Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "THE MAPPING OF SACRED SPACE: IMAGES OF BUDDHIST COSMOGRAPHIES IN MEDIEVAL CHINA"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " THE MAPPING OF SACRED SPACE: IMAGES OF BUDDHIST COSMOGRAPHIES IN MEDIEVAL CHINA Dorothy C. Wong The philosophical {{Wiki|concept}} of a "cosmos"...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
  
THE MAPPING OF SACRED SPACE: IMAGES OF [[BUDDHIST]] COSMOGRAPHIES IN MEDIEVAL [[CHINA]]
+
===THE MAPPING OF SACRED SPACE: IMAGES OF [[BUDDHIST]] COSMOGRAPHIES IN MEDIEVAL [[CHINA]]===
  
  
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
The [[philosophical]] {{Wiki|concept}} of a "[[cosmos]]" transforms the {{Wiki|chaos}} of our experiential [[world]] through the structures of {{Wiki|space and time}} and, as W. Randolph [[Kloetzli]] notes, It must not be understood primarily as the [[physical]] [[universe]], but rather as structured [[reality]] at every level, whether [[physical]] or [[spiritual]]." 1 In his [[investigation]] of {{Wiki|perspective}} construction and the relationship between [[art]] and [[science]] in the [[Western]] [[tradition]], Martin Kemp remarks, "{{Wiki|Naturalistic}} painting and [[science]] both {{Wiki|present}} models of the [[world]]. Both kinds of model rely upon discovery and invention, and upon some [[form]] of systematic recreation of the investigator." 2 The underlying assumption of this observation is that the mode of [[perception]] that informs {{Wiki|naturalistic}} painting is based on epistemology, namely, [[science]]. In {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist paintings]] of the {{Wiki|medieval}} period (ca. sixth to tenth century), certain depictions of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] ([[especially pure]] land {{Wiki|cosmologies}}) also achieve a remarkable [[degree]] of spatial [[realism]] comparable to that achieved in {{Wiki|Renaissance}} and classical [[traditions]] in the [[West]], and underscore a [[rational]] [[perception]] and ordering of the [[universe]]. Rather than being based in [[Western]] [[science]], this specific mode of [[perception]] and [[representation]] corresponds to [[Buddhist]] [[cosmological]] conceptions or, more specifically, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[interpretation]] and mapping of certain [[Buddhist]] cosmographies. Are these similarities in {{Wiki|naturalistic}} {{Wiki|representations}} of the [[universe]], [[physical]] or [[metaphysical]], in disparate [[traditions]] only accidents in history, or are there larger {{Wiki|principles}} behind the correlates in {{Wiki|conception}}, [[perception]], and [[representation]]? The resemblance of the [[pure land]] {{Wiki|perspective}} to that achieved in other [[traditions]] is but one of many attempts
+
The [[philosophical]] {{Wiki|concept}} of a "[[cosmos]]" transforms the {{Wiki|chaos}} of our experiential [[world]] through the structures of {{Wiki|space and time}} and, as W. Randolph [[Kloetzli]] notes, It must not be understood primarily as the [[physical]] [[universe]], but rather as structured [[reality]] at every level, whether [[physical]] or [[spiritual]]." 1 In his [[investigation]] of {{Wiki|perspective}} construction and the relationship between [[art]] and [[science]] in the [[Western]] [[tradition]], Martin Kemp remarks, "{{Wiki|Naturalistic}} painting and [[science]] both {{Wiki|present}} models of the [[world]].  
 +
 
 +
Both kinds of model rely upon discovery and invention, and upon some [[form]] of systematic recreation of the investigator." The underlying assumption of this observation is that the mode of [[perception]] that informs {{Wiki|naturalistic}} painting is based on epistemology, namely, [[science]].  
 +
 
 +
In {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist paintings]] of the {{Wiki|medieval}} period (ca. sixth to tenth century), certain depictions of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] ([[especially pure]] land {{Wiki|cosmologies}}) also achieve a remarkable [[degree]] of spatial [[realism]] comparable to that achieved in {{Wiki|Renaissance}} and classical [[traditions]] in the [[West]], and underscore a [[rational]] [[perception]] and ordering of the [[universe]].  
 +
 
 +
Rather than being based in [[Western]] [[science]], this specific mode of [[perception]] and [[representation]] corresponds to [[Buddhist]] [[cosmological]] conceptions or, more specifically, the {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[interpretation]] and mapping of certain [[Buddhist]] cosmographies. Are these similarities in  
 +
 
 +
{{Wiki|naturalistic}} {{Wiki|representations}} of the [[universe]], [[physical]] or [[metaphysical]], in disparate [[traditions]] only accidents in history, or are there larger {{Wiki|principles}} behind the correlates in {{Wiki|conception}}, [[perception]], and [[representation]]? The resemblance of the [[pure land]] {{Wiki|perspective}} to that achieved in other [[traditions]] is but one of many attempts
  
 
I [[Kloetzli]] 1983: 19. '2 Kemp 1990: 338.
 
I [[Kloetzli]] 1983: 19. '2 Kemp 1990: 338.
Line 17: Line 25:
 
to map various types of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies. What, then, are other modes of [[representation]]? And what are the factors that contribute to the selection of a particular mode of cosmographic [[representation]]?
 
to map various types of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies. What, then, are other modes of [[representation]]? And what are the factors that contribute to the selection of a particular mode of cosmographic [[representation]]?
  
The oldest {{Wiki|conception}} of [[Buddhist cosmology]] is rooted in the [[Indian tradition]], shared by both the [[Hindu]] and [[Jain]] [[religions]]. This [[cosmology]], however, evolved as the [[Buddhist doctrine]] developed, expanding and [[transforming]] into a very different one in [[Mahayana Buddhism]]. [[Buddhist cosmology]] is a vast topic; here I outline a rudimentary {{Wiki|classification}} that distinguishes the single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[Buddhist cosmology]] from the multiple-world system, or [[cosmology]] of innumerables, of [[Mahayana]] [[cosmology]].  Within each category, certain systems stand out because of devotional or [[doctrinal]] developments. For example, the [[pure land]] [[cosmology]] of Amitäbha/Amitäyus, which belongs to the multiple-world system, came to dominate [[Mahãyãna]] [[Buddhist practice]] in {{Wiki|medieval}} [[China]]. Another strand of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhist]] [[thought]] in [[China]] emphasized the {{Wiki|worship}} of [[Vairocana Buddha]], whose [[cosmology]] of the [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] incorporated the earlier single-world system but [[transformed]] it into a fantastic, miraculous [[realm]]. These different [[Buddhist cosmologies]] are integral to the diverse theories of [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|soteriology}} set forth in various texts, and they coexist as competing schemes of salvific [[visions]].
+
The oldest {{Wiki|conception}} of [[Buddhist cosmology]] is rooted in the [[Indian tradition]], shared by both the [[Hindu]] and [[Jain]] [[religions]]. This [[cosmology]], however, evolved as the [[Buddhist doctrine]] developed, expanding and [[transforming]] into a very different one in [[Mahayana Buddhism]]. [[Buddhist cosmology]] is a vast topic; here I outline a rudimentary {{Wiki|classification}} that distinguishes the single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[Buddhist cosmology]] from the multiple-world system, or [[cosmology]] of innumerables, of [[Mahayana]] [[cosmology]].   
 +
 
 +
Within each category, certain systems stand out because of devotional or [[doctrinal]] developments. For example, the [[pure land]] [[cosmology]] of Amitäbha/Amitäyus, which belongs to the multiple-world system, came to dominate [[Mahãyãna]] [[Buddhist practice]] in {{Wiki|medieval}} [[China]]. Another strand of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhist]] [[thought]] in [[China]] emphasized the {{Wiki|worship}} of [[Vairocana Buddha]], whose [[cosmology]] of the [[Lotus]]  
 +
 
 +
[[Repository World]] incorporated the earlier single-world system but [[transformed]] it into a fantastic, miraculous [[realm]]. These different [[Buddhist cosmologies]] are integral to the diverse theories of [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|soteriology}} set forth in various texts, and they coexist as competing schemes of salvific [[visions]].
  
 
Before the introduction of [[Buddhism]], the {{Wiki|Chinese}} possessed their [[own]] theories about the [[universe]], albeit less systematic and fantastic than [[Indian]] speculations.  [[Buddhist cosmologies]] and images of cosmographic conceptions were also transmitted when the [[religion]] entered [[China]], by way of land and sea routes, beginning in the early centuries of the [[Common Era]]. In the fifth and sixth centuries, when the {{Wiki|Chinese}} production of [[Buddhist art]] began, the images or partial images of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] found in [[China]], such as those depicted in [[Dunhuang]] murals (see below), primarily belonged to the  
 
Before the introduction of [[Buddhism]], the {{Wiki|Chinese}} possessed their [[own]] theories about the [[universe]], albeit less systematic and fantastic than [[Indian]] speculations.  [[Buddhist cosmologies]] and images of cosmographic conceptions were also transmitted when the [[religion]] entered [[China]], by way of land and sea routes, beginning in the early centuries of the [[Common Era]]. In the fifth and sixth centuries, when the {{Wiki|Chinese}} production of [[Buddhist art]] began, the images or partial images of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] found in [[China]], such as those depicted in [[Dunhuang]] murals (see below), primarily belonged to the  
  
single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[cosmology]]. Sometimes interacting with indigenous [[traditions]], these foreign [[cosmological]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and images coexisted with local ones. In [[India]], [[Buddhism]] virtually disappeared after the twelfth century, and many [[cosmological]] {{Wiki|artifacts}} have been destroyed, except for rare examples and those expressed in the [[form]] of [[stupas]] or architectural monuments. As a result, the early images of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] in [[China]] provide some {{Wiki|evidence}} as to what the [[Indian]] ones may have been like and how they might have been transmitted to [[China]]. The images of [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}}, however, were developed {{Wiki|independently}} in [[China]], coinciding with local developments of [[Mahayana Buddhism]] in [[China]] from the sixth and seventh centuries onward. These later {{Wiki|Chinese}} images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies largely flourished outside of [[India]], even though their contents were based on [[Wikipedia:canonical|canonical]] texts that originated in [[India]].
+
single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[cosmology]]. Sometimes interacting with indigenous [[traditions]], these foreign [[cosmological]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] and images coexisted with local ones. In [[India]], [[Buddhism]] virtually disappeared after the twelfth century, and many [[cosmological]] {{Wiki|artifacts}} have been destroyed, except for rare examples and those expressed in the [[form]] of [[stupas]] or architectural monuments.  
 +
 
 +
As a result, the early images of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] in [[China]] provide some {{Wiki|evidence}} as to what the [[Indian]] ones may have been like and how they might have been transmitted to [[China]]. The images of [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}}, however, were developed {{Wiki|independently}} in [[China]], coinciding with local developments of [[Mahayana Buddhism]] in [[China]] from the sixth and seventh centuries onward. These later {{Wiki|Chinese}} images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies largely flourished outside of [[India]], even though their contents were based on [[Wikipedia:canonical|canonical]] texts that originated in [[India]].
  
 
    
 
    
This [[chapter]] includes [[discussion]] of both the single-world and the multiple-world systems of [[Buddhist cosmologies]], and the images associated with each category. It also discusses the [[transmission]], {{Wiki|reception}}, and [[transformation]] of [[Buddhist]] images of {{Wiki|cosmologies}} in [[China]], most of which pertain to the single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[Buddhism]]. When examining the images of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhist cosmologies]] that prevailed in [[China]] from the seventh century onward, I argue that the introduction of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] impelled {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} to find new ways to visually represent the {{Wiki|novel}} ideologies. For example, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} attempted the [[representation]] of illusionist three-dimensional [[space]] on plane surfaces in the pictorial [[arts]] of the {{Wiki|Han dynasty}} (206 BCE—220 CE) through the use of a parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}}. Incorporating this indigenous {{Wiki|perspective}} with the compositional {{Wiki|principles}} of [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]], which {{Wiki|emphasize}} {{Wiki|symmetry}} and frontality, they arrived at a convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} that portrayed deep recessional [[space]], in images of [[pure land]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} in particular. The [[acceptance]] of and {{Wiki|emphasis}} on certain aspects of the [[Buddhist]] ideology thus had an impact on shaping and [[transforming]] the {{Wiki|structure}} of [[time and space]] in {{Wiki|Chinese}} pictorial {{Wiki|representations}}. In examining {{Wiki|Chinese}} images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies, I draw primarily on the rich repertoire of sculptures and paintings from the [[Dunhuang]] cavechapels and nearby sites on the [[Silk Road]]. Dating from the fifth through the thirteenth century, the [[art]] of [[Dunhuang]] is predominantly [[Mahayana]] in content, although there are also [[subjects]] associated with [[Theravada]] and [[Tantric Buddhism]].
+
This [[chapter]] includes [[discussion]] of both the single-world and the multiple-world systems of [[Buddhist cosmologies]], and the images associated with each category. It also discusses the [[transmission]], {{Wiki|reception}}, and [[transformation]] of [[Buddhist]] images of {{Wiki|cosmologies}} in [[China]], most of which pertain to the single-world system of pre-Mahayana [[Buddhism]]. When examining the images of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhist cosmologies]] that prevailed in [[China]] from the seventh century onward,  
 +
 
 +
I argue that the introduction of [[Buddhist cosmologies]] impelled {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} to find new ways to visually represent the {{Wiki|novel}} ideologies. For example, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} attempted the [[representation]] of illusionist three-dimensional [[space]] on plane surfaces in the pictorial [[arts]] of the {{Wiki|Han dynasty}} (206 BCE—220 CE) through the use of a parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}}.  
 +
 
 +
Incorporating this indigenous {{Wiki|perspective}} with the compositional {{Wiki|principles}} of [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]], which {{Wiki|emphasize}} {{Wiki|symmetry}} and frontality, they arrived at a convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} that portrayed deep recessional [[space]], in images of [[pure land]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} in particular.  
 +
 
 +
The [[acceptance]] of and {{Wiki|emphasis}} on certain aspects of the [[Buddhist]] ideology thus had an impact on shaping and [[transforming]] the {{Wiki|structure}} of [[time and space]] in {{Wiki|Chinese}} pictorial {{Wiki|representations}}.  
  
 +
In examining {{Wiki|Chinese}} images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies, I draw primarily on the rich repertoire of sculptures and paintings from the [[Dunhuang]] [[cave]] chapels and nearby sites on the [[Silk Road]]. Dating from the fifth through the thirteenth century, the [[art]] of [[Dunhuang]] is predominantly [[Mahayana]] in content, although there are also [[subjects]] associated with [[Theravada]] and [[Tantric Buddhism]].
  
The Single- [[World]] System
 
  
 +
===The Single- [[World]] System===
  
The single-world system, which characterizes the pre-Mahayana [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|conception}} of the [[universe]], has been more or less consistently described in texts of [[Theravada Buddhism]], especially the Abhidharmako§a. This [[cosmology]] is also known as the triple-world system because the [[world]] is divided into [[three realms]] from bottom to top: the [[realms of desire]] (kãmadhãtu), [[form]] (rüPadhãtu), and [[formlessness]] (arüþadhãtu).
 
At the base, the [[substance]] of this [[universe]] is [[conceived]] as a single, circular disk surrounded by a wall of {{Wiki|iron}} (cakravãla) on the perimeter. Circles of [[wind]], [[water]], and {{Wiki|gold}} [[earth]] lie one above the other. Within the perimeter of the {{Wiki|iron}} mountain is a series of seven circular, golden {{Wiki|mountain ranges}} arranged concentrically, with [[Mount Meru]], the [[world]] mountain or axzs mundi, at the center.  The waters of the various seas fill the regions between the {{Wiki|mountain ranges}}. On the outer rim of the great ocean are the four inhabited landmasses, located at the {{Wiki|compass}} points: Pürvavideha in the [[east]], Jambudvïpa in the [[south]], Aparagodänïya in the [[west]], and [[Uttarakuru]] in the [[north]].
 
  
Five classes of [[beings]] inhabit the [[realm of desire]]: [[gods]] ([[devas]]), [[human beings]], [[animals]], [[ghosts]], and [[hell]] dwellers; sometimes a sixth category is added: [[asuras]] (or {{Wiki|demonic}} [[gods]]). The [[beings]] of lower [[spiritual]] levels dwell in the bottom part of this [[realm]]. [[Mount Meru]], encircled by the [[serpent]] [[kings]] (nãgas), rises above, and the [[gods]] inhabit the [[six heavens]] on top of it. [[Mount Meru]] thus connects both the [[heavens]] at the top and the [[hells]] at the bottom. Among the [[heavens]] the important ones are Träyastriméa, the abode of [[Indra]] (the [[god of gods]]), located directly above [[Mount Meru]]; and [[Tusita]], [[the fourth]] [[heaven]], where a [[bodhisattva]] is born immediately prior to being born as a [[buddha]]. On top of the [[realm of desire]] are the seventeen [[heavens]] of the [[realm of form]], and above that are the four "infinities" of the [[realm of formlessness]].
+
The single-world system, which characterizes the pre-Mahayana [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|conception}} of the [[universe]], has been more or less consistently described in texts of [[Theravada Buddhism]], especially the [[[Abhidharmakosa]]. This [[cosmology]] is also known as the [[triple-world system]] because the [[world]] is divided into [[three realms]] from bottom to top: the [[realms of desire]] ([[kãmadhãtu]]), [[form]] ([[rüpadhãtu)]], and [[formlessness]] ([[arüþadhãtu]]).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At the base, the [[substance]] of this [[universe]] is [[conceived]] as a single, circular disk surrounded by a wall of {{Wiki|iron}} (cakravãla) on the perimeter. Circles of [[wind]], [[water]], and {{Wiki|gold}} [[earth]] lie one above the other. Within the perimeter of the {{Wiki|iron}} mountain is a series
 +
 
 +
of seven circular, golden {{Wiki|mountain ranges}} arranged concentrically, with [[Mount Meru]], the [[world]] mountain or axzs mundi, at the center.  The waters of the various seas fill the regions between the {{Wiki|mountain ranges}}. On the outer rim of the great ocean are the four inhabited landmasses, located at the {{Wiki|compass}} points: [[Pürvavideha]] in the [[east]], [[Jambudvïpa]] in the [[south]], [[Aparagodänïya]] in the [[west]], and [[Uttarakuru]] in the [[north]].
 +
 
 +
Five classes of [[beings]] inhabit the [[realm of desire]]: [[gods]] ([[devas]]), [[human beings]], [[animals]], [[ghosts]], and [[hell]] dwellers; sometimes a sixth category is added: [[asuras]] (or {{Wiki|demonic}} [[gods]]). The [[beings]] of lower [[spiritual]] levels dwell in the bottom part of this [[realm]]. [[Mount Meru]], encircled by the [[serpent]] [[kings]] ([[nãgas]]), rises above, and the [[gods]] inhabit the [[six heavens]] on top of it.  
 +
 
 +
[[Mount Meru]] thus connects both the [[heavens]] at the top and the [[hells]] at the bottom. Among the [[heavens]] the important ones are Träyastriméa, the abode of [[Indra]] (the [[god of gods]]), located directly above [[Mount Meru]]; and [[Tusita]], [[the fourth]] [[heaven]], where a [[bodhisattva]] is born immediately prior to being born as a [[buddha]]. On top of the [[realm of desire]] are the seventeen [[heavens]] of the [[realm of form]], and above that are the four "infinities" of the [[realm of formlessness]].
 +
 
 
This single-world system, also known as the cakravãla because of the circular {{Wiki|iron}} mountain that surrounds it, is the oldest [[Buddhist cosmology]]. In this [[cosmology]], the {{Wiki|drama}} of {{Wiki|salvation}} unfolds in [[cosmic]] time, measured in units of [[kalpas]], or [[eons]]. The {{Wiki|eschatological}} [[path]] is the [[transmigration]] of [[beings]] going through [[endless]] cycles of [[birth]] and [[rebirth]], with the goal of reaching ever higher levels of [[existence]] until [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[release]] (nirvãr.¿a) from the [[chain of causation]].  
 
This single-world system, also known as the cakravãla because of the circular {{Wiki|iron}} mountain that surrounds it, is the oldest [[Buddhist cosmology]]. In this [[cosmology]], the {{Wiki|drama}} of {{Wiki|salvation}} unfolds in [[cosmic]] time, measured in units of [[kalpas]], or [[eons]]. The {{Wiki|eschatological}} [[path]] is the [[transmigration]] of [[beings]] going through [[endless]] cycles of [[birth]] and [[rebirth]], with the goal of reaching ever higher levels of [[existence]] until [[Wikipedia:Absolute (philosophy)|ultimate]] [[release]] (nirvãr.¿a) from the [[chain of causation]].  
  
