Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Difference between revisions of "Deity"

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{Wiki|related}}" to "related")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{SeealsoDPL/button}}
 
[[File:0123.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:0123.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 +
 +
 +
 
A [[deity]] (Listeni/ˈdiː.ɨti/ or Listeni/ˈdeɪ.ɨti/)  is a being, natural, [[supernatural]] or preternatural, with superhuman [[powers]] or qualities, and who may be [[Thought]] of as {{Wiki|holy}}, [[divine]], or [[sacred]]. Believers may consider or believe that they can {{Wiki|communicate}} with the [[deity]], who can respond supernaturally to their entreaties, and that the [[deity's]] [[myths]] are true.  Some [[religions]] have one [[supreme]] [[deity]], others have multiple [[deities]] of various ranks.
 
A [[deity]] (Listeni/ˈdiː.ɨti/ or Listeni/ˈdeɪ.ɨti/)  is a being, natural, [[supernatural]] or preternatural, with superhuman [[powers]] or qualities, and who may be [[Thought]] of as {{Wiki|holy}}, [[divine]], or [[sacred]]. Believers may consider or believe that they can {{Wiki|communicate}} with the [[deity]], who can respond supernaturally to their entreaties, and that the [[deity's]] [[myths]] are true.  Some [[religions]] have one [[supreme]] [[deity]], others have multiple [[deities]] of various ranks.
  
Line 10: Line 14:
 
=={{Wiki|Etymology}}==
 
=={{Wiki|Etymology}}==
  
The [[word]] "[[deity]]" derives from the Latin deus ("[[God]]"), which is related through a common {{Wiki|Indo-European}} origin to [[Sanskrit]] [[Deva]] ("[[God]]"), [[Devi]] ("[[goddess]]"), divya ("[[transcendental]]", "[[Spiritual]]"). The [[root]] is related to words for "sky", such as Latin [[dies]] ("day"), and the [[Sanskrit]] div, diu ("sky", "day", "shine").
+
The [[word]] "[[deity]]" derives from the {{Wiki|Latin}} [[deus]] ("[[God]]"), which is related through a common {{Wiki|Indo-European}} origin to [[Sanskrit]] [[Deva]] ("[[God]]"), [[Devi]] ("[[goddess]]"), divya ("[[transcendental]]", "[[Spiritual]]"). The [[root]] is related to words for "sky", such as {{Wiki|Latin}} [[dies]] ("day"), and the [[Sanskrit]] div, diu ("sky", "day", "shine").
  
 
==Other words for the {{Wiki|concept}}==
 
==Other words for the {{Wiki|concept}}==
Line 16: Line 20:
 
The English [[word]] "[[God]]" comes from {{Wiki|Anglo-Saxon}}; similar words are found in many {{Wiki|Germanic languages}} (e.g. the {{Wiki|German}} "Gott" — "[[God]]").
 
The English [[word]] "[[God]]" comes from {{Wiki|Anglo-Saxon}}; similar words are found in many {{Wiki|Germanic languages}} (e.g. the {{Wiki|German}} "Gott" — "[[God]]").
  
ʾIlāh ({{Wiki|Arabic}}: إله‎; plural: آلهة ʾālihah) is an {{Wiki|Arabic}} term [[meaning]] "[[deity]]". The {{Wiki|feminine}} is ʾilāhah (إلاهة, [[meaning]] "[[goddess]]"); with the article, it appears as al-ʾilāhah الإلاهة. It appears in the [[name]] of the [[monotheistic]] [[God]] of {{Wiki|Islam}} as al-lāh, that is, translated, "the [[God]]". All of them come from the most basic original [[Form]] known to pre-Semite peoples and others in the Levante as Elah, and from the [[God]] El. In some cases, it is used by Arabic-speaking {{Wiki|Christians}} and [[Jews]], although not as frequently as other titles, such as Rabb, or "[[Lord]]" — a title also used by {{Wiki|Muslims}} for {{Wiki|Allah}} — similar to the Hebrew use of Adonai, which is the most frequently used by [[Jews]] of all [[languages]], along with HaShem or "the [[Name]]". Amongst {{Wiki|Christians}}, Yasu—an {{Wiki|Arabic}} transliteration of the [[name]] of the {{Wiki|Christian}} Jesus—Yahweh, or Shaddai, that is, translated, "Almighty", are common, with some other names and titles generally borrowed as transliterations from Hebrew, Aramaic, and {{Wiki|Greek}}. In {{Wiki|Malaysia}}, many States have laws prohibiting non-Muslims from using the [[word]] "{{Wiki|Allah}}", but these have been ruled unconstitutional insofar as they do not involve the [[Propagation]] of non-Muslim [[religions]] to {{Wiki|Muslims}}.  ʾIlāh is [[cognate]] to {{Wiki|Northwest}} Semitic ʾēl and Akkadian ilum. The [[word]] is from a Proto-Semitic {{Wiki|archaic}} biliteral ʔ-l [[meaning]] "[[God]]" (possibly with a wider [[meaning]] of "strong"), which was extended to a regular triliteral by the addition of a h (as in Hebrew ʾelō[[Ah]], ʾelōhim). The [[word]] is spelled either إله with an optional {{Wiki|diacritic}} alif to mark the ā only in Quranic texts or (more rarely) with a full alif, إلاه. The term is used throughout the Quran in passages detailing the [[existence]] of [[God]] and of the [[beliefs]] of non-Muslims in other [[divinities]]. Notably, the first statement of the š[[Ah]]ādah (the {{Wiki|Muslim}} {{Wiki|confession}} of [[Faith]]) is, "there is no ʾilāh but al-lāh", that is, translated, "there is no [[deity]] except for {{Wiki|Allah}}" or "there is no [[God]] except for the [one] [[God]]".
+
ʾIlāh ({{Wiki|Arabic}}: إله‎; plural: آلهة ʾālihah) is an {{Wiki|Arabic}} term [[meaning]] "[[deity]]". The {{Wiki|feminine}} is ʾilāhah (إلاهة, [[meaning]] "[[goddess]]"); with the article, it appears as al-ʾilāhah الإلاهة. It appears in the [[name]] of the [[monotheistic]] [[God]] of {{Wiki|Islam}} as al-lāh, that is, translated, "the [[God]]". All of them come from the most basic original [[Form]] known to pre-Semite peoples and others in the Levante as Elah, and from the [[God]] El. In some cases, it is used by Arabic-speaking {{Wiki|Christians}} and [[Jews]], although not as frequently as other titles, such as Rabb, or "[[Lord]]" — a title also used by {{Wiki|Muslims}} for {{Wiki|Allah}} — similar to the Hebrew use of Adonai, which is the most frequently used by [[Jews]] of all [[languages]], along with HaShem or "the [[Name]]". Amongst {{Wiki|Christians}}, Yasu—an {{Wiki|Arabic}} transliteration of the [[name]] of the {{Wiki|Christian}} Jesus—Yahweh, or Shaddai, that is, translated, "Almighty", are common, with some other names and titles generally borrowed as transliterations from Hebrew, [[Aramaic]], and {{Wiki|Greek}}. In {{Wiki|Malaysia}}, many States have laws prohibiting non-Muslims from using the [[word]] "{{Wiki|Allah}}", but these have been ruled unconstitutional insofar as they do not involve the [[Propagation]] of non-Muslim [[religions]] to {{Wiki|Muslims}}.  ʾIlāh is [[cognate]] to {{Wiki|Northwest}} Semitic ʾēl and Akkadian ilum. The [[word]] is from a Proto-Semitic {{Wiki|archaic}} biliteral ʔ-l [[meaning]] "[[God]]" (possibly with a wider [[meaning]] of "strong"), which was extended to a regular triliteral by the addition of a h (as in Hebrew ʾelō[[Ah]], ʾelōhim). The [[word]] is spelled either إله with an optional {{Wiki|diacritic}} alif to mark the ā only in [[Quranic]] texts or (more rarely) with a full alif, إلاه. The term is used throughout the [[Quran]] in passages detailing the [[existence]] of [[God]] and of the [[beliefs]] of non-Muslims in other [[divinities]]. Notably, the first statement of the š[[Ah]]ādah (the {{Wiki|Muslim}} {{Wiki|confession}} of [[Faith]]) is, "there is no ʾilāh but al-lāh", that is, translated, "there is no [[deity]] except for {{Wiki|Allah}}" or "there is no [[God]] except for the [one] [[God]]".
 
