Difference between revisions of "Triratna Buddhist Community"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Fwbologo.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:Fwbologo.jpg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | The founder, Sangharakshita, described meditation as having four phases. The first two according to his system ('integration' and 'positive emotion', can be correlated to the traditional category of "calming" "samatha" practices, and the last two (spiritual death and spiritual rebirth) can be correlated to "insight" or "vipassana" practices. For those not ordained into the Triratna Buddhist Order, the practices associated with the first two are emphasised, though the spirit of the last two is also taught. | + | The '''[[Triratna Buddhist Community]]''' (formerly the [[Friends of the Western Buddhist Order]] ([[FWBO]])) is an international fellowship of [[Buddhists]], and others who aspire to its [[path]] of [[mindfulness]], under the [[leadership]] of the [[Triratna Buddhist Order]] (formerly the [[Western Buddhist Order]]). It was founded by [[Sangharakshita]] in the UK in 1967, and describes itself as "an international network dedicated to communicating [[Buddhist]] [[truths]] in ways appropriate to the {{Wiki|modern}} [[world]]". In keeping with [[Buddhist traditions]], it also pays [[attention]] to contemporary [[ideas]], particularly drawn from {{Wiki|Western philosophy}}, {{Wiki|psychotherapy}}, and [[art]]. |
+ | |||
+ | Worldwide, more than 100 groups are affiliated with the {{Wiki|community}}, [[including]] in [[North America]], {{Wiki|Australasia}} and {{Wiki|Europe}}. In the UK, it is one of the largest [[Buddhist movements]], with some 30 urban centres and [[retreat]] centres. Its largest following, however, is in [[India]], where it is known as [[Triratna]] [[Bauddha]] [[Mahāsaṅgha]] (TBM) (formerly the [[Trailokya]] [[Bauddha]] [[Mahasangha]] Sahayak Gana). | ||
+ | |||
+ | The {{Wiki|community}} has been described as "perhaps the most successful attempt to create an {{Wiki|ecumenical}} international [[Buddhist organization]]," and "an important contributor to [[Buddhism]] on the [[world]] stage." It has also been criticised, most notably for lacking "[[spiritual lineage]]" and over claims of {{Wiki|sexual}} exploitation and misogyny during the 1970s and 1980s." | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Practices and [[activities]]== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Meditation]] is the common thread through [[activities]]. Order members teach two practices: (a) "The [[mindfulness of breathing]]" ([[anapanasati]]), in which practitioners focus on the rise and fall of the [[breath]]; and (b) "The [[metta bhavana]]", which approximately translates from the original [[Pali]] as "the [[cultivation]] of [[lovingkindness]]". These practices are felt to be complementary in promoting [[equanimity]] and [[friendliness]] towards others. Some friends of the Order may have little, if any, other involvement in its [[activities]]; but [[friendship]], [[Sangha]], and {{Wiki|community}} are encouraged at all levels as [[essential]] contexts for [[meditation]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The founder, [[Sangharakshita]], described [[meditation]] as having four phases. The first two according to his system ('{{Wiki|integration}}' and 'positive [[emotion]]', can be correlated to the [[traditional]] category of "[[calming]]" "[[samatha]]" practices, and the last two ([[spiritual]] [[death]] and [[spiritual]] [[rebirth]]) can be correlated to "[[insight]]" or "[[vipassana]]" practices. For those not [[ordained]] into the [[Triratna Buddhist Order]], the practices associated with the first two are emphasised, though the [[spirit]] of the last two is also [[taught]]. | ||
These phases are: | These phases are: | ||
− | ::1.'''Integration'''. The main practice at this stage is the mindfulness of breathing, which is intended to have the effect ::of "integrating the psyche" – improving mindfulness and concentration, and reducing psychological conflict. | + | ::1.'''Integration'''. The main practice at this stage is the [[mindfulness of breathing]], which is intended to have the effect ::of "integrating the [[Wikipedia:Psyche (psychology)|psyche]]" – improving [[mindfulness]] and [[concentration]], and reducing [[psychological]] conflict. |
− | ::2.'''Positive emotion'''. The second aspect of samatha is developing positivity – an other-regarding, life-affirming ::attitude. The Brahmavihara meditations, especially the 'metta bhavana' or cultivation of loving kindness meditations, are ::the key practices intended to foster the development of positive emotion. | + | ::2.'''Positive [[emotion]]'''. The second aspect of [[samatha]] is developing positivity – an other-regarding, life-affirming ::[[attitude]]. The [[Brahmavihara]] [[meditations]], especially the '[[metta bhavana]]' or [[cultivation]] of [[loving kindness]] [[meditations]], are ::the key practices intended to foster the [[development]] of positive [[emotion]]. |
− | ::3.'''Spiritual death'''. The next stage is to develop insight into what is seen to be the emptiness of the self and reality. ::Meditations at this stage include considering the elements of which self and world are thought to be composed; contemplating ::impermance (particularly of the body); contemplating suffering; and contemplating sunyata. | + | ::3.'''Spiritual [[death]]'''. The next stage is to develop [[insight]] into what is seen to be the [[emptiness]] of the [[self]] and [[reality]]. ::[[Meditations]] at this stage include considering the [[elements]] of which [[self]] and [[world]] are [[thought]] to be composed; contemplating ::impermance (particularly of the [[body]]); contemplating [[suffering]]; and contemplating [[sunyata]]. |
− | ::.4'''Spiritual rebirth'''. The WBO teaches that, with the development of insight and the death of the limited ego-self, a ::person is spiritually reborn. Practices which involve the visualization of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are among the main ::practices in this phase. At ordination, each dharmachari(ni) is given an advanced visualisation meditation on a particular ::figure. | + | ::.4'''Spiritual [[rebirth]]'''. The [[WBO]] teaches that, with the [[development of insight]] and the [[death]] of the limited ego-self, a ::[[person]] is [[spiritually]] [[reborn]]. Practices which involve the [[visualization]] of [[Buddhas]] and [[Bodhisattvas]] are among the main ::practices in this phase. At [[ordination]], each dharmachari(ni) is given an advanced [[visualisation]] [[meditation]] on a particular ::figure. |
− | Centres also teach scripture, yoga and other methods of self-improvement, some of which are felt by some commentators to come from outside the Buddhist tradition. Recently, community activities have begun to include outdoor festivals, online meditation courses, arts festivals, poetry and writing workshops, tai chi, karate, and pilgrimages to Buddhist holy sites in India. For many years, the community charity Karuna Trust (UK) has raised money for aid projects in India. | + | Centres also teach [[scripture]], [[yoga]] and other methods of self-improvement, some of which are felt by some commentators to come from outside the [[Buddhist tradition]]. Recently, {{Wiki|community}} [[activities]] have begun to include outdoor {{Wiki|festivals}}, online [[meditation]] courses, [[arts]] {{Wiki|festivals}}, [[poetry]] and [[writing]] workshops, [[tai chi]], [[karate]], and [[pilgrimages]] to [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|holy}} sites in [[India]]. For many years, the {{Wiki|community}} [[charity]] [[Karuna]] [[Trust]] (UK) has raised [[money]] for aid projects in [[India]]. |
