Difference between revisions of "Shenhui"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DisplayImages|1377|410|3769|2882|2958}} | {{DisplayImages|1377|410|3769|2882|2958}} | ||
<poem> | <poem> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[Heze Shenhui]] ({{Wiki|Chinese}}:[[菏泽神會/神会]]; Wade–Giles: [[Shen-hui]]; [[Japanese]]: [[Kataku Jinne]], 670-762) was a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist monk]] of the so-called "[[Southern School]]" of [[Zen]] and the [[dharma heir]] of [[Huineng]]. | [[Heze Shenhui]] ({{Wiki|Chinese}}:[[菏泽神會/神会]]; Wade–Giles: [[Shen-hui]]; [[Japanese]]: [[Kataku Jinne]], 670-762) was a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist monk]] of the so-called "[[Southern School]]" of [[Zen]] and the [[dharma heir]] of [[Huineng]]. | ||
− | [[Shenhui]] is notable for his strident attacks on [[Yuquan Shenxiu]] and the associated "[[Northern School]]", which was the most prominent branch of [[Zen Buddhism]] in [[China]] at the [[time]]. He accused them of {{Wiki|propagating}} [[gradual]] teachings, as opposed to his own [[sudden teachings]]. | + | [[Shenhui]] is notable for his strident attacks on [[Yuquan Shenxiu]] and the associated "[[Northern School]]", which was the most prominent branch of [[Zen Buddhism]] in [[China]] at the [[time]]. He accused them of {{Wiki|propagating}} [[gradual]] teachings, as opposed to his [[own]] [[sudden teachings]]. |
− | [[Shenhui's]] own [[lineage]], called the [[Heze]] [[lineage]] ([[菏泽宗]]), probably [[died]] out around the [[time]] of the {{Wiki|Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution}} in 845, with [[Guifeng Zongmi]] {{Wiki|being}} the only notable [[monk]] in the [[lineage]]. | + | [[Shenhui's]] [[own]] [[lineage]], called the [[Heze]] [[lineage]] ([[菏泽宗]]), probably [[died]] out around the [[time]] of the {{Wiki|Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution}} in 845, with [[Guifeng Zongmi]] {{Wiki|being}} the only notable [[monk]] in the [[lineage]]. |
{{Wiki|Biography}} | {{Wiki|Biography}} | ||
Line 19: | Line 28: | ||
[[Shenhui]] then says, "It is the source of all things. It is the [[buddha nature]] of [[Shenhui]]". | [[Shenhui]] then says, "It is the source of all things. It is the [[buddha nature]] of [[Shenhui]]". | ||
[[Huineng]] responds, "I said it has no [[name]] and no [[name]] and no description. How can you say it is the source of [[buddha nature]]?" | [[Huineng]] responds, "I said it has no [[name]] and no [[name]] and no description. How can you say it is the source of [[buddha nature]]?" | ||
− | [[Shenhui]] then bows and returns to his seat, but [[Huineng]] then proclaims, "In the {{Wiki|future}} if this youngster heads a [[monastery]], it will certainly bring forth fully [[realized]] [[disciples]] of our school". | + | [[Shenhui]] then [[bows]] and returns to his seat, but [[Huineng]] then proclaims, "In the {{Wiki|future}} if this youngster heads a [[monastery]], it will certainly bring forth fully [[realized]] [[disciples]] of our school". |
[[Shenhui]] later went to {{Wiki|Changan}} to receive [[ordination]]. | [[Shenhui]] later went to {{Wiki|Changan}} to receive [[ordination]]. | ||
− | In his writings and lectures [[Shenhui]] attacked what he called the "[[Northern School]]" of [[Zen]]. Despite his attacks on the [[Northern School]], [[Shenhui]] traveled {{Wiki|north}} to [[live]] amongst his ideological enemies in the {{Wiki|capital}} city of {{Wiki|Luoyang}}. While in the city he spoke publicly against the teachings of the [[Northern School]]. | + | In his writings and lectures [[Shenhui]] attacked what he called the "[[Northern School]]" of [[Zen]]. Despite his attacks on the [[Northern School]], [[Shenhui]] traveled {{Wiki|north}} to [[live]] amongst his {{Wiki|ideological}} enemies in the {{Wiki|capital}} city of {{Wiki|Luoyang}}. While in the city he spoke publicly against the teachings of the [[Northern School]]. |