[[File:Mafdet.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Mafdet.jpg|thumb|250px|]]
 
The {{Wiki|Persian}} [[word]] Khuda ({{Wiki|Persian}}: خدا ) can be translated as [[God]], [[Lord]] or [[king]], and is also used today to refer to [[God]] in {{Wiki|Islam}} by {{Wiki|Persian}} and {{Wiki|Urdu}} speakers. (But "{{Wiki|Allah}}" is more common.)
 
The {{Wiki|Persian}} [[word]] Khuda ({{Wiki|Persian}}: خدا ) can be translated as [[God]], [[Lord]] or [[king]], and is also used today to refer to [[God]] in {{Wiki|Islam}} by {{Wiki|Persian}} and {{Wiki|Urdu}} speakers. (But "{{Wiki|Allah}}" is more common.)
Line 28: Line 32:
 
Some [[deities]] are [[Thought]] to be {{Wiki|invisible}} or inaccessible to [[humans]], dwelling mainly in otherworldly, remote or secluded and {{Wiki|holy}} places, such as the [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] of [[Heaven]], and [[Hell]], the sky, the under-[[World]], under the sea, in the high [[mountains]] or deep forests, or in a [[supernatural]] plane or [[celestial sphere]]. Typically, they rarely reveal or [[manifest]] themselves to [[humans]], and make themselves known mainly through their effects. [[Monotheistic]] [[deities]] are often [[Thought]] of as being {{Wiki|omnipresent}}, though {{Wiki|invisible}}.
 
Some [[deities]] are [[Thought]] to be {{Wiki|invisible}} or inaccessible to [[humans]], dwelling mainly in otherworldly, remote or secluded and {{Wiki|holy}} places, such as the [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] of [[Heaven]], and [[Hell]], the sky, the under-[[World]], under the sea, in the high [[mountains]] or deep forests, or in a [[supernatural]] plane or [[celestial sphere]]. Typically, they rarely reveal or [[manifest]] themselves to [[humans]], and make themselves known mainly through their effects. [[Monotheistic]] [[deities]] are often [[Thought]] of as being {{Wiki|omnipresent}}, though {{Wiki|invisible}}.
  
Often [[people]] [[feel]] an obligation or submission to their [[deity]], although some [[view]] their [[deity]] as something that serves them.
+
Often [[people]] [[feel]] an {{Wiki|obligation}} or submission to their [[deity]], although some [[view]] their [[deity]] as something that serves them.
 
Ivory figure of Wen [[Chang]], a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[God]] of {{Wiki|culture}} and {{Wiki|literature}} ({{Wiki|Ming Dynasty}}, ca. 1550-1644)
 
Ivory figure of Wen [[Chang]], a {{Wiki|Chinese}} [[God]] of {{Wiki|culture}} and {{Wiki|literature}} ({{Wiki|Ming Dynasty}}, ca. 1550-1644)
  
 
{{Wiki|Folk}} [[religions]] usually contain active and [[worldly]] [[deities]].
 
{{Wiki|Folk}} [[religions]] usually contain active and [[worldly]] [[deities]].
 
[[File:Deity58.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Deity58.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
In [[polytheism]], [[deities]] are conceived of as a counterpart to [[humans]]: [[humans]] are defined by their station [[subject]] to the [[deities]], nourishing them with [[prayers]] or sacrifices, and [[deities]] are defined by their {{Wiki|sovereignty}} over [[humans]], punishing and rewarding them, but also dependent on their {{Wiki|worship}}.  This same {{Wiki|concept}} is also {{Wiki|present}} in [[monotheistic]] and henotheistic [[religions]].
+
In [[polytheism]], [[deities]] are [[conceived]] of as a counterpart to [[humans]]: [[humans]] are defined by their station [[subject]] to the [[deities]], nourishing them with [[prayers]] or [[sacrifices]], and [[deities]] are defined by their {{Wiki|sovereignty}} over [[humans]], punishing and rewarding them, but also dependent on their {{Wiki|worship}}.  This same {{Wiki|concept}} is also {{Wiki|present}} in [[monotheistic]] and henotheistic [[religions]].
  
 
The boundary between [[human]] and [[divine]] in most cultures is by no means [[absolute]]. [[Demigods]] are the offspring from a union of a [[human]] with a [[deity]], and most {{Wiki|royal}} houses in Antiquity claimed [[divine]] {{Wiki|ancestors}}.
 