− | As among Buddhists generally, Puja is a ritual practice at some events, intended to awaken the desire to liberate all beings from suffering. The most common ritual consists of a puja, derived and adapted from the Bodhicaryavatara of Shantideva. | + | As among [[Buddhists]] generally, [[Puja]] is a [[ritual practice]] at some events, intended to [[awaken]] the [[desire]] to {{Wiki|liberate}} all [[beings]] from [[suffering]]. The most common [[ritual]] consists of a [[puja]], derived and adapted from the [[Bodhicaryavatara]] of [[Shantideva]]. |
− | Retreats provide a chance to focus on meditational practice more intensely, in a residential context outside of a retreatant's everyday life. community retreats can be broadly categorised into meditation retreats, study retreats, and solitary retreats. Retreat lengths vary from short weekends to one or two weeks. | + | [[Retreats]] provide a chance to focus on [[meditational practice]] more intensely, in a residential context outside of a retreatant's everyday [[life]]. {{Wiki|community}} [[retreats]] can be broadly categorised into [[meditation retreats]], study [[retreats]], and [[solitary retreats]]. [[Retreat]] lengths vary from short weekends to one or two weeks. |
− | Businesses, said to operate to the principle of "right livelihood", generate funds for the movement, as well seeking to provide environments for spiritual growth through employment. Emphasis is placed on teamwork, and on contributing to the welfare of others: for example by funding social projects and by considering ethical matters such as fair trade. The largest community business is Windhorse:Evolution, a gift wholesaling business and a chain of gift shops. | + | Businesses, said to operate to the [[principle]] of "[[right livelihood]]", generate funds for the {{Wiki|movement}}, as well seeking to provide environments for [[spiritual]] growth through employment. Emphasis is placed on teamwork, and on contributing to the {{Wiki|welfare}} of others: for example by funding {{Wiki|social}} projects and by considering [[ethical]] matters such as fair trade. The largest {{Wiki|community}} business is Windhorse:Evolution, a [[gift]] wholesaling business and a chain of [[gift]] shops. |
− | Many cities with a Triratna centre also have a residential community. The first of these was formed after a retreat where some participants wanted to continue retreat-style living. Since it was felt that the most stable communities tended to be single sex, this has become the paradigm for communities. Support from fellow practitioners in a community is seen to be effective in helping members make spiritual progress. | + | Many cities with a [[Triratna]] centre also have a residential {{Wiki|community}}. The first of these was formed after a [[retreat]] where some participants wanted to continue retreat-style living. Since it was felt that the most {{Wiki|stable}} communities tended to be single {{Wiki|sex}}, this has become the [[paradigm]] for communities. Support from fellow practitioners in a {{Wiki|community}} is seen to be effective in helping members make [[spiritual]] progress. |
− | The largest TBC centre in the UK is the London Buddhist Centre in Bethnal Green, East London, which offers drop-in lunchtime meditation sessions each weekday, open to beginners, as well as courses and classes through the week. The centre's courses for depression, based on the mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy methodology of Jon Kabat-Zinn at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, featured in the Financial Times in 2008. This initiative is supported by the local authority, the London borough of Tower Hamlets. The Times has also reported on the centre's work with those affected by alcohol dependency | + | The largest TBC centre in the UK is the [[London]] [[Buddhist]] Centre in Bethnal [[Green]], [[East]] [[London]], which offers drop-in lunchtime [[meditation]] sessions each weekday, open to beginners, as well as courses and classes through the [[week]]. The centre's courses for {{Wiki|depression}}, based on the mindfulness-based [[Wikipedia:cognition|cognitive]] {{Wiki|behavioral}} therapy [[Wikipedia:scientific method|methodology]] of [[Jon Kabat-Zinn]] at the {{Wiki|University}} of {{Wiki|Massachusetts}} Amherst, featured in the Financial Times in 2008. This initiative is supported by the local authority, the [[London]] borough of Tower Hamlets. The Times has also reported on the centre's work with those affected by [[alcohol]] [[dependency]] |
− | ==Defining the movement== | + | ==Defining the {{Wiki|movement}}== |
− | According to the community, six characteristics define it: | + | According to the {{Wiki|community}}, six [[characteristics]] define it: |
− | ::1.'''An ecumenical movement'''. It is not identified with any particular strand or school of Buddhism, but draws inspiration ::from many. It calls itself "ecumenical" rather than "eclectic" because it is founded on the premise that there is an ::underlying unity to all schools. | + | ::1.'''An {{Wiki|ecumenical}} {{Wiki|movement}}'''. It is not identified with any particular strand or school of [[Buddhism]], but draws inspiration ::from many. It calls itself "{{Wiki|ecumenical}}" rather than "eclectic" because it is founded on the premise that there is an ::underlying {{Wiki|unity}} to all schools. |
− | ::2.'''"Going for refuge" is central'''. "Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels" – meaning the Buddha, the Dharma, and the ::Sangha – is considered to be what makes someone a Buddhist | + | ::2.'''"Going for [[refuge]]" is central'''. "[[Going for Refuge]] to the [[Three Jewels]]" – meaning the [[Buddha]], the [[Dharma]], and the ::[[Sangha]] – is considered to be what makes someone a [[Buddhist]] |
− | ::3.'''A unified Order'''. Unlike some sangha, the community does not propagate a monastic lineage. Sangharakshita devised a ::non-monastic ordination system, whilst also allowing the undertaking of the "anagarika" precept which enjoins celibacy. ::Identical ordination is open to both sexes. While the movement regards single-sex activities as important to spiritual ::growth, men and women are recognised as being equally able to practice and develop spiritually. | + | ::3.'''A unified Order'''. Unlike some [[sangha]], the {{Wiki|community}} does not propagate a [[monastic]] [[lineage]]. [[Sangharakshita]] devised a ::[[non-monastic]] [[ordination]] system, whilst also allowing the {{Wiki|undertaking}} of the "[[anagarika]]" [[precept]] which enjoins [[celibacy]]. ::Identical [[ordination]] is open to both sexes. While the {{Wiki|movement}} regards single-sex [[activities]] as important to [[spiritual]] ::growth, men and women are recognised as being equally able to practice and develop [[spiritually]]. |
− | ::4.'''An emphasis on spiritual friendship'''. There is a strong emphasis on the sangha, and spiritual friendship based on ::shared values. The community teaches that spending time with friends who share ideals, and engaging in ritual practice with ::them, supports ethical living and the arising of the bodhicitta. | + | ::4.'''An {{Wiki|emphasis}} on [[spiritual friendship]]'''. There is a strong {{Wiki|emphasis}} on the [[sangha]], and [[spiritual friendship]] based on ::shared values. The {{Wiki|community}} teaches that spending time with friends who share ideals, and engaging in [[ritual practice]] with ::them, supports [[ethical]] living and the [[arising]] of the [[bodhicitta]]. |
− | ::5.'''Teamwork. Working together in teams''', in the spirit of generosity and with a focus on ethics, is considered a ::transformative spiritual practice. | + | ::5.'''Teamwork. Working together in teams''', in the [[spirit]] of [[generosity]] and with a focus on [[ethics]], is considered a ::transformative [[spiritual practice]]. |