Because of this {{Wiki|emphasis}} on the {{Wiki|temporal}} scheme of {{Wiki|salvation}}, one of the early images associated with [[Buddhist cosmologies]] that survive in [[India]] focuses on the [[cycle of birth and rebirth]]. [[Monastic regulations]] instruct that [[a wheel]] of life/existence ([[bhavacakra]]) be represented in the entrance hall of each [[monastery]]; one of the earliest extant examples of this is a fresco in the porch section of {{Wiki|Cave}} 1 7 at Ajantä, which dates to the late fifth or early sixth century. Radially divided into six segments, the [[wheel]] depicts the [[six realms of existence]] ([[gods]], [[asuras]], [[human beings]], [[animals]], [[ghosts]], and [[hell]] dwellers) in the [[realm of desire]], hence reinforcing the [[chain of causation]] against the backdrop of the cyclical [[nature]] of [[cosmic]] time  Images of the [[wheel of life]] did not seem to have much impact on {{Wiki|mainstream}} {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist art]] but feature prominently in [[Tibetan art]], which also abounds in various types of cosmographic depictions  For example, a large [[wheel of life]] is depicted on the [[east]] wall of the entry hall (opposite a pictorial depiction of the [[cosmos]] on the [[west]] wall) of the [[Tabo Monastery]] in [[western Tibet]], which dates to the tenth century.  Deborah Klimburg-Salter interprets that "While the [[Wheel of Life]] describes the [[nature]] of [[samsara]], the different {{Wiki|cosmologies}} sought to define the {{Wiki|dimensions}} of the [[cosmos]]. Together they depict the [[microcosm]] and [[macrocosm]]. . . . Thus these images demarcated the boundary between the profane, outside [[world]], and the [[sacred]] world—the
+
Because of this {{Wiki|emphasis}} on the {{Wiki|temporal}} scheme of {{Wiki|salvation}}, one of the early images associated with [[Buddhist cosmologies]] that survive in [[India]] focuses on the [[cycle of birth and rebirth]]. [[Monastic regulations]] instruct that [[a wheel]] of life/existence ([[bhavacakra]]) be represented in the entrance hall of each [[monastery]]; one of the earliest extant examples of this is a fresco in the porch section of {{Wiki|Cave}} 1 7 at Ajantä, which dates to the late fifth or early sixth century.  
 +
 
 +
Radially divided into six segments, the [[wheel]] depicts the [[six realms of existence]] ([[gods]], [[asuras]], [[human beings]], [[animals]], [[ghosts]], and [[hell]] dwellers) in the [[realm of desire]], hence reinforcing the [[chain of causation]] against the backdrop of the cyclical [[nature]] of [[cosmic]] time  Images of the [[wheel of life]] did not seem to have much impact on {{Wiki|mainstream}} {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[Buddhist art]] but feature prominently in [[Tibetan art]], which also abounds in various types of cosmographic depictions   
 +
 
 +
For example, a large [[wheel of life]] is depicted on the [[east]] wall of the entry hall (opposite a pictorial depiction of the [[cosmos]] on the [[west]] wall) of the [[Tabo Monastery]] in [[western Tibet]], which dates to the tenth century.  Deborah Klimburg-Salter interprets that "While the [[Wheel of Life]] describes the [[nature]] of [[samsara]], the different {{Wiki|cosmologies}} sought to define the {{Wiki|dimensions}} of the [[cosmos]]. Together they depict the [[microcosm]] and [[macrocosm]]. . . . Thus these images demarcated the boundary between the profane, outside [[world]], and the [[sacred]] world—the
  
  
 
[[world]] of the [[mandala]] [the interior of the [[monastery]]] "11 The mural at [[Tabo Monastery]] seems to continue the [[Indian]] [[temple]]/ cave-temple [[tradition]], while the [[wheel of life]] is also a prominent theme in [[Tibetan]] [[thangkas]]. However, the theme of the [[wheel of life]] reached [[southwest]] [[China]] only in Song (960—1279) times in the [[Tantric]] context and was also depicted in the later periods. 12 It was probably through the context of [[esoteric Buddhism]] that the early [[Indian]] image of the [[wheel of life]] was introduced to [[China]] at this relatively late date.
 
[[world]] of the [[mandala]] [the interior of the [[monastery]]] "11 The mural at [[Tabo Monastery]] seems to continue the [[Indian]] [[temple]]/ cave-temple [[tradition]], while the [[wheel of life]] is also a prominent theme in [[Tibetan]] [[thangkas]]. However, the theme of the [[wheel of life]] reached [[southwest]] [[China]] only in Song (960—1279) times in the [[Tantric]] context and was also depicted in the later periods. 12 It was probably through the context of [[esoteric Buddhism]] that the early [[Indian]] image of the [[wheel of life]] was introduced to [[China]] at this relatively late date.
  
Since [[Buddhist cosmology]] is an ethicized [[universe]] that has [[moral]] bearings, the single-world system presents the higher [[forms]] of [[heavens]] at the top and the lower [[forms]] of [[hells]] at the bottom, against the backdrop of [[Mount Meru]] as the [[world]] axis. Thus in addition to the [[wheel of life]], which presents a scheme of {{Wiki|salvation}} in cyclical [[cosmic]] time, another [[soteriological]] scheme [[exists]] that involves ascending or descending on a vertical [[path]], with the stratified [[universe]] providing a field within which a being travels in stages on the long journey toward {{Wiki|salvation}} in a vertical/ {{Wiki|temporal}} [[dimension]]. Joseph E. Schwartzberg notes, "The implication of this, from a cartographic {{Wiki|perspective}}, is that the [[visual]] [[representation]] of the multi-dimensional [[universe]] in a two-dimensional image [i.e., a [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] map surface] sees it extended along a vertical rather than a horizontal plane." 13 This vertical format usually revolves around [[Mount Meru]] as its axis. A relatively late example is a fifteenth-century [[Buddhist]] map painted in [[Japan]], which illustrates this [[cosmology]] diagrammatically (fig. 3. I a—c). 14 The illustrator uses a bird's-eye view and a level view alternately to depict the geographical features and buildings of this [[universe]]. S/Vhen reaching the [[formless realm]], the illustrator simply uses geometric circles to indicate the four [[heavens]] (fig. 3. I b). Similar examples abound in [[Thailand]] and other cultures where [[Theravada Buddhism]] predominates.
+
Since [[Buddhist cosmology]] is an {{Wiki|ethicist}} [[universe]] that has [[moral]] bearings, the [[single-world system]] presents the higher [[forms]] of [[heavens]] at the top and the lower [[forms]] of [[hells]] at the bottom, against the backdrop of [[Mount Meru]] as the [[world]] axis. Thus in addition to the [[wheel of life]], which presents a scheme of {{Wiki|salvation}} in cyclical [[cosmic]] time, another [[soteriological]] scheme [[exists]] that involves ascending or descending on a vertical [[path]], with the stratified [[universe]] providing a field within which a being travels in stages on the long journey toward {{Wiki|salvation}} in a vertical/ {{Wiki|temporal}} [[dimension]].  
 +
 
 +
Joseph E. Schwartzberg notes, "The implication of this, from a cartographic {{Wiki|perspective}}, is that the [[visual]] [[representation]] of the multi-dimensional [[universe]] in a two-dimensional image [i.e., a [[Wikipedia:Convention (norm)|conventional]] map surface] sees it extended along a vertical rather than a horizontal plane." 13 This vertical format usually revolves around [[Mount Meru]] as its axis.  
 +
 
 +
A relatively late example is a fifteenth-century [[Buddhist]] map painted in [[Japan]], which illustrates this [[cosmology]] diagrammatically (fig. 3. I a—c).  
 +
The illustrator uses a bird's-eye view and a level view alternately to depict the geographical features and buildings of this [[universe]]. S/Vhen reaching the [[formless realm]], the illustrator simply uses geometric circles to indicate the four [[heavens]] (fig. 3. I b). Similar examples abound in [[Thailand]] and other cultures where [[Theravada Buddhism]] predominates.
  
 
The early images of the single-world [[cosmology]] found in [[China]], however, tend to be partial ones. Dating as early as the fifth and
 
The early images of the single-world [[cosmology]] found in [[China]], however, tend to be partial ones. Dating as early as the fifth and
Line 48: Line 86:
  
 
12 A prominent example is a relief carving of the [[wheel of life]] at Baodingshan; see Howard 2001: 6-10, fig. 9. see also Teiser 2006.
 
12 A prominent example is a relief carving of the [[wheel of life]] at Baodingshan; see Howard 2001: 6-10, fig. 9. see also Teiser 2006.
 +
 
13 Schwartzberg 1992a: 334.
 
13 Schwartzberg 1992a: 334.
 
Rosenfield et al. 1973: 104-109, map 5.
 
Rosenfield et al. 1973: 104-109, map 5.
 +
 
15 see Schwartzberg 1992c: 714—737, fig. 17.13.
 
15 see Schwartzberg 1992c: 714—737, fig. 17.13.
  
  
sixth century, the majority of them center on the depiction of [[Mount Meru]]. An example is the mural on the [[north]] slope of the ceiling of [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Cave}} 249, which dates to the [[Western]] [[Wei dynasty]] (535— 551; see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.2). The ceiling of the cave-chapel is shaped like a truncated pyramid, with some resemblance to the local vaulted tombs dating to the Han and Jin (265—420) periods. Murals on the vaulted ceilings of these tombs usually portray the [[heavenly realm]] inhabited by [[celestial]] [[symbols]], [[deities]] (most prominently the cultic figure of the [[Queen Mother of the West]]), [[spirits]], and [[immortals]]. In {{Wiki|Cave}} 249, we find a commingling of [[Indian]] and {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[heavenly]] figures and motifs. The center of the [[north]] mural is dominated by an hour-glass-shaped [[Mount Meru]] that emerges from the ocean and {{Wiki|mountain ranges}} at the bottom and soars to the top of the ceiling.  
+
sixth century, the majority of them center on the depiction of [[Mount Meru]]. An example is the mural on the [[north]] slope of the ceiling of [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Cave}} 249, which dates to the [[Western]] [[Wei dynasty]] (535— 551; see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.2). The ceiling of the cave-chapel is shaped like a truncated pyramid, with some resemblance to the local vaulted tombs dating to the Han and Jin (265—420) periods.
  
 +
Murals on the vaulted ceilings of these tombs usually portray the [[heavenly realm]] inhabited by [[celestial]] [[symbols]], [[deities]] (most prominently the cultic figure of the [[Queen Mother of the West]]), [[spirits]], and [[immortals]]. In {{Wiki|Cave}} 249, we find a commingling of [[Indian]] and {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[heavenly]] figures and motifs. The center of the [[north]] mural is dominated by an hour-glass-shaped [[Mount Meru]] that emerges from the ocean and {{Wiki|mountain ranges}} at the bottom and soars to the top of the ceiling.
 +
 +
 +
Guarding it in front is the dark-skinned {{Wiki|demonic}} [[god]] [[Asura]], who has four [[eyes]] and holds the {{Wiki|sun}} and the [[moon]] in two of his four hands. The summit of [[Mount Meru]] is rendered as a series of overlapping [[mountains]] in a palette of blue, brown, and beige. Above is a palace within a walled enclosure and gates, representing Träyastrimša, the court of [[Indra]].
 +
 +
On two sides of [[Asura]] are a panoply of [[spirits]]: to the left are the [[thunder]] [[god]] (surrounded by a string of revolving [[drums]]) and the {{Wiki|lightning}} monster (who holds a wedge shaped implement); to the right are the [[wind]] [[god]] (with his [[wind]] bag) and the [[rain]] [[god]] (who blows [[rain]]).
 +
 +
These storm [[gods]] are well-known [[nature spirits]] of {{Wiki|Chinese}} origin, as are the winged [[immortals]] and hybrid creatures depicted in the mural. In the middle tier, however, the kinara (human-headed bird) and the aPsaras ([[heavenly beings]] with flying scarves), to the left and right of [[Asura]], are associated with the [[Buddhist]] [[realm]].
 +
 +
At the bottom, there are also [[bodhisattvas]] practicing within buildings. This configuration of a [[heavenly realm]] within the [[Buddhist]] cave-chapel thus accommodates both indigenous {{Wiki|Chinese}} and [[Indian Buddhist]] conceptions of the [[cosmos]], inhabited by [[spirits]] and [[beings]] from both [[traditions]]. The other three quadrants of the ceiling murals show a similar mix of {{Wiki|Chinese}} and foreign motifs, although the identification of some figures remains in dispute.16
  
Guarding it in front is the dark-skinned {{Wiki|demonic}} [[god]] [[Asura]], who has four [[eyes]] and holds the {{Wiki|sun}} and the [[moon]] in two of his four hands. The summit of [[Mount Meru]] is rendered as a series of overlapping [[mountains]] in a palette of blue, brown, and beige. Above is a palace within a walled enclosure and gates, representing Träyastrimša, the court of [[Indra]]. On two sides of [[Asura]] are a panoply of [[spirits]]: to the left are the [[thunder]] [[god]] (surrounded by a string of revolving [[drums]]) and the {{Wiki|lightning}} monster (who holds a wedgeshaped implement); to the right are the [[wind]] [[god]] (with his [[wind]] bag) and the [[rain]] [[god]] (who blows [[rain]]). These storm [[gods]] are well-known [[nature spirits]] of {{Wiki|Chinese}} origin, as are the winged [[immortals]] and hybrid creatures depicted in the mural. In the middle tier, however, the kinara (human-headed bird) and the aPsaras ([[heavenly beings]] with flying scarves), to the left and right of [[Asura]], are associated with the [[Buddhist]] [[realm]]. At the bottom, there are also [[bodhisattvas]] practicing within buildings. This configuration of a [[heavenly realm]] within the [[Buddhist]] cave-chapel thus accommodates both indigenous {{Wiki|Chinese}} and [[Indian Buddhist]] conceptions of the [[cosmos]], inhabited by [[spirits]] and [[beings]] from both [[traditions]]. The other three quadrants of the ceiling murals show a similar mix of {{Wiki|Chinese}} and foreign motifs, although the identification of some figures remains in dispute.16
 
 
{{Wiki|Cave}} 249 is an [[extraordinary]] example of how, at this early stage, associated with both {{Wiki|Chinese}} and [[Indian]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} already intermingled and coexisted. In other instances [[Mount Meru]] appears
 
{{Wiki|Cave}} 249 is an [[extraordinary]] example of how, at this early stage, associated with both {{Wiki|Chinese}} and [[Indian]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} already intermingled and coexisted. In other instances [[Mount Meru]] appears
  
 
16 See Bush 1974: 36—37; [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Academy}} 1980—82, part 1: pl. 97.
 
16 See Bush 1974: 36—37; [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Academy}} 1980—82, part 1: pl. 97.
 
   
 
   
Fig. 3. la. Upper part of [[Buddhist]] map in figure 3. la, showing the four [[heavens]] in the formlcss [[realm]] as [[empty]] circles. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sacklcr Museum, [[Harvard University]] [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
+
Fig. 3. la. Upper part of [[Buddhist]] map in figure 3. la, showing the four [[heavens]] in the [[formless realm]] as [[empty]] circles. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sacklcr Museum, [[Harvard University]] [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
 +
 
 
Fig. 3. lb. Lower part of [[Buddhist]] map, illustrated by [[monk]] Ryüyü. [[Japanese]], [[Muromachi period]] (1392—1573), dated 1402. Handscroll, ink and {{Wiki|color}} on paper. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, [[Harvard University]] [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
 
Fig. 3. lb. Lower part of [[Buddhist]] map, illustrated by [[monk]] Ryüyü. [[Japanese]], [[Muromachi period]] (1392—1573), dated 1402. Handscroll, ink and {{Wiki|color}} on paper. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, [[Harvard University]] [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
 
Fig. 3.1c. Detail of figure 3. la, showing the base of [[Mount Meru]]. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, {{Wiki|Harvard}} Univcrsity [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
 
Fig. 3.1c. Detail of figure 3. la, showing the base of [[Mount Meru]]. [[Courtesy]] of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, {{Wiki|Harvard}} Univcrsity [[Art]] Museums, Hofer Collection.
  
in a less hybridized context, as shown in relief on a number of [[Buddhist]] steles. 17 [[Mount Meru]] is also featured on the robe of a specific type of [[buddha]] identified as either [[Vairocana]] or the [[Cosmological]] [[Buddha]]. 18 In these examples, [[Mount Meru]] serves as a backdrop for the depiction of the encompassing [[universe]] described on the robe of the [[Buddha]] as the lord of the [[universe]]. The [[idea]] of mapping the [[universe]] onto a person's body—and hence the identification of the [[macrocosmic]] and the microcosmic—is rooted in the {{Wiki|ancient Indian}} {{Wiki|concept}} of the [[primordial]] or [[cosmic]] man (puru§a) eulogized in [[Vedic literature]], and in the depiction of {{Wiki|Visnu}} in [[Hindu]] [[art]].  After all, the [[deification]] of the [[Buddha]] also stems from the {{Wiki|concept}} of mahãPurusa (great [[person]]). The [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]], a developed [[Mahãyãna]] text, describes the [[cosmic]] or [[transcendent buddha]] [[Vairocana]] as being interchangeable with the [[universe]] itself (see below). The {{Wiki|kingdom}} of [[wikipedia:Khotan|Khotan]] on the southern [[Silk Route]] was a known [[Buddhist]] center associated with the creation and dissemination of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]]. Among extant examples of {{Wiki|Khotanese}} mural paintings there is an example of [[Vairocana]], whose [[body]] is adorned with images of [[Mount Meru]] (or [[symbolically]] the [[Mount Meru]] [[throne]]) and other [[cosmic]] [[emblems]]  Apparently in a [[Tantric]] context, this {{Wiki|Khotanese}} example attests to the widespread [[representation]] of this specific iconographic type, albeit in different styles and contexts.
+
in a less hybridized context, as shown in relief on a number of [[Buddhist]] steles. [[Mount Meru]] is also featured on the robe of a specific type of [[buddha]] identified as either [[Vairocana]] or the [[Cosmological]] [[Buddha]]. In these examples, [[Mount Meru]] serves as a backdrop for the depiction of the encompassing [[universe]] described on the robe of the [[Buddha]] as the lord of the [[universe]]. The [[idea]] of mapping the [[universe]] onto a person's body—and hence the identification of the [[macrocosmic]] and the microcosmic—is rooted in the {{Wiki|ancient Indian}} {{Wiki|concept}} of the [[primordial]] or [[cosmic]] man (puru§a) eulogized in [[Vedic literature]], and in the depiction of {{Wiki|Visnu}} in [[Hindu]] [[art]].   
 +
 
 +
After all, the [[deification]] of the [[Buddha]] also stems from the {{Wiki|concept}} of mahãPurusa (great [[person]]). The [[Avatamsaka Sütra]], a developed [[Mahãyãna]] text, describes the [[cosmic]] or [[transcendent buddha]] [[Vairocana]] as being interchangeable with the [[universe]] itself (see below).  
 +
 
 +
The {{Wiki|kingdom}} of [[wikipedia:Khotan|Khotan]] on the southern [[Silk Route]] was a known [[Buddhist]] center associated with the creation and dissemination of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]]. Among extant examples of {{Wiki|Khotanese}} mural paintings there is an example of [[Vairocana]], whose [[body]] is adorned with images of [[Mount Meru]] (or [[symbolically]] the [[Mount Meru]] [[throne]]) and other [[cosmic]] [[emblems]]  Apparently in a [[Tantric]] context, this {{Wiki|Khotanese}} example attests to the widespread [[representation]] of this specific iconographic type, albeit in different styles and contexts.
  
 
Also related to the single-world [[cosmology]] are depictions of specific localities in the [[heavens]], usually because of associations with [[sacred]] events or [[deity]] {{Wiki|cults}}. Trãyastriméa, the abode of [[Indra]] on the summit of [[Mount Meru]], is associated with one of the famous events in {{Wiki|legends}} of the [[Buddha's life]], for [[Gautama Buddha]] visited this [[heaven]] to {{Wiki|preach}} the [[Abhidharma]] to his mother, who had been born there as a [[deva]]. The [[Buddha]] traveled the distance of 68,000 [[yojanas]] between the [[earth]] and Trãyastriméa in three strides, at Sañkïsa. This celebrated event is depicted in early [[Buddhist art]], such as on a pillar of the [[north]] gateway of Säñcï Stüpa l , dating to the first century
 
Also related to the single-world [[cosmology]] are depictions of specific localities in the [[heavens]], usually because of associations with [[sacred]] events or [[deity]] {{Wiki|cults}}. Trãyastriméa, the abode of [[Indra]] on the summit of [[Mount Meru]], is associated with one of the famous events in {{Wiki|legends}} of the [[Buddha's life]], for [[Gautama Buddha]] visited this [[heaven]] to {{Wiki|preach}} the [[Abhidharma]] to his mother, who had been born there as a [[deva]]. The [[Buddha]] traveled the distance of 68,000 [[yojanas]] between the [[earth]] and Trãyastriméa in three strides, at Sañkïsa. This celebrated event is depicted in early [[Buddhist art]], such as on a pillar of the [[north]] gateway of Säñcï Stüpa l , dating to the first century
Line 72: Line 126:
 
BCE.  In the relief, a vertical ladder connects [[heaven]] and [[earth]], implying the [[Buddha's]] descent from Trãyastriméa; the [[Buddha]] is not shown, but his presence is suggested by his [[throne]] and the [[bodhi tree]] at both ends of the ladder. The absence of an image of the [[Buddha]] has been ascribed to the "{{Wiki|aniconic}} phase" of early [[Buddhist art]]. Alternately, some [[art]] {{Wiki|historians}} argue that such a depiction does not portray the [[Buddha's]] presence but commemorates the [[sacred]] site that is also a focus of [[pilgrimage]].
 
BCE.  In the relief, a vertical ladder connects [[heaven]] and [[earth]], implying the [[Buddha's]] descent from Trãyastriméa; the [[Buddha]] is not shown, but his presence is suggested by his [[throne]] and the [[bodhi tree]] at both ends of the ladder. The absence of an image of the [[Buddha]] has been ascribed to the "{{Wiki|aniconic}} phase" of early [[Buddhist art]]. Alternately, some [[art]] {{Wiki|historians}} argue that such a depiction does not portray the [[Buddha's]] presence but commemorates the [[sacred]] site that is also a focus of [[pilgrimage]].
 