The boundary between [[human]] and [[divine]] in most cultures is by no means [[absolute]]. [[Demigods]] are the offspring from a union of a [[human]] with a [[deity]], and most {{Wiki|royal}} houses in Antiquity claimed [[divine]] {{Wiki|ancestors}}.
  
beginning with Djedefra (26th century BC), the Egyptian pharaohs called themselves "Son of Ra" as well as "[[Bull]] (son) of his Mother" among their many titles. One, Hatshepsut, who ruled from 1479 BC to 1458 BC, traced her heritage not only to her father, Thutmose I, who would have become deified upon his [[Death]]—but also to the [[deity]], Mut, as a direct {{Wiki|ancestor}}.
+
beginning with Djedefra (26th century BC), the [[Egyptian]] pharaohs called themselves "Son of [[Ra]]" as well as "[[Bull]] (son) of his Mother" among their many titles. One, Hatshepsut, who ruled from 1479 BC to 1458 BC, traced her heritage not only to her father, Thutmose I, who would have become deified upon his [[Death]]—but also to the [[deity]], Mut, as a direct {{Wiki|ancestor}}.
  
Some [[human]] rulers, such as the [[Kings]] of {{Wiki|Egypt}}, the [[Japanese]] Tennos, and some {{Wiki|Roman}} [[Emperors]] have been worshipped by their [[subjects]] as [[deities]] while still alive. The earliest [[ruler]] known to have claimed [[divinity]] is Naram-Sin of Akkad (22nd century BC). In many cultures, rulers and other prominent or {{Wiki|holy}} persons may be [[Thought]] to become [[deities]] upon [[Death]] (see {{Wiki|Osiris}}, {{Wiki|ancestor}} {{Wiki|worship}}, canonization).
+
Some [[human]] rulers, such as the [[Kings]] of {{Wiki|Egypt}}, the [[Japanese]] Tennos, and some {{Wiki|Roman}} [[Emperors]] have been [[worshipped]] by their [[subjects]] as [[deities]] while still alive. The earliest [[ruler]] known to have claimed [[divinity]] is Naram-Sin of [[Akkad]] (22nd century BC). In many cultures, rulers and other prominent or {{Wiki|holy}} persons may be [[Thought]] to become [[deities]] upon [[Death]] (see {{Wiki|Osiris}}, {{Wiki|ancestor}} {{Wiki|worship}}, canonization).
  
 
==[[Forms]] of [[theism]]==
 
==[[Forms]] of [[theism]]==
 
 
Some [[religions]] are [[monotheistic]] and assert the [[existence]] of a unique [[deity]]. In the English [[Language]], the common {{Wiki|noun}} [[God]] is {{Wiki|equivalent}} to [[deity]], while the proper {{Wiki|noun}} [[God]] (capitalized) references the unique [[deity]] of [[monotheism]]. {{Wiki|Pantheism}} considers [[The Universe]] itself to be a [[deity]]. [[Dualism]] is the [[view]] that there are two [[deities]]: a [[deity]] of good who is opposed and thwarted by a [[deity]] of [[Evil]], of {{Wiki|equal}} [[Power]]. {{Wiki|Manichaeism}}, {{Wiki|Zoroastrianism}}, and [[Gnostic]] sects of {{Wiki|{{Wiki|Christianity}}}} are, or were, [[dualist]]. [[Polytheism]] asserts the [[existence]] of several [[deities]], who together [[Form]] a {{Wiki|pantheon}}. Monolatry is a type of [[polytheism]] in which the [[existence]] of multiple [[deities]] is [[recognized]], but {{Wiki|worship}} is given only to one. Henotheism is a [[Form]] of [[polytheism]] in which only one [[deity]] is worshipped. {{Wiki|Animism}} is the [[belief]] that [[Spirits]] inhabit every [[existing]] thing, including [[plants]], {{Wiki|minerals}}, [[Animals]], and, including all the [[elements]], [[air]], [[water]], [[Earth]], and [[Fire]]. The anthropologist E. B. Tylor argued that [[Religion]] originally took an animist [[Form]]. [[Theism]] is the [[view]] that at least one [[deity]] [[exists]].
+
Some [[religions]] are [[monotheistic]] and assert the [[existence]] of a unique [[deity]]. In the English [[Language]], the common {{Wiki|noun}} [[God]] is {{Wiki|equivalent}} to [[deity]], while the proper {{Wiki|noun}} [[God]] (capitalized) references the unique [[deity]] of [[monotheism]]. {{Wiki|Pantheism}} considers [[The Universe]] itself to be a [[deity]]. [[Dualism]] is the [[view]] that there are two [[deities]]: a [[deity]] of good who is opposed and thwarted by a [[deity]] of [[Evil]], of {{Wiki|equal}} [[Power]]. {{Wiki|Manichaeism}}, {{Wiki|Zoroastrianism}}, and [[Gnostic]] sects of {{Wiki|{{Wiki|Christianity}}}} are, or were, [[dualist]]. [[Polytheism]] asserts the [[existence]] of several [[deities]], who together [[Form]] a {{Wiki|pantheon}}. Monolatry is a type of [[polytheism]] in which the [[existence]] of multiple [[deities]] is [[recognized]], but {{Wiki|worship}} is given only to one. Henotheism is a [[Form]] of [[polytheism]] in which only one [[deity]] is [[worshipped]]. {{Wiki|Animism}} is the [[belief]] that [[Spirits]] inhabit every [[existing]] thing, including [[plants]], {{Wiki|minerals}}, [[Animals]], and, including all the [[elements]], [[air]], [[water]], [[Earth]], and [[Fire]]. The anthropologist E. B. Tylor argued that [[Religion]] originally took an animist [[Form]]. [[Theism]] is the [[view]] that at least one [[deity]] [[exists]].
 
[[File:Deity365.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
 
[[File:Deity365.jpg‎|thumb|250px|]]
 
{{Wiki|Adherents}} of {{Wiki|polytheistic}} [[religions]], such as certain schools of [[Hinduism]], may regard all [[deities]] in the {{Wiki|pantheon}} as [[manifestations]], aspects, or multiple personalities of the single [[supreme]] [[deity]], and the [[religions]] may be more akin to {{Wiki|pantheism}}, [[monotheism]], or henotheism than is initially apparent to an observer.
 
{{Wiki|Adherents}} of {{Wiki|polytheistic}} [[religions]], such as certain schools of [[Hinduism]], may regard all [[deities]] in the {{Wiki|pantheon}} as [[manifestations]], aspects, or multiple personalities of the single [[supreme]] [[deity]], and the [[religions]] may be more akin to {{Wiki|pantheism}}, [[monotheism]], or henotheism than is initially apparent to an observer.
  