[[Shenhui]] was a highly successful fundraiser for the government despite his [[criticism]] of [[Shenxiu]] for having governmental ties. During the {{Wiki|An Lushan}} Rebellion rebellion, [[monks]] were asked to lecture, and sell certificates to the public in [[order]] to raise [[money]] for the counteroffensive. [[Shenhui]] was active in this endeavor in {{Wiki|Luoyang}}, and reportedly very effective.:36:107 Despite this, he was eventually banished from the city for stirring up trouble. | [[Shenhui]] was a highly successful fundraiser for the government despite his [[criticism]] of [[Shenxiu]] for having governmental ties. During the {{Wiki|An Lushan}} Rebellion rebellion, [[monks]] were asked to lecture, and sell certificates to the public in [[order]] to raise [[money]] for the counteroffensive. [[Shenhui]] was active in this endeavor in {{Wiki|Luoyang}}, and reportedly very effective.:36:107 Despite this, he was eventually banished from the city for stirring up trouble. | ||
− | [[Shenhui]] was said to have [[died]] while [[meditating]] in 760. His burial [[stupa]] is located at [[Longmen Grottoes]]. One of his extant writings is Xianzongji (显宗记). | + | [[Shenhui]] was said to have [[died]] while [[meditating]] in 760. His burial [[stupa]] is located at [[Longmen Grottoes]]. One of his extant writings is Xianzongji ([[显宗记]]). |
Attack on [[Shenxiu]] and the "[[Northern School]]" | Attack on [[Shenxiu]] and the "[[Northern School]]" | ||
[[Shenxiu's]] attack | [[Shenxiu's]] attack | ||
Line 38: | Line 47: | ||
The Record of the [[Zen]] [[Discourses]] of the [[Monk]] [[Shenhui]] quotes [[Shenhui]]: | The Record of the [[Zen]] [[Discourses]] of the [[Monk]] [[Shenhui]] quotes [[Shenhui]]: | ||
− | + | ([[Northern School]] teachings] are the [[methods]] of the [[ignorant]]. [[Zen master]] [[Huineng's]] practice is found apart from the two [[methods]] of 'subduing' or 'not subduing' the [[mind]]. This is why it says in the [[sutra]], '[[mind]] does not abide within, nor is it {{Wiki|external}}'. It is in quiet sitting. When one sits in this [[manner]], one realizes [[buddhahood]]. In the six generations that have come before, not a single [[person]] performed the practices of [[Shenxiu]]. They are entirely different. | |
− | In addition to these claims, [[Shenhui]] further alleged that [[Shenxiu's]] teachings deviated from [[Zen]] in their emphasis on {{Wiki|ceremony}} and [[sutra]] study, rather than [[seated meditation]] and no-mind. He also accused "[[Northern School]]" students of tryiing to steal [[Bodhidharma’s]] robe, to sever the {{Wiki|head}} of [[Huineng’s]] mummy, and to rewrite the inscription on [[Shenxiu’s]] tomb with the words "Sixth Patriarch".:28-29:113-114 | + | In addition to these claims, [[Shenhui]] further alleged that [[Shenxiu's]] teachings deviated from [[Zen]] in their {{Wiki|emphasis}} on {{Wiki|ceremony}} and [[sutra]] study, rather than [[seated meditation]] and no-mind. He also accused "[[Northern School]]" students of tryiing to steal [[Bodhidharma’s]] robe, to sever the {{Wiki|head}} of [[Huineng’s]] mummy, and to rewrite the inscription on [[Shenxiu’s]] tomb with the words "Sixth Patriarch".:28-29:113-114 |
Historical {{Wiki|analysis}} of [[Shenhui's]] attack | Historical {{Wiki|analysis}} of [[Shenhui's]] attack | ||