    
 
    
Another locality often shown is [[Tusita Heaven]], [[the fourth]] [[heaven]] in the [[realm of desire]] and the abode of [[Maitreya Bodhisattva]], the [[Buddha of the Future]] Age designated to succeed Sãkyamuni. [[Maitreya]] is one of the oldest devotional [[deities]] in [[Buddhism]], for his {{Wiki|cult}} arose around the same time [[Sakyamuni Buddha]] began to be represented in {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[form]] at the beginning of the [[Common Era]]. [[Maitreya Bodhisattva]] is said to reside in [[Tusita Heaven]], practicing and preaching while waiting to be [[reborn]] in the {{Wiki|ideal}} {{Wiki|kingdom}} of Ketumatï. Ketumatï represents a kind of utopia where all the [[conditions]] are right. There [[Maitreya]] will gain [[enlightenment]] as a [[buddha]] and hold three assemblies at which countless [[beings]] will gain {{Wiki|salvation}}. Since the career of [[Maitreya]] stands for that of the prototypical [[bodhisattva]], [[Tusita]] is where all [[bodhisattvas]] reside before their [[rebirth]] as [[buddhas]]. The {{Wiki|cult}} of [[Maitreya]] was prominent because of its messianic appeal; besides, the promise of {{Wiki|salvation}} in a {{Wiki|future}} {{Wiki|era}} tied into the [[soteriological]] scheme unfolding in [[cosmic]] time in early [[Buddhist cosmology]]. This {{Wiki|cult}} spread, in the early centuries of the [[Common Era]], from [[India]] through {{Wiki|Central Asia}} to [[China]] as well as [[Korea]] and [[Japan]].  Images of [[Maitreya]] ensconced in the palatial [[architecture]] of [[Tusita Heaven]] appear in Gandhäran {{Wiki|sculpture}} of the third and fourth centuries (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.3), and such images were transmitted to [[China]] along the [[Silk Road]], with examples found in the cave-chapels of Kyzil and Kumtara. When these images reached [[China]], however, the [[Indian]] architectural [[forms]] with an arch and 62
+
Another locality often shown is [[Tusita Heaven]], [[the fourth]] [[heaven]] in the [[realm of desire]] and the abode of [[Maitreya Bodhisattva]], the [[Buddha of the Future]] Age designated to succeed [[Sãkyamuni]]. [[Maitreya]] is one of the oldest devotional [[deities]] in [[Buddhism]], for his {{Wiki|cult}} arose around the same time [[Sakyamuni Buddha]] began to be represented in {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[form]] at the beginning of the [[Common Era]]. [[Maitreya Bodhisattva]] is said to reside in [[Tusita Heaven]], practicing and preaching while waiting to be [[reborn]] in the {{Wiki|ideal}} {{Wiki|kingdom}} of [[Ketumatï]].  
 +
 
 +
[[[Ketumatï]] represents a kind of utopia where all the [[conditions]] are right. There [[Maitreya]] will gain [[enlightenment]] as a [[buddha]] and hold three assemblies at which countless [[beings]] will gain {{Wiki|salvation}}. Since the career of [[Maitreya]] stands for that of the prototypical [[bodhisattva]], [[Tusita]] is where all [[bodhisattvas]] reside before their [[rebirth]] as [[buddhas]]. The {{Wiki|cult}} of [[Maitreya]] was prominent because of its messianic appeal; besides, the promise of {{Wiki|salvation}} in a {{Wiki|future}} {{Wiki|era}} tied into the [[soteriological]] scheme unfolding in [[cosmic]] time in early [[Buddhist cosmology]].  
 +
 
 +
This {{Wiki|cult}} spread, in the early centuries of the [[Common Era]], from [[India]] through {{Wiki|Central Asia}} to [[China]] as well as [[Korea]] and [[Japan]].  Images of [[Maitreya]] ensconced in the palatial [[architecture]] of [[Tusita Heaven]] appear in Gandhäran {{Wiki|sculpture}} of the third and fourth centuries (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.3), and such images were transmitted to [[China]] along the [[Silk Road]], with examples found in the cave-chapels of Kyzil and Kumtara. When these images reached [[China]], however, the [[Indian]] architectural [[forms]] with an arch and 62
 +
 
 +
columns were interpreted in local architectural terms. For example, a relief {{Wiki|sculpture}} of [[Maitreya Bodhisattva]] in [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Cave}} 275, dating to the fifth century, shows the [[bodhisattva]] in his typical crossankled seated position, enshrined in a niche marked by que gates to suggest the {{Wiki|palaces}} in [[Tusita Heaven]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.4). Qge gates denote palatial or funerary compounds in Han [[architecture]], and this adjustment to employ a local [[architecture]] [[symbol]] is another example of the acclimatization of foreign images. 
 +
 
  
columns were interpreted in local architectural terms. For example, a relief {{Wiki|sculpture}} of [[Maitreya]] Bodhsattva in [[Dunhuang]] {{Wiki|Cave}} 275, dating to the fifth century, shows the [[bodhisattva]] in his typical crossankled seated position, enshrined in a niche marked by que gates to suggest the {{Wiki|palaces}} in [[Tusita Heaven]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.4). Qge gates denote palatial or funerary compounds in Han [[architecture]], and this adjustment to employ a local [[architecture]] [[symbol]] is another example of the acclimatization of foreign images. 
+
===The [[Multiple-World System]]===
  
  
The Multiple- [[World]] System
+
The [[cosmology]] of [[innumerable worlds]] represents a grandiose [[cosmic]] {{Wiki|structure}} envisioned in [[Mahãyãna]] [[Buddhism]]. Beyond the perimeter of the single-world system, {{Wiki|innumerable}} [[world]] systems are [[thought]] to be distributed throughout the ten regions of [[space]]. This expansion from one to multiple [[worlds]] was concurrent with the [[development]] from one to numerous [[buddhas]] in [[Mahäyãna]] [[belief]], {{Wiki|emphasizing}} the themes of multiplicity and plurality. Each [[world]] system is presided over by a [[buddha]], and is called a [[buddhafield]] or [[buddha land]]
  
 +
([[buddha]] [[kshetras]]). In contrast to the {{Wiki|emphasis}} on [[cosmic]] time in the preMahãyäna [[cosmology]], [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} accentuate the {{Wiki|drama}} of {{Wiki|salvation}} in [[cosmic]] [[space]], accessible in the numerous [[buddhafields]] dispersed in vast expanses of [[space]].
 +
There are three types of [[buddha-fields]]: [[pure]], impure, and mixed. A [[buddhafield]] is a [[sphere]], a place that becomes [[pure]] and {{Wiki|ideal}} because of a [[buddha's]] [[purification]] work through his [[vows]] and [[deeds]]. When a [[world]] is adorned, and thus "ornamented" (alamkãra), with the fruit of a [[buddha's]] [[good deeds]], it becomes a [[pure land]].
  
The [[cosmology]] of [[innumerable worlds]] represents a grandiose [[cosmic]] {{Wiki|structure}} envisioned in [[Mahãyãna]] [[Buddhism]]. Beyond the perimeter of the single-world system, {{Wiki|innumerable}} [[world]] systems are [[thought]] to be distributed throughout the ten regions of [[space]]. This expansion from one to multiple [[worlds]] was concurrent with the [[development]] from one to numerous [[buddhas]] in Mahäyãna [[belief]], {{Wiki|emphasizing}} the themes of multiplicity and plurality. Each [[world]] system is presided over by a [[buddha]], and is called a [[buddha-field]] or [[buddha land]]
+
Geographically {{Wiki|speaking}}, [[human beings]] live on the [[southern continent]] of Jambudvïpa, but this [[realm]] is also defined in terms of its level of [[purity]], and is known as the [[sahä world]] (sahãloka). The [[sahã world]] is the most important of impure lands. It is impure because the [[beings]] there are still chained to the laws of [[causation]] and are [[subject]] to [[transmigration]]. It is also the abode of {{Wiki|demons}} and other kinds of troublemakers that [[cause]] adverse events, Yet in the [[Mahayana]]  
  
(buddhaksetras). In contrast to the {{Wiki|emphasis}} on [[cosmic]] time in the preMahãyäna [[cosmology]], [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|cosmologies}} accentuate the {{Wiki|drama}} of {{Wiki|salvation}} in [[cosmic]] [[space]], accessible in the numerous [[buddhafields]] dispersed in vast expanses of [[space]].
+
scheme, the [[sahã world]] is the "land of [[transformation]]" where [[Säkyamuni Buddha]] dwells and in which all [[beings]] are [[transformed]]. Thus the sahã [[world]] is considered mixed, alternately ornamented ([[pure]]) and unornamented (impure). This allows for the presence of [[great bodhisattvas]] who can act and save [[suffering]] [[beings]] there.
There are three types of [[buddha-fields]]: [[pure]], impure, and mixed. A [[buddha-field]] is a [[sphere]], a place that becomes [[pure]] and {{Wiki|ideal}} because of a [[buddha's]] [[purification]] work through his [[vows]] and [[deeds]]. When a [[world]] is adorned, and thus "ornamented" (alamkãra), with the fruit of a [[buddha's]] [[good deeds]], it becomes a [[pure land]].
 
  
Geographically {{Wiki|speaking}}, [[human beings]] live on the [[southern continent]] of Jambudvïpa, but this [[realm]] is also defined in terms of its level of [[purity]], and is known as the sahä [[world]] (sahãloka). The sahã [[world]] is the most important of impure lands. It is impure because the [[beings]] there are still chained to the laws of [[causation]] and are [[subject]] to [[transmigration]]. It is also the abode of {{Wiki|demons}} and other kinds of troublemakers that [[cause]] adverse events, Yet in the [[Mahayana]]  
+
Both in [[Buddhist texts]] and in mural paintings, the sahã [[world]] provides the settings for jätakas ("[[birth stories]]"), avadãnas ("great [[deeds]]"), the [[Buddha's life]] events, and the [[Buddha's]] [[sermons]] (such as at [[Vulture's Peak]], where the [[Buddha]] expounded the [[Lotus]] [[Sütra]]), as well as the [[abodes]] of the [[great bodhisattvas]], such as [[Mount Wutai]] of Mañjuérï and [[Mount Potalaka]] of Avalokiteévara.
  
scheme, the sahã [[world]] is the "land of [[transformation]]" where Säkyamuni [[Buddha]] dwells and in which all [[beings]] are [[transformed]]. Thus the sahã [[world]] is considered mixed, alternately ornamented ([[pure]]) and unornamented (impure). This allows for the presence of [[great bodhisattvas]] who can act and save [[suffering]] [[beings]] there.
+
In addition, there are the stories in various [[sutras]] that occur in the sahä [[world]]. Within this varied [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}}, one can distinguish two categories: (l) stories that have strong {{Wiki|narrative}} content and involve both {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial {{Wiki|dimensions}}, and (2) descriptions of the [[sacred]] [[abodes]] of [[deities]] that embody [[transcendent]] time. The former are represented in the {{Wiki|narrative}} mode while the [[latter]] are often presented in the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode or as a panorama (see [[discussion]] below
Both in [[Buddhist texts]] and in mural paintings, the sahã [[world]] provides the settings for jätakas ("[[birth stories]]"), avadãnas ("great [[deeds]]"), the [[Buddha's life]] events, and the [[Buddha's]] [[sermons]] (such as at [[Vulture's Peak]], where the [[Buddha]] expounded the [[Lotus]] [[Sütra]]), as well as the [[abodes]] of the [[great bodhisattvas]], such as [[Mount Wutai]] of Mañjuérï and [[Mount Potalaka]] of Avalokiteévara. In addition, there are the stories in various [[sutras]] that occur in the sahä [[world]]. Within this varied [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}}, one can distinguish two categories: (l) stories that have strong {{Wiki|narrative}} content and involve both {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial {{Wiki|dimensions}}, and (2) descriptions of the [[sacred]] [[abodes]] of [[deities]] that embody [[transcendent]] time. The former are
 
represented in the {{Wiki|narrative}} mode while the [[latter]] are often presented in the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode or as a panorama (see [[discussion]] below
 
The most prominent [[pure land]] is Sukhãvatï, the [[Western Pure Land]] of Amitãbha/Amitãyus (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.5). It is a [[land of bliss]], and the [[living beings]] there have neither [[physical]] nor [[mental pain]]. As an adorned place of [[spiritual]] splendor, its features are {{Wiki|distinct}} from those of the sahã [[world]]. The ground is level and is enclosed on every side by seven railings and seven rows of {{Wiki|palm trees}}, all decked out with nets of tinkling [[bells]]. [[Lotus]] ponds are covered with {{Wiki|gold}} sand, contain [[water]] that is cool, clear, fragrant, and are afloat with [[lotuses]]. The railings, ground, and ponds are all made of [[precious]] {{Wiki|substances}}: {{Wiki|gold}}, {{Wiki|silver}}, {{Wiki|emerald}}, {{Wiki|rock crystal}}, [[Wikipedia:Ruby|red pearl]], {{Wiki|sapphire}}, and [[mother-of-pearl]]. [[Heavenly beings]] and birds perform [[music]] and songs, while [[flower]] blossoms shower down regularly, [[bells]] [[chime]], and cool breezes blow. [[Beings]] [[reborn]] there are endowed with a multitude of [[virtues]] and enjoy fine garments, ornaments, [[gardens]], {{Wiki|palaces}}, and pavilions. They can freely travel to other [[buddha lands]] and return, while the [[Buddhas of the Ten Directions]] come to glorify Amitãbha [[Buddha]] in flying pavilions. Pertaining to the {{Wiki|concept}} of alamkãra, or ornament, the [[sensuous]] images of [[sight]], [[sound]], {{Wiki|smell}} and {{Wiki|touch}} are {{Wiki|metaphors}} for the panoply of wondrous qualities of a [[pure land]].
 
  
 +
The most prominent [[pure land]] is Sukhãvatï, the [[Western Pure Land]] of [[Amitãbha]]/[[Amitãyus]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.5). It is a [[land of bliss]], and the [[living beings]] there have neither [[physical]] nor [[mental pain]]. As an adorned place of [[spiritual]] splendor, its features are {{Wiki|distinct}} from those of the [[sahã world]]. The ground is level and is enclosed on every side by seven railings and seven rows of {{Wiki|palm trees}}, all decked out with nets of tinkling [[bells]]. [[Lotus]] ponds are covered with {{Wiki|gold}} sand, contain [[water]] that is cool, clear, fragrant, and are afloat with [[lotuses]].
  
Depictions of the Sahã [[World]] and [[Pure Lands]]
+
The railings, ground, and ponds are all made of [[precious]] {{Wiki|substances}}: {{Wiki|gold}}, {{Wiki|silver}}, {{Wiki|emerald}}, {{Wiki|rock crystal}}, [[Wikipedia:Ruby|red pearl]], {{Wiki|sapphire}}, and [[mother-of-pearl]]. [[Heavenly beings]] and birds perform [[music]] and songs, while [[flower]] blossoms shower down regularly, [[bells]] [[chime]], and cool breezes blow. [[Beings]] [[reborn]] there are endowed with a multitude of [[virtues]] and enjoy fine garments, ornaments, [[gardens]], {{Wiki|palaces}}, and pavilions. They can freely travel to other [[buddha lands]] and return, while the [[Buddhas of the Ten Directions]] come to glorify Amitãbha [[Buddha]] in flying pavilions. Pertaining to the {{Wiki|concept}} of [[alamkãra]], or ornament, the [[sensuous]] images of [[sight]], [[sound]], {{Wiki|smell}} and {{Wiki|touch}} are {{Wiki|metaphors}} for the panoply of wondrous qualities of a [[pure land]].
  
  
The topography of the sahã [[world]] includes [[mountains]], valleys, [[rivers]], and groupings of [[human]] communities in cities and villages. Because this is the [[world]] where [[humans]] live, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} largely drew on preexisting artistic conventions to describe its features. Since the {{Wiki|Han dynasty}}, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} have devised the parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} to portray pictorial [[space]]. For example, on a Han tomb tile of a feast scene from [[Sichuan]], this {{Wiki|perspective}} is articulated through the {{Wiki|orthogonal}} lines of rectangular [[objects]] such as floor mats and tables (fig. 3.6). The baselines of these [[objects]] are presumably aligned with the picture base, so the parallel inclination of their sides suggests an upwardly tilted ground plane, which in turn {{Wiki|signifies}} extension into [[space]] beyond the picture plane. As the orthogonals slant upward, figures in the distance are depicted above those in the foreground. This way of disposing formal [[elements]] in a believable [[space]] is widespread in Han pictorial [[art]].
+
===Depictions of the [[Sahã World]] and [[Pure Lands]]===
  
Since the sahã [[world]] and the [[pure lands]] are {{Wiki|distinctive}} in their features, {{Wiki|artists}} devised ways to distinguish these two types of [[worlds]] pictorially. One of the rare examples for examining these two modes of [[representation]] is the relief on the back of a stele from [[Sichuan]]. Found in the Wanfosi [[temple]] site in {{Wiki|Chengdu}}, [[Sichuan]], the stele features two [[bodhisattvas]] in high relief on the front, and low-relief carvings on the back that include a complex landscape scene at the bottom and a [[pure land]] scene at the top (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.7). Dating to the sixth century, this represents one of the earliest depictions of a [[pure land]], [[offering]] a rare glimpse into the beginnings of the new genre of [[pure land]] [[imagery]] that developed in [[China]].   
+
 
 +
The topography of the sahã [[world]] includes [[mountains]], valleys, [[rivers]], and groupings of [[human]] communities in cities and villages. Because this is the [[world]] where [[humans]] live, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} largely drew on preexisting artistic conventions to describe its features. Since the {{Wiki|Han dynasty}}, {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} have devised the parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} to portray pictorial [[space]].
 +
 
 +
For example, on a Han tomb tile of a feast scene from [[Sichuan]], this {{Wiki|perspective}} is articulated through the {{Wiki|orthogonal}} lines of rectangular [[objects]] such as floor mats and tables (fig. 3.6).
 +
 
 +
The baselines of these [[objects]] are presumably aligned with the picture base, so the parallel inclination of their sides suggests an upwardly tilted ground plane, which in turn {{Wiki|signifies}} extension into [[space]] beyond the picture plane. As the orthogonals slant upward, figures in the distance are depicted above those in the foreground. This way of disposing formal [[elements]] in a believable [[space]] is widespread in Han pictorial [[art]].
 +
 
 +
Since the sahã [[world]] and the [[pure lands]] are {{Wiki|distinctive}} in their features, {{Wiki|artists}} devised ways to distinguish these two types of [[worlds]] pictorially. One of the rare examples for examining these two modes of [[representation]] is the relief on the back of a stele from [[Sichuan]]. Found in the Wanfosi [[temple]] site in {{Wiki|Chengdu}},  
 +
 
 +
[[Sichuan]], the stele features two [[bodhisattvas]] in high relief on the front, and low-relief carvings on the back that include a complex landscape scene at the bottom and a [[pure land]] scene at the top (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.7). Dating to the sixth century, this represents one of the earliest depictions of a [[pure land]], [[offering]] a rare glimpse into the beginnings of the new genre of [[pure land]] [[imagery]] that developed in [[China]].  
 +
   
 
The relief in the lower section features a number of scenes with figures and various [[actions]] set in a landscape of rolling hills, seashore, and overlapping [[mountains]]. A bridge in the center links the landscape section to the scene above, which clearly shows the [[iconography]] of a prototypical [[pure land]]: a [[lotus]] pond with [[reborn]] [[beings]] swimming in it, and across the pond a hieratic [[buddha's]] assembly, 65
 
The relief in the lower section features a number of scenes with figures and various [[actions]] set in a landscape of rolling hills, seashore, and overlapping [[mountains]]. A bridge in the center links the landscape section to the scene above, which clearly shows the [[iconography]] of a prototypical [[pure land]]: a [[lotus]] pond with [[reborn]] [[beings]] swimming in it, and across the pond a hieratic [[buddha's]] assembly, 65
  
 
Fig. 3.6. Tomb tile showing feasting and {{Wiki|entertainment}} scene, {{Wiki|Chengdu}}, [[Sichuan]]. {{Wiki|Chinese}}, [[Eastern Han]] period (25—220 CE). Zhongguo meishu quanji weiyuanhui, ed., Zhongguo meishu quanji, Han huaxiangshi huaxiangzhuan vol. {{Wiki|Beijing}} 1988: pl. 241.
 
Fig. 3.6. Tomb tile showing feasting and {{Wiki|entertainment}} scene, {{Wiki|Chengdu}}, [[Sichuan]]. {{Wiki|Chinese}}, [[Eastern Han]] period (25—220 CE). Zhongguo meishu quanji weiyuanhui, ed., Zhongguo meishu quanji, Han huaxiangshi huaxiangzhuan vol. {{Wiki|Beijing}} 1988: pl. 241.
lush vegetation, and palace [[architecture]]. Despite a number of speculations, there is no {{Wiki|evidence}} to firmly identify the [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}} of the {{Wiki|narrative}} scenes. However, I have argued that the landscape relief depicts the sahã [[world]]. It includes scenes of [[human]] travails and adversity, such as shipwreck and being attacked by {{Wiki|demons}}; but it also portrays [[religious]] [[activities]], such as taking the [[bodhisattva vow]], worshipping the [[Buddha]], and a [[stupa]]. The [[path]] of [[spiritual practice]] is also a [[path]] of transformative [[action]] that leads to the possibility of [[rebirth]] in the [[pure land]], [[symbolically]] represented by the bridge that links the two [[sections]]. The pictorial relief thus presents a [[vision]] of a
+
lush vegetation, and palace [[architecture]]. Despite a number of speculations, there is no {{Wiki|evidence}} to firmly identify the [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}} of the {{Wiki|narrative}} scenes.  
[[soteriological]] scheme: the [[human]] [[condition]], a program of [[spiritual practice]], and the [[attainment]] of a [[religious]] goal.
 
  
 +
However, I have argued that the landscape relief depicts the sahã [[world]]. It includes scenes of [[human]] travails and adversity, such as shipwreck and being attacked by {{Wiki|demons}}; but it also portrays [[religious]] [[activities]], such as taking the [[bodhisattva vow]], worshipping the [[Buddha]], and a [[stupa]]. The [[path]] of [[spiritual practice]] is also a [[path]] of transformative [[action]] that leads to the possibility of [[rebirth]] in the [[pure land]], [[symbolically]] represented by the bridge that links the two [[sections]]. The pictorial relief thus presents a [[vision]] of a[[soteriological]] scheme: the [[human]] [[condition]], a program of [[spiritual practice]], and the [[attainment]] of a [[religious]] goal.
 +
 +
 +
This portrayal of the sahã [[world]] follows the {{Wiki|naturalistic}} [[tradition]] of Han [[art]] in [[Sichuan]]. Depicted from a bird's-eye point of view, the [[mountains]] and valleys are shown on a tilted ground plane. Their silhouettes overlap and are then internally modeled, creating a succession of planes that give the [[illusion]] of spatial depth.
 +
 +
However, instead of the Han {{Wiki|perspective}} of parallel orthogonals projecting in one [[direction]], the [[mountains]] with winding [[paths]] draw one's gaze upward along the relief to focus on the [[buddha's]] assembly in the top center. This mode of {{Wiki|perspective}} construction is even more clearly shown in the [[pure land]] scene above.
 +
 +
Instead of one set of orthogonals receding into the distance in only one [[direction]], two sets of {{Wiki|orthogonal}} lines proceed symmetrically from the sides, converging on the central axis at several points. The [[intention]] is to focus the viewer's [[eye]] and [[attention]] on the central icon of Amitãbha [[Buddha]] presiding over the [[Western Pure Land]]. The [[bridges]], the rows of [[trees]], the [[listeners]], and the palace [[architecture]] all reinforce this directed [[concentration]], at the same time creating the [[illusion]] of a [[rational]], three dimensional [[space]].
 +
 +
The {{Wiki|distinctions}} between the [[spiritual realm]] and the {{Wiki|temporal}} [[world]] are vividly shown, for the [[pure land]] is flat and adorned, whereas the [[human world]], uneven and unadorned, is full of dangers and temptations. In this early attempt in the {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[interpretation]] of [[pure land]] [[cosmology]], it is apparent that the Han {{Wiki|perspective}} convention has undergone a {{Wiki|revolutionary}} change. {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} have [[constructed]] a new {{Wiki|perspective}} by rotating the parallel orthogonals on a vertical, central axis.
 +
 +
Focusing on the [[Buddha]] as the icon, this convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} effectively portrays deep recessional [[space]] and an orderly [[world]] associated with [[spiritual]] [[purity]]. This [[breakthrough]] in {{Wiki|perspective}} construction in the sixth century can be attributed to the influence of the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode of [[representation]] that follows the {{Wiki|principles}} of frontality, centrality, and {{Wiki|symmetry}}, abundantly shown in [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]]. When the {{Wiki|principles}} of {{Wiki|symmetry}} and [[balance]] were applied to the [[traditional]] Han parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}}, the result was two sets of orthogonals, symmetrically placed and angled, meeting on the central axis where the main icons are presented frontally.
  