The many [[religions]] do not generally agree on which [[deities]] [[exist]], although sometimes the pantheons may overlap, or be similar except for the names of the [[deities]]. It is frequently argued that {{Wiki|Judaism}}, {{Wiki|{{Wiki|Christianity}}}}, and {{Wiki|Islam}} all {{Wiki|worship}} the same [[monotheistic]] [[deity]], although they differ in many important details. Comparative [[Religion]] studies the similarities and contrasts in the [[views]] and practices of various [[religions]]. [[Philosophy]] of [[Religion]] discusses [[philosophical]] issues related to theories about [[deities]]. {{Wiki|Anthropology}} of [[Religion]] studies [[religious]] {{Wiki|institutions}} in [[relation]] to other {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|institutions}}, the comparison of [[religious]] [[beliefs]] and practices across cultures, and describes each [[Religion]] as a {{Wiki|cultural}} product, created by the [[human]] {{Wiki|community}} that worships it. Narratives about [[deities]] and their [[deeds]] are referred to as [[myths]], the study of which is [[mythology]]. The [[word]] "[[myth]]" has an overtone of {{Wiki|fiction}}, so [[religious]] [[people]] commonly (although not invariably) refrain from using this term in [[relation]] to the stories about [[deities]] which they themselves believe in.
+
The many [[religions]] do not generally agree on which [[deities]] [[exist]], although sometimes the [[pantheons]] may overlap, or be similar except for the names of the [[deities]]. It is frequently argued that {{Wiki|Judaism}}, {{Wiki|{{Wiki|Christianity}}}}, and {{Wiki|Islam}} all {{Wiki|worship}} the same [[monotheistic]] [[deity]], although they differ in many important details. Comparative [[Religion]] studies the similarities and contrasts in the [[views]] and practices of various [[religions]]. [[Philosophy]] of [[Religion]] discusses [[philosophical]] issues related to theories about [[deities]]. {{Wiki|Anthropology}} of [[Religion]] studies [[religious]] {{Wiki|institutions}} in [[relation]] to other {{Wiki|social}} {{Wiki|institutions}}, the comparison of [[religious]] [[beliefs]] and practices across cultures, and describes each [[Religion]] as a {{Wiki|cultural}} product, created by the [[human]] {{Wiki|community}} that worships it. Narratives about [[deities]] and their [[deeds]] are referred to as [[myths]], the study of which is [[mythology]]. The [[word]] "[[myth]]" has an overtone of {{Wiki|fiction}}, so [[religious]] [[people]] commonly (although not invariably) refrain from using this term in [[relation]] to the stories about [[deities]] which they themselves believe in.
  
 
=={{Wiki|Islam}}==
 
=={{Wiki|Islam}}==
  
{{Wiki|Muslims}} believe that [[God]] is one and incomparable and the [[purpose]] of [[existence]] is to know, serve, and [[Love]] [[God]].  It is the {{Wiki|Muslim}} [[belief]] that {{Wiki|Islam}} is the complete and [[universal]] version of a [[primordial]] [[Faith]] that was revealed at many times and places before, including through Abraham, Moses and {{Wiki|Jesus}}, who are considered {{Wiki|prophets}}.  {{Wiki|Muslims}} maintain that previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over [[time]],  but consider the Quran to be both the unaltered and the final [[revelation]] of [[God]].  The {{Wiki|equivalent}} [[word]] for [[deity]] in {{Wiki|Arabic}}, is ilāh (إله).
+
{{Wiki|Muslims}} believe that [[God]] is one and incomparable and the [[purpose]] of [[existence]] is to know, serve, and [[Love]] [[God]].  It is the {{Wiki|Muslim}} [[belief]] that {{Wiki|Islam}} is the complete and [[universal]] version of a [[primordial]] [[Faith]] that was revealed at many times and places before, including through Abraham, Moses and {{Wiki|Jesus}}, who are considered {{Wiki|prophets}}.  {{Wiki|Muslims}} maintain that previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over [[time]],  but consider the [[Quran]] to be both the [[unaltered]] and the final [[revelation]] of [[God]].  The {{Wiki|equivalent}} [[word]] for [[deity]] in {{Wiki|Arabic}}, is ilāh (إله).
  
 
==[[Hinduism]]==
 
==[[Hinduism]]==
  
The {{Wiki|worship}} of [[Shiva]] is a pan-Hindu [[tradition]], practiced widely across all of [[India]], [[Sri Lanka]] and [[Nepal]]. {{Wiki|Shaivism}} has many different schools showing both regional variations and differences in [[philosophy]]. {{Wiki|Shaivism}} has a vast {{Wiki|literature}} that includes texts representing multiple [[philosophical]] schools, including non-dualist ([[abheda]]), [[dualist]] (bheda), and non-dual-with-dualism (bhedābheda) perspectives. Some [[people]] believe that {{Wiki|artifacts}} from {{Wiki|Mohenjo-daro}}, {{Wiki|Harappa}} and other {{Wiki|archaeological}} sites of northwestern [[India]] and {{Wiki|Pakistan}} indicate that some early [[Form]] of [[Shiva]] {{Wiki|worship}} was practiced in the {{Wiki|Indus}} Valley. These {{Wiki|artifacts}} include lingams and the "[[Pashupati]] seal" that has been the [[subject]] of much study. The {{Wiki|Indus}} Valley {{Wiki|civilization}} reached its peak around 2500-2000 BC, when trade links with {{Wiki|Mesopotamia}} are known to have existed, was in {{Wiki|decline}} by 1800 BC, and faded away by 1500 BC.
+
The {{Wiki|worship}} of [[Shiva]] is a pan-Hindu [[tradition]], practiced widely across all of [[India]], [[Sri Lanka]] and [[Nepal]]. {{Wiki|Shaivism}} has many different schools showing both regional variations and differences in [[philosophy]]. {{Wiki|Shaivism}} has a vast {{Wiki|literature}} that includes texts representing multiple [[philosophical]] schools, including non-dualist ([[abheda]]), [[dualist]] ([[bheda]]), and non-dual-with-dualism (bhedābheda) perspectives. Some [[people]] believe that {{Wiki|artifacts}} from {{Wiki|Mohenjo-daro}}, {{Wiki|Harappa}} and other {{Wiki|archaeological}} sites of northwestern [[India]] and {{Wiki|Pakistan}} indicate that some early [[Form]] of [[Shiva]] {{Wiki|worship}} was practiced in the {{Wiki|Indus}} Valley. These {{Wiki|artifacts}} include lingams and the "[[Pashupati]] {{Wiki|seal}}" that has been the [[subject]] of much study. The {{Wiki|Indus}} Valley {{Wiki|civilization}} reached its peak around 2500-2000 BC, when trade links with {{Wiki|Mesopotamia}} are known to have existed, was in {{Wiki|decline}} by 1800 BC, and faded away by 1500 BC.
  