− | ::6.'''Importance of art'''. Engagement in, and an appreciation of, the arts are considered to be a valuable aspect of ::spiritual practice. The community teaches that a refinement of one's artistic tastes can help refine emotional sensitivity ::and provide a channel for the expression of right living, and spiritual growth. More broadly, the movement seeks ways to ::re-express Buddhism by making connections with sympathetic elements in the surrounding culture, regarding the arts as such ::an aspect of western culture. | + | ::6.'''Importance of [[art]]'''. Engagement in, and an [[appreciation]] of, the [[arts]] are considered to be a valuable aspect of ::[[spiritual practice]]. The {{Wiki|community}} teaches that a refinement of one's artistic {{Wiki|tastes}} can help refine [[emotional]] sensitivity ::and provide a [[channel]] for the expression of [[right living]], and [[spiritual]] growth. More broadly, the {{Wiki|movement}} seeks ways to ::re-express [[Buddhism]] by making connections with sympathetic [[elements]] in the surrounding {{Wiki|culture}}, regarding the [[arts]] as such ::an aspect of {{Wiki|western culture}}. |
− | "The FWBO's attitude to spreading the Dharma is one of heartfelt urgency," wrote Stephen Batchelor, a prominent British Buddhist author, in a book published in 1994. "For the FWBO, Western Society as such needs to be subject to the unflinching scrutiny of Buddhist values." | + | "The FWBO's [[attitude]] to spreading the [[Dharma]] is one of heartfelt urgency," wrote [[Stephen Batchelor]], a prominent [[British]] [[Buddhist]] author, in a [[book]] published in 1994. "For the [[FWBO]], [[Western]] [[Society]] as such needs to be [[subject]] to the unflinching {{Wiki|scrutiny}} of [[Buddhist]] values." |
− | ==The Triratna Buddhist Order== | + | ==The [[Triratna Buddhist Order]]== |
− | The Triratna Buddhist Order is the focal-point of the community, and is a network of friendships between individuals who have made personal commitments to the Buddha, the dharma and the sangha, in communion with others. Members are known as dharmacharis (masculine) or dharmacharinis (feminine), and are ordained in accord with a ceremony formulated by the founder. At ordination they are given a religious name in Pali or Sanskrit. While there is an informal hierarchy within the order, there are no higher ordinations. A small number of members, however, take vows of celibacy and adopt a simpler lifestyle. Contrary to the traditional Buddhist structure of separating lay and monastic members, the order combines monastic and lay lifestyles under one ordination, a practice not dissimilar to that which evolved in some Japanese schools of Buddhism. | + | The [[Triratna Buddhist Order]] is the focal-point of the {{Wiki|community}}, and is a network of friendships between {{Wiki|individuals}} who have made personal [[commitments]] to the [[Buddha]], the [[dharma]] and the [[sangha]], in communion with others. Members are known as dharmacharis ({{Wiki|masculine}}) or dharmacharinis ({{Wiki|feminine}}), and are [[ordained]] in accord with a {{Wiki|ceremony}} formulated by the founder. At [[ordination]] they are given a [[religious]] [[name]] in [[Pali]] or [[Sanskrit]]. While there is an informal {{Wiki|hierarchy}} within the order, there are no higher [[ordinations]]. A small number of members, however, take [[vows of celibacy]] and adopt a simpler [[lifestyle]]. Contrary to the [[traditional]] [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|structure}} of separating lay and [[monastic]] members, the order combines [[monastic]] and lay lifestyles under one [[ordination]], a practice not dissimilar to that which evolved in some [[Japanese]] [[schools of Buddhism]]. |
− | As with followers of the Shingon school of Buddhism, order members observe ten precepts (ethical training rules). These precepts are different from monastic vows and do not appear in the Vinaya Pitaka, but were formulated on the basis of the so-called "dasa-kusala-dhammas" (ten wholesome actions). These are found in several places in the Pāli Canon, as well as in some Sanskrit sources. The karma sections of the fundamental meditation texts of all four schools of Tibetan Buddhism also list these acts as basic guidelines for lay or ordained practitioners intent on observing the law of cause and effect. | + | As with followers of the [[Shingon school]] of [[Buddhism]], order members observe [[ten precepts]] ([[ethical]] [[training rules]]). These [[precepts]] are different from [[monastic vows]] and do not appear in the [[Vinaya Pitaka]], but were formulated on the basis of the so-called "dasa-kusala-dhammas" ([[ten wholesome actions]]). These are found in several places in the [[Pāli Canon]], as well as in some [[Sanskrit]] sources. The [[karma]] [[sections]] of the fundamental [[meditation]] texts of all [[four schools of Tibetan Buddhism]] also list these acts as basic guidelines for lay or [[ordained]] practitioners intent on observing the [[law of cause and effect]]. |
− | Beyond this, a commitment to personal dharma practice and to remain in communication with other members are the only expectations. Ordination confers no special status, nor any specific responsibilities, although many order members choose to take on responsibilities for such things as teaching meditation and dharma. In mid-2008, there were around 1,500 members of the order, in more than 20 countries. | + | Beyond this, a commitment to personal [[dharma practice]] and to remain in [[communication]] with other members are the only expectations. [[Ordination]] confers no special {{Wiki|status}}, nor any specific responsibilities, although many order members choose to take on responsibilities for such things as [[teaching]] [[meditation]] and [[dharma]]. In mid-2008, there were around 1,500 members of the order, in more than 20 countries. |
− | ==The wider community== | + | ==The wider {{Wiki|community}}== |
− | In the Triratna community, as in the Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions, sangha is interpreted as the Buddhist community as a whole. Someone who regularly attends community activities is considered to be a "friend". Friends do not have to regard themselves as Buddhists, and can be of any faith, or none. Some choose, after some time, to participate in a formal ceremony of affiliation, and thus become a "mitra." "Mitra" is Sanskrit for "friend", which in this case denotes a person who considers themselves Buddhist, who makes an effort to live in accordance with the five ethical precepts, and who feels that this spiritual community is the appropriate one for them. | + | In the [[Triratna]] {{Wiki|community}}, as in the [[Theravada]], [[Mahayana]] and [[Vajrayana traditions]], [[sangha]] is interpreted as the [[Buddhist community]] as a whole. Someone who regularly attends {{Wiki|community}} [[activities]] is considered to be a "[[friend]]". Friends do not have to regard themselves as [[Buddhists]], and can be of any [[faith]], or none. Some choose, after some time, to participate in a formal {{Wiki|ceremony}} of affiliation, and thus become a "[[mitra]]." "[[Mitra]]" is [[Sanskrit]] for "[[friend]]", which in this case denotes a [[person]] who considers themselves [[Buddhist]], who makes an [[effort]] to live in accordance with the five [[ethical]] [[precepts]], and who [[feels]] that this [[spiritual community]] is the appropriate one for them. |