This portrayal of the sahã [[world]] follows the {{Wiki|naturalistic}} [[tradition]] of Han [[art]] in [[Sichuan]]. Depicted from a bird's-eye point of view, the [[mountains]] and valleys are shown on a tilted ground plane. Their silhouettes overlap and are then internally modeled, creating a succession of planes that give the [[illusion]] of spatial depth. However, instead of the Han {{Wiki|perspective}} of parallel orthogonals projecting in one [[direction]], the [[mountains]] with winding [[paths]] draw one's gaze upward along the relief to focus on the [[buddha's]] assembly in the top center. This mode of {{Wiki|perspective}} construction is even more clearly shown in the [[pure land]] scene above. Instead of one set of orthogonals receding into the distance in only one [[direction]], two sets of {{Wiki|orthogonal}} lines proceed symmetrically from the sides, converging on the central axis at several points. The [[intention]] is to focus the viewer's [[eye]] and [[attention]] on the central icon of Amitãbha [[Buddha]] presiding over the [[Western Pure Land]]. The [[bridges]], the rows of [[trees]], the [[listeners]], and the palace [[architecture]] all reinforce this directed [[concentration]], at the same time creating the [[illusion]] of a [[rational]], threedimensional [[space]].
 
The {{Wiki|distinctions}} between the [[spiritual realm]] and the {{Wiki|temporal}} [[world]] are vividly shown, for the [[pure land]] is flat and adorned, whereas the [[human world]], uneven and unadorned, is full of dangers and temptations. In this early attempt in the {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[interpretation]] of [[pure land]] [[cosmology]], it is apparent that the Han {{Wiki|perspective}} convention has undergone a {{Wiki|revolutionary}} change. {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|artists}} have [[constructed]] a new {{Wiki|perspective}} by rotating the parallel orthogonals on a vertical, central axis. Focusing on the [[Buddha]] as the icon, this convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} effectively portrays deep recessional [[space]] and an orderly [[world]] associated with [[spiritual]] [[purity]]. This [[breakthrough]] in {{Wiki|perspective}} construction in the sixth century can be attributed to the influence of the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode of [[representation]] that follows the {{Wiki|principles}} of frontality, centrality, and {{Wiki|symmetry}}, abundantly shown in [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]]. When the {{Wiki|principles}} of {{Wiki|symmetry}} and [[balance]] were applied to the [[traditional]] Han parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}}, the result was two sets of orthogonals, symmetrically placed and angled, meeting on the central axis where the main icons are presented frontally.
 
 
By the seventh and eighth centuries, the panorama of grand [[pure land]] [[imagery]] had matured, and hundreds of these paintings have survived at [[Dunhuang]] (see fig. 3.5). Because of the increasing empha
 
By the seventh and eighth centuries, the panorama of grand [[pure land]] [[imagery]] had matured, and hundreds of these paintings have survived at [[Dunhuang]] (see fig. 3.5). Because of the increasing empha
  
sis on devotional [[faith]] to [[deities]], the murals usually only show the splendor of the [[pure land]], without depicting the less-than-perfect [[conditions]] of the [[human world]]. In these eighth-century murals, the [[pure land]] is portrayed from a very high viewpoint, forcing the ground plane to tilt sharply upward. Descriptive details of the wonders of the [[pure land]] are extravagantly captured in vivid [[imagery]], further enhanced with the magnificent Chinese-style palatial [[architecture]] and a mature, [[sensuous]] figural style. The convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} is more developed and grandiose, and experimented with in a variety of ways. In some compositions, the orthogonals at the sides direct the viewer's gaze away from rather than toward the center, resulting in the zigzag or so-called herringbone {{Wiki|perspective}}. Emphasizing the salvific [[powers]] of the [[Buddha]] and [[bodhisattvas]], the icons are presented as larger-than-life figures. Since [[pure land]] Images were associated with the [[practice of meditation]] and [[visualization]], the converging orthogonals enhance this [[ritual practice]] by directing the viewer's gaze to the central icon. The virtual [[space]] created in these images is so compelling and enticing that it draws the viewer and worshipper into this [[visionary]] [[world]], assisting him/her in the [[realization]] of [[religious]] goals.
+
sis on devotional [[faith]] to [[deities]], the murals usually only show the splendor of the [[pure land]], without depicting the less-than-perfect [[conditions]] of the [[human world]]. In these eighth-century murals, the [[pure land]] is portrayed from a very high viewpoint, forcing the ground plane to tilt sharply upward. Descriptive details of the wonders of the [[pure land]] are extravagantly captured in vivid [[imagery]], further enhanced with the magnificent Chinese-style palatial [[architecture]] and a mature, [[sensuous]] figural style.  
 +
 
 +
The convergent multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} is more developed and grandiose, and experimented with in a variety of ways. In some compositions, the orthogonals at the sides direct the viewer's gaze away from rather than toward the center, resulting in the zigzag or so-called herringbone {{Wiki|perspective}}.  
 +
 
 +
Emphasizing the salvific [[powers]] of the [[Buddha]] and [[bodhisattvas]], the icons are presented as larger-than-life figures. Since [[pure land]] Images were associated with the [[practice of meditation]] and [[visualization]], the converging orthogonals enhance this [[ritual practice]] by directing the viewer's gaze to the central icon. The virtual [[space]] created in these images is so compelling and enticing that it draws the viewer and worshipper into this [[visionary]] [[world]], assisting him/her in the [[realization]] of [[religious]] goals.
 +
 
 +
While the convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} matured in the seventh and eighth centuries, the [[traditional]] parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} also developed into a more sophisticated rendering of pictorial [[space]] in the depiction of landscapes. Employing [[visual]] cues such as overlapping silhouettes of [[mountains]], zigzagging shorelines, [[objects]] diminishing in size as they recede into the distance, and [[humans]] in appropriate proportion to [[nature]], landscapes in this mode of [[representation]] were reserved for the many scenes of [[Wikipedia:narrative|narratives]] which take place in the sahã [[world]]. They are usually placed as {{Wiki|narrative}} vignettes along the sides or the bottom of the pictorial composition, such as the sixteen stages of [[Queen]] [[Vaidehi's]] [[meditation]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.8).
  
While the convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} matured in the seventh and eighth centuries, the [[traditional]] parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} also developed into a more sophisticated rendering of pictorial [[space]] in the depiction of landscapes. Employing [[visual]] cues such as overlapping silhouettes of [[mountains]], zigzagging shorelines, [[objects]] diminishing in size as they recede into the distance, and [[humans]] in appropriate proportion to [[nature]], landscapes in this mode of [[representation]] were reserved for the many scenes of [[Wikipedia:narrative|narratives]] which take place in the sahã [[world]]. They are usually placed as {{Wiki|narrative}} vignettes along the sides or the bottom of the pictorial composition, such as the sixteen stages of [[Queen]] Videhi's [[meditation]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.8).
 
 
Between the sahã [[world]] and the [[pure lands]] are the [[sacred]] [[abodes]] of the [[great bodhisattvas]] such as Avalokiteévara, Mañjuérï, and [[Samantabhadra]]. The [[bodhisattva]] [[doctrine]] is a key [[tenet]] of [[Mahãyãna]] teachings, and the [[art]] of [[Dunhuang]] also documents the [[rising]] {{Wiki|cult}} of [[bodhisattvas]]. Advanced [[bodhisattvas]] are portrayed as {{Wiki|cult}} [[deities]] in their [[own]] right, presiding over the [[abodes]] where they exert their
 
Between the sahã [[world]] and the [[pure lands]] are the [[sacred]] [[abodes]] of the [[great bodhisattvas]] such as Avalokiteévara, Mañjuérï, and [[Samantabhadra]]. The [[bodhisattva]] [[doctrine]] is a key [[tenet]] of [[Mahãyãna]] teachings, and the [[art]] of [[Dunhuang]] also documents the [[rising]] {{Wiki|cult}} of [[bodhisattvas]]. Advanced [[bodhisattvas]] are portrayed as {{Wiki|cult}} [[deities]] in their [[own]] right, presiding over the [[abodes]] where they exert their
 
   
 
   
[[spiritual]] influence. Some important examples include the figure of Avalokiteévara as savior who heeds the calls of [[suffering]] [[beings]], looming large over a {{Wiki|naturalistic}} landscape (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.9). Another example is the [[sacred]] map of [[Mount Wutai]] presided over by Mañjušrï in {{Wiki|Cave}} 61, although in this case a sculptural icon of the [[bodhisattva]] stands in front of the panorama    [[Bodhisattvas]] remain engaged in the [[world]], and thus their [[abodes]] are still located in the sahã [[world]]. But because their intermediary [[abodes]] are the [[sacred]] spaces where transformative [[actions]] occur, {{Wiki|artists}} adopted the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode of a convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} rather than the parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} to depict them. Unlike the flat land, [[lotus]] ponds, and palatial [[architecture]] of [[pure lands]], however, the topography of [[bodhisattvas]]' [[abodes]] is mountainous. Though naturalistically portrayed, the [[mountains]] are also shown in the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode thus presenting a semi-real, {{Wiki|conceptual}} landscape.
+
[[spiritual]] influence. Some important examples include the figure of [[Avalokiteshvara]] as savior who heeds the calls of [[suffering]] [[beings]], looming large over a {{Wiki|naturalistic}} landscape (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.9). Another example is the [[sacred]] map of [[Mount Wutai]] presided over by Mañjušrï in {{Wiki|Cave}} 61, although in this case a sculptural icon of the [[bodhisattva]] stands in front of the panorama    [[Bodhisattvas]] remain engaged in the [[world]], and thus their [[abodes]] are still located in the [[sahã world]].  
 +
 
 +
But because their intermediary [[abodes]] are the [[sacred]] spaces where transformative [[actions]] occur, {{Wiki|artists}} adopted the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode of a convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} rather than the parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} to depict them. Unlike the flat land, [[lotus]] ponds, and palatial [[architecture]] of [[pure lands]], however, the topography of [[bodhisattvas]]' [[abodes]] is mountainous. Though naturalistically portrayed, the [[mountains]] are also shown in the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode thus presenting a semi-real, {{Wiki|conceptual}} landscape.
 +
 
 +
The invention of the convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} in the depiction of [[pure lands]] and [[bodhisattvas]]' [[sacred mountains]] was brought about by the {{Wiki|synthesis}} of native and foreign [[traditions]], namely, the {{Wiki|Han Chinese}} parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} and the [[Indian Buddhist]] {{Wiki|principles}} of {{Wiki|iconic}} composition.
 +
 
 +
This new {{Wiki|perspective}} resembles but is not fundamentally comparable to the linear {{Wiki|perspective}} with a single vanishing point discovered in {{Wiki|Renaissance}} {{Wiki|Italy}}, which is based on a [[scientific]] [[understanding]] of the optics of a [[visual]] pyramid. The [[illusory]] [[space]] described in [[pure land]] images is only {{Wiki|conceptual}} and not based on [[science]], but it is nonetheless a means of [[symbolizing]] the order and [[serenity]] of a supernal [[world]].
 +
 
 +
In 1927, the renowned [[art]] historian Erwin Panofsky published his seminal PersPective as [[Symbolic]] Fonn, in which he applied to the study of [[visual]] [[arts]] the {{Wiki|theory}} of [[symbolic]] [[forms]] advanced by Ernst [[Cassirer]], the [[philosopher]] and [[intellectual]] historian who a couple of decades earlier had published The [[Philosophy of Symbolic Forms]]. 27 To [[Cassirer]], "[[symbolic forms]]" are the products of [[humans]]' unique [[symbolizing]] [[activity]] in different [[spheres]] of {{Wiki|creativity}}, from [[art]] to [[myth]], [[religion]], [[language]], and [[science]]. Panofsky argues that, from classic antiquity to the {{Wiki|Renaissance}}, {{Wiki|perspective}} construction is one of those
  
The invention of the convergent {{Wiki|perspective}} in the depiction of [[pure lands]] and [[bodhisattvas]]' [[sacred mountains]] was brought about by the {{Wiki|synthesis}} of native and foreign [[traditions]], namely, the {{Wiki|Han Chinese}} parallel {{Wiki|orthogonal}} {{Wiki|perspective}} and the [[Indian Buddhist]] {{Wiki|principles}} of {{Wiki|iconic}} composition. This new {{Wiki|perspective}} resembles but is not fundamentally comparable to the linear {{Wiki|perspective}} with a single vanishing point discovered in {{Wiki|Renaissance}} {{Wiki|Italy}}, which is based on a [[scientific]] [[understanding]] of the optics of a [[visual]] pyramid. The [[illusory]] [[space]] described in [[pure land]] images is only {{Wiki|conceptual}} and not based on [[science]], but it is nonetheless a means of [[symbolizing]] the order and [[serenity]] of a supernal [[world]].
+
"[[symbolic forms]]" in which "[[spiritual]] meaning is [[attached]] to a concrete, material sign and intrinsically given to this sign. "28 By this he means that the construction of a pictorial [[space]] is linked to the perspectival worldview—in other words, that the systematic ordering of [[visual phenomena]] is the outward expression of a specific {{Wiki|conception}} of the [[world]] (namely, the [[objectification]] of the [[subjective]]). In classical antiquity, Vitruvius defines skenograPhia (the {{Wiki|perspective}} [[representation]] of a three-dimensional {{Wiki|structure}} on a surface) using the {{Wiki|compass}} point as a center of projection for the [[eye]] of the beholder.  
  
In 1927, the renowned [[art]] historian Erwin Panofsky published his seminal PersPective as [[Symbolic]] Fonn, in which he applied to the study of [[visual]] [[arts]] the {{Wiki|theory}} of [[symbolic]] [[forms]] advanced by Ernst [[Cassirer]], the [[philosopher]] and [[intellectual]] historian who a couple of decades earlier had published The [[Philosophy]] of [[Symbolic]] [[Forms]]. 27 To [[Cassirer]], "[[symbolic]] [[forms]]" are the products of [[humans]]' unique [[symbolizing]] [[activity]] in different [[spheres]] of {{Wiki|creativity}}, from [[art]] to [[myth]], [[religion]], [[language]], and [[science]]. Panofsky argues that, from classic antiquity to the {{Wiki|Renaissance}}, {{Wiki|perspective}} construction is one of those
+
In this scheme, the extension of the orthogonals does not merge as a single point but converges and meets in pairs at several points along a common axis. 29 In the {{Wiki|Renaissance}}, the invention of the single vanishing point {{Wiki|perspective}} derived from the [[scientific]] [[understanding]] of the [[visual]] pyramid. 30 Resting on a [[rational]] [[experience]] of [[empirical]] [[visual]] [[space]], it creates a systematic, [[scientific]] {{Wiki|perspective}} through which we can [[experience]] the "[[infinite]]" experiential [[world]].  
  
"[[symbolic]] [[forms]]" in which "[[spiritual]] meaning is [[attached]] to a concrete, material sign and intrinsically given to this sign. "28 By this he means that the construction of a pictorial [[space]] is linked to the perspectival worldview—in other words, that the systematic ordering of [[visual]] [[phenomena]] is the outward expression of a specific {{Wiki|conception}} of the [[world]] (namely, the [[objectification]] of the [[subjective]]). In classical antiquity, Vitruvius defines skenograPhia (the {{Wiki|perspective}} [[representation]] of a three-dimensional {{Wiki|structure}} on a surface) using the {{Wiki|compass}} point as a center of projection for the [[eye]] of the beholder. In this scheme, the extension of the orthogonals does not merge as a single point but converges and meets in pairs at several points along a common axis. 29 In the {{Wiki|Renaissance}}, the invention of the single vanishing point {{Wiki|perspective}} derived from the [[scientific]] [[understanding]] of the [[visual]] pyramid. 30 Resting on a [[rational]] [[experience]] of [[empirical]] [[visual]] [[space]], it creates a systematic, [[scientific]] {{Wiki|perspective}} through which we can [[experience]] the "[[infinite]]" experiential [[world]]. To Panofsky, the {{Wiki|Renaissance}} {{Wiki|perspective}} construction represents the translation of a psychophysiological [[space]] into {{Wiki|mathematical}} [[space]]. It is no more and no less a [[symbolic]] [[form]] than the skenograPhia of classical antiquity was of the {{Wiki|Greco-Roman}} perspectival worldview. In a similar vein, we can consider the multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} of [[pure land]] [[imagery]] a [[symbolic]] [[form]], in that it translates and transforms the psychophysiological or [[Buddhist]] [[metaphysical]] [[space]] (the [[sacred]] [[space]] of the [[pure land]] [[cosmology]]) into a semi-rational, orderly virtual [[space]].
+
To Panofsky, the {{Wiki|Renaissance}} {{Wiki|perspective}} construction represents the translation of a psychophysiological [[space]] into {{Wiki|mathematical}} [[space]]. It is no more and no less a [[symbolic]] [[form]] than the skenograPhia of classical antiquity was of the {{Wiki|Greco-Roman}} perspectival worldview. In a similar vein, we can consider the multiple-point {{Wiki|perspective}} of [[pure land imagery]] a [[symbolic form]], in that it translates and transforms the psychophysiological or [[Buddhist metaphysical space]] (the [[sacred space of the pure land cosmology]]) into a semi-rational, orderly virtual [[space]].
  
This {{Wiki|distinctive}} {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[pure land]] {{Wiki|perspective}} was so compelling that it became the predominant mode for representing [[pure lands]], not just the Sukhãvatï of Amitäbha/Amitâyus. In turn, these [[pure land]] paintings were transmitted to [[Korea]] and [[Japan]], where some of the surviving examples illustrate the grandeur of such [[visionary]] paintingsThis [[achievement]] of a {{Wiki|naturalistic}} mode of spatial [[representation]] was perhaps fortuitous, in that it derived from a {{Wiki|synthesis}} of the native {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|perspective}} and the compositional {{Wiki|principles}} of [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]]. Nevertheless, the [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|soteriology}} that unfolds in [[cosmic]] [[space]] predisposed the {{Wiki|artists}} to seek solutions in conventions pertaining to spatial [[representation]]. In contrast, the cyclical or vertical mappmg of the single-world [[Buddhist cosmology]] (see fig. 3.1) pertains to the [[inherent]] {{Wiki|emphasis}} on [[cosmic]] time in the [[Theravada]] [[Buddhist cosmology]].
+
This {{Wiki|distinctive}} {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[pure land]] {{Wiki|perspective}} was so compelling that it became the predominant mode for representing [[pure lands]], not just the [[Sukhãvatï]] of [[Amitäbha]]/[[Amitâyus]]. In turn, these [[pure land paintings]] were transmitted to [[Korea]] and [[Japan]], where some of the surviving examples illustrate the grandeur of such [[visionary paintings]].   
  
After the tenth century, however, there was a tendency to portray the great bodhisavattvas in a less {{Wiki|iconic}} pose, such as the popular [[Water]] [[Moon]] Guanyin—a special iconographic portrayal of Avalokiteévara—seated in a pose of {{Wiki|royal}} ease on a rock formation that [[symbolizes]] his abode, [[Potalaka]], with the [[moon]] reflected in the waters before him. Depictions of the [[abodes]] of [[bodhisattvas]] also adopted a less formal, {{Wiki|naturalistic}} mode due to the increasing influence of landscape paintings developed in [[China]], such as depictions of the [[Water Moon Guanyin]], Mañjuérï, and [[Samantabhadra]] in the [[Yulin]] and
+
This [[achievement]] of a {{Wiki|naturalistic}} mode of spatial [[representation]] was perhaps fortuitous, in that it derived from a {{Wiki|synthesis}} of the native {{Wiki|Chinese}} {{Wiki|perspective}} and the compositional {{Wiki|principles}} of [[Buddhist]] [[imagery]]. Nevertheless, the [[Mahayana]] {{Wiki|soteriology}} that unfolds in [[cosmic space]] predisposed the {{Wiki|artists}} to seek solutions in conventions pertaining to spatial [[representation]]. In contrast, the cyclical or vertical mapping of the single-world [[Buddhist cosmology]] (see fig. 3.1) pertains to the [[inherent]] {{Wiki|emphasis}} on [[cosmic]] time in the [[Theravada]] [[Buddhist cosmology]].
[[East]] Thousand [[Buddhas]] cave-chapels.
 
  
 +
After the tenth century, however, there was a tendency to portray the [[great bodhisattvas]] in a less {{Wiki|iconic}} pose, such as the popular [[Water]] [[Moon]] Guanyin—a special iconographic portrayal of [[Avalokiteshvara]]—seated in a pose of {{Wiki|royal}} ease on a rock formation that [[symbolizes]] his abode, [[Potalaka]], with the [[moon]] reflected in the waters before him. Depictions of the [[abodes]] of [[bodhisattvas]] also adopted a less formal, {{Wiki|naturalistic}} mode due to the increasing influence of landscape paintings developed in [[China]], such as depictions of the [[Water Moon Guanyin]], Mañjuérï, and [[Samantabhadra]] in the [[Yulin]] and [[East]] Thousand [[Buddhas]] cave-chapels. 
  