 
==[[Buddhism]]==
 
==[[Buddhism]]==
Line 61: Line 65:
 
[[Buddhist temple]] {{Wiki|image}} of [[Vaisravana]], one of the [[Four Heavenly Kings]] (Ssangbongsa, {{Wiki|South}} [[Korea]])
 
[[Buddhist temple]] {{Wiki|image}} of [[Vaisravana]], one of the [[Four Heavenly Kings]] (Ssangbongsa, {{Wiki|South}} [[Korea]])
  
In [[Buddhism]]\[[Buddhist]] [[mythology]], [[Devas]] are [[beings]] inhabiting certain happily placed [[worlds]] of [[Buddhist cosmology]]. These [[beings]] are {{Wiki|mortal}} (being part of [[Saṃsāra]]), numerous, and are respected but not worshipped; it is also common for [[Yidams]] to be called [[deities]], although the [[nature]] of [[Yidams]] are {{Wiki|distinct}} from what is normally meant by the term.
+
In [[Buddhism]]\[[Buddhist]] [[mythology]], [[Devas]] are [[beings]] inhabiting certain happily placed [[worlds]] of [[Buddhist cosmology]]. These [[beings]] are {{Wiki|mortal}} (being part of [[Saṃsāra]]), numerous, and are respected but not [[worshipped]]; it is also common for [[Yidams]] to be called [[deities]], although the [[nature]] of [[Yidams]] are {{Wiki|distinct}} from what is normally meant by the term.
  
 
The [[Buddhist]] [[Madhyamaka]] argue strongly against the [[existence]] of a reificating [[creator]] or [[essential]] being (such as [[Brahman]]). Some [[Prasangikas]] hold that even the {{Wiki|conventional}} [[existence]] of an [[essential]] being is a {{Wiki|non-existent}}, whereas others consider that the {{Wiki|conventional}} [[existence]] of such a being is an [[existent]].
 
The [[Buddhist]] [[Madhyamaka]] argue strongly against the [[existence]] of a reificating [[creator]] or [[essential]] being (such as [[Brahman]]). Some [[Prasangikas]] hold that even the {{Wiki|conventional}} [[existence]] of an [[essential]] being is a {{Wiki|non-existent}}, whereas others consider that the {{Wiki|conventional}} [[existence]] of such a being is an [[existent]].
Line 71: Line 75:
 
==[[Polytheism]]==
 
==[[Polytheism]]==
  
A {{Wiki|pantheon}} (from {{Wiki|Greek}} Πάνθειον, from πᾶν, all + θεός, [[God]]) is a set of all the [[deities]] of a particular {{Wiki|polytheistic}} [[Religion]] or [[mythology]], such as the Egyptian {{Wiki|pantheon}}, or the {{Wiki|Greek}} {{Wiki|pantheon}}. A {{Wiki|pantheon}} may include [[deities]] of vastly differing importance and scope.
+
A {{Wiki|pantheon}} (from {{Wiki|Greek}} Πάνθειον, from πᾶν, all + θεός, [[God]]) is a set of all the [[deities]] of a particular {{Wiki|polytheistic}} [[Religion]] or [[mythology]], such as the [[Egyptian]] {{Wiki|pantheon}}, or the {{Wiki|Greek}} {{Wiki|pantheon}}. A {{Wiki|pantheon}} may include [[deities]] of vastly differing importance and scope.
  
Max Weber's 1922 opus, Economy and {{Wiki|Society}} discusses the link between a {{Wiki|pantheon}} of [[deities]] and the development of [[monotheism]].
+
Max Weber's 1922 opus, Economy and {{Wiki|Society}} discusses the link between a {{Wiki|pantheon}} of [[deities]] and the [[development]] of [[monotheism]].
  
 
==[[Monotheism]]==
 
==[[Monotheism]]==
  
In some cases, especially the [[monotheistic]] {{Wiki|Abrahamic}} [[God]] or the [[supreme]] [[deity]] of henotheistic [[religions]], the [[divine]] is not [[Thought]] of by many believers in the same terms as [[deities]] - as a powerful, {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[supernatural]] being - but rather becomes [[Esoteric]], and {{Wiki|ineffable}} - the [[Ultimate]], the [[Absolute]] [[Infinite]], the [[Transcendent]], the One, the All, [[Existence]], becoming or Being itself, the [[ground of being]], the nondualistic, etc.
+
In some cases, especially the [[monotheistic]] {{Wiki|Abrahamic}} [[God]] or the [[supreme]] [[deity]] of henotheistic [[religions]], the [[divine]] is not [[Thought]] of by many believers in the same terms as [[deities]] - as a powerful, {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[supernatural]] being - but rather becomes [[Esoteric]], and {{Wiki|ineffable}} - the [[Ultimate]], the [[Absolute]] [[Infinite]], the [[Transcendent]], the One, the All, [[Existence]], becoming or Being itself, the [[ground of being]], the [[nondualistic]], etc.
  
In this [[view]], [[God]] ({{Wiki|Allah}}, [[Brahman]], Elohim, {{Wiki|Jesus}} Christ, Waheguru, etc.) is not a [[deity]], and the {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[myths]] and {{Wiki|iconography}} associated with him are regarded as [[symbolism]], allowing worshippers to speak and think about something which otherwise would be [[beyond]] [[human]] [[comprehension]].
+
In this [[view]], [[God]] ({{Wiki|Allah}}, [[Brahman]], Elohim, {{Wiki|Jesus}} {{Wiki|Christ}}, Waheguru, etc.) is not a [[deity]], and the {{Wiki|anthropomorphic}} [[myths]] and {{Wiki|iconography}} associated with him are regarded as [[symbolism]], allowing worshippers to speak and think about something which otherwise would be [[beyond]] [[human]] [[comprehension]].
  
