, invest two­-fourths and save one-fourth.

A discourse most relevant in the context of the current economic crisis is the Vyagghapajjasutta where a man named Dighajanu requested the Buddha to teach him how to lead a happy life with his wife and children. The Buddha said, i) You should be skilled, efficient, earnest and energetic in whatever profession you are engaged in (utthana sampada); ii) you should protect your income which you have earned righteously (arakkha sampada); iii) you should have good friends (kalyanamitta) who are faithful, learned, virtuous, liberal and intelligent who will help you along the right path away from evil; iv) you should spend a reasonable proportion of your income, neither too much nor too little, meaning you should not hoard wealth avariciously, nor should you be extravagant, you should live within your means (samajivikata). Then the Buddha expounded the four virtues conducive to a layman’s happiness: i) Saddhafaith and confidence in moral, "spiritual" and intellectual values; ii) Sila – abstain from destroying and harming life from stealing and cheating, from adultery, falsehood and intoxicating drinks; iii) Caga – practice charity, generosity without attachment and craving for your wealth; and iv) Panna – develop wisdom which leads to the complete destruction of suffering, to the realization of nirvana (Anguttara Nikaya 1929 P.T.S Edition pp. 786).

Buddhist values in contemporary society

The question arises whether Buddhist values can have a message for contemporary society. If we consider terms used in Buddhist texts like ‘kusala’ or ‘dhamma’ to convey the meaning of what we today define as ‘values’, the Buddha has eloquently discussed how values could change over time. In the Agganna Sutta, the Buddha said: “That which was reckoned immoral at that time, is now reckoned to be moral”. (Rhys Davids Translation). In the Cakkavattisihanada Sutta, “In the future, as morality continues to degenerate, human life will continue to shorten to the point where the normal life span is 10 years …those who lack the honorable qualities of motherhood, fatherhood, will be the ones who receive homage...” (Thanissaro Bhikkhu, 2002)

Core values in Buddhism

Although the Buddha held that values change over time, his teachings focus on a set of core values that transcend time and place. The Kalama Sutta exemplifies this in the simplest manner. When the Kalamas were confronted with the diversity of opinion on the nature of the good life, the Buddha said that one should not go by report or tradition, by the authority of others, or by speculative reason. One should make use of one's own observation and experience about the nature of life and thereby determine what is wholesome (kusala) and what is unwholesome (akusala). Critical awareness is the essence of Buddhism. Buddhist values can be summarized in three simple principles: Avoid evil, do good, and purify the mind (Dhammapada, 183).

Wrong Globalization and roots of "evil"

Alvinhew deep-m.jpg

The ecological problems, the environmental crisis, the problems of international relations, poverty, civil war, and social conflicts are all due to a lack of awareness about what in Buddha’s teaching, are called akusalamula (unwholesome roots). These roots of evil are promoted in different false forms in the globalized culture.

What are these roots of evil? Unwholesome characteristics are usually summarized as the three poisons or three roots of evil: lobha - greed, dosa - anger and moha - delusion. The goal of the Buddhist way of life is to eliminate these roots by transforming them into their positive counterparts: greed into generosity (dana), anger into loving-kindness (metta), and delusion into wisdom (prajna).

The Adittapariyaya Sutta (Samyutta Nikaya XXXV, 28) describes that existence is on fire - burning, being driven by our human greed, hatred and ignorance. These are the ‘three fires’ or ‘three poisons’, also translated as “desire, aversion, illusion”. How do we extinguish this fire or cool ourselves?

David Loy explains transforming these three “poisons” in relation to social exploitation. He says that the ‘three poisons’ of personal suffering can be consciously transformed into their positive counterparts: greed into generosity, ill-will into loving-kindness, and delusion into wisdom (The Great Awakening: A Buddhistic Social Theory), Wisdom Publications, Boston 2003)

Thus, the transformation of the ‘three poisons’ is a pre-requisite for cultivating compasssion. This means that the Buddhist solution for unjust social systems is personal or individual rational awareness, ultimately manifesting unconditional kindness and compassion for all.

In this context, it is useful to focus on what David Edwards calls 'Compassionate Revolution' which expands the breath of compassion (1995 p. 11).

In my view it is compassion that marks the difference between mainstream and dissent, between the cliches of conformity and liberating insight, between a murderous status quo and change, between despair and hopeRecognizing this great value of compassionate understanding, Buddhism takes us in all our laughable self-importance, greediness and irascability, and declares that even we can work on ourselves to increase our compassion…In the process, we are told, we will experience freedom (from greed, fear, hatred and delusions).

132.jpg

Furthermore, Stephen Batchelor makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the roots when he says,

"The contemporary social engagement of dharma practice is rooted in awareness of how self-centred confusion and craving can no longer be adequately understood only as psychological drives that manifest themselves in subjective states of anguish. We find these drives embodied in the very economic, military, and political structures that influence the lives of the majority of people on earth. (Stephen Batchelor, Buddhism Without Beliefs – A Contemporary Guide To Awakening, Bloomsbury, 1997, P. 112).