The [[Lotus]] RePositoy [[World]]
 
  
 +
===The [[Lotus RePositoy World]]===
  
Finally, I want to examine the [[transcendent]] [[world]] described in the [[Flower Ornament]] ScriPture ([[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]], or Huayanying in {{Wiki|Chinese}}), one of the most developed Mahäyäna texts.  This [[world]] is the [[buddha-field]] of [[Vairocana Buddha]], the [[transcendent]] and [[cosmic]] aspect of Säkyamuni. As discussed earlier, the [[representation]] of the [[cosmic]] or [[transcendent buddha]] [[Vairocana]] as interchangeable with the [[universe]] is already associated with the early [[transmission]] of this text from {{Wiki|Central Asia}} to [[China]]. It is, however, the portrayal of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]] that concerns us in this section. {{Wiki|Distinct}} from [[pure lands]], [[Vairocana's]] [[buddha-field]] is known as the [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]], described with the {{Wiki|metaphor}} of a giant [[lotus]]. Technically [[Vairocana's]] [[world]] is still the sahã [[world]], but it embraces all [[worlds]] 71
 
  
fragrant ocean
+
Finally, I want to examine the [[transcendent]] [[world]] described in the [[Flower Ornament]] ScriPture ([[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]], or Huayanying in {{Wiki|Chinese}}), one of the most developed Mahäyäna texts.  This [[world]] is the [[buddhafield]] of [[Vairocana Buddha]], the [[transcendent]] and [[cosmic]] aspect of Säkyamuni. As discussed earlier, the [[representation]] of the [[cosmic]] or [[transcendent buddha]] [[Vairocana]] as interchangeable with the [[universe]] is already associated with the early [[transmission]] of this text from {{Wiki|Central Asia}} to [[China]]. It is, however, the portrayal of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]] that concerns us in this section. {{Wiki|Distinct}} from [[pure lands]], [[Vairocana's]] [[buddhafield]] is known as the [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]], described with the {{Wiki|metaphor}} of a giant [[lotus]]. Technically [[Vairocana's]] [[world]] is still the sahã [[world]], but it embraces all [[worlds]] 71
Great Encircling
 
[[Mountains]]
 
Great [[lotus flower]]
 
"[[Banner]] of {{Wiki|Fragrance}} Whose Stamens Emit [[river]] into a fragrant ocean Various Illumination"Kinds of
 
Repository of
 
Unexcelled Radiance
 
to Vari
 
81 sal HOI€
 
dianceo aching dornm
 
Flameelled
 
Fig. 3. I Oa. Diagram of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]] based on the 1997: [[Avatamsaka]] fig. 25.Sütra.
 
A. Sadakata, [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Philosophy]] and Origins. [[Tokyo]]  
 
  
  
[[Vairocana Buddha]]
+
===[[Vairocana Buddha]]===
 +
 
  
 
one thousand petals (one thousand Šäkyamunis)
 
one thousand petals (one thousand Šäkyamunis)
 
Šäkyamunis ten billion [[worlds]] in each petal
 
Šäkyamunis ten billion [[worlds]] in each petal
 +
</poem>
  
Fig. 3.10b. Diagram of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]] based on the Brahmajãla [[Sütra]]. A. Sadakata, [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Philosophy]] and Origins. [[Tokyo]] 1997: fig. 29.
+
[[Tokyo]] 1997: fig. 29.
[[including]] the triple-world system, the largest {{Wiki|conception}} of [[space]] in pre-Mahayana [[Buddhism]]. As the abstract, [[cosmic]] [[form]] of Sãkyamuni, [[Vairocana]] is [[omniscient]] and {{Wiki|omnipresent}}, and the [[sutra]] emphasizes his multiplicity and all-pervading presence. His [[world]] is one of {{Wiki|ineffable}} immensity and wonders, embracing countless numbers of [[world]] systems.
+
[[including]] the triple-world system, the largest {{Wiki|conception}} of [[space]] in pre-[[Mahayana Buddhism]]. As the abstract, [[cosmic]] [[form]] of [[Sãkyamuni]], [[Vairocana]] is [[omniscient]] and {{Wiki|omnipresent}}, and the [[sutra]] emphasizes his multiplicity and all-pervading presence. His [[world]] is one of {{Wiki|ineffable}} immensity and wonders, embracing countless numbers of [[world]] systems.
  
 
Based on the [[ancient]] [[cosmology]], the [[universe]] with [[Mount Meru]] at its center contains layers upon layers of [[wind]] circles (fig. 3. I Oa—b 73
 
Based on the [[ancient]] [[cosmology]], the [[universe]] with [[Mount Meru]] at its center contains layers upon layers of [[wind]] circles (fig. 3. I Oa—b 73
Above these [[wind]] circles is a fragrant ocean, in which blooms a giant [[lotus flower]]. The [[flower ornament]] [[world]] is a [[world]] [[purified]] (and thus ornamented) by [[Vairocana]]. It represents a [[visionary]] [[cosmology]] that glorifies the [[cosmic]] aspect of the [[historical Buddha]]  Two descriptions of this [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] [[exist]]. In one version, based on the Brahmajãla [[Sütra]] (ca. third century CE), [[Vairocana]] sits upon this [[thousand-petaled lotus]], each petal of which supports a [[world]]. The [[Buddha]] [[incarnates]] into a thousand Säkyamuni [[buddhas]], one for each of the [[worlds]]. On each petal, in each [[world]], there are ten billion [[Mount Meru]] [[worlds]]. The [[Sakyamuni]] [[buddhas]] each [[incarnate]] into ten billion Sãkyamuni [[bodhisattvas]], who dwell within each of these [[Mount Meru]] [[worlds]]. Thus there are altogether one [[Vairocana Buddha]], one thousand Sãkyamuni [[buddhas]], and ten trillion Säkyamuni [[bodhisattvas]].  
+
Above these [[wind]] circles is a fragrant ocean, in which blooms a giant [[lotus flower]]. The [[flower ornament]] [[world]] is a [[world]] [[purified]] (and thus ornamented) by [[Vairocana]].  
 +
 
 +
It represents a [[visionary]] [[cosmology]] that glorifies the [[cosmic]] aspect of the [[historical Buddha]]  Two descriptions of this [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] [[exist]]. In one version, based on the Brahmajãla [[Sütra]] (ca. third century CE), [[Vairocana]] sits upon this [[thousand-petaled lotus]], each petal of which supports a [[world]].  
 +
 
 +
The [[Buddha]] [[incarnates]] into a thousand Säkyamuni [[buddhas]], one for each of the [[worlds]]. On each petal, in each [[world]], there are ten billion [[Mount Meru]] [[worlds]]. The [[Sakyamuni]] [[buddhas]] each [[incarnate]] into ten billion [[Sãkyamuni]] [[bodhisattvas]], who dwell within each of these [[Mount Meru]] [[worlds]]. Thus there are altogether one [[Vairocana Buddha]], one thousand Sãkyamuni [[buddhas]], and ten trillion Säkyamuni [[bodhisattvas]].  
  
 
The [[sutra]] also speaks of each {{Wiki|atom}} of the [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] as containing the [[universe]] of [[elemental]] [[cosmos]], countless as the sands of the [[Ganges]].  With such spatial {{Wiki|metaphors}} for multiplicity and expansion, the [[cosmos]] is described in tandem with images of the [[Buddha's]] all-pervading [[nature]]. [[Flowers]] refer to [[meditative practice]] and [[good deeds]], which produce [[spiritual]] {{Wiki|fruits}} and [[seeds]]. The ocean of fragrant [[water]] [[symbolizes]] the "[[repository consciousness]]," a [[storehouse]] for experiential [[impressions]].
 
The [[sutra]] also speaks of each {{Wiki|atom}} of the [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] as containing the [[universe]] of [[elemental]] [[cosmos]], countless as the sands of the [[Ganges]].  With such spatial {{Wiki|metaphors}} for multiplicity and expansion, the [[cosmos]] is described in tandem with images of the [[Buddha's]] all-pervading [[nature]]. [[Flowers]] refer to [[meditative practice]] and [[good deeds]], which produce [[spiritual]] {{Wiki|fruits}} and [[seeds]]. The ocean of fragrant [[water]] [[symbolizes]] the "[[repository consciousness]]," a [[storehouse]] for experiential [[impressions]].
  
A vivid [[representation]] of [[Vairocana Buddha]] and his [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] is the colossal statue in the Tõdaiji ([[Great Eastern Temple]]) in Nara, [[Japan]]. Dating to the mid-eighth century, [[Vairocana Buddha]] sits atop a giant [[lotus]]. Although the [[buddha]] statue itself was destroyed and recast in the seventeenth century, the [[lotus]] pedestal is of original eighth-century date. On the petals are engravings that depict a simplified version of the [[Mount Meru]] [[world]], with layers of [[wind]] circles and numerous [[buddhas]] representing [[Vairocana's]] [[incarnations]] in [[innumerable worlds]].  
+
A vivid [[representation]] of [[Vairocana Buddha]] and his [[Lotus]] Repository [[World]] is the colossal statue in the [[Tõdaiji]] ([[Great Eastern Temple]]) in [[Nara]], [[Japan]]. Dating to the mid-eighth century, [[Vairocana Buddha]] sits atop a giant [[lotus]]. Although the [[buddha]] statue itself was destroyed and recast in the seventeenth century, the [[lotus]] pedestal is of original eighth-century date. On the petals are engravings that depict a simplified version of the [[Mount Meru]] [[world]], with layers of [[wind]] circles and numerous [[buddhas]] representing [[Vairocana's]] [[incarnations]] in [[innumerable worlds]].  
  
There are some thirty examples of murals and {{Wiki|silk}} paintings at [[Dunhuang]] of the so-called [[Huayan]] [[bian]], or "[[transformation]] tableaux," that embody or make [[manifest]] the entirety of the teachings of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]]. 38 A tenth-century {{Wiki|silk}} painting depicts the [[Buddha's]]
+
There are some thirty examples of murals and {{Wiki|silk}} paintings at [[Dunhuang]] of the so-called [[Huayan bian]], or "[[transformation]] tableaux," that embody or make [[manifest]] the entirety of the teachings of the [[Avatamsaka Sütra]]. 38 A tenth-century {{Wiki|silk}} painting depicts the [[Buddha's]]
  
[[magical]] [[appearances]] in seven [[mythical]] locations where he expounded the [[Huayan]] teachings in nine gatherings (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3. I l)  The [[Lotus]] Repository YVorld (in this case based on the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]] rather than the Brahmajãla [[Sütra]]) is depicted in the bottom part of the painting, separated from the assemblies by an arc of five-colored clouds. A large [[lotus]] emerges from the oceans of fragrant [[water]], supported by two [[serpent]] [[kings]] (nãgas). The walled enclosures depicted within the [[lotus]] refer to the [[infinity]] of [[world]] systems it contains, with jeweled lights displaying an array of countless [[buddhas]]. In [[scriptural]] descriptions, this ocean of [[worlds]] is square and level, and the land within is also clean and level, set with [[boundaries]] made of [[diamonds]], [[gems]], and other [[precious]] materials. The image of this {{Wiki|luminous}} [[world]] is likened to the [[jeweled net]] of [[Indra]], the [[god of gods]] (and the [[ancient]] {{Wiki|Vedic}} storm and [[warrior]] [[god]]); in his palace [[Indra]] hangs a net adorned with {{Wiki|innumerable}} {{Wiki|pearls}}. The lights of the {{Wiki|pearls}} reflect upon one another, and the {{Wiki|pearls}} in turn {{Wiki|reflecting}} their mutual reflections. This intricate image of reflective {{Wiki|light}} alludes to the [[interdependent]] [[nature]] of [[existence]]. [[Cosmic]] [[Vairocana]], the progenitor of {{Wiki|innumerable}} [[buddhas]] in [[innumerable worlds]], is one and all; he is the [[universe]] itself.
+
[[magical]] [[appearances]] in seven [[mythical]] locations where he expounded the [[Huayan]] teachings in nine gatherings (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3. I l)  The [[Lotus]] Repository YVorld (in this case based on the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]] rather than the [[Brahmajãla Sütra]]) is depicted in the bottom part of the painting, separated from the assemblies by an arc of five-colored clouds. A large [[lotus]] emerges from the oceans of fragrant [[water]], supported by two [[serpent]] [[kings]] ([[nãgas]]).  
 +
 
 +
The walled enclosures depicted within the [[lotus]] refer to the [[infinity]] of [[world]] systems it contains, with jeweled lights displaying an array of countless [[buddhas]]. In [[scriptural]] descriptions, this ocean of [[worlds]] is square and level, and the land within is also clean and level, set with [[boundaries]] made of [[diamonds]], [[gems]], and other [[precious]] materials.  
 +
 
 +
The image of this {{Wiki|luminous}} [[world]] is likened to the [[jeweled net]] of [[Indra]], the [[god of gods]] (and the [[ancient]] {{Wiki|Vedic}} storm and [[warrior]] [[god]]); in his palace [[Indra]] hangs a net adorned with {{Wiki|innumerable}} {{Wiki|pearls}}. The lights of the {{Wiki|pearls}} reflect upon one another, and the {{Wiki|pearls}} in turn {{Wiki|reflecting}} their mutual reflections. This intricate image of reflective {{Wiki|light}} alludes to the [[interdependent]] [[nature]] of [[existence]]. [[Cosmic]] [[Vairocana]], the progenitor of {{Wiki|innumerable}} [[buddhas]] in [[innumerable worlds]], is one and all; he is the [[universe]] itself.
  
 
Although these [[Huayan]] paintings include the depiction of a giant [[lotus]], the main [[subjects]] portrayed in the Seven Locations and Nine Assemblies are (from left in {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.11):
 
Although these [[Huayan]] paintings include the depiction of a giant [[lotus]], the main [[subjects]] portrayed in the Seven Locations and Nine Assemblies are (from left in {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.11):
  
Top register:
+
 
 +
===Top register:===
 +
<poem>
  
 
5th assembly ([[Tusita Heaven]])
 
5th assembly ([[Tusita Heaven]])
Line 182: Line 273:
 
1st assembly ([[Bodhigaya]])
 
1st assembly ([[Bodhigaya]])
 
9th assembly ([[Jetavana]] Groves)
 
9th assembly ([[Jetavana]] Groves)
 +
</poem>
  
 +
The [[seven mystical locations]] all occur within the [[realm of desire]] ([[kãmadhatu]]), the lowest [[sphere]] in the triple-world system in [[Buddhist cosmology]]. The [[realm of desire]] is further divided into [[heavens]], [[earth]] (Jambudvïpa), and [[hells]]. In the [[Huayan]] scheme, the [[Buddha]] preaches the first assembly at [[Bodhigaya]], where he achieved [[enlightenment]], in the bottom center. The subsequent assemblies take place in the [[heavenly]] [[abodes]] of [[gods]] ([[including]] the second, seventh, and eighth assemblies). The most significant one, the third assembly, shown in the center, occurs at [[Trayastriméa]], [[Indra's]] abode.
  
The seven [[mystical]] locations all occur within the [[realm of desire]] (kãmadhatu), the lowest [[sphere]] in the triple-world system in [[Buddhist cosmology]]. The [[realm of desire]] is further divided into [[heavens]], [[earth]] (Jambudvïpa), and [[hells]]. In the [[Huayan]] scheme, the [[Buddha]] preaches the first assembly at [[Bodhigaya]], where he achieved [[enlightenment]], in the bottom center. The subsequent assemblies take place in the [[heavenly]] [[abodes]] of [[gods]] ([[including]] the second, seventh, and eighth assemblies). The most significant one, the third assembly, shown in the center, occurs at Trayastriméa, [[Indra's]] abode. The fourth, fifth and sixth assemblies take place in the upper levels of [[heaven]] and are shown in the upper register, culminating in the [[sixth heaven]] of Vaéavartin. The last or ninth assembly, during which the Gaudayüha (the last [[chapter]] of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]]) was [[taught]], occurs at the [[Jetavana]] Groves in Jambudvïpa, the site of the [[Buddha's]] [[first sermon]]. It is shown to the right of the first assembly, thus concluding the sequence of [[mystical]] [[visions]] in a kind of circular [[path]].
+
The fourth, fifth and sixth assemblies take place in the upper levels of [[heaven]] and are shown in the upper register, culminating in the [[sixth heaven]] of Vaéavartin. The last or ninth assembly, during which the [[Gaudayüha]] (the last [[chapter]] of the [[Avatamsaka Sütra]]) was [[taught]], occurs at the [[Jetavana]] Groves in [[Jambudvïpa]], the site of the [[Buddha's]] [[first sermon]]. It is shown to the right of the first assembly, thus concluding the sequence of [[mystical]] [[visions]] in a kind of circular [[path]].
  
This portable {{Wiki|silk}} painting is [[identical]] in composition to a number of wall murals at [[Dunhuang]], such as that of {{Wiki|Cave}} 61, in the spatialtemporal arrangement of the assemblies  Other [[Huayan]] murals are depicted on the sloped walls of ceilings, either with the whole composition fitted into the {{Wiki|trapezoidal}} shape or divided into three slopes, each showing three assemblies. The only {{Wiki|narrative}} [[elements]] found in [[Huayan]] paintings are derived from the [[Gandayüha]], the last [[chapter]] of this composite text that narrates the young boy [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]] to visit fifty-three [[sages]] in search of [[enlightenment]]. The {{Wiki|narrative}} vignettes at the edges of some murals show scenes of [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]], but this [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}} soon developed {{Wiki|independently}} and became very popular in [[China]] and [[Japan]] after the tenth century.
+
This portable {{Wiki|silk}} painting is [[identical]] in composition to a number of wall murals at [[Dunhuang]], such as that of {{Wiki|Cave}} 61, in the spatial {{Wiki|temporal}} arrangement of the assemblies  Other [[Huayan]] murals are depicted on the sloped walls of ceilings, either with the whole composition fitted into the {{Wiki|trapezoidal}} shape or divided into three slopes, each showing three assemblies.  
  
The assemblies are more or less [[identical]] and are static, with minimal details about place and {{Wiki|narrative}} content, unlike the deep recessional [[space]] and descriptive details shown in [[pure land]] depictions. Nevertheless, subtly interwoven into this diagrammatic composition we can interpret the [[Huayan]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] of the [[three worlds]] ([[triloka]]) and the [[three bodies]] (trikãya). For example, the locations occur both at Jambudvïpa and in the [[heavens]] of [[gods]]. While the historical
+
The only {{Wiki|narrative}} [[elements]] found in [[Huayan]] paintings are derived from the [[Gandayüha]], the last [[chapter]] of this composite text that narrates the young boy [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]] to visit fifty-three [[sages]] in search of [[enlightenment]]. The {{Wiki|narrative}} vignettes at the edges of some murals show scenes of [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]], but this [[subject]] {{Wiki|matter}} soon developed {{Wiki|independently}} and became very popular in [[China]] and [[Japan]] after the tenth century.
76
 
locations provide the settings for the [[transformation body]] (nirmãmkãya) of the [[Buddha]], the [[mystical]] places in [[heavens]] furnish the environments for the apparitions of the [[Buddha's]] [[enjoyment body]] sambhogakãya). The [[Huayan]] [[doctrine]] also describes the [[Buddha]] in [[absolute]] terms as the [[truth body]] (dharmakãya), [[embodied]] by [[Vairocana]], the supreme lord of the [[universe]]. The [[world]] of [[Vairocana]] is the dharmadhãtu, the [[realm]] of the Law, the [[absolute]], [[symbolized]] by the [[lotus]].
 
  
A second {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] painting, of about the same date as the last {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] [[bian]], illustrates the Da§abhümika [[chapter]] of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[Sütra]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.12) 42 Like the Gandavyüha, the Daýabhümika was originally an {{Wiki|independent}} text incorporated into the larger [[Avatamsaka]] {{Wiki|literature}}. It enumerates the [[ten stages]] of [[bodhisattvahood]] shown in the painting as ten [[transcendent]] assemblies arranged into four registers, from left to right, top to bottom. In the bottom register, the two extra squares show the [[great bodhisattvas]] [[Samantabhadra]] in the lower left and Mañjuérï in the lower right, flanking the assembly of [[Vairocana]] in the center. [[Vairocana]], [[Samantabhadra]], and Mañjušrï are known as the Three {{Wiki|Holy}} Ones of the [[Avatamsaka]] [[doctrine]]. The presence of the young boy [[Sudhana]] among the entourages of [[Samantabhadra]] and Mañjuérï makes reference to the Gaudavyüha, suggesting that the painting [[embodies]] the meanings of both the Da§abhümika and Gaudavyüha chapters. In [[doctrinal]] terms, the painting is an [[exposition]] of the [[path]] of [[spiritual]] advancement, from a description of the progressive [[stages of bodhisattvahood]] to [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]] and [[realization of enlightenment]] under the guidance of the two [[great bodhisattvas]].
+
The assemblies are more or less [[identical]] and are static, with minimal details about place and {{Wiki|narrative}} content, unlike the deep recessional [[space]] and descriptive details shown in [[pure land]] depictions. Nevertheless, subtly interwoven into this diagrammatic composition we can interpret the [[Huayan]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] of the [[three worlds]] ([[triloka]]) and the [[three bodies]] ([[trikãya]]). For example, the locations occur both at Jambudvïpa and in the [[heavens]] of [[gods]]. While the historical
  
The two {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] paintings are similar in their use of a grid pattern to arrange the assemblies. They also share similar iconographic details and stylistic [[characteristics]], suggesting that they were made about the same time. The {{Wiki|French}} [[scholar]] J. Giès suggests that these two liturgical paintings are related to each other dialectically. Perhaps hung on [[temple]] walls facing each other as a [[ritual]] presentation, they set up a [[visual]] {{Wiki|hierarchy}} analogous to the {{Wiki|scholastic}} [[exposition]] of both a general {{Wiki|theory}} and a scheme of practice. The delineation of the [[ten stages]] of [[bodhisattvahood]] [[essential]] to practice is shown in {{Wiki|conjunction}} with the apparition of the [[buddhas]]' assem-
+
locations provide the settings for the [[transformation body]] (nirmãmkãya) of the [[Buddha]], the [[mystical]] places in [[heavens]] furnish the environments for the apparitions of the [[Buddha's [enjoyment body]] [[sambhogakãya]]). The [[Huayan]] [[doctrine]] also describes the [[Buddha]] in [[absolute]] terms as the [[truth body]] ([[dharmakãya]]), [[embodied]] by [[Vairocana]], the supreme lord of the [[universe]]. The [[world]] of [[Vairocana]] is the [[dharmadhãtu]], the [[realm]] of the Law, the [[absolute]], [[symbolized]] by the [[lotus]].
 +
 
 +
A second {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] painting, of about the same date as the last {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] [[bian]], illustrates the [[Da§abhümika]] [[chapter]] of the [[Avatamsaka Sütra]] (see {{Wiki|color}} fig. 3.12) 42 Like the [[Gandavyüha]], the [[Daýabhümika]] was originally an {{Wiki|independent}} text incorporated into the larger [[Avatamsaka]] {{Wiki|literature}}. It enumerates the [[ten stages]] of [[bodhisattva hood]] shown in the painting as ten [[transcendent]] assemblies arranged into four registers, from left to right, top to bottom.
 +
 
 +
In the bottom register, the two extra squares show the [[great bodhisattvas]] [[Samantabhadra]] in the lower left and Mañjuérï in the lower right, flanking the assembly of [[Vairocana]] in the center. [[Vairocana]], [[Samantabhadra]], and Mañjušrï are known as the [[Three Holy Ones of the Avatamsaka doctrine]].
 +
 