− | Those who wish to join the order must request this in writing. It can then sometimes take several years to prepare for ordination. This is an informal process, the focus of which is to deepen one's commitment. | + | Those who wish to join the order must request this in [[writing]]. It can then sometimes take several years to prepare for [[ordination]]. This is an informal process, the focus of which is to deepen one's commitment. |
− | Some friends, mitras and order members decide, at least for a while, to study teachings from outside the community, including non-Buddhist traditions such as Sufism. | + | Some friends, mitras and order members decide, at least for a while, to study teachings from outside the {{Wiki|community}}, [[including]] [[non-Buddhist]] [[traditions]] such as [[Sufism]]. |
==History== | ==History== | ||
− | As the Friends of the Western Buddhist Order, the community was founded in London in April 1967 by Sangharakshita. He had then recently returned to England after spending two decades as a Buddhist and monk in India, following demobilisation from the British army. He had been born in south London as Dennis Lingwood, in August 1925. He would lead the organisation until his formal retirement in 1995, and would continue to exert a decisive influence on its thinking and practices thereafter. | + | As the [[Friends of the Western Buddhist Order]], the {{Wiki|community}} was founded in [[London]] in April 1967 by [[Sangharakshita]]. He had then recently returned to [[England]] after spending two decades as a [[Buddhist]] and [[monk]] in [[India]], following demobilisation from the {{Wiki|British army}}. He had been born in [[south]] [[London]] as [[Dennis Lingwood]], in August 1925. He would lead the organisation until his formal retirement in 1995, and would continue to exert a decisive influence on its [[thinking]] and practices thereafter. |
− | In the 1990s, the order grew in India, and, according to the Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Indian members now make up about half the movement's formal membership. In a book published in 2005, the FWBO's members and supporters were estimated to number 100,000, the majority of whom were in India. | + | In the 1990s, the order grew in [[India]], and, according to the {{Wiki|Encyclopedia}} of [[Buddhism]], [[Indian]] members now make up about half the movement's formal membership. In a [[book]] published in 2005, the FWBO's members and supporters were estimated to number 100,000, the majority of whom were in [[India]]. |
− | In 1997, the responsibility for ordination and spiritual leadership passed to a "preceptor's college", based in Birmingham. In 2000, the first chair of a preceptor's council was chosen by Sangharakshita. In future, this position will be elected by the WBO to five-year terms. | + | In 1997, the {{Wiki|responsibility}} for [[ordination]] and [[spiritual]] [[leadership]] passed to a "preceptor's {{Wiki|college}}", based in {{Wiki|Birmingham}}. In 2000, the first chair of a preceptor's council was chosen by [[Sangharakshita]]. In {{Wiki|future}}, this position will be elected by the [[WBO]] to five-year terms. |
− | In 2003, the public preceptors, responding to feedback, decided to move away from a formal relationship to the order and movement, and to concentrate on the ordination of new order members, teaching and dharma practice. At the same time, to increase flexibility, the number of preceptors was expanded. | + | In 2003, the public preceptors, responding to feedback, decided to move away from a formal relationship to the order and {{Wiki|movement}}, and to [[concentrate]] on the [[ordination]] of new order members, [[teaching]] and [[dharma practice]]. At the same time, [[to increase]] [[flexibility]], the number of preceptors was expanded. |
− | ==Name change== | + | ==[[Name]] change== |
− | In the spring of 2010, the movement's name was changed from Friends of the Western Buddhist Order to Triratna Buddhist Community (which approximates in English to the name used in India - Triratna Bauddha Mahasangha). This followed the movements development in India and other countries, where it was claimed that the word "western" was no longer appropriate. An official history acknowledges this to have been controversial among some Order members. ("Triratna", Sanskrit term meaning Three Jewels) | + | In the spring of 2010, the movement's [[name]] was changed from [[Friends of the Western Buddhist Order]] to [[Triratna Buddhist Community]] (which approximates in English to the [[name]] used in [[India]] - [[Triratna]] [[Bauddha]] [[Mahasangha]]). This followed the movements [[development]] in [[India]] and other countries, where it was claimed that the [[word]] "[[western]]" was no longer appropriate. An official history acknowledges this to have been controversial among some Order members. ("[[Triratna]]", [[Sanskrit]] term meaning [[Three Jewels]]) |
− | ==Controversies and criticism== | + | ==Controversies and [[criticism]]== |
− | '''Spiritual lineage''' | + | '''[[Spiritual lineage]]''' |
− | Although Sangharakshita studied under, and in some cases received initiations from, eminent Buddhist teachers during his two decades in India, including Jagdish Kashyap, Dhardo Rinpoche, HH Dudjom Rinpoche, HH Dilgo Khyentse, and Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche, some strands of Buddhism would find that he never worked closely enough with any of these to be considered their "dharma-heir". According to this viewpoint, the community thus lacks spiritual lineage, which some Buddhists believe to be important. | + | Although [[Sangharakshita]] studied under, and in some cases received [[initiations]] from, {{Wiki|eminent}} [[Buddhist teachers]] during his two decades in [[India]], [[including]] [[Jagdish Kashyap]], [[Dhardo Rinpoche]], HH [[Dudjom Rinpoche]], HH [[Dilgo Khyentse]], and [[Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche]], some [[strands]] of [[Buddhism]] would find that he never worked closely enough with any of these to be considered their "dharma-heir". According to this viewpoint, the {{Wiki|community}} thus lacks [[spiritual lineage]], which some [[Buddhists]] believe to be important. |
− | In his introduction to Vajrayana Buddhism, The Tibetan Book of Living & Dying, Sogyal Rinpoche of the Rigpa network within the Nyingma school, explains lineage thus: | + | In his introduction to [[Vajrayana Buddhism]], The [[Tibetan]] [[Book]] of Living & Dying, [[Sogyal Rinpoche]] of the [[Rigpa]] network within the [[Nyingma school]], explains [[lineage]] thus: |
− | ::"Lineage serves as a crucial safeguard: It maintains the authenticity and purity of the teaching. People know who a master is from who his master is." | + | ::"[[Lineage]] serves as a crucial safeguard: It maintains the authenticity and [[purity]] of the [[teaching]]. [[People]] know who a [[master]] is from who his [[master]] is." |
− | Lama Jampa Thaye, student of Karma Thinley Rinpoche and leader of the Dechen International Association of the Sakya and Karma Kagyu Buddhist tradition, makes the point more sharply. "... if a teacher is self-appointed or self-authenticated, whilst they may be very charming, intelligent, or very charismatic, the wisdom we receive from them is their own invention," he says. "It is conceivable they may be wonderfully wise, but more likely than not, the fact that they have taken this position as teacher on themselves is a display of their delusion and perhaps arrogance." Jampa Thaye also criticises the mixing of traditions, claiming this is like "taking one ingredient from each of a hundred recipes" which might lead to spending "the next seven incarnations in the toilet." | + | [[Lama Jampa Thaye]], [[student]] of [[Karma Thinley Rinpoche]] and leader of the Dechen International Association of the [[Sakya]] and [[Karma Kagyu]] [[Buddhist tradition]], makes the point more sharply. "... if a [[teacher]] is self-appointed or self-authenticated, whilst they may be very [[charming]], {{Wiki|intelligent}}, or very {{Wiki|charismatic}}, the [[wisdom]] we receive from them is their [[own]] invention," he says. "It is conceivable they may be wonderfully [[wise]], but more likely than not, the fact that they have taken this position as [[teacher]] on themselves is a display of their [[delusion]] and perhaps [[arrogance]]." [[Jampa Thaye]] also criticises the mixing of [[traditions]], claiming this is like "taking one ingredient from each of a hundred recipes" which might lead to spending "the next seven [[incarnations]] in the toilet." |