Another important issue is as to how we reduce unwholesome values and develop the more wholesome ones. This process is symbolized by the lotus flower. Although rooted in the mud and muck at the bottom of a pond, the lotus grows upwards to bloom on the surface, thus representing our potential to purify ourselves.

Significance of one’s own change

Buddhism teaches that the individual can overcome external influences through the development of mindfulness, through the development of one's inner nature without waiting for all the external conditions to change. Buddhism maintains that we are capable of bringing about a change inwardly. One cannot change all the external factors in the outside world. If we develop our inner selves, we can overcome the outside influences. That is why Buddhism maintains that we can live happily in this world even amidst people who are unhappy. The only way this value crisis can be overcome is by resorting to the Buddhist solution that the Buddha had made known to the world many centuries ago.

Self-transformation, Bhikkhu Bodhi says, is also a fundamental goal of the Buddha's teaching, for liberation from suffering. “The Dhamma was never intended for those who are already perfect saints. It is addressed to fallible human beings beset with all the shortcomings typical of unpolished human nature: conduct that is fickle and impulsive, minds that are tainted by greed, anger and selfishness, views that are distorted and habits that lead to harm for oneself and others. The purpose of the teaching is to transform such people -- ourselves -- into "accomplished ones": into those whose every action is pure, whose minds are calm and composed, whose wisdom has fathomed the deepest truths and whose conduct is always marked by a compassionate concern for others and for the welfare of the world. (Bhikkhu Bodhi, Summer-Fall 1990)

Buddhist values and social philosophy

Meditation.png

This paper also seeks to examine the close connection between Buddhist values and social philosophy, especially in terms of what we have to do for the good of society and the relationship that exists between the social ideal and the personal ideal. It is clear from the Buddha's discourses, that the creation of social conditions favourable to the individual was a major concern among the early Buddhists.

The relationship between the personal ideal and the social ideal is best summarised thus:. “He who has understanding and great wisdom does not think of harming himself or another, nor of harming both alike. He rather thinks of his own welfare, of that of others, of that of both, and of the welfare of the whole world. In that way one shows understanding and great wisdom." (Anguttara Nikaya No. 186), or "By protecting oneself (e.g., morally), one protects others; by protecting others, one protects oneself." (Samyutta Nikaya 47).

This concern has manifested itself in the concept of the "welfare state" created by the Buddhist emperor, Asoka (B.C. 274-236) and in Sri Lanka by his contemporary Tissa. Walpola Rahula stated, "Buddhism arose in India as a spiritual force against social injustices, against degrading superstitious rites, ceremonies and sacrifices; it denounced the tyranny of the caste system and advocated the equality of all men; it emancipated woman and gave her complete spiritual freedom." (Rahula, Walpola, 1978).

Navigating the future

The above are about the more immediate and the tangible. But there are developments through globalisation that finds resonance in Buddhist ideas.

One individual self, it should be noted, could today live because of travel, migration and the Internet in several different cultural worlds. Earlier, when communities were simple and relatively isolated, a person had generally one cultural realm which he or she occupied. An individual could today generally be a member of his "original" community, his new home as a migrant, his transborder expatriate community or his virtual electronic community, say his e-mail friends. Each of these communities could also have different sub groups within them. The contents of a citizen's mind are thus increasingly composed of elements, not exclusive to a country, ethnic group or region. Thus, no firm separatism within the internal cultural world of an individual, is objectively possible, nor viable in a real sense in today's globalised world. A cultural fragmentation of the mind occurs, with multiple frames of reference for action, corresponding to each sub culture. For those familiar with the Buddhist deconstruction of the self will not find these new developments strange. The Buddha himself deconstructed the mind and said there was no self there. Recognising this lack of self would help us navigate the new globalised world (Susantha Goonatilake, 1994). Similarly, new developments in biotechnology and advanced electronics, are deconstructing and reconstructing the body as we daily hear of new developments. The body we are born with is increasingly becoming malleable and transformed. Again here, the Buddhist deconstruction of the body would be a useful pointer for us to navigate this new coming world (Susantha Goonatilake, 2004 pp. 117 - 135).

Conclusions

304.jpg

On the positive side of current developments is the globalisation of Buddhism itself to an unprecedented level. Communications technology has enabled people from around the globe to connect with one another. Hundreds of Buddhist directories, TVchannels, information networks unite people around the world to think together and work together.

The growth of Buddhism in the West, in particular, the popularity of meditation retreats and materials on Buddhist spirituality has had an impact on traditionally Buddhist countries. Translated works of the teachings of other sects have widened the religious horizons of traditional Buddhists. Information channeled through trans-national media networks on increasing dialogue between Buddhism and Western science and experiments being done on Buddhist meditation in Western laboratories give them a sense of identity which is being fast eroded in Buddhist societies, swamped by unethical conversion by evangelical Christians.

The initiative made by His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Western thinkers such as the late Varela to integrate science with the Buddhist approach of self-transformation could in the near future make a significant contribution to transform society in the age of globalisation. With the rise of Asia this could be easier.

Source

  • Goonatilake, Susantha, “The Wandering Self: Between Cultural Localization and Globalization” in The Futures Of Cultures, UNESCO Paris. 1994

Source

Author: Hema Goonatilake
buddhismandaustralia.com