 +
The presence of the young boy [[Sudhana]] among the entourages of [[Samantabhadra]] and Mañjuérï makes reference to the [[Gaudavyüha]], suggesting that the painting [[embodies]] the meanings of both the [[Dasabhümika]]] and [[Gaudavyüha]] chapters. In [[doctrinal]] terms, the painting is an [[exposition]] of the [[path]] of [[spiritual]] advancement, from a description of the progressive [[stages of bodhisattva hood]] to [[Sudhana's]] [[pilgrimage]] and [[realization of enlightenment]] under the guidance of the two [[great bodhisattvas]].
 +
 
 +
The two {{Wiki|silk}} [[Huayan]] paintings are similar in their use of a grid pattern to arrange the assemblies. They also share similar iconographic details and stylistic [[characteristics]], suggesting that they were made about the same time. The {{Wiki|French}} [[scholar]] J. Giès suggests that these two liturgical paintings are related to each other dialectically. Perhaps hung on [[temple]] walls facing each other as a [[ritual]] presentation, they set up a [[visual]] {{Wiki|hierarchy}} analogous to the {{Wiki|scholastic}} [[exposition]] of both a general {{Wiki|theory}} and a scheme of practice. The delineation of the [[ten stages]] of [[bodhisattva hood]] [[essential]] to practice is shown in {{Wiki|conjunction}} with the apparition of the [[buddhas]]' assem-
  
  
 
blies in their [[mythical]] locations, structurally arranged according to those locations' [[relative]] positions in the [[Buddhist]] [[cosmos]].
 
blies in their [[mythical]] locations, structurally arranged according to those locations' [[relative]] positions in the [[Buddhist]] [[cosmos]].
The compositional [[formula]] of arranging the [[buddhas]]' assemblies in a grid plan, the elimination of {{Wiki|narrative}} details in favor of the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode, and the diagrammatic configuration of spatial and {{Wiki|temporal}} [[elements]] foreshadow the mandala-like [[cosmic]] diagrams in [[esoteric]] [[Buddhist art]]. As many [[scholars]] have noted, the geometric [[representation]] of the [[universe]] that shows the [[Buddha's]] manifold all-embracing presence is a precursor to the [[development]] of [[esoteric Buddhism]], and the origins of the [[esoteric mandala]] are rooted in such [[symbolism]] and mode of [[thinking]] and [[imagery]]. If the cyclical [[wheel of life]], the vertical [[Buddhist]] map of the single-world system see fig. 3. l), and the virtual [[space]] of the [[pure land]] [[cosmology]] (see fig. 3.5) are germane to their respective {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial emphases, then it is understandable that this abstract, diagrammatic mode of [[representation]] was devised to address both {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial {{Wiki|dimensions}} in the complex [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]].
+
The compositional [[formula]] of arranging the [[buddhas]]' assemblies in a grid plan, the elimination of {{Wiki|narrative}} details in favor of the {{Wiki|iconic}} mode, and the diagrammatic configuration of spatial and {{Wiki|temporal}} [[elements]] foreshadow the mandala-like [[cosmic]] diagrams in [[esoteric]] [[Buddhist art]].  
 +
 
 +
As many [[scholars]] have noted, the geometric [[representation]] of the [[universe]] that shows the [[Buddha's]] manifold all-embracing presence is a precursor to the [[development]] of [[esoteric Buddhism]], and the origins of the [[esoteric mandala]] are rooted in such [[symbolism]] and mode of [[thinking]] and [[imagery]]. If the cyclical [[wheel of life]], the vertical [[Buddhist]] map of the single-world system see fig. 3. l), and the virtual [[space]] of the [[pure land]] [[cosmology]] (see fig. 3.5) are germane to their respective {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial emphases, then it is understandable that this abstract, diagrammatic mode of [[representation]] was devised to address both {{Wiki|temporal}} and spatial {{Wiki|dimensions}} in the complex [[Avatamsaka]] [[cosmology]].
 +
 
 +
The images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies in {{Wiki|medieval}} [[China]] examined in this brief overview include those introduced from [[India]] and {{Wiki|Central Asia}} via the [[Silk Road]] and subsequently [[transformed]], as well as those developed {{Wiki|independently}} in [[China]]. The process of mapping [[Buddhist]] cosmographies was a diverse one that evolved in tandem with movements in [[Buddhist]] [[thought]] and practice, and also in dialogues with contemporary developments in {{Wiki|secular}} landscapes and other kinds of artistic conventions.  
  
The images of [[Buddhist]] cosmographies in {{Wiki|medieval}} [[China]] examined in this brief overview include those introduced from [[India]] and {{Wiki|Central Asia}} via the [[Silk Road]] and subsequently [[transformed]], as well as those developed {{Wiki|independently}} in [[China]]. The process of mapping [[Buddhist]] cosmographies was a diverse one that evolved in tandem with movements in [[Buddhist]] [[thought]] and practice, and also in dialogues with contemporary developments in {{Wiki|secular}} landscapes and other kinds of artistic conventions. Above all, each of these modes of [[perception]] and [[representation]] is unique in translating into [[visual]] terms {{Wiki|distinct}} structures of [[time and space]] in different [[Buddhist cosmologies]]. As specific [[spiritual]] meanings are assigned to the concrete, material [[signs]], each type of these mappings of [[Buddhist]] [[sacred]] spaces is individually seen to be a "[[symbolic]] [[form]]."
+
Above all, each of these modes of [[perception]] and [[representation]] is unique in translating into [[visual]] terms {{Wiki|distinct}} structures of [[time and space]] in different [[Buddhist cosmologies]]. As specific [[spiritual]] meanings are assigned to the concrete, material [[signs]], each type of these mappings of [[Buddhist]] [[sacred]] spaces is individually seen to be a "[[symbolic form]]."
  
  
Line 209: Line 312:
 
[[india]].
 
[[india]].
 
Bussagli, Mario. 1963. Painting of {{Wiki|Central Asia}}. [[Geneva]]: Skira.
 
Bussagli, Mario. 1963. Painting of {{Wiki|Central Asia}}. [[Geneva]]: Skira.
Bush, Susan. 1974. "[[Thunder]] Monsters and [[Wind]] [[Spirits]] in Early Sixth Century [[China]] and the Epitaph Tablet of Lady Yuan." Bulletin of the Museum ofFine [[Arts]],
+
Bush, Susan. 1974. "[[Thunder]] Monsters and [[Wind]] [[Spirits]] in Early Sixth Century [[China]] and the Epitaph Tablet of Lady Yuan." Bulletin of the Museum of Fine [[Arts]],
 
[[Boston]] 367: 25-55.
 
[[Boston]] 367: 25-55.
 
[[Cassirer]], Ernst. 1953—96. The [[Philosophy]] of [[Symbolic]] Fonns, 4 vols. New Haven: {{Wiki|Yale University Press}}.
 
[[Cassirer]], Ernst. 1953—96. The [[Philosophy]] of [[Symbolic]] Fonns, 4 vols. New Haven: {{Wiki|Yale University Press}}.
Line 228: Line 331:
 
2001. Summit of [[Treasures]]: [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|Cave}} [[Art]] of [[Dazu]], [[China]]. Trumbull, CT: Weatherhill.
 
2001. Summit of [[Treasures]]: [[Buddhist]] {{Wiki|Cave}} [[Art]] of [[Dazu]], [[China]]. Trumbull, CT: Weatherhill.
 
[[Huntington]], Susan L. 1990. "Early [[Buddhist Art]] and the {{Wiki|Theory}} of [[Aniconism]]." [[Art]] 49: 401-408.
 
[[Huntington]], Susan L. 1990. "Early [[Buddhist Art]] and the {{Wiki|Theory}} of [[Aniconism]]." [[Art]] 49: 401-408.
Kemp, Martin. 1990. The [[Science]] ofArt: Optical Themes tn [[Western]] [[Art]] from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yalc {{Wiki|University}} Press.
+
Kemp, Martin. 1990. The [[Science]] of [[Art]]: Optical Themes tn [[Western]] [[Art]] from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yalc {{Wiki|University}} Press.
 
[[Kim]], Inchang. 1997. The [[Future Buddha]] [[Maitreya]]: An IconograPhic Study. {{Wiki|New Delhi}}: D. K. Printworld.
 
[[Kim]], Inchang. 1997. The [[Future Buddha]] [[Maitreya]]: An IconograPhic Study. {{Wiki|New Delhi}}: D. K. Printworld.
 
Klimburg-Salter, Deborah E. , et al. 1997. [[Tabo]]: A [[Lamp]] for the {{Wiki|Kingdom}}. [[London]]: Thames and Hudson.
 
Klimburg-Salter, Deborah E. , et al. 1997. [[Tabo]]: A [[Lamp]] for the {{Wiki|Kingdom}}. [[London]]: Thames and Hudson.
[[Kloetzli]], W. Randolph. 1983 (reprint 1997). [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Science]] and {{Wiki|Theology}} in the Images ofMotion and Light. [[Delhi]]: {{Wiki|Motilal Banarsidass}}.
+
[[Kloetzli]], W. Randolph. 1983 (reprint 1997). [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Science]] and {{Wiki|Theology}} in the Images of {{Wiki|Motion}} and Light. [[Delhi]]: {{Wiki|Motilal Banarsidass}}.
 
1987. "[[Buddhist Cosmology]]." In The {{Wiki|Encyclopedia}} of [[Religion]], ed. M. [[Wikipedia:Mircea Eliade|Eliade]], vol. 4. [[New York]]: Macmillan, 1 13-119.
 
1987. "[[Buddhist Cosmology]]." In The {{Wiki|Encyclopedia}} of [[Religion]], ed. M. [[Wikipedia:Mircea Eliade|Eliade]], vol. 4. [[New York]]: Macmillan, 1 13-119.
 
Lee, Yu-min. 1983. "The [[Maitreya]] {{Wiki|Cult}} and Its [[Art]] in Early [[China]]." [[Ph.D.]] {{Wiki|dissertation}}, [[Ohio State University]].
 
Lee, Yu-min. 1983. "The [[Maitreya]] {{Wiki|Cult}} and Its [[Art]] in Early [[China]]." [[Ph.D.]] {{Wiki|dissertation}}, [[Ohio State University]].
Line 241: Line 344:
 
[[Needham]], Joseph, et al. 1959 (reprint 1970). [[Science]] and {{Wiki|Civilization}} in [[China]], vol. 3, [[Mathematics]] and the [[Sciences]] of the [[Heavens]] and the [[Earth]]. [[Cambridge]]: {{Wiki|Cambridge University Press}}: 210-228.
 
[[Needham]], Joseph, et al. 1959 (reprint 1970). [[Science]] and {{Wiki|Civilization}} in [[China]], vol. 3, [[Mathematics]] and the [[Sciences]] of the [[Heavens]] and the [[Earth]]. [[Cambridge]]: {{Wiki|Cambridge University Press}}: 210-228.
 
Panofsky, Erwin. 1991. PersPective as [[Symbolic]] [[Form]], trans. Christopher S. [[Wood]]. [[Cambridge]], MA: MIT Press; originally published in 1927.
 
Panofsky, Erwin. 1991. PersPective as [[Symbolic]] [[Form]], trans. Christopher S. [[Wood]]. [[Cambridge]], MA: MIT Press; originally published in 1927.
79
+
 
Rosenfield, John M. 1967. Dynastic [[Arts]] of the [[Kushans]]. [[Berkeley]]: {{Wiki|University}} of Cali-
+
Rosenfield, John M. 1967. Dynastic [[Arts]] of the [[Kushans]]. [[Berkeley]]: {{Wiki|University}} of [[California]] Press.'
fornia Press.
+
 
Rosenfield, John M. , et al. 1973. The Courtly [[Tradition]] in jaPanese [[Art]] and {{Wiki|Literature}}: Selectionsfrom the Hofer and Hyde Collections. [[Cambridge]], MA: [[Harvard University]],
+
Rosenfield, John M. , et al. 1973. The Courtly [[Tradition]] in jaPanese [[Art]] and {{Wiki|Literature}}: Selections from the Hofer and Hyde Collections. [[Cambridge]], MA: [[Harvard University]],
 
Fogg [[Art]] Museum.
 
Fogg [[Art]] Museum.
1986. The [[Great Eastern Temple]]: [[Treasures]] ofjaPanese [[Buddhist]] Artfrom [[Todai-ji]].
+
 
 +
1986. The [[Great Eastern Temple]]: [[Treasures]] of jaPanese [[Buddhist]] [[Art]] from [[Todai-ji]].
 
{{Wiki|Chicago}}: The [[Art]] Institute of {{Wiki|Chicago}}.
 
{{Wiki|Chicago}}: The [[Art]] Institute of {{Wiki|Chicago}}.
 
Sadakata, Akira. 1997. [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Philosophy]] and Origins. [[Tokyo]]: Kõsei.
 
Sadakata, Akira. 1997. [[Buddhist Cosmology]]: [[Philosophy]] and Origins. [[Tokyo]]: Kõsei.
 
Scanlon, Laura. 1996. "Moving Through Times: Layering Stories at [[Sanchi]]." In Unseen Presence: The [[Buddha]] and [[Sanchi]], ed. [[Vidya]] Dehejia. {{Wiki|Mumbai}}: Marg,
 
Scanlon, Laura. 1996. "Moving Through Times: Layering Stories at [[Sanchi]]." In Unseen Presence: The [[Buddha]] and [[Sanchi]], ed. [[Vidya]] Dehejia. {{Wiki|Mumbai}}: Marg,
 
92-109.
 
92-109.
Schwartzberg, J. E. 1992a. "{{Wiki|Cosmography}} Mapping." In Cartography in the [[Traditional]] [[Islamic]] and [[Wikipedia:South Asia|South Asian]] {{Wiki|Societies}}, The Histoy of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 1, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 332—387.
+
Schwartzberg, J. E. 1992a. "{{Wiki|Cosmography}} Mapping." In Cartography in the [[Traditional]] [[Islamic]] and [[Wikipedia:South Asia|South Asian]] {{Wiki|Societies}}, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 1, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 332—387.
 
1992b. "Maps of [[Greater Tibet]]." In CartograPhy in the [[Traditional]] [[East]] and {{Wiki|Southeast Asian}} {{Wiki|Societies}}, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 625—629.
 
1992b. "Maps of [[Greater Tibet]]." In CartograPhy in the [[Traditional]] [[East]] and {{Wiki|Southeast Asian}} {{Wiki|Societies}}, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 625—629.
 
1992c. "{{Wiki|Cosmography}} in {{Wiki|Southeast Asia}}." In Cartography in the [[Traditional]] [[East]] and {{Wiki|Southeast Asian}} {{Wiki|Societies}}, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 714—737.
 
1992c. "{{Wiki|Cosmography}} in {{Wiki|Southeast Asia}}." In Cartography in the [[Traditional]] [[East]] and {{Wiki|Southeast Asian}} {{Wiki|Societies}}, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, [[book]] 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. {{Wiki|Chicago}}: [[University of Chicago Press]], 714—737.
Line 284: Line 388:
 
Mogaoku, part 4. {{Wiki|Beijing}} 1987: pl. 5.
 
Mogaoku, part 4. {{Wiki|Beijing}} 1987: pl. 5.
 
   
 
   
Fig. 5.9. Paper fragment with an [[Arabic]] [[horoscope]]. Courtcsy of {{Wiki|Vienna}}, Osterreichische Nationalbibliothck, Papyrussammlung, A.Ch. 189.
+
Fig. 5.9. Paper fragment with an [[Arabic]] [[horoscope]]. [[Courtesy]] of {{Wiki|Vienna}}, Osterreichische Nationalbibliothck, Papyrussammlung, A.Ch. 189.
Fig. 3.12. [[Huayan]] [[bian]], showing the [[Ten Stages]] ofBodhisattvahood and Assemblies ofMa@jušñ and [[Samantabhadra]], {{Wiki|silk}} painting from [[Dunhuang]]. {{Wiki|Chinese}}, tenth century. [[Courtesy]] of Musée Guimet, {{Wiki|Paris}}.
+
Fig. 3.12. [[Huayan]] [[bian]], showing the [[Ten Stages]] of [[Bodhisattva]] Hood and Assemblies ofMa@jušñ and [[Samantabhadra]], {{Wiki|silk}} painting from [[Dunhuang]]. {{Wiki|Chinese}}, tenth century. [[Courtesy]] of Musée Guimet, {{Wiki|Paris}}.
Brill'sThe Journey of Maps and Images Inner {{Wiki|Asian}} Libraryon the [[Silk Road]]
+
Brill's The Journey of Maps and Images Inner {{Wiki|Asian}} Library On the [[Silk Road]]
 
</poem>
 
</poem>
  

Revision as of 10:21, 30 September 2020




THE MAPPING OF SACRED SPACE: IMAGES OF BUDDHIST COSMOGRAPHIES IN MEDIEVAL CHINA

Dorothy C. Wong


The philosophical concept of a "cosmos" transforms the chaos of our experiential world through the structures of space and time and, as W. Randolph Kloetzli notes, It must not be understood primarily as the physical universe, but rather as structured reality at every level, whether physical or spiritual." 1 In his investigation of perspective construction and the relationship between art and science in the Western tradition, Martin Kemp remarks, "Naturalistic painting and science both present models of the world.

Both kinds of model rely upon discovery and invention, and upon some form of systematic recreation of the investigator." The underlying assumption of this observation is that the mode of perception that informs naturalistic painting is based on epistemology, namely, science.

In Chinese Buddhist paintings of the medieval period (ca. sixth to tenth century), certain depictions of Buddhist cosmologies (especially pure land cosmologies) also achieve a remarkable degree of spatial realism comparable to that achieved in Renaissance and classical traditions in the West, and underscore a rational perception and ordering of the universe.

Rather than being based in Western science, this specific mode of perception and representation corresponds to Buddhist cosmological conceptions or, more specifically, the Chinese interpretation and mapping of certain Buddhist cosmographies. Are these similarities in

naturalistic representations of the universe, physical or metaphysical, in disparate traditions only accidents in history, or are there larger principles behind the correlates in conception, perception, and representation? The resemblance of the pure land perspective to that achieved in other traditions is but one of many attempts

I Kloetzli 1983: 19. '2 Kemp 1990: 338.

to map various types of Buddhist cosmographies. What, then, are other modes of representation? And what are the factors that contribute to the selection of a particular mode of cosmographic representation?

The oldest conception of Buddhist cosmology is rooted in the Indian tradition, shared by both the Hindu and Jain religions. This cosmology, however, evolved as the Buddhist doctrine developed, expanding and transforming into a very different one in Mahayana Buddhism. Buddhist cosmology is a vast topic; here I outline a rudimentary classification that distinguishes the single-world system of pre-Mahayana Buddhist cosmology from the multiple-world system, or cosmology of innumerables, of Mahayana cosmology.

Within each category, certain systems stand out because of devotional or doctrinal developments. For example, the pure land cosmology of Amitäbha/Amitäyus, which belongs to the multiple-world system, came to dominate Mahãyãna Buddhist practice in medieval China. Another strand of Mahayana Buddhist thought in China emphasized the worship of Vairocana Buddha, whose cosmology of the Lotus

Repository World incorporated the earlier single-world system but transformed it into a fantastic, miraculous realm. These different Buddhist cosmologies are integral to the diverse theories of Buddhist soteriology set forth in various texts, and they coexist as competing schemes of salvific visions.

Before the introduction of Buddhism, the Chinese possessed their own theories about the universe, albeit less systematic and fantastic than Indian speculations. Buddhist cosmologies and images of cosmographic conceptions were also transmitted when the religion entered China, by way of land and sea routes, beginning in the early centuries of the Common Era. In the fifth and sixth centuries, when the Chinese production of Buddhist art began, the images or partial images of Buddhist cosmologies found in China, such as those depicted in Dunhuang murals (see below), primarily belonged to the

single-world system of pre-Mahayana cosmology. Sometimes interacting with indigenous traditions, these foreign cosmological concepts and images coexisted with local ones. In India, Buddhism virtually disappeared after the twelfth century, and many cosmological artifacts have been destroyed, except for rare examples and those expressed in the form of stupas or architectural monuments.

As a result, the early images of Buddhist cosmologies in China provide some evidence as to what the Indian ones may have been like and how they might have been transmitted to China. The images of Mahayana cosmologies, however, were developed independently in China, coinciding with local developments of Mahayana Buddhism in China from the sixth and seventh centuries onward. These later Chinese images of Buddhist cosmographies largely flourished outside of India, even though their contents were based on canonical texts that originated in India.


This chapter includes discussion of both the single-world and the multiple-world systems of Buddhist cosmologies, and the images associated with each category. It also discusses the transmission, reception, and transformation of Buddhist images of cosmologies in China, most of which pertain to the single-world system of pre-Mahayana Buddhism. When examining the images of Mahayana Buddhist cosmologies that prevailed in China from the seventh century onward,

I argue that the introduction of Buddhist cosmologies impelled Chinese artists to find new ways to visually represent the novel ideologies. For example, Chinese artists attempted the representation of illusionist three-dimensional space on plane surfaces in the pictorial arts of the Han dynasty (206 BCE—220 CE) through the use of a parallel orthogonal perspective.

Incorporating this indigenous perspective with the compositional principles of Buddhist imagery, which emphasize symmetry and frontality, they arrived at a convergent multiple-point perspective that portrayed deep recessional space, in images of pure land cosmologies in particular.

The acceptance of and emphasis on certain aspects of the Buddhist ideology thus had an impact on shaping and transforming the structure of time and space in Chinese pictorial representations.

In examining Chinese images of Buddhist cosmographies, I draw primarily on the rich repertoire of sculptures and paintings from the Dunhuang cave chapels and nearby sites on the Silk Road. Dating from the fifth through the thirteenth century, the art of Dunhuang is predominantly Mahayana in content, although there are also subjects associated with Theravada and Tantric Buddhism.


The Single- World System

The single-world system, which characterizes the pre-Mahayana Buddhist conception of the universe, has been more or less consistently described in texts of Theravada Buddhism, especially the [[[Abhidharmakosa]]. This cosmology is also known as the triple-world system because the world is divided into three realms from bottom to top: the realms of desire (kãmadhãtu), form (rüpadhãtu), and formlessness (arüþadhãtu).


At the base, the substance of this universe is conceived as a single, circular disk surrounded by a wall of iron (cakravãla) on the perimeter. Circles of wind, water, and gold earth lie one above the other. Within the perimeter of the iron mountain is a series

of seven circular, golden mountain ranges arranged concentrically, with Mount Meru, the world mountain or axzs mundi, at the center. The waters of the various seas fill the regions between the mountain ranges. On the outer rim of the great ocean are the four inhabited landmasses, located at the compass points: Pürvavideha in the east, Jambudvïpa in the south, Aparagodänïya in the west, and Uttarakuru in the north.