− | Rather than leadership by a guru, the community instead operates through what has been called a "friendly hierarchy," which some critics have said can cause problems. In 1997, Stephen Batchelor, a prominent Buddhist commentator, was quoted as saying that the FWBO operated as "a self-enclosed system" and that their writings "have the predictability of those who believe they have all the answers". | + | Rather than [[leadership]] by a [[guru]], the {{Wiki|community}} instead operates through what has been called a "friendly {{Wiki|hierarchy}}," which some critics have said can [[cause]] problems. In 1997, [[Stephen Batchelor]], a prominent [[Buddhist]] commentator, was quoted as saying that the [[FWBO]] operated as "a self-enclosed system" and that their writings "have the predictability of those who believe they have all the answers". |
− | In 1980 Sangharakshita wrote of his "conviction that the less the FWBO is involved with 'Buddhist groups' and with individuals affiliated to existing Buddhist traditions, the better." Currently, however, the community is a member of the European Buddhist Union and the Network of Buddhist Organisations, individual members of the order serve on the board of the International Network of Engaged Buddhists, and the FWBO's former magazine, Dharma Life, frequently carried articles by Buddhists from other organisations. | + | In 1980 [[Sangharakshita]] wrote of his "conviction that the less the [[FWBO]] is involved with '[[Buddhist]] groups' and with {{Wiki|individuals}} affiliated to [[existing]] [[Buddhist traditions]], the better." Currently, however, the {{Wiki|community}} is a member of the {{Wiki|European}} [[Buddhist]] Union and the Network of [[Buddhist]] Organisations, {{Wiki|individual}} members of the order serve on the board of the International Network of Engaged [[Buddhists]], and the FWBO's former magazine, [[Dharma]] [[Life]], frequently carried articles by [[Buddhists]] from other organisations. |
'''The Guardian report''' | '''The Guardian report''' | ||
− | In October 1997, the FWBO and Western Buddhist Order were rocked by a report by the religious affairs correspondent of the UK newspaper The Guardian, which made wide-ranging allegations of sexual misconduct, dogmatism and misogyny within the movement during the 1970s and 1980s. | + | In October 1997, the [[FWBO]] and [[Western Buddhist Order]] were rocked by a report by the [[religious]] affairs correspondent of the UK newspaper The Guardian, which made wide-ranging allegations of [[sexual misconduct]], {{Wiki|dogmatism}} and misogyny within the {{Wiki|movement}} during the 1970s and 1980s. |
− | The most detailed complaints reported were claims by Mark Dunlop, a former lover of Sangharakshita, who had lived with the movement’s founder for a number of years in the early 1970s, and left the order in 1985. The report described intimate details of what Dunlop characterised as their relationship, and claimed that Sangharakshita, who declined to comment, had told him “that to develop spiritually he had to get over his anti-homosexual conditioning.” | + | The most detailed complaints reported were claims by Mark Dunlop, a former lover of [[Sangharakshita]], who had lived with the movement’s founder for a number of years in the early 1970s, and left the order in 1985. The report described intimate details of what Dunlop characterised as their relationship, and claimed that [[Sangharakshita]], who declined to comment, had told him “that to develop [[spiritually]] he had to get over his anti-homosexual {{Wiki|conditioning}}.” |
− | The report contained further allegations from an anonymous source, who said that he had been persuaded into a sexual relationship with the leader of FWBO’s centre in Croydon, south of London. “The head of the community was a very powerful, intrusive personality and incredibly manipulative. He would intuitively become aware of people's vulnerabilities,” the source was reported to have said. | + | The report contained further allegations from an anonymous source, who said that he had been persuaded into a {{Wiki|sexual}} relationship with the leader of FWBO’s centre in Croydon, [[south]] of [[London]]. “The head of the {{Wiki|community}} was a very powerful, intrusive [[personality]] and incredibly manipulative. He would intuitively become {{Wiki|aware}} of people's vulnerabilities,” the source was reported to have said. |
− | A third concern drew on complaints by the mother of a former FWBO member who had committed suicide in 1990, following a history of depression. A report by a clinical psychologist said, among other things: “He feels the community attempted to alienate him from his family and from women, and that direct attempts were made to encourage him to practise homosexuality. He stated that he did not indulge in homosexual practices, although attempts were made for him to do so both by using inducements and by using threats.” | + | A third [[concern]] drew on complaints by the mother of a former [[FWBO]] member who had committed [[suicide]] in 1990, following a history of {{Wiki|depression}}. A report by a {{Wiki|clinical psychologist}} said, among other things: “He [[feels]] the {{Wiki|community}} attempted to alienate him from his [[family]] and from women, and that direct attempts were made to encourage him to practise [[homosexuality]]. He stated that he did not indulge in [[homosexual]] practices, although attempts were made for him to do so both by using inducements and by using threats.” |
− | '''Sexuality, women and the family''' | + | '''{{Wiki|Sexuality}}, women and the [[family]]''' |
− | Following The Guardian report, a widespread debate ensued. Critics pointed to writings by Sangharakshita, and his senior advisor Dharmachari Subhuti, which placed such emphasis on single-sex activities, and what the Triratna Buddhist Community calls | + | Following The Guardian report, a widespread [[debate]] ensued. Critics pointed to writings by [[Sangharakshita]], and his senior advisor Dharmachari [[Subhuti]], which placed such {{Wiki|emphasis}} on single-sex [[activities]], and what the [[Triratna Buddhist Community]] calls “[[spiritual friendship]]”, that the potential for misunderstandings or inappropriate {{Wiki|behaviour}} appeared to some to be inevitable. |
− | The FWBO had long been known for questioning assumptions about family life, and, according to the Encyclopedia of Buddhism: | + | The [[FWBO]] had long been known for questioning {{Wiki|assumptions}} about [[family]] [[life]], and, according to the {{Wiki|Encyclopedia}} of [[Buddhism]]: |
− | ::"Among the unique characteristics of the FWBO has been the open acceptance of homosexuality among the members. Order members have concluded that precept rules against abusing sexuality do not relate to the formal structure of sexual relations so much as to the nature of the relationship itself." | + | ::"Among the unique [[characteristics]] of the [[FWBO]] has been the open [[acceptance]] of [[homosexuality]] among the members. Order members have concluded that [[precept]] {{Wiki|rules}} against abusing {{Wiki|sexuality}} do not relate to the formal {{Wiki|structure}} of {{Wiki|sexual}} relations so much as to the [[nature]] of the relationship itself." |