Several [[scholars]] consider [[Shenhui's]] arguments against the "[[Northern School]]" to be [[fabrications]] or exaggerations. Heinrich [[Dumoulin]], commenting on [[Shenhui's]] accusations, wrote that [[Shenhui]] was "unscrupulous", while [[Ui Hakuju]] wrote that he had "“traits deserving of [[moral]] censure and [[criticism]] for intolerance”.:113-114 | Several [[scholars]] consider [[Shenhui's]] arguments against the "[[Northern School]]" to be [[fabrications]] or exaggerations. Heinrich [[Dumoulin]], commenting on [[Shenhui's]] accusations, wrote that [[Shenhui]] was "unscrupulous", while [[Ui Hakuju]] wrote that he had "“traits deserving of [[moral]] censure and [[criticism]] for intolerance”.:113-114 | ||
− | [[Scholars]] such as Philip Yampolsky have suggested that one of his [[disciples]] may have written the [[Platform Sutra]], which glorifies [[Huineng]] and "[[sudden enlightenment]] while deriding [[Shenxiu]]. | + | [[Scholars]] such as Philip [[Yampolsky]] have suggested that one of his [[disciples]] may have written the [[Platform Sutra]], which glorifies [[Huineng]] and "[[sudden enlightenment]] while deriding [[Shenxiu]]. |
[[Scholars]] note that both the {{Wiki|concept}} of a "[[patriarch]]" and the possession of the robe of [[Bodhidharma]] {{Wiki|being}} the indicator of this [[person]] probably arose as a result of [[Shenhui's]] diatribes. In fact, according to the [[Platform Sutra]], [[Huineng]] himself did not pass on the robe, nor did he [[name]] a "[[patriarch]]" to replace him. Rather, like his [[teacher]] [[Hongren]], he had many [[disciples]] who went on to teach [[Zen]]. | [[Scholars]] note that both the {{Wiki|concept}} of a "[[patriarch]]" and the possession of the robe of [[Bodhidharma]] {{Wiki|being}} the indicator of this [[person]] probably arose as a result of [[Shenhui's]] diatribes. In fact, according to the [[Platform Sutra]], [[Huineng]] himself did not pass on the robe, nor did he [[name]] a "[[patriarch]]" to replace him. Rather, like his [[teacher]] [[Hongren]], he had many [[disciples]] who went on to teach [[Zen]]. | ||
− | Philip Yampolsky wrote that [[Shenhui's]] claim that the [[Diamond Sutra]] and not the [[Lankavatara Sutra]] was the paramount [[sutra]] of [[Bodhidharma]] and his [[disciples]] was "[[pure]] fabrication".:34 | + | Philip [[Yampolsky]] wrote that [[Shenhui's]] claim that the [[Diamond Sutra]] and not the [[Lankavatara Sutra]] was the paramount [[sutra]] of [[Bodhidharma]] and his [[disciples]] was "[[pure]] fabrication".:34 |
Influence | Influence | ||
Line 56: | Line 65: | ||
The record of that [[time]] was indeed {{Wiki|excellent}}. Today, if we point to a greatly [[awakened]] school, it is the [[Heze]] school. | The record of that [[time]] was indeed {{Wiki|excellent}}. Today, if we point to a greatly [[awakened]] school, it is the [[Heze]] school. | ||
− | [[Shenhui's]] own [[lineage]], called the [[Heze]] school, probably [[died]] out around the [[time]] of the {{Wiki|Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution}} in 845. His best-known descendant in this school was [[Guifeng Zongmi]], who was also the [[fifth patriarch]] of the [[Huayan school]]. According to [[Tsung-mi]], [[Shen-hui's]] approach was officially sanctioned in 796, when "an {{Wiki|imperial}} commission determined that the Southern line of [[Ch'an]] represented the {{Wiki|orthodox}} [[transmission]] and established [[Shen-hui]] as the [[seventh patriarch]], placing an inscription to that effect in the shen-lung [[temple]]". | + | [[Shenhui's]] [[own]] [[lineage]], called the [[Heze]] school, probably [[died]] out around the [[time]] of the {{Wiki|Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution}} in 845. His best-known descendant in this school was [[Guifeng Zongmi]], who was also the [[fifth patriarch]] of the [[Huayan school]]. According to [[Tsung-mi]], [[Shen-hui's]] approach was officially sanctioned in 796, when "an {{Wiki|imperial}} commission determined that the Southern line of [[Ch'an]] represented the {{Wiki|orthodox}} [[transmission]] and established [[Shen-hui]] as the [[seventh patriarch]], placing an inscription to that effect in the [[shen-lung]] [[temple]]". |