Five classes of beings inhabit the realm of desire: gods (devas), human beings, animals, ghosts, and hell dwellers; sometimes a sixth category is added: asuras (or demonic gods). The beings of lower spiritual levels dwell in the bottom part of this realm. Mount Meru, encircled by the serpent kings (nãgas), rises above, and the gods inhabit the six heavens on top of it.

Mount Meru thus connects both the heavens at the top and the hells at the bottom. Among the heavens the important ones are Träyastriméa, the abode of Indra (the god of gods), located directly above Mount Meru; and Tusita, the fourth heaven, where a bodhisattva is born immediately prior to being born as a buddha. On top of the realm of desire are the seventeen heavens of the realm of form, and above that are the four "infinities" of the realm of formlessness.

This single-world system, also known as the cakravãla because of the circular iron mountain that surrounds it, is the oldest Buddhist cosmology. In this cosmology, the drama of salvation unfolds in cosmic time, measured in units of kalpas, or eons. The eschatological path is the transmigration of beings going through endless cycles of birth and rebirth, with the goal of reaching ever higher levels of existence until ultimate release (nirvãr.¿a) from the chain of causation.

Because of this emphasis on the temporal scheme of salvation, one of the early images associated with Buddhist cosmologies that survive in India focuses on the cycle of birth and rebirth. Monastic regulations instruct that a wheel of life/existence (bhavacakra) be represented in the entrance hall of each monastery; one of the earliest extant examples of this is a fresco in the porch section of Cave 1 7 at Ajantä, which dates to the late fifth or early sixth century.

Radially divided into six segments, the wheel depicts the six realms of existence (gods, asuras, human beings, animals, ghosts, and hell dwellers) in the realm of desire, hence reinforcing the chain of causation against the backdrop of the cyclical nature of cosmic time Images of the wheel of life did not seem to have much impact on mainstream Chinese Buddhist art but feature prominently in Tibetan art, which also abounds in various types of cosmographic depictions

For example, a large wheel of life is depicted on the east wall of the entry hall (opposite a pictorial depiction of the cosmos on the west wall) of the Tabo Monastery in western Tibet, which dates to the tenth century. Deborah Klimburg-Salter interprets that "While the Wheel of Life describes the nature of samsara, the different cosmologies sought to define the dimensions of the cosmos. Together they depict the microcosm and macrocosm. . . . Thus these images demarcated the boundary between the profane, outside world, and the sacred world—the


world of the mandala [the interior of the monastery] "11 The mural at Tabo Monastery seems to continue the Indian temple/ cave-temple tradition, while the wheel of life is also a prominent theme in Tibetan thangkas. However, the theme of the wheel of life reached southwest China only in Song (960—1279) times in the Tantric context and was also depicted in the later periods. 12 It was probably through the context of esoteric Buddhism that the early Indian image of the wheel of life was introduced to China at this relatively late date.

Since Buddhist cosmology is an ethicist universe that has moral bearings, the single-world system presents the higher forms of heavens at the top and the lower forms of hells at the bottom, against the backdrop of Mount Meru as the world axis. Thus in addition to the wheel of life, which presents a scheme of salvation in cyclical cosmic time, another soteriological scheme exists that involves ascending or descending on a vertical path, with the stratified universe providing a field within which a being travels in stages on the long journey toward salvation in a vertical/ temporal dimension.

Joseph E. Schwartzberg notes, "The implication of this, from a cartographic perspective, is that the visual representation of the multi-dimensional universe in a two-dimensional image [i.e., a conventional map surface] sees it extended along a vertical rather than a horizontal plane." 13 This vertical format usually revolves around Mount Meru as its axis.

A relatively late example is a fifteenth-century Buddhist map painted in Japan, which illustrates this cosmology diagrammatically (fig. 3. I a—c). The illustrator uses a bird's-eye view and a level view alternately to depict the geographical features and buildings of this universe. S/Vhen reaching the formless realm, the illustrator simply uses geometric circles to indicate the four heavens (fig. 3. I b). Similar examples abound in Thailand and other cultures where Theravada Buddhism predominates.

The early images of the single-world cosmology found in China, however, tend to be partial ones. Dating as early as the fifth and

Il Klimburg-Salter et al. 1997: 82.

12 A prominent example is a relief carving of the wheel of life at Baodingshan; see Howard 2001: 6-10, fig. 9. see also Teiser 2006.

13 Schwartzberg 1992a: 334. Rosenfield et al. 1973: 104-109, map 5.

15 see Schwartzberg 1992c: 714—737, fig. 17.13.


sixth century, the majority of them center on the depiction of Mount Meru. An example is the mural on the north slope of the ceiling of Dunhuang Cave 249, which dates to the Western Wei dynasty (535— 551; see color fig. 3.2). The ceiling of the cave-chapel is shaped like a truncated pyramid, with some resemblance to the local vaulted tombs dating to the Han and Jin (265—420) periods.

Murals on the vaulted ceilings of these tombs usually portray the heavenly realm inhabited by celestial symbols, deities (most prominently the cultic figure of the Queen Mother of the West), spirits, and immortals. In Cave 249, we find a commingling of Indian and Chinese heavenly figures and motifs. The center of the north mural is dominated by an hour-glass-shaped Mount Meru that emerges from the ocean and mountain ranges at the bottom and soars to the top of the ceiling.


Guarding it in front is the dark-skinned demonic god Asura, who has four eyes and holds the sun and the moon in two of his four hands. The summit of Mount Meru is rendered as a series of overlapping mountains in a palette of blue, brown, and beige. Above is a palace within a walled enclosure and gates, representing Träyastrimša, the court of Indra.

On two sides of Asura are a panoply of spirits: to the left are the thunder god (surrounded by a string of revolving drums) and the lightning monster (who holds a wedge shaped implement); to the right are the wind god (with his wind bag) and the rain god (who blows rain).

These storm gods are well-known nature spirits of Chinese origin, as are the winged immortals and hybrid creatures depicted in the mural. In the middle tier, however, the kinara (human-headed bird) and the aPsaras (heavenly beings with flying scarves), to the left and right of Asura, are associated with the Buddhist realm.

At the bottom, there are also bodhisattvas practicing within buildings. This configuration of a heavenly realm within the Buddhist cave-chapel thus accommodates both indigenous Chinese and Indian Buddhist conceptions of the cosmos, inhabited by spirits and beings from both traditions. The other three quadrants of the ceiling murals show a similar mix of Chinese and foreign motifs, although the identification of some figures remains in dispute.16

Cave 249 is an extraordinary example of how, at this early stage, associated with both Chinese and Indian cosmologies already intermingled and coexisted. In other instances Mount Meru appears

16 See Bush 1974: 36—37; Dunhuang Academy 1980—82, part 1: pl. 97.

Fig. 3. la. Upper part of Buddhist map in figure 3. la, showing the four heavens in the formless realm as empty circles. Courtesy of the Arthur M. Sacklcr Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, Hofer Collection.

Fig. 3. lb. Lower part of Buddhist map, illustrated by monk Ryüyü. Japanese, Muromachi period (1392—1573), dated 1402. Handscroll, ink and color on paper. Courtesy of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, Hofer Collection. Fig. 3.1c. Detail of figure 3. la, showing the base of Mount Meru. Courtesy of the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Harvard Univcrsity Art Museums, Hofer Collection.

in a less hybridized context, as shown in relief on a number of Buddhist steles. Mount Meru is also featured on the robe of a specific type of buddha identified as either Vairocana or the Cosmological Buddha. In these examples, Mount Meru serves as a backdrop for the depiction of the encompassing universe described on the robe of the Buddha as the lord of the universe. The idea of mapping the universe onto a person's body—and hence the identification of the macrocosmic and the microcosmic—is rooted in the ancient Indian concept of the primordial or cosmic man (puru§a) eulogized in Vedic literature, and in the depiction of Visnu in Hindu art.

After all, the deification of the Buddha also stems from the concept of mahãPurusa (great person). The Avatamsaka Sütra, a developed Mahãyãna text, describes the cosmic or transcendent buddha Vairocana as being interchangeable with the universe itself (see below).

The kingdom of Khotan on the southern Silk Route was a known Buddhist center associated with the creation and dissemination of the Avatamsaka Sütra. Among extant examples of Khotanese mural paintings there is an example of Vairocana, whose body is adorned with images of Mount Meru (or symbolically the Mount Meru throne) and other cosmic emblems Apparently in a Tantric context, this Khotanese example attests to the widespread representation of this specific iconographic type, albeit in different styles and contexts.

Also related to the single-world cosmology are depictions of specific localities in the heavens, usually because of associations with sacred events or deity cults. Trãyastriméa, the abode of Indra on the summit of Mount Meru, is associated with one of the famous events in legends of the Buddha's life, for Gautama Buddha visited this heaven to preach the Abhidharma to his mother, who had been born there as a deva. The Buddha traveled the distance of 68,000 yojanas between the earth and Trãyastriméa in three strides, at Sañkïsa. This celebrated event is depicted in early Buddhist art, such as on a pillar of the north gateway of Säñcï Stüpa l , dating to the first century


BCE. In the relief, a vertical ladder connects heaven and earth, implying the Buddha's descent from Trãyastriméa; the Buddha is not shown, but his presence is suggested by his throne and the bodhi tree at both ends of the ladder. The absence of an image of the Buddha has been ascribed to the "aniconic phase" of early Buddhist art. Alternately, some art historians argue that such a depiction does not portray the Buddha's presence but commemorates the sacred site that is also a focus of pilgrimage.

Another locality often shown is Tusita Heaven, the fourth heaven in the realm of desire and the abode of Maitreya Bodhisattva, the Buddha of the Future Age designated to succeed Sãkyamuni. Maitreya is one of the oldest devotional deities in Buddhism, for his cult arose around the same time Sakyamuni Buddha began to be represented in anthropomorphic form at the beginning of the Common Era. Maitreya Bodhisattva is said to reside in Tusita Heaven, practicing and preaching while waiting to be reborn in the ideal kingdom of Ketumatï.

[[[Ketumatï]] represents a kind of utopia where all the conditions are right. There Maitreya will gain enlightenment as a buddha and hold three assemblies at which countless beings will gain salvation. Since the career of Maitreya stands for that of the prototypical bodhisattva, Tusita is where all bodhisattvas reside before their rebirth as buddhas. The cult of Maitreya was prominent because of its messianic appeal; besides, the promise of salvation in a future era tied into the soteriological scheme unfolding in cosmic time in early Buddhist cosmology.

This cult spread, in the early centuries of the Common Era, from India through Central Asia to China as well as Korea and Japan. Images of Maitreya ensconced in the palatial architecture of Tusita Heaven appear in Gandhäran sculpture of the third and fourth centuries (see color fig. 3.3), and such images were transmitted to China along the Silk Road, with examples found in the cave-chapels of Kyzil and Kumtara. When these images reached China, however, the Indian architectural forms with an arch and 62

columns were interpreted in local architectural terms. For example, a relief sculpture of Maitreya Bodhisattva in Dunhuang Cave 275, dating to the fifth century, shows the bodhisattva in his typical crossankled seated position, enshrined in a niche marked by que gates to suggest the palaces in Tusita Heaven (see color fig. 3.4). Qge gates denote palatial or funerary compounds in Han architecture, and this adjustment to employ a local architecture symbol is another example of the acclimatization of foreign images.


The Multiple-World System

The cosmology of innumerable worlds represents a grandiose cosmic structure envisioned in Mahãyãna Buddhism. Beyond the perimeter of the single-world system, innumerable world systems are thought to be distributed throughout the ten regions of space. This expansion from one to multiple worlds was concurrent with the development from one to numerous buddhas in Mahäyãna belief, emphasizing the themes of multiplicity and plurality. Each world system is presided over by a buddha, and is called a buddhafield or buddha land

(buddha kshetras). In contrast to the emphasis on cosmic time in the preMahãyäna cosmology, Mahayana cosmologies accentuate the drama of salvation in cosmic space, accessible in the numerous buddhafields dispersed in vast expanses of space. There are three types of buddha-fields: pure, impure, and mixed. A buddhafield is a sphere, a place that becomes pure and ideal because of a buddha's purification work through his vows and deeds. When a world is adorned, and thus "ornamented" (alamkãra), with the fruit of a buddha's good deeds, it becomes a pure land.

Geographically speaking, human beings live on the southern continent of Jambudvïpa, but this realm is also defined in terms of its level of purity, and is known as the sahä world (sahãloka). The sahã world is the most important of impure lands. It is impure because the beings there are still chained to the laws of causation and are subject to transmigration. It is also the abode of demons and other kinds of troublemakers that cause adverse events, Yet in the Mahayana

scheme, the sahã world is the "land of transformation" where Säkyamuni Buddha dwells and in which all beings are transformed. Thus the sahã world is considered mixed, alternately ornamented (pure) and unornamented (impure). This allows for the presence of great bodhisattvas who can act and save suffering beings there.

Both in Buddhist texts and in mural paintings, the sahã world provides the settings for jätakas ("birth stories"), avadãnas ("great deeds"), the Buddha's life events, and the Buddha's sermons (such as at Vulture's Peak, where the Buddha expounded the Lotus Sütra), as well as the abodes of the great bodhisattvas, such as Mount Wutai of Mañjuérï and Mount Potalaka of Avalokiteévara.

In addition, there are the stories in various sutras that occur in the sahä world. Within this varied subject matter, one can distinguish two categories: (l) stories that have strong narrative content and involve both temporal and spatial dimensions, and (2) descriptions of the sacred abodes of deities that embody transcendent time. The former are represented in the narrative mode while the latter are often presented in the iconic mode or as a panorama (see discussion below

The most prominent pure land is Sukhãvatï, the Western Pure Land of Amitãbha/Amitãyus (see color fig. 3.5). It is a land of bliss, and the living beings there have neither physical nor mental pain. As an adorned place of spiritual splendor, its features are distinct from those of the sahã world. The ground is level and is enclosed on every side by seven railings and seven rows of palm trees, all decked out with nets of tinkling bells. Lotus ponds are covered with gold sand, contain water that is cool, clear, fragrant, and are afloat with lotuses.

The railings, ground, and ponds are all made of precious substances: gold, silver, emerald, rock crystal, red pearl, sapphire, and mother-of-pearl. Heavenly beings and birds perform music and songs, while flower blossoms shower down regularly, bells chime, and cool breezes blow. Beings reborn there are endowed with a multitude of virtues and enjoy fine garments, ornaments, gardens, palaces, and pavilions. They can freely travel to other buddha lands and return, while the Buddhas of the Ten Directions come to glorify Amitãbha Buddha in flying pavilions. Pertaining to the concept of alamkãra, or ornament, the sensuous images of sight, sound, smell and touch are metaphors for the panoply of wondrous qualities of a pure land.


Depictions of the Sahã World and Pure Lands

The topography of the sahã world includes mountains, valleys, rivers, and groupings of human communities in cities and villages. Because this is the world where humans live, Chinese artists largely drew on preexisting artistic conventions to describe its features. Since the Han dynasty, Chinese artists have devised the parallel orthogonal perspective to portray pictorial space.

For example, on a Han tomb tile of a feast scene from Sichuan, this perspective is articulated through the orthogonal lines of rectangular objects such as floor mats and tables (fig. 3.6).

The baselines of these objects are presumably aligned with the picture base, so the parallel inclination of their sides suggests an upwardly tilted ground plane, which in turn signifies extension into space beyond the picture plane. As the orthogonals slant upward, figures in the distance are depicted above those in the foreground. This way of disposing formal elements in a believable space is widespread in Han pictorial art.

Since the sahã world and the pure lands are distinctive in their features, artists devised ways to distinguish these two types of worlds pictorially. One of the rare examples for examining these two modes of representation is the relief on the back of a stele from Sichuan. Found in the Wanfosi temple site in Chengdu,

Sichuan, the stele features two bodhisattvas in high relief on the front, and low-relief carvings on the back that include a complex landscape scene at the bottom and a pure land scene at the top (see color fig. 3.7). Dating to the sixth century, this represents one of the earliest depictions of a pure land, offering a rare glimpse into the beginnings of the new genre of pure land imagery that developed in China.

The relief in the lower section features a number of scenes with figures and various actions set in a landscape of rolling hills, seashore, and overlapping mountains. A bridge in the center links the landscape section to the scene above, which clearly shows the iconography of a prototypical pure land: a lotus pond with reborn beings swimming in it, and across the pond a hieratic buddha's assembly, 65

Fig. 3.6. Tomb tile showing feasting and entertainment scene, Chengdu, Sichuan. Chinese, Eastern Han period (25—220 CE). Zhongguo meishu quanji weiyuanhui, ed., Zhongguo meishu quanji, Han huaxiangshi huaxiangzhuan vol. Beijing 1988: pl. 241. lush vegetation, and palace architecture. Despite a number of speculations, there is no evidence to firmly identify the subject matter of the narrative scenes.

However, I have argued that the landscape relief depicts the sahã world. It includes scenes of human travails and adversity, such as shipwreck and being attacked by demons; but it also portrays religious activities, such as taking the bodhisattva vow, worshipping the Buddha, and a stupa. The path of spiritual practice is also a path of transformative action that leads to the possibility of rebirth in the pure land, symbolically represented by the bridge that links the two sections. The pictorial relief thus presents a vision of asoteriological scheme: the human condition, a program of spiritual practice, and the attainment of a religious goal.


This portrayal of the sahã world follows the naturalistic tradition of Han art in Sichuan. Depicted from a bird's-eye point of view, the mountains and valleys are shown on a tilted ground plane. Their silhouettes overlap and are then internally modeled, creating a succession of planes that give the illusion of spatial depth.

However, instead of the Han perspective of parallel orthogonals projecting in one direction, the mountains with winding paths draw one's gaze upward along the relief to focus on the buddha's assembly in the top center. This mode of perspective construction is even more clearly shown in the pure land scene above.

Instead of one set of orthogonals receding into the distance in only one direction, two sets of orthogonal lines proceed symmetrically from the sides, converging on the central axis at several points. The intention is to focus the viewer's eye and attention on the central icon of Amitãbha Buddha presiding over the Western Pure Land. The bridges, the rows of trees, the listeners, and the palace architecture all reinforce this directed concentration, at the same time creating the illusion of a rational, three dimensional space.

The distinctions between the spiritual realm and the temporal world are vividly shown, for the pure land is flat and adorned, whereas the human world, uneven and unadorned, is full of dangers and temptations. In this early attempt in the Chinese interpretation of pure land cosmology, it is apparent that the Han perspective convention has undergone a revolutionary change. Chinese artists have constructed a new perspective by rotating the parallel orthogonals on a vertical, central axis.

Focusing on the Buddha as the icon, this convergent multiple-point perspective effectively portrays deep recessional space and an orderly world associated with spiritual purity. This breakthrough in perspective construction in the sixth century can be attributed to the influence of the iconic mode of representation that follows the principles of frontality, centrality, and symmetry, abundantly shown in Buddhist imagery. When the principles of symmetry and balance were applied to the traditional Han parallel orthogonal perspective, the result was two sets of orthogonals, symmetrically placed and angled, meeting on the central axis where the main icons are presented frontally.

By the seventh and eighth centuries, the panorama of grand pure land imagery had matured, and hundreds of these paintings have survived at Dunhuang (see fig. 3.5). Because of the increasing empha

sis on devotional faith to deities, the murals usually only show the splendor of the pure land, without depicting the less-than-perfect conditions of the human world. In these eighth-century murals, the pure land is portrayed from a very high viewpoint, forcing the ground plane to tilt sharply upward. Descriptive details of the wonders of the pure land are extravagantly captured in vivid imagery, further enhanced with the magnificent Chinese-style palatial architecture and a mature, sensuous figural style.

The convergent multiple-point perspective is more developed and grandiose, and experimented with in a variety of ways. In some compositions, the orthogonals at the sides direct the viewer's gaze away from rather than toward the center, resulting in the zigzag or so-called herringbone perspective.

Emphasizing the salvific powers of the Buddha and bodhisattvas, the icons are presented as larger-than-life figures. Since pure land Images were associated with the practice of meditation and visualization, the converging orthogonals enhance this ritual practice by directing the viewer's gaze to the central icon. The virtual space created in these images is so compelling and enticing that it draws the viewer and worshipper into this visionary world, assisting him/her in the realization of religious goals.

While the convergent perspective matured in the seventh and eighth centuries, the traditional parallel orthogonal perspective also developed into a more sophisticated rendering of pictorial space in the depiction of landscapes. Employing visual cues such as overlapping silhouettes of mountains, zigzagging shorelines, objects diminishing in size as they recede into the distance, and humans in appropriate proportion to nature, landscapes in this mode of representation were reserved for the many scenes of narratives which take place in the sahã world. They are usually placed as narrative vignettes along the sides or the bottom of the pictorial composition, such as the sixteen stages of Queen Vaidehi's meditation (see color fig. 3.8).

Between the sahã world and the pure lands are the sacred abodes of the great bodhisattvas such as Avalokiteévara, Mañjuérï, and Samantabhadra. The bodhisattva doctrine is a key tenet of Mahãyãna teachings, and the art of Dunhuang also documents the rising cult of bodhisattvas. Advanced bodhisattvas are portrayed as cult deities in their own right, presiding over the abodes where they exert their

spiritual influence. Some important examples include the figure of Avalokiteshvara as savior who heeds the calls of suffering beings, looming large over a naturalistic landscape (see color fig. 3.9). Another example is the sacred map of Mount Wutai presided over by Mañjušrï in Cave 61, although in this case a sculptural icon of the bodhisattva stands in front of the panorama Bodhisattvas remain engaged in the world, and thus their abodes are still located in the sahã world.

But because their intermediary abodes are the sacred spaces where transformative actions occur, artists adopted the iconic mode of a convergent perspective rather than the parallel orthogonal perspective to depict them. Unlike the flat land, lotus ponds, and palatial architecture of pure lands, however, the topography of bodhisattvas' abodes is mountainous. Though naturalistically portrayed, the mountains are also shown in the iconic mode thus presenting a semi-real, conceptual landscape.

The invention of the convergent perspective in the depiction of pure lands and bodhisattvas' sacred mountains was brought about by the synthesis of native and foreign traditions, namely, the Han Chinese parallel orthogonal perspective and the Indian Buddhist principles of iconic composition.

This new perspective resembles but is not fundamentally comparable to the linear perspective with a single vanishing point discovered in Renaissance Italy, which is based on a scientific understanding of the optics of a visual pyramid. The illusory space described in pure land images is only conceptual and not based on science, but it is nonetheless a means of symbolizing the order and serenity of a supernal world.