− | In an official biography of Sangharakshita, published in 1994, and reissued in 2009, Subhuti says: | + | In an official {{Wiki|biography}} of [[Sangharakshita]], published in 1994, and reissued in 2009, [[Subhuti]] says: “[[Sangharakshita]] believes that men must break down their {{Wiki|fear}} of [[homosexuality]] by facing the fact that there may be some [[element]] of {{Wiki|sexual}} [[attraction]] towards their friends.” |
− | The Guardian report also raised controversy over statements by Sangharakshita which it interpreted as adverse to women and the family. Expressing views found in Buddhist texts from their earliest times, he has argued, for example, that, at least in the early stages of their spiritual careers, men are more apt to commit themselves to the spiritual life than women. In 1986, he wrote that the couple and nuclear family can be sources of neurosis. | + | The Guardian report also raised [[controversy]] over statements by [[Sangharakshita]] which it interpreted as adverse to women and the [[family]]. Expressing [[views]] found in [[Buddhist texts]] from their earliest times, he has argued, for example, that, at least in the early stages of their [[spiritual]] careers, men are more apt to commit themselves to the [[spiritual life]] than women. In 1986, he wrote that the couple and nuclear [[family]] can be sources of neurosis. |
− | ::"A couple consists, in fact, of two half-people, each of whom unconsciously invests part of his or her total being in the other: each is dependent on the other for the kind of psychological security that can be found, ultimately, only within oneself."(Sangharakshita, 1986, Alternative Traditions). | + | ::"A couple consists, in fact, of two half-people, each of whom {{Wiki|unconsciously}} invests part of his or her total being in the other: each is dependent on the other for the kind of [[psychological]] {{Wiki|security}} that can be found, ultimately, only within oneself."(Sangharakshita, 1986, Alternative [[Traditions]]). |
− | Although scriptures and historians recognize that the Buddha himself had concerns over such issues, particularly after the birth of his son Rahula, when he left home convinced that "family life was incompatible with the highest forms of spirituality", critics cite Sangharakshita's conservative views as evidence that misogynystic attitudes persisted in the FWBO during the 1980s. Evidence that those ideas may have been more widely held is also found in the writings of Subhuti, who echoes the sutras when he says in his book, 'Women, men and angels,' that to be reborn as a woman is to be less spiritually able than to be reborn as a man. | + | Although [[scriptures]] and {{Wiki|historians}} [[recognize]] that the [[Buddha]] himself had concerns over such issues, particularly after the [[birth]] of his [[son Rahula]], when he left home convinced that "[[family]] [[life]] was incompatible with the [[highest]] [[forms]] of [[spirituality]]", critics cite [[Sangharakshita's]] conservative [[views]] [[as evidence]] that misogynystic attitudes persisted in the [[FWBO]] during the 1980s. {{Wiki|Evidence}} that those [[ideas]] may have been more widely held is also found in the writings of [[Subhuti]], who echoes the [[sutras]] when he says in his [[book]], 'Women, men and {{Wiki|angels}},' that to be [[reborn]] as a woman is to be less [[spiritually]] able than to be [[reborn]] as a man. |
− | As a movement, what was then the FWBO gave detailed responses and staunchly supported its founder, while in 2010 the renamed movement published an official history which acknowledged widespread concern among order members that, at least in the 1980s and before, the founder had misused his position as a Buddhist teacher to sexually exploit young men. | + | As a {{Wiki|movement}}, what was then the [[FWBO]] gave detailed responses and staunchly supported its founder, while in 2010 the renamed {{Wiki|movement}} published an official history which [[acknowledged]] widespread [[concern]] among order members that, at least in the 1980s and before, the founder had misused his position as a [[Buddhist teacher]] to sexually exploit young men. |
− | The controversies have attracted little public interest, and in recent years both The Guardian, and its sister Sunday newspaper, The Observer, have run many supportive items, recommending community activities. A Guardian Web directory listed the FWBO website as "a good starting point for children." | + | The controversies have attracted little public [[interest]], and in recent years both The Guardian, and its sister [[Sunday]] newspaper, The Observer, have run many supportive items, recommending {{Wiki|community}} [[activities]]. A Guardian Web directory listed the [[FWBO]] website as "a good starting point for children." |
{{W}} | {{W}} | ||
[[Category:Buddhist Organizations]] | [[Category:Buddhist Organizations]] |
Revision as of 11:07, 15 February 2016
The Triratna Buddhist Community (formerly the Friends of the Western Buddhist Order (FWBO)) is an international fellowship of Buddhists, and others who aspire to its path of mindfulness, under the leadership of the Triratna Buddhist Order (formerly the Western Buddhist Order). It was founded by Sangharakshita in the UK in 1967, and describes itself as "an international network dedicated to communicating Buddhist truths in ways appropriate to the modern world". In keeping with Buddhist traditions, it also pays attention to contemporary ideas, particularly drawn from Western philosophy, psychotherapy, and art.
Worldwide, more than 100 groups are affiliated with the community, including in North America, Australasia and Europe. In the UK, it is one of the largest Buddhist movements, with some 30 urban centres and retreat centres. Its largest following, however, is in India, where it is known as Triratna Bauddha Mahāsaṅgha (TBM) (formerly the Trailokya Bauddha Mahasangha Sahayak Gana).
The community has been described as "perhaps the most successful attempt to create an ecumenical international Buddhist organization," and "an important contributor to Buddhism on the world stage." It has also been criticised, most notably for lacking "spiritual lineage" and over claims of sexual exploitation and misogyny during the 1970s and 1980s."
Practices and activities
Meditation is the common thread through activities. Order members teach two practices: (a) "The mindfulness of breathing" (anapanasati), in which practitioners focus on the rise and fall of the breath; and (b) "The metta bhavana", which approximately translates from the original Pali as "the cultivation of lovingkindness". These practices are felt to be complementary in promoting equanimity and friendliness towards others. Some friends of the Order may have little, if any, other involvement in its activities; but friendship, Sangha, and community are encouraged at all levels as essential contexts for meditation.
The founder, Sangharakshita, described meditation as having four phases. The first two according to his system ('integration' and 'positive emotion', can be correlated to the traditional category of "calming" "samatha" practices, and the last two (spiritual death and spiritual rebirth) can be correlated to "insight" or "vipassana" practices. For those not ordained into the Triratna Buddhist Order, the practices associated with the first two are emphasised, though the spirit of the last two is also taught.
These phases are:
- 1.Integration. The main practice at this stage is the mindfulness of breathing, which is intended to have the effect ::of "integrating the psyche" – improving mindfulness and concentration, and reducing psychological conflict.