− | [[Shenhui's]] {{Wiki|distinction}} between "[[gradual]]" versus "sudden" methods of [[enlightenment]] became a hallmark of [[Chinese Zen]]. [[Mazu Daoyi]], whose [[Hongzhou school]] became the hallmark of [[Zen]], was an early and important adopter of the "sudden" approach. | + | [[Shenhui's]] {{Wiki|distinction}} between "[[gradual]]" versus "sudden" [[methods]] of [[enlightenment]] became a hallmark of [[Chinese Zen]]. [[Mazu Daoyi]], whose [[Hongzhou school]] became the hallmark of [[Zen]], was an early and important adopter of the "sudden" approach. |
His speeches was found again in [[Dunhuang]]. | His speeches was found again in [[Dunhuang]]. |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 26 December 2023
Heze Shenhui (Chinese:菏泽神會/神会; Wade–Giles: Shen-hui; Japanese: Kataku Jinne, 670-762) was a Chinese Buddhist monk of the so-called "Southern School" of Zen and the dharma heir of Huineng.
Shenhui is notable for his strident attacks on Yuquan Shenxiu and the associated "Northern School", which was the most prominent branch of Zen Buddhism in China at the time. He accused them of propagating gradual teachings, as opposed to his own sudden teachings.
Shenhui's own lineage, called the Heze lineage (菏泽宗), probably died out around the time of the Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution in 845, with Guifeng Zongmi being the only notable monk in the lineage.
Biography
Shenhui was born in Xiangyang with the surname Gao (高). He learned The Five Classics of Confucius and the philosophy of Laozi and Zhuangzi at a young age.
At the age of 14 he became a monk under Huineng, a disciple of Hongren and the founder of the Southern School of Zen. For a time Shenhui served as his attendant.
Several extant stories relate encounters between Huineng and Shenhui. In one, Huineng says to his students,
I have something which has no head or tail. It is nameless and can't be described. It has no back and no front. Do any of you know what this is?"
Shenhui then says, "It is the source of all things. It is the buddha nature of Shenhui".
Huineng responds, "I said it has no name and no name and no description. How can you say it is the source of buddha nature?"
Shenhui then bows and returns to his seat, but Huineng then proclaims, "In the future if this youngster heads a monastery, it will certainly bring forth fully realized disciples of our school".
Shenhui later went to Changan to receive ordination.
In his writings and lectures Shenhui attacked what he called the "Northern School" of Zen. Despite his attacks on the Northern School, Shenhui traveled north to live amongst his ideological enemies in the capital city of Luoyang. While in the city he spoke publicly against the teachings of the Northern School.
Shenhui was a highly successful fundraiser for the government despite his criticism of Shenxiu for having governmental ties. During the An Lushan Rebellion rebellion, monks were asked to lecture, and sell certificates to the public in order to raise money for the counteroffensive. Shenhui was active in this endeavor in Luoyang, and reportedly very effective.:36:107 Despite this, he was eventually banished from the city for stirring up trouble.