 
==[[Scientific]] positions on [[deities]]==
 
==[[Scientific]] positions on [[deities]]==
  
Pascal Boyer argues that while there is a wide array of [[supernatural]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] found around the [[World]], in general, [[supernatural]] [[beings]] tend to behave much like [[people]]. The construction of [[Gods]] and [[Spirits]] like persons (anthropomorphism) is one of the oldest [[characteristics]] of [[Religion]]. He cites examples from {{Wiki|Greek}} [[Mythology]] which is, in his opinion, more like a {{Wiki|modern}} soap opera than other [[religious]] systems. Anthropologist Stewart Elliott Guthrie, contends that [[people]] project [[human]] {{Wiki|features}} onto {{Wiki|non-human}} aspects of the [[World]] because it makes those aspects more familiar.  {{Wiki|Sigmund Freud}} also suggested that [[God]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] are {{Wiki|projections}} of one's father.  Likewise, Émile Durkheim was one of the earliest to suggest that [[Gods]] represent an extension of [[human]] {{Wiki|social}} [[Life]] to include [[supernatural]] [[beings]]. In line with this {{Wiki|reasoning}}, {{Wiki|psychologist}} Matt Rossano contends that when [[humans]] began living in larger groups, they may have created [[Gods]] as a means of enforcing [[Morality]]. In small groups, [[Morality]] can be enforced by {{Wiki|social}} forces such as gossip or reputation. However it is much harder to enforce [[Morality]] using {{Wiki|social}} forces in much larger groups. He indicates that by including ever watchful [[Gods]] and [[Spirits]], [[humans]] discovered an effective strategy for restraining [[selfishness]] and building more cooperative groups.  
+
Pascal Boyer argues that while there is a wide array of [[supernatural]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] found around the [[World]], in general, [[supernatural]] [[beings]] tend to behave much like [[people]]. The construction of [[Gods]] and [[Spirits]] like persons (anthropomorphism) is one of the oldest [[characteristics]] of [[Religion]]. He cites examples from {{Wiki|Greek}} [[Mythology]] which is, in his opinion, more like a {{Wiki|modern}} soap {{Wiki|opera}} than other [[religious]] systems. Anthropologist Stewart Elliott Guthrie, contends that [[people]] project [[human]] {{Wiki|features}} onto {{Wiki|non-human}} aspects of the [[World]] because it makes those aspects more familiar.  {{Wiki|Sigmund Freud}} also suggested that [[God]] [[Wikipedia:concept|concepts]] are {{Wiki|projections}} of one's father.  Likewise, Émile Durkheim was one of the earliest to suggest that [[Gods]] represent an extension of [[human]] {{Wiki|social}} [[Life]] to include [[supernatural]] [[beings]]. In line with this {{Wiki|reasoning}}, {{Wiki|psychologist}} Matt Rossano contends that when [[humans]] began living in larger groups, they may have created [[Gods]] as a means of enforcing [[Morality]]. In small groups, [[Morality]] can be enforced by {{Wiki|social}} forces such as {{Wiki|gossip}} or reputation. However it is much harder to enforce [[Morality]] using {{Wiki|social}} forces in much larger groups. He indicates that by including ever watchful [[Gods]] and [[Spirits]], [[humans]] discovered an effective strategy for restraining [[selfishness]] and building more cooperative groups.  
  
 
More recently, neurotheology, a term which was originally introduced by {{Wiki|Aldous Huxley}}, studies [[religious]] [[experience]] of [[God]] and [[Spirituality]] in terms of [[cognitive]] {{Wiki|neuroscience}}. Closely related, {{Wiki|evolutionary psychology}} hypothesizes on the [[reason]] for the [[existence]] of these [[cognitive]] {{Wiki|processes}} by examining the survival and {{Wiki|reproductive}} functions they might serve.Memes for instance, might help to explain how {{Wiki|cultural}} [[ideas]] such as the {{Wiki|conception}} of [[deities]] circulated and have garnered special {{Wiki|social}} [[acceptance]] by the {{Wiki|community}}. It is hypothesized that [[deities]] are generally accepted by [[people]] because it is an extension to the [[human]] need to socialize with {{Wiki|individuals}} of the same {{Wiki|community}}.
 
More recently, neurotheology, a term which was originally introduced by {{Wiki|Aldous Huxley}}, studies [[religious]] [[experience]] of [[God]] and [[Spirituality]] in terms of [[cognitive]] {{Wiki|neuroscience}}. Closely related, {{Wiki|evolutionary psychology}} hypothesizes on the [[reason]] for the [[existence]] of these [[cognitive]] {{Wiki|processes}} by examining the survival and {{Wiki|reproductive}} functions they might serve.Memes for instance, might help to explain how {{Wiki|cultural}} [[ideas]] such as the {{Wiki|conception}} of [[deities]] circulated and have garnered special {{Wiki|social}} [[acceptance]] by the {{Wiki|community}}. It is hypothesized that [[deities]] are generally accepted by [[people]] because it is an extension to the [[human]] need to socialize with {{Wiki|individuals}} of the same {{Wiki|community}}.
Line 90: Line 94:
 
[[Deity]] ([[Wyl.]] ''[[lha]]'') — [[Sogyal Rinpoche]] writes:
 
[[Deity]] ([[Wyl.]] ''[[lha]]'') — [[Sogyal Rinpoche]] writes:
  
:In [[Tantra]] the [[principle]] of [[deities]] is a way of communicating. It is difficult to relate to the presence of [[enlightened]] energies if they have no [[form]] or ground for personal {{Wiki|communication}}. The [[deities]] are understood as {{Wiki|metaphors}}, which personalize and capture the [[infinite]] energies and qualities of the [[wisdom mind]] of the [[buddha]]s. Personifying them in the [[form]] of [[deities]] enables the [[practitioner]] to [[recognize]] them and relate to them. Through training in creating and reabsorbing the [[deities]] in the [[kyerim|practice of visualization]], he or she realizes that the [[mind]] that [[perceives]] the [[deity]] and the [[deity]] itself are not separate.<ref>[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', page 289.</ref>
+
:In [[Tantra]] the [[principle]] of [[deities]] is a way of communicating. It is difficult to relate to the presence of [[enlightened]] energies if they have no [[form]] or ground for personal {{Wiki|communication}}. The [[deities]] are understood as {{Wiki|metaphors}}, which personalize and capture the [[infinite]] energies and qualities of the [[wisdom mind]] of the [[buddha]]s. Personifying them in the [[form]] of [[deities]] enables the [[practitioner]] to [[recognize]] them and relate to them. Through {{Wiki|training}} in creating and reabsorbing the [[deities]] in the [[kyerim|practice of visualization]], he or she realizes that the [[mind]] that [[perceives]] the [[deity]] and the [[deity]] itself are not separate.<ref>[[Sogyal Rinpoche]], ''[[The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying]]'', page 289.</ref>
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{RigpaWiki}}
 
{{RigpaWiki}}

Latest revision as of 15:10, 29 November 2015

Click here to see other articles relating to word Deity




0123.jpg


A deity (Listeni/ˈdiː.ɨti/ or Listeni/ˈdeɪ.ɨti/) is a being, natural, supernatural or preternatural, with superhuman powers or qualities, and who may be Thought of as holy, divine, or sacred. Believers may consider or believe that they can communicate with the deity, who can respond supernaturally to their entreaties, and that the deity's myths are true. Some religions have one supreme deity, others have multiple deities of various ranks.

C. Scott Littleton's Gods, Goddesses, and Mythology defined a deity as "a being with powers greater than those of ordinary humans, but who interacts with humans, positively or negatively, in ways that carry humans to new levels of Consciousness beyond the grounded preoccupations of ordinary Life."