- 2.Positive emotion. The second aspect of samatha is developing positivity – an other-regarding, life-affirming ::attitude. The Brahmavihara meditations, especially the 'metta bhavana' or cultivation of loving kindness meditations, are ::the key practices intended to foster the development of positive emotion.
- 3.Spiritual death. The next stage is to develop insight into what is seen to be the emptiness of the self and reality. ::Meditations at this stage include considering the elements of which self and world are thought to be composed; contemplating ::impermance (particularly of the body); contemplating suffering; and contemplating sunyata.
- .4Spiritual rebirth. The WBO teaches that, with the development of insight and the death of the limited ego-self, a ::person is spiritually reborn. Practices which involve the visualization of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are among the main ::practices in this phase. At ordination, each dharmachari(ni) is given an advanced visualisation meditation on a particular ::figure.
Centres also teach scripture, yoga and other methods of self-improvement, some of which are felt by some commentators to come from outside the Buddhist tradition. Recently, community activities have begun to include outdoor festivals, online meditation courses, arts festivals, poetry and writing workshops, tai chi, karate, and pilgrimages to Buddhist holy sites in India. For many years, the community charity Karuna Trust (UK) has raised money for aid projects in India.
As among Buddhists generally, Puja is a ritual practice at some events, intended to awaken the desire to liberate all beings from suffering. The most common ritual consists of a puja, derived and adapted from the Bodhicaryavatara of Shantideva.
Retreats provide a chance to focus on meditational practice more intensely, in a residential context outside of a retreatant's everyday life. community retreats can be broadly categorised into meditation retreats, study retreats, and solitary retreats. Retreat lengths vary from short weekends to one or two weeks.
Businesses, said to operate to the principle of "right livelihood", generate funds for the movement, as well seeking to provide environments for spiritual growth through employment. Emphasis is placed on teamwork, and on contributing to the welfare of others: for example by funding social projects and by considering ethical matters such as fair trade. The largest community business is Windhorse:Evolution, a gift wholesaling business and a chain of gift shops.
Many cities with a Triratna centre also have a residential community. The first of these was formed after a retreat where some participants wanted to continue retreat-style living. Since it was felt that the most stable communities tended to be single sex, this has become the paradigm for communities. Support from fellow practitioners in a community is seen to be effective in helping members make spiritual progress.
The largest TBC centre in the UK is the London Buddhist Centre in Bethnal Green, East London, which offers drop-in lunchtime meditation sessions each weekday, open to beginners, as well as courses and classes through the week. The centre's courses for depression, based on the mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy methodology of Jon Kabat-Zinn at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, featured in the Financial Times in 2008. This initiative is supported by the local authority, the London borough of Tower Hamlets. The Times has also reported on the centre's work with those affected by alcohol dependency
Defining the movement
According to the community, six characteristics define it:
- 1.An ecumenical movement. It is not identified with any particular strand or school of Buddhism, but draws inspiration ::from many. It calls itself "ecumenical" rather than "eclectic" because it is founded on the premise that there is an ::underlying unity to all schools.
- 2."Going for refuge" is central. "Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels" – meaning the Buddha, the Dharma, and the ::Sangha – is considered to be what makes someone a Buddhist
- 3.A unified Order. Unlike some sangha, the community does not propagate a monastic lineage. Sangharakshita devised a ::non-monastic ordination system, whilst also allowing the undertaking of the "anagarika" precept which enjoins celibacy. ::Identical ordination is open to both sexes. While the movement regards single-sex activities as important to spiritual ::growth, men and women are recognised as being equally able to practice and develop spiritually.
- 4.An emphasis on spiritual friendship. There is a strong emphasis on the sangha, and spiritual friendship based on ::shared values. The community teaches that spending time with friends who share ideals, and engaging in ritual practice with ::them, supports ethical living and the arising of the bodhicitta.
- 5.Teamwork. Working together in teams, in the spirit of generosity and with a focus on ethics, is considered a ::transformative spiritual practice.
- 6.Importance of art. Engagement in, and an appreciation of, the arts are considered to be a valuable aspect of ::spiritual practice. The community teaches that a refinement of one's artistic tastes can help refine emotional sensitivity ::and provide a channel for the expression of right living, and spiritual growth. More broadly, the movement seeks ways to ::re-express Buddhism by making connections with sympathetic elements in the surrounding culture, regarding the arts as such ::an aspect of western culture.
"The FWBO's attitude to spreading the Dharma is one of heartfelt urgency," wrote Stephen Batchelor, a prominent British Buddhist author, in a book published in 1994. "For the FWBO, Western Society as such needs to be subject to the unflinching scrutiny of Buddhist values."
The Triratna Buddhist Order
The Triratna Buddhist Order is the focal-point of the community, and is a network of friendships between individuals who have made personal commitments to the Buddha, the dharma and the sangha, in communion with others. Members are known as dharmacharis (masculine) or dharmacharinis (feminine), and are ordained in accord with a ceremony formulated by the founder. At ordination they are given a religious name in Pali or Sanskrit. While there is an informal hierarchy within the order, there are no higher ordinations. A small number of members, however, take vows of celibacy and adopt a simpler lifestyle. Contrary to the traditional Buddhist structure of separating lay and monastic members, the order combines monastic and lay lifestyles under one ordination, a practice not dissimilar to that which evolved in some Japanese schools of Buddhism.
As with followers of the Shingon school of Buddhism, order members observe ten precepts (ethical training rules). These precepts are different from monastic vows and do not appear in the Vinaya Pitaka, but were formulated on the basis of the so-called "dasa-kusala-dhammas" (ten wholesome actions). These are found in several places in the Pāli Canon, as well as in some Sanskrit sources. The karma sections of the fundamental meditation texts of all four schools of Tibetan Buddhism also list these acts as basic guidelines for lay or ordained practitioners intent on observing the law of cause and effect.
Beyond this, a commitment to personal dharma practice and to remain in communication with other members are the only expectations. Ordination confers no special status, nor any specific responsibilities, although many order members choose to take on responsibilities for such things as teaching meditation and dharma. In mid-2008, there were around 1,500 members of the order, in more than 20 countries.
The wider community
In the Triratna community, as in the Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions, sangha is interpreted as the Buddhist community as a whole. Someone who regularly attends community activities is considered to be a "friend". Friends do not have to regard themselves as Buddhists, and can be of any faith, or none. Some choose, after some time, to participate in a formal ceremony of affiliation, and thus become a "mitra." "Mitra" is Sanskrit for "friend", which in this case denotes a person who considers themselves Buddhist, who makes an effort to live in accordance with the five ethical precepts, and who feels that this spiritual community is the appropriate one for them.
Those who wish to join the order must request this in writing. It can then sometimes take several years to prepare for ordination. This is an informal process, the focus of which is to deepen one's commitment.
Some friends, mitras and order members decide, at least for a while, to study teachings from outside the community, including non-Buddhist traditions such as Sufism.