Shenhui was said to have died while meditating in 760. His burial stupa is located at Longmen Grottoes. One of his extant writings is Xianzongji (显宗记).
Attack on Shenxiu and the "Northern School"
Shenxiu's attack
At the Great Dharma Assembly in Henan Province in 732 he coined this term:240 in order to deride Shenxiu's school. Here he claimed that Shenxiu tried to usurp the title of Sixth Patriarch from Huineng. He supported his claims by stating that Huineng possessed the robe of Bodhidharma, the First Patriarch of Zen.
Another attack was staged at the Great Cloud Temple in Huatai in 734. He delivered a talk titled the Exposition on Right and Wrong in regards to Bodhidharma's Southern School. It was presented in the form of a discussion between him and a monk named Chongyuan, who took the side of Shenxiu's Northern School. Shenhui used the opportunity to question Shenxiu's legitimacy as Hongren's successor.
Most memorably, however, he accused the Northern School of advocating "gradual" and not "sudde enlightenment.:111
The Record of the Zen Discourses of the Monk Shenhui quotes Shenhui:
(Northern School teachings] are the methods of the ignorant. Zen master Huineng's practice is found apart from the two methods of 'subduing' or 'not subduing' the mind. This is why it says in the sutra, 'mind does not abide within, nor is it external'. It is in quiet sitting. When one sits in this manner, one realizes buddhahood. In the six generations that have come before, not a single person performed the practices of Shenxiu. They are entirely different.
In addition to these claims, Shenhui further alleged that Shenxiu's teachings deviated from Zen in their emphasis on ceremony and sutra study, rather than seated meditation and no-mind. He also accused "Northern School" students of tryiing to steal Bodhidharma’s robe, to sever the head of Huineng’s mummy, and to rewrite the inscription on Shenxiu’s tomb with the words "Sixth Patriarch".:28-29:113-114
Historical analysis of Shenhui's attack
Several scholars consider Shenhui's arguments against the "Northern School" to be fabrications or exaggerations. Heinrich Dumoulin, commenting on Shenhui's accusations, wrote that Shenhui was "unscrupulous", while Ui Hakuju wrote that he had "“traits deserving of moral censure and criticism for intolerance”.:113-114
Scholars such as Philip Yampolsky have suggested that one of his disciples may have written the Platform Sutra, which glorifies Huineng and "sudden enlightenment while deriding Shenxiu.
Scholars note that both the concept of a "patriarch" and the possession of the robe of Bodhidharma being the indicator of this person probably arose as a result of Shenhui's diatribes. In fact, according to the Platform Sutra, Huineng himself did not pass on the robe, nor did he name a "patriarch" to replace him. Rather, like his teacher Hongren, he had many disciples who went on to teach Zen.
Philip Yampolsky wrote that Shenhui's claim that the Diamond Sutra and not the Lankavatara Sutra was the paramount sutra of Bodhidharma and his disciples was "pure fabrication".:34
Influence
In the early 10th century, the founder of the Fayan School commented on Shenhui's lineage:
The record of that time was indeed excellent. Today, if we point to a greatly awakened school, it is the Heze school.
Shenhui's own lineage, called the Heze school, probably died out around the time of the Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution in 845. His best-known descendant in this school was Guifeng Zongmi, who was also the fifth patriarch of the Huayan school. According to Tsung-mi, Shen-hui's approach was officially sanctioned in 796, when "an imperial commission determined that the Southern line of Ch'an represented the orthodox transmission and established Shen-hui as the seventh patriarch, placing an inscription to that effect in the shen-lung temple".
Shenhui's distinction between "gradual" versus "sudden" methods of enlightenment became a hallmark of Chinese Zen. Mazu Daoyi, whose Hongzhou school became the hallmark of Zen, was an early and important adopter of the "sudden" approach.
His speeches was found again in Dunhuang.