Deities are depicted in a variety of forms, but are also frequently expressed as having human Form. Some faiths and traditions consider it blasphemous to imagine or depict the deity as having any concrete Form. Deities are often Thought to be immortal, and are commonly assumed to have personalities and to possess Consciousness, intellects, Desires, and emotions comparable but usually superior to those of humans. A male deity is a God, while a female deity is a goddess.

Natural Phenomena whose causes are not understood, such as lightning and catastrophes such as earthquakes and floods, are sometimes attributed to them. They may be Thought to be able to work supernatural miracles and to be the authorities and controllers of various aspects of human Life (such as birth or an afterlife). Some deities are asserted to be the directors of time and Fate itself, to be the givers of human law and Morality, to be the ultimate judges of human worth and behavior, and to be the designers and creators of everything (the Earth or Universe and all contents).

456.jpg

Etymology

The word "deity" derives from the Latin deus ("God"), which is related through a common Indo-European origin to Sanskrit Deva ("God"), Devi ("goddess"), divya ("transcendental", "Spiritual"). The root is related to words for "sky", such as Latin dies ("day"), and the Sanskrit div, diu ("sky", "day", "shine").

Other words for the concept

The English word "God" comes from Anglo-Saxon; similar words are found in many Germanic languages (e.g. the German "Gott" — "God").

ʾIlāh (Arabic: إله‎; plural: آلهة ʾālihah) is an Arabic term meaning "deity". The feminine is ʾilāhah (إلاهة, meaning "goddess"); with the article, it appears as al-ʾilāhah الإلاهة. It appears in the name of the monotheistic God of Islam as al-lāh, that is, translated, "the God". All of them come from the most basic original Form known to pre-Semite peoples and others in the Levante as Elah, and from the God El. In some cases, it is used by Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews, although not as frequently as other titles, such as Rabb, or "Lord" — a title also used by Muslims for Allah — similar to the Hebrew use of Adonai, which is the most frequently used by Jews of all languages, along with HaShem or "the Name". Amongst Christians, Yasu—an Arabic transliteration of the name of the Christian Jesus—Yahweh, or Shaddai, that is, translated, "Almighty", are common, with some other names and titles generally borrowed as transliterations from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. In Malaysia, many States have laws prohibiting non-Muslims from using the word "Allah", but these have been ruled unconstitutional insofar as they do not involve the Propagation of non-Muslim religions to Muslims. ʾIlāh is cognate to Northwest Semitic ʾēl and Akkadian ilum. The word is from a Proto-Semitic archaic biliteral ʔ-l meaning "God" (possibly with a wider meaning of "strong"), which was extended to a regular triliteral by the addition of a h (as in Hebrew ʾelōAh, ʾelōhim). The word is spelled either إله with an optional diacritic alif to mark the ā only in Quranic texts or (more rarely) with a full alif, إلاه. The term is used throughout the Quran in passages detailing the existence of God and of the beliefs of non-Muslims in other divinities. Notably, the first statement of the šAhādah (the Muslim confession of Faith) is, "there is no ʾilāh but al-lāh", that is, translated, "there is no deity except for Allah" or "there is no God except for the [one] God".

Mafdet.jpg

The Persian word Khuda (Persian: خدا ) can be translated as God, Lord or king, and is also used today to refer to God in Islam by Persian and Urdu speakers. (But "Allah" is more common.)

Turkic word for God is Tengri, it exists as Tanrı in Turkish. It is in some cases used interchangibly with "Allah".

Relation with humanity

Theories and myths about, and modes of worship of, deities are largely a matter of Religion. At present, the majority of humans are adherents of some Religion, and this has been true throughout recorded human history. Human burials from between 50,000 and 30,000 B.C. provide evidence of human belief in an afterlife and possibly in deities, although it is not clear when human belief in deities became the dominant view.

Some deities are Thought to be invisible or inaccessible to humans, dwelling mainly in otherworldly, remote or secluded and holy places, such as the concepts of Heaven, and Hell, the sky, the under-World, under the sea, in the high mountains or deep forests, or in a supernatural plane or celestial sphere. Typically, they rarely reveal or manifest themselves to humans, and make themselves known mainly through their effects. Monotheistic deities are often Thought of as being omnipresent, though invisible.

Often people feel an obligation or submission to their deity, although some view their deity as something that serves them. Ivory figure of Wen Chang, a Chinese God of culture and literature (Ming Dynasty, ca. 1550-1644)

Folk religions usually contain active and worldly deities.

Deity58.jpg

In polytheism, deities are conceived of as a counterpart to humans: humans are defined by their station subject to the deities, nourishing them with prayers or sacrifices, and deities are defined by their sovereignty over humans, punishing and rewarding them, but also dependent on their worship. This same concept is also present in monotheistic and henotheistic religions.

The boundary between human and divine in most cultures is by no means absolute. Demigods are the offspring from a union of a human with a deity, and most royal houses in Antiquity claimed divine ancestors.

beginning with Djedefra (26th century BC), the Egyptian pharaohs called themselves "Son of Ra" as well as "Bull (son) of his Mother" among their many titles. One, Hatshepsut, who ruled from 1479 BC to 1458 BC, traced her heritage not only to her father, Thutmose I, who would have become deified upon his Death—but also to the deity, Mut, as a direct ancestor.

Some human rulers, such as the Kings of Egypt, the Japanese Tennos, and some Roman Emperors have been worshipped by their subjects as deities while still alive. The earliest ruler known to have claimed divinity is Naram-Sin of Akkad (22nd century BC). In many cultures, rulers and other prominent or holy persons may be Thought to become deities upon Death (see Osiris, ancestor worship, canonization).

Forms of theism

Some religions are monotheistic and assert the existence of a unique deity. In the English Language, the common noun God is equivalent to deity, while the proper noun God (capitalized) references the unique deity of monotheism. Pantheism considers The Universe itself to be a deity. Dualism is the view that there are two deities: a deity of good who is opposed and thwarted by a deity of Evil, of equal Power. Manichaeism, Zoroastrianism, and Gnostic sects of [[Wikipedia:Christianity|Christianity]] are, or were, dualist. Polytheism asserts the existence of several deities, who together Form a pantheon. Monolatry is a type of polytheism in which the existence of multiple deities is recognized, but worship is given only to one. Henotheism is a Form of polytheism in which only one deity is worshipped. Animism is the belief that Spirits inhabit every existing thing, including plants, minerals, Animals, and, including all the elements, air, water, Earth, and Fire. The anthropologist E. B. Tylor argued that Religion originally took an animist Form. Theism is the view that at least one deity exists.