History
As the Friends of the Western Buddhist Order, the community was founded in London in April 1967 by Sangharakshita. He had then recently returned to England after spending two decades as a Buddhist and monk in India, following demobilisation from the British army. He had been born in south London as Dennis Lingwood, in August 1925. He would lead the organisation until his formal retirement in 1995, and would continue to exert a decisive influence on its thinking and practices thereafter.
In the 1990s, the order grew in India, and, according to the Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Indian members now make up about half the movement's formal membership. In a book published in 2005, the FWBO's members and supporters were estimated to number 100,000, the majority of whom were in India.
In 1997, the responsibility for ordination and spiritual leadership passed to a "preceptor's college", based in Birmingham. In 2000, the first chair of a preceptor's council was chosen by Sangharakshita. In future, this position will be elected by the WBO to five-year terms.
In 2003, the public preceptors, responding to feedback, decided to move away from a formal relationship to the order and movement, and to concentrate on the ordination of new order members, teaching and dharma practice. At the same time, to increase flexibility, the number of preceptors was expanded.
Name change
In the spring of 2010, the movement's name was changed from Friends of the Western Buddhist Order to Triratna Buddhist Community (which approximates in English to the name used in India - Triratna Bauddha Mahasangha). This followed the movements development in India and other countries, where it was claimed that the word "western" was no longer appropriate. An official history acknowledges this to have been controversial among some Order members. ("Triratna", Sanskrit term meaning Three Jewels)
Controversies and criticism
Although Sangharakshita studied under, and in some cases received initiations from, eminent Buddhist teachers during his two decades in India, including Jagdish Kashyap, Dhardo Rinpoche, HH Dudjom Rinpoche, HH Dilgo Khyentse, and Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche, some strands of Buddhism would find that he never worked closely enough with any of these to be considered their "dharma-heir". According to this viewpoint, the community thus lacks spiritual lineage, which some Buddhists believe to be important.
In his introduction to Vajrayana Buddhism, The Tibetan Book of Living & Dying, Sogyal Rinpoche of the Rigpa network within the Nyingma school, explains lineage thus:
Lama Jampa Thaye, student of Karma Thinley Rinpoche and leader of the Dechen International Association of the Sakya and Karma Kagyu Buddhist tradition, makes the point more sharply. "... if a teacher is self-appointed or self-authenticated, whilst they may be very charming, intelligent, or very charismatic, the wisdom we receive from them is their own invention," he says. "It is conceivable they may be wonderfully wise, but more likely than not, the fact that they have taken this position as teacher on themselves is a display of their delusion and perhaps arrogance." Jampa Thaye also criticises the mixing of traditions, claiming this is like "taking one ingredient from each of a hundred recipes" which might lead to spending "the next seven incarnations in the toilet."
Rather than leadership by a guru, the community instead operates through what has been called a "friendly hierarchy," which some critics have said can cause problems. In 1997, Stephen Batchelor, a prominent Buddhist commentator, was quoted as saying that the FWBO operated as "a self-enclosed system" and that their writings "have the predictability of those who believe they have all the answers".
In 1980 Sangharakshita wrote of his "conviction that the less the FWBO is involved with 'Buddhist groups' and with individuals affiliated to existing Buddhist traditions, the better." Currently, however, the community is a member of the European Buddhist Union and the Network of Buddhist Organisations, individual members of the order serve on the board of the International Network of Engaged Buddhists, and the FWBO's former magazine, Dharma Life, frequently carried articles by Buddhists from other organisations.
The Guardian report
In October 1997, the FWBO and Western Buddhist Order were rocked by a report by the religious affairs correspondent of the UK newspaper The Guardian, which made wide-ranging allegations of sexual misconduct, dogmatism and misogyny within the movement during the 1970s and 1980s.
The most detailed complaints reported were claims by Mark Dunlop, a former lover of Sangharakshita, who had lived with the movement’s founder for a number of years in the early 1970s, and left the order in 1985. The report described intimate details of what Dunlop characterised as their relationship, and claimed that Sangharakshita, who declined to comment, had told him “that to develop spiritually he had to get over his anti-homosexual conditioning.”
The report contained further allegations from an anonymous source, who said that he had been persuaded into a sexual relationship with the leader of FWBO’s centre in Croydon, south of London. “The head of the community was a very powerful, intrusive personality and incredibly manipulative. He would intuitively become aware of people's vulnerabilities,” the source was reported to have said.
A third concern drew on complaints by the mother of a former FWBO member who had committed suicide in 1990, following a history of depression. A report by a clinical psychologist said, among other things: “He feels the community attempted to alienate him from his family and from women, and that direct attempts were made to encourage him to practise homosexuality. He stated that he did not indulge in homosexual practices, although attempts were made for him to do so both by using inducements and by using threats.”
Sexuality, women and the family
Following The Guardian report, a widespread debate ensued. Critics pointed to writings by Sangharakshita, and his senior advisor Dharmachari Subhuti, which placed such emphasis on single-sex activities, and what the Triratna Buddhist Community calls “spiritual friendship”, that the potential for misunderstandings or inappropriate behaviour appeared to some to be inevitable.
The FWBO had long been known for questioning assumptions about family life, and, according to the Encyclopedia of Buddhism:
- "Among the unique characteristics of the FWBO has been the open acceptance of homosexuality among the members. Order members have concluded that precept rules against abusing sexuality do not relate to the formal structure of sexual relations so much as to the nature of the relationship itself."
In an official biography of Sangharakshita, published in 1994, and reissued in 2009, Subhuti says: “Sangharakshita believes that men must break down their fear of homosexuality by facing the fact that there may be some element of sexual attraction towards their friends.”
The Guardian report also raised controversy over statements by Sangharakshita which it interpreted as adverse to women and the family. Expressing views found in Buddhist texts from their earliest times, he has argued, for example, that, at least in the early stages of their spiritual careers, men are more apt to commit themselves to the spiritual life than women. In 1986, he wrote that the couple and nuclear family can be sources of neurosis.
- "A couple consists, in fact, of two half-people, each of whom unconsciously invests part of his or her total being in the other: each is dependent on the other for the kind of psychological security that can be found, ultimately, only within oneself."(Sangharakshita, 1986, Alternative Traditions).
Although scriptures and historians recognize that the Buddha himself had concerns over such issues, particularly after the birth of his son Rahula, when he left home convinced that "family life was incompatible with the highest forms of spirituality", critics cite Sangharakshita's conservative views as evidence that misogynystic attitudes persisted in the FWBO during the 1980s. Evidence that those ideas may have been more widely held is also found in the writings of Subhuti, who echoes the sutras when he says in his book, 'Women, men and angels,' that to be reborn as a woman is to be less spiritually able than to be reborn as a man.
As a movement, what was then the FWBO gave detailed responses and staunchly supported its founder, while in 2010 the renamed movement published an official history which acknowledged widespread concern among order members that, at least in the 1980s and before, the founder had misused his position as a Buddhist teacher to sexually exploit young men.
The controversies have attracted little public interest, and in recent years both The Guardian, and its sister Sunday newspaper, The Observer, have run many supportive items, recommending community activities. A Guardian Web directory listed the FWBO website as "a good starting point for children."