In 1927, the renowned art historian Erwin Panofsky published his seminal PersPective as Symbolic Fonn, in which he applied to the study of visual arts the theory of symbolic forms advanced by Ernst Cassirer, the philosopher and intellectual historian who a couple of decades earlier had published The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. 27 To Cassirer, "symbolic forms" are the products of humans' unique symbolizing activity in different spheres of creativity, from art to myth, religion, language, and science. Panofsky argues that, from classic antiquity to the Renaissance, perspective construction is one of those

"symbolic forms" in which "spiritual meaning is attached to a concrete, material sign and intrinsically given to this sign. "28 By this he means that the construction of a pictorial space is linked to the perspectival worldview—in other words, that the systematic ordering of visual phenomena is the outward expression of a specific conception of the world (namely, the objectification of the subjective). In classical antiquity, Vitruvius defines skenograPhia (the perspective representation of a three-dimensional structure on a surface) using the compass point as a center of projection for the eye of the beholder.

In this scheme, the extension of the orthogonals does not merge as a single point but converges and meets in pairs at several points along a common axis. 29 In the Renaissance, the invention of the single vanishing point perspective derived from the scientific understanding of the visual pyramid. 30 Resting on a rational experience of empirical visual space, it creates a systematic, scientific perspective through which we can experience the "infinite" experiential world.

To Panofsky, the Renaissance perspective construction represents the translation of a psychophysiological space into mathematical space. It is no more and no less a symbolic form than the skenograPhia of classical antiquity was of the Greco-Roman perspectival worldview. In a similar vein, we can consider the multiple-point perspective of pure land imagery a symbolic form, in that it translates and transforms the psychophysiological or Buddhist metaphysical space (the sacred space of the pure land cosmology) into a semi-rational, orderly virtual space.

This distinctive Chinese pure land perspective was so compelling that it became the predominant mode for representing pure lands, not just the Sukhãvatï of Amitäbha/Amitâyus. In turn, these pure land paintings were transmitted to Korea and Japan, where some of the surviving examples illustrate the grandeur of such visionary paintings.

This achievement of a naturalistic mode of spatial representation was perhaps fortuitous, in that it derived from a synthesis of the native Chinese perspective and the compositional principles of Buddhist imagery. Nevertheless, the Mahayana soteriology that unfolds in cosmic space predisposed the artists to seek solutions in conventions pertaining to spatial representation. In contrast, the cyclical or vertical mapping of the single-world Buddhist cosmology (see fig. 3.1) pertains to the inherent emphasis on cosmic time in the Theravada Buddhist cosmology.

After the tenth century, however, there was a tendency to portray the great bodhisattvas in a less iconic pose, such as the popular Water Moon Guanyin—a special iconographic portrayal of Avalokiteshvara—seated in a pose of royal ease on a rock formation that symbolizes his abode, Potalaka, with the moon reflected in the waters before him. Depictions of the abodes of bodhisattvas also adopted a less formal, naturalistic mode due to the increasing influence of landscape paintings developed in China, such as depictions of the Water Moon Guanyin, Mañjuérï, and Samantabhadra in the Yulin and East Thousand Buddhas cave-chapels.


The Lotus RePositoy World

Finally, I want to examine the transcendent world described in the Flower Ornament ScriPture (Avatamsaka Sütra, or Huayanying in Chinese), one of the most developed Mahäyäna texts. This world is the buddhafield of Vairocana Buddha, the transcendent and cosmic aspect of Säkyamuni. As discussed earlier, the representation of the cosmic or transcendent buddha Vairocana as interchangeable with the universe is already associated with the early transmission of this text from Central Asia to China. It is, however, the portrayal of the Avatamsaka cosmology that concerns us in this section. Distinct from pure lands, Vairocana's buddhafield is known as the Lotus Repository World, described with the metaphor of a giant lotus. Technically Vairocana's world is still the sahã world, but it embraces all worlds 71


Vairocana Buddha

one thousand petals (one thousand Šäkyamunis) Šäkyamunis ten billion worlds in each petal </poem>

Tokyo 1997: fig. 29.

including the triple-world system, the largest conception of space in pre-Mahayana Buddhism. As the abstract, cosmic form of Sãkyamuni, Vairocana is omniscient and omnipresent, and the sutra emphasizes his multiplicity and all-pervading presence. His world is one of ineffable immensity and wonders, embracing countless numbers of world systems.

Based on the ancient cosmology, the universe with Mount Meru at its center contains layers upon layers of wind circles (fig. 3. I Oa—b 73 Above these wind circles is a fragrant ocean, in which blooms a giant lotus flower. The flower ornament world is a world purified (and thus ornamented) by Vairocana.

It represents a visionary cosmology that glorifies the cosmic aspect of the historical Buddha Two descriptions of this Lotus Repository World exist. In one version, based on the Brahmajãla Sütra (ca. third century CE), Vairocana sits upon this thousand-petaled lotus, each petal of which supports a world.

The Buddha incarnates into a thousand Säkyamuni buddhas, one for each of the worlds. On each petal, in each world, there are ten billion Mount Meru worlds. The Sakyamuni buddhas each incarnate into ten billion Sãkyamuni bodhisattvas, who dwell within each of these Mount Meru worlds. Thus there are altogether one Vairocana Buddha, one thousand Sãkyamuni buddhas, and ten trillion Säkyamuni bodhisattvas.

The sutra also speaks of each atom of the Lotus Repository World as containing the universe of elemental cosmos, countless as the sands of the Ganges. With such spatial metaphors for multiplicity and expansion, the cosmos is described in tandem with images of the Buddha's all-pervading nature. Flowers refer to meditative practice and good deeds, which produce spiritual fruits and seeds. The ocean of fragrant water symbolizes the "repository consciousness," a storehouse for experiential impressions.

A vivid representation of Vairocana Buddha and his Lotus Repository World is the colossal statue in the Tõdaiji (Great Eastern Temple) in Nara, Japan. Dating to the mid-eighth century, Vairocana Buddha sits atop a giant lotus. Although the buddha statue itself was destroyed and recast in the seventeenth century, the lotus pedestal is of original eighth-century date. On the petals are engravings that depict a simplified version of the Mount Meru world, with layers of wind circles and numerous buddhas representing Vairocana's incarnations in innumerable worlds.

There are some thirty examples of murals and silk paintings at Dunhuang of the so-called Huayan bian, or "transformation tableaux," that embody or make manifest the entirety of the teachings of the Avatamsaka Sütra. 38 A tenth-century silk painting depicts the Buddha's

magical appearances in seven mythical locations where he expounded the Huayan teachings in nine gatherings (see color fig. 3. I l) The Lotus Repository YVorld (in this case based on the Avatamsaka Sütra rather than the Brahmajãla Sütra) is depicted in the bottom part of the painting, separated from the assemblies by an arc of five-colored clouds. A large lotus emerges from the oceans of fragrant water, supported by two serpent kings (nãgas).

The walled enclosures depicted within the lotus refer to the infinity of world systems it contains, with jeweled lights displaying an array of countless buddhas. In scriptural descriptions, this ocean of worlds is square and level, and the land within is also clean and level, set with boundaries made of diamonds, gems, and other precious materials.

The image of this luminous world is likened to the jeweled net of Indra, the god of gods (and the ancient Vedic storm and warrior god); in his palace Indra hangs a net adorned with innumerable pearls. The lights of the pearls reflect upon one another, and the pearls in turn reflecting their mutual reflections. This intricate image of reflective light alludes to the interdependent nature of existence. Cosmic Vairocana, the progenitor of innumerable buddhas in innumerable worlds, is one and all; he is the universe itself.

Although these Huayan paintings include the depiction of a giant lotus, the main subjects portrayed in the Seven Locations and Nine Assemblies are (from left in color fig. 3.11):


Top register:


5th assembly (Tusita Heaven)
4th assembly (Suyäma Heaven)
6th assembly (Paranirmita-Vaéavartin Heaven)
Middle register:
7th assembly (Palace of the Dharma of Universal Radiance)
3rd assembly (Träyastriméa, Vaij ayanta, summit of Mount Meru) 8th assembly (Palace of the Dharma of Universal Radiance
Bottom register:
2nd assembly (Palace of the Dharma of Universal Radiance)
1st assembly (Bodhigaya)
9th assembly (Jetavana Groves)

The seven mystical locations all occur within the realm of desire (kãmadhatu), the lowest sphere in the triple-world system in Buddhist cosmology. The realm of desire is further divided into heavens, earth (Jambudvïpa), and hells. In the Huayan scheme, the Buddha preaches the first assembly at Bodhigaya, where he achieved enlightenment, in the bottom center. The subsequent assemblies take place in the heavenly abodes of gods (including the second, seventh, and eighth assemblies). The most significant one, the third assembly, shown in the center, occurs at Trayastriméa, Indra's abode.

The fourth, fifth and sixth assemblies take place in the upper levels of heaven and are shown in the upper register, culminating in the sixth heaven of Vaéavartin. The last or ninth assembly, during which the Gaudayüha (the last chapter of the Avatamsaka Sütra) was taught, occurs at the Jetavana Groves in Jambudvïpa, the site of the Buddha's first sermon. It is shown to the right of the first assembly, thus concluding the sequence of mystical visions in a kind of circular path.

This portable silk painting is identical in composition to a number of wall murals at Dunhuang, such as that of Cave 61, in the spatial temporal arrangement of the assemblies Other Huayan murals are depicted on the sloped walls of ceilings, either with the whole composition fitted into the trapezoidal shape or divided into three slopes, each showing three assemblies.

The only narrative elements found in Huayan paintings are derived from the Gandayüha, the last chapter of this composite text that narrates the young boy Sudhana's pilgrimage to visit fifty-three sages in search of enlightenment. The narrative vignettes at the edges of some murals show scenes of Sudhana's pilgrimage, but this subject matter soon developed independently and became very popular in China and Japan after the tenth century.

The assemblies are more or less identical and are static, with minimal details about place and narrative content, unlike the deep recessional space and descriptive details shown in pure land depictions. Nevertheless, subtly interwoven into this diagrammatic composition we can interpret the Huayan concepts of the three worlds (triloka) and the three bodies (trikãya). For example, the locations occur both at Jambudvïpa and in the heavens of gods. While the historical

locations provide the settings for the transformation body (nirmãmkãya) of the Buddha, the mystical places in heavens furnish the environments for the apparitions of the [[Buddha's [enjoyment body]] sambhogakãya). The Huayan doctrine also describes the Buddha in absolute terms as the truth body (dharmakãya), embodied by Vairocana, the supreme lord of the universe. The world of Vairocana is the dharmadhãtu, the realm of the Law, the absolute, symbolized by the lotus.

A second silk Huayan painting, of about the same date as the last silk Huayan bian, illustrates the Da§abhümika chapter of the Avatamsaka Sütra (see color fig. 3.12) 42 Like the Gandavyüha, the Daýabhümika was originally an independent text incorporated into the larger Avatamsaka literature. It enumerates the ten stages of bodhisattva hood shown in the painting as ten transcendent assemblies arranged into four registers, from left to right, top to bottom.

In the bottom register, the two extra squares show the great bodhisattvas Samantabhadra in the lower left and Mañjuérï in the lower right, flanking the assembly of Vairocana in the center. Vairocana, Samantabhadra, and Mañjušrï are known as the Three Holy Ones of the Avatamsaka doctrine.

The presence of the young boy Sudhana among the entourages of Samantabhadra and Mañjuérï makes reference to the Gaudavyüha, suggesting that the painting embodies the meanings of both the Dasabhümika] and Gaudavyüha chapters. In doctrinal terms, the painting is an exposition of the path of spiritual advancement, from a description of the progressive stages of bodhisattva hood to Sudhana's pilgrimage and realization of enlightenment under the guidance of the two great bodhisattvas.

The two silk Huayan paintings are similar in their use of a grid pattern to arrange the assemblies. They also share similar iconographic details and stylistic characteristics, suggesting that they were made about the same time. The French scholar J. Giès suggests that these two liturgical paintings are related to each other dialectically. Perhaps hung on temple walls facing each other as a ritual presentation, they set up a visual hierarchy analogous to the scholastic exposition of both a general theory and a scheme of practice. The delineation of the ten stages of bodhisattva hood essential to practice is shown in conjunction with the apparition of the buddhas' assem-


blies in their mythical locations, structurally arranged according to those locations' relative positions in the Buddhist cosmos. The compositional formula of arranging the buddhas' assemblies in a grid plan, the elimination of narrative details in favor of the iconic mode, and the diagrammatic configuration of spatial and temporal elements foreshadow the mandala-like cosmic diagrams in esoteric Buddhist art.

As many scholars have noted, the geometric representation of the universe that shows the Buddha's manifold all-embracing presence is a precursor to the development of esoteric Buddhism, and the origins of the esoteric mandala are rooted in such symbolism and mode of thinking and imagery. If the cyclical wheel of life, the vertical Buddhist map of the single-world system see fig. 3. l), and the virtual space of the pure land cosmology (see fig. 3.5) are germane to their respective temporal and spatial emphases, then it is understandable that this abstract, diagrammatic mode of representation was devised to address both temporal and spatial dimensions in the complex Avatamsaka cosmology.

The images of Buddhist cosmographies in medieval China examined in this brief overview include those introduced from India and Central Asia via the Silk Road and subsequently transformed, as well as those developed independently in China. The process of mapping Buddhist cosmographies was a diverse one that evolved in tandem with movements in Buddhist thought and practice, and also in dialogues with contemporary developments in secular landscapes and other kinds of artistic conventions.

Above all, each of these modes of perception and representation is unique in translating into visual terms distinct structures of time and space in different Buddhist cosmologies. As specific spiritual meanings are assigned to the concrete, material signs, each type of these mappings of Buddhist sacred spaces is individually seen to be a "symbolic form."


Bibliography

Braucn, Martin. 1997. The Mandala: Sacred Circle in Tibetan Buddhism. London: Ser-
india.
Bussagli, Mario. 1963. Painting of Central Asia. Geneva: Skira.
Bush, Susan. 1974. "Thunder Monsters and Wind Spirits in Early Sixth Century China and the Epitaph Tablet of Lady Yuan." Bulletin of the Museum of Fine Arts,
Boston 367: 25-55.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1953—96. The Philosophy of Symbolic Fonns, 4 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Cleary, Thomas, trans. 1984. The Flower Ornament ScñPture:A Translation ofthe Avatamsaka Sutra, 3 vols. Boulder: Shambhala.
de la Valléc Poussin, Louis. 1911. "Cosmogony and Cosmology (Buddhist)." In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. J. Hastings, vol. 4. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 129-138.
Dehejia, Vidya. 1991. ' 'Aniconism and the Multivalence of Emblems." Ars Orientalis 21: 44-66.
Dunhuang Academy, ed. 1980—82. Tonkõ Bakkõkutsu 5 parts. Tokyo:
Heibonsha.

1990. Ansei rulin sekkutsu Tokyo: Heibonsha.
1995. Dunhuang shikuyi shu Mogaoku di liuyi ku (Wu dai) Nanjing: Jiangsu meishu.
Fontein,Jan. 1967. The Pilgrimage of Sudhana: A Study of Gapdayüha Illustration in China, Japan, and Java. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Giès, J. 1996. "Two Previously Unpublished Paintings from Dunhuang in the Pelliot Collection." In The Arts of Central Asia: The Pelliot Collection in the Musée Guimet, ed. J. Giès. London: Serindia Publications, 39—51
Gombrich, Richard F. 1975. "Ancient Indian Cosmology." In Ancient Cosmologies, ed. C. Blacker and M. Loewe. London: George Allen and Unwin, 110—142.
Harley, J. B. 2001. The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of CartograPhy, cd. Paul Laxton. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Howard, Angela Falco. 1986. The Imagery of the Cosmological Buddha. Studies in South Asian Culture 13. Leiden: Brill.
2001. Summit of Treasures: Buddhist Cave Art of Dazu, China. Trumbull, CT: Weatherhill.
Huntington, Susan L. 1990. "Early Buddhist Art and the Theory of Aniconism." Art 49: 401-408.
Kemp, Martin. 1990. The Science of Art: Optical Themes tn Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yalc University Press.
Kim, Inchang. 1997. The Future Buddha Maitreya: An IconograPhic Study. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.
Klimburg-Salter, Deborah E. , et al. 1997. Tabo: A Lamp for the Kingdom. London: Thames and Hudson.
Kloetzli, W. Randolph. 1983 (reprint 1997). Buddhist Cosmology: Science and Theology in the Images of Motion and Light. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
1987. "Buddhist Cosmology." In The Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. M. Eliade, vol. 4. New York: Macmillan, 1 13-119.
Lee, Yu-min. 1983. "The Maitreya Cult and Its Art in Early China." Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Link, Roger. 1991. Roman Painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mabbett, I. W. 1983. "The Symbolism of Mount Meru." History of Religions 23: 64—83.
Marshall, Sir John, and Alfred Foucher. 1940. The Monuments ofSãñchï, 3 vols. London: Probsthain.
Miyaji, Akira 1992. Nehan to Miroku no zuzõgaku: Indo kara Chüõ djia e
: Y B Y 7 'x. Tokyo: Yishikawa kõbunkan.
Needham, Joseph, et al. 1959 (reprint 1970). Science and Civilization in China, vol. 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 210-228.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1991. PersPective as Symbolic Form, trans. Christopher S. Wood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; originally published in 1927.

Rosenfield, John M. 1967. Dynastic Arts of the Kushans. Berkeley: University of California Press.'

Rosenfield, John M. , et al. 1973. The Courtly Tradition in jaPanese Art and Literature: Selections from the Hofer and Hyde Collections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University,
Fogg Art Museum.

1986. The Great Eastern Temple: Treasures of jaPanese Buddhist Art from Todai-ji.
Chicago: The Art Institute of Chicago.
Sadakata, Akira. 1997. Buddhist Cosmology: Philosophy and Origins. Tokyo: Kõsei.
Scanlon, Laura. 1996. "Moving Through Times: Layering Stories at Sanchi." In Unseen Presence: The Buddha and Sanchi, ed. Vidya Dehejia. Mumbai: Marg,
92-109.
Schwartzberg, J. E. 1992a. "Cosmography Mapping." In Cartography in the Traditional Islamic and South Asian Societies, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, book 1, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 332—387.
1992b. "Maps of Greater Tibet." In CartograPhy in the Traditional East and Southeast Asian Societies, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, book 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 625—629.
1992c. "Cosmography in Southeast Asia." In Cartography in the Traditional East and Southeast Asian Societies, The History of CartograPhy vol. 2, book 2, ed. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 714—737.
Sircar, Dineschandra. 1967. CosmograPhy and GeograPhy in Early Indian Literature. Cal-
cutta: Indian Studies, Past and Present.
Summers, David. 2003. Real Spaces: World Art History and the Rise of Westem Modernism.
London: Phaidon.
Teiser, Stephen F. 1994. The ScnPture on the Ten Kings and the Making of Purgatory in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
2006. Reinventing the Wheel: Paintings of Rebirth in Medieval Buddhist TemPles. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
ten Grotenhuis, Elizabeth. 1999. JaPanese Mandalas: Representations of Sacred Geograþhy.
Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Williams, Joanna. 1973. "The Iconography of Khotanese Painting." East and West
23: 109-154.
Wong, Dorothy C. 1993. "A Reassessment of the Representation of Mount Wutai from Dunhuang Cave 61." Archives ofAsian Art 46: 27—52.
2002. "Buddhists Steles from the Gansu/Ningxia Region." In Nomads, Traders and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road, ed. Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner. Silk Road Studies 7. Turnhout: Brepols, 45—70.
2004. Chinese Steles: Pre-Buddhist and Buddhist Use ofa Symbolic Fonn. Honolulu:
University of Hawai'i Press.
2007. "The Huayan/Kegon/Hwaöm Paintings in East Asia." In Reflecting Mirrors: Perspectives on Huayan Buddhism, ed. Hamar Imre. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 349—396.
Zhonguo Meishu Quanji Bianji Weiyuanhui ed. 1988a. Zhongguo meishu quanyi Han. huaxiangshi huaxiangzh.uan
Beijing: Renmin meishu chubanshe. 1988b. Zhongguo meishu quanji Nanbeichao diaosu
Beijing: Renmin meishu chubanshc.
Zin, Monika. 1999. Guide to the ajanta Paintings, vol. 2, Devotional and Ornamental Paintings. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
 
big. J.:2. Mural painting or heavenly domain portraying Mount Meru, Dunhuang Cave 249, north slope of ceiling. Chinese, Western VVei dynasty (535—551). Dunhuang Academy, ed., Zhongguo shiku series, Dunhuang Mogaoku, part l . Beijing 1981: pl. 97.
Fig. 3.3. Pedestal showing Maitrcya Bodhisattva teaching in Tusita Heaven, Shotorak. Gandhãran, present-day Afghanistan, first half of third century CE. Courtesy of Musée Guimet, Paris.
Fig. 3.4. Maitreya Bodhisattva in Tusita Heaven, in que niche, Dunhuang Cave 275 north wall. Chinese, Northern Liang dynasty (397—460). Dunhuang Academy, ed., Zhongguo shiku series, Dunhuang Mogaoku, part l . Beijing 1981: pl. 18.
Fig. 3.5. Mural of Western Pure Land, Dunhuang Cave 320, north wall. Chinese, Tang dynasty (618—907), mid-eighth century. Dunhuang Academy, ed., Zhongguo shiku series, Dunhuang Mogaoku, part 4. Beijing 1987: pl. 4.
 
Fig. 3.7. Relief on back of Buddhist stele, from Wanfosi temple site, Chengdu, Sichuan.
Chinese, sixth century. Zhongguo mcishu quanji weiyuanhui, ed., Wei, Jin, Nanbeichao diaosu vol. Beijing 1988: pl. 63. See colorsection.
Fig. 3.8. Detail of figure 3.5, showing Queen Vidchi's meditation against backdrop of naturalistic landscape. Dunhuang Academy, ed., Zhongguo shiku series, Dunhuang
Mogaoku, part 4. Beijing 1987: pl. 5.
 
Fig. 5.9. Paper fragment with an Arabic horoscope. Courtesy of Vienna, Osterreichische Nationalbibliothck, Papyrussammlung, A.Ch. 189.
Fig. 3.12. Huayan bian, showing the Ten Stages of Bodhisattva Hood and Assemblies ofMa@jušñ and Samantabhadra, silk painting from Dunhuang. Chinese, tenth century. Courtesy of Musée Guimet, Paris.
Brill's The Journey of Maps and Images Inner Asian Library On the Silk Road


Source