Deity365.jpg

Adherents of polytheistic religions, such as certain schools of Hinduism, may regard all deities in the pantheon as manifestations, aspects, or multiple personalities of the single supreme deity, and the religions may be more akin to pantheism, monotheism, or henotheism than is initially apparent to an observer.

The many religions do not generally agree on which deities exist, although sometimes the pantheons may overlap, or be similar except for the names of the deities. It is frequently argued that Judaism, [[Wikipedia:Christianity|Christianity]], and Islam all worship the same monotheistic deity, although they differ in many important details. Comparative Religion studies the similarities and contrasts in the views and practices of various religions. Philosophy of Religion discusses philosophical issues related to theories about deities. Anthropology of Religion studies religious institutions in relation to other social institutions, the comparison of religious beliefs and practices across cultures, and describes each Religion as a cultural product, created by the human community that worships it. Narratives about deities and their deeds are referred to as myths, the study of which is mythology. The word "myth" has an overtone of fiction, so religious people commonly (although not invariably) refrain from using this term in relation to the stories about deities which they themselves believe in.

Islam

Muslims believe that God is one and incomparable and the purpose of existence is to know, serve, and Love God. It is the Muslim belief that Islam is the complete and universal version of a primordial Faith that was revealed at many times and places before, including through Abraham, Moses and Jesus, who are considered prophets. Muslims maintain that previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over time, but consider the Quran to be both the unaltered and the final revelation of God. The equivalent word for deity in Arabic, is ilāh (إله).

Hinduism

The worship of Shiva is a pan-Hindu tradition, practiced widely across all of India, Sri Lanka and Nepal. Shaivism has many different schools showing both regional variations and differences in philosophy. Shaivism has a vast literature that includes texts representing multiple philosophical schools, including non-dualist (abheda), dualist (bheda), and non-dual-with-dualism (bhedābheda) perspectives. Some people believe that artifacts from Mohenjo-daro, Harappa and other archaeological sites of northwestern India and Pakistan indicate that some early Form of Shiva worship was practiced in the Indus Valley. These artifacts include lingams and the "Pashupati seal" that has been the subject of much study. The Indus Valley civilization reached its peak around 2500-2000 BC, when trade links with Mesopotamia are known to have existed, was in decline by 1800 BC, and faded away by 1500 BC.

Buddhism

Buddhist temple image of Vaisravana, one of the Four Heavenly Kings (Ssangbongsa, South Korea)

In Buddhism\Buddhist mythology, Devas are beings inhabiting certain happily placed worlds of Buddhist cosmology. These beings are mortal (being part of Saṃsāra), numerous, and are respected but not worshipped; it is also common for Yidams to be called deities, although the nature of Yidams are distinct from what is normally meant by the term.

The Buddhist Madhyamaka argue strongly against the existence of a reificating creator or essential being (such as Brahman). Some Prasangikas hold that even the conventional existence of an essential being is a non-existent, whereas others consider that the conventional existence of such a being is an existent.

Some modern Buddhists, especially in the west, believe that deities exist in the same manner that elves or unicorns do - as an archetypal consensual entity that serves a symbolic purpose in the popular imagination.

Though this may seem a rather weak basis of existence for some, as many Buddhists (such as the Yogacara) deny any objective existence (of e.g. a chair), and many more deny any sort of essential existence of Phenomena at all, the distinction between the existence and non-existence of consensual entities is important to Buddhist Philosophy.

Polytheism

A pantheon (from Greek Πάνθειον, from πᾶν, all + θεός, God) is a set of all the deities of a particular polytheistic Religion or mythology, such as the Egyptian pantheon, or the Greek pantheon. A pantheon may include deities of vastly differing importance and scope.

Max Weber's 1922 opus, Economy and Society discusses the link between a pantheon of deities and the development of monotheism.

Monotheism

In some cases, especially the monotheistic Abrahamic God or the supreme deity of henotheistic religions, the divine is not Thought of by many believers in the same terms as deities - as a powerful, anthropomorphic supernatural being - but rather becomes Esoteric, and ineffable - the Ultimate, the Absolute Infinite, the Transcendent, the One, the All, Existence, becoming or Being itself, the ground of being, the nondualistic, etc.

In this view, God (Allah, Brahman, Elohim, Jesus Christ, Waheguru, etc.) is not a deity, and the anthropomorphic myths and iconography associated with him are regarded as symbolism, allowing worshippers to speak and think about something which otherwise would be beyond human comprehension.

Scientific positions on deities

Pascal Boyer argues that while there is a wide array of supernatural concepts found around the World, in general, supernatural beings tend to behave much like people. The construction of Gods and Spirits like persons (anthropomorphism) is one of the oldest characteristics of Religion. He cites examples from Greek Mythology which is, in his opinion, more like a modern soap opera than other religious systems. Anthropologist Stewart Elliott Guthrie, contends that people project human features onto non-human aspects of the World because it makes those aspects more familiar. Sigmund Freud also suggested that God concepts are projections of one's father. Likewise, Émile Durkheim was one of the earliest to suggest that Gods represent an extension of human social Life to include supernatural beings. In line with this reasoning, psychologist Matt Rossano contends that when humans began living in larger groups, they may have created Gods as a means of enforcing Morality. In small groups, Morality can be enforced by social forces such as gossip or reputation. However it is much harder to enforce Morality using social forces in much larger groups. He indicates that by including ever watchful Gods and Spirits, humans discovered an effective strategy for restraining selfishness and building more cooperative groups.

More recently, neurotheology, a term which was originally introduced by Aldous Huxley, studies religious experience of God and Spirituality in terms of cognitive neuroscience. Closely related, evolutionary psychology hypothesizes on the reason for the existence of these cognitive processes by examining the survival and reproductive functions they might serve.Memes for instance, might help to explain how cultural ideas such as the conception of deities circulated and have garnered special social acceptance by the community. It is hypothesized that deities are generally accepted by people because it is an extension to the human need to socialize with individuals of the same community.

Source

Wikipedia:Deity







Deity (Wyl. lha) — Sogyal Rinpoche writes:

In Tantra the principle of deities is a way of communicating. It is difficult to relate to the presence of enlightened energies if they have no form or ground for personal communication. The deities are understood as metaphors, which personalize and capture the infinite energies and qualities of the wisdom mind of the buddhas. Personifying them in the form of deities enables the practitioner to recognize them and relate to them. Through training in creating and reabsorbing the deities in the practice of visualization, he or she realizes that the mind that perceives the deity and the deity itself are not separate.[1]

Footnotes

Source

RigpaWiki:Deity